What can we say about the accuracy of AK-203 shooting

Kalashnikov Concern experts continue to engage in research and at the same time demonstrate the capabilities of the concern’s enterprises weapons. In the next issue, a test is presented on how heap shooting AK-203 can be. Also checked mount riflescope for the machine in this series.

First, it should be noted that AK-203 recently received the necessary documents authorizing the export of such weapons. AK-203 itself is the development of the so-called "weave" (the hundredth series of Kalashnikov assault rifles). The machine is equipped with a Picatinny rail.

Shooting test character is conducted on three targets from a distance 100 m. Accuracy and reliability of mounting optics is checked after five single shots with further disassembly of the machine.

As a result, the STP (average point of impact) in the first and second firing practice was rejected slightly to the right with a general defeat of the target. After the third shooting, as the shooter himself points out, the STF is “excellent” for 4's shots, and with the fifth shot, the lead is fixed from the main group of hits.

As a result, the expert states that the accuracy of 4 shots for AK-203 is high - within 6 cm, and disassembly of the machine does not affect accuracy.

Comments

[Pessimist22]

At 300 meters, check accuracy, at 100 it is not interesting.

[dvina71]

Quote: Pessimist22

At 300 meters, check accuracy, at 100 it is not interesting.

YES, and so everything is clear. 2 MOA, not a sniper weapon .. The accuracy of manipulating the cap does not affect .. we would also check how the removal of the sight setting affects ..

[Black sniper]

It would be interesting to know what the accuracy of firing a burst is?

[aws4]

yes, but the question is how much this cover will show itself in a year two operations

[Evil echo]

And can I clarify - a year or two or two operations in what conditions?

[aws4]

I specify at least in the normal part in peacetime .. firing once a week or two, guards and races in half a year field exit .. anyone already understands that for a year of operation in the field or database this cover will play so that the installation on her sight can be forgotten

[Peter Ivanov]

That's just in the hands of a soldier and all the cranks fall into the product. Who saw the AKS-74 that did not crawl out of the fighting in the DRA? Put IT in those conditions ... I think that few people will agree IT with themselves in battle.
A translator of fire would take a product, maybe a pistol grip. Butt I prefer wood - paddle! So reliable! And these picatinny cakes ... you can also put them on the side bar AKM / AK-74 if you wish, they will tear the whole form when moving, and this dirt collector is one hundred percent and an ordinary soldier needs nothing!

[SASHA OLD]

Quote: aws4

yes, but the question is how much this cover will show itself in a year two operations

backlash through a couple of hosts and ...

[pv1005]

Quote: dvina71

Quote: Pessimist22

At 300 meters, check accuracy, at 100 it is not interesting.

YES, and so everything is clear. 2 MOA, not a sniper weapon .. The accuracy of manipulating the cap does not affect .. we would also check how the removal of the sight setting affects ..

Quote: dvina71

still would check how the removal of the installation of the sight affects ..

Affects, but if at competitions on accuracy and accuracy (at least when performing MV-12 for sure).

[Peter Ivanov]

Sorry for the stupidity! Who is this man? With optics, and such "results" of shooting and only 100 !!!! meters ???? His front sight runs from left to right !!! With each series, NEW STP, WAHXX !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Karoshiya akhtomat !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[i] video. [/ i] [b] [/ b] ... Until this "automatic machine" falls into the hands of a Russian soldier!
In my DRA, AKS-74, the second category (new !!!! removed from storage, immediately transferred to the second category). When shooting from the hip, the butt spontaneously folded!
In our people, there is still NO CULTURE "my machine gun", "my scuba gear", "my parachute", etc., etc.! A disregard for everything around, will lead this "machine" to ... trash!
First, the receiver lid will fail ... a neighbor, the commander or the soldier himself will step on it and violate the alignment ... In general, here the carriage is dead! Who fought will see!
NOTHING TO DISCUSS!

[SASHA OLD]

well, this Kalash is still better than ak-12/15: I mean there is no heap of "pins" (pins) to squeeze out which "you have to poke into this hole" (which will be hammered first of all), this option is closer to the idea of ​​Mikhail Timofeevich ...
but to put sights on even though three times reinforced receiver cover ... well, okay, when a weapon has one careful owner, who takes it to "shoot" once or twice a week - there are no questions.
And when it’s a soldier, let’s a contractor, the second or third owner at the machine, counts on the passing of the norm, flies on the move to the ground and the machine falls on the top of the tree / kamenyuku with the cover of the receiver ... there’s nothing on the old Kalash - the cover was simply bent back , even when it was twisted into a spiral (for this you need to step on it with your foot and ride, disconnected, there was a case once).
For mounting of this kind, not a single part of the weapon is suitable, which is easily removable (movable / reclining), I understand that this should be done on AR-shaped rifles, there the aper and the barrel are rigidly connected and nothing will be broken when disassembling, but only the first one a month, well, two, I don’t know how well the loop was made there, but even if the quality is like that of the right-handed Honda - it’s still a moving unit, which means a weak spot.

[bone1]

The author does not need to talk about the accuracy of shooting AK-203-just lay out the shooting table

[pv1005]

When shooting from AK-74 at 100 meters after a 10-year break in practice, 92 points out of 100 possible were knocked out from the first run. Earlier in his "childhood", conventionally shot a lot. What is shown in the video, this weapon fell into the hands of the dude for the first time. The receiver cover fixed "rigidly" was still on the AKS-74U. The company with him fired 1 UUS on EXCELLENT, the remainder of the BP was usually 4-6 rounds. On bringing the weapon to a normal battle before the new KMB, for such a dispersal the company commander would be "killed".

[Uncle Sasha_027]

SCAM - THIS MOVIE. At first glance, the points -)).
1) The shooter does not hold the handle at all ---)) So they shoot only when lying in the shooting range and still have a basin under the belly-))
2) Shoot with a collimator further than 100 meters - burn cartridges !!! The collimator is the most shitty sight, which is used only in close combat, in conditions of poor visibility of the sight.
3) And the phrase at the end of the video is that the new model beats more than the old one -)) Yes, he’s a sucker at all! And here is the model? The barrel length is the same, the production is the same, the bolt group is the same - how do the parameters differ from the old model? Ponty? Or strabismus arrow? If both models have equal wear and tear, there will be no difference.

[silversnow]

3) On the new machine, the tolerances have been reduced, the barrel profile has been changed, and you, dear "expert", do not meddle in what you do not understand.

[riwas]

With AK to shoot at a distance of more than 100 m must be single. I was convinced from my own experience.