Claims Russia and US Endorse Israeli Strikes on Targets in Iraq

69
Asharq al-Awsat, a London-based Arabic-language publication, claims that Russia and the United States allegedly gave the “green light” to Israeli attacks on Iranian targets in Iraq.





According to Western sources, Moscow and Washington decided not to impede Israeli strikes in Iraq and Syria when they are “vital to the security of this country.” Also, Israel will not be prevented from tracking Iranian activities in the region. Neither Moscow nor Washington currently confirms this statement.

The main objectives of the IDF are high-precision long-range missiles. Israel has repeatedly warned that it will not allow an Iranian presence in Syria, and admitted to inflicting hundreds of airstrikes, hindering the transfer of advanced weapons systems, including anti-aircraft missile systems, to the Lebanese Hezbollah group.

"Military Review" wrote earlier about the destruction of the warehouse weaponsbelonging to pro-Iranian formations located approximately 80 km north of Baghdad.

The Shiite militia, formed in 2016 to fight the Islamic state banned in Russia in conjunction with Iraqi and Kurdish forces, are directly funded and equipped with Iran. According to Sky News Arabia, the aim of the attacks was missiles that were recently deployed to Iraq. The channel claims that as a result of the bombing, at least 50 missiles were destroyed.

Israel intensifies attacks on Iraq


Last week, a blow was struck at another ammunition depot southwest of Baghdad, owned by Iranian-backed Shiite militias. According to ImageSat International (ISI), a satellite operator known for publishing and analyzing images taken from space, the warehouse destroyed last week was 140 x 180 meters in size, belonged to the Khashd al-Shaabi militia (People’s Mobilization) and was located in Iraq military base.

The main building is destroyed, with significant signs of collateral damage. Based on the observed damage characteristics, it can be assumed that the explosion was caused by an air strike followed by a secondary explosion of explosives.

- says an ISI research note.

Last month, an explosion destroyed another military base at Amerli in the northern Iraqi province of Salaheddin, killing two people.

Last week, Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi banned unauthorized flights and ordered that all military bases and ammunition depots be removed from cities in response to air strikes. He also ordered an investigation into the bombing.

Israeli officials previously stated that Tehran is trying to gain a foothold in Iraq, a predominantly Shiite country. They compared the situation with the Syrian: in the SAR, according to the Israelis, Iran created and strengthened a parallel security structure. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted at Israel’s role in striking, saying that "Iran has no immunity - nowhere."

In September, Reuters reported that Iran had been delivering ballistic missiles to Shiite militias in Iraq for several months. The note also mentioned that Iran plans not only to transfer missiles, but also to build them in place. Tehran allegedly gave the militias Fateh-110-Zolfaqar and Zelzal missiles, which have a range of 200-700 km, which posed a threat to both Saudi Arabia and Israel.
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    21 August 2019 20: 00
    Moscow and Washington decided not to impede Israeli strikes in Iraq and Syria when they are “vital to the security of this country.” Also, Israel will not be prevented from tracking Iranian activities in the region. Neither Moscow nor Washington currently confirms this statement.

    The fact that Moscow does not refute such statements is that alarming ..
    1. +10
      21 August 2019 20: 14
      Quote: Svarog
      The fact that Moscow does not refute such statements is something that worries

      And what: should the Kremlin strictly respond to all the attacks of the corrupt Western zagorenenki? request
      1. +5
        21 August 2019 20: 17
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        And what: should the Kremlin strictly respond to all the attacks of the corrupt Western zagorenenki?

        Usually it does .. and even comments on Twitter on comments ..
        1. +6
          21 August 2019 20: 20
          Quote: Svarog
          Usually it does .. and even comments on Twitter on comments ..

          In that case: wait.
    2. +3
      21 August 2019 20: 16
      Quote: Svarog
      Moscow and Washington decided not to impede Israeli strikes in Iraq and Syria when they are “vital to the security of this country.” Also, Israel will not be prevented from tracking Iranian activities in the region. Neither Moscow nor Washington currently confirms this statement.

      The fact that Moscow does not refute such statements is that alarming ..

      Most likely fake.
      1. +6
        21 August 2019 21: 08
        Quote: sir.jonn
        Most likely fake.

        Fakishche! These fake scribblers cannot even refer to anything, since Russia and the United States have not discussed such things for a long time, there have long been no contacts at such a level to make a decision, all the more so dubious.
      2. +1
        21 August 2019 23: 29
        Quote: sir.jonn
        Most likely fake.

