Geopolitical mosaic: the Ku Klux Klan was not allowed to clean up the garbage on the road, and McFaul was to blame for the Syrian crisis.

50
“Mom, I didn't do this!” How today conveyed RIA News" With reference to the Vremya newspaper in Kazakhstan, the Kazakhstan border guard Vladislav Chelakh, suspected of killing fourteen colleagues and huntsman at the border post in Alma-Ata region, whispered to his mother that he had not killed anyone.

The date of the mother and son was recorded on a video camera and lasted only five minutes. "News"Quoting the words of the mother of the border guard Svetlana Vashchenko, who are quoted by the newspaper" Time ":

“I was taken to a small room. Following a few people flew with a video camera. They filmed us all those 5 minutes that the meeting lasted so that Vlad didn't say anything extra to me. I burst into tears, approached my son, he hugged me and whispered in his ear: “Mom, I did not do this!”

The woman claims that she saw a bruise on her son’s cheek.

Stones for UN observers. "Vesti"referring to ITAR-TASS, they report that UN observers were unable to enter the city of Al-Haff: they were stopped by a crowd that surrounded their cars. UN Secretary-General Spokesman Martin Nesirke said that "the crowd, consisting of residents of the area, began to throw stones and iron rods into UN vehicles."

Geopolitical mosaic: the Ku Klux Klan was not allowed to clean up the garbage on the road, and McFaul was to blame for the Syrian crisis.


And when the convoy headed back to Idlib, they tried to shoot her. Now the blue berets have returned to the bases and are safe. UNMIS personnel are trying to reach El Haffa from June 7, but armed confrontation in the area prevents them from doing so.

"Vesti" also reported that US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said yesterday that the US is concerned about information about sending Russian attack helicopters to Syria. In particular, she said that America “is worried by the latest information that we have, that on the way from Russia to Syria there are attack helicopters. This will lead to a very dramatic escalation of the conflict. "

Attack helicopters from Russia? As the Rosbalt, the Russian side is currently not commenting on Clinton’s statements. But the Pentagon official said that the US Department of Defense does not have information about the delivery of Syria’s helicopters by Russia: “I don’t see any reports that Russians are delivering attack helicopters to Syrians.”

Iran has begun to develop a heavy nuclear submarine. He writes about it "Lenta.ru" With reference to the Iranian agency FARS, which Rear-Admiral of the country's Navy Abbas Zamini told about the submarine about 12 on June.

According to him, the experience gained in the construction of nuclear power plants and the use of atomic technologies in medicine and agriculture will help the Iranian specialists to create an atomic-powered vessel. The representative of the Navy emphasized that the development of nuclear engines for submarines does not go beyond the civilian application of atomic technology.

Technical characteristics of the first Iranian nuclear submarine are not specified.

Lenta.ru reminds that at the end of May 2012 in Iran the repair of the heavy Tareg submarine built in Russia according to the 877EKM Paltus project was successfully completed. In addition to this submarine, two more submarines of the same type are in service with the Iranian Navy: Nur and Eunice.

In addition, the Iranian underwater fleet includes a submarine "Nahang" and sixteen light submarines of the type "Gadir" of its own design.

Temporary exemption from oil sanctions. America will exempt 7 countries from sanctions, which have significantly reduced the volume of purchases of Iranian oil. 11 June reported by the agency "Reuters" with reference to the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, reports "Lenta.ru".

India, South Korea, Turkey, Malaysia, South Africa, Sri Lanka and Taiwan will be excluded from the sanctions list. Sanctions against these countries will not be applied for at least six months. It should be noted that Singapore and China were not excluded from the list (the latter is the largest buyer of Iranian oil). Sanctions on China and Singapore will be introduced on June 28.

"Tape" recalls that in March this year, the United States refused to new sanctions against several countries in Europe and Japan.

The Yemeni army defeated the city of Jaar from the Islamists. This was reported yesterday "Lenta.ru" with reference to Reuters.

In the battles for Jaar, at least 24 people died: 20 militants and four Yemeni military. The Islamists left the city on the night of June 12 - earlier than President Saleh’s troops entered. The rebels retreated to the city of Sucre (information from France-Presse, referring to one of the locals). In Shukre, according to some sources, Yemen’s al-Qaida leaders are hiding.

Residents of Jaar reported that the Islamists left leaflets in the city asking for forgiveness from the local population for the fact that their territory was the center of an armed conflict.

In Côte d'Ivoire, a coup attempt was foiled. As transmits ITAR-TASS, Côte d'Ivoire’s law enforcement agencies thwarted an attempted coup d'état that was planned by supporters of former President Laurent Gbagbo. The conspiracy was organized by a group of servicemen.

Speaking yesterday on national television, the head of the country's Interior Ministry, Hamed Bakayoko, said several conspirators had been arrested. Also found documents that reveal the details of the plan to overthrow the newly elected head of state Alassane Ouattara. As the minister noted, after the coup, the criminals were going to announce the creation of a transitional military administration in the country. In support of his words, Bakayoko demonstrated excerpts from a recorded video message to the people, which the rebels intended to broadcast on the air after the coup.

Hugo Chavez - presidential candidate. The current president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez 11 June registered as a candidate in the election of the head of state. Reports about it "Lenta.ru" with reference to BBC News.

The 57 year-old politician, the president of Venezuela since 1999, is set to fight again for the presidency. Elections are scheduled for October 7 2012.

On the day Hugo Chávez was registered as a candidate, thousands of his supporters took to the streets of Caracas. Smiling Chavez addressed them with a speech, and also sang a folk song and dance.

To the Falkland issue. In the Falkland Islands, with the support of the British government in the first half of 2013, a referendum on the status of the territory will be held. The Falklands government announced this on June 12, reports "Lenta.ru" with reference to France-Presse.

For several decades, the islands have been the subject of a dispute between the UK and Argentina. In 1982, troops from Argentina landed on the islands, whose government considers the Falklands to be theirs. The consequence of the landing was 74-day war, which resulted in the death of Argentine 649 and British 255 soldiers.

As the chairman of the legislative assembly Gavin Short notes, the residents of the islands are quite satisfied with the status of overseas territory of Great Britain, and they will say this in a referendum. Short also said: "We definitely do not want us to be governed by the government in Buenos Aires, and this immediately becomes obvious to everyone who has visited the islands."

France is going left. As reported RIA News"The French Socialist Party and its supporters last Sunday successfully spoke in the first round of elections to the lower house of parliament - and can get an absolute majority in the second round. The lower house (National Assembly) has the final word in legislative procedures.

In the last election, it turned out that the left-wing parties won the majority of the votes. According to preliminary data of the French Interior Ministry, about the 34,5% of voters voted for the Socialist Party and its closest allies, and the “greens” that concluded with it allied got 5,4% of votes. "Left Front" got 6,7%. Union for a Popular Movement received 27,2%.

As noted, the elections were held at a record low turnout - 57,4%.

According to forecasts, in the second round, leftists can receive from the 283 to 329 seats in the lower chamber, and 10-20 must also receive the “environmentalists”. Socialists have a chance to get an absolute majority in the National Assembly (289 seats), write "News", even without blocking with the "Left Front".

Julian Assange requests to re-open his case. RIA Novosti correspondent Elena Pakhomova reports from London that the founder of the portal "WikiLeaks" Julian Assange filed a petition to the Supreme Court of Great Britain. He asks to reopen his case. This informs the public British media, citing a representative of the court Ben Wilson.

In May, the Supreme Court rejected the appeal of Assange and decided to extradite him to Sweden. There he is suspected of committing sexual offenses, including rape.

However, there are no precedents with the reopening of the case after the decision was made in the Supreme Court. Therefore, the procedure for the consideration of such an application is missing. Ben Wilson could not name the time frame for the application.

The defense of Assange relies on the fact that a British court has made a decision on the basis of evidence and evidence put forward by the Swedish prosecutor's office. The defense of Assange did not have the opportunity to carefully examine this evidence.

Now the court has to determine how justified such a motivation is. It is noted that the UK did not consider the question of Assange’s guilt, but only decided how relevant Sweden’s request to extradite the suspect was appropriate.

