Hypersonic X-60A GO1 rocket in the USA is being prepared for flight tests

54
The research laboratory of the US Air Force informs the media about the readiness of the initial version of the hypersonic project. X-60A GOLauncher1 (GO1). It is noted that all the preliminary work, including work on the design of the rocket completed, and everything is ready to launch the initial phase of production.

Hypersonic X-60A GO1 rocket in the USA is being prepared for flight tests

X-60A after separation from carrier




US Air Force spokesman Daryl Meier quotes Jane's US portal:

Currently, under the GO1 program, bench tests of onboard systems are conducted. We are starting to design elements as part of a hypersonic missile project.


Tests are conducted at the Cesil test site (Florida). An important detail is noted: tests are being conducted at the test site, which is operated by the Federal aviation US Administration (FAA), not the Pentagon. According to Mayer, this primarily emphasizes the commercial focus of the project and helps to reduce the number of "intersections" in testing other systems to which the Pentagon has a solution.

It is noted that two flight tests of the X-60A will be conducted in the 2020 year. At the same time, the rocket’s customer is not satisfied with its speed indicators.

It is known that the X-60A rocket is equipped with Ursa Major Technologies “Hadley” single-stage liquid-propellant rocket engines. Liquid oxygen and aviation kerosene are used as working media. This engine so far allows a speed of slightly more than 5 M to be developed. The rocket itself is launched from the Gulfstream III carrier. Earlier it was noted that the system is capable of speeding up in 8 M, however, at the moment this information has not been confirmed.

Customers GOLauncher1 declare that their project can be used purely for scientific purposes. For example, with its help it is planned to investigate microgravity in orbit, to study astrophysical processes.

It is stated that the device being created should launch nanosatellites into orbit - literally hundreds. The total “nanosatellite” load will be by mass up to 450 kg. The mass of the carrier itself is 1,1 t. To increase the speed parameters of the system, the bar of the maximum payload is planned to be lowered.
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    12 March 2019 09: 02
    Hypersonic X-60A GO1 rocket in the USA is being prepared for flight tests


    The flywheel of the race went ...
    1. +1
      12 March 2019 09: 07
      Quote: cniza
      Hypersonic X-60A GO1 rocket in the USA is being prepared for flight tests


      The flywheel of the race went ...

      Why they left, they came to that. Well, we did not start. "And the eternal battle" ...
      1. +2
        12 March 2019 09: 09
        And we, hopefully, will not be chasing, this is now their turn.
        1. -1
          12 March 2019 09: 11
          Quote: cniza
          And we, hopefully, will not be chasing, this is now their turn.

          So it should be. Let them catch up now.
          1. +2
            12 March 2019 09: 12
            Not just catching up, but on the edge and uphill.
            1. +4
              12 March 2019 09: 39
              Judging by the data in the text, this is more of a mini liquid fuel rocket to launch satellites into space from which they are trying to make a hypersonic cruise missile. In some ways, it is an analogue of the Dagger. That is, without a ramjet hypersonic engine. The Americans refused to call the dagger because of this a hypersonic missile. The hegemonic image requires an answer to our designs. Although it is far-fetched.
              Quote "The Russian Zircon hypersonic missile will be launched for the first time at the end of 2019 from a Project 22350 frigate Admiral Gorshkov, a source in the military-industrial complex told TASS on Tuesday." http://in24.org/technology/35527
          2. -2
            12 March 2019 09: 31
            Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
            Quote: cniza
            And we, hopefully, will not be chasing, this is now their turn.

            So it should be. Let them catch up now.

            Not really, because our Zircon is not yet in production, and they have their own achievements, for example X-51A Waverider, so let's see who will be in front.
            1. -2
              12 March 2019 09: 32
              Quote: RUSS
              Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
              Quote: cniza
              And we, hopefully, will not be chasing, this is now their turn.

              So it should be. Let them catch up now.

              Not really, because our Zircon is not yet in production, and they have their own achievements, for example X-51A Waverider, so let's see who will be in front.

              Yeah. We will see.
            2. +1
              12 March 2019 09: 53
              Quote: RUSS
              Not really, because our Zircon is not yet in production, and they have their own achievements, for example X-51A Waverider, so let's see who will be in front.

