Kengir uprising: Bandera and "Forest Brothers" against the Gulag

105
65 years ago, 16 May 1954, one of the most powerful and tragic uprisings in the Soviet camps flared up. Him story widely known, including thanks to the famous work of Alexander Solzhenitsyn "The GULAG Archipelago". True, Solzhenitsyn was inclined to inflate and dramatize something, but to be silent about something. But, in any case, the uprising, which will be discussed below, forever entered the history of the domestic prison-camp system as one of its most dramatic pages.

As is known, in 1930-1950-s a significant part of the Soviet camps, including camps for political prisoners, was located beyond the Urals - in Siberia and in Kazakhstan. The boundless steppes of Kazakhstan and its harsh climate, unusual for people from the central belt and the south, made its territory, as the Soviet leaders considered, the most suitable for camps.



Steplag and construction projects Dzhezkazgan


The Steplag (Steppe Camp), or Special Camp No. 4 for political prisoners, was located in Central Kazakhstan, in the vicinity of the modern city of Zhezkazgan (in Soviet times, Dzhezkazgan). Today it is the Karaganda oblast of Kazakhstan, which Zhezkazgan entered after the abolition of the Zhezkazgan region in 1997.



The center of Steplag was the village of Kengir, where the camp administration was located. Steplag was a young camp created after the war on the basis of the Dzhezkazgan prison camp No. 39. The composition of Steplag to 1954 included 6 camp offices in the villages of Rudnik-Dzhezkazgan, Perevalka, Kengir, Krestovsky, Jezdy and Terekty.

By the year 1953, there were 20 869 prisoners in the Steplag, and by the 1954 year there were 21 090 prisoners. The number of prisoners grew due to the reduction of Ozerlag (Osoblaga No. 7) in the area of ​​Taishet - Bratsk. Prisoners from Ozerlag were transferred to Steplag. Approximately half of the Steplag prisoners were Western Ukrainians, including members of Ukrainian nationalist organizations and the gangster underground. There were many Latvians, Lithuanians, Estonians, Belarusians, Poles and Germans --- participants of collaborationist and nationalist organizations.

But on the whole, practically the entire national palette of the Soviet Union was represented in the camp - there were Chechens with Ingushs, Armenians, Uzbeks, Turkmen, and even Turks, Afghans and Mongols. Russians made up about 10% of the total number of prisoners, among them were persons convicted of collaborating with the Nazi occupation authorities, serving in the Russian Liberation Army and other collaborationist groups.

The prisoners of Steplag were taken out to work on the extraction of copper ore and manganese ore, to build enterprises in the city of Dzhezkazgan (a brick factory, a bakery, a processing plant, residential houses and other objects). The prisoners also worked in the coal mines in Baikonur and Ekibastuz.

The chief of Steplag from 1948 to 1954. He was Colonel Alexander Alexandrovich Chechev, before being appointed to the post of Deputy Minister of the Interior of the Lithuanian SSR, Head of the Prison Department of the Ministry (1945-1948), and before that headed the prisons and camps of the Tajik SSR, Tomsk Special Prison of the NKVD of the USSR.

Background to the uprising of prisoners


In 1953, Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin passed away. For some citizens of the country, and such was the majority, the death of the leader became a real personal tragedy. But a certain part of the inhabitants of the country and among them, of course, were political prisoners, who relied on the liberalization of the political course. The prisoners hoped for a softer detention. But the easing of the regime took place far from all prisons and camps, especially if we talk about Siberia and Kazakhstan.

In Steplag, orders remained as rigid as possible. Interestingly, innovations in the management of the Soviet prison-camp system following the death of Stalin became one of the reasons for the further deterioration in the attitude of the camp administration and guards to prisoners. Thus, the camp administration officers removed the bonuses for ranks, rumors began to spread about a possible reduction in the number of camps and camp guard staff, which would lead to unemployment among the jailers, many of whom could not but guard the prisoners. Naturally, the guards were angry, and their displeasure vymeschal on prisoners, the benefit of the latter were powerless.



The order in the camps, in which the escort who shot a prisoner or several prisoners while trying to escape, received leave and a bonus, led to an increase in the number of murders of prisoners by the guards. Sometimes the guards used any reason to start shooting at the prisoners. In the Steplage, the killings of prisoners were in the order of things, but in the end there was a case that was the “last straw” for many thousands of convicts. Moreover, the latter were very excited by rumors about future relief of the regime and demanded free access to the women's zone - for carnal pleasures.

Shot of watch Kalimulin and its consequences


15 May 1954 of the year in the village of Kengir, watch Kalimulin, who was carrying guard duty to protect the camp, fired a burst from a machine gun at a group of prisoners who tried to break from the male part of the zone into the female part of the camp. As a result of the security shots, an 13 man was killed, an 33 man was injured, and another 5 subsequently died from his injuries. The killings of prisoners by guards have met before, but not with so many victims. Therefore, the sentry of the sentry and caused a natural indignation among the cons.

It should be noted here that the camp mass in Steplag was not so harmless. A significant part of the convicts were former Bandera, "forest brothers", Vlasovites who had experience of participating in hostilities. In essence, they had nothing to lose, since many of them were sentenced to 25 years in prison, which in the harsh conditions of the camps actually meant a death sentence.

The next day, male prisoners destroyed the fences that separated the male and female parts of the camp. In response, the camp administration ordered that firing points be established between these two parts of the zones. But this measure could not help.

The rebellion itself began on May 18 of 1954. More than three thousand prisoners did not go out in the morning for compulsory work. The guards of the camp were forced to flee from residential areas, hiding in administrative buildings. Then the rebels seized food and clothing warehouses, workshops, freed 252 prisoners who were in the penal barracks and in the detention facility.

Thus, the camp was actually under the control of prisoners. The rebels demanded the arrival of a government commission and a thorough investigation of the circumstances of the execution of prisoners by watch Kalimulin and general violations and abuses of the Steplag administration.

The rebels created a parallel power in the camp


On May 19, prisoners formed a commission to lead the uprising, which included Lyubov Bershadskaya and Maria Shimanskaya from the 1 camp item, Semyon Chinchaladze and Vagarshak Batoyan from the 2 camp point and Kapiton Kuznetsov and Alexey from the 3 camp site. Makeev. Kapiton Ivanovich Kuznetsov was elected chairman of the commission.

Liberals try to present the participants of the uprising in the Kengir camp as innocent victims of Stalinist repression. Perhaps there were such. But to get an idea of ​​who led the uprising, just look at the biography of its leader Kapiton Kuznetsov. Kuznetsov, a former lieutenant colonel of the Red Army, received a sentence because he went over to the side of the Nazis during the war and not only began to serve the Nazis, but took the post of commandant of a prisoner of war camp and commanded anti-partisan operations. How many people died at the hands of policeman Kuznetsov and his subordinates? It is possible that no less than during the suppression of the camp uprising.