Oil becomes more expensive. How today conveyed from New York ITAR-TASS correspondent Andrey Bekrenev, Tuesday's trading on the New York Stock Exchange ended with the growth of the main quotes. The most important indicator of business activity in the United States - the Dow Jones index - rose by 162,57 points (1,31%), reaching a point in the 12573,80 points. The 500 Standard & Poor's Index, which includes the 500 of the largest companies in the US market, added 15,25 points (1,17%) to the “weight” and reached the 1324,18 point. The NASDAQ e-exchange index climbed to the 33,34 point (1,19%), reaching the point in the 2843,07 point. The largest growth was shown by shares of companies in the industrial, commodity and financial sectors.

Oil prices rose. Futures contracts for the supply of oil in July were concluded at the price of 83,32 dollars per barrel, which is 0,62 dollars higher than June's 11.

The Ku Klux Klan wanted to sweep one mile of the road, but the authorities refused. The Department of Transportation of the US state of Georgia did not allow the local office of the Ku Klux Klan to participate in the federal program for voluntary garbage collection “Adopt a highway”, reports from New York correspondent ITAR-TASS Alexander Bekreneva.

Roadside garbage collection program has existed in the USA since the 80s. Anyone can pay for garbage collection on a stretch of at least one mile long, or send their volunteers for this. Trash sponsor can set on your site advertising banner.

In late May, representatives of the far-right Ku Klux Klan approached the Georgia Department of Transportation for permission to "adopt" a mile-long mountainous stretch of road. They received an answer yesterday. The letter explained that for security reasons and due to historical specific features of the organization's activities, a permit for garbage collection cannot be issued.

The secretary of the Ku Klux Klan branch, April Chambers, said: “We just want to“ adopt ”the highway. We do this not for the sake of self-promotion, but to keep the mountains clean. ”

It is not the first time when the Ku Klux Klan is seeking the right to scavenge on the highway. In 1994, the office of this organization in Missouri submitted an application to the local transport department, but the authorities rejected it. Also against the participation of the Ku Klux Klanov in cleaning the roads expressed the US Department of Justice. The Ku Klux Klan did not remain silent, and it came to the Supreme Court. The latter recognized the ban on the participation of the Ku Klux Klan in cleaning roadside debris contrary to the constitution. However, as noted, the K Klux Klan banners hung in Missouri for long. The fact is that members of the organization did not scavenge.

Obama's rating goes down. On the eve of the presidential election, Barack Obama is rapidly losing popularity with voters. A month ago, the current US president was ahead of his main rival, Mitt Romney, by 7%, and now by just 1%. This is reported "Vesti" with reference to the rating agency "Ipsos".

According to surveys, the rating of Barack Obama has long been going down. His current rating is the lowest for the last six months.

US grateful to Russia for Afghanistan. Corr. ITAR-TASS Dmitry Kirsanov reports from Washington that the USA is grateful to Russia for the logistical support of the antiterrorist operation in Afghanistan and does not consider the Afghan issue in conjunction with the Syrian crisis. Yesterday, at the briefing for journalists, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Media Relations Captain John Kirby stated this.

According to him, Russia is “extremely useful” in Afghanistan. “And we are grateful for the assistance they (Russians) provide in relation to logistics routes to and from the northern part of Afghanistan,” said Kirby.

Commenting on Senator John Cornine’s appeal to US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to terminate the contract with Rosoboronexport for the supply of combat helicopters to Afghanistan and restore unilateral sanctions against Russia, Kirby and the Pentagon press secretary George Little made it clear that the Pentagon will not do that.

On the strong military ties of Israel and the United States. MIGnews.com reports that US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta received Israeli President Shimon Peres at the Pentagon. Now Perez is on an official visit to Washington, where he is to receive the Medal of Freedom from Barack Obama.

Leon Panetta said that the military cooperation between the United States and Israel "has never been so strong, stable and dynamic."

Peres told the Americans that Israel feared Iranian ambitions. Driven by the “imperialist-inspired ambitions of religion”, Iran, according to Mr. Peres, plans to “take control of the Middle East”.

Says Colonel Zusman. "MIGnews" writes that Colonel Adam Zusman, commander of the rear services of Dan District (Tel Aviv and the environs), said yesterday: “In the event of a rocket attack in the center of Israel, especially using non-conventional weaponsleading to the destruction of buildings, residents of Tel Aviv and surrounding cities will be evacuated and relocated to other parts of the country. ” The colonel, however, did not indicate where it is planned to transport about two million residents of Dan County.

The unnamed military sources referenced by the DEBKAfile resource claim that the evacuation will take place mainly in the southern areas of the Negev desert.

Colonel Zusman stressed that Israel is in danger from Iran and its allies: the Hezbollah and Hamas terrorist groups.

Zusman added that Israel has one of the “most complex” air defense systems in the world, but cannot fully rely on any system when it comes to global protection. He said: "We are preparing for the worst scenario."

A dead al-Qaida leader made a video message. RIA News" with reference to Reuters, it is reported that Abu Yahya al-Libi (his real name is Mohammed Hassan Qaed), the second person in al-Qaeda, whom the US government declared killed last week, made a video message. It was posted on the Islamist website.

Al-Libi called on the Islamists to support members of armed groups waging war against the Syrian authorities. He said: "We urge our brothers in Iran, Jordan and Turkey to come to the aid of their brothers."

Reuters notes that it’s impossible to date the video. However, it is noted that reports of the death of al-Libi have been received through the world media before, but later it turned out that the information was unreliable.

McFaul is to blame. The US ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, is getting, it turns out, not only from the Russian side, but also from the west.

Nick Cohen from The Guardian (translation source - "InoSMI") writes that the inability of the West to voice a threat that would reduce violence in Syria is embodied "in the pitiful figure of Michael McFaul, the US ambassador to Moscow." The figure of McFaul, according to Cohen, is not only pathetic, but also ridiculous: after all, Mr. Ambassador "desperately wants to please, that he doesn’t realize that everyone laughs at him."



What is the fault in front of Western countries McFaul?

It turns out that he is like our Chernomyrdin: he wants the best, but he succeeds - as always.

McFaul, Cohen writes, is a liberal, but the results of his work are far from liberalism. He "is guided by the best of intentions, but gets the worst results." At the same time, Cohen walked through the article on the Obama government, noting that Michael McFaul was “the true representative of the Obama government.”

According to the journalist, McFaul is guilty of "resetting", as well as of slowing down the resolution of the Syrian conflict. Finally, the ambassador is guilty of his own illusions, born of a misunderstanding of what constitutes the Russian dictatorship.

“The failure of Western diplomacy in Syria,” according to Cohen, turned out to be “the bloody destruction of illusions. The United States, Britain, France, Turkey and the League of Arab States have given way to the Russian veto. While they were worried about the ethics and practicality of “liberal intervention”, the dictatorship was doing its best to “illiberal intervention” in what happened in the country, resembling a Spanish civil war. ”

A Western journalist ascribes the murder of 108 to a man in Hoole, disregarding even minimal arguments, to "Baathist forces." Cohen further writes: The “progressives” of the last decade did not understand that dictatorships are rarely a rational response to Western crimes. They have their own reasons, which do not cease to act when a liberal appears in the White House. Autocrats do not consider themselves thieves and megalomania. Criminals do not recognize what they are - it is against human nature. They ennoble their thirst for power by seeing themselves as the only people who can keep order and keep the country from falling apart. ”

Democracy and human rights in the eyes of these “criminals” and “autocrats” are “no competing ideologies or legitimate demands of noble opponents”, but “subversive doctrines of the imperialist West, against which all dictatorships must unite to oppose it”.