              We also have achievements that were long before the X-51 is the X-90 GEL.
            3. -3
              12 March 2019 11: 08
              Quote: RUSS
              X-51A Waverider

              By the way, our TV showed a photo of this rocket passing it off for Zircon laughing
      2. 0
        12 March 2019 10: 05
        Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
        Well, not we started.

        Just we started. And it pleases. Let them catch up now.
        1. 0
          12 March 2019 10: 07
          Quote: Gritsa
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          Well, not we started.

          Just we started. And it pleases. Let them catch up now.

          I'm talking about withdrawing from the Bush Jr. treaty in 2003. Without any explanation.
    2. +1
      12 March 2019 09: 33
      No, the era of hypersound has begun.
  2. +3
    12 March 2019 09: 03
    They rushed in pursuit!
    Now we need not to stop, but to lead.
    Plus, you need to work out the fight against hypersonic missiles.
    1. -2
      12 March 2019 10: 54
      Quote: Victor_B
      They rushed in pursuit!

      Boeing began to test supersonic missiles in 2010, and now Generation Orbit Launch Services has also joined the development.
  3. -1
    12 March 2019 09: 16
    Those positions that Russia has already taken in the hypersonic race are certainly pleasing. We were the first to create and launch missiles in a series, but the countries technologically developed have rushed to catch up, and it is very important to be one step ahead.
    1. 0
      12 March 2019 10: 28
      Here you have to work with your brains. That is, one must be a cut above! wink
    2. -4
      12 March 2019 11: 34
      Quote: Alexey-74
      We were the first to create and launch a series of rockets

      They didn’t let the series go, and when it’s not clear, don’t get ahead of events.
  4. +2
    12 March 2019 09: 16
    And someone under the news about the "Dagger" convinced everyone that if there is a liquid-propellant engine, then this is not a GLA. There must be a scramjet "otherwise unshielded"))) Here we are unlikely to notice them in this.
    "Commercial use" is undoubtedly fun. The Pentagon is simply funding from the shadows to bring the dual-use developments into the military sector. Conversion, on the contrary, is already commonplace.
    1. -4
      12 March 2019 09: 44
      And someone under the news about the "Dagger" convinced everyone that if there is a liquid-propellant engine, then this is not a GLA. There must be a scramjet "otherwise unshielded"))) Here we are unlikely to notice them in this.

      And now I say that the dagger is not a hypersonic war rocket.

      With a distorted presentation of the title of the article and non-objective phrases in the article itself, the author presents the X-60A as a hypersonic war missile. And many visitors were led to this.

      X-60A is not a combat missile for use in the atmosphere. This is a common commercial rocket for the output of equipment into space. And all the rockets going out into space are not called hypersonic. Hypersound is from 5 to 7 Machs. What is above 7 Machs is already the first cosmic speed, above 11 Machs the second cosmic speed.
      The ramjet engine cannot work in space, it needs atmospheric oxygen. That is why the X-60A has a liquid-propellant rocket engine to achieve a speed of 7 Machs and launch satellites into orbit. It's like Unions, Atlases, Arians. But all these rockets are not hypersonic, they operate at the first cosmic speeds of 7 Machs. X-60A is a semblance of Falcon-9 Ilon Mask for commercial launches and as a competitor to Falcon, as well as for a variety of carriers.
      1. +1
        12 March 2019 09: 51
        Do you know that the first space speed is 7,9 km / s, and the second space speed is 11,2 km / s? 7 MAX is 2,3 km / s. Otherwise, I agree.
        1. -6
          12 March 2019 10: 07
          Do you know that the first space speed is 7,9 km / s, and the second space speed is 11,2 km / s? 7 MAX is 2,3 km / s.

          In order not to bother, I wrote above 7 Machs.
          1. 0
            12 March 2019 22: 13
            Quote: Tarkhan
            In order not to bother, I wrote above 7 Machs.

