German magazine told readers about Putin’s Shield - PRS-1M

In a German magazine Star published an article on the Russian anti-missile PRS-1M. She passed the successful tests at the site in Kazakhstan. In the material of the author Gernot Kramper, the anti-missile is called “Putin’s shield, able to withstand nuclear arms USA".

From the material:

The arms race of the great powers continues nonstop. At present, Russia seems to have an advantage in the field of high-speed missiles, called hypersonic weapons.

Kramper writes that the Kremlin uses every opportunity to demonstrate the power of Russian missile systems. One of the episodes is the televised demonstration of the latest Russian antimissile tests, which took place at the Sary-Shagan test site. The author, referring to representatives of the Russian Defense Ministry, informs readers that the Russian anti-missile successfully hit the target.

It is noted that ORS-1M has as its main purpose the protection of Moscow and other major cities and industrial centers of the Russian Federation from American nuclear weapons. The article describes that the functionality of the newest Russian anti-missile missile is approximately 1,5 times as large as its predecessors in terms of target interception, and its speed reaches 14,5 km / h.

At the same time, Gernot Krumper recalls that Russia began its development in the missile weapons segment after the unilateral US withdrawal from the anti-ballistic missile defense treaty.

Comments

[Saboteur Holuy]

In nuclear war, the most important thing is to strike first, no matter what. The United States is more difficult at them population density is awful

[210ox]

Oh well? And what about density? In megacities, yes in the European part 90%, if not more.

[Sergej1972]

In the Asian part of the Russian Federation, 22% of the population lives.

[210ox]

Yes, he lives. Where? 20% in big cities.

[Sergej1972]

Did not quite understand. Do you summarize the entire population of the European part of the country with the population of large cities in the Asian part of the country? Because in the Asian part, the share of the population of large cities in the total population is higher than in the European part of the country, and it is not 20%. Then it’s more correct to talk about the main resettlement band. In the Asian part there is the Kemerovo region with a high population density., And in the European Murmansk region and the Komi Republic with a low density.

[210ox]

Yes, of course. With the megalopolises of the Asian part. There are not so many of them, along with the Urals. And (God forbid) they will be hit in the event of war. Our territory is large, only the population is compact enough.

[Sergej1972]

Krupnov promotes the idea of ​​a uniform population distribution in most of the country, but it is not feasible, and it is not economically feasible.

[dirk182]

Yes, if you still beat when the people on duty .... Herods destroyed all production in the regions

[Nick]

Quote: 210ox

Oh well? And what about density? In megacities, yes in the European part 90%, if not more.

Moscow and Mos. region - 13,5% of the country's population. A total of 39,4 million people live in the Central Federal District. This is 26,5% of the total population of Russia. In other districts, the spread is from 14 to 6%

[Aerodrome]

Quote: Diversant Holuy

In nuclear war, the most important thing is to strike first, no matter what. The United States is more difficult at them population density is awful

look at the "density" on the map, coast.

[Civil]

Well, of course, other cities do not need to be protected.

[Bull Terrier]

physically there’s not enough cover for everyone. and not all cities are goals.

[rocket757]

The boom of realists !!! This is not an absolute defense ..... just an indicator of the achievements and development of missile defense!
There are no means to repulse a global blow! For now, at least.
"Lonely", "lost", foolish missiles, we can "extinguish" both us and them .... most likely, with great expenditure of anti-missiles !!! if striking means continue to become "smarter, more cunning".

[lucul]

The boom of realists !!! This is not an absolute defense ..... just an indicator of the achievements and development of missile defense!
There are no means to repulse a global blow! For now, at least.

And absolute protection does not happen - if only a cemetery))).
But this missile is the only one that can shoot down Amer. ICBM. And this gives a huge advantage.

[rocket757]

Quote: lucul

But this rocket is the only one

Not the only one! And if it comes to the moment of intensive production of anti-ballistic missiles like TTX, shob to shoot down, for example, our missiles, we will LOSE in quantity!

Quote: lucul

And this gives a huge advantage.

A huge advantage is to have "EYES and EARS" closer to the enemy's territory !!! Starting positions of interceptor missiles, consider "on the doorstep" of the main enemy, and many other places !!! This is the ADVANTAGE !!!
Our EVERYTHING is the presence of SHOCK systems, which will D fly anyway in response and level the territory of the aggressor to the state of lunar landscapes!
Boom realistic and learn to mate part! Then it’s easier to sleep.

[lucul]

Not the only one! And if it comes to the moment of intensive production of anti-missile like TTX, Schaub shoot down, for example, our missiles, in quantity we LOSE!

Do not breed hutspu.
The enemy does not have similar missiles with similar performance characteristics. Even in the project, not to mention metal.

