In China, TOS-1A called "the most terrible Russian weapons"

98
In China, the TOL-1A Solneptek flamethrower system was rated. According to the author, this is the worst thing. weapon Russia, able to destroy the "whole village" for 7 seconds. This edition writes Sina.

In China, TOS-1A called "the most terrible Russian weapons"




Chinese magazine Sina believes the TOS-1A heavy flamethrower system is "the worst Russian weapon." Although it is called "flamethrower a tank", the system itself has nothing to do with it, except for the platform on which it was created - it is a multi-barrel missile launcher firing thermobaric or incendiary shells at a distance of up to 12 km. Combat capabilities of the Russian heavy flamethrower system, which entered into service of the Russian army about ten years ago, still remain unsurpassed.

The reason for creating a flamethrower system TOC-1A, the newspaper writes, was the sad experience of street fighting in Grozny, where the Russian army suffered heavy losses. In the conditions of a city where the conduct of combat is limited to strong defensive structures, conventional armored vehicles become useless, while the use of “vacuum” explosions increases the effectiveness of street battles.

TOC-1A is capable of firing off all the available missiles within 7 seconds. This time is quite enough to destroy the whole small village, the author writes, while the use of thermobaric ammunition leads to the destruction of all living things, even hiding under the ground.

Dull-looking machine has great firepower. This is really the worst Russian weapon, concludes a Chinese journalist.
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    15 July 2019 12: 12
    We are waiting for the appearance of an analogue in the PLA
    1. +13
      15 July 2019 13: 08
      Honestly, the PLA does not expect an analogue from the word at all. And I do not want him to appear.
      1. +7
        15 July 2019 13: 15
        Yes, I don’t want to either. But they will not ask anyone.
    2. 0
      15 July 2019 13: 48
      Quote: Sergey39
      We are waiting for the appearance of an analogue in the PLA

      Afraid. TOS-1A really very specific weapon, actually a weapon of the brave
      1. +1
        15 July 2019 13: 56
        If memory serves, the predecessor of Solntsepek had a beautiful name - Pinocchio))). And who was the main enemy of Pinocchio? Very bearded gentleman)) terrorists, shave your beards!
        1. +5
          15 July 2019 13: 58
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          And who was the main enemy of Pinocchio? Very bearded gentleman)) terrorists, shave your beards!

          Will not help. Allah will sort them not by beards, but by deeds.
      2. +4
        15 July 2019 13: 59
        China appreciated the TOS-1A "Solntsepek" heavy flame-throwing system. According to the author of the article, this is the most terrible weapon in Russia, capable of destroying "an entire village" in 7 seconds.

        They don’t know ... For the first time they met him at Damansky in 1969 (according to eyewitnesses):
        Two hours later, having spent ammunition, the Soviet border guards still had to withdraw from the island. It became clear that the forces introduced into the battle were not enough, and the Chinese significantly outnumbered the border guards. At 17:00 in a critical situation, in violation of the instructions of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU, do not bring Soviet troops into conflict, on the orders of Lieutenant General Oleg Losik, commander of the troops of the Far Eastern Military District fire was fired from the then-secret multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) BM-21 Grad of the 135th Motorized Rifle Division. Shells destroyed most of the material and technical resources the Chinese group and the military, including reinforcements, mortars, and stacks of shells.

        It was thermobaric ammunition that was secret ...
        soldier
        1. +3
          15 July 2019 14: 03
          Quote: ROSS 42
          It was thermobaric ammunition that was secret ...

          Not really. MLRS has a VERY interesting effect - "the imposition of explosions", and if you add incendiary ammunition to this, then the effect on the accumulation of infantry will be very significant, cleaner than Orsha
          1. 0
            15 July 2019 14: 30
            Quote: svp67
            Not quite.

            At all or not at all, but I made a reservation: (according to eyewitnesses). It was a person who was directly involved ...
            By the way, when were the CBTs officially adopted? In the mid-80s. And the shells existed before ...
            The first T-80 I saw in 1979 at the Bobochinsky training ground near Vyborg. There was also a demonstration of a (then still secret) film about the new F-16 ...
        2. 0
          15 July 2019 18: 11
          Quote: ROSS 42
          It was thermobaric ammunition that was secret ...
          -bike ...
          the imposition of a large number of almost simultaneous explosions
          Absolutely different explosions - at Grad (dragged head over heels on an urgent basis) and at TOS

