Named the date of receipt of the airborne new armored car

61
Airborne Forces of the Russian Federation in the near future will receive a new armored car. As the Remdiesel company reported, it will be the Typhoon K4386.





New armored car "Typhoon" K4386 in the very near future should go to the Airborne Forces. It is expected that a machine specially designed for the Airborne Forces will enter the armed forces no later than 2020.

The company draws attention to the fact that Typhoon K4386 successfully passes both production and state testing program. Serious shortcomings in their course is not revealed. The press service notes the discovery of minor flaws that require minor modifications, but emphasize that this is a natural process and the car has not undergone major changes.

TASS, referring to its own source in the Ministry of Defense, notes that the car has yet to pass tests on military special polygons: only after this can an armored car be delivered to the troops. It is assumed that this part of the testing of the new armored vehicle will be completed in the 2019 year.

Briefly about the combat characteristics of "Typhoon Airborne"


"Typhoon Airborne" K4386 is made according to the scheme "bearing armored hull" (to reduce the weight of the developers abandoned the frame structure of the machine). The wheelbase 4x4, combined protection of ceramic armor. It can be equipped with various types of weapons on the turret installation, including the Kord heavy machine gun.

The machine has ballistic protection of the fifth class in accordance with GOST R 50963-96. Also, an armored car is able to withstand an explosion up to 6 kg in TNT equivalent under the wheel, and 4 kg under the bottom. This was reported in 2017 by the TV channel “Star».

On "Typhoon-Airborne Forces" you can install a remotely controlled module BM-30-D with a 30-mm gun. The machine is capable of parachuting from military transport aircraft aviation Aerospace Forces of the Russian Federation.

Machine weight - 13,5 tons. The KamAZ diesel engine with horsepower 350 hp serves as the power plant on the machine. Speed ​​- up to 100 kilometers per hour. The armored car is able to overcome rises with a steepness up to 30 degrees, and water barriers up to a depth of 1,9 meters. The power reserve "Typhoon Airborne" K4386 on the highway - 1200 kilometers.

Also on the basis of the new armored car developed self-propelled mortar installation "Drak". At the heart of its design is the 82-mm smooth-bore mortar "Tray". The project must also be implemented in 2020.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    3 August 2019 08: 25
    The performance characteristics are impressive, but the price is probably not small either .. I still trust the proven technology in a combat situation.
    And now you can slap everything you wish!
    Nevertheless, such a technique is needed by the Airborne Forces and there is no need to save on it soldier
    1. +1
      3 August 2019 08: 49
      Quote: Koba
      Nevertheless, such a technique is needed by the Airborne Forces and there is no need to save on it

      "Typhoon" K4386 - Russian Airborne
      1. 0
        3 August 2019 09: 20
        Quote: svp67
        Quote: Koba
        Nevertheless, such a technique is needed by the Airborne Forces and there is no need to save on it

        "Typhoon" K4386 - Russian Airborne

        I hope Sergey that it will be so .. Airborne Forces need equipment of this level hi Mobility of troops, not quantity. This is the future basis of the modern Army! soldier
        1. -1
          3 August 2019 10: 20
          Quote: Koba
          I hope Sergey that it will be so .. Airborne Forces need equipment of this level

          Judging by the changes that are happening to these troops, they are undergoing changes in our country, comparable to those that happened to them under Margelov. In a couple of years, it will be a completely different level of troops with the ability to solve similar problems with the United States Commission
          1. +2
            3 August 2019 13: 01
            Quote: svp67
            In a couple of years, it will be a completely different level of troops with the ability to solve similar problems with the United States Commission

            Alas, no. The transport fleet is aging and in general things are going pretty badly there (although there have been positive developments, pah-pah, so as not to jinx it). For the development and arrival of new transporters - for many years to come. And without transport - what comparison with the capabilities and tasks of the ILC can be discussed?
            Here at our marine corps - better recently. Even tank battalions are reviving for her. But again, landing craft (and MUCH) are wildly needed. And once the landing - and need cover. But with the pace of construction of frigates / corvettes ... In short, this ball can be unwound for a long time.
            1. +1
              3 August 2019 15: 10
              Quote: Kuroneko
              The transport fleet is getting old and in general things are going pretty bad there

              What's the problem, except for the Mi-26? MO would have had money. At least fill up the Mi-8 with our engines - you can release as much as you like. IL-76 - for God's sake, just call Ulyanovsk. Mi-24 - Rostvertol is also working. An-124 is not going to retire either.
              1. +2
                3 August 2019 15: 48
                Airborne and Mi-shki? Well, OK. What do you think of them Nona, Sprut-SD, or at least BMD-4 to parachute?
                As for the An-124 - that's what they are going to, and for good, for a long time. They are forced to renew the resource, for there is nothing to replace at the moment.
                1. 0
                  3 August 2019 20: 09
                  Quote: Kuroneko
                  Airborne and Mi-shki? Well, OK. What do you think of them Nona, Sprut-SD, or at least BMD-4 to parachute?

