Iran showed a new domestic radar, created on the basis of the Russian

Iran has created a new radar station (radar) Falagh, designed to track ballistic and cruise missiles, as well as drones. This was reported by the Iranian news agency Mehr.

The new Iranian Falagh radar was presented on Saturday 10 August by Iran’s Air Defense Brigadier General Alirez Sabahi Fadh. It was created on the basis of the Gamma-DE surveillance radar delivered to Russia by Iran. According to the general, the sanctions imposed by the USA do not allow obtaining spare parts for Russian equipment, so it was decided to create a domestic radar based on it.

Iranian experts installed a domestic component base on the radar and gave it the name Falagh. The new surveillance radar is designed to track ballistic, cruise missiles, drones and can be integrated into the country's air defense system in conjunction with existing C-300 radars.

Once again, the brave young generation from the air defense of the army successfully went through an alien system that had not been used for a long time. They performed a difficult task that the manufacturers of this system could not cope with.

- declared the general.

As EADaily previously reported, the Iranian Ministry of Defense on June 9 this year introduced a new Khordad-15 medium-range air defense system. New SAM is able to detect Aviation enemy within a radius of 150 km, inconspicuous aerial platforms - up to 85 km. The affected area, depending on the type of target, can reach 45 km.

In addition, at the celebration of the Day of Defense Industry, which is celebrated in Iran on 22 in August, the country's Ministry of Defense promises to present the national long-range air defense system Bavar-373.

Comments

[Cocaine]

I am happy for Iran! .. Not a bad system. And there’s no better Russian yet! Do not save, my advice!

[Sky strike fighter]

For the celebration of the Day of the Defense Industry, which is celebrated in Iran on August 22, the Ministry of Defense of the country promises to present the national long-range air defense system "Bavar-373".

By the way, Iranians say that at the Bavar-373 air defense system they surpassed the characteristics of the S-300, although they admit that they did this air defense system based on the S-300, but they improved in terms of performance and made them cheaper.

The Bavar 373 Iranian system is indeed considered an analogue of the Russian S-300 air defense systems, however, a number of sources claim that the Iranian military was able to significantly improve this air defense system by increasing the effective range of hitting aerodynamic targets (presumably up to 320-350 kilometers - approx. )

http://avia.pro/news/iran-nashyol-zamenu-dorogim-rossiyskim-s-300?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com

[dvina71]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

By the way, Iranians say that at the Bavar-373 air defense system they surpassed the characteristics of the S-300

Outperform the export option ... well Moldovans ... what ..

[Cocaine]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

By the way, Iranians say that at the Bavar-373 air defense system they surpassed the characteristics of the S-300, although they admit that they did this air defense system based on the S-300, but they improved in terms of performance and made them cheaper.

You never know what they say. The reaction of your Israel, says a lot ..
All these systems are tied to Russian developments ..!

[Sky strike fighter]

The reaction of your Israel, says a lot ..

????? !! I don’t understand. How do I relate to Israel? Since when did Israel suddenly become mine?

[Pajamas]

Congratulations on your acquisition of Israel! and if according to the article, the general said: - "They completed a difficult task that the manufacturers of this system could not cope with." This is ridiculous with which the manufacturers who successfully created the S-400 and S-500 could not cope. So what they say in Iran is dust in the eyes.

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Iranians say that at the Bavar-373 air defense system they surpassed the characteristics of the S-300, although they admit that they did this air defense system based on the S-300

This all needs serious verification.
The missile range could be increased by a threefold reduction in warhead mass with a corresponding increase in fuel mass. Plus, with a decrease in the speed of the rocket at the far boundary of the defeat.
What happened there with the probability of hitting the target, allah alone knows. Plus the question, with what parameters of the target is this range.

[Romario_Argo]

admit that they did this air defense system based on C-300

Iranians are cunning here for propaganda purposes
if we compare with C-300PMU1 where the channel is 6 CU, then the Bavar-373 air defense system has a channel in 36 CU like C-300PMU2, which were delivered to Iran in the number of 5 divisions

[mvg]

Which of the S-300? S-300, this is the whole family, S-300PT 1975, S-300-PMU2 / V4 2007, which is different at times! Do not write nonsense in the comments.
Nobody has ever shot down aerodynamic targets at such a range (350 km). Even passenger planes or transporters.