          Quote: ROSS 42
          1979 year at the Bobochinsky training ground near Vyborg. There was also a demonstration of a (then still secret) film about the new F-16
          -Our intelligence stole info about an airplane that:
          "Developed in 1974 by General Dynamics. Transferred into operation (!!!) in the 1979 year. "
          and then they rushed to distribute to the troops (with the risk of burning our scouts)? fool
          kaneshno believe .... yeah yeah ....
    3. Maz
      +2
      15 July 2019 18: 31
      Something there the author made up the mole that Chechnya moved this technique and demanded. Pinocchio - was tested in Afghanistan and there he showed what he was capable of.
  2. +7
    15 July 2019 12: 13
    I recalled the saying: a dagger is good for someone who has it, and bad for someone who doesn't.
    1. +7
      15 July 2019 12: 37
      Quote: kjhg
      a dagger is good for someone who has one, and bad for one who doesn't have one

      This is not a saying, this is a quote from the movie ...
      1. +4
        15 July 2019 13: 05
        Quote: sabakina
        This is not a saying, this is a quote from the movie ...

        It does not interfere.
  3. +4
    15 July 2019 12: 14
    In a city where combat is limited by strong defensive structures, conventional armored vehicles become useless, while the use of "vacuum" explosions increases the effectiveness of street battles.

    ... the use of thermobaric ammunition leads to the destruction of all living things, even hidden under the ground.

    Nobody thinks about the civilian population hiding in the basements?
    Or the Chinese are deliberately terrifying about "destroying an entire small village."
    This is indeed the worst Russian weapon, the Chinese journalist concludes.

    He did not meet with hungry construction workers. Lucky undeterred.
    1. 0
      15 July 2019 13: 00
      propane - spilled at night and then set on fire - burns down city blocks in seconds. surviving units.
    2. +2
      15 July 2019 14: 00
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      Nobody thinks about the civilian population hiding in the basements?

      Sometimes you need to think more about the lives of your soldiers, especially about their preservation.
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      Or the Chinese are deliberately terrifying about "destroying an entire small village."

      It remains to understand what this means, in the Chinese sense
      1. 0
        15 July 2019 14: 08
        Quote: svp67
        Sometimes you need to think more about the lives of your soldiers, especially about their preservation.

        Reasonably. Sometimes. But not always.
        Quote: svp67
        It remains to understand what this means, in the Chinese sense

        And here - finally, a dark forest.
        1. -1
          15 July 2019 14: 09
          Quote: Vasyan1971
          Sometimes. But not always.

          Always.
          1. 0
            15 July 2019 14: 15
            Quote: svp67
            Always.

            A purely American approach. Scorched Earth Tactics. It has never brought anyone any good.
            In addition, you contradict yourself.
            That "sometimes"
            Quote: svp67
            Sometimes you need to think more about the lives of your soldiers, especially about their preservation.

            And then "always".
            1. -1
              15 July 2019 14: 19
              Quote: Vasyan1971
              A purely American approach.

              The life of his soldier should always be ABOVE ALL.
              Quote: Vasyan1971
              Scorched Earth Tactics. It has never brought anyone any good.

              Oh, don't. Our, it is OUR history shows that it was with it that more numerous or more skillful hordes of enemies were stopped. Since the "scorched earth tactics" is the creation of conditions in front of the enemy when he cannot get on the captured land not a piece of bread, not a roof over his head
              1. +2
                15 July 2019 14: 27
                Quote: svp67
                The life of his soldier should always be ABOVE ALL.

                So you have to give up. Right away.
                Quote: svp67
                Our, exactly OUR history shows that it was with it that the more numerous or skillful hordes of enemies stopped

                Burning your own so that the enemy does not get it is one thing. Burning someone else's indiscriminately in order to preserve their own skin is another. Burning one's own, liberating, "taking" (consciously) one's own, is beyond the bounds.
                Do not take away the topic. It was about the use of CBT in the residential sector with a risk to civilians.
                1. 0
                  15 July 2019 14: 33
                  Quote: Vasyan1971
                  So you have to give up. Right away.

                  If this is your way, then PLEASE. Just do not forget that your comrades will shoot you in the back, for whom the words of the oath mean much more.
                  Quote: Vasyan1971
                  Do not take away the topic. It was about the use of CBT in the residential sector with a risk to civilians.

                  I do not take away. I don’t care what a Chinese journalist came up with to show power or scare his readers. For me, this system is an instrument for saving the lives of our soldiers. And stop breeding DEMAGOGY. The war is generally anti-human, although it accompanies humanity, its entire history
                  1. 0
                    15 July 2019 14: 40
                    Quote: svp67
                    And stop breeding DEMAGOGY.