                  Well, these can be used from Ilov, but the turntables, including the new Mi-38 for the transfer of light forces, can be used on all kinds of "carts", the same "Drakes"
                2. 0
                  4 August 2019 10: 23
                  Quote: Kuroneko
                  Airborne and Mi-shki? Well, OK. What do you think of them Nona, Sprut-SD, or at least BMD-4 to parachute?

                  And often our Airborne Forces are parachuted? Primarily. landing troops practice.
                  As for the An-124 - that's what they are going to, and for good, for a long time.

                  Why do you think so? Quite peppy birds.
                  They are forced to renew the resource

                  All have long been switched to operational status. And this parameter they feel quite normal.
                  for there is nothing to replace at the moment.

                  The cart is in front of the horse.
            2. 0
              3 August 2019 20: 07
              Quote: Kuroneko
              And without transport workers - what kind of comparison with the capabilities and tasks of the ILC can we talk about?

              And what you IL-76 bad?
              Quote: Kuroneko
              Even tank battalions for her revive.

              So in the Airborne Forces, there are already two of them, and soon they will bring up to five.
              Quote: Kuroneko
              But, again, the amphibious ships are wildly needed (and MANY).

              And the main problem, without the solution of which it is not a full-fledged marines, but also "infantry"
          2. +1
            3 August 2019 13: 11
            Quote: svp67
            Judging by the changes that are happening to these troops, they are undergoing changes in our country, comparable to those that happened to them under Margelov.

            God forbid. So that the new Uncle Vasya appears in Russia in any other way .. soldier
    2. -5
      3 August 2019 11: 52
      what the hell is he? three days ago, everyone was happy with wheezing that she came to the airborne field with a machine gun and would solve all the problems. Give the cornfield !!!
      1. 0
        3 August 2019 13: 13
        Quote: From Siberia we
        what the hell is he? three days ago, everyone was happy with wheezing that she came to the airborne field with a machine gun and would solve all the problems. Give the cornfield !!!

        There will be a Niva, what is this hysteria.? wink
        1. 0
          3 August 2019 13: 26
          Yes, because there is unification, why in the army of 100500 types of armored vehicles? There were already battalions, bears, lynxes, tigers. Now another one is undergoing tests. There are NONA, SPRUT. Bring them to mind.
          1. 0
            4 August 2019 02: 05
            Quote: From Siberia we
            Yes, because there is unification, why in the army of 100500 types of armored vehicles? There were already battalions, bears, lynxes, tees

            Indeed, a great many armored vehicles have appeared in our army and other power structures. At first, I also did not understand such a mishmash. However, now all this hash is slowly being classified and distributed by the military branches. I think that in the future this process will only be improved, moving away from randomization.
            So, offhand:
            Tiger, Lynx - in the ground forces
            Typhoon - in the airborne
            Shot, Bulat - in the Strategic Rocket Forces and border guards.
            Falcous - in the FSB
            Highlander - to Rosguard.
            I think that is correct. It is not yet clear what the Marines will throw, what needs to be added to the border guards and what will go to the MTR.
    3. -1
      3 August 2019 12: 22
      Is the price big? Consider this an injection of government money into production. Licking they in the pockets of some people did not disperse.
  2. -1
    3 August 2019 08: 27
    Good machine needed for the airborne. I wonder if they are tested in Syria?
  3. +1
    3 August 2019 08: 31
    This turns out to be a crossover, the main difference between which and a full-fledged SUV is a carrying body. Just like a short Niva, by the way, it is the ancestor of all crossovers.
    1. -1
      3 August 2019 11: 53
      Now the Niva crossover, and soon the West will become a jeep
  4. -9
    3 August 2019 08: 37
    The airborne troops need not ceramic armored vehicles weighing 13,5 kg, but transport helicopters with a capacity of one compartment.

    It makes no sense to protect the armored car from 6 kg of explosives, since no one will prevent the enemy from putting 7 kg of explosives.
    1. +9
      3 August 2019 08: 51
      Quote: Operator
      It makes no sense to protect the armored car from 6 kg of explosives, since no one will prevent the enemy from putting 7 kg of explosives

      What protection do you consider sufficient? After all, based on your assumptions, no one will stop him from putting 10 and 15 and ... kg
      1. +1
        3 August 2019 09: 29
        In my opinion this is a pointless question. Powerful armor means low mobility and, as a result, turning the machine into a mess.
      2. -4
        3 August 2019 09: 37
        Quote: Piramidon
        What protection do you consider sufficient?