The insurgent prisoners immediately formed a parallel management structure, in which they did not forget to single out the security department, the detective bureau, the commandant's office and even their own prison. They managed to create their own radio, to make a dynamo that supplied the camp with electricity, as the administration cut off the centralized supply.

The propaganda department was headed by Yuri Knoopmus (pictured) - 39-year-old former collaborator who served in the German field gendarmerie during the war. At the head of the "counterintelligence" put Engels (Gleb) Sluchkinov - a former Vlasovite, a sub-ensign of the POA, and once a lieutenant of the Red Army, who came over to the side of the Nazis. The power units of the uprising were shock troops, formed from relatively young and healthy former Bandera, as well as criminals who joined the uprising.

The only group of prisoners who did not support the uprising were Jehovah's Witnesses from Moldova - about 80 people. As you know, religion prohibits them from any violence, including opposition to the authorities. But the “victims of repression”, which the liberals so vividly recall today, did not spare Jehovah’s Witnesses, did not go into the details of their religion, but drove the faithful pacifists into the last barrack next to the checkpoint so that in the event of an assault, the convoy troops would shoot them first.

As soon as the camp authorities informed the authorities about the uprising, reinforcements from 100 soldiers were sent from Karaganda to Kengir. Lieutenant-General Viktor Bochkov, deputy chief of the GULAG of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs, and Major-General Vladimir Gubin, minister of internal affairs of the Kazakh SSR, left for the negotiations with the rebels. As a result of the negotiations, prisoners promised 20 in May to end the unrest. 21 May order in Steplag was restored, but not for long.

New uprising


On May 25, prisoners again did not go to work, demanding that prisoners be given the right to live freely in their workplaces with their families, to allow free communication with the women's zone, to reduce the sentences for those sentenced to 25 years of imprisonment, to release 2 prisoners once a week to the city.

This time, Deputy Minister of the Interior of the USSR Major-General Sergei Egorov and head of the Main Camp Administration Lieutenant-General Ivan Dolgikh arrived at the talks with the rebels themselves. Representatives of the rebels met with the Moscow delegation and put forward a number of demands, including the arrival of the Central Committee secretary to the camp.

The head of the gulag, General Dolgikh, having gone to meet the prisoners, ordered to remove from office the perpetrators of the weapons administration representatives. Negotiations continued, stretching for more than a month. Since there is a large amount of information in the public domain about the course of negotiations, about the actions of the parties to the conflict, it makes no sense to go into details.

Suppression of the Kengir uprising


A month after the start of negotiations, 20 June 1954 of the year, the Minister of Construction of Metallurgical Industries of the USSR D.Ya. Raiser and the Minister of Nonferrous Metallurgy of the USSR PF Lomako sent a memo to the Council of Ministers of the USSR, in which they complained about the unrest in the Steplag, because of them the schedule of ore mining in Dzhezkazgan was disrupted. After that, the Chairman of the USSR Council of Ministers G.V. Malenkov appealed to Colonel-General Sergei Kruglov, USSR Minister of Internal Affairs, with demands to bring order to the camp.

Kengir uprising: Bandera and "Forest Brothers" against the Gulag


On June 24, troops arrived at the zone, including 5 tanks T-34 from the 1st division of the internal troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR. At 03:30 on June 26, military units were introduced into the camp’s residential area, tanks moved, fighters of the assault units with machine guns ran. The prisoners put up fierce resistance, but the forces of the parties were, of course, unequal. During the storming of the camp and the suppression of the uprising, 37 prisoners died, another 9 died from wounds.

The leaders of the uprising Ivashchenko, "Keller", Knotmus, Kuznetsov, Ryabov, Skiruk and Sluchenkov were sentenced to death, but Skiruk and Kuznetsov, the death penalty was replaced by long prison terms. In the 1960 year, five years after the verdict, Kapiton Kuznetsov was released. This is the question of the "cruelty" of the Soviet government ...
105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    18 May 2019 04: 04
    Ooo dreamer Solzhenitsyn was credited as a reliable source haha)))) many have already refuted him point by point, but he himself was an informer in the camp, therefore he held the thieves' position of the camp bread-cutter. Plus, they also talked about the "political" prisoners who, God forbid, were less than 5%, the rest of the real prisoners with real criminal cases are peasants, murderers, bandits, of whom there were many in these turbulent times of civil and other wars I did not read further, but I am sure for sure an under-author I also wrote about millions and millions, so why feel sorry for them BILLIONS of prisoners hah)))))
    1. +59
      18 May 2019 05: 35
      You are right.
      The author himself did not notice how he described the real reason for the prisoner's greyhound. Using the rumors of future rehabilitation, they decided to make a gift for themselves a trip to the convicts. The fact that these males with their * rut * were shot, as it should be for violation of the security perimeter, became an outrage. It’s just that the author somehow omitted that criminals, especially since they weren’t shot at arrests and shot for acts, ALWAYS are greyhound and love to talk about their terms * for nothing *.
      The author frankly lied about the guards; for any convict shot by the guards, they are investigating what is happening today.
      Today we are told about traitors who, instead of shooting, were identified in the zone and trying to put the blame for the punishment on ALL of US. Then the blame for the defeat of the Nazis, so educated and cultural, then for what else?
      1. +41
        18 May 2019 09: 18
        I agree. According to the Charter, the sentry used the weapon lawfully. The underworld understands normal communication after it feels the power. The arrival of Muscovites showed weakness. As a result, criminals and bewildered.
        1. +22
          18 May 2019 13: 20
          Chaovoi, used the weapon completely justified: for women they broke or does not play a role in the escape: violation of the perimeter, i.e. escape
      2. +18
        18 May 2019 14: 15
        Khrushchev, to put it mildly, is a strange person. After 5 years he released the organizers of the rebellion, punishers and nonhumans, and shot some miserable currency traders (the case of Rokotov and Farbischev)! Moreover, the verdict was issued retroactively (there has not yet been such a tough article for such a crime). In a word, the “peak” of jurisprudence is the peak of the Khrushchev idio ... ma! fool
      3. +3
        19 May 2019 12: 24
        Quote: Vasily50
        The author frankly lied

        The author lied about the gunfire as a result of which the 13 man was immediately killed and the 33 man was wounded. What did the guard shoot from? And how much cartridge did he have in the store?
        1. +1
          19 May 2019 13: 48
          It struck me too. It seems that there was a huge crowd erupting that the guard shot his entire ammunition. If we take into account that most likely in almost every person a few bullets hit and how many passed the target.
        2. +1
          20 May 2019 08: 50
          He most likely fired from the PCA. I think there are 72 rounds in a round shop.
        3. +2
          20 May 2019 11: 50
          Quote: RUSS
          The author lied about the gunfire as a result of which the 13 man was immediately killed and the 33 man was wounded. What did the guard shoot from? And how much cartridge did he have in the store?