                    So stop it. And then "always", sometimes ".
                    And now the situation: in the village 5 bandyukov. The entire population of the village is held hostage. Citizenship is not important. Order: to clean the village. With the goal of saving the lives of your personnel, are you craving in the village of TOS? Or is it still not?
                    All the best.
                    1. 0
                      15 July 2019 14: 59
                      Quote: Vasyan1971
                      All the best.

                      So do you need an answer or not?
                      Quote: Vasyan1971
                      And now the situation: in the village 5 bandyukov. The entire population of the village is held hostage. Citizenship is not important. Order: to clean the village. With the goal of saving the lives of your personnel, are you craving in the village of TOS? Or is it still not?

                      Dear Did you CAREFULLY read all my comments? What parts are mainly given to "Solntsepeki"? Apparently not, otherwise they simply would not have written this nonsense.
                      1. 0
                        15 July 2019 15: 10
                        Quote: svp67
                        Dear, you CAREFULLY read all my comments?

                        Dear, you carefully re-read my comment, to which you reacted:
                        Quote: svp67
                        Quote: Vasyan1971
                        Nobody thinks about the civilian population hiding in the basements?

                        Sometimes you need to think more about the lives of your soldiers, especially about their preservation.

                        For where I led you further, I am not responsible.

                        Quote: svp67
                        Dear, you CAREFULLY read all my comments?

                        Of course, you are an authoritative person, but it’s not enough for me to read ALL your comments, albeit within the framework of the article under discussion. hi
                        Quote: svp67
                        So do you need an answer or not?

                        Not anymore. I figured it all out for myself. Thank you for attention. And I would venture to repeat: "All the best."
                      2. +1
                        15 July 2019 15: 17
                        Quote: Vasyan1971
                        but it’s not enough for me to read ALL your comments, albeit within the framework of the article under discussion.

                        "TOSs" are given to the tank PARTS. Sorry, but a tank regiment or a brigade for FIVE terrorists in the village will not be distracted, there are chemical platoon "Bumblebees" there, enough for the eyes .... But for breaking through a multi-echeloned defense, yes. sorry, there certainly will not be anyone looking at how many civilians the enemy could not evacuate from a settlement turned into a fortified area
                      3. 0
                        15 July 2019 15: 58
                        Wow, annoying! Okay.
                        Quote: svp67
                        Sorry, but a tank regiment or brigade for FIVE terrorists in the village will not be distracted

                        Well, not five. Fifty five. You’ll find examples, say, from the Second World War or the first Chechen one.
                        You are too categorical. Are military operations always conducted in accordance with the charter and statutory attached forces? Some tanks are trying to take the city. And some do not think about the life of their soldiers. Why are the pathos declarations, especially since quite often it is done quite the opposite? Anything can happen, especially in a war. Necessity will also force you to chop nuts with a microscope.
                        I understand that each tool is for its own task. But, "as it should be" does not always happen. This is the point.
                        Quote: svp67
                        And forgive me, for sure there will not be anyone who will especially watch how many civilians the enemy could not evacuate from the settlement turned into a fortified area

                        The Chinese painter did not say a word about the fortified area. Only about the "small village" and the doomed hiding in the basements. I remember that
                        Quote: svp67
                        I don’t care what a Chinese journalist came up with to show power or scare his readers.

                        but we are talking about an article. Everything else is on the verge of flooding. hi
                      4. 0
                        15 July 2019 16: 07
                        Quote: Vasyan1971
                        The Chinese borosopisse pro

                        Paraphrasing Bulgakov and his professor Preobrazhensky;
                        "Don't read Chinese newspapers ..."
                      5. +1
                        15 July 2019 16: 09
                        Duc, they print the same. Yes, even in translation. Yes, and in. Well, how to stay here!
  4. +8
    15 July 2019 12: 20
    a typical Chinese approach: to destroy a village, a city, if at least one bearded man sits there. this technique is not for street battles, this technique is to destroy the accumulation of enemy troops, to break through defense zones. for street battles, assault units, mainly Mother Infantry.
    1. +1
      15 July 2019 13: 41
      Which (infantry) has pocket * sunflowers * -bumblebees and their modifications am
      1. 0
        15 July 2019 14: 26
        colleague, why would you be so angry? the infantryman, that is, the motorized infantry gun has a lot of stock in store for it. Well, let’s not show everything.
    2. +2
      15 July 2019 13: 51
      Quote: newbie
      to break through defense zones. for street battles, assault units, mainly Mother Infantry.

