Warband. "Dogs-knights" on the roads of war

66
The Teutonic Order, the third in power and strength of the spiritual and knightly orders that emerged in Palestine in the era of the Crusades, has a bad reputation. He has no tragic, shrouded high "Gothic" mystic fame of the Knights Templar. There is no romantic halo of valiant hospitallers, who, being expelled from the Holy Land, glorified Rhodes and Malta, continuing to fight with Muslims at sea.

Not having achieved great success in the war with the Saracens, the Teutonic Order gained gloomy glory in Europe, and the word “Teuton” itself is often used now to designate a rough and stupid martinet. In general, the "knight dogs" - and the point. Why exactly did the Teutonic Order have such a fate?



Warband. "Dogs-knights" on the roads of war


Perhaps the fact is that in Europe this order introduced the methods of war characteristic of Palestine. Opponents of the Crusaders in the Middle East and North Africa were "infidels" - people of an alien culture, even outwardly different from Europeans. The Islamic world, unlike the same, disconnected and constantly conflicting, pagan tribes of the Baltic States, had great potential power, was on the rise and pursued an active expansionist policy. The war with the Muslims was considered the holy duty of every knight and every Christian Sovereign - and in this war all methods were good. The new opponents of the Teutonic Order were, of course, also “alien”, but they were on other “steps”. Orthodox were considered schismatics - “strange”, not “very correct”, but still Christians. They could try one way or another to "convince" to recognize the power of the popes, at least through union. To fight with them under this pretext was a “God-pleasing” deed, but it was not forbidden to enter into military-political alliances to fight Muslim Turkey or someone from its Christian neighbors. Pagans, of course, were an adversary against whom moral norms did not act. And to kill ten people in order to “persuade” one hundred others to be baptized (“voluntarily and without coercion”, of course) was considered quite normal and acceptable. However, even the pagans were “better” than their own heretics, who, having received the baptism of the “true faith,” allowed themselves to doubt the authority of the ignorant priest of the local church, the sanctity of hypocritical monks, the piety of the tyrant-bishop, and the infallibility of the dissolute Roman pope. They read the forbidden Bible for the laity and interpreted its texts in their own way. They asked questions that really did not want to answer. It seems that: how many hands and feet should be with the saints, if you collect all the bones, exhibited in the churches? If the forgiveness of sins can be bought for money, then for money can you let them go and the devil? And in general, how many dads do you have? Still two? Or is now the 1408 year and in Pisa have already chosen the third? How can you believe in the church if the church is not God, after all? And then suddenly they began to say that Christ and His apostles had neither property nor secular power. The heretics were not only worse than pagans, but even Muslims are much worse and more dangerous. They were supposed to be destroyed according to the principle: “It is better that ten righteous men perish than save one heretic.” And God - he will understand in heaven, "alien" his faithful servants sent him, or "their". Teutons did not fight with Muslims and heretics in Europe, only against the Orthodox, pagans and even Catholics. However, they did not restructure: they behaved and fought in the same way as with the Saracens in Palestine (especially at first), which was somewhat shocking not only opponents, but also some allies.

However, perhaps everything is much simpler: the Teutonic Order lost, and his history if they didn’t write, the winners significantly edited them. Who, everywhere and always, precisely themselves declare "warriors of Light."

And a certain Mr. A. Hitler, who loves to talk about “Teutonic rage” and “Teutonic onslaught on the East,” also did not add popularity to this order.

It all began in 1143, when the first German hospital appeared in Jerusalem, which received orders from the Pope of Rome to submit to the Hospital of St. John. In November, 1190, during the siege of Acre (III Crusade), the nameless merchants from Lübeck and Bremen founded a new field hospital for German soldiers. The Duke Friedrich of Swabian (the son of Friedrich Barbarossa) formed on his basis a spiritual order, at the head of which Chaplain Conrad was appointed. Already 6 February 1191, Pope Clement III approved the foundation of the new order, and in December 1196, another pope, Celestine III, approved it as a spiritual knight. This was an important event in the life of the Christian states of Palestine, entering the last century of its history. The masters of hospitallers and templar, many secular knights and clergymen attended the ceremony of reorganization of the order. Its official name now was: “The Order of the Brothers of the Hospital of St. Mary of the German House in Jerusalem” (Ordo domus Sanctae Mariae Teutonicorum in Jerusalem). From this time on, the order has its own army and military functions become essential for it. At the same time, the order was granted a privilege, freeing him from the power of the bishops and allowing him to choose his own master.



Pope Innocent III in the February 19 bullet 1199 defined the following tasks of the new order: the protection of German knights, the treatment of the sick, the struggle against the enemies of the Catholic Church. The motto of the order: "Help - Protect - Heal."

Unlike the Templars and the Hospitallers, who submitted only to the Pope, the Teutonic Order was also subject to the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire.


Coat of arms of the Teutonic Order


According to the statute of the order, its members were obliged to observe the vow of celibacy, unconditionally obey their elders and not have personal property. That is, they were actually prescribed a monastic way of life. In this regard, let us return to the famous Teutonic nickname - “Knight Dogs”: they are so called only in the territories of the former USSR republics and the reason for this is the incorrect translation into Russian of one of the works of Karl Marx, who used the noun “monk” in relation to Teutonic German language close to the word "dog". "Monk Knights" called them Karl Marx! Not dogs, nor dogs and dogs. But will anyone dissuade you now? And somehow it is not good - to drown monks in the lake. Here “dogs” is another thing altogether! Is not it?

But back to Palestine. The residence of the head of the order (grandmaster) became Akra. His deputies and closest assistants were the five gross-headers (the Great Lords), the main one being the Great Commander. The High Marshal was responsible for the training of troops and their management. The other three are the High Hospitaller, Quartermaster and Treasurer. Knight, appointed to manage one of the provinces, received the title of Land Commander. The commander of the garrison of the fortress was called Castellan. All these posts were elected.

A knight was accompanied by several servants of armor-bearers with marching horses — they did not participate in battles. The warhorse was used only during the battle, the rest of the horses were needed mainly as pack animals: during the march, the knights, like the rest of the warriors, walked. To mount a horse and put on armor was possible only on the orders of the commander.

As the name suggests (Teutonicorum - translated into Russian “German”), the members of the order came from Germany, initially they were divided into two classes: knights and clerics.


Priest of the Teutonic Order


A third class soon appeared: the serving brothers — some of them came from religious convictions, but many simply performed certain duties for a fee.

The most famous and recognizable symbol of the order - the black cross on a white cloak, was the emblem of the knights brothers. The remaining members of the order (including the Turkopoller - the commander of the mercenary detachments) wore gray cloaks.



Like its “elder brothers”, the Teutonic Order quickly acquired lands (Komturii) outside Palestine: in Livonia, Apulia, Austria, Germany, Greece, Armenia. This was all the more useful since the affairs of the Crusaders in the Holy Land were getting worse. As a result, without waiting for the final collapse, the Teutons, taking advantage of the invitation of Count Boppo von Wertheim, the main forces of the order relocated to Bavaria (the city of Eschenbach). But part of the "brothers" still remained in Palestine, in 1217-1221. they took part in the V Crusade - to Egypt.

In 1211, the Teutons were invited to Hungary — to defend Transylvania from the Polovtsy.


Fortress of the Teutonic Order in Transylvania (Rasnov)


But already in 1225, King Andras II, suspecting the Teutons in an attempt to create on the territory of Hungary their own, vassal to the Pope, the state, drove them out of the country.


Andras II, King of Hungary



4-th Grand Master of the Teutonic Order Hermann von Salz - a monument in front of the museum of Malbork Castle


It would seem that this ugly story should have been a lesson for other European rulers, but already in 1226, the city of Konrad Mazowiecki (Polish prince from the Piast dynasty) invited the Order to fight the pagan tribes of the Baltic states, first of all the Prussians.


Konrad Mazowiecki


He even gave them the Kulma (Chelmen) and Dobzhinsky (Dobrynska) lands with the right to expand their possessions at the expense of the conquered lands. The right to seize Prussian and Lithuanian lands in 1234 was confirmed by Pope Gregory IX, and later by the German emperors Frederick II and Ludwig IV. Frederick II granted the Grand Masters title and rights of the Elector. And in 1228, the Order begins the conquest of Prussia. But the headquarters of the Teutons is still in Palestine - in the castle of Montfort.