[rocket757]

They did not report to us, this does not mean that this is not!
The question is that there are different ways to kill the "boar"!
Specifically, it does not matter how, where, it is more efficient to intercept the ICBMs before they reach a position and switch to the mode of overcoming the enemy’s missile defense positions, i.e. divided into many goals and cut the electronic warfare! This is also an option .... i.e. will approach the starting positions of the enemy.
The reality is that no one is engaged and will not do it, on a large scale, EXPENSIVE !!! and conditional efficiency.
There is no way to prevent a massive strike ...... all the more so since a new generation of striking means is on the way, no one imagines how to deal with them, for no money!
Everything is logical, everything is clear.
Anyway, they will develop technology, means of interception .... you never know, a crazy, lonely missile will fly in, but there’s nothing to bring down with it !!! Not good!

[lucul]

Specifically, it doesn’t matter how, where, it’s more efficient to intercept the ICBMs before they reach a position and go into the mode of overcoming enemy missile defense positions

Let's look at the problem more broadly)))
What prevents PRS-1M from redirecting to missile defense so that our ICBM will start completely quietly? Or is it a difficult option for analysts? ))))
The more PRS-1M is riveted, the better.

[dirk182]

endless flight ... fantasy

[lucul]

endless flight ... fantasy

What, does the template tear? )))
This is reality.

[dirk182]

the same case when there are no arguments

[dirk182]

State MBRs are flying ... already on the way up) and no one is knocking them down) because all the anti-missiles have left with our MBRs as a cover .... But what, WE CAN! Yes, Lucul?

[Fan-fan]

The more PRS-1M is riveted, the better.

But then we’ll end up completely without pants.

[rocket757]

Anti-missile, this is a super-fast target !!! Yes, and knows how to maneuver !!!
Do you think this is an easy target? What to bring down? So what else is not, on superfood new principles. In short option with coefficient. execution of 0 integers, it does not know how many tenths ..... no one has bothered with this yet, because they don’t waste money on figs.

[lucul]

Anti-missile, this is a super-fast target !!! Yes, and knows how to maneuver !!!
Do you think this is an easy target? What to bring down?

PRS-1M. About her and the article.
5.5km / s, 210G overload))

[rocket757]

TTX are not discussed, because nefig .... the main thing is not refuted by anyone! The postulates put forward not even yesterday, relevant now, are no less ... absolute defense does not exist, the best defense is attack .... or disarmament, as you like!
Once again, we come to the conclusion that they didn’t invent the Schaub, they experienced it. In THIS TIME, this will not change anything - our main defense is the destructive means of ATTACK!
A good, fast, modern missile defense, you need to do .... how much you need, how much money allows!

[lucul]

A good, fast, modern missile defense, you need to do .... how much you need, how much money allows!

[dirk182]

By the end of 2011, the US Navy already had a total of 24 cruisers and destroyers equipped with Aegis MBIUS. The total number of SM-3 interceptor missiles in the US Navy was 111 units.
By 2025, an increase in the number of ships is planned. with anti-missile version of the Aegis system up to 32 unitsIt is also planned to integrate the Aegis-based missile defense system in the Japanese Navy.
+ ground version of MBIUS Aegis
+Ground Based Complexes THAAD and Patriot PAC-3
+ SBIRS (Engl. Space-Based Infrared System - a space-based infrared system) - the American two-component integrated space system for early detection of ballistic missile launches (SPRN) of the new generation. In addition to monitoring space launches, the system is designed to determine their flight path, identify warheads and false targets, issue target designation for interception, as well as conduct reconnaissance over the territory of military operations in the infrared range.
SBIRS NWP should replace SEWS. It will ensure the detection of missiles in less than 20 seconds after launch and will allow the identification of warheads and false targets on the middle section of the trajectory.
And of course !!! nothing will work for the Americans!

[lucul]

It will ensure the detection of missiles in less than 20 seconds after launch and will allow the identification of warheads and false targets in the middle section of the trajectory.
And of course !!! nothing will work for the Americans!

I don’t need to write brochures.
According to the brochures, both Patriot and THAAD bring down everything that flies, and in fact the efficiency is 30%.

[dirk182]

Facts please. What is wrong with THAAD? Very efficient system. Or with a patriot. With such success with the s-300, 400 can be said. Where are the facts of their successful application ??? It is the facts.

[lucul]

Facts please. What is wrong with THAAD? Very efficient system. Or with a patriot.

For facts in Yemen.
How are the Saudis intercepting the "flying pipes".

[dirk182]

All clear. Other than excuses nothing more

[lucul]

All clear. Other than excuses nothing more

Am I so easily succumbed to divorce?
To provide an endless series of facts - everything is freely available.

[dirk182]

breed lolol)))) Do you rank yourself among them?) It becomes more interesting

[albert]

Quote: dirk182

Facts please. What is wrong with THAAD? Very efficient system.