          This is not a "sentry shot", the guard unloaded at least one full PPSh magazine (72 rounds) into the crowd (or even fired from a machine gun from the tower), putting 46 people down - and later, in order to somehow justify, the camp administration announced violation of the perimeter and a breakthrough into the women's zone, etc. It is unlikely that the prisoners did not understand what was happening and what consequences of an attempt to break through the perimeter they would have, in this case it may very well be that there was an unlawful use of weapons, which were later simply presented according to the documents "beautifully, with excuses." In my opinion, it is impossible to put 72 people with 46 PPSh rounds (because of the high rate of fire, several bullets fall into 1 body) and the guard obviously fired more than one (just the rest were "covered" by hanging everything on him), or fired from a machine gun with a belt feed ...
    2. +3
      19 May 2019 12: 19
      The author recalls the liberals several times in the article, but the liberals rarely recall this uprising, or even speak of him at all, the author gives out what he wants for the real.
      But the Norilsk and Vorkuta uprisings are remembered more often and they are more "interesting" for discussion.
  2. +18
    18 May 2019 04: 06
    The very title of the article hints at an attempt to whitewash the most frostbitten flayers, from the cruelty of which even the Germans themselves shied away.
    1. +12
      18 May 2019 04: 50
      Still, you have to read the articles, otherwise the recipient, you’re cheating, and you’ve got an excessive appeal here, I’m calling you, I’ve farted, and it’s rather smelly ...
  3. -6
    18 May 2019 04: 41
    I don’t presume to judge the situation. I can only say one thing - the guards who were not burdened with business and moral qualities served in the camps. Often, their vengefulness and anger could have spilled over into being shot when “trying to escape” (information was obtained from a Leningrad resident convicted of libel and on the basis of an anonymous statement, later rehabilitated). For those in doubt, I can offer a test of the intelligence of the orderlies of any morgue in the country beyond the Urals.
    leading to unemployment among jailersmany of which they knew nothing but to guard the prisoners.

    He reminded about a group of "support" of the current government, in which a person of productive labor (for example, a tower crane operator is offered a salary of 40 rubles), and some kind of "shame" press secretary reports are limited to a hundred ...
    It is a pathetic sight when a mass of guards, gendarmes, and watchmen appear in the country ... It is good that the population in the USSR was provided with a wider range of professions.
    The history of the Gulag is tragic and not polite ...
    An interesting moment of keeping prisoners of war from 0:40 (what's the difference ...)
    1. +2
      18 May 2019 06: 15
      PLUTtoshkin is a specialist in all matters. laughing From a condom to a space rocket (as my late grandmother said) wassat
      1. +3
        18 May 2019 17: 38
        Quote: Borisovich
        PLUTtoshkin is a specialist in all matters.

        Nikolai Nikolayevich Platoshkin is a competent and knowledgeable person with great life experience and, unlike you, he held some documents in his hands and saw events with his own eyes. And you put different letters in the names of decent people and consider it the fulfillment of your patriotic duty.
        Quote: Okolotochny
        You kind of meagerly ... ignorance issue a verdict to tens of thousands of officers

        If you asked about my post, then I hasten to notify that despite your "expert" knowledge of the GULAG ceased to exist in 1960 (by the way, do you remember this time?) And the Cobalt division was formed only 20 years later - in 1980 ... belay
        Quote: sustav75
        And the Moscow morgue orderlies are completely intellectuals!

        I have never met, but:

        Quote: thinker
        It was necessary to think of it place male and female zones nearby!

        There was a place to be ... Believe the word ... Yes
        1. 0
          19 May 2019 10: 01
          We believe, we believe, of course. Give you freedom now.
          Here is another. Well, it was necessary to think of such an amount in general to plant in camps.
          And then, after the death of Stalin, all of a sudden, and everything resolved, as it had not. Some ruins in the taiga, tundra, desert. The same people were sitting there. And knowing firsthand our natural kindness is not difficult to imagine in what conditions.
          I don’t know how much Sozhenitsyn added, how many millions. But judging by the remaining ruins, not so much ...
      2. 0
        19 May 2019 03: 08
        Do you envy a person’s education? So it was better to study or study, is this not about you?
        1. -1
          19 May 2019 10: 03
          Education alone does not solve anything. You can be brilliantly educated from all sides, while remaining a medieval savage, a Marxist-Leninist.
    2. +4
      18 May 2019 09: 22
      You somehow, out of your meager ... ignorance, pass a verdict on tens of thousands of officers and soldiers. Ask from whom the Cobalt unit was recruited during the Afghan events, their results. And then post your expert opinion.
    3. -5
      18 May 2019 10: 26
      And the Moscow morgue orderlies, all intellectuals !? The vile people of Moscow! Russian people do not like you! You are Russians, Muscovites, anyone, but not Russians ...
      1. +11
        18 May 2019 13: 55
        You can find at least one Muscovite in the orderlies of the morgues, all the thieves' places in Moscow long ago snapped up the limit like you, my dear. And do not sign for all the Russian people, among them there are much less idiots than you want to imagine. I served, traveled, I know what I'm talking about. And for "Muscovites" and inciting ethnic hatred here, you will answer according to the laws of the site, if you once again allow yourself to smear these pages with filth.
    4. +2
      18 May 2019 21: 53
      Are you the Bandera, Vlasov and other shit sorry? And the descendants of these ... felt sorry for the inhabitants of Donbass?
    5. +11
      19 May 2019 00: 53
      I want to tell you that in the camps, the most ordinary people served and are serving who do not fucking need any hemorrhoids, who do not want to take revenge on the prisoners, but to drink tea and read a newspaper, so they try to strictly adhere to the rules and instructions.
      The revenge on the guards did not fall a bit of vengeance, revenge is unnecessary labor, hemorrhoids and troubles.
      If it were not for the kicks of the authorities and the scam from the prisoners, the guards would have hammered the bolt into the service.
      Guards, as a rule, do only what they are paid for, but they are paid for what is written in the job description, and no one will look for extra work "supposedly from sadistic inclinations".
      Exceptions - Sadughs of course sometimes happen, but not for long, simply because they are hemorrhoids for fellow guards, because of them, troubles for the whole team can happen, because the team wants to get rid of them.
      1. 0
        19 May 2019 10: 07
        I want to tell you that DIFFERENT people served in the camps. Like in other places. But the camp wherever you are in the taiga, this place is special. It may turn out that there may not be enough products for kindness, for example. And then where does that go, all the nonsense.
        And after all, there are those who simply enjoy the power to fully exercise. And we have a lot of them everywhere.
  4. +18
    18 May 2019 06: 04
    Background to the uprising of prisoners