“On paper,” says Cohen, “corrupt capitalist Russia, communist Cuba, Baathist Syria, and Islamist Iran have nothing in common.” But they will always stand in a united front against liberalism. ”

Michael McFaul, according to Cohen, “is not an idiot, at least not obvious. An eminent academic, he helped organize the reset of Obama's Russian policy. He shared the government’s assumption that as soon as the Kremlin realizes that there are prudent men and women in power in Washington, it will cooperate. ”

But the trouble and the fault of McFaul is that “with all his education,” he “did not understand what a dictatorial mind is. He arrived in Russia in January, when the opposition movement against kleptocracy grew. Putin, like Assad, had to blame foreigners for what was happening and convince his supporters that they were defending their homeland from conspiracies of foreign enemies, and not the legitimate discontent of the oppressed Russians. McFaul was the most accessible goal, so that the state media vdarili on it. Sneaky journalists accused him of being the "puppeteer" behind the protests. When he met with dissidents, the state broadcasters, who were clearly aware of his schedule, tracked him down. Putin’s supporters published videos comparing him to a pedophile. ”

As a result, the journalist reports, McFaul came to humiliation in front of Moscow: “By the last week, McFaul was just as hypocritical as Malvolio when he meekly accepted the Kremlin’s curse on him.”

Another misfortune and fault of Ambassador McFaul is that he “did not understand that the“ reset ”was only from the West. For Putin, nothing has changed. ”

Summing up what Cohen wrote, we can say that the West still would like to see Russia, as well as some other countries, for example, Iran, not only with their ideological opponents, but also enemies of liberalism in all its forms - from "human rights" to " freedom of speech. "

Well, it must be admitted, to have a permanent external enemy - the position is convenient and time-tested. Against the background of a prickly ideological opponent, you can always seem soft and fluffy, even if the needles stick out of the ears.

The Nobel Prize shrank. RIA News" referring to the official website of the prestigious world award, the Nobel Prize will be reduced by 20% this year - from 10 to 8 million Swedish crowns (1,1 million dollars) this year. As the reasons for reducing the amount of the premium, the threat of destabilization of the financial fund from which payments are made is indicated.

“One of the most important tasks of the Nobel Foundation is to ensure the security of the economic base of the award. Thus, the capital left by Alfred Nobel requires management, which will allow to present the financial component of the award indefinitely and at the same time guarantee the independence of awarding institutions, ”the Nobel Foundation Board of Directors said in a statement.

The revenues from the fund’s activity, alas, have ceased to cover its expenses lately. In addition to the size of the prize, the costs of maintaining the fund's administration and at ceremonial events held during the presentation of awards will also be reduced.

Thus, it must be stated: the global economic crisis has knocked on the door of the Nobel Foundation.

Observed Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    13 June 2012 11: 17
    The Nobel Prize shrank. Not otherwise than out of shame for which laureates she has recently blessed with a peace prize, one "marked" is enough to burn out with shame. Thanks to the author for the excellent review! Oleg, keep it up +++++ !! drinks
    1. Aleksey67
      +11
      13 June 2012 11: 23
      Quote: Tersky
      Shame on what laureates she had recently been blessed with a peace prize

      To blame it for Obama, she blushes and shirts. So peaceful that he can’t sleep if the next peaceful war is not unleashed.
      Oleg, as always, thanks for the review. It's time for McFaul Oleg to pay for "PR" laughing
      1. +10
        13 June 2012 11: 26
        Quote: Aleksey67
        To blame it for Obama, she blushes and shirts.

        Lesha, once the Nobel Prize was in non-politics, and it has already been turned into an instrument for mixing go --- on. where the world is heading, soon we will surely shout - "Stop the Earth, I will go down" fellow
        1. 755962
          +4
          13 June 2012 17: 14
          In addition to limiting payments to Nobel laureates, the costs of holding ceremonies related to the presentation of prizes will be reduced. After a couple of three years of such a crisis, "Knock at the door.
          -Who's there?-
          -You package .-
          -Sign up, and get a registered letter-
          -Thank.-
          -Please .- "No comment ............
    2. +1
      14 June 2012 14: 24
      Tersky,
      Yes, the laureates have become notable, half of even schoolchildren have crossed out for incompetence and inconsistency with the principles of the prize.
      It was necessary to give the Peace Prize to Hitler and not Obama. Oh, he is definitely a peacemaker compared to a striped black.
  2. +7
    13 June 2012 11: 19
    Hugo Chavez let him become president. The dead leader of al-Qaeda made a video message. The fact that he was killed is a special disinformation of the Americans.
  3. +11
    13 June 2012 11: 23
    Clinton saw on TV last night, and had a nightmare at night. I think it is connected or not? The review is good, mcfol and cohen are two pair boots. Whoever controls America, the country will still be d .... m!
    1. +10
      13 June 2012 11: 27
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Clinton saw on TV last night

      Sasha, how much to tell you, do not watch horror films at night, especially if in the main role of Hillory .. laughing
      1. +12
        13 June 2012 11: 56
        This horror was called news! I’ll drink TV, I will treat my nerves.
        1. +7
          13 June 2012 12: 00
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          I’ll drink TV, I will treat my nerves.

          What are you talking about!?? wassat What about football? what
          1. +6
            13 June 2012 12: 05
            Sanya after the European Championship will gladly buy a telly from you for medicine. laughing
            1. +4
              13 June 2012 13: 46
              Zhenya, as Lelik used to say, one tablet is enough. I will go to share. Tablets for every taste. Environmentally friendly product. For Sanka, even using Stealth technology, we’ll do it.
              1. +2
                13 June 2012 14: 32
                Sanya hi, drag the pills-URGENT!
                Selling a / m Nissan Gloria 2002g.v, after an accident - inexpensive.
                1. +2
                  13 June 2012 14: 47
                  No TV, no tablets. Gloria will take in the appendage. a nanotablet after all.

                  When you open the letter, open your mouth and close your eyes for a greater effect. For side effects, the product has not been tested. Share your feelings. the main thing is do not interfere with alcohol and do not listen to the engine, yes. Yes Yes Yes Yes.
                  1. +3
                    13 June 2012 14: 59
                    Sanya, I read what you wrote 2 times.! I have a question, what are you smoking there? Yes Yes Yes. I suppose some kind of grass.
                    1. +3
                      13 June 2012 15: 05
                      I drink tea, they said green tea. but I also feel something is wrong.
                      1. Aleksey67
                        +2
                        13 June 2012 15: 08
                        Quote: vorobey
                        I drink tea, they said green tea. but I also feel something is wrong.

                        Sash, be careful there, take care of yourself. Maybe you just "pecked" cannabis or fermented berries, than you there still feathered "catch up"? laughing
                      2. +2
                        13 June 2012 15: 18
                        You see what effect. I say one nanotable is enough. And all is well with you. Clinton is a beauty, McFaul is the cleverest man, the puppeteers are collecting pioneers, There is complete harmony in the world, etc.
                      3. +3
                        13 June 2012 16: 31
                        Sasha, for such tablets of 10 years you can severely grab it, although as I understand it now you are deeply parallel to nirvana.
                      4. Aleksey67
                        +1
                        13 June 2012 16: 38
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        for such pills about 10 years can be severely grabbed, although as I understand it now, you are deeply parallel to nirvana.

                        These are nanotablets, you will not see them in any microscope, which means that there will be no evidence base.
                        Freedom for the birds from the vile encroachment of opponents of nanotechnology !!! laughing
                        Nanotablets in the macro community !!!! laughing Chubais on nanonars in a nanocamera to macrophalossoid rapists !!! wassat
                        Thank you sparrow for the nanotablet, it's been "flattening" for 5 days feel
                      5. +1
                        13 June 2012 16: 51
                        The main world and a lot of love. drinks
      2. +5
        13 June 2012 21: 54
        Here are some of the scariest creatures on planet Earth!
    2. +1
      13 June 2012 14: 38
      In general, it is true, although the Americans themselves are kind and naive people. One can only guess where these imperial ambitions come from ...
  4. borisst64
    +4
    13 June 2012 11: 23
    "Michael McFaul, according to Cohen, -"not coming, at least not obvious. Distinguished Academician, he helped orchestrate the reset of Obama's Russian policy "

    Comments are redundant !!