Well, yes, effective. Moreover, when Kim’s missiles flew over Japan THAAD, they simply overslept

[dirk182]

So do not underestimate the enemy, for many years going to his goal. We are laughing at pro, we are laughing at aircraft carriers, we are laughing at f-35. How to cry with burning tears then did not have to. It is necessary to look for countermeasures, and not expose junk as the latest anti-missile

[lucul]

So do not underestimate the enemy, for many years going to his goal. We are laughing at pro, we are laughing at aircraft carriers, we are laughing at f-35.

We laugh at the facts, and you all believe in leaflets.

[dirk182]

Laughs the one who laughs without consequences.

[lucul]

Laughs the one who laughs without consequences.

Do not talk in patterns - it's boring.

[dirk182]

You have a lot more fun. Missile defense at least ask about the range of use

[dirk182]

We?) Are you Legion?

[lucul]

We?) Are you Legion?

Clearly - hit the troll.
Bow out

[dirk182]

You get a good approach to waste, that’s understandable. And where are the arguments ???

[dirk182]

well then this is an indicator of your mental health

[Fan-fan]

level the territory of the aggressor to the state of lunar landscapes!

Well, it’s your dream, because we don’t have enough missiles for it.

[Fat]

Quote: Bull Terrier

physically there’s not enough cover for everyone. and not all cities are goals.

This is why you should never raise questions about the insecurity of "other cities". The fact that the capital is being defended by air defense and missile defense is more than obvious.

[Sonixnk]

And the Americans are more competent, they are defending the warhead base and not the capital, for me it’s been cheated on us, the leadership would have lived

[Fan-fan]

They covered Moscow a bit and that’s all, and let the rest of Russia die. It has always been like this with us, the bosses only took care of themselves.

[soul]

The United States is more difficult they have a population density

The population in the United States is more dispersed. With a population of 320 million, they have 10 million-plus cities, with 140 million - 16 cities

[Sergej1972]

In the USA, the administrative boundaries of cities do not coincide with the actual ones in most cases. There are fewer people living in administrative borders than in actual ones. They have many conurbations - highly urbanized territories without a clearly defined center. There are megalopolises (relatively speaking, a megalopolis squared). In the megalopolis of Boswash (Bosnivash), according to Wikipedia, for example, 45 million people live, a fourth of the US industry is concentrated. And at the same time it occupies 3% of the territory. and there are also Great Lakes (partly in Canada), Southern California (partly in Mexico), Northern California, Big New Orleans, etc.

[Fat]

Quote: alma

The population in the United States is more dispersed. With a population of 320 million, they have 10 million-plus cities, with 140 million - 16 cities

With a megaton power of a single charge, this is not important.
Regarding the dispersed population of the United States - an exaggeration. The bulk of the population lives in agglomerations - Boston-New York-Washington, San Francisco with Silicon Valley around, Chicago, Houston and Los Angeles. To inflict unacceptable damage, a blow to these targets is sufficient. It will take 10-15 heavy class ICBMs, maybe less. For the sake of justice, it is worth noting that, for becoming a completely radioactive desert in a country the size of Germany, the total stock strategic, the ammunition of the Russian Federation and the USA may not be enough ... With an air explosion of 1 Mt capacity, the zone of complete destruction (98% of the dead) has a radius of 3,6 km, strong and medium destruction - 7,5 km. At a distance of 10 km, 5% of the population dies (45% receive injuries of varying severity).

[Ural resident]

In the US, the elite do not care about their people. With little sympathy they will only protect part of the English-speaking population, but the rest, French-speaking, Irish, Latin and Negro, they will not protect. These are fascists. Therefore, they do not care about their losses, the main thing is to save the elite, and then you can live in another country.

[Shuttle]

He remarked:
1. In the container.
2. The start is not mortar.

Obviously, the underground structure is disposable. Hence should be inexpensive. So you can build more in a short time and do it more stealthily.

[D16]

Reusable mine. No one will build new ones at the Kazakh training ground. And how can one now secretly build a rocket mine?

[Shuttle]

Quote: D16

Reusable mine. No one will build new ones at the Kazakh training ground. And how can one now secretly build a rocket mine?

But the start is really not a mortar. After such a start, a reusable mine will have to be put in order for a very long time. This is not an ultra-expensive intercontinental missile, but t.s. anti-missile - it should figuratively cost like a snipe.

[stalki]

He remarked:
1. In the container.
2. The start is not mortar.

Obviously, the underground structure is disposable. Hence should be inexpensive. So you can build more in a short time and do it more stealthily.

Where it is disposable, it is a landfill, only a protective cap is missing. And in the container, for there is nothing to examine the adversaries. The time has not come.