      In fact, our "Solntsepeks" are designed to ensure the breakthrough of tank units and in them they are given
      1. 0
        15 July 2019 14: 21
        and what is the difference between your addition / correction in your comment from mine?
  5. +2
    15 July 2019 12: 24
    Analogue of the "Rubber bomb".
  6. 0
    15 July 2019 12: 29
    Not copied yet? So soon. Called "fire-breathing dragon"
  7. 0
    15 July 2019 12: 31
    Range 12 km? request It looks like a Chinese rangefinder was measured.
  8. 0
    15 July 2019 12: 32
    And the flamethrowers were not taken prisoner ...
    1. +4
      15 July 2019 12: 40
      Quote: Nycomed
      And the flamethrowers were not taken prisoner ...

      Well, if you do not count, then yes. Stop it .... bully
      1. 0
        15 July 2019 18: 14
        Quote: sabakina
        Quote: Nycomed
        And the flamethrowers were not taken prisoner ...

        Well, if you do not count, then yes. Stop it .... bully
        -Do not take to WWII, I came across somewhere
    2. +2
      15 July 2019 14: 16
      They didn’t take American terrorists, they immediately burned them out and did the right thing.
      1. +2
        15 July 2019 16: 42
        What kind of terrorists? Who, where and how did you burn out? Understood nothing. request
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          15 July 2019 21: 15
          In Chechnya, even American mercenary terrorists in the village of Komsomolskoye were destroyed, and in Syria it shone more than once, and it was used there.
          https://videobox.tv/video/431704/
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_yTtdV18xE Это в Сирии.
          PS there were videos of the combat use of TOS in the village, but I can’t find it in any way who can throw it off?
  9. -4
    15 July 2019 12: 36
    The complex is powerful and it must be correctly applied, otherwise everyone who is near will not be greeted. An example, when the Syrians brought him to direct fire, they got into him from the ATGM as a result of which a half a quarter was erased by an explosive wave.
    1. +3
      15 July 2019 12: 49
      [b] [/ b] But a reference about this is possible? Ali are you lying? Something about the loss of CBT did not hear?
      1. 0
        15 July 2019 13: 34
        Perhaps this was not in Syria, I judge only by the name of the video. Maybe such complexes were also placed there in Iraq, but this does not change the essence.
        1. -2
          15 July 2019 13: 39
          Quote: loki565
          Perhaps this was not in Syria, I judge only by the name of the video. Maybe such complexes were also placed there in Iraq, but this does not change the essence.

          Quote: loki565
          Perhaps this was not in Syria, I judge only by the name of the video. Maybe such complexes were also placed there in Iraq, but this does not change the essence.

          N-yeah, you still are lying. Admit threw a fake to srach! If not, I would have written, I was mistaken!
          1. -3
            15 July 2019 13: 43
            Well, throw a link to this video with a different name, or are you yourself breaching ???)))
            1. 0
              15 July 2019 13: 46
              Quote: loki565
              Well, throw a link to this video with a different name, or are you yourself breaching ???)))

              With what fright will I prove something to you? You have fooled, you have a break!
              1. 0
                15 July 2019 13: 47
                Well, what kind of a fright do you claim that this is a fake?
                1. -2
                  15 July 2019 14: 04
                  Quote: loki565
                  Well, what kind of a fright do you claim that this is a fake?

                  And to the fact that there is no official data on the losses of TOC ITOS1A! I can also find such videos on the Internet, but lazily, I'm on vacation! Ekh Lopatov is not visible on this branch, like he is GlavArt Vo!
                  1. 0
                    15 July 2019 18: 19
                    at least flying rockets are more like flying Grads launched from an explosion
        2. -2
          15 July 2019 13: 42
          Well, put the cons!
  10. +5
    15 July 2019 12: 37
    Excellent fire system, performs its tasks perfectly. From this, many come in horror.
  11. -7
    15 July 2019 12: 40
    If only against partisans and terrorists, then yes. And so he still needs to be able to approach the position unnoticed, so as not to be destroyed ... the range is small
    1. -5
      15 July 2019 12: 47
      But won't it go against the demonstrators?
      1. +1
        15 July 2019 13: 31
        It will work if you drive away and do not spare the infrastructure. In general, if these are not their demonstrators. Have you already signed up for some action of Navalny and are afraid to go? Do not be afraid. It’s not like in democracy - they carry it to the bus in their hands, there, with songs, screaming, shame and selfies from iPhones go to the nearest or not very police station, then 15 days, unless of course you broke out cobblestones and beat them with riot police. If you yourself are Lech, as I personally doubt, then you definitely do not shine for more than 15 days. hi
      2. +2
        15 July 2019 13: 49
        Quote: Vlad 63
        But won't it go against the demonstrators?