    It was necessary to think of the same place the male and female zones!
    And the fate of the author of the picture with tanks is noteworthy - a member of the OUN since 1940, arrested in 1948, was sentenced to 25 years in the camps and 5 - special settlement, released in 1958, a member of the regional Society of Repressed and Political Prisoners and the Ukrainian People's Party, lived for 91 years.
  5. +24
    18 May 2019 06: 10
    sentry Kalimulin, who was on guard duty for guarding the camp, fired a burst of machine guns at a group of prisoners trying to break out of the territory of the male part of the zone into the female part of the camp. AT
    Pay attention — trying to break through!
    Therefore, the sentinel shots caused a natural outrage among the prisoners.

    And here there is a desire to ask the author. Dear author, do you think that you can break through the thorn, and the guard on the tower should have waved his pen ???? Affftor, where are you ??????
    1. +11
      18 May 2019 08: 22
      Yeah .. only 51 people suffered, this is how many broke ... really .. that the guard essentially used almost the entire ammunition ...
    2. +12
      18 May 2019 14: 00
      Kostya, yes, the author doesn’t give a damn about the Charter of the garrison and guard duty, doesn’t give a damn about the rights and duties of the sentry, doesn’t give a damn about the rules of the internal rules of the convicts, in the same place they suffered !!!
      1. +5
        18 May 2019 15: 05
        the author from the category of couch warriors is a Javlinsky chick. in their party or stupid people or wretched: whoever asked from their office - they did not serve in the army. Who slanted, and who because of illness. And the main disease does not allow legally not to serve only the sick in full head.
      2. +8
        18 May 2019 15: 08
        Quote: Okolotochny
        liiiiiiiii

        Alex! And since when did the BANDOVER become a man? This is not a human being.
        Oh, those liber ... you are science fiction writers.
        1. 0
          18 May 2019 21: 55
          This is under ... ka!
    3. Alf
      +3
      18 May 2019 14: 18
      Quote: Borisovich
      And here there is a desire to ask the author. Dear author, do you think that you can break through the thorn, and the guard on the tower should have waved his pen ???? Affftor, where are you ??????

      This article is not from the author, but from the newspaper. Polonsky at the moment has nothing to do with it.
      1. 0
        19 May 2019 10: 12
        Well, finally, thanks for noticing.
        And then I look here already waving sabers in full growth.
        "They are not people!" You are the main thing, warriors, do not be alarmed if tomorrow someone like you will come with the same words and with friends. Only from the opposite side. You will tell them that they are wrong. but the opposite is true, you must kill them, because you are for all the good, and they are the other way around.
  6. +5
    18 May 2019 06: 10
    The leaders of the uprising, Ivashchenko, Keller, Knopmus, Kuznetsov, Ryabov, Skiruk and Sludenkov, were sentenced to death, but Skiruk and Kuznetsov were commuted to lengthy sentences. In 1960, five years after the verdict, Kapiton Kuznetsov was released.

    What are the mitigating factors? Such "kapitons kuznetsovs" were very useful to someone.
  7. +18
    18 May 2019 07: 02
    I did not hear about this "uprising", but I heard from my father about the seizure of the colony in which the Bandera people were serving their sentences in Kolyma. After interrupting the guards, seizing their weapons, they went into the taiga. There they were found from the air by air reconnaissance. I do not know whether I was telling the truth or not, but they were all put there. And he also said that all the prisoners hated this breed. They refused to obey the orders of the camp authorities, and separate camps were built for them. History has shown that it was impossible to release them from there. Rotten or exterminate completely.
    1. +13
      18 May 2019 07: 13
      For betrayal should not be any leniency and statute of limitations.
    2. 0
      18 May 2019 13: 32
      I heard about something similar, but in a slightly different version: they took advantage of the fact that there were still "green" guys in the guard and took possession of the weapon, and then who went where.
      1. +1
        19 May 2019 05: 45
        Quote: vladcub
        I heard about something similar, but in a slightly different version:

        This has been written about more than once in modern media. But I heard this story as a child in the 60s. Therefore, you know, I didn’t have details, I remembered only the main thing and why they were found? Hanged out to dry on a tree footcloths. My father worked in gold mines in the headwaters of the Indigirka River in the years 50-60, where prisoners developed gold mines. Unfortunately, I didn’t learn anything from him. And now it's too late, he has already died.
  8. +6
    18 May 2019 07: 13
    Overtone windows are an attempt to whitewash the "innocent victims".
  9. +10
    18 May 2019 07: 25
    Enemies never re-educate, they only need to be destroyed!
  10. +10
    18 May 2019 07: 50
    the author confuses such concepts as the revolt of criminals convicted of specific crimes - treason to the Motherland, with the uprisings of prisoners in German concentration camps, who were taken there for destruction without trial or investigation? Or does he consciously equate Nazi accomplices with their victims?
  11. +9
    18 May 2019 07: 56
    Quote: I. Polonsky
    In 1960, five years after the verdict, Kapiton Kuznetsov was released. This is the question of the "cruelty" of the Soviet regime ...

    This is not about the cruelty of the government, but about its betrayal of the interests of the Soviet people. Today we see the consequences of such "cruelty" both in Ukraine and in the Baltic states ...
  12. +4
    18 May 2019 08: 15
    Such an article appeared in the Ogonyok magazine in 1989.
  13. +9
    18 May 2019 08: 25
    15 May 1954 of the year in the village of Kengir, watch Kalimulin, who was carrying guard duty to protect the camp, fired a burst from a machine gun at a group of prisoners who tried to break from the male part of the zone into the female part of the camp. As a result of the security shots, a 13 man was killed, an 33 man was injured


    Telegram number 12.001 V.V. Gubina S.N. Kruglov about the mass disobedience of prisoners in the 3-m campus

    18 May 1954 city

    Ow. top secret

    Alma-Ata - Moscow

    Cipher

    On the night of May 18, in the Steppe camp [in the] 3 camp camp, there was massive disobedience of prisoners of the camp administration, around 400 people organizedly tried to penetrate [into] the women's zone, dismantled two stone walls, did not react to the warning and shots up, ] the result was the use of weapons against prisoners, 13 people were killed, 32 was wounded badly, 27 was lightly, service premises were defeated [in] the camp zone, the atrocities continued also on the 18 day of May, 3200 people did not go to work, two soldiers were injured with stones am and the head of the political department Olyushkina, I will fly to the place personally with the task force, please oblige the GULAG to send representatives to the camp.