[Shuttle]

They showed how they loaded into the mine together with the container. Probably starts directly from the container (it turned out - yes!)
It is very similar to the PRS-1 / 53T6 antimissile from the A-135 / RTC-181 "Amur" / 5ZH60 missile defense system.

Basing: Mine PU
Management system: Radio control
Warhead: Special ammunition, high-explosive fragmentation
Application: Missile
Country:Russia
Range: 100 km.
Year of development: 1995


Vidos of the 2007 year. What changed?

[dirk182]

so she is! nothing has changed) Gazelle

[Shuttle]

Quote: dirk182

so she is! nothing has changed) Gazelle

Why then does this German boil?

Kramper writes that the Kremlin is using every opportunity to demonstrate the power of Russian missile systems. One episode is called Television Testing newest Russian missile defense, held at the Sary-Shagan training ground.

[dirk182]

and what difference does the Germans have?) ours are shouting the latest, but he picks up .. Well, we have nothing new in missile defense. I will say more, there is no Moscow missile defense either. There is a S-400. It’s stupid to believe it. All these shows are for ordinary people and ratings. But the Americans really far gone. Even Putin has already begun to worry. After all, he recently spoke about anxiety due to the missile defense system. They don’t have cartoons there at all. And you shouldn’t underestimate ent itself. Would they begin to deploy it further if it was so disastrous, as some analysts write? And then they will unfold. The system will develop as a defense against the Russian Federation and China

[Shuttle]

Quote: dirk182

... But the Americans really far gone. ... They don’t have cartoons there at all. And you should not underestimate ent itself about missile defense.

Are there any real results? Just interested. Perhaps there is some data? Just don't answer like "you are interested - you google".

Quote: dirk182

Would they begin to deploy it further if it was so disastrous, as some analysts write? And then they will unfold.

Is Poverty Apparently Such an Original Analogue of Efficiency? Is this somehow expressed in numbers?
The darkest one is worried and worried not because anti-missiles are poked in all sorts of Poland, but because anti-missiles are turned into offensive missiles by the flick of a programmer.

Quote: dirk182

The system will develop as a defense against the Russian Federation and China

And the developers say that against Iran ... Who to believe?

[Redbul]

"Putin's Shield" is a good name !!!! And as it sounds, the Libers will have hiccups right now ..)))))
I feel that some kind of breakthrough will soon take place in space in Russia (it’s not for nothing that the liberals scam our space, and Rogozin smiles cunningly and is silent)

[viktor_ui]

There is simply nothing to hide for your Rogozin in light of the fatal lag in space technology. It remains only to mysteriously smile and further depicting the smile of Giaconda. Yes, and even flowery talk about future great floodlights.
Well, I’m definitely not a liberalist ... I just don’t like the Baltuns.
"Dmitry Rogozin compared space exploration in Russia with religion" - this is KAPETS.

[Bull Terrier]

Rogozin steers there a little over a year. meaning to mention him all the time in this vein?

[viktor_ui]

Oh well, one year steers ... read how much time he has communion there in the space industry ... of course, he finally can not do things, and so went out for a walk. I, as an Orthodox German in all Russia, would very much like to ask him why priests wave their censers, but doesn’t attract Kashpirovsky and the shadow of Alan Chumak to this? Baldet, so to the fullest ... + The battle of psychics with ectraxes must be attracted to complete happiness and then roskokosmos well blow in front of the whole planet We live happily without key SPECIALS and watch the promised circus on.

[Bull Terrier]

Well, the claim is that the leadership, as I understand it. and he leads extremely little. little can be done during this time. we will see.

[viktor_ui]

Bull Terrier, you are very mistaken, and yes, the total amount does not change from the rearrangement of the places of the terms (managers) ... but with us, it miraculously goes into permanent minuses. Empty caodla of mediocrities with negative exhaust as a result. Hammer in the search engine "Rogozin's Promises in Space Exploration" - it will be at least funny, but not even laughing.

[Bull Terrier]

In my area of ​​activity, I pay little attention to promises because this is part of the work. without them there is no)

[dirk182]

It is not with him that some comrade there stole and dumped abroad? Is this not an indicator! People already understand that it’s better to steal and dump

[dirk182]

You're right. The lag is fatal. In everything !!! We slid to the bottom. And the authorities seem to not see this. The thirst for profit in their eyes fell upon them. Whoever you are not talking to, everyone feels an oppressive situation in the country. And they are satisfied on the screens), discussing prospects. Ugh ... disgrace

[Paranoid50]

Quote: dirk182

We slid to the bottom.

Well, what are you so ?! Rather, get out, just do not knock hard on the bottom (Kraken cannot be woken up).

Quote: dirk182

disgrace

So, do not tell anyone, and no one will know.