  5. +5
    13 June 2012 11: 27
    Excellent overview "+" drinks
  6. Fost325
    +5
    13 June 2012 11: 52
    US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul gets both from ours and from theirs, the poor fellow got into trouble. laughing
  7. scrack
    +5
    13 June 2012 11: 58
    McFaul is the same clown. We must make a scandal for him with a cleaner
    1. Aleksey67
      +8
      13 June 2012 12: 02
      Quote: scrack
      McFaul is the same clown. We must make a scandal for him with a cleaner

      For him, a scandal with a cleaner is better. A cleaner for a normal guy, like Strauss Kahn, and for a clown, a dwarf cleaner is just right laughing
      1. Goga
        +4
        13 June 2012 13: 53
        Aleksey67- Greetings, Aleksey, I think so - we need to take care of McFaul - who else will play along with us like that and soak off such "jokes"? What if they send a clever one instead? At least where in their department would they be smart ... bully
        1. Aleksey67
          +3
          13 June 2012 15: 06
          Quote: Gogh
          I think so - we need to take care of McFaul - who else will "play along" with us and will soak such "jokes"?

          Igor, I agree that there is more benefit from him than harm. He "leaked" the agents of the State Department, "lowered" our positioners and, again, "wets the crusts" better than Zadornov. Let it remain, again it is easier for Oleg to write Geomosaic, one piece of news 100% Makfolovskaya laughing
          1. Goga
            +2
            13 June 2012 17: 06
            Aleksey67 - Aleksey, well, that's "okay", we will wait for new "gadgets" from the MF and their funny comments from Oleg ... good
            1. +3
              13 June 2012 17: 25
              Quote: Gogh
              Alexey, well, that's "okay", we will wait for new "lotions" from the MF

              Igor, Lesha, this "fruit" will not keep you waiting long. He has obligations to Russia for four years ahead ... I repeated and I repeat - to keep it like the apple of my eye! A rare case of a clinic in diplomacy, just unique laughing
              1. Goga
                +1
                13 June 2012 17: 35
                Tersky - Victor drinks , "swept away" to protect! bully
                1. +1
                  13 June 2012 17: 52
                  Quote: Gogh
                  "swept away" to protect!

                  Well now I'm calm !!! drinks !! wink
  8. patriot2
    +6
    13 June 2012 12: 11
    While McFaul is our ambassador, there will always be a good occasion for satire.
    A sort of "whipping boy".
    They are horror films to us, we are the news of the day.
    Article +
  9. Svistoplyaskov
    +5
    13 June 2012 12: 20

    OBAMA BACK! COOK LUSKS CLAN IN AN Ambush!
    1. Guran96
      +5
      13 June 2012 13: 15
      Barack Obama is our president! Ku Klux Klan.
  10. raptorr
    +2
    13 June 2012 12: 49
    I think Chelah did not kill anyone. Could not.
    Iran has begun to develop a heavy nuclear submarine - a little laugh.
    In the Falkland Islands, with the support of the British government, a referendum on the status of the territory is kosher in the first half of 2013. Cut off all questions to the territory in the foreseeable future.
    1. +1
      13 June 2012 14: 41
      And what confuses the fact that Iran has begun to develop a heavy submarine? Airplanes do, but boats can't?
  11. pribolt
    +3
    13 June 2012 13: 21
    Oleg + good review. And the Chinese on the drum American sanctions for Iranian oil
    1. +1
      13 June 2012 14: 42
      The Chinese are generally well done. It seems that they generally all the political fuss on the drum. They live for themselves, develop ...
  12. Odessa
    +1
    13 June 2012 13: 53
    Oleg, thanks, as always on top. Such muddy news, so tell +!
  13. 11Goor11
    +2
    13 June 2012 13: 59
    Reuters: yesterday, UN observers were attacked by Assad's military disguised as civilians, stones were thrown at the observers on which the Zarya NGO mark was found, 500 observers were injured !!!
  14. vladimir64ss
    +2
    13 June 2012 14: 07
    McFaul is to blame ------ hysterical comments on inappropriate behavior. Thanks for the review.
  15. Sehiru san
    +2
    13 June 2012 14: 19
    Thanks for the review. But it would be better if Russian shock turntables came to Syria ... They are very needed there.
  16. +2
    13 June 2012 14: 22
    Very high quality review. To the author - respect.
    From all I want to highlight:
    - In France, socialist populists, using Arb money, have squeezed Sarkozy from power, and now Le Penovtsev will slurp. And it will be hotter than a reasonable Sarkozy.
    - Argentina should not stop fighting for the Falklands, despite all the referendums. In the last war, a couple of tankers and an in-air refueling system were missing. And the air-to-surface missiles were not enough. Otherwise, the results would have been different.
    - Hugo Chavez is an eagle! Good luck to him and all the people of Venezuela!
    - The Nobel Prize has lost weight - this is not the main thing. The bad news is that over the past few years, the Nobel Committee is ooh *** and has been driving the market. They will give the Brokeback Award, then a little black one ... And all this discredits the idea itself. And in the field of science, the prize is given for discoveries of many years ago. So everything is shitty there.
  17. +1
    13 June 2012 14: 44
    The article is, as always, a plus. and it follows that the world is still a mess! There is no stability ...
  18. +1
    13 June 2012 15: 16
    Thanks to the author for a great review.
  19. SoVIet ZiMBo_O
    +1
    13 June 2012 15: 44
    McFaul at least did not please?
    He also fusses and pushes money into the mouths of our "oppositionists" and pushes students to speak, oh, sorry, sorry, he's a diplomat, and for this the US has other people, well then it's really funny!
  20. Ruslan
    +3
    13 June 2012 19: 41
    Tatyana Doctor of Political Sciences, Full Member of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems V. Pavlenko

    The Great Game of the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers: in the light and in the shade

    On May 30, 2012, information appeared about the agreement under which the Rothshild Investment Trust “Capital Partners” (“RIT“ CP ””), owned by the Rothschilds, acquired a large stake in Rockefeller Financial services (“RFS”) , managing the Rockefeller family business and other affluent families in the United States.

    Placed by almost all the leading world and Russian media, it was accompanied by similar and superficial comments, the essence of which was that the two largest clans of global oligarchs formed an alliance for “joint resistance to a new round of the global crisis”.

    In fact, there is nothing more distant from reality than such statements.

    The fact is that the strategies of both oligarchic groups in recent years have been lined up according to the principle formulated by Rothschild biographer Frederik Morton: "Today, the family seeks to make its presence in the world invisible and inaudible."

    This is understandable: big and, especially, very big money prefer silence. But it was this silence that broke 30 in May by the attention that was focused on the event, which vividly demonstrated the real weight of these leading clans not only in the global economy, but also in global politics.

    In our opinion, commenting on the emergence of a new “alliance”, financial analysts, apparently, simply confused the cause with the effect: it was the global crisis itself that was the product of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, and not vice versa. How exactly it happened, we will try to understand now.

    So, in short, what happened means, perhaps, not the surrender of the Rockefellers to the Rothschilds, but at least a very substantial surrender of their positions.

    If you “dig” deeply, you need a detailed analysis with a historical excursion - otherwise it will be almost impossible to understand something in this situation.

    Therefore, we start with the background of the question:

    The real knot of contradictions between these two global clans are the two world wars of the 20th century. Moreover, in both cases they were unleashed by the Rockefellers, and it was they who reaped the rewards of success.

    When it became clear that France and Britain could not cope with Germany, and because of the February Revolution, Russia dropped out of the war, the Rockefellers set the Standard Oil of New Jersey to allow the oil empire to develop. Rothschildam oil wealth of the Middle East.

    Since 1927, Standard Oil has taken over 25% of IPC shares - the Iraqi Oil Company, which was established in 1912, under the name TPC - Turkish Oil Company. At the same time, 50% of the shares were then transferred to the ownership of the government of the Ottoman Empire, according to 25%, they received Rothschild's Shell, as well as Deutsche Bank, which got into their clip a bit later.

    Unlike their temporary partners (who, most likely, didn’t even know that they were temporary), the British “knew the future” - because they themselves planned it, realizing that after the collapse of Germany and the Ottoman Empire in World War I they as winners, they will take all 100%. - continuation further

    It would have happened if the Entente could defeat the Germans on the battlefield. But for the European allies, this task turned out to be daunting, and US assistance was needed - General Pershing's expeditionary corps, who decided the outcome of the war on the western front (which, unlike the Second World War, was then decisive).

