Military Review

The appearance of the American hypersonic rocket is presented.

104
In the hands of one of the American resources, writing on military topics, got part of the presentation, which captured the appearance of a new hypersonic system weapons.


The appearance of the American hypersonic rocket is presented.


Breaking Defense Edition Published image, which is part of the presentation of high-tech priority US military programs. The slide, which was shown at a conference in Honolulu, presents a schematic image of a hypersonic Weapons System (HWS) ground-based hypersonic missile.

The report, which included this presentation, was read out by the head of the United States Army Rapid Development and Critical Technologies (RCCTO) Lieutenant-General Neil Thurgud. This newly created structure deals with high-priority programs, in particular, hypersonic, space and laser weapons.

According to the Breaking Defense portal, Thurgud touched on information about the new missile weapons only in passing. The main conclusions can be drawn from the presented frame and previously published information.

How does the new hypersonic weapon

The main element of the missile system will be the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) hypersonic warhead. Up to the desired speed, its acceleration will be carried out by a solid fuel booster.

The start will be from the 10-meter launch canister. As standard, the Oshkosh M983A4 can accept two such starting blocks. The standard AFATDS system version 7.0 will be used as the fire control system.



Preliminary, system tests should start in 2021 year. According to the available information, the complex will be put in advance in the rocket-artillery unit, in which they will be tested so that the military who will serve it will become familiar with the system on the spot.

During his speech, Neil Thurgud stressed that HWS is a strategic weapon, not long-range artillery. According to him, the US Armed Forces are currently developing several complexes of hypersonic weapons.

In 2021, Americans are going to test mobile laser

Also General Thurgud spoke about other developments of advanced weapons, in particular, about weapon systems with directed energy.

First of all, we are talking about systems of microwave and laser weapons that can cheaply destroy mortar and artillery shells, rocket volley fire systems and small UAVs.

The problem is that both lasers and microwaves have limitations. For example, their effectiveness in massed shelling or royal attacks is low.

Lasers can destroy an object quickly. However, if there are many such objects, it will become a problem. However, to destroy walking one threat would be better than to show a zero result.

- emphasized Turgard in his speech.

The new 100 kW mobile power laser mounted on the Stryker 8 × 8 BTR, the army is going to test in the same 2021 year as the rocket. In addition to the Stryker, the military will conduct additional testing of the system on the powerful HEMTT truck.
Photos used:
Breaking defense
104 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. gridasov
    gridasov 30 May 2019 17: 49
    0
    Yes, they’re weak with physics. Let them play
    1. SETSET
      SETSET 30 May 2019 17: 58
      +8
      Yes, these are not even "cartoons" yet, but only fairy tales ...
      1. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 30 May 2019 18: 17
        +6
        Quote: SETSET
        Yes, these are not even "cartoons" yet, but only fairy tales ...

        Tales of fairy tales, and new coils of the arms race began to wind up ...
        1. For example
          For example 30 May 2019 18: 25
          -2
          However, if there are many such objects, this will become a problem. However, to destroy one threat would be better than to show a zero result.

          Of the ten bullets thrown into the head, using a super-duper laser to destroy one bullet is certainly better than not one ...

          That's just the owner of the head anyway krants. laughing
          1. Alex_You
            Alex_You 30 May 2019 20: 33
            +1
            And on the B-52:
            1. krot
              krot 31 May 2019 07: 39
              0
              We drew a beautiful "appearance" of the rocket, but what is inside it has not yet been invented))
      2. Alex_You
        Alex_You 30 May 2019 20: 31
        +2
        Quote: SETSET
        Yes, these are not even "cartoons" yet, but only fairy tales ...


