The network has a photo of the second MiG-31D under the "anti-satellite missile"

29
The network is discussing the photo of the MiG-31 fighter-interceptor with tail number 82, made by Vyacheslav Grushnikov. This photo draws attention to itself in connection with the presence of a special kind of suspension for air-based weapons.


Photo: RussianPlanes.net/Vyacheslav Grushnikov




This element is identical to the one that was previously used during flight tests of the MiG-31 with tail number 81. These are modifications of the MiG-31D. The car was tested in Zhukovsky. The missile is presumably a development of an anti-satellite aviation complex, the development of which was started back in the Soviet Union. We are talking about the development within the framework of the 30P6 "Contact" project. Its basis was the 79M6 "Contact" rocket with the function of a kinetic interceptor for artificial earth satellites. In the USSR, two MiG-31D boards with numbers 071 and 072 were allocated for testing. Both made their first test flights as anti-satellite aviation complexes in 1987.

It is important to note: in 2009, the then commander of the Russian Aerospace Forces, Alexander Zelin, said that the anti-satellite system in Russia was being reanimated.

Previously, the MiG-31D was launched into the air with a missile, which experts designated as anti-satellite.



That information caused a real commotion in the camp of the "partners", who immediately declared that the Russian Federation was "targeting the satellites of NATO countries."

However, it is worth adding that the question of the fact that high-altitude MiG-31 can also be modified to put certain spacecraft into orbit was also previously considered.

There is no “anti-satellite missile” in the latest photograph, but, as already noted, the MiG-31D is located at the airport with the same suspension used in the tests on board the 81. Therefore, we can assume that tests of promising weapons continue using the second MiG-31D.



There are currently no comments from officials on this issue.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    23 September 2019 14: 18
    A plane with such a beam holder can also be used to put satellites into orbit, and not just to destroy them!
    1. +3
      23 September 2019 14: 23
      Quote: Invoce
      A plane with such a beam holder can also be used to put satellites into orbit, and not just to destroy them!

      Judging by its size and mounting method, I think that such a MiG could be used to use not only an anti-satellite missile, but also a hypersonic Dagger
      1. +2
        23 September 2019 17: 17
        Quote: svp67
        Judging by its size and method of attachment, I think that such MiG, could be used to use not only an anti-satellite missile, but also a hypersonic "Dagger"

        The MiG-31 is already used as a carrier for the "Dagger" with its own suspension system. But I think the Dagger's suspension is somewhat different. All the same, the systems are different.
        1. +1
          23 September 2019 17: 37
          Quote: Piramidon
          But I think the Dagger's suspension is somewhat different. All the same, the systems are different.

          It is necessary to unify or make quickly replaceable. To be more fully able to use them
          1. +4
            23 September 2019 17: 50
            Quote: svp67
            It is necessary to unify or make quickly replaceable.

            Perhaps they are already doing it. But rationalization proposals in the defense industry do not pass through VO. There are already so many "smart" thoughts laid out here, just manage to implement them. lol
            1. +1
              23 September 2019 17: 53
              Quote: Piramidon
              There are already so many "smart" thoughts laid out here, just manage to implement them.

              Yes, what, what, but "we can do it"
    2. -6
      23 September 2019 14: 43
      Maybe they can launch a satellite while Rogozin is thinking there.
    3. +4
      23 September 2019 14: 46
      The thing is necessary, especially if it’s dual-use: to shoot down other people's satellites and make up for possible losses of their own satellite constellation. This is in wartime. And in peace, too, is far from useless thing.
  2. +11
    23 September 2019 14: 21
    Real power! Such things do not accidentally fall into the lens. Western "partners" are now in a knockdown after the most echeloned air defense system from the attack by Houthi firecrackers, so right now it is important to finish off morallylaughing.
    1. +2
      23 September 2019 14: 31
      Is it like in the film - Ivan Vasilievich is changing the profession?

      "Hang up the phone!" Yes
  3. +2
    23 September 2019 14: 33
    Aketa is supposedly a development of the anti-satellite aircraft complex,

    She is beautiful! Satellites will like it.
  4. +18
    23 September 2019 14: 43
    Performance characteristics of the Soviet rocket rocket 79M6 "Contact": launch weight - 4,6 t, length - 10 m, diameter - 0,74 m, mass of the anti-satellite kinetic interceptor - 20 kg, flight time - from 100 to 380 seconds, interception height - from 120 to 400 km.
    LTH MiG-31D: range - 600 km, rocket launch height - 18 km, speed at the launch point - 2230 km / h, satellite orbit tilt angle - from 40 to 104 degrees, interception rate - 24 satellite in 36 hours.