    The entry of the United States into the war in order to induce the British to fulfill the conditions set by them was imposed on the American government in a variety of ways. First of all, with the help of "backstage" pushing to the provocative acts of "underwater" war, widely used by Germany itself. The Germans did not want, and could not, because of financial dependence on the Rockefellers: in 1914-1916, they provided large loans for not only the Kaiser, but also his Ottoman allies, having received a shadow influence on their policies.

    The decisive reason for the US to withdraw from neutrality and to enter the war was the drowning of the German submarine Lusitania passenger transport, the preparation of which by backstage diplomatic maneuvers very much resembled the threshold of the Japanese attack in December 1941 on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor. Then after the next meeting with F.D. Roosevelt, US Secretary of War Stimson wrote in his diary: "We have touched on the sensitive issue of diplomatic actions to ensure that Japan takes the first and erroneous step - the step of undisguised aggression."

    It is not a special secret that both events have the same roots.

    We can not say that the Rothschilds did not interfere with all this. Their main and hereditary political creature in the United States, Colonel House, who called himself “the power behind the throne,” devoted the whole 1914 to the year trying to put together a Western alliance against Russia with the participation of the United States, Great Britain, France and Germany. “England would not want to completely crush Germany, because then she would face one-on-one with her old enemy, Russia; - House wrote to President W. Wilson in May 1914 of the year, - but if Germany infinitely expands its fleet, England will have no choice. ”

    In order to preserve the right of choice for England (and the Rothschilds, who for a hundred years already controlled its central bank), House even made a voyage to Berlin, where he received an audience with Kaiser Wilhelm II and Minister of the Sea von Tirpitz. All is in vain: the German fleet, with the Rockefellers' money (compensated, by the way, by the Federal Reserve Act by the American treasury), grew by leaps and bounds and the British could not stay away from the war, thus transferring all political trumps to the Rockefellers.

    In World War II, the economy became even more dependent on politics.

    When the Germans attacked France in May 1940, the French-British group was quickly defeated, the French signed a truce, surrendering Paris, and the British were pressed to the English Channel in the area of ​​the Belgian Dunkirk.

    Along with the “strange war” of 1939-1940’s fall-winter, one of the main secrets of the Second World War, which baffled historians, there was always the question: why did the Germans, instead of finishing the enemy, cross the La Manche stood up and did not take a step forward until the British had taken the personnel to the British Isles. Moreover, the exported transports were not bombed.

    A "casket" opened very, very simple.

    The fact is that if Hitler was not directly employed by the Rockefellers (although such an assertion is not excessive either), then he completely depended on them in the military economy and, above all, in oil and refined products, primarily gasoline. Facts and figures - from the creation of Basel Bank of International Settlements in 1930 for the purpose of financing the Nazis to Standard Oil in 1934, 730, thousands of acres of land near Hamburg and the construction of an oil refinery on them - abound. But we will not overload the material with them in order not to drown in details and particulars.

    And the people who brought Hitler to power were in the USA - the same brothers Allen and John Foster Dulles (Rockefeller brothers cousins). And all of them were led by a “three-headed” one, the American-British-German octopus — the Schroeder Bank (which had the status of an agent of the Nazi government), and also the firms associated with it (the current G. Schroeder — the offspring of those Shreders).

    And Roosevelt, who with the help of the same House, was brought to power by the Rothschilds, in fact turned out to be the creature of the Rockefellers. It is not by chance that House himself surrounded by the new president was replaced by B. Baruch, a large exchange speculator (like Soros), who significantly improved his affairs as chairman of the US military industry committee, which he occupied throughout World War I.

    A small touch: when the US intelligence services in 1943 reported to Roosevelt about the possibility of “removing Hitler,” he categorically forbade it.

    But they tried to do it, but in July 1944, the British. Having concluded a truce with the "new" German government, they very much hoped to draw the US into the confrontation with the USSR and destroy the planned Soviet-American alliance. (It was, however, destroyed, but in a different way: instead of the chief architect of the New Deal, G. Wallace, the Rothschild's G. Truman's creature was extremely “timely" brought to the White House, who, shortly before Roosevelt's death, became vice-president, and then the president of the United States).
    1. Ruslan
      +3
      13 June 2012 19: 42
      On all of this, Hitler clearly followed all the instructions of the Rockefellers. And the instructions in May 1940, he received the following:

      - Do not touch the English in Dunkirk;

      - not to cross the English Channel and generally leave Britain alone, turning the preparations for Operation Sea Lion (the invasion of the British Isles);

      - to deploy its efforts in the direction of the “plan of Barbarossa” - preparation for an attack on the USSR.

      Hitler carried out these instructions punctually.

      But why did he get them at all?

      But because Churchill, on the verge of collapse in the situation with Dunkirk (who reminded him and the British public the nightmare of the failure of the Dardanelles operation of the British fleet, during which he, as First Lord of the Admiralty, then insisted), agreed to fulfill all the conditions that Roosevelt put to him (by the way, they were cousins) in exchange for the protection and military assistance of the United States. Namely:

      - transfer to the Americans the oil “pearl” of the British Empire - Saudi Arabia (which the British intelligence and, for example, TE Lawrence of Arabia, literally “plowed out” for the crown, literally plowed out the Ottoman Empire) for the crown;

      - withdraw all British capital from the United States and sell all property held by the British in the United States to the Americans;

      - after the end of the war - to dissolve the British Empire, giving independence to the colonies (began, as we remember, from India - 1947 g .; for the British colonial empire, the rest of the "Rothschild empire" - the French, Dutch and Belgian crumbled to 1960).

      Thus, - many experts (primarily Western ones) involved in global history and politics talk about this - the main reason for the two world wars was nothing but the seizure of the Eurasian oil assets from the Rothschilds and the Rockefeller consolidation. That is why Germany was twice set against Britain (Hitler, like the Kaiser, the Rockefellers regularly financed the whole war). Roosevelt’s new “alignment” in 1944 personally dictated to the Halifax ambassador of Britain to the States (the same bailiff of the “Munich conspiracy”, who had successfully negotiated with Hitler in November 1937): Saudi Arabia - America, Iran - Britain, and Iraq and K We will “milk” together.
  21. Ruslan
    +3
    13 June 2012 19: 46
    Having conceded, twice, to the brute force and circumstances, the Rothschilds did not forget and did not forgive the “offenses” inflicted on them.

    The hot war ended and the cold war began.

    If the Rockefellers are primarily an “oil” dynasty, then for the Rothschilds the main thing is “gold” and other precious metals. These are their main areas of influence and control.

    Therefore, the Rothschilds began to dig under the dollar, setting the goal of replacing it with gold (we recognize that from this point of view, the dollar’s ​​decoupling from gold collateral, implemented by R. Nixon in 1971) looks a little different.

    The main lever for this is the price of gold. It is established not by market but by directive. Since the mid-1940s, twice a day, without breaks on weekends and holidays, the London Association of the Precious Metals Market has held so-called “fixations” in which five banks participate: the head bank of the British Rothschild branch, NM Rothshild & Sons, to their French branch “Societe Generale” (we still need it), memorable from the “Turkish-Iraqi” deal of the 1910s - 1920s “Deutsche Bank”, the Chinese “branch” of the Rothschilds - the global bank “Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp. » (“HSBC”), which grew up in the XNUMXth century on the drug trade, as well as the world leader in gold and precious metals trafficking, ScotiaMocatta, a division of Scotiabank Global Banking & Markets.

    These fixations are carried out, of course, at the NM Rothshild & Sons site and, moreover, it was this bank that invariably chaired them until 2004 (and then Pharisee “went into the shadows”).

    We will not list all the vicissitudes of the unfolded inter-clan struggle. We only note that over the past decade, gold has risen in price more than 10 times, and the dollar is weakening due to the exorbitant national debt of the United States, the creation of which at the beginning of 1980's led to the Rothschilds again, with the help of the famous “Reaganomics”, that is, inflating "financial bubbles."

    And what, one wonders, Reagan still had to do when the commission he created headed by the chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve P. Walker (a protégé of the Rothschilds) “found out” that in Fort Knox (the US gold reserve) gold - only foreign and private. It was necessary to somehow finance the “Strategic Defense Initiative” and other innovations in the arms race, to which the Brezhnev and Andropov leaders of the USSR were, as it were, “accidentally” tackling. So Reagan began to inflate "soap bubbles", erecting "Potemkin villages" and "castles in the air" with their help. It was then that the United States and appeared national debt.