        Russia, by definition, does not go for the Euphrates, there is a tacit agreement with the Americans at the level of military structures. Similarly, they do not go into the zone of our control in Syria, respectively, there can be no agreements by definition ... one hundred percent fake aimed at exacerbating the Russian Iranian relations.

        In Iraq, the deputy commander of the Popular Militia Force spoke. He directly accused Israel and the US of attacks on their military bases, saying that Americans allowed four Israeli UAVs to strike in Iraq. All further responsibility for what will happen in the future lies with the United States.

        https://www.yahoo.com/news/1-iraq-param … 33963.html
    3. -6
      21 August 2019 20: 18
      Quote: Svarog
      The fact that Moscow does not refute such statements is that alarming ..

      Here G 8 is planned and the Jews take advantage of the moment (as always sneakily and quietly) .. But this is not for long, since their F-35s are fixed and not only in Iraq ..
      This assembly (G8) is usually formal and Russia will not go astray ..! But Israel will play out .. I'm sure of it. soldier
      Oh wei they will definitely ..
      1. +5
        21 August 2019 20: 34
        Quote: Mixanchik
        And Israel will play out

        with Putin? not .... Mikhan, he will not play out, he will agree.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
      1. +5
        21 August 2019 21: 19
        Quote: axiles100682
        Moreover, it is beneficial for us that Israel

        Beneficial than? It seems to me that the present point of view is erroneous and distracts from the real position of our leaders in this matter. I admit that Putin turns a blind eye to some things, but I do not admit that he can approve of rocket and other attacks by Israel against anyone, especially without good reason, hiding behind his partner.
        1. 0
          21 August 2019 21: 29
          I don’t think that he secretly approved or didn’t approve of something. He, as you correctly put it, closes his eyes to some things. And there are already two options for why he closes: 1. there is nothing to put pressure on Israel. 2. It is beneficial for us that Israel does not allow Iran to gain a foothold thoroughly in Syria and Iraq. I adhere to the second option.
          1. -2
            21 August 2019 22: 10
            Quote: axiles100682
            1. there is no need to put pressure on Israel. 2. It is beneficial for us that Israel is preventing Iran from gaining a foothold in Syria and Iraq. I adhere to the second option.

            1 "nothing to put pressure on Israel"
            There is always something to push, you probably did not compare the map of Russia and Israel.
            2 "It is beneficial for us that Israel does not allow Iran to gain a foothold in Syria and Iraq."
            And of course you are right. Iran today is a pain in the neck of all.
            And Israel will once again meet with Russia, after that with the USA, and then again with Russia.
            Now with Ukraine, and in September Putin in Jerusalem
            It works better than crushing.
            1. +1
              21 August 2019 22: 16
              And you are not right for the Russian Federation. Iran is not at all a bit smug. And a pretty good predictable ally and partner. But Israel is no longer predictable for the Russian Federation. But this does not negate the fact that the Russian Federation is also advantageous if Israel Iran restrains a little in Syria.
              1. -1
                21 August 2019 22: 36
                Quote: axiles100682
                .A pretty good predictable ally and partner. The same Israel is no longer predictable for the Russian Federation.

                I already wrote, but I want an official statement for you.
                Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said:
                "Iran is not our ally, we care about the security of Israel "
                It disagrees with your opinion.
                Time will tell (but not what is on TV) but the real one.
                1. 0
                  22 August 2019 01: 19
                  But my opinion must necessarily coincide with the opinion of the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia Sergey Ryabkov? I don’t know how this comrade even looks. In general, one thing is said to the public in politics, but what is going on behind the scenes we will never know for sure. I agree only in one thing ,time will tell. drinks
          2. 0
            21 August 2019 22: 15
            Quote: axiles100682
            .We are beneficial that Israel does not allow Iran to gain a foothold in Syria and Iraq

            I do not think so. We benefit from peace among this conglomerate of countries around Syria, because this means that the Ishil and all sorts of other groups of this kind are finished, this means that these states will engage in the real development of their economies and, as a result, Russia's participation in this (money, participation of enterprises, etc.) ), that is, our country will begin to make money on this, and not spend as it is now. For Iran, in a situation when it is imposed on all sides by sanctions, there is simply no other way out but helping its neighbors, consolidating its influence to build and develop its economy together with them, because the West is not profitable for any economically independent states, their very image existence comes from ... it explains very well the expression from the seventies "economic colonization". That is, Iran at the moment is doing all this not only or not so much for political reasons as for reasons of survival.
            1. -1
              21 August 2019 22: 24
              Well, this is a very, very long-term forecast. Because this tramp will not end in Syria for another 5 years, there’s nothing to understand with Iraq, and there’s also Libya, and where else it’s burning. So BV will not calm down for a long time.
              1. -2
                21 August 2019 22: 38
                Quote: axiles100682
                So BV will not calm down for a long time.