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: mvg

Nobody has ever shot down aerodynamic targets at such a range (350 km). Even passenger planes or transporters.

Our Ukrainian brothers shot down our Tu-200 with the S-154 complex over the Black Sea at a distance of, if I am not mistaken, 320 km.

[mvg]

if not mistaken, 320 km.

You are mistaken, there were 200, 5B28 does not fly for so much .. Especially at an altitude of 10 km

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: mvg

if not mistaken, 320 km.

You are mistaken, there were 200, 5B28 does not fly for so much .. Especially at an altitude of 10 km

The S-200 air defense system is capable of capturing a target at a distance of up to 400 km, and hitting (in the S-200D version) at a distance of up to 300 km. And taking into account overcoming 200 km on sustainer engines (at a speed of 1700 m / s) and further controlled flight along a descending trajectory (from a height of, for example, 40 km), the S-200V air defense missile system also easily "reaches" targets for 300 km.

the exact coordinates of the fall of the aircraft: 42,11 degrees north latitude and 37,37 degrees east longitude
Distance to launch point - 270km

[mvg]

The S-200V air defense missile system also easily "reaches" targets for 300 km.

According to the passport 5B28 only 255 km .. this is from the wiki. Technically, I think less .. About the plane .. not everything is so clear .. The rocket explosion should have been 780 meters from the plane, it would not have fallen .. muddy story. And they fired at the target "Reis", 55 km from the air defense system. There were the top bosses .. well, would they really put a "monkey" behind the tumblers, because these are awards and stars .. for correct teachings .. And for the S-200, look at Syria ... 1000 (one thousand) 7 tons of rockets, and that's it in "milk" .. Not cheap.

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: mvg

About the plane .. not everything is so clear.

Do you think they blew themselves up or the air conditioner was not working?

[mvg]

There is a version about the terrorist attack. Passengers have carbon monoxide and traces of explosives in their airways. But the plane was never raised. Deep, plus silt up to 6 m thick
And, interestingly, the Jews were not indignant .. And there are almost half of them.

[abc_alex]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

By the way, Iranians say that at the Bavar-373 air defense system they surpassed the characteristics of the S-300, although they admit that they did this air defense system based on the S-300, but they improved in terms of performance and made them cheaper.

Well, why not? S-300, it’s different sometimes, if the base was an export sample of the first years of production, they could. And they could do cheaper too, they can only operate with the commercial price of the export sample.
And the complex has a lot of characteristics, for example, mass, deployment time, etc.

[Vadivak]

Quote: Kokain

I am happy for Iran! .

Stop smoking all sorts of rubbish

[Dagon]

I doubt that the Russian radar "Gamma" is manufactured on a domestic basis, maybe 20 percent and there is a domestic one (hardware, harnesses, etc.). Most likely they sold technology to Iran or maybe even documentation and helped in organizing production, and they began to churn out ...

[Valery Valery]

designed to track ballistic and cruise missiles, as well as drones.

It doesn’t happen! So that all at once - one radar!

[Vita vko]

Quote: Valery Valery

It doesn’t happen! So that all at once - one radar!

Unfortunately, this only happens in Russia. Gamma-DE, despite the fact that it was developed in the early 2000s, is still a unique fully solid-state radar with AFAR and air-cooled. Its close analogues were only in the USA AN / FPS-117 and a truncated clone of the Spanish L-band radar L-band. At one time, he carefully studied the technology and combat use of Gamma-DE, even talked with the designers, but didn’t understand for what reasons the Russian Defense Ministry did not launch them in a series, preferring Gamma-C1, which is the name of the flying HEADLAND significantly both in terms of performance and technology level.

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: Vita VKO

Gamma-DE ... The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation did not launch them in a series, preferring Gamma-C1, which is the name of the flying headlamp significantly inferior to Gamma-DE both in terms of performance characteristics and in terms of technology

Why didn’t we accept Gamma-DE? Most likely, the equipment was western, the ability to repeat it with us is zero. From that and did not accept.
If so, then it becomes clear why Iran could not get spare parts from the Russian Federation.
Alone, without Chinese electronics, the Iranians could not restore this radar.
Although I don’t want Medvedev-Manturov-Chemezov and others to restore the domestic production of electronic components, I will have to.
Nowhere to go.