    The United States would have reached "the handle" much faster than it is now - about the year of 1995, but they were very lucky with the collapse of the USSR, which the Rothschilds were already preparing with the help of communications in our country. Without going into particular details (another topic), we single out only the main figures in this chain: Beria-Kuusinen (the connection of the Comintern with Freemasonry) -Andropov-Gorbachev; besides them, Mikoyan and Kosygin got into this chain (and not at all on the sidelines).

    The Rockefellers were not particularly interested in the collapse of the USSR.

    Moreover, for them the Soviet Union was a counterweight to the Rothschilds. The Rockefellers equally supported both the Nazis and Soviet industrialization. Unlike them from the eternal rivals of the Rothschilds, they needed a balance of “brilliant isolation” not governed by London, but a united Eurasia with all its oil. Potential leaders of the continent, in view of the presence of passionate ideologies (albeit opposed), they saw both Hitler and Stalin, whoever won, but only with their own indispensable control (this required bringing both countries into an internecine war challenge the USA).

    In addition, having received a concession share of Baku oil at the end of 1920, the Rockefellers, already with Hitler’s hands, tried to finally take it into ownership, having calculated, however, on this at Stalingrad. (The “economic” nature of the 1942 military campaign, in contrast to 1941, when the political centers of the USSR became the target of the Wehrmacht’s attack, indicate many modern specialists, including German ones).

    Beating his unexpected "fellow travelers", I.V. Stalin in 1945 year became an independent figure of global scale. Unknown, unlike the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the Molotov-Hiss Pact, concluded in 1944-1945. At the United Nations Conferences in Dumbarton Oaks and San Francisco, and sponsored by the future governor of New York and the vice president of the United States, Nelson Rockefeller, was an unpleasant surprise for the American political establishment. From now on, he shouldn’t have to poke his nose into the affairs of the peoples of the USSR and the countries of Eastern Europe, as well as Moscow, in “British” Iran and “American” Saudi Arabia. (In the days of Hiss’s McCarthyism, according to the denunciation of one of the novice members of the commission on anti-American activities, R. Nixon was even convicted of “spying for the USSR” - that’s how annoyed!).
    1. Ruslan
      +3
      13 June 2012 19: 46
      The situation, unfortunately, has radically changed after the death of the leader. Strengthened in power as a result of the five-year period of “palace coups” (1953-1958), Khrushchev, being a Trotskyist, “exposed” the notorious “personality cult” and with the help of Mikoyan turned to the Rothschilds. With little that Brezhnev who understood these layouts, Kosygin, and especially Andropov, gained strength. Not having time to realize his destructive “European project” in life, the all-powerful KGB chief “spawned” Gorbachev, who launched this project before being elected general secretary, concluding a number of secret agreements on redistributing spheres of influence in Europe with the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne in 1984 Otto von Habsburg.

      That is, on the one hand, the Rockefellers could not rely on the Gorbachev USSR to withstand the pressure of the Rothschilds. And, on the other hand, by the end of the 1980-ies, due to the accumulated public debt, there was a threat of the collapse of their patrimony - the United States.

      And the Rockefellers turned into the path of least resistance: they joined the collapse of the USSR together with the Rothschilds: the final consensus on this issue was reached in 1989, at a closed meeting of “influential people” (annual Bilderberg Conference) held on the Spanish island of La Toja. (In the same place, in spite of the desperate resistance of M. Thatcher, who cost the “iron lady” of an early resignation from the post of British prime minister, it was decided to unify Germany).

      With the help of the collapse of the USSR and at our expense, the Americans managed to close many “holes” in their economy and finances. The figures of how much and what exactly was taken out of our country by the 1995 year, October 24 1995, at a closed meeting of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US military, named B. Clinton (they were very impressive at the beginning of the 2000) ).

      At the same time - we must pay tribute to the Rockefellers - they prevented the collapse of the Russian Federation, including with the help of Yeltsin (who, unlike Gorbachev, spoke in favor of the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation). And not only Yeltsin.

      What was looted in the former USSR was enough for America for twenty years. And again, the national debt overcame, and again the States - “at the last line” (14 trillion dollars of total debt is not one annual budget).

      What should the Rockefellers do if the United States does not? Brzezinski, in his new book, Strategic Vision: America and the Global Power Crisis (saw the light of 2012 in February), explicitly writes that the United States today resembles the USSR before its collapse and is considering two options for global development, with or without American leadership that is, if you call a spade a spade, without the United States.

      In addition to the crisis in the eurozone, the massive exodus from Wall Street of top managers of large financial companies and corporations, which began in the spring of 2012, strains the global situation. (These “cadres” in the financial space and on banking areas are well oriented both day and night: they know when, where and what it smells like and where, with what smell and how quickly to run).

      Just in case, the Rockefellers today are buying up land in Argentina and Chile. But throwing a white flag (or a towel on the ropes) seems to be considered premature.

      The Rothschilds, in turn, are pressing.

      F. Hollande in France - their creature.

      A. Merkel is now in loneliness in the European Union and in deep defense within the country. Oriented to Britain, according to V.D. Yezhov (the Soviet biographer Adenauer), the Social Democrats "take" one federal land after another (recently, symbolically important municipal elections in North Rhine - Westphalia won). New Rockefeller "exceptions" in the form of Schroeder number XXUMX in the SPD is not expected.

      The parliamentary elections in Germany, meanwhile, are already in the 2013 year, and the victory of the SPD will mean the consolidation of the entire Eurozone by the Rothschilds. And then instead of the “European state” built by the Rockefellers since Hitler's time, the EU will turn into a mosaic divided into municipalities - chaos, which, if anything, unites, it is devoid of any national and religious identity (and therefore completely suits the Rothschilds) “zone free trade. " And in this chaos they will drag in (they are already drawing in!) The CIS and Russia, starting with Ukraine, Moldova and the Baltic states, where chaos, in fact, already rules the ball.

      In the US, B. Obama is the creator of the Rothschilds: in June 2006, the boss of the Democratic Party was represented by none other than J. Soros - the closest associate of the Rothschilds.
      1. Ruslan
        +3
        13 June 2012 19: 47
        In Russia, the Rothschilds control the "family" that had fallen to their side under Yeltsin-President; Voloshin plays a key role in promoting her political interests. They also have a common business with the oligarch Deripaska, and through him - with the creatures of Chubais - the oligarchs Potanin and Prokhorov (it is from here that both the legs and the horns of all the "orange", "snow" and "swamp" street protests grow in Moscow).

        Chubais is the most cunning of all: he has connections with the Rothschilds (through former US Treasury Secretary L. Summers, who heads the National Economic Council in America), and with the Rockefellers - he is a member of the board of directors of the global bank JP Morgan Chase. The goal is simple and clear: in any case, stay afloat - and in fact “floats”, “does not sink”!

        Especially important for the Rothschilds China.

        If the Chinese elite succeeds in “crushing” (and, judging by the split that began in connection with the “Bo Xilai case”, this unfortunately began to turn out), the Rothschilds will be able to “hook” gold on the yuan. And carefully build it into the status of a new global reserve currency, secured not with oil, like a dollar, but with gold (for this, gold is also inflated in price).

        If this number passes, then soon the dollar and the US themselves can be brought down (about which, unfortunately, many people have long and naively been dreaming of us as something very positive).

        For what?

        To create the “North American Union” with the new Amerеро currency, and then the “Transatlantic Union”, in which North America, in full accordance with the “global plan” of the Club of Rome, would unite with Europe, and the Amero with the euro. And a “real” world currency would have turned out: a pound sterling, probably — what else? (This Atlantic Transformation project is provided for by the Texas Agreements, which in March 2005 were concluded by the top officials of the NAFTA member states - the North American Free Trade Area).

        But this “shift” - from dollar to pound (presumably) - needs a “stabilizer”. According to the Rothschilds plan, they should be the yuan, backed by gold (the price of which the Rothschilds, as we have seen, are set by themselves), as well as backed up by the military and political power of the PRC.

