The latest ZSU "Derivation-Air Defense" received the Belarusian sighting system

The Russian anti-aircraft self-propelled launcher (ZSU) "Derivaciya-PVO" received an optoelectronic sighting system of Belarusian development. It is reported by TASS, citing a source in the Belarusian defense industry.

As the agency reports, citing the source, the newest Russian ZSU "Derivation-Air Defense" is equipped with a detection and aiming system of OES OP developed by the Belarusian enterprise "Peleng." The complex provides a panoramic overview of the area and a sector overview, which provides for the detection and recognition of air, ground and surface targets at any time of the day.

In addition, the new optoelectronic system allows the use of guided munitions for ZSU.

OEC OPO electronic sighting system at the MILEX 2019 weapons exhibition

OES OP is able to control the guidance of a guided artillery projectile in the laser beam control channel

- A source told the agency, adding that the station includes a laser range finder, a television camera and a thermal imager.

The Derivatsiya-PVO complex was first presented at the Army-2018 forum held in the Moscow region. The self-propelled anti-aircraft gun was built on the BMP-3 chassis, equipped with a module with an 57-mm automatic cannon.

The complex is designed to combat aviation and cruise missiles, aircraft, helicopters, drones, as well as with single MLRS shells, it is also possible to use on ground and surface lightly armored targets. The complex includes a combat vehicle with a high-ballistics gun, a maintenance vehicle and a transport-loading vehicle.

According to open data, the range of destruction of the gun - 6 km, height of destruction, - up to 4,5 km, rate of fire - 120 shots / min. The maximum speed of the targeted objects is 500 m / s. The optoelectronic detection and aiming system of the combat vehicle allows to carry out panoramic observation of the terrain on 360º, as well as to conduct a sector review.

Comments

[CAT BAIYUN]

In how .. We are cooperating with them, but I did not know what they were doing. Well done.

[marshes]

Quote: KOT BYUN

In how .. We are cooperating with them, but I did not know what they were doing. Well done.

So they have been producing pine for a long time. For tanks

[Infinity]

This is all good, but ... I think (purely my opinion) that for our military (and civilian too) equipment, we must use exclusively our components and modules. And then the experience has already been with one "Brotherly Country". And after that you know what events in 2014 we had to urgently look for replacements for many elements. For example, some engines from Motor Sich, or the Soyuz launch vehicle have just now replaced the Ukrainian control system with a domestic one. For no one expected this in 2013.

[Sanichsan]

Quote: Infinity

This is all good, but ... I think (purely my opinion) that for our military (and civilian too) equipment, we should use exclusively our components and modules.

and she definitely own? not an export option?

[Piramidon]

Quote: Infinity

we must exclusively use our components and modules

I agree completely. Who knows what kind of "Maidans" can happen in Belarus. Nobody can give a 100% guarantee that what happened in / in Ukraine will not happen. Therefore, as Emperor Alexander III said, “In the whole world we have only two loyal allies - our army and navy. All the rest, at the first opportunity, themselves will turn against us. " You can buy meat grinders, bicycles, tractors ... but not defense components.

[g_ae]

If everything continues to go on like this, then soon the fleet will not be normal. Only one ally remains. Army. Moreover, with the advent of Taburetkin in the UAC with aviation, it seems, it will be possible to say goodbye too. More Mutko left in the defense industry and left completely kapets. And judging by the events in Yekaterinburg, St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk, then in general the most faithful ally is the Russian Guard. The trend, however.

[Win1945]

Perhaps I will tell you a secret. But in the devices manufactured in Russia, the overwhelming percentage of the elemental base of foreign production, including from the USA and other decaying countries (import substitution so publicized on TV in fact stalls a special trouble in science-intensive products in all directions). It is very funny to watch how screamers calling for abandoning Belarusian products as foreign forget that almost everything produced in Russia from imported components. How will Mr. couch military (patriot) fight this?

[SSR]

Quote: KOT BYUN

I didn’t know what they were doing.

And this moment "puzzled" me.)))

guidance control guided artillery shell

This is how much it is controlled?
Maybe it meant a controlled detonation?
Who can enlighten comrades?

[dmitrii1885]

search the net for "Krasnopol" - a guided artillery shell. I won't say any more, I don't know. for not an artilleryman. but in fact there is one. perhaps there are other varieties already

[SSR]

Quote: dmitrii1885

search the net "Krasnopol"

So compare the calibers! I know about Krasnopol.

Quote: marshes

So he introduces Old to remote detonation.