                This is depressing. If the very Israel, USA, Europe really wanted peace in the Middle East, it would already be.
                1. -1
                  22 August 2019 01: 22
                  That's exactly what the war party is in the majority for now. Waiting for a speedy peace on the planet in general and on BV in particular is an empty idea
                2. +1
                  22 August 2019 09: 18
                  Quote: Jura
                  If the very Israel, USA, Europe really wanted peace in the Middle East, it would already be.

                  Bullshit is that Israel, America, Europe, and Russia, too, have very different views on how the world should look in the Middle East. Moreover, even within Israel, the views on this are very different. And among Muslims there is a full spectrum, but basically the consensus is that there should not be Israel, or it should be anywhere, but not where it is. So there will be no peace, at least during the lifetime of the current generation.
                  1. 0
                    22 August 2019 11: 36
                    Quote: Nagan
                    Israel, America, Europe, and Russia too, have very different views on how the world should look in the Middle East.

                    I agree, and these views come from each of their primarily "selfish" interests, economic motives are not the only, but the main thing that dictates the foreign policy of states.
      2. 0
        21 August 2019 21: 32
        Quote: axiles100682
        But why does it refute or confirm? It is all the more beneficial for us that Israel holds Iran a little. If only the Turks would be there who would be picking up in the quiet and generally get hurt. laughing

        The way it happened recently with the escort, where recently the commander of the baboons was knocked down, most likely will be gone. They will agree that the Turks behave more restrained and no longer compromise themselves with the frank rotation of the militants.
        1. -2
          21 August 2019 22: 10
          Most likely it will be so. Turkey is certainly a strong regional player, but without allies it’s weak to play alone. And in Syria, the choice is not great either for the USA or the Russian Federation. Moreover, the United States is clearly losing in Syria and it’s unacceptable for Turkey to do so. So it remains to go to an alliance with the Russian Federation
      3. 0
        21 August 2019 21: 57
        Quote: axiles100682
        Still, there would be Turks there who would be gambling in the quiet and generally it would be hurt.

        Thank you for the offer, but the Turks are still doing the wind and trade with Israel silently for hundreds of millions of dollars. It seems to me that you yourself will deal with them. The main thing is that the S-400 they fired at their aircraft.
        1. 0
          21 August 2019 22: 03
          I didn’t offer you anything. The S-400 will shoot at those aircraft that do not care for Russia, in other cases a missile will fail. wink
          1. -1
            21 August 2019 22: 30
            Quote: axiles100682
            I didn’t offer you anything.

            Yes, of course not ME.
            But the proposal was:
            "axiles100682 (Alexander) Today, 20:34
            And why does it refute or confirm? It’s all the more beneficial for us that Israel holds Iran a little.It would be the Turks there who would be gambling in the quiet and in general it would be hurt. "
          2. 0
            22 August 2019 09: 22
            Quote: axiles100682
            S-400s will shoot at those aircraft that do not care for Russia, in other cases a missile will fail.

            S-200 has already grumbled on IL. And before that (well, really under the control of ukrov) on the Tu-154.
      4. 0
        21 August 2019 22: 22
        The Turks are now completely NIZZZA, they stick out for s-400 immeasurably!
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. +1
      21 August 2019 21: 01
      Quote: Svarog
      Neither Moscow nor Washington currently confirms this statement.

      That is enough.
      On Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted at Israel’s role in striking, saying that "Iran has no immunity - nowhere."
      If Iran is an organism without immunity, and Israel is a bacterium, then Iran will look for an antibiotic and one day it will find it.
      1. 0
        21 August 2019 22: 13
        Quote: Jura
        Iran will look for an antibiotic and one day it will find it.