[Aerodrome]

Quote: RedBul

"Putin's Shield" is a good name !!!! And as it sounds, the Libers will have hiccups right now ..)))))
I feel that some kind of breakthrough will soon take place in space in Russia (it’s not for nothing that the liberals scam our space, and Rogozin smiles cunningly and is silent)

you are "Meehan, Mikhanishche, old man, Department. and red bul", and so on: you always "smell" ... after the presidential elections:

Mikhanishche Yesterday, 12:40 New
In general, the dynamics are positive - the price increase is small, the increase in salaries is not as we would like, but it is ahead of prices.
Now our income level is only slightly inferior to Europeans, but we have much better products. I am sure that in the new term Putin will make a sharp leap in the well-being of Russians. I think that in a year and a half we will exceed the level of Europe. And further and further ...

[knyf]

Yes, it's time to get ready to receive "refugees from Germany". Like in the film Goodbye Lenin with Chulpan Khamatova.

[lucul]

Putin's Shield "is a good name !!!! And as it sounds, the Libers will have hiccups right now ..)))))
I feel that some kind of breakthrough will soon take place in space in Russia (it’s not for nothing that the liberals scam our space, and Rogozin smiles cunningly and is silent)

Do you think Rogozin is a screen?
How Serdyukov, in due time? They shouted about Serdyukov too - they ruined everything, but in fact, today, we have an advantage in missiles over amers that the USSR did not have. )))

[ROBIN-SON]

Serdyuk with his aunts rolled the Soviet army into the asphalt. Crisis manager. That furniture, that the Army ...

[Dima Kurin]

Video last year’s test, in June of this year, the launch is much more effective

[HAM]

Precisely, there is no peculiar sound ...

[dirk182]

do not be so naive. By the way, they still have to shoot a sparrow once. Expect)

[IGOR GORDEEV]

Kramper writes that the Kremlin is using every opportunity to demonstrate the power of Russian missile systems.

They write like a carbon copy. "Putin's Shield". The Kremlin will use "every opportunity" ...
Otherwise, the editor will not miss the article.

[Mountain shooter]

Swift rocket. Yes, and the exact ... You can be proud of our engineers ...

[rocket757]

Missile defense, consider the majority of anti-aircraft missiles, start as they fire! The function is to catch / intercept and hit a speed target!
At the expense of accuracy, the kinetic damage by the impact core is the highest class! But there are many more difficulties than shrapnel defeat from undermining a warhead!
They go in different ways, the main thing is to hit!

[dirk182]

Kinetic nuclear strike? what kind of know-how?

[rocket757]

The question is, is something wrong with the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE? They didn’t study on Wikipedia .... although there is a SHOCK NUCLE, they are not associated anywhere with vigorous and terma-nuclear combat.

[dirk182]

How did you determine its accuracy? she hit a conditional goal, consider that nothing. Shot in the air

[armata_armata]

It is noted that PRS-1M has as its main purpose the protection of Moscow and other large cities and industrial centers of the Russian Federation from American nuclear weapons

I didn’t understand about large cities, I thought Moscow exclusively has a missile defense belt with mines for this missile?

[Sergej1972]

Central industrial area. Moscow with the surrounding territories such as Tula. There was a discussion at VO. Opinions diverged. Some write that within a radius of 100 km. from Moscow, others within a radius of 300-350 km. In the first case, this is a territory with a population of 18-20 million, in the second case, it is a territory with a population of at least 25 million.

[knn54]

"PRS-1M is a real doomsday weapon, which can only be used in a war that destroys the world" - concluding the article, the author notes ....

[knyf]

it is necessary for them to supply a solid domestic sign. They’re writing correctly, they’ll bring everything to the states.

[voyaka uh]

"protection of Moscow and other large cities and industrial centers of the Russian Federation from American nuclear weapons" ////
----
Which others? Only Moscow and the surrounding area.
Rockets are inflicted by a huge stationary Don radar.
Other radars cannot direct these high-speed missiles at targets.

[Aerodrome]

Quote: voyaka uh

"protection of Moscow and other large cities and industrial centers of the Russian Federation from American nuclear weapons" ////
----
Which others? Only Moscow and the surrounding area.
Rockets are inflicted by a huge stationary Don radar.
Other radars cannot direct these high-speed missiles at targets.

you know better "from there" ...

[rocket757]

Quote: voyaka uh

Other radars cannot direct these high-speed missiles at targets.

Fundamental ERROR! .... and then a long clarification that in the old days it was discovered and induced in one or two global centers!
Control Technique OTHER NOW.

[voyaka uh]

Here is the Gazelle rocket.
She is really record high speed. But there is no active GOS on it. It is aimed at the target only on the ground radar.
No radar, no hits.
Its warhead is a tactical nuclear charge. An explosion at an altitude of about 100 km destroys the enemy’s warhead ICBMs.