Woah!

Quote: Gregory_45

for now - with remote detonation, in the future they plan an adjustable projectile.

Thank you so much!
And then under the word "controlled", a little ambiguous feeling. Already from pride I wanted to swell that it was about remote blasting and correction, in such a "small" shell.
PS.
I really like this fighting vehicle.

[marshes]

Quote from S.S.R.

This is how much it is controlled? Maybe it meant a controlled detonation? Who can enlighten and comrades?

The induction rim at the end of the barrel is present, so it introduces the Old to remote detonation.

[Grigory_45]

Quote from S.S.R.

This is how much it is controlled?
Maybe it meant a controlled detonation?

for now - with remote detonation, in the future they plan an adjustable projectile.

[Alexey RA]

Quote from S.S.R.

This is how much it is controlled?
Maybe it meant a controlled detonation?

He is the most programmable fuse response time. Correction of the trajectory of the projectile (as on ORKA from BAE Systems) is not planned.

Tests of guided projectiles for the newest Derivation-Air Defense self-propelled anti-aircraft artillery installation are taking place in Russia. This was announced to TASS by Grigory Zakamennykh, the general director of the company - the developer of the Central Research Institute "Burevestnik" (part of the Uralvagonzavod group, is part of Rostec) at the "Army-2018" exhibition.

"The shells are currently undergoing preliminary tests," he said.

Zakamennykh clarified that it is about managing the time of the projectile detonation along the entire flight path. "The projectile flies along a ballistic trajectory, it is not corrected, but the explosion time can be set," the CEO explained, adding that it is not planned to create corrected projectiles with a variable trajectory in this caliber (57 mm).

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Alexey RA

adding that it is not planned to create adjustable shells with a variable path in this caliber (57 mm).

as if they were going to. With an eye on the British 57-mm munition Mk 295 Mod 1

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Gregory_45

as if they were going to. With an eye on the British 57-mm munition Mk 295 Mod 1

Initially, yes, they wanted UAS (they developed it in KBTM Nudelman).
But the statement of the general director of the vehicle developer (TsNII "Burevestnik") about the rejection of adjustable 57-mm ammunition also cannot be discounted, especially since he made it only last year.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Alexey RA

the statement of the general director of the vehicle developer (TsNII "Burevestnik") about the rejection of the adjustable 57-mm ammunition also cannot be discounted

one says one thing, the other says another. And it seems that all are not the last people in the military-industrial complex. Statements were. I do not convince you that the projectile will be created or will be created. I say that work on it was planned, and even carried out. And they wanted to introduce him into the composition of the BK machine. Therefore, the probability remains.

[Genry]

Quote from S.S.R.

This is how much it is controlled?
Maybe it meant a controlled detonation?

Read: http://nevskii-bastion.ru/zak-57-derivation-pvo/

[Errr]

Quote from S.S.R.

And this moment "puzzled" me.)))

guidance control guided artillery shell

This is how much it is controlled?
Maybe it meant a controlled detonation?
Who can enlighten comrades?

Read here: https://vpk.name/news/225578_v_rossii_nachalis_ispyitaniya_upravlyaemyih_snaryadov_dlya_zenitnoi_samohodki.html

[210ox]

By the way, as far as I know, we buy panoramic sights for armored vehicles from the Belarusians. So far, alas. The same "Pine" is really produced in our country.

[vladcub]

I heard about my "Pine". In general, even under the Soviet Union, the leaders were PO "Horizon", they have long cooperated with the Japanese.
In the journal Science and Life there was a publication: R. M. Gorbacheva, somewhere I heard about high-definition television. She was fired up with the desire that such televisions were produced in the Soviet Union, in America, but such production could only be established: "Horizon" and "Electron". With some tension, Aleksandrov could connect. We made a decision: for the time being we are producing conventional DH, and later we will try HDTV. Soon R. M. died, and then the Union was gone. So the moment was missed to furnish the Americans

[Grigory_45]

Quote: KOT BYUN

We cooperate with them, but I didn’t know

about how)) Immediately it is clear - not a tanker) Belarusian sights are on our armored vehicles, on tanks and infantry fighting vehicles (there is such a JSC "Peleng", maybe you heard? PNM "Sosna-U" - theirs). The company also produces photographic equipment for commercial satellites.

[marshes]

In general, the car is aggressively beautiful, even on the BMP-3 chassis.
Here's a BMPT or a fire support vehicle for you, and the price is probably not that expensive.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: marshes

Here's a BMPT or fire support vehicle

is that true? And how will she fight with tanks?