        Exactly laughing
        1. bayard
          bayard 30 May 2019 23: 18
          +2
          Improvisations on the theme of the "Chill" program?
          Received by the Americans in the early 90s?
          How about thermal protection and handling?
          Or moles from Roskosmos corrected the gap?
        2. Alex Fox
          Alex Fox 1 June 2019 16: 09
          +1
          In the picture the rocket
          X-51A - American hypersonic missile, the beginning of the tests of which was already .... in 2010. According to the project, it needs to be made so that it flies at a speed of 6-7 sound speeds.
          Characteristics approximately as in
          USSR ... 1958 ... the beginning of development and 1968 the adoption of missiles
          X-22 flying at a speed of 3,5-4,6 sound speeds. Not according to the project, but it’s real flying.
    2. Sergey Sergeev_4
      Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 19: 31
      +4
      With physics, they were always very good, starting with the atomic bomb. And the shape of the rocket really corresponds to hypersound.
      1. gridasov
        gridasov 30 May 2019 19: 46
        +3
        You are mistaken, dear! The shape of the body is like an outflow surface, which means that polarization of the body is formed. Then with absolute accuracy it is possible, even looking at the form, we can say where at hyper speed or according to the algorithms there will be a threshold potential, after which destruction will occur. Moreover, there are many areas with a pressure drop, and therefore risk zones. Moreover, at hyperspeed, a potential difference is formed at the ends of the casing, which means that the moment of rotation of the magnetic fluxes is formed, which means it is simply not controllable. It’s like a shot in the sky for several million
        1. Sergey Sergeev_4
          Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 20: 02
          +4
          Of course, it’s written smoothly by you, at the first moment it causes almost respect. Well, what can you say without a hitch: this form will go, but this one will grunt when flying? !! If so - the Nobel Prize !!!!
          1. gridasov
            gridasov 30 May 2019 20: 19
            +2
            The talk is not about premiums. You just need to understand that from the moment the rocket or other object is on the ground until the moment the cond. It begins to collapse in flight, a complex transformation of the capacious aggregate physical process will take place. So that it will fall apart and first of all in what places it is possible. and offhand to simulate, but in general it is necessary to use. It is the analysis model for the function of a constant value of the number. That is, then we can analyze processes that have different dynamics of development to those boundary effects when the destruction goes. You need to understand that the analysis of friction is ridiculous. It is necessary to model magnetic processes and fracture processes, namely, the process of changing magnetic flux vectors when the dimension of interactions is transformed, i.e., the process of fractal incompatibilities occurs.
            1. Sergey Sergeev_4
              Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 20: 30
              +3
              I can’t say anything, neither against nor for, I think all this is true. But it’s not entirely clear to me why all these scientific maxims, what do you want to show by this? And does this problem only affect American missiles?
              1. gridasov
                gridasov 30 May 2019 21: 26
                +1
                Of course this applies to everyone. As for scientific maxims, take it simply. Information simply is.
                1. Sergey Sergeev_4
                  Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 21: 45
                  +2
                  I can copy and paste so much scientific information for you. It's called: "There is an elder in the garden, there is an uncle in Kiev."
                  1. gridasov
                    gridasov 30 May 2019 22: 04
                    0
                    You are like children. There is a topic and there is a discussion within the framework of this topic. I am not distracted from the red line
                    1. Sergey Sergeev_4
                      Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 22: 06
                      +2
                      Usually there at 22-00 hang up? You do not spare yourself and you need to relax as much as possible.
                      1. gridasov
                        gridasov 30 May 2019 22: 45
                        0
                        Well, so I went!
        2. Alex_You
          Alex_You 30 May 2019 20: 44
          -1
          You only do not say specialists from Boeing:
          Only t-s-s-s.
          1. Gray brother
            Gray brother 30 May 2019 20: 58
            +4
            Quote: Alex_You
            Only t-s-s-s.