    PS The Soviet anti-satellite missile 79M6 "Contact" in terms of its mass and dimensions practically coincides with the Russian missile "Iskander-M" as part of the "Dagger" aviation complex.
    I remember that someone at the VO "authoritatively" argued that the MiG-31 was not able to launch such ammunition at an altitude of 18 km and a speed of 2230 km / h laughing
    1. +2
      23 September 2019 17: 45
      The interception rate is especially interesting - every one and a half hours.
      A very life-affirming pace - two sides every 45 minutes.
      Even if the pace is with the Iskander, then you will not envy their goals ... with ten sides wink
      1. +4
        23 September 2019 19: 27
        Quote: bayard
        The interception rate is especially interesting - every one and a half hours.

        We need a couple more MiG-31Ds - specifically "to neutralize" the Ham mini shuttle X-37V. So that this device does not have time to "pick" something in orbit against our satellite constellation.
        And the second team of the "collective contract" at this very time would be busy with the "spies" - target designators ... And then the Yankees will receive a full paragraph!
      2. +4
        23 September 2019 20: 48
        bayard
        Well, it’s already 30 sides ...
        1. +2
          23 September 2019 21: 53
          Quote: NN52
          bayard
          Well, it’s already 30 sides ...

          Even so ?
          And this year I counted on 20, I was pleased!
          And about 10 pcs. - I had in mind the pace for one squadron, because they are based on one for each direction ...
          1. +3
            23 September 2019 21: 58
            bayard
            No...
            And as part of the airbases, little by little and slowly ...
            1. +5
              24 September 2019 04: 48
              "Little by little and not in a hurry" and already a regiment? I like. Yes
              Dmitriy hi
    2. +1
      23 September 2019 20: 24
      Quote: Operator
      The Soviet anti-satellite missile 79M6 "Contact" in terms of its mass and dimensions practically coincides with the Russian missile "Iskander-M" as part of the "Kinzhal" aviation complex.
      It would be more correct to say "not quite the same", since The Kh-47M2 is much shorter and thicker with a noticeably lower launch weight.
      Weight and size characteristics of the Kh-47M2 missile of the "Dagger" complex:
      - starting weight (with starting accelerator) - about 4 tons;
      - length (with starting accelerator) - 7,93 m;
      - diameter - 0,925 m.
  5. +2
    23 September 2019 14: 58
    And it is good that there are no official comments, for it is better to ignore any attempt to get an answer in such matters, the state should have its own defense secrets.
  6. +4
    23 September 2019 15: 10
    Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
    The thing is necessary, especially if it’s dual-use: to shoot down other people's satellites and make up for possible losses of their own satellite constellation. This is in wartime. And in peace, too, is far from useless thing.

    This system can bring down other people's satellites, but it’s unlikely that anything decent can be deduced, especially in the interests of Moscow Region. In the American ASAT system, the load was 15,4 kg with a rocket in 1180 kg. Our 30P6 system has 20 kg with an 4,5 ton rocket
    1. +4
      23 September 2019 15: 44
      Quote: Old26
      This system can bring down other people's satellites, but it’s unlikely that anything decent can be deduced, especially in the interests of Moscow Region. In the American ASAT system, the load was 15,4 kg with a rocket in 1180 kg. Our 30P6 system has 20 kg with an 4,5 ton rocket

      Well, not everything is as bad as it seems ... but the Burlak project for TU-160 with the payload output per ton? Although the project in 2000 was frozen, but after it was ..
      19 January 2000 in Samara State Research and Production Space Center "Progress" and Aerospace Corporation "Air Launch" signed an agreement on cooperation on the creation of a space launch aircraft-missile complex (AACS) "Air Launch"


      The stages of functioning of the “Air Launch” system are shown in Fig. 6 and start with loading a launch vehicle with a space booster block, placed in a launch container and having passed a full cycle of checks, into the cargo compartment of the launch vehicle at the Bezymyanka airfield in Samara (Russia) near the Progress manufacturer.

