Military Review
Sign In Register

The United States predicted the defeat of its AUG in the event of war against Russia

26
The US forces predict a defeat in the event of a large-scale war with Russia to the naval forces, or rather their parts - to the carrier groups. This conclusion was published in the American edition of The National Interest, and representatives of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Evaluations in Washington came to this conclusion. Statements made in the format of the report, in fact, cause some bewilderment, primarily due to the fact that in the United States itself the fleet is called the most powerful in the world.


Did the USA question superiority? .. Or do you just need more money from the budget?

The United States predicted the defeat of its AUG in the event of war against Russia


So, the speakers state that the carrier-based strike groups (AUG) of the United States Navy do not have sufficient survivability and range in solving operational problems. It is noted that there is no specialization for the existing modern weapons of the enemy. At the same time, the enemy was initially declared Russia. Also in the list of opponents - China.

From the material:
The AUG wing was modernized, but the range of the new aircraft is such that it is much lower than the range of missiles, not only Russia, but also China.


It is noted that Moscow and Beijing also possess weapons that can destroy not only AUG planes, but also aircraft carriers themselves.
What is the end result?

This is a proposal to reduce the number of aircraft carrier strike groups from 10 to 8 due to the economic inappropriateness of use, or to increase the intensity of the development of promising carrier-based fighter aircraft and strike (deck) drones. According to plans, the commissioning of such aviation technicians are planned by 2040.

Earlier, Chinese media published an assumption that by the end of the year, the modernized aircraft carrier Liaonin (originally a Soviet project) and Type 001A (Chinese development) could enter the sea. This information is not officially confirmed.
Photos used:
Wikipedia
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
26 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Theodore
    Theodore 16 December 2018 06: 27
    +10
    That they were not yet off the coast of Belarus! There they finally .......
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 16 December 2018 06: 31
      +1
      Quote: Theodore
      That they were not yet off the coast of Belarus! There they finally .......

      you do not find that the author of the article has a funny surname- "wikipedia".. winked
      1. For example
        For example 16 December 2018 06: 53
        +7
        You read from the beginning of the line. Learn a lot of interesting things wink
        -
        Used Photo: Wikipedia
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 16 December 2018 07: 08
          -1
          Quote: For example
          You read from the beginning of the line. Learn a lot of interesting things wink
          -
          Used Photo: Wikipedia

          you are too serious ... yes
      2. ANCIENT
        ANCIENT 16 December 2018 07: 01
        -1
        Yurievich hi -Wikipedia is not the last name of the author of the article is his gender wassat
        1. Non liberoid Russian
          Non liberoid Russian 16 December 2018 07: 15
          -1
          so, the fake bow repulsed ... so few emoticons?
      3. Non liberoid Russian
        Non liberoid Russian 16 December 2018 07: 14
        -1
        type funny, and everyone should laugh at your "joke"?
    2. 41 REGION
      41 REGION 16 December 2018 06: 33
      +2
      Quote: Theodore
      That they were not yet off the coast of Belarus! There they finally .......

      There only by submarine laughing
      1. AntonP
        AntonP 16 December 2018 06: 41
        0
        On the cloud you can still laughing
      2. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter 16 December 2018 07: 21
        +6
        hi
        Quote: 41 REGION
        There only by submarine

        Depths are not enough for submarines - only in the surface position. In general, we have been observing with binoculars for several years how the US 6th fleet rushes about in the Belarusian Sea in search of Belarus and is getting lost. lol
      3. Dirty Harry
        Dirty Harry 16 December 2018 13: 58
        +2
        Quote: 41 REGION
        There only by submarine

        if he doesn’t get, he will die in the steppes of Ukraine in an unequal aerial battle!
    3. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 16 December 2018 09: 26
      0
      NI, everything is clear, who else will scold them, and we will be praised
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 16 December 2018 11: 54
        +3
        Quote: Vol4ara
        NI, everything is clear, who else will scold them, and we will be praised

        Warrior! "National I" at least some American article with a report was scouted and presented to the public the conclusions ... And what did you read, write, with whom did you share the new info? Is it a scoffing consumer? Why am I writing this. And besides, that "note in the newspaper" Cherkani, take the trouble of the boy so that we discuss your works ... But this is so, by the way. yes
        And in the case.
        US admirals have long suspected that something was wrong, as soon as they started talking about the state security zone and the development and construction of their carriers. They have no antidote for now, but high-breasted targets are available. In addition, aviation and underwater carriers and in our country and the Middle Kingdom in stock. So, the fears of the Yankees did not grow from scratch. But, please note, they are not going to refuse AVU!
        And what we want. For there will not be a balanced fleet without air cover in the ocean zone.
        IMHO.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 16 December 2018 13: 48
          +1
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          In addition, aviation and underwater carriers in our country and in China.

          Sasha hi
          And how did the Swedish "Gotland", during NATO exercises, manage to approach an aircraft carrier, at a torpedo launch distance, fire a volley and leave without being detected?
          I mean, the AUG, as a goal, is not as invulnerable as is commonly believed.
  2. irazum
    irazum 16 December 2018 06: 40
    +1
    What is the article about?
    1. Destiny
      Destiny 16 December 2018 06: 47
      +1
      Quote: irazum
      What is the article about?

      just need more money from the budget wink
    2. Russia
      Russia 16 December 2018 07: 28
      +4
      They break like girls. They are engaged in narcissism, a single-actor theater. smile
  3. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 16 December 2018 07: 03
    0
    With this statement, the Yankees want to mislead us so that we never build aircraft carriers for ourselves.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  4. pru-pavel
    pru-pavel 16 December 2018 07: 29
    +2
    In America, the national interest is roughly like the Russian Radio Liberty in Russia. The director of national interest is American Dmitry Simes, like most Americans were born in Moscow, as for all Americans, Russian is his native language
    It is clearly seen that America lost once the Americans are already born in the USSR and think in Russian. You can even not write anything about AUGs. It is strange, of course, that other US military-analytical publications on VO are not even mentioned (or is it not strange?)
    1. romb
      romb 16 December 2018 08: 01
      +1
      There is even more. One can be almost sure that no one in the United States really knows about the existence of such a sharashka as National Interest.
  5. Spine
    Spine 16 December 2018 08: 23
    +1
    Did the USA question superiority? .. Or do you just need more money from the budget?

    Most likely this and that .. One does not interfere with the other!
  6. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 16 December 2018 08: 45
    +2
    They want to be like in the days of the development of America ... guns against arrows?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Kiwik
      Kiwik 16 December 2018 12: 29
      0
      And then the arrow suddenly thermonuclear
  7. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 16 December 2018 10: 39
    0
    Still, the Navy admirals were clearly dissatisfied with how the money was allocated from the defense budget for 2019 ...
  8. Hypersound
    Hypersound 16 December 2018 11: 19
    0
    1 "Dagger" with a special warhead - and no Aug. While we are armed with 10 missiles = just for 10 Aug. Although recently, pndos seems to have already 11 Aug
  9. Nait
    Nait 16 December 2018 19: 51
    0
    I don’t understand why they just started talking about it?
    After all, the AUG has always been a good target, and in principle it was not intended for war with the alliance.
    After all, all of them can be simply "over-flooded" in a short time.
    And without the "Daggers".