        Precisely, on Independence Square in 2014 it was sorely missed. I would have saved so many lives.
      3. 0
        15 July 2019 13: 59
        Enough life-giving double. In general, the Rosguard is delicate to disgrace, it only in kindergartens to quench protests.
    2. 0
      15 July 2019 12: 50
      In fact, it was created for this. For massive shelling at long distances, it is possible to use thermobaric rockets, for example, "Tornado". hi
    3. +1
      15 July 2019 13: 26
      up to 6 km a bit. But RPG does not even hit 3. You can cover with a turntable or other artifact, if you know that he-he goes there sunflower. Without air intelligence, I think I can’t find out.
    4. KCA
      0
      15 July 2019 13: 42
      12km small range?
  12. +1
    15 July 2019 12: 45
    What a fright 12 (?) Km.
    Some "personalities" in Syria are straightforward - enough for 4 ... 6 km.
  13. +1
    15 July 2019 12: 48
    Until recently, we only read about "what they said" in the United States or, in extreme cases, in NATO. Today, more and more topics appear about "what they said in China."
    Where is the world heading? (C) hi
    1. +1
      15 July 2019 12: 52
      To a lot of polarity hi
      1. +1
        15 July 2019 12: 54
        Just someone learned Chinese wink
        1. 0
          15 July 2019 13: 00
          And this is a miracle, if the translation is not clumsy fellow
  14. -4
    15 July 2019 12: 50
    the weapon is very powerful but very specific, firstly, the range and accuracy are small, secondly, there’s no protection, when it gets out of an RPG or a tank, it kills an entire quarter of its own (a recent video from Syria confirms this, it's really scary to see how many people died there) , so it turns out that you need to push it as far as possible from the front line so that you yourself do not suffer, but he has a small range and accuracy
    1. 0
      15 July 2019 13: 00
      Can you link to the video?
      1. 0
        15 July 2019 13: 07
        https://topwar.ru/96420-boeviki-v-sirii-utverzhdayut-chto-iz-ptrk-kornet-unichtozhili-tos-1a-solncepek-v-rayone-aleppo.html
        1. 0
          15 July 2019 13: 43
          Thank you, but it’s also not visible that this is CBT.
          1. 0
            15 July 2019 13: 50
            Yes, but take a closer look at the explosion itself, it is very characteristic of the volume-detonating ammunition, it is not regrettable, but it is very similar to the truth
        2. 0
          15 July 2019 13: 51
          under your link: "Bulletin of Mordovia" writes:
          In fact, during the attack on the positions of the Syrian troops using the Kornet ATGM system, a BM-21 Grad multiple launch rocket system and a 130-mm cannon were destroyed ... and not "Solntsepeka"
          Well, the fact that the maydaunas bounced and shouted TOS1, which means only that they bounced.
          1. 0
            15 July 2019 13: 52
            maybe so, but the explosion itself is very similar to the volume-detonating ammunition, although at that very moment the sound for some reason breaks off and the video is a bit strange, maybe editing?
            1. 0
              15 July 2019 14: 39
              for a volume-detonating one there must be a pause, otherwise it is not volumetric, and here either the moment of impact is not visible or it is not it. however, I'm not special.
              1. +1
                15 July 2019 14: 42
                I mean the moment when the explosion, as it were, collapses back, which makes it look like a volumetric detonating one, and so it is here that the sound disappears and after the "collapse" there is nothing, not even smoke (as if the explosion was simply turned in the opposite direction), and the next frame is again a pillar of smoke, looks like a montage
                1. 0
                  15 July 2019 14: 51
                  Most likely back and scroll.
                2. 0
                  23 July 2019 01: 06
                  Well, you yourself answered. No ending means fake.
  15. +1
    15 July 2019 12: 52
    The Chinese are clearly not familiar with our builders lol - this is a "weapon of brutal force"! For in Soviet times, the construction battalion was not given weapons - why should they if they are weapons by themselves wassat !
  16. +4
    15 July 2019 13: 06
    TOS-1A is "the most terrible Russian weapon"
    Perhaps it was more correct to say - one of the terrible.
    _Ugene_
    weapons are very powerful but very specific, firstly range and precision small
    What accuracy are you writing about? This is a weapon for working on squares, and not for firing at the window.
    1. 0
      15 July 2019 13: 18
      again, from Syria there was a video where they were firing at a mountain, apparently at the maximum range, they were firing solo shots, there was such a huge spread, the nurses exploded about 1-2 km away. from each other, and given the difference in heights it was clear that they can’t get anywhere they want
  17. +1
    15 July 2019 13: 07
    According to the author of the article, this is the most terrible weapon in Russia, capable of destroying "an entire village" in 7 seconds.
    Probably Russians do not shoot at villages.
    And more.
    A village in China is not the same as a village in Russia.
    We have 2-3 families of old people, and they have 20-30 thousand people.
    So it would be necessary to give more intelligible examples.
  18. +1
    15 July 2019 13: 19
    like this newspaper doesn’t mind that Pinocchio was developed somewhere in 70 and Chechnya wasn’t there then?) And is it a modification of the sun? )))
  19. +1
    15 July 2019 13: 28
    TOS-1A undeniably powerful weapon.
    But, it’s already worth thinking about increasing the range like the MLRS Tornado-G (122-mm) to 40 mm, and it is advisable to fit into the same 220-mm.
    * The main thing is not to get crap like the Syrian Golan-1000 (500-mm) on 3 rails, with a range of 2-3 km.
    1. +1
      15 July 2019 13: 39
      Quote: Romario_Argo
      But, it’s already worth thinking about increasing the range like the MLRS Tornado-G (122-mm) to 40 mm, and it is advisable to fit into the same 220-mm.