    Interior Minister GUBIN


    Telegram No. 0 / 460 Deputy Minister of the Interior of the Kazakh SSR S.Yu. Yusupov, Deputy Minister of the Interior of the USSR S.E. Egorov on the situation in the 3-th campus

    20 May 1954 city

    Ow. top secret

    Alma-Ata - Moscow

    According to Colonel Konovalov, Head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Karaganda Oblast, the situation in the Stepnag 3 encampment by the morning of May 20 is the following: communication between men and women, disobedience and absenteeism of all prisoners to work continues. Employees of the camp to the residential area outside the watch of prisoners are still not allowed with a warning about the danger to life. In the evening, May 19 from the chamber zone, located between the male and female zones, managed to remove the 14 killed during the use of weapons 18 May. One killed remained in the residential area and the prisoners placed in the morgue. The wounded are also located in the zone where medical assistance is provided to them from the prison population. Necessary medicines are available. Food from among those in the zone is distributed among the prisoners at the rate established by them. Representatives of the prisoners participating in the negotiations behave defiantly, demanding the return of the dead bodies to the zone, punishment of those guilty of using weapons, after which only they will conduct further negotiations. The zone's security has been strengthened; 100 reinforcements from the soldiers have been given from Karaganda, no escapes. Deputy beginning Gulag Comrade Bochkov with a representative of the Union Prosecutor's Office on the evening of 19 in May arrived [to] Dzhezkazgan, where Comrade Gubin, Minister of Internal Affairs of the Kazakh SSR and Deputy. Republic Attorney, who today in 12.00 go to the zone. At other objects Steplag calmly, all prisoners are working.

    Deputy of the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Kazakh SSR, Colonel Yusupov


    ... all documents and telegrams about those events:
    https://www.alexanderyakovlev.org/fond/issues-doc/1010416
  14. -6
    18 May 2019 09: 35
    You can convict convicts convulsively, but I think the real picture is a little different.
    First of all, we will never know the real state of affairs. As they say, the winners write the story. What are the real preconditions for rebellion and its causes?
    Second, the OUNites and other nationalists did not consider themselves guilty of anything. They considered themselves patriots of their peoples / countries. Especially for example the Baltic states. For example, they considered themselves victims of the Russian occupation.
    Third, why were the Moldovans in the camp? Because you were Baptists? Especially peaceful. This is generally out of the ordinary.
    1. +7
      18 May 2019 11: 02
      Quote: Purgin
      Second, the OUNites and other nationalists did not consider themselves guilty of anything. They considered themselves patriots of their peoples / countries. Especially for example the Baltic states. For example, they considered themselves victims of the Russian occupation

      ====
      they, the OUN and the Baltic states, etc., can consider themselves victims, for there are reasons and consequences. but in doing so, and in many ways, like murderers, fascists and occupiers, and in fact being them, they do not consider themselves like that. and unlike the Russian Federation, they create different institutions of memory, write historical works, exhibitions, etc. etc., all for the realization of their point of view. then this, systematically and with success, is fed to the population and the younger generation. I do not know what the ideological environment in power is guided by, but, on the surface, nothing is done in the Russian Federation to confront, expose and attack in this direction.
      1. -10
        18 May 2019 11: 37
        Just wondering what they did as occupiers and fascists. And how do you know how they acted?
        There were people who were arrested for campaigning, for refusing to pay taxes and others, for religion.
        The Germans also considered the partisans to be terrorists. God forbid the Germans would win, now they would blame the damned terrorists.
        1. +5
          18 May 2019 11: 44
          Quote: Purgin
          Just wondering what they did as occupiers and fascists. And how do you know how they acted?

          ===
          how where, there are eyewitness accounts, documents, etc. if you are by personalities, this is to specialists, archives.

          The Germans also considered the partisans to be terrorists. God forbid the Germans would win, now they would brand stigmatized terrorists.
          ===
          and if you have a blizzard about the snowstorm, as here, go by yourself.
          1. -4
            18 May 2019 12: 00
            So why argue? All are guilty, all fascists and it was necessary to shoot.
            1. +4
              18 May 2019 12: 15
              Quote: Purgin
              So why argue? All are guilty, all fascists and it was necessary to shoot.

              ===
              blizzard and debate are two different things.

              The Germans also considered the partisans to be terrorists. God forbid the Germans would win, now they would blame the damned terrorists.
              ===
              partisans and invaders
              terrorism (Latin terror - fear - horror), violent actions (harassment, destruction, hostage taking, murder, etc.) with the aim of intimidation, suppression of political opponents, competitors, imposing a certain line of behavior.
              1. -15
                18 May 2019 13: 39
                So I can’t believe that there were some guilty there. somehow in Europe sorted out without camps and shots. If I were there, I would also rebel. And then some sort of Vitiorio would write that we need to counteract this. I mean the criminal I am.
                Excuse me. The Stalinist regime is a crime against humanity. No matter how much he is whitewashed. And those who whitewash him too are criminals.
                In your words, for example, Ukraine must deport Russians from Crimea, because they betrayed Ukraine. Imprison them in camps, and if they rebel, shoot them down.
                1. +2
                  18 May 2019 16: 19
                  Quote: Purgin
                  I can’t believe that there were some guilty.

                  ===
                  where did i write

                  Quote: Victorio
                  they, the OUN and the Baltic states, etc. may consider themselves victims, because there are reasons and consequences. but acting, and in many waysas killers, fascists and occupiers, and in fact being them
                  - you probably need to read it again to figure it out

                  topic is closed
                  1. +1
                    19 May 2019 02: 06
                    where did i write

                    how where, there are eyewitness accounts, documents, etc.