        By the way, against the background of the union, and more precisely the purchase of the Rothschild Rockefellers, China and Japan with 1 June came out of mutual dollar calculations, and will now be calculated strictly in yuan and yen.

        This tale, however, for naive simpletons. The yuan and the yen are brought to a common denominator only through an equivalent (EMC is a single measure of value). Previously, this equivalent was the dollar (it is controlled by the Rockefellers). And now?

        Since it does not say what it is, it means that the role of the EMC goes to gold. And this gold equivalent (standard), from the price of which mutual Chinese-Japanese calculations will make a start, will already be controlled by the Rothschilds.

        That is, "sly" China and Japan imposed the immediate prospect of a change of global financial power. In other words, the Rockefellers "passed" another milestone. And after that, apparently, they requested a truce. It is a truce, not the world.

        Similarly, the Rothschilds in the 1917 and 1940 years asked the Rockefellers for a "truce" in the inter-clan struggle (and for American military aid to Britain against Germany).

        Debt, as they say, is beautiful!

        The Rothschilds now, like the Rockefellers then, kindly agreed. This is the inner meaning of the “historic” agreement from 30 of May 2012.

        With the background we have completed. We turn to the essence of the agreement.

        So, the business component of the Rothschild-Rockefeller Alliance looks like this: the aforementioned RIT “CP” group, headed by Jacob (Jacob) Rothschild, bought 37% of RFS shares.

        Immediately, a very piquant detail comes out: under the control of Rothschild's “buyers,” there are only 3 billion dollars, and under the control of Rockefeller's “purchased” - 34 billion (just a little less than 40 billion).

        How so?

        However, everything falls into place when we recall that this share in 37% was previously owned by the French bank Societe Generale - that same member of the London gold fixings.

        But in the 2008 year, when this bank bought Rockefeller’s aforesaid share, it had assets worth 71 billion dollars under management - 2 times more than what it bought.

        And now these 37% from the giant have passed to the dwarf, which, it turns out, owns the assets of another giant.

        What does all this mean?

        First of all, the fact that the “truce” of the Rockefellers was requested in 2008 year. But then, apparently, they decided to once again "crush", the result of which was the Sino-Japanese agreement on mutual settlements.

        So by 2012, the position of the Rockefellers had deteriorated further.

        But why does Jacob Rothschild's company have a total of 3 billion dollars, when the state of the family is estimated at least on a scale from 2-s to 20-trillion, and some “hotheads” generally call the number in 300 trillion? (Here we need to make a reservation that the famous Forbes list, which shows us the top bar of personal fortunes at 64 billion dollars, does not take into account the main thing - collective, family capital, in fact, hiding them, which, apparently, was calculated).

        The very same thing about the 3-x billions is in the internal scenario of the Rothschilds.

        The group initially had five branches, then their number decreased, and, ultimately, there were two left - the British and the French (more precisely, the French-Swiss).

        They didn’t quarrel with each other, but they weren’t really friendly - they competed sluggishly against the background of Rockefeller leadership.
        1. Ruslan
          +3
          13 June 2012 19: 48
          In 1980, there was a split in the British branch. And Jacob Rothschild was expelled from the family of Evelyn de Rothschild - with the prohibition of using the name "Rothschild" in the name of their firms.

          Opala was relaxed in 1988, and in 2004, when Evelyn transferred family business management affairs to a representative of the French branch, David de Rothschild, Jacob was fully rehabilitated.

          From this it follows that Jacob, in fact, is the “agent of influence” of the French Rothschilds among the British. That is why he was subjected to exile, restoring his rights only when the process of official unification of the two branches began. (This process ended in March-April 2012, when the French and British branches merged in Paris).

          From the mismatch between Jacob Rothschild’s 3 billion and the group’s total capital (which does not allow us to speak of the participation of the Rothschilds as a group), it also follows that, in full accordance with the right of the winner, the Rothschilds included only a tiny fraction of their assets in the combined company, and the Rockefellers were taken away many highly profitable creams (Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble, oil and gas concern Vallares, etc.).

          But it also follows from this that Rockefeller’s first person, David (the grandson of the founder of the dynasty), “accepted the surrender” - sent a third-rate Rothschild - not the first or even the second in the intra-group hierarchy, besides having been among the “own” outcasts for a long time.

          This is in itself a humiliation, but it was not limited to them. To hurt Rockefeller even harder and more demonstratively:

          - first, the deal was widely publicized, apparently, thus recording the fact of a request for a “truce” (which was not the case in 2008);

          - secondly, they included in the terms of the agreement the right of the parties only to joint executive decisions and functions that will be taken by the general management company (in other words, the Rockefellers are no longer entitled to dispose of their own companies at home, in the US and in their “office” nor friendly assets);

          - thirdly, even “tolerant” financial analysts (the ones that hang the public “noodles on the ears” about “uniting groups in dealing with the crisis”) recognize that the agreement leads to an expansion of the Rothschilds expansion in the US banking sector.

          And what does it mean?

          Of course, an impressive new step in revising the historical conditions for the sale of British assets in the US, delivered to 1940 by Roosevelt (that is, the Rockefellers) to his cousin Churchill (that is, the Rothschilds). This is about the same thing that the Germans did with the French in 1940, insisting on signing a humiliating for the French army truce in the same Compiegne forest and in the same headquarters car, where in November 1918, Field Marshal Foch accepted the actual surrender of the German command.

          In fairness, we note that this revision began back in the 1980s, from the redistribution of the oil market in the United States (when British royal oil company British Petroleum climbed with "both feet", and not one but the United States in a particularly humiliating with the Saudis).

          Does Rockefeller have a counterplay, and if so, which one?

          There is a game, but in the business sector it will be difficult to realize it - due to the fact that it is difficult to withdraw assets from a common company: the Rockefellers themselves can no longer solve this issue, but they Well allow. Not to try!

          Should their partners try to withdraw their assets?

          But will they risk a direct challenge to the Rothschilds - that is the question. Than playing such dangerous games is easier (and more profitable) to throw the Rockefellers, having agreed with the new owners.

          And here we come to the fact that the truly serious defensive lines of the global clan in distress are not in the economy, but in politics, more precisely in geopolitics.

          1. Elections in the United States. They will not only be presidential, since a significant part of the Senate and state governors will be subject to renewal in November 2012.

          If the Rockefellers manage to get the Republican majority not only in the House of Representatives (as now), but also in the Senate, you can try to drive past 23 December 2012 of the year - when, formally, according to the Federal Reserve Law, the term of the 99-year lease from the Fed Reserve Print machine for the production of dollars from the US state.

          Here, after all, what is the important nuance? When such joint steps are taken as the creation of the Fed on 99 years (in 1913 year) - and the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers did it together, always, in addition to the laws, tacitly "gentlemen's" agreements are concluded. Of course, it is possible to break them, but this will be “not comme il faut”, that is why they are so risky to be reputable only in extreme cases. We dare to assume that in this case such agreements were also concluded - and it was for 99 years. Their most probable meaning is that before this period expires, under no circumstances should you “tear off the blanket” and not make any sudden movements.

          That is, the hands of those and others will finally be untied only after 23 December 2012 of the year - then we will see “who is whoo” (as Mr. Gorbachev said).

          The Fed is now controlled not by the Rothschilds, but by the Rockefellers. Therefore, the Rothschilds can be profitable to bring it down, to move from dollar to gold (and yuan), creating the conditions for launching the process of “reformatting” North America with the US incorporating into the “North American” and further into the “Transatlantic” alliances.

          But the Rockefellers in their time (in 1927 year) realized what kind of mine in the form of the Fed they laid under the United States. And, possessing undivided control over the White House and Congress, they amended the Federal Reserve Law so as to deprive the printing press of the Fed not strictly at a certain time, but when Congress decides. (The Rothschilds, who apparently decided that by the same token tacit agreements were violated, responded to the Great Depression and the victory of Democrat Roosevelt over Republican Hoover, which, however, as we have already noted, turned out to be Pyrrhic).

          Thus, the mere preservation of Obama in the White House is necessary for the Rothschilds, but not sufficient to derail the dollar. Moreover, Obama is likely to be needed only at the last stage: to “skip” without vetoing Congress’s decision to revoke the right to rent a printing press from the Fed (which the Republican president would most likely use).