            This is not it. Keep observing.
    3. astepanov
      astepanov 31 May 2019 15: 27
      +1
      Quote: gridasov
      Yes, with physics they’re weak
      Is it the Gridasov case! Here everything is in order:
      Quote: gridasov
      at hyperspeed, a potential difference is formed at the ends of the housing, and hence the moment of rotation of the magnetic flux is formed
      Learn, gentlemen, to wrap it smartly! "If the divergence rotor hits the cuticle of the peristaltic process, then the northern Gruppenfuehrer's hyperconjugation is inevitable!"
  2. Sergey39
    Sergey39 30 May 2019 17: 54
    +11
    The appearance of the hypersonic rockets of the future in the network is a million. But the appearance of the existing GB missiles is classified. Well, except for the Dagger
    1. Sergey Sergeev_4
      Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 19: 32
      +1
      Dagger "hypersound"? Rather, an ordinary aeroballistic rocket, did you assemble the complex from what was available, naturally, slightly modifying it?
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 30 May 2019 19: 51
        +1
        And an aeroballistic missile has the same hypersonic speed.
        1. Sergey Sergeev_4
          Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 19: 57
          +6
          The fact of the matter is that this is far from one necessary attribute. Almost all medium and long-range ballistic missiles are hypersonic in speed. And what does someone attribute them to hypersonic? And there are no more signs there.
        2. poquello
          poquello 30 May 2019 21: 28
          0
          Quote: Vadim237
          And an aeroballistic missile has the same hypersonic speed.

          ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) You were also told that the form corresponds to hypersound only in American ones.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. GKS 2111
    GKS 2111 30 May 2019 17: 55
    0
    "The problem is that both lasers and microwaves have limitations. For example, their effectiveness in massive shelling or swarm attacks is low."
    Yes, yes again.
    1. gridasov
      gridasov 30 May 2019 18: 06
      +2
      Of course! There must be technology for the transition from one border state to another.
      1. Sergey Sergeev_4
        Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 21: 02
        0
        And necessarily the opposite.
        1. gridasov
          gridasov 30 May 2019 21: 51
          +1
          Of course! Therefore, I’m talking about common truths - about dynamics, vectors, potentiality.
          1. Sergey Sergeev_4
            Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 21: 56
            -3
            And I'm talking about singularity, parallel measurement and potency.
            1. gridasov
              gridasov 30 May 2019 22: 00
              +3
              Let me note that it is impossible to draw two absolutely parallel lines within a spherical planet. Think about why. Therefore, processes cannot be parallel. Because, within the framework of fundamental concepts, the processes will differ.
              1. poquello
                poquello 30 May 2019 23: 47
                -2
                Quote: gridasov
                within a spherical planet, it is impossible to draw two absolutely parallel lines.

                bent beautifully, but what are the difficulties?, say + -` along the equator and further along symmetry, of course with
                ideal sphere
                1. gridasov
                  gridasov 31 May 2019 07: 44
                  -1
                  Understand me correctly that the world is created in such a way that there is nothing in it that has the full identity of all the signs. What does this mean? This means that in the properties of the number there are such possibilities that they can describe all events without repeating a single time. That is, based on the signs of dimension, development vector and potentiality, we can build an inextricable numerical space with an incredible capacity of distinctive features. That is, the code will not be repeated. This is exactly what I often repeat about, that the function of a constant value of a number is a step in the new development of our civilization. This is an opportunity to describe the quantitative, physical, geometric features of processes by number and only by number.
              2. Yuyuka
                Yuyuka 31 May 2019 09: 49
                0
                Quote: gridasov
                Let me note that it is impossible to draw two absolutely parallel lines within a spherical planet. Think about why. Therefore, processes cannot be parallel. Because, within the framework of fundamental concepts, the processes will differ.


                pancake! but I thought the railway is the safest means of transportation! belay So somewhere rails exactly intersect ?? what
                1. gridasov
                  gridasov 31 May 2019 10: 33
                  0
                  Well, if you are going to process big data and vectorial processes by rail laying methods, then there is no word. By the way, think about why wheels creak on turns
                  1. Yuyuka
                    Yuyuka 31 May 2019 18: 21
                    0
                    Quote: gridasov
                    Well, if you are going to process big data and vectorial processes by rail laying methods, then there is no word. By the way, think about why wheels creak on turns


                    and we have a lot now in the country (especially in the economy) according to the method of "laying rails" wassat the life of the people and the authorities like those rails is always nearby and will never intersect ...

                    why the wheels creak on turns - it's not the wheels creaking, it's the Coriolis singing smile
                    but why they knock, we were scientifically explained to us as a child - a square knocks it, from the area of ​​a circle
    2. poquello
      poquello 30 May 2019 21: 31
      0
      Quote: GKS 2111
      "The problem is that both lasers and microwaves have limitations. For example, their effectiveness in massive shelling or swarm attacks is low."
      Yes, yes again.