        And Israel ALREADY there is a PROBIOTIC.
    7. 0
      21 August 2019 22: 44
      Have you recorded Iran as an ally of Russia? Yes, let them hammer each other, then what’s the matter to you.
  2. -6
    21 August 2019 20: 06
    This is all a lie. Russia could not substitute its partner.
    1. 0
      21 August 2019 22: 19
      Quote: Valerik1337
      Russia could not substitute its partner

      Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said:
      "Iran is not our ally, we care about the security of Israel"
      And now, POINT
      1. +3
        21 August 2019 22: 26
        Quote: Vitaly Gusin
        Iran is not our ally, we care about the security of Israel

        Actually, he spoke a little differently.
        “We are in no way neglecting the importance of the measures needed to ensure Israel's very lasting security,” he said.
        According to him, Israeli security is one of the top priorities for the current Russian government.
        "The Israelis know this, the US knows it, everyone else knows it, including the Iranians, the Turks and the Syrian government. This is one of Russia's priorities," he added about Israeli security.
        He refuted the claim that his country is an ally of Iran in Syria.
        "I would not call it allied relations, we are only cooperating (with Iran) in Syria," Ryabkov said.
      2. 0
        22 August 2019 03: 34
        Quote: Vitaly Gusin
        Quote: Valerik1337
        Russia could not substitute its partner

        Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said:
        "Iran is not our ally, we care about the security of Israel"
        And now, POINT

        And therefore we protect Syria! And now the point!
        1. +2
          22 August 2019 06: 17
          Quote: 1976AG
          And therefore we protect Syria! And now the point!

          As you yourself understand, not from Israel.
          1. +1
            22 August 2019 15: 01
            Quote: Vitaly Gusin
            Quote: 1976AG
            And therefore we protect Syria! And now the point!

            As you yourself understand, not from Israel.

            As you understand, Israel is now far from the main threat to Syria
            1. +1
              22 August 2019 16: 31
              Quote: 1976AG
              As you understand, Israel is now far from the main threat to Syria

              NOW I AGREE WITH YOU
    2. 0
      22 August 2019 03: 37
      We have such partners that we will not grieve for any of them. Whom we protect is another matter, and here we have our own interests.
  3. +3
    21 August 2019 20: 07
    allegedly
    Why not have US partners. Israel is an even greater partner.
  4. +5
    21 August 2019 20: 14
    Everything in life can be, but to believe something in London, it’s absolutely stupid to be!
  5. +6
    21 August 2019 20: 14
    Asharq Al-Awsat - The newspaper is published in London, Marseille, New York, Frankfurt, Casablanca, Cairo, Dubai and Beirut, as well as in Saudi Arabia - Riyadh, Jeddah and Dahran.

    The founder of the newspaper is Hashim Ali Hafez (died in 2006 year), a citizen of Saudi Arabia.

    The editor-in-chief of Al-Sharq Al-Ausat is Tariq Al-Humeyd.

    The newspaper is part of the largest publishing and financial holding in the Middle East - the Saudi research and marketing group. The leading position in the list of its owners is occupied by the family of Prince Ahmed bin Salman, who owns more than 30% of the shares. Al-Sharq Al-Ausat is chaired by the Governing Council. Its composition almost completely repeats the composition of the Administrative Council of the Saudi Research and Marketing Group, headed by Prince Faisal bin Salman. The only difference between the Governing Council of the newspaper and the Governing Body of the newspaper publishing company is that there is a brother of the founder of the newspaper, Mohammed Ali Hafez, on the Governing Council.

    Al-Sharq Al-Ausat bureaus operate in several Saudi cities - Riyadh, Jeddah and Dammam, as well as in Cairo (Egypt), Amman (Jordan), Beirut (Lebanon) and Rabat (Morocco).

    A special place among Al-Sharq Al-Awsat’s representative offices is occupied by its “Palestinian bureau” with correspondent offices in Ramallah and Gaza, as well as in Jerusalem and Tell Aviv. The newspaper was the first Arab print publication to establish correspondent offices in Israel.

    The publication has a significant representation in Washington, which covers both the United States and Canada, and the United Nations. An equally powerful office in Brussels.

    From 1989 of the year and for ten years, an identical bureau, which extended its activities to other post-Soviet states, existed in Moscow. Now in Moscow only the Al-Sharq Al-Ausat correspondent works.

    Among the authors of the newspaper, leading their own column, are natives of Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, Sudan, Mauritania, Iran and Tunisia. Among them, a significant proportion of Saudi citizens.

    Al-Sharq Al-Awsat is the only Arabic-language publication that has the right to publish Arabic copyrights, the Washington Post and USA Today.