        The transition ВFar East on airmobile transport.
        1. -1
          3 August 2019 10: 17
          Quote: Operator
          Quote: Piramidon
          What protection do you consider sufficient?

          The transition ВFar East on airmobile transport.

          So they can also bring him down. There is no absolutely protected and safe means of transportation. The "duel of armor and shell" is ongoing.
    2. -1
      3 August 2019 11: 54
      Think politically dear. Here cheers patriots zaminusut.
  5. +3
    3 August 2019 09: 30
    And how does it differ from Typhoon air defense ??? But why did they push him to China for exercises, they already attacked him with a tape measure)))


    1. +2
      3 August 2019 10: 18
      Quote: loki565
      But why did they push him to China for exercises, they already attacked him with a tape measure)))

      With photocopy and 3D printer. laughing
  6. 0
    3 August 2019 10: 48
    Quote: Piramidon
    Duel of armor and shell

    I’m talking about another fight - with mines (even tank armor does not save from shells).
    Plus landing bonuses when switching from armored cars to helicopters - a tenfold decrease in travel time, independence from the presence of roads, terrain and ground conditions.
    1. 0
      3 August 2019 11: 56
      Forgot will add that in order to bring down the helicopter it is necessary to guard it, and set the mine and forgot it.
      1. -1
        3 August 2019 15: 30
        Quote: From Siberia we
        Forgot will add that in order to bring down the helicopter it is necessary to guard it, and set the mine and forgot it.

        Mina was placed on one road, and he took and drove along another. Moreover, this is an SUV.
        1. +1
          3 August 2019 15: 33
          Yeah, an SUV weighing 13 tons on wheels. Guys from the off-road don't accidentally talk about it.
          1. -2
            3 August 2019 15: 36
            Quote: From Siberia we
            Yeah, an SUV weighing 13 tons on wheels.

            Tank and armored personnel carriers weigh more and do not bother with the presence of autobahns.
            1. +1
              3 August 2019 15: 38
              The tank has a caterpillar. And how many wheels does an armored personnel carrier have? What about BRDM?
            2. -2
              3 August 2019 15: 40
              And when this armored personnel carrier began to weigh more than 13 tons
              1. +1
                3 August 2019 15: 54
                Quote: From Siberia we
                And when this armored personnel carrier began to weigh more than 13 tons

                BTR-80 - 13,6 t.
                1. +1
                  3 August 2019 15: 56
                  And eight wheels versus 4. The specific ground pressure is half as much. And by the way, the BTR 80 is floating.
                  1. +1
                    3 August 2019 16: 29
                    Quote: From Siberia we
                    And eight wheels versus 4. The specific ground pressure is half as much. And by the way, the BTR 80 is floating.

                    You asked to name an APC heavier than 13 tons. No more no less. Now don't complain.
                    1. +1
                      3 August 2019 16: 30
                      I agree laughing
                      1. 0
                        3 August 2019 16: 32
                        By the way, I do not like the 13,6-ton 8-wheel - get the 6-wheel AMX-10 weighing 16+ tons. French wheeled tank.
                      2. -2
                        3 August 2019 16: 37
                        I just like the 8 wheels. the Frenchman has such a gun in my opinion is superfluous. although the Papuans drive ...
                      3. +2
                        3 August 2019 16: 52
                        Quote: From Siberia we
                        I just like the 8 wheels. the Frenchman has such a gun in my opinion is superfluous. although the Papuans drive ...

                        Among the ammunition is a cumulative projectile. So, if the "Papuans", then in very seriously armored loincloths.
                      4. -2
                        3 August 2019 16: 55
                        This is for your own peace of mind. I think so when missed by such an armored target, a second shell is unlikely to be needed. unless he had time to escape.
                      5. +1
                        3 August 2019 17: 21
                        Quote: From Siberia we
                        This is for your own peace of mind. I think so when missed by such an armored target, a second shell is unlikely to be needed. unless he had time to escape.

                        Will there be a blunder? But that is not the point. In the end, towed anti-tank guns are still used, and they have even less protection and maneuverability.
              2. -1
                3 August 2019 16: 19
                Quote: From Siberia we
                And when this armored personnel carrier began to weigh more than 13 tons

                BTR-80 13,6 tons, and BTR-90 in general 22 tons.
                1. 0
                  4 August 2019 02: 11
                  Quote: Piramidon
                  BTR-90 in general 22 t.