                    Of course you didn’t write this.
                2. VLR
                  +3
                  18 May 2019 19: 56
                  Quote: "somehow they sorted out in Europe without camps."
                  And who told you such nonsense? What Soros seminar? There is no time to answer in full, but look, at least my recent article "Weatherubung vs. Wilfred". At least the last 2 sections, if all the laziness. Learn a thing or two about "civilized socialists" Norwegians.
                  As for the "criminality" of the Stalinist regime, believe me, it is no more criminal than Roosevelt's or Churchilliev's. The same Roosevelt in the United States during the Great Depression arranged what we started with, gulag.
                  1. +1
                    19 May 2019 02: 02
                    I read your article. The scale is very different.
                    1. 0
                      19 May 2019 07: 44
                      Sanka, with the corresponding surname (or chase), sweeps ... no knowledge of history, no fig. Some cries about the red executioners. Even read the article in scrap. It also says that one of the organizers left the dungeons after 6 years. After serving low kaneshno. But to read and understand, not for liberoids burdened by intellect ... noooo ... to think, it hurts. How boring and disgusting you are, Purgin.
                3. 0
                  18 May 2019 22: 02
                  If they were a Bandera, who destroyed civilians, then they would sit there.
                  1. -2
                    19 May 2019 02: 00
                    But did the Bolsheviks not destroy civilians? Who are the judges?
                    1. 0
                      19 May 2019 07: 37
                      according to the list please
                    2. 0
                      29 May 2019 09: 12
                      I cut you, and you shaved.
                4. -1
                  19 May 2019 14: 40
                  \ in Europe without camps and executions? You, my dear man, have not heard anything about the allied camps after the "liberation"? birdie
      2. +2
        18 May 2019 12: 53
        Quote: Victorio
        Russia does nothing to oppose

        And who's in the way? In my neighboring village, people gathered, chose people, sent them to the administration, allocated money there, part of them collected themselves, erected a monument to fellow villagers who died in the Second World War. At the opening, the guys from the local and neighboring DCs performed, in short, with their own hands. And what's stopping you? Or, again, Putin is to blame, who, apparently, should do everything for you? Or you just do not give money, but really need? Or what?
        1. 0
          19 May 2019 07: 45
          monument to holy people!
      3. 0
        19 May 2019 09: 55
        With regards to the Baltic and Ukrainian disadvantages ...

        ... for those wishing to revise the results of World War II, Russia can be shown.

        Yes
    2. +4
      18 May 2019 13: 44
      It is not entirely clear about the Baptists, perhaps they were the most cunning. They thought that participation in the riot would be expensive, and so the excuse: "We would be glad, but religion does not give. But we will pray to God for you."
      1. 0
        19 May 2019 09: 48
        They weren’t Baptists, but witnesses (figs).

        laughing

        By the way, witnesses are still banned in Russia sect along with Scientologists and Aum Shinrikyo.
    3. 0
      19 May 2019 14: 36
      Og. the Nazis also considered themselves victims. they sincerely believed in the speech of alozych
  15. +7
    18 May 2019 09: 38
    Now in Ukraine and in the Baltic, we are reaping the benefits. All kinds of Nazi are now - Heroes. They put monuments.
  16. +16
    18 May 2019 10: 16
    The camp leadership is worthy of punishment - how did the ZK work lazily if they still had the strength for women? It is not surprising that the plan for the extraction of copper ore was frustrated. A sentry acted strictly according to the charter, he should have been encouraged.
  17. AB
    +6
    18 May 2019 10: 31
    The author condemns the administration and protection of the camp? At the same time, he regrets the ZK, the traitors and the murderers, who, even during the arrest, had to be immediately put against the wall.
    1. +2
      18 May 2019 10: 43
      Quote: AB
      The author condemns the administration and protection of the camp? At the same time, he regrets the ZK, the traitors and the murderers, who, even during the arrest, had to be immediately put against the wall.

      ===
      the law for all, as well as the condemnation of the cruelty of all. history teaches us, teaches, but little help
      1. AB
        0
        19 May 2019 11: 01
        If, during the mopping-up in the war and especially in the post-war time in Western Ukraine and the Baltic states, all these forest brothers, Bandera and their accomplices would have been put to the wall right away and not shown Socialist legitimacy, then I think the revival of fascism, in these now independent countries, would not It was.
        Quote: Victorio
        law for everyone

        Law for serial maniacs? For pedophiles? For bandits who kill and mutilate sometimes whole families? Oh well. Ask the affected people about this.
  18. +6
    18 May 2019 11: 04
    The order in the camps, according to which the escort who shot a prisoner or several prisoners while trying to escape, received leave and a bonus, led to an increase in the number of murders of prisoners by guards. Sometimes the guards used any excuse to start shooting at the prisoners.

    Ay-yay-yay .... Poor Bandera, forest bandits and other traitors. Under the evil and bloody Stalin, they were given 25 years old. From the same atrocities ....
    PS. When I would be shot right after the interrogation.
  19. +4
    18 May 2019 12: 18
    The leaders of the uprising Ivashchenko, "Keller", Knotmus, Kuznetsov, Ryabov, Skiruk and Sluchenkov were sentenced to death, but Skiruk and Kuznetsov, the death penalty was replaced by long prison terms. In the 1960 year, five years after the verdict, Kapiton Kuznetsov was released. This is the question of the "cruelty" of the Soviet government ...

    And now these creatures their henchmen and descendants revive Nazism \ anti-Sovietism \ Russophobia ...
    Everyone had a knife! Not only leaders!
  20. +12
    18 May 2019 12: 35
    Somehow gently treated when restoring order - During the storming of the camp and the suppression of the uprising, 37 prisoners died, and 9 died from wounds. if you consider that one sentry Kalimulin, one turn for a group of prisoners trying to break through from the territory of the male part of the zone to the female part of the camp. As a result of the guard’s shots, 13 people died, 33 people were injured, and 5 subsequently died from the wounds received.... At once, almost fifty transferred to disability and "sent to the moon", and then the troops were tanks, machine guns, machine guns and the same quantitative result. Maybe it would be easier for Kalimulin to give another three or four disks to the PCA. You look and the result would be more significant.
    1. +6
      18 May 2019 12: 39
      Maybe it would be easier for Kalimulin to give another three or four disks to the PCA.