      they have the wrong bees, although they say they don’t have them at all
  5. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 30 May 2019 17: 58
    +3
    Recently, after watching "cartoons" about "Vanguard", mattresses howled that this is not a hypersonic weapon. Now they are announcing a project that will allegedly crawl out for testing in 2021, but in fact copies Avangard. But now it is already the Hypersonic Weapons System. laughing
    1. Voyager
      Voyager 30 May 2019 18: 09
      +1
      Yes you wait, the Americans will even say that they were the first to invent it, and the couch fighters will comment on YouTube videos that these Russians will copy their great developments again
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 30 May 2019 20: 03
        +2
        I must admit yes - they were the first to come up with it, back in the distant 60s - "Dyna-Soar, X 15, and the concept of the Vanguard in the United States began to develop in 2003, the Falcon HTV-2, which made its first flight on the Minotaur 4 rocket in 2010.
        assumed values ​​of the speed of hypersonic “slip” in low orbit / in the upper atmosphere: 17 ... 22 Mach (5,8 ... 7,5 km / s)
        diameter in the tail: no more than the diameter of the fairing of the Minotaur-IV launch vehicle = 2,34 m
        mass: not more than the delivered mass of the LV Minotaur-IV = 1725 kg
        expected aerodynamic heating of the surface: 1930 ° C
        In the case of using a similar design as a monoblock head part of the ICBM LGM-30G Minuteman-III:

        maximum speed: 7,8 km / s
        tail diameter: not more than 1,6 m
        length: no more than 1,75 m (according to the dimensions of the warhead W87)
        weight: no more than 1150 kg
    2. Gray brother
      Gray brother 30 May 2019 18: 20
      0
      Quote: Stroibat stock
      but in fact copies "Vanguard". But now it is already the Hypersonic Weapons System.

      As I understand it, the Avangard is tailored for intercontinental missiles, and the American pictures are sharpened for medium-range missiles of the Pershing type.
    3. Stoikii
      Stoikii 30 May 2019 19: 01
      -1
      Quote: Stroibat stock
      Recently, after watching "cartoons" about "Vanguard", mattresses howled that this is not a hypersonic weapon.

      The vanguards are already being placed on alert .. And they whine, mostly "our liberians" inside the country .. Everything is gone .. And the State Department is scratching its turnips and can not oppose it .. Well, if only once again to arrange confusion and bring liberians with white ribbons to Swamp .. negative
      1. vasilii
        vasilii 30 May 2019 19: 06
        -5
        Quote: Stoikii
        But the State Department scratches turnips and can not oppose anything to this.

        Yes, in general, like Russia, nothing can be opposed to a volley of ICBMs, and in both cases the previous generation missiles are enough for this. It even surprises me a little why they forget about it all the time, or pretend that they forget.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 30 May 2019 20: 05
          -1
          The national missile defense system will cost the budget at least 8 trillion rubles and 10 years of work.
        2. Sergey Sergeev_4
          Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 21: 20
          0
          Absolutely right. I don't quite understand the puppy joy at the mention of "hypersound". Nothing really changes at the moment from anyone's side, more show-off, divorce and playing on your own and someone else's audience.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Jeremiah
    Jeremiah 30 May 2019 18: 01
    -1
    About times, about morals ...) Previously, they kept silent about the latest developments and tried to hide even a hint. Now, as the peddlers praise the goods - presidents, generals, designers. And the goal begs you not to scare the enemy because he should not have time to be frightened, but die at the time of the unexpected use of new weapons, and frighten his people to keep quiet. The middle class is being destroyed, crime, immigrants, taxes are going off scale ... Bullshit, see what the Russians .... will attack and others will rob you if you survive.))) On the other hand, everything seems to be. The time has come to frighten the people with something so that they don’t think about what should not be .... And then all of a sudden they will think about it and yellow vests will appear to be kindergarteners ...
    1. Observer2014
      Observer2014 30 May 2019 18: 05
      -4
      Quote: Jeremiah
      About times, about morals ...) Previously, they kept silent about the latest developments and tried to hide even a hint. Now, as the peddlers praise the goods - presidents, generals, designers. And the goal begs you not to scare the enemy because he should not have time to be frightened, but die at the time of the unexpected use of new weapons, and frighten his people to keep quiet. The middle class is being destroyed, crime, immigrants, taxes are going off scale ... Bullshit, see what the Russians .... will attack and others will rob you if you survive.))) On the other hand, everything seems to be. The time has come to frighten the people with something so that they don’t think about what should not be .... And then all of a sudden they will think about it and yellow vests will appear to be kindergarteners ...