The ruins of the castle of Montfort


And in 1230, the first Teutonic castle (Neshawa) appears on Kulma land. Further, Velun, Kandau, Durben, Velau, Tilsit, Ragnit, Georgenburg, Marienwerder, Barga and Konigsberg were built. A total of 40 castles were built, some of them (Elbing, Königsberg, Kulm, Thorn) formed German cities that became members of the Hanseatic League.

Meanwhile, back in 1202, in the Baltics, “his own” appeared, the local knightly Order - the Brotherhood of Knights of Christ of Livonia, better known as the Order of the Sword.


Knight of the Order of the Sword


Mr Velikiy Novgorod didn’t like new neighbors trying to subjugate the tribes who paid tribute to Novgorod. As a result, already in 1203, Novgorod will organize the first campaign against the Sword. Total from 1203 to 1234. such campaigns Novgorod made 8. In 1234, the great victory over the Order was won by the father of Alexander Nevsky - Prince Yaroslav.

It seems it would be logical if the Novgorod bogatyr Vasily Buslaev had a fight with the swordmen. But, no, Vaska ignores them, on the contrary, he goes to Jerusalem himself and perishes along the way. In Russian epics, the swordmen have a different, much more eminent and “status” opponent. In one version of the epic "On the three trips of Ilya of Murom" there are such lines:

"Surrounded by Ilya Muromets
In the hoods black people -
Crow covers,
Hoodie long -
Know the monks is all al priests!
Persuade the knight
Throw Russian Orthodox law.
For treason
All promise sulu great,
And honor, and respect ... "


After the failure of the hero:

"Bashlyki undress here,
Hoodies are thrown off -
Not monks, black
Not priests dolgopoliki,
Latin warriors are standing -
Sword Giants. "


But one should not think that the Russians and the Swordsmen only fought among themselves. Sometimes, they acted as allies. So, in 1228, Pskov concluded an alliance with the Order against Novgorod encroaching on its independence - and the Novgorodians retreated.

In 1236, the swordtails made a rash decision to start a war against Lithuania. Knights from Saxony (“guests of the Order”) and 200 soldiers from Pskov came to their aid:

"He sent messengers to Russia then (Magister Falkvin), their help soon arrived."

("The Livonian Rhyming Chronicle.")

22 September 1236. Allies suffered a crushing defeat against the Lithuanians in the battle of Saul (Siauliai). The master of the Order of the Swordsmen, Falkin Schönke von Winterstern, Count Heinrich von Danenberg, Mr. Theodorich von Namburg and another 48 order knight were killed. Great losses suffered Saxons and Pskov. In the First Novgorod Chronicle it is reported that from 200 warriors sent by Pskov to the “Germans for help” “to the godless Lithuania” “came ten of them to their own houses”. After this defeat, the Brotherhood was on the verge of death, it was saved by its accession to the Teutonic Order, whose landmaster’s name, under the name of the Livonian Order, becomes. 54 Teutonic knights "changed registration", compensating for the losses suffered by the swordmen.

In 1242, the famous Battle of Lake Peipsi took place - already with the Livonian knights, and not with the swordsmen. Livonian allies were the Danes.


Frame from the film "Alexander Nevsky", director S. Eisenstein


“Ice Battle” is known to all, but the scale of this battle is traditionally exaggerated. A much larger and significant battle took place in February of 1268 under Rakovar (Estonian Rakvere). The chronicle states:
"Neither our fathers nor our grandfathers saw such a cruel Sich."


The combined Russian army of Pskov Prince Dovmont, Novgorod posadnik Michael and son of Alexander Nevsky Dmitry overturned the allied forces of the Livonian Order and the Danes and drove them 7 versts. The losses of the parties were really serious, numbered by thousands of professional soldiers, which by the standards of the XIII century is very noticeable.


Dovmont, a Lithuanian by birth, Prince of Pskov, who became a saint of the Russian Orthodox Church


But in general, in Europe, despite some defeats, the Order of the Order is going well. In 1244, the most important event in the history of the Order takes place - the Pope recognizes his state in Europe. In 1283, the Teutons complete the conquest of Prussia (Borussia) - despite the uprisings of 1242-1249 and 1260-1274. In 1308-1309. The Order takes possession of Eastern Pomerania and Danzig. In Palestine, at that time everything is very bad: in 1271, the Mamelukes seize Montfort, in 1291 - the Crusaders lose Acre, and the Teutonic Order transfers its headquarters to Venice. In the 1309 year, when the Order is completely comfortable in the Baltic States, the grandmaster will move to Marienburg - the residence of the great masters this castle will remain until 1466.


Marienburg (Malbork), modern photo


At the end of the XIII century, the Order came into conflict with the Archbishop of Riga, as a result of which he was even excommunicated in 1311. But then everything was decided by the world and the removal of the weaning in the next year, 1312. In 1330, the opposition of the Teutons and the Archbishop ended with the victory of the Order, who became the lord of Riga. At the same time there was an exchange of territories between the Teutonic Order and its Livonian Landmaister: In 1328, the Livonian Order handed over to the Teutonic Memel and its environs. And at 1346, the Teutons bought Northern Estonia from Denmark and, in turn, transferred it to the Livonian Order.

Meanwhile, at that time, a curious tradition appeared in Europe - “Prussian travels”: knights from different states, including those from the most distinguished aristocratic families, came to Prussia to take part in the war against pagan Lithuania. These "tourist trips to the war" became so popular that sometimes the Order only gave the "guests" guides and commander, giving them the opportunity to fight with the Lithuanians themselves. Grand Master Karl von Trier (who took office in 1311) began to pursue a peace-loving policy so outraged European chivalry that in 1317 he was removed from the position at the Chapter meeting. Even the intercession of the pope did not help.

One of the "guests" of the Teutonic Order was Henry Bolingbroke, Earl of Derby, son of the famous John Gaunt. 19 July 1390. He arrived in Danzig on his own ship with a detachment of 150 people, accompanied by 11 knights and 11 squires.

In the “Torun Annals” it says:
“At the same time (1390), a marshal with a great army stood at Vilna, and with him, Mr. Lancaster, an Englishman, who came with his people before St. Lawrence. Livonians and Vitovt came with their Sammaths. And at first they took the unfortified castle of Vilna and killed many, but they did not capture the fortified castle. ”


In 1392, Henry sailed to Prussia again, but there was no war, and therefore, accompanied by 50, he set off through Prague and Vienna to Venice. In 1399, John Gaunt died and King Richard II confiscated the family possessions of his family. Outraged, Henry returned to England, revolted and captured the king (August 19 1399). In the parliament that assembled on September 30, he declared his claims to the throne. His arguments were adorable:

First of all, high origin is an argument, frankly, not very, but it is so - on the seed.

Secondly, the right to conquer is serious, this is grown-up.

And finally, in the third - the need for reform. The magic phrase, having heard that the current presidents (and other heads of state) understand that the Anglo-Saxons need something very much in their country. And if they don’t give up this “something” immediately, they will be beaten (perhaps even with their feet). On the territory of England, magic seems to have worked already at the end of the 14th century. Richard II quickly abdicated the throne and was so kind that very soon (February 14 1400) died in the castle Pontekraft - at the age of 33 years. And our hero 13 in October 1399 was crowned as Henry IV, King of England. He became the founder of the Lancaster dynasty and rules until 1413.