      For such a thing, it’s not a pity that he will give the machine gun to Goryunov with triple ammunition.
  21. +1
    18 May 2019 13: 29
    It was necessary to immediately machine guns and tanks and to dust, the other these ghouls did not understand and did not accept
  22. VLR
    +6
    18 May 2019 14: 37
    To have an idea of ​​the cruelty of the Stalinist regime, it is enough to count how many Vlasovites, policemen, OUN-sheep, "forest brothers" and others are still alive and well - 74 years (!) After the Victory. And how many of them were there in the 60s-70s and 80s ?! How did they raise their children and grandchildren? And after that we are surprised that in Lvov or Riga, even in Soviet times, sellers sometimes demonstratively "did not understand" the Russian language? Stalin just at this time abolished the death penalty - therefore, these scum survived and left poisonous offspring.
    1. +1
      19 May 2019 20: 13
      I confirm that my mother with tourists from Kiev was in the Baltic market in Vilnius. Grandfather heard Russian speech, defiantly turned over the kitchen with strawberries, spoke Ukrainian, sold immediately. It was similar in Czechoslovakia, where a whole floor with fur coats was closed there in a department store, recognizing the approaching Soviet tourists. I spent all my childhood in a village in the Vinnitsa region, for us children, the word Bandera was equal to Babai.
  23. +2
    18 May 2019 14: 43
    I didn’t understand why they so took over the author. The man accurately described that there were a bunch of criminals who had to be shot initially. And that the administration was initially doing the right thing. The only negative was that the central government immediately gave a slack. After the first attempt to get to the women, it was necessary to conduct an investigation and revealing shots. And then do not negotiate for a month. In the article no one whitens Solzhenitsyn and the current liberals. They are all Judas.
  24. VLR
    +6
    18 May 2019 14: 52
    By the way, I'm sure few people know how many people were in the camps at the time of Stalin's death - in March 1953. Here are the exact numbers: 2 526 402 people. Political of them - 221 435 (8,76%). As you can imagine, the overwhelming majority of them at that time were SS men from the Baltic states and Western Ukraine, Bandera, Vlasov and policemen. Besides, their ranks were constantly replenished with animal-like "green brothers". Now you understand why people in
    Was the USSR shocked by Khrushchev's report? They did not even suspect that they were living in a totalitarian police state, where "funnels" drive and people are imprisoned for jokes. When I was at school, my neighbor's grandfather told my parents in front of me how, after Khrushchev's report, he went to the district committee and threw the party card in the face of one secretary with the words: "I'm leaving because Khrushchev is about ... l the party" - and he kept silent - because it was true and there was no answer. And no one took this grandfather off the line for an apartment or even deprived him of the prize.
    1. 0
      20 May 2019 12: 01
      Quote: VlR
      Here are the exact numbers: 2 526 402 people. Political of them - 221 435 (8,76%). As you can imagine, the overwhelming majority of them at that time were SS men from the Baltic states and Western Ukraine, Bandera, Vlasov and policemen. Besides, their ranks were constantly replenished with animal-like "green brothers".

      Dear Valery, you seriously believe that after the crucible of the war, 2,3 million people. who sat in the camps - were they mostly policemen and collaborators? Yes, there are simply no such figures for those who collaborated on the territory of the USSR, and among them there were also losses during hostilities, and due to illness, etc. If you are talking about 200 thousand "political" - then political articles were not applied to Bandera's or collaborators in any way, they were sued by criminal letters ("political zk" is exclusively "internal opposition"). Therefore, isn't it easier to assume that the majority of the "inmates" at the time of Stalin were still ordinary citizens and the percentage of collaborators was small among them? (although the camp referred to in the article, it is quite possible that it "specialized" precisely on the representatives of the "armed opposition").
  25. VLR
    +6
    18 May 2019 15: 02
    A member of Gorbachev's Politburo, renegade and traitor Yakovlev, during the years of Perestroika, created a commission to rehabilitate victims of political repression. They dug like mad moles. Do you know what you found out? During the entire existence of Soviet power, from 1919 to 1990, 3 786 094 people were convicted under political articles, of which 642 980 people were shot. Moreover, 90% of these arrests and executions fell on two years - 1937 and 1938. At the time, the NKVD was headed by the pederast Nikolai Yezhov, suffering from an inferiority complex. The dwarf's head was spinning from the power that fell on him. To get rid of him, he had to call in Moscow a man who least of all wanted to work in the NKVD system and dreamed of a career as an engineer and builder. And his name was Lavrenty Beria. Yakovlev was very disappointed with these figures and immediately classified them. And our foolish perestroika immediately began to compete: who is more? No sooner does some idiot write "20 million" than another will write "30" or "40". It's just amazing: how did they not reach one hundred million? Yakovlev decided to show everyone what a tyrant and sadist this Stalin was, and gave an unequivocal order: to rehabilitate everyone! But, despite all the efforts, only about 800 succeeded. Among them, by the way, were very odious people. Who could, for example, suspect Tukhachevsky, Yakir and Yegorov, who were arrested on the eve of their planned coup d'état, of excessive democratism? Do you think they were eager for power to close prisons and distribute flowers and candies to everyone? But even they did not dare to rehabilitate more than 000 - they were all justly convicted. And how were these 800 rehabilitated? On purely formal grounds. For example, many embezzlers were convicted on political charges - the investigators simply did not believe that we are people who "have everything" could just steal. So they looked - he was a bribe-taker, but did not spy on Japan? We rehabilitate - innocent!
    1. 0
      19 May 2019 07: 52
      3786094 still with criminals?
    2. 0
      19 May 2019 11: 45
      Egorov was arrested at the end of Yezhov terror, shot already under Beria. He himself was involved in the destruction of military personnel.
    3. +1
      19 May 2019 11: 50
      Yezhov, by the way, was first of all the Secretary of the Central Committee and the chairman of the Party Control Committee, and then he headed the NKVD concurrently. You think that Stalin, Molotov and other leaders do not bear any responsibility for the promotion of this subject and for its "excesses". Yezhov, after all, not only destroyed real or imaginary oppositionists, but also the most real Stalinists.
  26. 0
    18 May 2019 15: 19
    "which included from 1 camp point: Lyubov Bershadskaya and Maria Shimanskaya" why are they, and not Matryona Ivanovna or Marta Ozole 'or something else? How did they stand out: they had beauties and many gentlemen, were insatiable that they would let 20 people pass through themselves and still not satisfied, or the most just or the most cruel? How they stood out. I'm just interested.
    "which would lead to unemployment among the jailers", when I was a schoolgirl, an old man lived in our street, they say that he was the executor of sentences, NOBODY spoke to him. The participants in the war bypassed him, and the teenagers bellowed or moaned in the trail.
    Perhaps they'll give me a minus, but among the jailers then there were real ones. Uspensky also has this: "The Leader's Privy Counselor" I read this book, there were publications in magazines in the 70s
    1. 0
      18 May 2019 23: 45
      an old man lived on our street, they say that he was the executor of sentences,

      Is it possible to do without performers?
      Or is it time to come up with an automated system without human intervention?
      A sort of system in the form of cinematic "SCREAMS" (story by Philip K. Dick "The Second Model")!
      Or he could create the Guardian Bird system as described by Robert Sheckley.
    2. -1
      19 May 2019 07: 53
      even scrap you put minus is not interesting.
  27. +2
    18 May 2019 17: 36
    It’s a pity, it’s a pity that the government turned out to be toothless. So this rot grew, spread and destroyed the country. With the traitors, Bandera, policemen, forest and others, the sentence was to be the only true one, the sentence was without negotiation. Decisively and instantly.
  28. +2
    18 May 2019 17: 47
    Stalin regretted these scumbags-traitors, didn’t shoot him, but Khrushchev released them. He rehabilitated or amnestied someone. Later, they were in partisans and households. workers made their way.
  29. +1
    18 May 2019 20: 02
    Quote: VlR
    By the way, I'm sure few people know how many people were in the camps at the time of Stalin's death - in March 1953. Here are the exact numbers: 2 526 402 people.