      laughing yes : Well, don’t believe reading this in a worldwide conspiracy. Systems !!!! States are the same. Well, except for China And we need to justify our independent existence. And then something like protection of the pipe. And BATTLE for selling their resources to the West laughing : Very much does not fit with-
      1. Stoikii
        Stoikii 30 May 2019 18: 55
        0
        Quote: Jeremiah
        About times, about morals ...) Previously, they kept silent about the latest developments and tried to hide even a hint. Now, as the peddlers praise the goods - presidents, generals, designers.

        Yes, it seems they don’t particularly praise and there is no specific performance characteristics in the media (some cartoons)))))
        And Russia is already putting the latest weapons on combat duty .. And we are also developing hints at the new physical properties of the weapons of the future ..
        Remember how we rotted here for supersonic and others .. Tipo BLEF, etc. And it is there!
      2. Jeremiah
        Jeremiah 30 May 2019 21: 07
        0
        This is what they are afraid of ... red horses, and at the same time roosters)))
  8. samarin1969
    samarin1969 30 May 2019 18: 01
    +2
    It's strange. For centuries, they hid military novelties, covered equipment. Now it's just some kind of "sabbath of concepts". Either a game of "scarecrows", or futures for the sale of equipment to Arabs.
    1. cniza
      cniza 30 May 2019 20: 26
      0
      Ordinary information shootout ...
    2. maximum 8
      maximum 8 30 May 2019 21: 24
      -1
      In the era of selfies, the main thing is to be the first to capture yourself in an unsurpassed image and faster, here you don’t need to spy yourself all into a network for boasting and pride.
  9. Koval Sergey
    Koval Sergey 30 May 2019 18: 02
    -1
    What is the range of the new rocket? Or have not yet come up with?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. korvin1976
        korvin1976 30 May 2019 18: 45
        0
        Thanks for the link, otherwise recently the news on VO is like incomprehensible stuffing. Here's infa for you, "grandmother told you at the entrance," but what kind of infa, where infa, details ........ look for yourself. Not VO, but repost and copy-paste.
        On the one hand, it’s certainly good, it gives rise to development and search, on the other ........ interest in the forum as such is lost.
        And yes, the image of their source to which the article refers
        GR

        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 30 May 2019 19: 10
          -1
          Quote: korvin1976
          And yes, the image of their source to which the article refers

          I believe that this is a full hat in both cases.
          1. korvin1976
            korvin1976 30 May 2019 19: 21
            0
            I agree, judging by the picture from the "original source" this is an animated (analogue of anime) Vanguard. The question is why VO did not want to post this picture, they read the article, and published a link to the article. But the picture with the image of the "block" was placed another, so to speak directly "block with forward flow". Surprising but true
            1. Gray brother
              Gray brother 30 May 2019 20: 56
              -1
              Quote: korvin1976
              The question is why VO did not want to post this picture

              Ugly because.
      2. Koval Sergey
        Koval Sergey 30 May 2019 19: 08
        -1
        Thank you, Gray brother.
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 30 May 2019 22: 06
          -1
          Quote: Sergey Koval
          Thank you, Gray brother.