Henry IV, King of England, one of the "guests" of the Teutonic Order


In 1343, the Order returned to Poland the occupied lands (with the exception of Pomorye - the Kalisz Treaty) and concentrated all its forces on the struggle against Lithuania. In total XIV century, the Teutons made about 70 major trips to Lithuania from Prussia and around 30 - from Livonia. And in 1360-1380. major trips to Lithuania were made annually. In 1362, the Order's army destroyed the Kaunas castle, in 1365, the Teutonic people first attacked Vilnius. The Lithuanians, in turn, in 1345-1377. made about 40 retaliatory campaigns. In 1386, the Grand Duke of Lithuania Jagiello adopted Catholicism and was proclaimed by the Polish king under the name of Vladislav II (the foundation of the Jagiellonian dynasty, which will rule in Poland until 1572). After the baptism of Lithuania, the Teutons lost formal grounds for attacks. But the reason for the war did not go away: the емemaitija and the western Aukshaytiya, which belonged to Lithuania, separated the possessions of the Teutonic Order from its Livonian landmaister (Livonian Order). And the Grand Duke of Lithuania Vitovt at that time had big problems: his rival, Prince Svidrigailo, could not calm down, and the Tatars were constantly worried about the south-eastern frontiers, and the Polish queen Jadwig suddenly demanded payments from the Lithuanian lands donated to her by Yagaila . The latter’s claims particularly angered the Lithuanians, who, at a specially assembled council, decided to inform the queen that, as honest and decent people, they can only wish her “better health and a good mood”. And all the rest - let him with her husband demands. Under these conditions, Vitovt was forced to conclude with the Order of the Salinsky Treaty (1398), according to which, in exchange for support, he ceded the Order of the Land to Nevezis. It was a territory with a very significant pagan influence, which Vitovt himself practically did not control. As a result, in 1399, the Teutonic Order even made an ally of Lithuania in the Battle of Vorskla (a rather strange alliance of Prince Vitovt, Khan Tokhtamysh and Teutons).


Battle of Vorskla


This battle was one of the largest and bloodiest in the XIV century, and ended with a heavy defeat for the Allies.

In 1401, the uprising of the Samogitians forced the Order to leave this province, after which its attacks on Lithuania were resumed. In 1403, Pope Boniface IX officially forbade the Teutons to fight with Lithuania. As a compromise in 1404, the Order received that same Samogitia under joint management with Poland and Lithuania (the rationing treaty). The idyll ended in 1409 with an uprising of the Samogitians dissatisfied with the Order of the Order, whom the Lithuanians came to their aid. Thus began the decisive war of Poland and the Lithuanian principality against the Teutonic Order, which culminated in the catastrophic defeat of the latter in the battle of Grunwald (Tanenberg).


Battle of Grunwald, engraving


The Allied Army was impressive: the troops of the Polish king Jagiello, the Grand Duke of Lithuania Vitovt, the “banner” from Smolensk, Polotsk, Galich, Kiev, the Czech army led by Jan ижižka, who was yet to become great during the Hussite Wars, and detachment of the Tatar cavalry (about 3 000 people). Including auxiliary troops and wagon train, the number of this army reached 100 thousands of people. On the right flank stood Russian-Lithuanian troops and Tatars (40 khorugvy) under the command of Vitovt. On the left - the Poles, commanded by the commander Zyndram (50 banners). Artillery was distributed around the front. Part of the infantry units covered transports. To raise the morale of the army, before the start of the battle, King Jagiello knighted several dozen people before the formation.

The troops of the Teutonic Order consisted of representatives of 22 countries of Western Europe (51 "flag") and numbered about 85 thousands of people. The number of members of the Order is historians estimate in 11 thousands of people, 4 thousands of them were crossbowmen. The commander in chief was Master Ulrich von Jöngingen.


26 Magister of the Teutonic Order Ulrich von Jungingen


The artillery Ulrich von Jungingen positioned ahead of the battle formations, the bulk of the infantry was stationed in a wagenburg (a fortification of carts) - behind the deployed positions of heavy cavalry and artillery of the order.

15 July 1410. The army of opponents rose between the villages of Tannenberg and Grunwald. The Grand Master sent to Yagailo and Vitovt heralds with a provocative message, which said:
“Serene King! The Grand Master of Prussia Ulrich sends two swords to you and your brother as encouragement for the upcoming battle, so that you with them and with your army immediately and with more courage than you show, enter the battle and do not hide longer, dragging out the battle and sitting in the woods and the grove. If you think the field is narrow and narrow for the deployment of your system, then the Prussia master Ulrich ... is ready to retreat, as much as you want, from the flat field occupied by his army. "


The Crusaders, indeed, moved back. According to the views of those years, it was a challenge bordering on an insult. And the allies began the battle. The first moved troops Vitovt. This is where the discrepancies begin: some historians claim that the attack of Vitovt’s light cavalry and Tatar cavalry was initially successful: they allegedly managed to chop up the order artillerymen. The Polish chronicler Dlugosh claims the opposite: the cavalry attacking the Teutons fell into pre-arranged traps (“holes covered with earth so that people and horses would fall in them”). During this attack, Podolsky Prince Ivan Zhedevid died, "and many more people suffered great damage from those pits." After that, detachments of “guests” moved against the Lithuanians - knights of other countries who wished to fight with the “pagans”. About an hour later, the Allied left wing began to "retreat and finally fled ... The enemies chopped up and captured the fleeing, chasing them many miles away ... But the runners were seized with such fear that most of them stopped their flight, only reaching Lithuania "(Dlugosh). The Tatar cavalry also fled. Many modern historians consider this evidence of Dlugosh as too categorical. Knightly cavalry could not develop success, as it fell into swampy rugged terrain. Low appreciating the actions of the Lithuanian army as a whole, Dlugosh opposes them the actions of three Smolensk regiments:
"Although under one banner they were brutally hacked and their banner trampled into the ground, but in the other two detachments they emerged victorious, fighting with the greatest courage, as befitted men and knights, and finally united with the Polish troops."


This was of great importance for the course of the whole battle, since the Smolensk regiments adjoined the Polish army on the right, and, holding the position, did not allow the knightly cavalry to strike the flank.

Only now the Teutons and the Prussian militia engaged in battle with the Poles, striking them "from a higher place" (Dlugosh). Success, it seemed, accompanied the soldiers of the Order, they even managed to seize the royal banner. At that moment, already confident of victory, the grand master threw the last reserves into battle, but the reserve units were used by the allies, moreover, part of the Vitovt army suddenly returned to the battlefield. And now the decisive role played a numerical advantage. Army of the Order managed to bypass from the left flank and surround. In the last phase of the battle, the great master, the great commander, the great marshal and the 600 knights were killed. Of the commanders, only one survived - not taking part in the battle. About 15 000 people were taken prisoner. Carts, artillery, battle flags of the crusaders were captured (51 was sent to Krakow, the rest - to Vilnius).


Jan Matejko, Battle of Grunwald. This picture was blacklisted by the leadership of the Third Reich and was to be destroyed.


I The Treaty of Toruń (1411) was rather mild towards the losing side, but the Teutons were forced to return to Lithuania Samogitia and Zanemanye. The Teutonic Order, which at some point was in the position of the strongest in Europe (the Order of the Templars was treacherously crushed and banned, and the hospitallers did not have such a resource base as the Teutons, who collected taxes from numerous lands and even monopolized the trade in amber ) from this blow has not recovered. The Teutons lost the strategic initiative, and now they could only defend themselves, trying to defend their possessions. In 1429, the Order still helps Hungary repel the attack of the Turks. But the subsequent unsuccessful wars with Lithuania (1414, 1422), with Poland and the Czech Republic (1431-1433) have aggravated the crisis of the Order.

In 1440, the Order of Prussian Union was formed in opposition to the Order - the organization of secular knights and citizens. In February 1454, this alliance rebelled and announced that all Prussian lands would henceforth be under the auspices of the Polish king Casimir. The thirteen-year war of the Order with Poland, which followed then, ended in another defeat of the Teutons. Now the Order has lost Eastern Pomerania and Danzig, Kulma land, Marienburg, Elbing, Warmia, which were ceded to Poland. From the lost forever Marienburg (which became Polish Malbork) the capital was moved to Konigsberg. This defeat could be fatal if the Lithuanians also hit the Order, but for some reason they remained neutral. The authority of the Teutonians is steadily declining, and in 1452, the Order loses its sole authority over Riga - now it was forced to share it with the archbishop. And in 1466, the autonomy of the Livonian Order is granted. In 1470, the master Heinrich von Richtenberg was forced to take a vassal oath to the King of Poland. Attempt to regain independence in 1521-1522. not a success.