                  "Sprout" was written off for scrap. It's a pity. By the way, his maneuverability was amazing
          2. 0
            3 August 2019 16: 56
            Yeah, an SUV weighing 13 tons on wheels. Guys from the off-road don't accidentally talk about it.

            Yeah, you better tell the guys "KAMAZ-master")))
            Wheel formula - 4 × 4
            Weight parameters and loads, a / m
            Curb vehicle weight, kg - 9500
            Gross weight, kg - 10800

            1. -1
              3 August 2019 16: 59
              Quote: loki565
              Yeah, you better tell the guys "KAMAZ-master"

              And you show me on what clay soils the Kamaz master passes, or in the snow 90 cm deep, where he forces water obstacles.
              1. +1
                3 August 2019 17: 17
                Google "Silk Road" there is mud and river formation, and there is also a video on the snow.
                By the way, sandy soil is considered one of the most difficult.
                1. -1
                  3 August 2019 17: 24
                  17 minutes of your video output. all get stuck.
      2. +2
        3 August 2019 15: 39
        Quote: From Siberia we
        Forgot will add that in order to bring down the helicopter it is necessary to guard it, and set the mine and forgot it.

        There are anti-helicopter mines too.
        1. -1
          3 August 2019 15: 42
          Do not specify the price of this device? And how common they are. I have not met them in 25 years.
          1. +1
            3 August 2019 15: 59
            Quote: From Siberia we
            Do not specify the price of this device?

            Unfortunately, not in the know. But what does this have to do with it? I just showed that mines are also threatening the helicopter. And they can be put-and-forgotten too. And the staff officers are aware that there are not only tank-hazardous directions, but also helicopter-hazardous ones - a helicopter flying on a PMA cannot enter from all directions. So, the high cost of mines does not play a decisive role here - they are not needed in the same quantities as anti-personnel or anti-tank ones. And in any case, they are several orders of magnitude cheaper than a helicopter and those / who / what it transports, and you can "go broke" for a hundred or two.
            I have not met them in 25 years.

            Everything, the issue has been resolved - the FDA does not exist. :)
            1. 0
              3 August 2019 16: 06
              There are FDA who argue. However, they did not receive mass distribution. unlike other types. So you didn’t answer my question. Why in the army are there so many diverse equipment of the same class?
              1. 0
                3 August 2019 16: 35
                Quote: From Siberia we
                There are FDA who argue. However, they did not receive mass distribution. unlike other types.

                Because there are fewer helicopters than tanks.
                So you didn’t answer my question. Why in the army are there so many diverse equipment of the same class?

                I do not know. This question is in the wrong place. Apparently, you confused me with my namesake with a surname starting with the letter "Ш".
    2. -1
      3 August 2019 15: 32
      Quote: Operator
      I'm talking about another fight - with mines (from shells even tank armor does not save)

      This is a figurative expression. "A duel of armor and a projectile." Can't you see the quotes?
  7. +2
    3 August 2019 16: 37
    Typhoon is an armored car. In essence ersatz. And not about mines. Personally, I saw an APC which, with 2 front wheels torn off along with the hubs, crawled along the virgin lands. The typhoon will not go anywhere after an explosion of 6 kg. And if a miner with fatasia, then these 6 kg will simply halve the car. 4 kg under the bottom holds it well, but if a directed explosion? Will stand? And there is no exact information about the price. And inaccurate typhoon is more expensive than BTR 82. At the same time, it has almost no advantages in armor and minuses in cross-country ability. Is this ersatz needed in the troops?
    1. +1
      3 August 2019 16: 38
      This is just another cut of money.
      1. +2
        3 August 2019 16: 41
        Maybe so. I do not understand how the non-floating equipment managed to shove into the airborne.
        1. +1
          3 August 2019 16: 50
          Good lobby and all business. Money rules the world.
    2. +3
      3 August 2019 16: 57
      Quote: garri-lin
      if a miner with fatasia, then these 6 kg will simply halve the car.

      Of course, I am a purely civilian person, but ... Indeed, the miner must have a very perverted imagination in order to put such stunts in their own rear. The Airborne Forces, as far as I know, are intended mainly to work behind enemy lines.
      1. 0
        3 August 2019 20: 20
        In modern conditions, not only behind enemy lines. And 6 kg in T. E. This value is conditional and honestly not clear. Anti-tank more anti-personnel less. IEDs will do so to hit the target and do with a margin. And the miner's fantasy can be different. A mine with directional detonation, if correctly done, ignores the V-shaped bottom and much more. And if 6 pieces of cumulative funnels are formed by a daisy, then just do Khan to any transport.