      In the launch launch zone, in order to create a favorable condition for the launch vehicle when it is landing from the launch aircraft and the best initial conditions for its flight, the launch aircraft implements a special Gorka maneuver with access to a parabolic trajectory providing a flight mode close to the 6-10 seconds zero gravity, when the normal load on the launch vehicle does not exceed 0,1 ... 0,3 units. This allows 2 ... 2,5 times to increase the landing mass of the launch vehicle compared to conventional landing in horizontal flight and, accordingly, increase its carrying capacity. When the carrier aircraft in the “Hill” mode reaches the maximum angle of inclination of the trajectory to the local horizon (the angle of rotation is about 20 °), the carrier rocket is ejected from the carrier aircraft using a special launch container using a pneumatic ejection system with a powder pressure accumulator . The process of launching a booster rocket from a boarding aircraft lasts about 3 seconds, the longitudinal overload does not exceed 1,5 units.

      After landing the launch vehicle and the subsequent implementation of the flight sections of the first and second stages of the launch vehicle and the space booster block, the satellite is separated when it enters a given orbit.

      The technology of landing heavy cargoes from an aircraft, significantly exceeding the mass of cargoes landing in a horizontal flight, was implemented in our country in the 1987-1990 years under the Energy-Buran program in the interests of working out the rescue of reusable missile blocks of the first stage of the launch vehicle " Energy". The technology provides for the landing of heavy loads in airplane flight modes close to zero gravity.

      Figure 9 shows the energy capabilities of the Air Launch system, from which it follows that the Launch Booster is capable of launching satellites weighing up to 3,5 tons to low polar orbits, up to 4,5 tons to low equatorial orbits, and up to 0,85 tons to the orbits of navigation systems Glonass and Galileo, up to 0,8 tons in geostationary orbit. When equipping geostationary satellites with an apogee propulsion system that enables the satellite to transition from a geo-transitional orbit to a geostationary orbit, the Polet launch vehicle will allow satellites weighing up to 1 tons to be launched into a geostationary orbit. To the Moon and to the flight paths, the Air Start system will be able to launch spacecraft weighing 1 ... 1,2 tons.

  7. 0
    23 September 2019 17: 14
    Quote: Old26
    something decent to deduce, especially in the interests of Moscow Region - hardly. In the American ASAT system, the load was 15,4 kg with a rocket in 1180 kg. Our 30P6 system has 20 kg with an 4,5 ton rocket

    The Soviet 30P6 complex in the mode of an aircraft-rocket carrier can display 70-kg payload in a circular near-earth orbit with an altitude of 300 km. In the Soviet Union, this was not realized due to the large size and weight of the then electronic equipment for conducting RTR, optoelectronic reconnaissance, compilation of gravity maps, mobile communications and data transmission.

    In connection with a multiple reduction in the mass-dimensional characteristics of the element base over the past 30 years, microsatellites have become quite functional.

    Already on the issue of cheap loading of payload into space, the United States lagged behind the Russian Federation forever - hello Ilon Mask laughing
  8. +2
    23 September 2019 17: 31
    The MiG-31D itself is a good booster, the launch of satellites into orbit in this way can be made several times cheaper
  9. +4
    23 September 2019 17: 40
    Quote: NEXUS
    Well, not everything is as bad as it seems ... but the Burlak project for the TU-160 with the payload output per ton?

    Andrew! We are not talking about Burlak or some other system, for example Ishim. It is specifically about the MiG-31 with an anti-satellite missile. It can shoot down the target, but what kind of satellite will it bring out with a payload of 15-20 kg. Any kubsats. And the satellites for replenishment of the satellite constellation of the aircraft will certainly not be displayed
  10. +5
    23 September 2019 18: 00
    In the photo is not the MiG-31D. MiG-31D can be easily identified by vertical surfaces at the wingtips.
    1. +4
      23 September 2019 20: 41
      The official name of this MiG-31 interception system with this type of airborne weapons is not yet known.
      While there is BM, BSM, K.
      And the Ishim project, as part of the Mig 31D interception complex, was experimental ...
  11. +2
    23 September 2019 20: 38
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: bayard
    The interception rate is especially interesting - every one and a half hours.

    We need a couple more MiG-31Ds - specifically "to neutralize" the Ham mini shuttle X-37V. So that this device does not have time to "pick" something in orbit against our satellite constellation.
    And the second team of the "collective contract" at this very time would be busy with the "spies" - target designators ... And then the Yankees will receive a full paragraph!

    It is unlikely that this anti-satellite missile will be able to bring down something in orbits above 150-200 km. And all the spies are much higher
  12. +1
    23 September 2019 21: 38
    And the first sides are gathering dust somewhere in Kazakhstan.
  13. The comment was deleted.