[mvg]

by the way, restore domestic production of electronic components, but

And is there something to restore? Yes, they never knew how ... We need to study, buy licenses, technologies, and production from China, Taiwan, India .. since we can do it ourselves. Flattening pride.

[dvina71]

Quote: Vita VKO

Radar with AFAR

Because MO AFAR rarely uses and not because of technological lag. In air defense, they try to separate the emitter and the receiver, thereby increasing survival .. The emitting radar is a target for a rocket and it is better to lose one of the emitters than one receiver.

[spectr]

At one time, he carefully studied the technology and combat use of Gamma-DE, even spoke with the designers, but did not understand for what reasons the Russian Defense Ministry did not launch them in a series, preferring Gamma-C1, which is the name of the span headlamp significantly inferior to Gamma-DE both in terms of performance and technology level.

Most likely it is the price and use of bourgeois equipment. Now the same picture. If there are two similar products and one of them costs 2-3 times cheaper with non-critical deterioration, then they will choose it.

[Paranoid50]

Once again, the brave young generation from the air defense of the army successfully went through an alien system that had not been used for a long time. They performed a difficult task, with which the manufacturers of this system could not cope

Oh how ...

[NEXUS]

Russian technologies around the world strongly interfere with mattresses to carry their democracy to unwanted countries. I think to the rulers of most countries the phrase - "you need to feed your army, so as not to feed someone else's", finally reached.

[Sky strike fighter]

It is stated that the Bavar 373 air defense system sees an F-35 penguin.

The Bavar 373 Iranian radar can detect air targets at distances of up to 300 kilometers, and, in addition to aircraft, the radar is able to detect cruise and ballistic missiles, as well as small drones. According to as yet unconfirmed data, the radar is also capable of detecting stealth aircraft, which makes it an effective means of combating F-22 and F-35 fighters, which, incidentally, were recently discovered near the Iranian borders.

http://avia.pro/news/iran-sozdal-sistemu-pvo-prevoshodyashchuyu-s-300

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

It is stated that the Bavar 373 air defense system sees an F-35 penguin.

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

http://avia.pro/news/iran-sozdal-sistemu-pvo-prevoshodyashchuyu-s-300

I will give only one example about avia.pro
2019-07-02 published an article:
One of the Syrian air defense missile systems, the C-300, was damaged as a result of an Israeli attack.
Read more at: http://avia.pro/news/stalo-izvestno-o-povrezhdenii-odnogo-iz-siriyskih-s-300
And the photo is given:

Open:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFYxee_40eI
And from 0:21 to 0:27 we stop.
And we understand that this article FAKE!
And this is not the only case.

[knn54]

"They have completed a daunting task that the manufacturers of this system have failed to meet."
Worthy of respect.

[dvina71]

Judging by the photo .. Iran buys paint in Yaroslavl ..

[Cocaine]

Quote: dvina71

Judging by the photo .. Iran buys paint in Yaroslavl ..

Iran now buys everything from us ..
They are all in sanctions and we hehe

[Sky strike fighter]

Iran buys a lot from China. I won’t be surprised if the Chinese helped to create this Bavar-373 air defense system based on the Chinese copy (HQ-16) of our S-300. Iran previously launched the production of anti-ship missiles Gader (250 km), taking the Chinese anti-aircraft missile system as the basis 802.Do not forget that Iran began to create its own BRs on the basis of North Korean BRs, thus with the tacit consent of China, and so that no one would have any complaints against China. So that no one could say that China helps Iran, although it’s clear North Korea depends on China’s support.

[Sky strike fighter]

I won’t be surprised if the Chinese helped to create this Bavar-373 air defense system, starting from the Chinese copy (HQ-16) of our S-300.