In 1502, the army of the Order won the last victory over the Russian army, but in 1503, the war ended in favor of Moscow. And in 1525, an event occurred that shook the whole of Europe: the grandmaster of the Catholic Order, Albrecht Hohenzollern, and part of the knights accepted Lutheranism. The Teutonic Order was abolished, its territory was declared the hereditary principality of Prussia, vassal, in relation to Poland. From the hands of the Polish king Sigismund, Albrecht received the title of duke. After that, he married the Danish princess Dorothea.


Albrecht Hohenzollern, the last Master of the Teutonic Order, who became the first Duke of Prussia


But some of the knights remained faithful to the old faith, in 1527 they chose a new grandmaster - Walter von Kronberg. The emperor of the Holy Roman Empire approved this assignment, the Teutonic knights who left Prussia fought against Lutherans in religious wars. In 1809, the Teutonic Order was dissolved by Napoleon Bonaparte, but in 1840 it was again revived in Austria.

As for the Livonian Order, it was abolished during the Livonian War. His last master, Gothard Kettler, followed the example of the Teutonic grandmaster: in 1561, he accepted Lutheranism and became the first Duke of Courland.


Gotthard Kettler, the last master of the Livonian Order, who became the first duke of Courland


The Duchess of Courland was the niece of Peter I - Anna Ioannovna, who ascended to the Russian throne in 1730. And the last duke of Courland was Peter Biron - the son of her favorite, Ernst Johann Biron.


Peter Biron, the last duke of Courland


28 March 1795. He was called to St. Petersburg, where he signed a renunciation of the duchy. The annual pension in 100 of thousands of thalers (50 of thousands of chervonets) and 500 of 000 of chervonets as a payment for estates in Kurland became a compensation. He spent the rest of his life in Germany.

In 1701, the great Elector of Brandenburg and the Duke of Prussia, Friedrich Wilhelm, proclaimed himself to be still “king in Prussia” - the fact is, the western part of Prussia then still belonged to Poland. In 1722, the city of Frederick II, during the first partition of Poland, annexed these lands to his state and became the “king of Prussia”. In 1871, the last Prussian king, Wilhelm I Hohenzollern, became the first emperor of the 2nd German Reich.


King of Prussia Wilhelm I Hohenzollern, who became the first emperor of the 2nd German Reich


The leaders of the Third Reich in 1933 declared themselves to be "spiritual heirs" of the Teutonic Order. After the defeat in World War II unleashed by them, these “heirs” ceased to exist.

But purely formally, the Teutonic Order still exists on the territory of Austria today. True, only a loud name remains of him: the head is now not the great master, but the abbot-Hochmeister, and the order in the castrated order of the winners is not militant, the knights are always ready for battle, but almost only women (sisters) working in hospitals Austria and Germany.
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    21 January 2019 06: 08
    Thank you for the interesting article. Moreover, this story directly concerns our compatriots in Novgorod, Pskov and Smolyan.
    1. 0
      21 January 2019 09: 15
      Quote: 210ox
      ... this story directly concerns our compatriots-Novgorodians, Pskov and Smolyan.

      These inhuman people brought much grief to the people of the Earth. Their atrocities will not be forgotten.

      1. +7
        21 January 2019 10: 47
        Quote: Boris55
        These inhuman people brought much grief to the people of the Earth.

        Sorry, but here it’s worth specifying - in this case, the SLAVES and the Baltic states. And so for another part of the population they are HEROES and many with pleasure and pride lead their family tree from the knights of this order.
        1. -3
          21 January 2019 11: 57
          Quote: svp67
          Sorry, but here it’s worth specifying - in this case, the SLAVES and the Baltic states.

          They planted a new concept of living arrangements. Spent violent globalization, and not only among the Slavs and the Baltic states, but around the world. Remember, at least the Indians of North America, the natives of Australia, etc. They destroyed the local elite and took their places, turning the natives into slaves.

          "... The Nazi SS army is an abbreviated name for the" Knights of the Holy See. "This Catholic military order was first formed in 1933 on the basis of the Jesuit order. The SS was created after the signing of the concordat of the" sacred "Reich, in particular through the application of Articles 1,12,15,21 , 33 and XNUMX with clause (c) "secret attachment" from the concordat between Germany and the Vatican. The SS was perhaps one of the most sinister organizations that ever existed on Earth ... "

          Quote: svp67
          ... for another part of the population they are HEROES ...

          These are not our heroes. For us they are enemies.
          1. +2
            21 January 2019 16: 45
            Quote: Boris55
            These are not our heroes. For us they are enemies.

            Not yours, more precisely ...
            1. 0
              21 January 2019 19: 54
              Quote: svp67
              Not yours, more precisely ...

              "Knights of the Holy See" - SS, will never be my heroes!
              1. +3
                21 January 2019 19: 58
                Quote: Boris55
                "Knights of the Holy See" - SS, will never be my heroes!

                It is commendable, but the conversation in this article was about the "Teutonic Order", about its history ...
                1. -1
                  21 January 2019 20: 02
                  Quote: svp67
                  It is commendable, but the conversation in this article was about the "Teutonic Order", about its history ...

                  Who cares? In the title? These great-grandchildren of those Teutons destroyed the order of 20 millions of civilians of the USSR in the Second World War.
          2. +2
            22 January 2019 10: 02
            Quote: Boris55
            They planted a new concept of living arrangements. Spent violent globalization, and not only among the Slavs and the Baltic states, but around the world. Remember at least the Indians of North America, the natives of Australia, etc.

            Yes, what nonsense is that. My friend, where do you get such a backyard grass then? "Sign" the Teutonic knights for the destruction of even the abrigines of Australia, perhaps no one has thought of yet, only you. laughing
            1. 0
              22 January 2019 11: 51
              Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
              Yes, what nonsense is that.

              Over two thousand years, they have changed their appearance and their names many times. Unchanged remains their master - the Vatican and their hatred of us. hi
    2. +2
      21 January 2019 11: 04
      Quote: 210ox
      Moreover, this story directly concerns our compatriots-Novgorodians, Pskovs and Smolyans.

      As well as part of the population living now in the Kaliningrad region ...
      "Knight dogs": they are called that way only on the territory of the republics of the former USSR and the reason for this is incorrect translation into Russian
      But as accurately and accurately
      1. +2
        22 January 2019 14: 18
        People moved to the Kaliningrad region from the USSR. Before the Second World War, the Germans lived there, in East Prussia.
  2. +3
    21 January 2019 06: 11
    In the Battle of Grunwald, Eastern Europe gave Western Lyuli)). Cool
    1. +7
      21 January 2019 10: 55
      Quote: Krasnodar
      In the Battle of Grunwald, Eastern Europe gave Western Lyuli)). Cool

      You are a happy person, you learned something new for yourself, you used to talk about this battle at school and made films ... Moreover, each side called this battle in its own way ...
      Lithuanians, for example, the battle of альalgiris.
      1. +2
        21 January 2019 11: 08
        I taught this at school, I just forgot for a long time))))
        Dynamo or CSKA Zalgiris, not? Was there such a team in the USSR?
        1. +2
          21 January 2019 11: 10
          Quote: Krasnodar
          Was there such a team in the USSR?

          It was and not for nothing called
          1. +1
            21 January 2019 11: 12
            CSKA or Dynamo?
            1. 0
              21 January 2019 11: 16
              Quote: Krasnodar
              CSKA or Dynamo?