      What's the point of creating one more "Hurricane"? We already have two of them, Soviet development and Russian.
      1. 0
        15 July 2019 13: 47
        What's the point of creating one more "Hurricane"?

        as an option, increase the caliber to 300-mm, with 12 guides
        1. +2
          15 July 2019 13: 55
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          as an option, increase the caliber to 300-mm, with 12 guides

          Do you know why specialists were trained for Tornadoes separately, in rocket schools? Because artillerymen-"barrel" do not have sufficient knowledge, skills and abilities for this. The limit is "Hurricane" 9P140. From such things ...

          I am not sure that even now chemists have sufficient training for the adequate use of "Solntsepyok"
    2. 5-9
      +1
      16 July 2019 10: 59
      Have you ever thought that such a devastating effect from TOC is precisely because of the reduced range (more warheads / less engine)? Otherwise, it’s just a MLRS with a missile with an OD-warhead ... and not an OF, a cassette, etc ..
  20. +1
    15 July 2019 13: 54
    This type of equipment appeared even before the battles in Grozny.
  21. 0
    15 July 2019 14: 13
    The reason for creating the TOS-1A flamethrower system, the newspaper writes, was the sad experience of street fighting in Grozny

    It seems to have been used earlier in Afghanistan ...
  22. 0
    15 July 2019 14: 16
    Something often, China began to admire Russian arms and Russia as a whole. No matter the trouble.
  23. 0
    15 July 2019 14: 52
    What did the foreigners expect?
    Russia had 3 total wars - 1914-1917, 1918-1920, 1941-1946 and was also threatened by the 3rd world half century
    probably weapons invented total destruction. And CBT is far from the worst
  24. +1
    15 July 2019 14: 58
    Weapons of a very specific use, for example, in caves, underground passages and other powerful shelters. Also good for stripping traces, no wounded, human remains, or unexploded ordnance.
  25. 0
    15 July 2019 21: 35
    Babies in Syria also confirm Chinese guesses
  26. 0
    16 July 2019 02: 36
    yeah, TOS-1A was created to smoke terrorists from shelters in urban environments am
    what nonsense? To destroy for one and the inhabitants of the city?
    For this there is a flamethrower "Bumblebee"
  27. 0
    16 July 2019 11: 02
    Remembering Khabarov or Yankovsky ...
    Sasoe terrible - Russian. One against a thousand!
    Well, who is it about the advantage of the population?
  28. 0
    17 July 2019 08: 39
    "The reason for the creation of the TOS-1A flamethrower system, the newspaper writes, was the sad experience of conducting street battles in Grozny, where the Russian army suffered heavy losses." This system was created in the USSR and tested in Afghanistan. The results were promising, but the collapse of the USSR and the undercover games pushed its adoption into service for 15 years. The same will happen with the Armata, etc. Russian and bureaucracy where we can go without them.