    Valery! Don't be the most knowledgeable. The Rodina magazine wrote about this back in the early 90s. There is about this in the school history textbook for 1995 ...
    1. VLR
      0
      18 May 2019 20: 20
      I think you are an exception to the rule. You have no idea how many people, speaking about that time, are still retelling articles from "Ogonyok" by Korotich.
  30. +1
    19 May 2019 09: 22
    "As a result of the guard's shots, 13 people were killed, 33 people were wounded," the author clearly saw the current weapon on the internet, and certainly did not shoot (if the current was in the shooting range). As a shooter, I will say that such a result is not a couple of shots from a tower, but an active battle for 15-20 minutes, and with an automatic weapon. And it is no longer accepted to refer to SOVRinitsyn, everyone knows that it was a bullshit.
  31. -1
    19 May 2019 09: 42
    Here, disadvantages of disadvantages - now look what is happening in Ukraine ...
  32. +1
    19 May 2019 11: 59
    Bandera, Vlasov, "forest brothers" were sent to the camps. And their party comrades, who may have been guilty of something, but who really contributed to the Victory, were sent to be shot. I mean the "Leningrad affair", during which a massacre of Zhdanov's nominees, in the overwhelming majority of Russians by nationality, was organized. What, Kuznetsov, Voznesensky, Rodionov and others should have been sent to the next world? And Abakumov, who made the greatest contribution to the destruction of these people, was arrested during Stalin's lifetime and later destroyed.
  33. +1
    19 May 2019 12: 05
    Recently, on Russian television, they talked about the old Banderovka, which told how they destroyed their fellow villagers just for showing sympathy for the Soviet regime. They killed either with axes ("poleaxes") or strangled them with laces ... They asked a veteran of the special services who was present at this program: "What should be done with the Bandera people?" He replied: "They must be destroyed ALL OVERALL!" By the end of Stalin's reign, almost Bandera were either killed or imprisoned. With the coming to power of Khrushchev, the Banderaites were called "fighters for independence." They were amnestied and released. 100 thousand Bandera were released, the same number returned from Canada. They were settled all over Ukraine. They tried to send young doctors and teachers from Donbass to Western Ukraine. 6 thousand of them were killed .. It was the Bandera who unleashed the massacre on the Maidan! ... The Ukrainian writer Yaroslav Galan, who was later killed with a Hutsul hatchet, has a story about how the Bandera supporters killed the girl's parents. When they were about to kill the girl, the leader offered to feed her with cutlets from the meat of her parents ... The Bandera people are not treated and are not re-educated!
    1. +2
      19 May 2019 12: 11
      In fairness, the first amnesties of Bandera were already under Stalin. And there was no return from Canada. Honestly, these three eastern Galician regions should not have been included in the Ukrainian SSR, but made a small union republic such as Moldavian. And cultivate Galician identity.
      1. -1
        19 May 2019 12: 57
        Quote: Sergej1972
        Honestly, these three eastern Galician regions should not have been included in the Ukrainian SSR, but made a small union republic such as Moldavian. And cultivate Galician identity

        Absolutely right.
  34. -3
    19 May 2019 14: 13
    Somewhat hurt at the very beginning: "the well-known work of Alexander Solzhenitsyn." Always considered it mmm ... "work" vyser. and I will continue to count. Nobel Prize - to take away, a monument in Vladivostok - to demolish.
  35. -2
    19 May 2019 16: 39
    It was necessary to level the howitzers with the ground, and storm with flamethrowers. Once these scum have already forgiven and regretted.
  36. +1
    20 May 2019 12: 18
    Ilyusha, stop raving.
    The boundless steppes of Kazakhstan and its harsh, unusual climate for people from the central zone and the south made its territory, as the Soviet leaders considered it, the most suitable for camps.
    Camps are placed not where people can be harassed, but where it is necessary to develop territories and raise the economy.
    The prisoners of Steplag were taken out to work on the extraction of copper ore and manganese ore, to build enterprises in the city of Dzhezkazgan (a brick factory, a bakery, a processing plant, residential houses and other objects). The prisoners also worked in the coal mines in Baikonur and Ekibastuz.
    You contradict yourself.
    1. +1
      21 May 2019 00: 49
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      . Prisoners worked in coal mines in Baikonur and Ekibastuz.

      This, pearl ... laughing
      In Ekibastuz, coal is mined in an open way. There are no mines. There are cuts. wink The prisoners did not work in the sections. But they carried out repairs and maintenance of equipment (mainly wagons).
      Coal mines in Baikonur, this is generally something .... belay From what sources does the author draw information? Or for him, that Karaganda, that Baikonur ...
  37. 0
    25 May 2019 15: 38
    To eliminate this Judeo-Bandera bastard it was necessary ....... but ..... liberal rot already then hoped to overthrow Russia ....
  38. +1
    25 May 2019 16: 16
    And our pro-defenders, who hate the Soviet people, and the Russians, especially why they pushed their tongue about the American famine, about their concentration camps, where they fell only because of the unemployed, slept on the ground, worked for a cup of beans.
    I'm not talking about such a fact as the murder of their veterans of the 1st World War:
    "The main requirement of the Bonus Army was the immediate payment of the certificates in cash."
    On July 28, 1932, the District of Columbia police attempted to peacefully evict veterans who settled in several buildings along Pennsylvania Avenue. During the evacuation of protesters, a conflict occurred, veterans got into a fight with the police, bricks and sticks were used. Two protesters were shot on the spot. After that, the army entered the battle - Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur used infantry armed with bayonets, cavalry, M1917 tanks, grenades and tear gas to drive rioters out of the city center.
    At 23:11, tanks blocked access to the bridge. The troops then raised the XNUMXth Street driveway. Now none of the protesters were able to enter or leave. The National Guard bloc turned the camp into a trap. When those who did not have time to leave the camp panicked, the infantry entered the camp and fired tear gas. Moving through the rows of huts and shacks, the soldiers began to completely eliminate the camp and the evidence of their terror - the dwellings of the people and the corpses were poured with kerosene and set on fire. "
    Sorry for the Bandera?