            For example, 8M is not the first cosmic speed, not even close.
      2. +1
        12 March 2019 10: 08
        The engine type can be any. The classification as a GLA is based on the principle of the possibility of movement in the atmosphere at hypersonic speed, and the "aircraft", according to the principles of flight, can be either atmospheric or space. Scramjet is not a mandatory feature, but one of the possible.
        Therefore, any rocket moving in the atmosphere with hypersound and capable of maneuvering is GLA.
        And the insinuations with the Mach number at the altitude of the GLA flight in the comments of some "writers" are just a mess in their head about this concept and the speed of sound.
      3. +2
        12 March 2019 10: 09
        Quote: Tarkhan
        What is above 7 Machs is already the first cosmic speed, above 11 Machs the second cosmic speed

        1st space speed ~ 7,9 km / s, i.e. more than 20M
        1. +1
          12 March 2019 15: 28
          1st space speed ~ 7,9 km / s, i.e. more than 20M

          I agree. Confused.
      4. 0
        12 March 2019 22: 12
        Quote: Tarkhan
        Hypersound is from 5 to 7 Machs. What is above 7 Machs is already the first cosmic speed, above 11 Machs the second cosmic speed.

        How much pathos was in your messages, but it turned out that this was just illiteracy.
  5. -1
    12 March 2019 09: 29
    It is noted that all preliminary work, including work to create design rockets completed

    It looks like there will be a fairy tale again ... Well, like how they tested the SAM-3 rocket, which is capable of eliminating false targets, though the target was without false targets, but they tested, yes ... Even successfully.
    Well, most importantly, the design is done, the rest is nonsense! You can start PRODUCTION, do not care that there were no tests of experimental models, and six months ago it was even said loudly that there weren’t even hypersonic technologies, and even bastings
  6. +4
    12 March 2019 09: 30
    From the text of the article: "General "nanosatellite" the load will be up to 450 kg in weight. In this case, weight of the carrier itself - 1,1 t".
    It cannot be, because it can never be! No need to fool people.
    1. +3
      12 March 2019 09: 48
      Why? The competitors can - by the way, the first launch is already very soon (weeks + have a solid contract with OneVeb for 36 launches), but they cannot.
      1. 0
        12 March 2019 10: 58
        The two-stage LauncherOne has a starting weight of more than 15 tons. This is what is called, feel the difference. And her payload is much more modest - up to 300 kilograms. smile
        1. +1
          12 March 2019 11: 14
          And, so in mass, there is an obvious cant wink . Maybe 1,1 is a prototype, and total from 10, at least for space.
          1. 0
            12 March 2019 11: 34
            Even if the comma was there by mistake, I can only call this joint a game. No matter how you draw common sense to the text. This is what kind of breakthrough technologies should appear in Generation Orbit Launch Services in order to wipe their nose to their compatriots from Virgin Galactic, if they, with a launch mass of the carrier of 11 tons, will throw up to 450 kilograms of payload into space with similar parameters for their colleagues from Virgin in 15 tons and 300 kilograms, respectively? Here, even with the naked eye, one can see, as they say, "two huge differences." smile
    2. 0
      12 March 2019 09: 50
      Why? It may well be that if the range of this product is not more than 400 km (the S-400 rocket having approximately the same weight, flies at a speed of up to 2100 m per second (and this is even more than 5 M) at a distance of about 380 km
      1. 0
        12 March 2019 10: 01
        Well, this is a typical liquid rocket for launching into space with a mini prefix because of its size and the ability to launch from a plane, albeit a large one. Something between Buran and Dagger. That is, this is not a hypersonic cruise missile, but an attempt to make an analogue of the Dagger .Different things.
      2. 0
        12 March 2019 10: 17
        In my opinion, the new 40N6M has a speed of 9 MAX at a range of 500 km.
        1. +1
          12 March 2019 10: 44
          Please look at the maximum target hit height and mass of 40N6M and try to understand how a rocket weighing 1100 kilograms can reach at least the Karman line if a 40N6M rocket with a launch mass of 1893 kilograms can reach only 30 kilometers? Yes, while still pulling into outer space 450 kilograms of nanosatellites? And it is unlikely that these same nanosatellites will operate in a 100-kilometer orbit. Most likely they will need to be dragged much higher.
          1. 0
            12 March 2019 10: 53
            According to some reports, the interception height is 185 km. You show me a picture with export truncated missiles. With the letter E.SM-3, in my opinion, it intercepted a satellite at an altitude of 247 km. How much does the blank weigh there?
            1. 0
              12 March 2019 12: 02
              I have not yet found data on the "log", but it is unlikely that at a final speed of about 3 km / s it has a mass of more than 20 kg.
      3. 0
        12 March 2019 11: 03
        Nikolay Ivanov
        Why? It may well be that if the range of this product is not more than 400 km (the S-400 rocket having approximately the same weight, flies at a speed of up to 2100 m per second (and this is even more than 5 M) at a distance of about 380 km