              "Zalgiris" - Lithuanian national basketball team
              1. +2
                21 January 2019 11: 27
                Ah, ok))
                It was a good team, by the way.
                1. +2
                  21 January 2019 11: 54
                  The basketball club is still here! There is to this day!
                  1. +1
                    21 January 2019 11: 56
                    Did not know ))). When was Europe last taken? On the continent of CSKA, Makabi and Greeks, it seems, they rule ..
                    1. +1
                      21 January 2019 12: 09
                      Perhaps the guys from the "Green Forest" also rule (Literally translated into Russian, the word "Zalgiris" means "green forest." 1410) rarely raise their hands and always try to play to the end. In the 2017-2018 Euroleague season, they were in 6th place. Now they are in 11th place. At 12 Panathinaikos.
                      Interesting - how does Maccabi's location relate to the European continent?
                      1. +2
                        21 January 2019 19: 19
                        Quote: hohol95
                        How is Maccabi's location related to the European continent?
                        Well, where else are they (s))))) (What are the men talking about)

                        .... last season, the average attendance of Zalgiris at Euroleague matches was 13560 people, this year - 14732.
                        Tickets for top matches are sorted out in advance. For example, a full house at the January game with CSKA was provided for a month.
                        Interestingly, the attendance of the Euroleague games in Kaunas is higher than that of some NBA clubs.
                        This year, Zalgiris has a record budget for the club (and still one of the smallest in the Euroleague) - 10,7 million euros. Of these, the club beats 8,1 million by its own efforts. source sports.ru
                        ... our clubs would
                      2. +4
                        21 January 2019 20: 07
                        Quote: hohol95
                        The name is given in honor of the victory of the Lithuanians, Belarusians and Poles over the Teutonic Order at the Battle of Grunwald

                        Belarusians? .. I am tormented by vague doubts :)
                      3. +2
                        21 January 2019 22: 22
                        Belarusians? .. I am tormented by vague doubts :)

                        So that they do not torment you, make changes to the article about "Zalgiris" in WikiWiki!
                        And you will sleep peacefully!
                      4. +5
                        22 January 2019 10: 05
                        Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
                        Belarusians? .. I am tormented by vague doubts :)

                        Most of the Lithuanian "banners" of the anti-Order troops were troops from the territory of the former Kievan Rus, which included modern western Russia and Belarus. So nothing strange, but there were also "Belarusian" banners, and even three "Russian" ones.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                      6. +1
                        22 January 2019 09: 09
                        Quote: hohol95
                        Perhaps the guys from the "Green Forest" also rule (Literally translated into Russian, the word "Zalgiris" means "green forest." 1410) rarely raise their hands and always try to play to the end. In the 2017-2018 Euroleague season, they were in 6th place. Now they are in 11th place. At 12 Panathinaikos.
                        Interesting - how does Maccabi's location relate to the European continent?

                        He stands for Europe, because most Muslim countries in Asia have traditionally refused with them
                2. +1
                  22 January 2019 00: 00
                  The famous USSR national basketball team (champions of Seoul) is the main backbone of the Lithuanians, Жalgiris ’players, Marchulionis was from another club. And so, not names, but a song - Khomichus, Kurtinaitis, Sabonis.
              2. +1
                27 January 2019 01: 11
                Quote: svp67
                "Zalgiris" - Lithuanian national basketball team

                And in the 80s, and football "Zalgiris" pulled up. Bronze of the USSR-87 championship, and in the same year
                "Zalgiris" won the Universiade under the flag of the USSR student team.
  3. +6
    21 January 2019 07: 58
    Very good material, but why does the respected author still not listen to the advice already given to him? Captions must be UNDER ALL pictures. It is not enough to indicate "medieval engraving". And so it is clear that it is not watercolor. It is desirable to indicate WHERE it is, where it is and in what edition. Using color (or at least some) illustrations by artists, you should indicate who the author is. It is necessary! For example, there is a picture under which it is written "Battle on Vorskla". And it is necessary to write - "Battle on Vorskla", Fig. V. Gorelika, Tseikhgauz magazine No. ... p. This is not a trifle. This speaks of the author's approach to work and his respect for his audience. There is a saying, "who did, but did not finish, did nothing." I would like to express the hope that in the future all the works of the distinguished author will be deprived of these annoying "little things".
  4. +1
    21 January 2019 08: 28
    The feeling that the article is made of two different parts, different in style and tasks to be solved. First stupid propaganda, then a normal historical review.
  5. +8
    21 January 2019 08: 36
    Forgive me, dear author, but I will add a few comments to his generally very solid material.

    Not having achieved much success in the war against the Saracens, the Teutonic Order gained gloomy fame in Europe

    Did not achieve great success? Only Islamic sultans and emirs did not know about this, right up to the general crisis of Christian Overseas in the 1270-1290 years. Much more then, with their small numbers. Sultan Beybars especially, although he was terribly menacing, but he repeatedly and repeatedly broke his teeth against the Teutonic citadels in the Levant.

    In general, the role of "Palestinian affairs" in the history of the Teutonic Order is greatly underestimated; in fact, until 1271, before the fall of Montfort, the main center of the order, where significant archives and the "field treasury" were kept, was this particular castle.

    Moreover, until the end of the 13th century, the "mission in the East" among the orders was considered MUCH more honorable and more consistent with the knightly path than the "mission in Prussia and Lithuania".

    Well, the last time the Teutonic brothers participated in the battle against the Saracens - in the defense of Acre, the penultimate capital of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, in the 1291 year, among other military contingents, traditionally famous for their staunchness and valor (they did not leave their positions during the evacuation of the garrison and residents and almost without exception died covering the withdrawal, like many other units of other orders).

    Quote: Ryzhov V.A.
    The Orthodox were considered schismatics - “strange”, not “quite right”, but still Christians. They could be tried in one way or another to “convince” to recognize the authority of the popes, at least through a union. To fight with them under this pretext was a “godly” affair, but it was not forbidden to enter into military-political alliances to fight Muslim Turkey or with one of the Christian neighbors.
    We, for obvious reasons, tried not to say that the number of joint operations of the Teutons and Livonians with the troops of the Orthodox principalities against the pagan tribes of Lithuania, etc. there was more number of mutual conflicts between orders and Russian princes.

    Quote: Ryzhov V.A.
    If the forgiveness of sins can be bought for money, then for the money can you let them go to the devil?
    Almost a century remained from the moment of the Battle of Grunwald — the decline of the order — until the appearance of indulgences. I’m not sure that this heretical type of argument is appropriate here.
    1. +4
      21 January 2019 09: 00
      I saw this Montfort - not far from the Golan Heights, by the way.
      1. +5
        22 January 2019 10: 08
        Quote: Krasnodar
        I saw this Montfort - not far from the Golan Heights, by the way

        Unfortunately, in the course of my voyages to Eretz Yisrael and other countries of the Middle East, I did not get directly to Montfort, and so - the citadel is really serious and at dominant heights.

        By the way, which is typical, many crusader castles in the same Israel and Syria are located in areas closed to visitors, where military information structure is still located (the tactical configuration of the relief was that in the Middle Ages, which today has not been canceled bully ).
        1. +1
          22 January 2019 10: 25
          Montfort is open to visitors, there’s just nothing to see there. A couple of ruin sites with small bridges between them.
    2. +5
      21 January 2019 09: 25
      Good afternoon, colleague.
      Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
      We, for obvious reasons, tried not to say that the number of joint operations of the Teutons and Livonians with the troops of the Orthodox principalities against the pagan tribes of Lithuania, etc. there was more number of mutual conflicts between orders and Russian princes.

      But from this place in more detail, please. I mean about "joint" operations. I heard about the joint operations of the Russians with Lithuania (as if there were no other pagans in the zone of contact between the Orthodox and Catholics) against the Germans. But on the contrary, with the Germans against Lithuania, somehow, apart from the glorious company of 1236, nothing comes to mind.
      It seems to me that either you incorrectly put it, or you possess completely secret, exclusive information, which deserves, probably, complete trust. It would be interesting to get acquainted with its sources.
      1. +4
        21 January 2019 10: 50
        Quote: Trilobite Master
        About the joint operations of Russians with Lithuania (as it were, there were no other pagans in the contact zone between the Orthodox and Catholics)
        Wait, and the Estonians, the Zhmudins ... who were they?
        1. +4
          21 January 2019 13: 23
          Quote: svp67
          Wait, and the Estonians, the Zhmudins ... who were they?

          Persuaded.
          Esty, zhmudiny, Yatvägi, Latgals, Livs, Zemgals, Aukshayty - who else have you forgotten? smile
          Let's be easier - Chud and Lithuania. About chud, I confess, I really forgot to mention, but this does not change the essence of my comment.
      2. +2
        22 January 2019 10: 14
        Yes, everything is simple - I read in one book about the Teutonic Order, that the same St. Alexander Nevsky (I am writing from memory) has about 10-12 campaigns against Lithuanian pagans, of which approximately 5-6 coincide chronologically with campaigns of the order crusaders against the same Lithuanians, which cannot be a coincidence, and so on.