[voyaka uh]

Missile PRO Gazelle:

[knyf]

From a cannon on sparrows

[voyaka uh]

In this case: "from a cannon at the elephants." The Gazelle's purpose is correct.

[knyf]

To shoot down ICBMs is not necessarily a tactical nuclear
charge to use. But the thing is necessary))

[Dva parovoza]

Why is there no link to the article? We are all screaming about "fried" news in the media ... I did not find such an article in the "stern", and the video was generally published on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9-xPJLHxG0 in 2017 and he has 2 comments ... This is very fresh news ...

[Dym71]

Quote: DvaParovoza

I have not found such an article in the "stern"

It's okay.
https://www.stern.de/digital/technik/start-einer-prs-1m---putins-raketenabwehrschirm-wird-noch-schneller-und-toedlicher-8743126.html

[Luc Mokart]

This is not only Putin’s shield, but also a blow to the image of the United States, and drawing them into an arms race. Knowing the magnitude of the money spent on defense in America using the F-35 as an example, we can assume that it will be hundreds of billions of dollars wasted and settled in the pockets of officials and enterprises of the defense industry. That is, this is a blow to the economy.

[knyf]

This is a driver of economic development. It will be more true. We gave their defense industry a second life. They will not remain in the loser - satellites will be forced to buy weapons.

[Sergej1972]

If I am not mistaken, Roskosmos is responsible for civil space. Correct if I'm wrong.

[slipped]

Quote: Sergej1972

If I am not mistaken, Roskosmos is responsible for civil space. Correct if I'm wrong.

MIT and Makeev are part of the structure of Roskosmos. It has nothing to do with this launch, since here is Almaz-Antey.

[Yegorchik]

"Putin's shield" is Zolotov, because Putin's main enemy is his own people.

[viktor_ui]

Yuri, well, he made fun of ... the dill pharaohs from Kuev will survive and will sail off to the moon "the sea and the dripping gara" - keep the crab!

[Operator]

Quote: dirk182

SBIRS should replace SEWS

The Russian PRS-1M differs from the Soviet Gazelle by a multiple of its long range.

What is SBIRS, what is SEWS, what is AEGIS, what is Ground-Based Midcourse Defense in tracking Russian warheads and spurious targets in the space segment of their trajectory - at the moment, a complete zero (zero) due to the transition of the BB and LC to the use of stealth coatings of homogenized carbon and ferromagnetic powder that absorbs electromagnetic radiation in the optical and radio ranges.

At the same time, there is always the possibility of using the good old EMI method of disabling missile defense radars using 1-Mtn high-altitude explosions of nuclear charges along the BB and LC flight paths, after which all the components of space, land and sea-based missile defense become blind like a mole.

"There is no reception against scrap" (C) - you understand me?

[pafegosoff]

Well then? We wish Muscovites every success during the thermonuclear war, because apart from them no one is protected ...

[Tolik_74]

Pendotki all die, and we will go to heaven

[Old26]

It is noted that PRS-1M has as its main purpose the protection of Moscow and other large cities and industrial centers of the Russian Federation from American nuclear weapons.

Quote: lucul

But this missile is the only one that can shoot down Amer. ICBM.

It can only shoot down ICBM BBs in oncoming courses and in the firing plane. In all other cases, the question is open. The speed of the anti-missile is about 4-4,5 km / s, ICBM blocks before entering the dense layers of the atmosphere - about 7 seconds. Her range is extremely small .. The maximum energy is enough for a range of 350 km, reach in height of about 30-40 km, not higher. So in addition to the Moscow industrial region, it is unlikely that it will intercept.

Quote: lucul

Not the only one! And if it comes to the moment of intensive production of anti-missile like TTX, Schaub shoot down, for example, our missiles, in quantity we LOSE!

Do not breed hutspu.
The enemy does not have similar missiles with similar performance characteristics. Even in the project, not to mention metal.

The Americans do not have missiles with such a speed gain - here you are right. The speed of the PRS-1M is about 4,5 km / s, that is, about 15M. Approximately the same speed of the American "Standard SM-3 block 2A" interceptor - 14-14,5M. Only the range of our interceptor is 2-3 hundreds of kilometers and an altitude reach of 30-40 km, the Americans have a range of up to 2500 and an reach of up to 1500 km. This is from the series "the quieter you go, the further you will be." Their speed gain is much less, but at the same time the range is much higher.
The second anti-missile is a ground-based anti-missile type GBI (GBI). Depending on the number of steps, it has a speed of 7,5 to 9,1 km / s. So there is not only in the project, but also in metal. Now the "Standart SM-3 block 2A" interceptor missiles are capable of carrying about 38 ships. The number on each is HZ, but even if there are 20 pieces (1/5 of all ammunition), there are already more than 700 of them. Plus 44 GBI-type long-range intercept missiles with a range of 5500 and an altitude reach of 2000-2500 km. So there is much more than we have. We have only about 66-68 mines for such missiles in the Moscow region. And that's all.
It starts of course spectacularly, but in addition to spectacularity, entertainment, efficiency is also important ...