    Honestly, I would be careful to unconditionally trust the materials printed by this newspaper.
  6. +4
    21 August 2019 20: 16
    Tehran allegedly gave the militias Fateh-110-Zolfaqar and Zelzal missiles, which have a range of 200-700 km, which posed a threat to both Saudi Arabia and Israel.
    We are firmly convinced that it is possible .., we are absolutely sure with Hiley Likely .. All these are extremely serious threats to the existence of the state, with a certain degree of probability, therefore it must be destroyed. good I hope the Russian missiles do not threaten them yet, otherwise I’m afraid of something. laughing
  7. -2
    21 August 2019 20: 26
    Quote: Svarog
    Moscow and Washington decided not to impede Israeli strikes in Iraq and Syria when they are “vital to the security of this country.” Also, Israel will not be prevented from tracking Iranian activities in the region. Neither Moscow nor Washington currently confirms this statement.

    The fact that Moscow does not refute such statements is that alarming ..

    Why does it seem strange to you.
    We must not forget that on both sides, both the states and Russia have repeatedly stated at a serious level that the security of the Jewish state is, firstly, one of the key issues in the BV that both states fully support (I think it’s clear what this means in translation from the language diplomacy). Secondly, this is one of not many points on which the opinions of politicians and military of the USA and the Russian Federation coincide.
    1. -2
      21 August 2019 20: 32
      Quote: Shahno
      Secondly, this is one of not many points on which the opinions of politicians and military of the USA and the Russian Federation coincide.

      If this is really so ... then it looks very strange and suggests that we can lose the only strong ally in the BV, which will ultimately lead to the surrender of the whole BV.
      1. 0
        21 August 2019 20: 33
        Quote: Svarog
        we can lose the only strong ally in BV

        Svarog, who did you manage to accept as allies there? wink laughing
        1. +1
          21 August 2019 20: 41
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          Quote: Svarog
          we can lose the only strong ally in BV

          Svarog, who did you manage to accept as allies there?

          I remember even you called Iran allies when they helped Assad .. I have a good memory wassat And now I look the wind in the other direction blew?
          1. -3
            21 August 2019 20: 47
            Quote: Svarog
            even you called Iran allies

            Well, if only by hard drunk ... and I, unfortunately, do not drink request

            Quote: Svarog
            I have a good memory

            Yeah ... girlish. I forgot whom I gave (s) wink

            Quote: Svarog
            I look the wind in the other direction blew?

            I don’t know where you are looking, and why. And Iran is quite an independent player in the BV, and there are no allies there.

            And, by the way, the graters of Iran with Israel are purely their personal affair. When (if) you understand this, some things will become more accessible to your understanding. Yes
    2. 0
      22 August 2019 03: 39
      Does Iraq bother you? I am not here, I am out. That's when we’ll finish with Idlib, then we'll see who is next in line.
  8. +1
    21 August 2019 20: 30
    Most likely it is. Iranian kookies are straining not only Israel and the SA, but also Syria and Russia. If you can calm them down a little with the hands of Israel, then why not
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. 0
    21 August 2019 20: 50
    [quote = Svarog] [/ quote] The fact that Moscow does not refute such statements is something alarming .. [/ quote]

    A lot of honor. But in fact, Israel almost always does not comment on certain messages about the actions of its army.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    21 August 2019 21: 31
    London Asharq al-Awsat Arabic edition claims

    The Skripals theme faded. We need a new fake. Even so shitty for them will do. Hiley Likely Another. lol lol
  13. -1
    21 August 2019 21: 32
    The headline is provocative with reference to London Gazeta owned by Faisal bin Salman, a member of the Saudi royal family ...
    And what we have, the Shiites live in the SA precisely in the areas of the fields and the high-quality militarization of the Shiites worries many except Russia, plus talk about the resurrection in ISIS - as a result, without Russia there are enough people interested in weakening the Shiites in terms of "accounting", but these are temporary measures reflecting global processes ...
  14. +2
    21 August 2019 21: 56
    Most likely fake news with the goal of driving a wedge between us and Iran, Israel is here in the role of a spear point and Americans dominate this release may be due to rumors about the deployment of our bases in Iran on the coast
  15. -1
    21 August 2019 22: 28
    Israel has long wanted to move to Ukraine, the sands that I. Stalin allocated to them have long become boring.
    1. 0
      21 August 2019 22: 43
      Quote: Guards turn
      those sands that I. Stalin allocated to them have long become boring.