        A rocket with a launch weight of 1100 kilograms will not reach "space" even without a payload. And even with an air start. Well, not at all.
  7. +1
    12 March 2019 09: 34
    Cartoons Disney Studios?
  8. +1
    12 March 2019 09: 43
    The US Air Force Research Laboratory reports to the media that the initial version of the X-60A GOLauncher1 (GO1) hypersonic project is ready.

    Has the "hypersonic" prefix become mainstream? How does this unit, in addition to its size, differ from the HYPERSONIC Pegasus that launched the first satellite into orbit twenty years ago?
  9. 0
    12 March 2019 09: 48
    Even Mach 5 is 6000 km h, when they come to replace tomahawks that had a speed of 800 km h, it will be serious, the only question is, what carriers will be besides the B-52 (the rest are unlikely to take such "cigars")
    1. -1
      12 March 2019 10: 34
      Since the Tomahawks at low altitude, these missiles will not go. Speed ​​is too high, not really maneuvering. And that means more likely detection and destruction. But that is not all. Such missiles, by definition, cannot be many. For the material from which they will be made is too expensive.
      1. 0
        12 March 2019 10: 43
        This is essentially a missile-launch vehicle for launching cargo into space. Is it not easier then to make a ground-based missile-launch vehicle?
  10. 0
    12 March 2019 10: 21
    An article is a separate set of unrelated sentences. About the main goal of developing this missile, not a word at all.

    "AFRL is developing the X-60A to increase the frequency of flight tests at hypersonic speeds, which is expected to lower the cost of maturing hypersonic technology."

    Source: http://nevskii-bastion.ru/hypersonic-x-60a-usa/
    MTC "NEVSKY BASTION" AVKarpenko
  11. +3
    12 March 2019 11: 15
    So this is not a military missile. Space light class. She is to launch ultralight satellites.
    A number of companies are now working on the launch of light space rockets from aircraft.
    1. 0
      13 March 2019 09: 04
      Naturally, Alexey. What warheads are there! Only microsatellites!
      1. 0
        13 March 2019 11: 03
        So it is possible to suspect the Unions in secret intentions: supposedly it flies to the Station, and it’s fucking! - The Pentagon in the middle of the roof ... am
  12. +1
    12 March 2019 13: 33
    "The X-60A hypersonic missile is being prepared for testing ..." It is known that the X-60A missile is equipped with Ursa Major Technologies "Hadley" single-stage liquid-propellant rocket engines.
    Soooo! And where is the dude who kicked himself in the chest, arguing with me that there is one "truth" -American, which says that only a CD with a hypersonic ramjet engine has the noble right to be called a "hypersonic device" ?? what Dude in the studio! angry Americans have to give up little by little, even in terminology ... For a long time, after "sputnik", "leonit" was not included in the English language ("novichok" does not count!) Let them get used to it!
  13. 0
    12 March 2019 17: 50
    fake nus full-length, microsatellite carrier = hypersonic weapon, that's five, keep the ax
    1. 0
      12 March 2019 22: 16
      Quote: viktorish007
      ax

      Is it a typo or hitting?
  14. Cry
    0
    12 March 2019 18: 56
    The smelly kerosene, so 60 years ago stood in the kitchen.
  15. 0
    13 March 2019 09: 02
    Customers GOLauncher1 declare that their project can be used purely for scientific purposes. For example, with its help it is planned to investigate microgravity in orbit, to study astrophysical processes.
    You can still solve the following problem: will humanity survive after the massive use of these babies with nuclear charges. Naturally, only in terms of scientific curiosity.

    But in fact, such weapons will once ruin the world, can we stop? Let's try to live peacefully?