          I look at you for the "thank you" minus someone especially gifted))) Corrected.
          The wrestlers were completely overwhelmed.
      3. Vadim237
        Vadim237 30 May 2019 20: 10
        +1
        It turns out that this new HWS missile on a twin towed launcher is the new American BRDS.
  10. vasilii
    vasilii 30 May 2019 18: 07
    +2
    The first picture is not from the presentation. Just someone's drawing on the X-51 Waverider.
  11. Voyager
    Voyager 30 May 2019 18: 07
    -3
    Now fellow readers from Israel will appear and begin to idolize American developments in the field of hypersound. Judging by what is shown in the picture, suddenly and the scramjet will not be needed, right? wink
    1. vasilii
      vasilii 30 May 2019 19: 23
      0
      This is an atmospheric rocket. Hypersonic Glide Body plans on the upper boundary of the atmosphere in a short section of the trajectory.
  12. knn54
    knn54 30 May 2019 18: 09
    0
    -structure deals with ... hypersonic, space and laser weapons.
    Once a swan, cancer and pike ...
  13. Livonetc
    Livonetc 30 May 2019 18: 24
    0
    Bluff in big politics has not been canceled.
    Let's see in fact.
  14. APASUS
    APASUS 30 May 2019 18: 56
    0
    Americans spend billions on war on the Internet and write a similar piece of paper, worth a penny. Is there anything more serious than this paper?
  15. Thrifty
    Thrifty 30 May 2019 19: 08
    -2
    A rocket like an open shark mouth! Painfully large air intake, it will slow down acceleration, if not strange! Because of its "protrusion", that is, the very protruding lower part of the air intake! And a laser with a power of 100 kW, this is only for short-range self-defense, when melee missiles run out, drones will shoot down with a laser.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 30 May 2019 20: 14
      +2
      In general, the air intake is correct - to increase the incoming air volume in the scramjet.
      1. poquello
        poquello 30 May 2019 21: 37
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        In general, the air intake is correct - to increase the incoming air volume in the scramjet.

        Well then you need to broaden wider, wider)
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 31 May 2019 00: 37
          0
          Why waste materials and increase dimensions?
      2. Svetlana
        Svetlana 31 May 2019 09: 12
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        In general, the air intake is correct - to increase the incoming air volume in the scramjet.
        If you focus a 100 kW laser on the air intake of a hypersonic missile in flight at an altitude of more than 20 km with a working scramjet, then the scramjet surge will begin. He will miss the air. All the air directed into the air intake will be heated by the laser to a plasma state, initiated from the nose of the air intake and spread forward in the direction of the rocket and / or forward along the laser beam in front of its air intake. The density of the hot plasma stream entering the air inlet will be 10 times lower than the density of the cold air stream going into the air inlet before it is irradiated with a laser. This is an off-design mode of operation of the scramjet engine. The scramjet will choke, stop, the rocket will lose speed. But you won’t start it back - there is no longer a solid-fuel accelerator (used for the initial acceleration of the rocket). In addition, the lateral moment of forces arising from the one-sided heating of the rocket’s lateral surface will begin to unfold along the yaw and pitch angles, which will lead to the destruction of the rocket’s body, similar to how the shuttle Columbia fell apart at hypersonic speed.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 31 May 2019 10: 24
          0
          "If a 100 kW laser is focused on the air intake of a hypersonic missile in flight at an altitude of more than 20 km with an operating scramjet engine." - That will happen a little more than nichrome.
          1. Svetlana
            Svetlana 31 May 2019 14: 01
            0
            Quote: Vadim237
            100kw laser focus on hypersonic rocket air intake