        In addition, the Russian princes in the 13th century acted in the Baltic region (and not only, for example, in the same Volga region - waging a war against the pagans from the Finnish tribes of the Volga region and the Saracens of the Volga Bulgaria) as the same crusaders, only Orthodox, and the goal was to convert to Orthodoxy of local pagans, and before the campaign, prayers were served, prayers were sung, churches were erected on the site of successful victories, etc., in general, exactly like the orders, only "side view".

        And about the cruelties of all at that cruel time it’s just better not to talk, everyone was very good, all the same the Middle Ages ...
        1. +3
          22 January 2019 11: 06
          Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
          the same St. Alexander Nevsky (I am writing from memory) about 10-12 campaigns against Lithuanian pagans, about 5-6 of which coincide chronologically with campaigns of the Order of the Crusaders against the same Lithuanians, which cannot be a coincidence, and so on .

          Hiking Nevsky documented and studied. Foreign with his own participation - two, as I recall. One against the Germans in 1242, the other against him in 1257, in my opinion. Campaigns against Lithuania - either chases or interceptions of detachments returning from raids on Russia, all on its territory. Actually, on the territory of the Lithuanian tribes, the Russians, unlike the Germans, did not go, except perhaps Daniel Galitsky for Yatvyagov ...
          The campaigns of the Russian princes against the pagans can resemble the crusades only externally and with the most superficial examination. From the similarity of only prayers before departure.
          Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
          the aim was to convert local pagans to Orthodoxy

          No one has ever set such a goal. Vigilantes can not draw anyone, he can only force. And there were no priests such that we were trained to convert, appeared only in the second half of the 14th century. already at the time of Sergius of Radonezh and later. The purpose of the Russian campaigns in the lands of the pagans were exclusively the collection of tribute or robbery. There were no centralized sermons, no missionaries, often, there was not even an attempt to establish his administration. They came, got a tribute to the list, left. They did not get it - they hung them all, took away what was needed and, again, left. Exactly. No sermons and, especially, violent appeals.
          Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
          on the site of successful victories were put church
          Only in its controlled area.
          Cruelty is an integral part of life at the time.
          But the Germans used cruelty as a political tool. For them, it was not the excesses of the men heated by the war, as was usually the case, but a conscious, deliberate policy implemented with German composure and pedantry.
          1. +1
            22 January 2019 11: 22
            Quote: Trilobite Master
            Foreign with his own participation - two, as I recall. One against the Germans in 1242, the other against emi in 1257, in my opinion. Campaigns against Lithuania are either chases or intercepts of detachments returning from raids on Russia, all on its territory.

            The topic is interesting, it would be possible to get in more with the help of German sources, but there is sorely no time ...

            Quote: Trilobite Master
            The campaigns of the Russian princes against the pagans can resemble the crusades only externally and with the most superficial examination. From the similarity of only prayers before departure.
            Well, I don’t know, in fact, according to the texts of the annals - one on one with the crusaders’s campaigns from Europe - the same campaigns of Vladimir Monomakh against the Polovtsy, he specially set them up precisely as the Crusade, - especially since the era is the same (about the participation of the Russians units in the battles in Overseas on the side of the Crusaders, I generally hold back).

            You see, what’s the matter, people of the 12-13 centuries had a different worldview than most of our compatriots brought up on the stamps of the Soviet era ...

            Quote: Trilobite Master
            No one has ever set such a goal. The warrior can not turn anyone, he can only force.
            ??? So for this they took priests. Read about the Christianization of even the Slavic tribes of Zalessky Russia, not to mention the Finnish tribes of the Volga region. There are revolts of the Magi in response to missionary work, and armed Christian response mission, etc.

            An important point - only the Novgorod oligarchic republic did not seek pagan conversion (for obvious reasons, the merchants did not care for faith, the main thing was to have a raw materials and sales market). Most of the centralized principalities of the period of Kievan Rus pursued precisely the policy of Christianization.

            After the invasion of the Mongols, the situation changed - and as soon as the relatively Russian lands recovered from the invasion, a new wave of Christianization began to take place in 14-15, and mainly by peaceful means (after all, there were not enough forces and any sending of military units had to be coordinated with the Horde).

            Quote: Trilobite Master
            But there were no priests who were trained to convert, they appeared only in the second half of the 14th century. already at the time of Sergius of Radonezh and later.
            wassat Who baptized Russia, huh? after all, from Novgorod and Ladoga to Kiev and Uzhgorod!

            Dear Michael, you are clearly confusing a peace mission accomplished by preaching and a mission backed up by military force. The first is the best way, giving converts of the "best quality", but laborious, slow and requiring great sacrifice and asceticism from Christian priests (and this was the case both in Europe and here on the Russian Plain). The second, simpler, was often used after the "peace mission" had been going on for too long or had failed to produce results.
            1. +3
              22 January 2019 11: 46
              Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
              Dear Michael, you are clearly confusing the peaceful mission, accomplished by preaching, and the mission, supported by military force.

              That's the point, no. And an analysis of historical events shows clearly that the pragmatic Catholic part of Europe just preferred the second method of preaching, as opposed to its Orthodox part. The rest of your last paragraph agrees one hundred percent.
              As for the baptism of Russia, the Greeks did it, or rather the Romans, no matter what nationality they were. Later, their cadres appeared, trained, again in Constantinople or on Mount Athos. But to the extreme they were few, the Greek church did not have a large corps of missionaries, specially trained to preach from non-Vlachs. And the Catholics were. And the Muslims, too. Therefore, where Orthodoxy was confronted with Catholicism or Islam, the latter invariably won the victory, if from the beginning Orthodoxy did not have a completely clear advantage. Finland, the Baltic States, Lithuania, part of Belarus, Volyn, Galicia were rejected from Orthodoxy by Catholics, as well as the Middle Volga region, and partly by the Caucasus - by Muslims. The mental battle for the Golden Horde Russia lost to the East.
              Had everything been as you imagine it - the crusades of Russians, etc., we would not have experienced such weak and invariant defeats on the religious front.
              I have a couple of thoughts about this, if I’m ready, I’ll try to publish here.
              1. 0
                26 January 2019 22: 36
                Quote: Trilobite Master
                As for the baptism of Russia, the Greeks did it, or rather the Romans, whatever nationality they were. Later their cadres appeared, trained, again in Constantinople or on Mount Athos.
                Dear Mikhail, well, it’s not necessary to cut it under the root! laughing A simple fact - even without taking the Gothic diocese, where Orthodoxy existed since Antiquity, let us take at least the Dnieper region - Orthodoxy has been known there since at least ... 860 years (not to mention the even earlier campaigns of Prince Bravlin). Yes, yes, the Orthodox Church on these lands has a much older history than 988. And baptism was carried out not only by the Roman priesthood, but also by "local cadres".

                Quote: Trilobite Master
                But there were very few of them, the Greek church did not have a large corps of missionaries specially trained in how to preach from the neo-voice. And the Catholics had. And the Muslims too.
                Again, I ask you to explore more the history of Orthodoxy. How is it that if Orthodox missionaries reached Sri Lanka, Korea, and the like already in the Early Middle Ages? ? I’m silent about Europe ...

                Quote: Trilobite Master
                Finland, the Baltic states, Lithuania, part of Belarus, Volyn, Galicia were torn away from Orthodoxy by Catholics
                If the Baltic states almost initially became Catholic, then for Lithuania-Belarus-Volyn-Galicia (which entered the single Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Russia) the struggle went on, and up to the 14 century, and even later.

                Quote: Trilobite Master
                as well as the Middle Volga, partly, the Caucasus - by Muslims.
                Again, not quite like that. Islam appeared in the Volga region and in the Caucasus a long time ago (in the Volga region, in the Volga Bulgaria - so in general BEFORE Orthodox Christianity came to these lands). There was no rejection as such here. Rather, Russia tried from 12 to 16 centuries to conquer and Christianize these territories. The Caucasus is a different story.