Not HQ-16, but HQ-9. I apologize for the mistake. HQ-16 is an analogue of our Buk.
China could well help Iran again, this time with its HQ-9B technology.

the fact that the new air defense system was adopted after the purchase of the S-300 suggests an explicit connection between the HQ-9 and the S-300PMU, writes author Charlie Gao. According to him, the West is more inclined to support the Russian version, according to which the HQ-9 was developed based on the S-300.
The acquisition of S-300PMU2 anti-aircraft systems in 2004 provided China with the opportunity to further develop the HQ-9. As a result, an updated HQ-9B appeared, the range of which, according to rumors, increased to 250-300 kilometers.

https://rg.ru/2018/11/12/proryv-ili-kopiia-est-li-raznica-mezhdu-s-300-i-kitajskim-hq-9.html

[Chaldon48]

Here is an example of Iran-Russian cooperation

[Candidate of Military Sciences]

This is very good! This is very correct! I hope this is far from all!

[Amateur]

They performed a difficult task that the manufacturers of this system could not cope with.

Is this about Russian air defense developers?
Walks wide. Just as if the pants were not torn.

[Professor]

Iranian experts installed a domestic component base on the radar and gave it the name Falagh.

Chinese component base. They don’t have their own at all.

[rocket757]

Saturation of troops with airspace control tools is here.
Do not forget the means of "cleaning" this space from unwanted objects !!! Then everything will be super here .... yes, even high-quality training of specialists is very important!

[Zaurbek]

In place of Iran, it is urgent to purchase air defense systems and Radars .... and then do crafts. Above them hangs the threat of a strike by the United States and Israel.

[Reserve buildbat]

"Once again, the brave young generation from the army's air defense successfully sorted out someone else's system, which had not been used for a long time. They completed a difficult task that the manufacturers of this system could not cope with."
They performed the difficult task of making a degraded copy of the system. System manufacturers simply do not undertake such anti-tasks.

[The Siberian barber]

. Once again, the brave young generation from the air defense of the army successfully went through an alien system that had not been used for a long time. They performed a difficult task that the manufacturers of this system could not cope with.

after all, among the southern peoples, boasting / pathos mixed with lies, in blood

[Candidate of Military Sciences]

It is a fact................

[Vladimir Nizhegorodsky]

North Korea and China helped them, but they themselves will have to repel the aggression and provocation of other countries.
So it’s necessary to check their crafts and specialists are needed.
Our equipment has already passed the test of time and in real combat situations.

[Old26]

Quote: Captain Pushkin

This all needs serious verification.
The missile range could be increased by a threefold reduction in warhead mass with a corresponding increase in fuel mass. Plus, with a decrease in the speed of the rocket at the far boundary of the defeat.
What happened there with the probability of hitting the target, allah alone knows. Plus the question, with what parameters of the target is this range.

Peter! By itself, the missile of this SAM "Bavar-373" EMNIP is smaller than the missiles of the S-300 system. They said in Syria that they need a Syrian S-300 when they have their own Bavar-373. I'm afraid to be mistaken, but "Bavar" showed itself very well against Israeli aviation, without having had time to release a single missile (events of the end of last - beginning of this year). Whether the Bavar division in Syria was completely destroyed or not, it is not known Syria did not arise anymore

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Old26

I'm afraid to be mistaken, but "Bavar" showed itself very well against Israeli aviation,

As always, you were not mistaken!

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: Old26

Whether the Bavar division in Syria was completely destroyed or not is unknown

One division in this theater is not a warrior. Any system.
Only a layered air defense system under uniform control is stable.

[Old26]

Quote: Vitaly Gusin

Quote: Old26

I'm afraid to be mistaken, but "Bavar" showed itself very well against Israeli aviation,

As always, you were not mistaken!

That is, the information that “Bavar” was unable to shoot and was struck corresponds to previously circulating information?

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Old26

that the “Bavar” could not shoot

The purpose of the Israeli strike on the T-4 base in Syria was latest Iranian air defense system
The most advanced Iranian air defense system to date is the mobile anti-aircraft missile system "Bavar-373", which in Tehran is called the analogue of the Russian S-300 air defense system.

[Old26]

Quote: Vitaly Gusin

Quote: Old26

that the “Bavar” could not shoot

The purpose of the Israeli strike on the T-4 base in Syria was latest Iranian air defense system
The most advanced Iranian air defense system to date is the mobile anti-aircraft missile system "Bavar-373", which in Tehran is called the analogue of the Russian S-300 air defense system.

Got it, thanks for clarifying. Yuri Lyamin had information on this topic, but he had all the materials on the calendar, and when it was - I don’t remember exactly ....