            Cruising altitude of hypersonic missiles with scramjet 60..70km
            At an altitude of 60km, the air density is ro = 3 * 10 ^ -4 kg / m3
            Air consumption in the air intake = v * s * ro = 0.225 kg / s,
            where v = 3km / s is the flight speed, s ~ = 0.5 * 0.5 = 0.25m2 is the cross-sectional area of ​​the air intake
            Power in the flow of air entering at an altitude of 60 km = v * s * 0.5 * ro * v ^ 2 = 1,01E + 06 W
            The area of ​​the leading edge of the lower nose of the air intake = 0,05 m2 with an effective size of the nose 0.5 m * 0,01 m (see image of the appearance of a hypersonic missile)
            The effect of 100kW laser radiation on the leading edge of the nose of the air intake will lead to a change in the mode of its hypersonic flow around, especially if the laser radiation is modulated by natural frequencies of acoustic vibrations in the cavity of the air intake, resembling a baby whistle. In this mode of modulated irradiation, a power of 100 kW (which is 10% of the power of the air flow into the air intake) should be enough to lock the air intake.
  16. Lapunevsky
    Lapunevsky 30 May 2019 19: 29
    -3
    Russia in vain embroiled in an arms race. The laurels - that we are ahead of the rest of the world in terms of destruction (in pieces) will soon die down - the United States and other countries will acquire something similar over time. And they have enough money for everything. And Russia? Create a little - you need to do more in the required quantity, and then it must be maintained, protected and maintained. And the steeper the novelty, the more expensive it costs. And the Russian economy is now clearly not in growth. Dissatisfaction with the standard of living among the population of the regions is growing. Just a couple of these years - and protests will break out. And the people will not care about the avant-garde and other hardware, standing as several clinics or kindergartens each.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 30 May 2019 20: 22
      0
      "Dissatisfaction with the standard of living among the population of the regions is growing" These problems, like many others, will be transferred by the current rulers onto the shoulders of the new authorities in 2024.
      1. Sergey Sergeev_4
        Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 20: 24
        +1
        Think new?
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 31 May 2019 00: 38
          0
          Yes, it’s new - the current ones will retire.
          1. Sergey Sergeev_4
            Sergey Sergeev_4 31 May 2019 01: 24
            +1
            You are an optimist.
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 31 May 2019 10: 29
              0
              Putin will definitely retire since he will turn 2024 in the 70 — now is his last term and we must think that everyone else will leave with him. But whoever comes instead of him FIG knows - I am for Natalia Poklonskaya in the presidents or in the premieres.
              1. Sergey Sergeev_4
                Sergey Sergeev_4 31 May 2019 12: 59
                0
                God forbid....
                1. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 31 May 2019 16: 02
                  0
                  Normal woman - there is no nitpicking to her.
                  1. Sergey Sergeev_4
                    Sergey Sergeev_4 1 June 2019 10: 39
                    0
                    How about a "woman"?
    2. Arkon
      Arkon 30 May 2019 20: 35
      -2
      Quote: Lapunevsky
      The USA and other countries will get similar with time. And they have enough money for everything. And what about Russia? To create a little - you also need to do it in the required quantity, and then contain, protect and maintain it. And the steeper the novelty, the more expensive it costs.



      Well, Russia somehow had the money and the mind to create all these advanced weapons. So - let them catch up. What is wrong with the T-14 generation western tank? Nothing? And this is the simplest of Russia's breakthroughs in armaments. What about manned launches in the USA? For three years now they had to fly, according to the assurances of our Boeing and Ilon. Nothing? Well, let them catch up with us today. About fifteen more years. In armaments this is an eternity. The systemic crisis of the Western world is also superimposed on all this. So, it may turn out that they are behind forever. So here it is. smile

      As for the "weapons maintenance": the most expensive thing is the maintenance of foreign military bases. Some of the US spending 60 percent of the budget, if I'm not mistaken. Remind me, how many such bases does Russia have?

      So, we will not "go broke" - do not hope. Catch up better. Do not be distructed.
      1. Lapunevsky
        Lapunevsky 31 May 2019 00: 08
        0
        Who are you talking to now? Should I catch up? I am a country, I am the USA? laughing
    3. maximum 8
      maximum 8 30 May 2019 21: 31
      -1
      Russia was in vain drawn into an arms race.

      Do you have to give up right away? Raise the paws to the top?
      Laurels - that we are ahead of the rest in terms of means of destruction (in piece copies) will soon cease - the United States and other countries will acquire similar things over time. And they have enough money for everything. And what about Russia?

      We’ll wait and see who has enough for what.
      Dissatisfaction with living standards among the population of the regions is growing. A couple more of these years - and protests will break out.