                Quote: Trilobite Master
                Russia lost the mental battle for the Golden Horde to the East.

                Rather, the confrontation between diplomats and murderers. If Sartak had lived longer, and if Aleksanr Nevsky had not been poisoned in the Horde, then everything could have been different at all ... And the yoke would have ended already at the beginning of the 14 century ...
  6. +8
    21 January 2019 10: 47
    The article is interesting, although, of course, it was written at a gallop across Europe. But this is exclusively, as I understand it, from the desire to "embrace the immensity." Nevertheless, unconditional thanks to the author.
    A few comments.
    So, in 1228, Pskov concluded an alliance with the Order against Novgorod encroaching on its independence - and the Novgorodians retreated.

    Not exactly. Pskov made an alliance with Riga, and not with the Order - they should be distinguished, they are different political forces, although they are close.
    As a result, already in 1203, Novgorod will organize the first campaign against the Sword.

    Not Novgorod, and Polotsk and not against the Sword, and against Riga. In 1203, the Catholics were not yet in contact with Novgorod. The first campaign of Novgorod against the Order, can be dated 1212, and then conditionally.
    Total from 1203 to 1234. such campaigns Novgorod made 8.

    Even if we replace the "Novgorodians" with "Russian princes" and the "sword-bearers" with "crusaders" (not all crusaders were members of the Order), even then there were fewer "campaigns".
    1203 - an unsuccessful campaign of Vladimir Polotsky in Riga.
    1212 - Mstislav Udatny campaign to Estonia. This campaign can be considered directed against the Order only conditionally. He did not affect the areas already conquered by the Crusaders. His goal was to consolidate the influence of Novgorod in the areas on which the Germans began to aim, that is, to limit the expansionist aspirations of the Order.
    1217 - campaign of Vladimir Pskov on Bear Head (Odenpe). It was also directed against the Estonians, but ended in a clash with the Germans, who had come to the aid.
    1222 - the siege of Wenden (the capital of the Sword) Vsevolod Yuryevich. The first and only campaign during the period under review was actually the Novgorodians themselves against the Order itself.
    1223 - siege of Revel Yaroslav Vsevolodovich. The campaign was planned against the Order, but in fact went against the Danes.
    1234 - campaign of Yaroslav Vsevolodovich against the Bishop of Dorpat, but not against the Order in any way.
    A total of six Russian campaigns against the Crusaders in general, and only one campaign of Novgorod proper against the Order itself.
    In 1234, the great victory over the Order was won by the father of Alexander Nevsky - Prince Yaroslav.
    Not above the Order, but above the crusaders of the Dorpat bishop and the clan of Buxgevden from Odenpe. The Order and Dorpat (Russian. Yuryev) then feuded and the Swordtails did not come to the aid of Dorpat.
    And more.
    Perhaps the author should dwell in more detail on the methods of spreading Christianity practiced by the Teutonic Order. Especially in Lithuania. People need to understand what exactly "fire and sword" means and how it looked in nature when viewed from the side. At least try to imagine how the shed smells, in which the population of an entire village was locked and burned together with babies, or what a Lithuanian man feels, in front of whom his pregnant wife's belly is ripped open and his children are ripped apart by horses before he is hacked to death.
    If in the XIII - XIV centuries. there was an international tribunal, the Teutons and the Swordsmen would definitely be recognized as criminal organizations guilty of genocide, massacres and ethnic cleansing.
  7. +8
    21 January 2019 11: 07
    ... the reason for this is the incorrect translation into Russian of one of the works of Karl Marx, who used the noun “monk” in relation to the Teutons, in German similar to the word “dog”. Karl Marx called them “Knight Monks”!

    I would like to clarify about the knight dogs. In the German dictionary I somehow did not manage to find the words "monk" and "dog" similar to each other, then, turning to the ubiquitous Wikipedia, I found the following: "Knight dogs is an epithet used in relation to the knights of the Teutonic Order. It is erroneous. translation from German. "Reitershunde." More correctly, the meaning can be translated as "knightly rabble", "horse rabble" or "horse pack". " Indeed, Reiters are knights, horsemen, and hunde is a dog and a literal translation of knights-dogs, but, apparently, in the German language the phrase has a meaning as indicated in Wikipedia, i.e. about "monks" there is not a word not a hint.
    1. +2
      22 January 2019 00: 11
      represents an erroneous translation with it. "Reitershunde » belay
      but what about the German word for "knightly union"? Could you tell? wink
  8. +2
    21 January 2019 11: 15
    And they poured all the roads and places with the blood of the Gentiles, and pursued them in all areas of the sea region called Rotelevik and Rotalia ... And the whole army on the first, and second, and third day pursued the running Estonians everywhere and killed right and left, until both people and horses became tired of fatigue.

    Henry of Latvia
    participant in one of the raids in northern Estonia in 1215

    Every year, residents of the Baltic countries celebrate Baltic Unity Day on September 22 - victory over the Order of the Sword-Bearers, which tormented the Baltic peoples for many years.
    Baltic Unity Day is not a public holiday, but nonetheless it is an important date in the history of Estonians, Latvians and Lithuanians. Many interesting events are timed to this day: thematic museum exhibitions, photo exhibitions, reconstruction of historical events and much more.
    © 2016 Sputnik Estonia
  9. +5
    21 January 2019 12: 39
    on Balga (the first crusader fortress in East Prussia), the remains of the Forburg church still contain the names of all the masters of the order inscribed on the wall. It is curious that they are inscribed in black, and only Ulrich von Jungingen is red. I saw it myself. And from Balga along the bay there is a road (gravel0-with slopes, bulk, with slopes and slopes in the right places .... still from the 1240s is a normal road.
    1. +3
      22 January 2019 10: 19
      Quote: sds127
      It is curious that they are painted in black, and only Ulrich von Jungingen is red. I saw it myself.

      This is probably as a symbol of death in battle. But others like masters died, there must be other names in red too. Did not notice ? or was the list partially corrupted?

      Quote: sds127
      And from Balga along the bay there is a road (gravel 0-with slopes, bulk, with slopes and slopes in the right places .... still with 1240-x-normal road.

      It's cool, but not surprising - in some places the ancient Roman expensive epochs of Augustus served 1000 years.
      1. +2
        22 January 2019 10: 35
        the list is complete, but only one master is selected .... I heard an opinion (but only an opinion, that is, inaccurate) -that he was noted because of the grandeur of defeat and personal courage when he died in a lost battle. On roads, that’s just the point. That surprisingly, in the local climate, ancient Roman roads would have already come Khan))
  10. +6
    21 January 2019 13: 41
    The expression "Teutonic" is just "German". Teutsche - German (Old German).
    In the first half of the XVII century, Michel turned into one of the symbols of the struggle of German purists for the purity of the language and became the protagonist of the propaganda leaflet “Der teutsche Michel” in 1642, where he complains about excessive clogging of the native language with borrowings and urges fellow citizens to get rid of them:

    I German Michel / versteh schier nichel /
    In meinem Vatterland / es ist ein schand. /
    Man thut ietzt reden / als wie die Schweden /
    In meinem Vatterland / pfuy dich der schand.
    Fast jeder Schneider / will jetzund leyder /
    Der Sprach erfahren sein / vnd red Latein:
    Welsch vnd Frantzösisch / halb Iponesisch /
    Wann er ist voll vnd toll / der grobe knoll

    I am a German Michel, my native place
    Conversation has become alien - this is shame and shame.
    Our language is getting poorer, because everyone is gravitating
    To Swedish words, this is shame and disgrace.
    And every tailor here and there at random
    From now on, babbling words in Latin
    French, Chukhon, and even Japanese.
    A good kid, but that's just a fool.