      There is no Stalin, no sand.
      And there is a blossoming Israel

      And Ukrainians live in Ukraine; otherwise they have already barred all of Israel
      1. -1
        22 August 2019 08: 26
        IF THERE IS IN THE LIGHT PARADISE IS THE KRASNODAR REGION!
    2. 0
      21 August 2019 23: 11
      Quote: Guards turn
      Israel has long wanted to move to Ukraine, the sands that I. Stalin allocated to them have long become boring.

      Here soon Ukraine will move to Israel. All the same, it is necessary to limit the guest workers a bit. From Russia, too, illegal immigrants began to come across, although they cannot be compared with the number of Ukrainians.
    3. 0
      21 August 2019 23: 45
      Stalin has nothing to do with it, it’s just that someone will rise on real estate when Israel is merged (according to aggregated indicators, the situation is not in favor of the Jews), like its time on repatriates (Aliyah) ...
      1. +1
        22 August 2019 05: 26
        The alignment is just very much in their favor in all directions. And many false prophets have already predicted to merge them, but so far no one has succeeded in merging them. And this probability decreases every year because Israel is only growing stronger, and its enemies are weakening.
        1. 0
          22 August 2019 10: 53
          You can’t argue against demography, and apartheid is not an option ...
          for Israel is only growing stronger, and its enemies are weakening.

          Somewhere I heard it, I remembered, dear Leonid Ilyich: the Soviet Union goes on ... with fraternal socialist countries
    4. 0
      22 August 2019 03: 41
      Quote: Guards turn
      Israel has long wanted to move to Ukraine, the sands that I. Stalin allocated to them have long become boring.

      And in the Donbass ... Let them work at least sometimes
      1. 0
        22 August 2019 05: 21
        > Let them work sometimes
        “By the way, they turn the desert into a blooming garden.” And they do it not sometimes, but constantly. But what good are you doing at least sometimes?
  16. +3
    21 August 2019 22: 46
    Neither Iran, nor Turkey, nor anyone else are our sneers, so let them tan each other how much strength is enough - less people - more oxygen!
  17. 0
    21 August 2019 22: 48
    This does not directly relate to the topic, but Izvestia now has some oddity:
    “The tragedy that occurred in the White Sea, unfortunately, claimed the lives of our specialists. .... According to Putin, the new systems were tested jointly with foreign partners, including American ones.


    What does it mean??? Or instead of "together with ..." you need to read "" at the same time and ... "??

    https://iz.ru/912730/2019-08-21/putin-rasskazal-ob-obstanovke-posle-vzryva-na-poligone-pod-arkhangelskom
    1. +1
      22 August 2019 03: 42
      Quote: Michael Drabkin
      This does not directly relate to the topic, but Izvestia now has some oddity:
      “The tragedy that occurred in the White Sea, unfortunately, claimed the lives of our specialists. .... According to Putin, the new systems were tested jointly with foreign partners, including American ones.


      What does it mean??? Or instead of "together with ..." you need to read "" at the same time and ... "??

      https://iz.ru/912730/2019-08-21/putin-rasskazal-ob-obstanovke-posle-vzryva-na-poligone-pod-arkhangelskom

      This means do not believe everything that they write.
  18. 0
    22 August 2019 01: 18
    It's funny to read how so many people write that "this can't be" and "don't agree to the source." And themselves out of the blue are sure that there are no agreements. Putin met with Netanyahu many times. And in general, this is the only explanation that puts everything in its place. No matter how painful a patriot is.
    1. +1
      22 August 2019 03: 45
      Quote: Andrey Andrey
      It's funny to read how so many people write that "this can't be" and "don't agree to the source." And themselves out of the blue are sure that there are no agreements. Putin met with Netanyahu many times. And in general, this is the only explanation that puts everything in its place. No matter how painful a patriot is.

      But the patriots are not hurt, just Syria can not now confront everyone at once. Finish with Idlib, then take the rest. The landfill should not stand idle, and the weapon should rust.
  19. 0
    22 August 2019 05: 19
    If Russia is not opposed to Israeli strikes against Iranians on the territory of Syria, then it is even more likely that Russia will have more Israeli strikes against Israel in Iraq. It’s as clear as twice two four. In addition, if the Russian Federation and the United States both recognized Iran as an aggressor against Israel (and Russia's attitude to Israeli attacks on Iranians in Syria confirms this), then do not cry if the aggressor is shortened. Share it with him.