      Do you happen to write from one of the neighboring countries? This is definitely not about Russia.
      1. Lapunevsky
        Lapunevsky 31 May 2019 00: 10
        0
        Wait and see.
  17. Kerensky
    Kerensky 30 May 2019 19: 39
    0
    Why didn't you make up your lips?
    1. cniza
      cniza 30 May 2019 20: 25
      +1
      So to test and make up ...
  18. cniza
    cniza 30 May 2019 20: 24
    -1
    The general outlines are clearly copied from our "cartoon".
  19. sagitch
    sagitch 30 May 2019 20: 42
    0
    Amazingly similar! It seems that one department works for all countries.
  20. Zakhar345
    Zakhar345 30 May 2019 20: 57
    +1
    Quote: Sergey Sergeev_4
    Of course, it’s written smoothly by you, at the first moment it causes almost respect. Well, what can you say without a hitch: this form will go, but this one will grunt when flying? !! If so - the Nobel Prize !!!!

    This is a bot!
    1. Sergey Sergeev_4
      Sergey Sergeev_4 30 May 2019 21: 53
      0
      Who! Me or him?
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 30 May 2019 22: 43
        +5
        gridasov is AI type software. Very good.
        1. Sergey Sergeev_4
          Sergey Sergeev_4 31 May 2019 01: 20
          0
          I understood almost immediately, but a couple of times he (it?) Guided me (oh?). Why is "it" here?
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 31 May 2019 08: 22
            +2
            I think they are testing in a natural environment. The theme of this AI is popular science.
            The site does not violate the rules fellow . Interesting. It was already three
            at least updates
            versions for several years (what I noticed). I also did not immediately understand.
            1. Sergey Sergeev_4
              Sergey Sergeev_4 1 June 2019 10: 46
              0
              I think after the 1st, max. 2nd comment, I now understand. Why is this necessary?
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 1 June 2019 10: 56
                0
                I say: testing. Real environment. 99,9% of the forum participants are real.
                And it’s very interesting how people talk with AI.
                There was recently an article: "They have invested in Russia .... on artificial intelligence."
                Something like that. The article itself is uninteresting, but gridasov neatly entered
                discussion and for a long time in dialogues expressed his opinion about AI.
                This is amazing, like from movies: a real AI talks about AI!
                Actually, the surname is easily deciphered:
                grid artificial software. Firms Grid
                1. Sergey Sergeev_4
                  Sergey Sergeev_4 1 June 2019 11: 07
                  0
                  Quite curious. But if you know who you are dealing with, then you can troll him. And it gets lost in places. I liked how he went to rest himself, when I sent him to bed: "So I went!". Here something "inanimate" is definitely felt. In general, he is friendly, with limited, not always appropriate, similarities of emotions. I would love to have another talk.
  21. NordOst16
    NordOst16 30 May 2019 22: 18
    +1
    At first, Putin showed cartoons, now the time of the Pentagon has come, usually they are faster in this regard.
    It remains to wait and find out who will make 100+ sets before the USA or the Russian Federation, and maybe China.
  22. EXPrompt
    EXPrompt 30 May 2019 23: 35
    -3
    Uncle SAMA Wishlist, a good thing of course, but only one question is eating ...
    Money for this beauty, from where they will take)))
    1. Sergey Sergeev_4
      Sergey Sergeev_4 31 May 2019 01: 22
      +3
      I think this is a much bigger problem for us.
      1. EXPrompt
        EXPrompt 31 May 2019 17: 59
        -1
        Well, they wanted a lot. Few things were realized.
        It is precisely this problem of hypersonic once-through missile - the Boeing has been engaged for about 35 years. There is no sense at all.
        However, in this year, 2019, the USA was distinguished by a unique event. They managed to adopt the LRASM anti-ship cruise missile, which is subsonic for a mint, when it was developed by Project A and B. Project B is a supersonic flight, the history of Project B was simply not able to technologically make a supersonic missile similar to the old Soviet 30 years ago.
        The Chinese can, America is not.
        And then hypersound with ramjet engine .. WAITING FOR
  23. A1845
    A1845 31 May 2019 12: 39
    -1
    How does the new hypersonic weapon

    The main element of the missile system will be the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) hypersonic warhead. Up to the desired speed, its acceleration will be carried out by a solid fuel booster.

    a curtain!
    applaud while standing