          But in order to adopt such a law and send it to Obama for signature, you need to have a majority in both houses of Congress. And if after the elections in November 2012 of the year it turns out to be from the Republicans (who are divided between the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds), it will be problematic to make a decision to revoke the lease.

          It is significant: those Republicans who, like Ron Paul, were quick to raise the issue of revoking the right to rent from the Fed already during the current presidential campaign, got off the electoral distance very quickly - this means that Rockefeller supporters now rule the republican camp .

          So we are waiting from November.

          The second "line of defense" of the Rockefellers - the XVIII CPC Congress (again November 2012).

          If the Chinese leadership, both before and after the congress, maintains a balance that ensures uninterrupted “two-stroke” change of power - first the General Secretary of the CPC Central Committee and the Chairman of the PRC, and then, after five “intermediate” years, the Chairman of the Central Military Council (CER) , the chances of success for the Rothschilds will remain a bit. For a “safe haven” suitable for the transition to the “golden yuan” for the time necessary for the “reformatting” of the West, balanced China cannot become - only unbalanced, with the dominant dominance of one of the inner-party groups and the harsh suppression of all the others (like this took place in the 1970's).
  22. Ruslan
    +3
    13 June 2012 19: 49
    Without reliable, one hundred percent guarantees in the form of a gold-yuan pair, supplemented in the political sphere by the strategic Sino-Japanese alliance, the Rothschilds will not collapse the dollar and the US - the risk of getting the situation out of control is excessively great, and then the deciding argument instead of money may become weapons.

    There will be a chance to lose everything at once, including life.

    The next line of defense of the Rockefellers (admittedly, after the elections in France, almost completely lost) is German Chancellor A. Merkel and, in general, the “axis” of the government coalition represented by the CDU-CSU bloc.

    At the summit of the European Union 23 in May, the new French President F. Hollande practically presented Merkel with an French-Dutch (in fact, Rothschild) ultimatum:

    - abandon the idea of ​​turning the EU into a political association;

    - put the euro in dependence with the help of "Eurobonds" - collective debt obligations of the eurozone (the idea of ​​Soros, apparently claiming control over them on behalf of the Rothschilds).

    Only one thing can save the situation: Merkel’s decisive rejection of this ultimatum and the acceleration of the crisis in the eurozone - up to its consolidation under German control, whoever would have had to “ask”. That is, the transformation of Germany into a single and only emission center of the euro.

    In this case, the situation would, in fact, return to the 1940 year: Europe under German control, only not tanks, but the printing press. A kind of "Fourth Reich".

    This is what Gerhard Schroeder spoke about in September 2011, when he called for the creation of the “United States of Europe” using the Merkel-Sarkozy axis (which has since been blown away by the “wind of change”).

    It is unlikely that Merkel will succeed in this: it is first necessary to consolidate German society, but it is fragmented and, basically, in opposition to the “party of power”. And the time before the election (September 2013) is too short.

    And the last frontier is Russia V.V. Putin's

    Having renewed the strategic alliance of Rosneft with the American Exxon-Mobil to 2011 (instead of British Petroleum), which was helped by the scandal in TNK-BP, the Russian leader gave a clear and unequivocal sign.

    It was understood and heard: that is why in January 2012 of the year, despite all the noisy reports of the State Department and the American embassy in support of street protests, in favor of V.V. Putin, as the future head of state, has expressed the patriarch of Russian politics, Academician EM. Primakov. A week later, such a significant figure as G. Kissinger appeared in Moscow.

    Interestingly: a day before the promulgation of the agreement between Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller, TNK-BP left M. Friedman, head of Alfa Group, a consultant to the International Council of Experts of the US Council on Foreign Relations (his 2009 conflict with the aforementioned business Partner Rothschild Deripaska).

    Before Friedman, the current head of BP left the British, Dudley, who in London is considered the main victim of the “conspiracy of the Russian oligarchs”, and then V. Vekselberg, etc.

    Two days later, British Petroleum itself withdrew from the TNK-BP project, leaving the comments of the British state information corporation BBC to the memory of their stay in Russia with biting sarcasm.

    What does this mean?

    That the Rockefellers did not reconcile with their defeat, consider it an intermediate stage of intergroup struggle and are ready to fight further.

    For this they need Russia. Moreover, a united, consolidated and strong Russia (without “orange” excesses): not by chance, even before the inauguration of V.V. Putin’s representatives Exxon-Mobil in his presence signed an agreement with Rosneft on oil production on the shelf of the Black and Kara Seas.

    United Shipbuilding Corporation and Russian Technologies are connected to the agreement. This means that the Rosneft-Exxon-Mobil alliance is far from being limited to oil issues.

    Appointment I.I. Sechin president of "Rosneft" in this situation - a step of strategic importance.

    The alignment of forces is now one-on-one repeats the end of the 1920s, when Stalin selected the Baku oil fields from the concession from the Nobels (Rothschild partners) and transferred them to the Rockefeller 50% concession in exchange for financial and technological support for Soviet industrialization.

    At each new stage History repeats itself!

    On the one hand, Russia has a unique chance: to play in the global “Big Game” on an equal footing with a partner (albeit temporary), who today is vitally (vitally!) Interested in our success. (What will happen tomorrow is another conversation: this is a policy in which, along with a strategy, there is a tactic).

    On the other hand, the realization of this chance will be in every way hampered by the Rothschild agents. (Already it prevents: not by chance, VV Putin was met with a custom protest sensation both in Berlin and in Paris).

    The question is how quickly and effectively the Russian leader will be able to suppress the “fifth column”, pushing forward the necessary transformations and making the new balance of forces irreversible.

    It is a matter of the survival of the country. For in the strategy of the Rothschilds of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to be dismembered, as Gorbachev had been striving for (and still is striving for that all)

    In conclusion, we are anticipating a legitimate question: what is necessary for a complete exit from these layouts and independent, sovereign development?

    Let's be honest: at this stage, it is necessary to resist and increase state power, consolidate society and get (how terrible it would be to anyone) state ideology. And not abstract (“for all good - against all bad”), but project-based. Able to show the country and the world the Russian vision and plan for building a fair world order, alternative to the current "world of money", which today "eat people" about the same way as the English sheep of the times of the industrial revolution "ate".

    In addition, the “pluralism” encouraged today does not form a system of value coordinates — a norm that, reflecting and fixing a civilizational idea at the household level, would allow to distinguish good from bad social behavior (politics) from asocial, etc.

    A new elite is urgently needed - national, not comprador.

    In the future, when these initial requirements are met, sooner or later there will be (should be) a question about leaving the enslaving conditions of our country's membership in the Basel club and the currency board mechanism it establishes - pegging the money supply to the amount of gold and foreign exchange reserves. That is, the transformation of the “Central” Bank, which is today an instrument of external control, into a “State” one, carrying out currency, including issuing, policies in national rather than globally oligarchic interests. (After all, having heard this, it is not by chance that the liberals invariably entertain with a heart-rending screech: a thief and a cap are burning!)

    Note: the central bank had neither the Russian Empire nor the USSR. It appeared only in the times of “developed democracy”. In them, he should remain as an integral attribute and symbol of the neocolonial “yoke” of the “golden horde” associated with this “democracy” (in its modern, literal, and not historical reading).

    The question is really serious: the United States on this path in the XIX century went through a civil war and as a result, after half a century, they still ended up in the networks of a global oligarchy.

    But this is already a somewhat different topic. All in order.
    MYSELF- I apologize for posting it here but it's worth it to read
    1. Kaa
      0
      14 June 2012 02: 07
      Ruslan certainly got everything. probably, it was necessary to lay out in the form of an article. The main thing is that a new industrialization takes place, rather than being pulled apart, and then everything will work out with you and with us, and better together
  23. svetlana4821
    0
    15 June 2012 03: 14
    I'm just shocked! I just entered my data (name, surname and date of birth) here [http://tinyurl.com/sngsearch] and my occupation, hobbies, place of residence, contacts knocked me out. I thought it was just a coincidence, but then I checked on my friends, the same garbage !!! How is this possible?