    And only in the 19th century Der teutsche Michel turned into Der deutsche Michel hi
  11. +1
    21 January 2019 14: 58
    Thanks for the interesting article, there are many more dark spots in the history of Eastern Europe.
  12. +2
    21 January 2019 16: 17
    Interesting article.
  13. -4
    22 January 2019 02: 05
    It was not worth confirming the thesis about the bad reputation of the order with frames from a propaganda film. Demonization of the order is counterproductive and unscientific. The orders contributed to the spread of Western civilization, they were always followed by trade.
    I recommend reading the accessible fundamental book of Arbuzov, the first fundamental research on the history of the Ostseey provinces - "An Essay on the History of Livonia, Estonia and Courland". The German edition was published in 1889 and was later reprinted twice, the Russian edition translated by V. Bock was published in St. Petersburg in 1912.
    Leonid Arbuzov was born on January 19, 1848 in the former capital of Courland - the city of Mitava (now Jelgava, Latvia). Father, nobleman Alexander Arbuzov (? - 1855), second lieutenant of the Russian Imperial Army, belonged to the Arbuzov family, who owned land in the Novgorod and Pskov provinces. Mother, Natalya Chudovskaya, comes from a family of Novgorod clergy, to whom Leonid’s great-grandfather belonged, Ivan Chudovsky (1765-1838), a priest at the Russian embassy in Berlin, and grandfather, Nikita Chudovsky (1792-1841), officer of the Russian army, lawyer, later who served in a civilian position in Livonia.
  14. 0
    22 January 2019 02: 29
    Compensation was the annual pension in 100 thousand thalers (50 thousand chervonets)


    The course of the chervonets (ducat) to the thaler is contrived and does not meet the realities.
    Considering that according to the 1782 exchange rate (taken from Jürgen Elert Kruse. Allgemeiner und besonders hamburgischer Contorist: welcher von den Währungen ... p.369), the Albertustaler was equal to 134 kopecks, the ducat (chervonets) -2 rubles 75 kopecks. Plus the question: what kind of thaler were you talking about? about the Prussian Reichstaller at the Grauman coin stop (14 tal. from the Cologne mark), conventional - 10 thalers of the Cologne mark, etc.
    for example, the ruble was equal to 1 Reichstaller 6 pennies 6 Pfennig (Prussian) (ibid., in addition, p. 22). And since money loves an account, it is necessary to clarify which thaler. I suspect that it was just the Prussian Reichstaller, and the ducat was 2 and 3/4 Reichstalers.
  15. +2
    22 January 2019 10: 33
    I also allow myself a number of additions to the article.

    Quote: Ryzhov V.A.
    The Teutons did not fight with Muslims and heretics in Europe - only against the Orthodox, pagans, and even Catholics.
    The author is probably not sufficiently familiar with the facts, or just accidentally said so. Just as one example - the situation at the beginning of the 15th century, the same era of Grunwald. Firstly, the anti-Order army included - a surprise, right? - Muslims (these were "Lithuanian Tatars" and actually part of the Tatars from the allied contingents).

    It is also worth noting the participation of the "Teutonic brothers" in the crusades against the Ottomans, who actively captured the Balkans in the 14-15th centuries (small order contingents participated in most of such operations up to Grunwald, after which the military power of the Teutons was undermined).

    Secondly, how did they not fight the heretics? For example, there was a certain Zizka, "during it," he, as a Czech mercenary as part of a contingent from the lands of the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation, arrived at the Grunwald field, where he fought with the enemies of the Order, was able to survive and return safely, at the same time having seen a lot (in the Soviet If this was mentioned in the literature, then for some reason Zhizhka's participation on the side of the anti-Order coalition was indicated). And then he headed the typically heretical movement of "Hussites" - "Taborites", against which knights from various parts of Europe, including the Teutonic Order, came out to fight, and, knowing perfectly well the tactics of the knights, developed a method of fighting it. Here is such a kind of history cycle ...
  16. VLR
    +2
    22 January 2019 11: 16
    Good afternoon, Michael. small clarifications on my part on this post:

    Quote: "The anti-Order army included - a surprise, right? - Muslims (these were" Lithuanian Tatars "and actually part of the Tatars from the allied contingents)."

    Well, why is it a surprise, I am writing about this in the description of the battle. Although here it is hardly possible to speak of military operations against Muslims. The Teutons and their "guests" would not have fought with pleasure in this battle with Muslims, but they acted as allies of the Order's opponents. This is not a battle of the Order against Islam, but a showdown between the Order and the coalition of Poland and Lithuania.

    Quote: "It is also worth noting the participation of the" Teutonic brothers "in the crusades against the Ottomans, who actively captured the Balkans in the 14-15th centuries (small order contingents participated in most of such operations up to Grunwald, after which the military power of the Teutons was undermined)."

    I also write about this. And after Grunwald they participated - I point out: "in 1429 the Order is still helping Hungary to repel the attack of the Turks."

    But I accept the remark - it was necessary to write in the preface: "Teutons practically did not fight with Muslims in Europe" (or "they fought very little")

    "Secondly, how did they not fight the heretics? For example, there was a certain Zizka," during it "he, as a Czech mercenary in the contingent from the lands of the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation, arrived at the field of Grunwald, where he fought with the enemies of the Order"

    Here you are confused - his squad fought with the Order, and not against the enemies of the Order.
    And Jan Жižka was not a heretic at that time.
    1. 0
      26 January 2019 22: 28
      Quote: VlR
      Well, why is it a surprise, I am writing about this in the description of the battle. Although here it is hardly possible to speak of military operations against Muslims. The Teutons and their "guests" would not have fought with pleasure in this battle with Muslims, but they acted as allies of the Order's opponents. This is not a battle of the Order against Islam, but a showdown between the Order and the coalition of Poland and Lithuania.

      Dear Valery, perhaps I did not read your text carefully enough, but it seemed to me that there were no such references there initially. Regarding who fought with whom - if the mercenaries did not need to explain anything, then it was difficult for the "guest knights", of whom there were quite a lot, to explain the need to fight the good Catholics - the Poles - so they were put on the left flank - not only against the Lithuanians, but especially against the Tatars!

      Quote: VlR
      Here you are confused - his squad fought with the Order, and not against the enemies of the Order.
      And Jan Жižka was not a heretic at that time.
      Yes, at that time Zizka was not a heretic, but later he became, and small Teutonic contingents also took part in the campaigns against him, so everything is ok. Moreover, German historians have an original documentary of the 15th century, according to which the unit where he was is just noted among the German mercenary contingents from Bohemia and Moravia (it was just that Czechs and others in the Soviet period were "not comme il faut" to admit that their national hero fought for the Teutons). hi
  17. +2
    22 January 2019 12: 50
    The article is interesting.
  18. +2
    22 January 2019 17: 27
    Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
    Yes, everything is simple - I read in one book about
    How easy it is to live in the world for such people. Everything is simple with them. The main thing is to read something in the book. And do not think about anything.
  19. 0
    29 January 2019 14: 08
    Interesting job!
  20. +1
    30 January 2019 13: 44
    Very informative!!! Thanks you! It turns out I did not know much ...
  21. 0
    31 January 2019 07: 54
    The article is all too simplistic. The Order in its own way played a very positive role in the case of, for example, trade with Russia and counterbalance to Poland and Lithuania. After the reprisal against the Order, the Poles began a full-scale expansion to the East.
  22. 0
    28 February 2019 16: 18
    It all began in 1143, when the first German hospital appeared in Jerusalem

    It's just TIN! Friends-Gentlemen-Comrades ... what "Germans"? Then there were the Germans? The Germans themselves never called themselves Germans ..... "Germans" is what in Russia was called "does not understand by our" .. All foreigners are Germans! Both the Scandinavians and the Dutch ... all ....
    Pseudo-historical fantasy not tired? Call it what IT is ...
  23. 0
    4 March 2019 00: 44
    Surrounded by Ilya of Muromets
    In the hoods black people -
    Crow covers,
    Hoodie long -
    Know the monks is all al priests!
    Persuade the knight
    Throw Russian Orthodox law.
    For treason
    All promise sulu great,
    And honor and respect ...

    Can I find the source?
  24. 0
    April 7 2019 19: 34
    - It's strange ... In such a detailed narrative, the castle of Tapiau is not mentioned. But he was first mentioned already in the 1254 (!) Year. It is older than the aforementioned Marienburg (Malbork), and served as the residence of the Order's commuters for a longer time. And after the residence was transferred to Marienburg, the castle housed order archives and a library.
    - There is a merit of the Order in the development of these lands ... the places were wild - but why would the Polish king give them to the Teutons.