Quote: lucul

What prevents PRS-1M from redirecting to missile defense so that our ICBM will start completely quietly? Or is it a difficult option for analysts? ))))

Just that the positions of their anti-ballistic missiles and their interception zones are thousands of kilometers away from the PRS-1M positions, and its range is 23-3 hundred kilometers

Quote: lucul

The more PRS-1M is riveted, the better

Yes, you can rivet at least 50 thousand of such missiles. Where are you going to put them, if there are just a little more than 60 mines, and there is only one missile defense radar ??? Will you store these missiles in the barn ???

Quote: lucul

endless flight ... fantasy

What, does the template tear? )))
This is reality.

Alas, this, Vitaly, is a flight of your imagination, not based on anything at all, except for your own Wishlist

Quote: Fan-Fan

The more PRS-1M is riveted, the better.

But then we’ll end up completely without pants.

Camradou luculu it would not hurt to read something about the history of the conclusion of the ABM Treaty in 1972. In particular, why exactly was the number of anti-ballistic missiles limited to 100 units, and did not begin to rivet them in hundreds and thousands. For the deployment of any global missile defense system is first extremely expensivebecause it is necessary to build not only the missile defense itself and their positions, but also the missile defense radars, not to mention the SPRN radars,
secondly, the deployment of such a missile defense system is a trigger for a rampant arms race. For oversaturated any missile defense system is much easier and cheaper. Enough deployment of RGM on missiles and more missiles. And it's cheaper than creating a missile defense system capable of intercepting these missiles

Quote: dirk182

By the end of 2011, the US Navy had a total of 24 cruisers and destroyers equipped with Aegis MBIUS. The total number of SM-3 interceptor missiles in the US Navy was 111 units.
By 2025, it is planned to increase the number of ships with an anti-ballistic version of the Aegis system to 32 units, and it is also planned to integrate the Aegis-based missile defense system in the Japanese fleet.

As far as I remember, at the end of fiscal year 2018, the states should have about 38 anti-missile carriers. At the end of fiscal year 2025 - EMNIP 59 such carriers

Quote: lucul

I don’t need to write brochures.
According to the brochures, both Patriot and THAAD bring down everything that flies, and in fact the efficiency is 30%.

Denis actually wrote you advertising data. Launching ICBMs are recorded by the early warning missile satellites not 20 seconds after launch, but 10 seconds later, as soon as they rise above the cloud layer. And if we consider that the same "Yars" missiles OUT for about 150 seconds, then the Americans will have at least 2 minutes to extend the trajectory. Neither the THAAD nor the Patriot is designed to intercept ICBM warheads. The likelihood of using them for this is extremely small. Too many factors must match

Quote: albert

Well, yes, effective. Moreover, when Kim’s missiles flew over Japan THAAD, they simply overslept

Are you capable of shooting down a MIG-31 fighter flying at an altitude of 20 km from a Kalashnikov assault rifle? I think no. Why should a missile defense system with a range of 150 km reach intercept a missile flying at an altitude of 300-600 km? How to do this, do not tell me?

Quote: Sonixnk

And the Americans are more competent, they are defending the warhead base and not the capital, for me it’s been cheated on us, the leadership would have lived

Pavel! You reason information of 1974. Under the ABM-72 treaty, we and the Americans were to have two missile defense deployment areas. According to the 1974 protocol, the number of missile defense areas was reduced to one on each side. In 1975, the American Grand Forks missile defense system was withdrawn from combat duty and mothballed. In fact, until the Americans withdrew from the ABM Treaty, they did not have a missile defense system. She was only with us and defended the Moscow Industrial District. They realized that that missile defense system would not have had any impact and could not withstand a massive blow. The ability of such a missile defense system is about 16 paired targets. This is maximum.
The current missile defense system in Americans is more adapted to current threats. They do not seek to defend themselves against Russian or Chinese missiles (this is pointless). All emphasis is on intercepting rogue missiles that could theoretically threaten the United States

[Old26]

Quote: alma

The United States is more difficult they have a population density

The population in the United States is more dispersed. With a population of 320 million, they have 10 million-plus cities, with 140 million - 16 cities

But even million-plus cities in the United States are vast territories. Most Americans do not live in high-rise buildings, as we do, but what is called "one-story" America. Of course, not all cities are like that, but many. As a result, a nuclear strike on a Russian and an American city will have different consequences.

Quote: Thick

With a megaton power of a single charge, this is not important.

They have been gone for a long time

Quote: Shuttle

He remarked:
1. In the container.
2. The start is not mortar.