Quote: marshes

and the price is probably not so expensive

Yeah, anti-aircraft guns cheaper BMPT? On ZSU expensive SLA, more expensive than a conventional tank. Even with passive detection

[marshes]

Quote: Gregory_45

Yeah, anti-aircraft guns cheaper BMPT? On ZSU expensive SLA, more expensive than a conventional tank. Even with passive detection

Yes, here it is not necessary to consider it as an anti-aircraft gun, but as a fire support vehicle.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: marshes

not to be considered as an anti-aircraft gun but as a fire support vehicle

can you explain why?

[marshes]

Quote: Gregory_45

can you explain why?

Because of the guns, or rather the combat module that can be used even on the chassis of the BMP or T-62-72 tanks. The ability to remotely detonate shells. Unlike two 30.
And much cheaper than the BMPT on the T-90 chassis, the price is almost two times more expensive than the T-90 MS, as well as on the T-72 chassis.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: marshes

Because of the guns, or rather the combat module

there is a BM AU-220M "Baikal" (standing on the BMP-3 "Derivation"). With a 57 mm cannon. Why do we need an anti-aircraft gun ???

Quote: marshes

And much cheaper than BMPT on the T-90 chassis

is it in the module, or in the chassis? Do you generally understand that the chassis of an infantry fighting vehicle and a tank have radically different booking levels?
And they didn’t explain how your BMPT should fight tanks? Or shouldn't it be?

[marshes]

Quote: Gregory_45

there is a BM AU-220M "Baikal" (standing on the BMP-3 "Derivation"). With a 57 mm cannon. Why do we need an anti-aircraft gun ???

At Baikal what we showed on Barys, there were no components for remote detonation of shells.

Quote: Gregory_45

And they didn’t explain how your BMPT should fight tanks? Or shouldn't it be?

not with tanks but with tank-dangerous targets or infantry.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: marshes

At Baikal what we showed on Barys, there were no components for the remote detonation of shells

it is not as difficult and expensive to install a detonation system as to carry an "anti-aircraft" control system for firing at ground targets. You'd use a microscope to hammer nails, really, give me such an opportunity ...

Quote: marshes

not with tanks

those. BMPT should not fight tanks at all? A tank is not a tank dangerous target?

[marshes]

Quote: Gregory_45

how to carry an "anti-aircraft" control system for firing at ground targets. You'd use a microscope to hammer nails, really, give me such an opportunity ...

Yes, I’m not talking about this, but it would be nice to have some of the components from the anti-aircraft gun including a ballistic computer, remote detonation with sights that would be part of the common base with the LMS.

[BARKAS]

Unas on the "acacia" was a 3SH2 projectile with an electronic fuse; it was bad just that it was forbidden to shoot this projectile and there were 9 thousand shooters!

[marshes]

Quote: BARKAS

Unas on the "acacia" was a 3SH2 projectile with an electronic fuse; it was bad just that it was forbidden to shoot this projectile and there were 9 thousand shooters!

152, they came up with a lot of things, but here we have a conversation on 57.

[Pattor]

We also have a sight from Belarusians. Very similar in appearance. So for control, there is a laser control channel in the sight. So he works for the projectile.

[sivuch]

Sorry, where's the news? that the ECO is Belarusian, has always been known.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: sivuch

where is the news?

netute. And for the sights, and for the derivation itself has been known for a long time ...

[awg75]

Why do we step on the same rake ??? only yours should be

[Dude]

Why do we step on the same rake ??? only yours should be

Well, this is in an unattainable ideal .. I think it’s not worth bending the stick. Belarusians, in general, of the remaining 14-and former republics, the least allowed themselves to doubt.

[tech3030]

It is good that Belarusians supply us with complexes for tanks, for another. Our where?

[Alexey-74]

A good example of cooperation with Belarus, but after Ukraine, there are concerns already ..... or maybe all the same, do your thing completely in Russia ...

[APASUS]

This information about Belarusians is pleasant to read. Here I am only confused by the amount of equipment purchased for the Armed Forces, how many have bought this "Derivation-Air Defense"?

[bogart047]

not enough problems with another "brotherly" country? Has experience taught you nothing?

[Bodipancher]

Replace the machine gun hanging from the side with Kord + a couple of Pturov. There will be an ideal, almost universal fire support vehicle suitable both for motorized rifle units and for marine corps and airborne forces with short-range air defense functions of course.