Obviously, the underground structure is disposable. Hence should be inexpensive. So you can build more in a short time and do it more stealthily.

Dmitry!
1. The structure is not disposable. Only the container goes to "discharge"
2. Start on your own engines.

Quote: Shuttle

But the start is really not a mortar. After such a start, a reusable mine will have to be put in order for a very long time. This is not an ultra-expensive intercontinental missile, but t.s. anti-missile - it should figuratively cost like a snipe.

Dmitry! The launch is indeed not mortar, but also not purely gas-dynamic, as when launching ballistic missiles without a mortar launch. With a gas-dynamic start, it really takes time to put the mine in order. Here is the start from the container. But not with the help of PAD, as with many of our ICBMs, but with its own engines. Only the container comes into disrepair

Quote: Shuttle

It is very similar to the PRS-1 / 53T6 antimissile from the A-135 / RTC-181 "Amur" / 5ZH60 missile defense system.

And this is the modernization of 53T6. With the same mass-dimensional characteristics. Range true slightly increased in relation to 53T6 (about 3 times). But it was still known when. Speaking once, the GK of this rocket stated that its range was three times higher than the one for which it was tested and was classified

Quote: Shuttle

Are there any real results? Just interested. Perhaps there is some data? Just don't answer like "you are interested - you google".

The biggest plus of building an American missile defense system is its echelon structure. They have a long-range missile defense system based on GBI interceptor missiles, a medium-range missile defense system based on "Standards", a short-range missile defense system based on THAAD, and already "last sorry" based on the Patriot. The last two systems are not designed to intercept ICBMs, "Standard" can intercept in certain situations, and only GBI anti-missiles are designed to intercept BB ICBMs
They left the position that the only enemy was the USSR (Russia). Moreover, they are more likely to take us out of the brackets now, knowing that they will intercept a very small percentage of warheads. The whole emphasis is on countries with small missile forces, which they refer to as rogue states - North Korea, Iran ...

Quote: Sergej1972

Central industrial area. Moscow with the surrounding territories such as Tula. There was a discussion at VO. Opinions diverged. Some write that within a radius of 100 km. from Moscow, others within a radius of 300-350 km. In the first case, this is a territory with a population of 18-20 million, in the second case, it is a territory with a population of at least 25 million.

We read the text of the ABM Treaty. The missile defense system deployment zone is a circle with a radius of 150 km. It is inside this circle that the positions of anti-missile missiles are located in a total of 100 units. and missile defense radar. All other radii - it depends on the range of the interceptors. The transatmospheric 51T6 is no longer there, they were removed from the database a long time ago. Only the 53T6 atmospheric interceptors, known in the west as the Gazelle, remained. These EMNIPs are just over 60

Quote: Aerodrome

Quote: voyaka uh

"protection of Moscow and other large cities and industrial centers of the Russian Federation from American nuclear weapons" ////
----
Which others? Only Moscow and the surrounding area.
Rockets are inflicted by a huge stationary Don radar.
Other radars cannot direct these high-speed missiles at targets.

you know better "from there" ...

But he is right. That's right.

[Operator]

Quote: Old26

The speed of the PRS-1M is about 4,5 km / s, that is, about 15M. Approximately the same speed of the American "Standard SM-3 block 2A" interceptor - 14-14,5M. Only the range of our interceptor is 2-3 hundreds of kilometers and an altitude reach of 30-40 km, the Americans have a range of up to 2500 and an reach of up to 1500 km.

The speed of the PRS-1М anti-missile is 5,5 km / s
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/53t6/53t6.shtml

The stated range (currently 300 km) and interception height (currently 120 km) for the ORS-1М are set on the basis of the estimated time to intercept the combat unit. When removing this restriction, the detachable head part of the ORS-1М is able to achieve the same range / height as the SM-3 (since these parameters are determined solely by the power of the anti-missile system).

IRS-1M does not realize its capabilities for a conceptual reason - the domestic antimissile is designed for atmospheric interception of the BB after the natural selection of false targets in the atmosphere.

At the same time, the PRS-1M is a universal anti-missile - in addition to simple AP, it can intercept gliding AP of the Avangard type, hypersonic missile launchers of the Zircon type and supersonic missile launchers of the Burevestnik type.

And SM-3 and GBMD can only intercept BB (in space, along with a full set of decoys). At the same time, the THAAD air defense system with a homing kinetic warhead is also out of work - it is capable of intercepting only outside the atmosphere and only the combat units of the MRBM. The Patriot atmospheric air defense missile system has a target speed limit (6M) and is capable of intercepting only the Burevestnik supersonic missile launcher, but it will arrive in the second wave when the missile defense radar is blocked by clouds of ionized air from the explosions of the Zircon BB and warhead.

In fact, at the moment, the US missile defense system of land and sea bases is one big hole.