Military Review

Trump's adviser: Chinese missiles are tagged to the very heart of Russia

116
Advisor to the President of the United States for National Security John Bolton continues his tour of the post-Soviet space. After visiting Moscow and Yerevan, Bolton went to Tbilisi, where he made another statement on the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles. Recall that a few days ago, Donald Trump said that this treaty "is not being respected by Russia", and therefore the US is withdrawing from it. In Moscow, they commented on it this way: Russia does not violate the treaty, but the United States de facto left it a long time ago, now registering a way out and de jure.


Trump's adviser: Chinese missiles are tagged to the very heart of Russia


While on a visit to Georgia, Bolton said that there was no point in the INF Treaty taking into account the fact that medium-range and shorter-range missiles are at the disposal of China. At the same time, the adviser to the American president added the following phrase:
Chinese missiles threaten Russia. The heart of Russia is in the zone of destruction of these missiles of Beijing.


The INF Treaty itself, John Bolton, called the Cold War relic.

Recall that the INF Treaty was signed by the heads of the USSR and the USA (Gorbachev and Reagan) in 1987. The treaty envisages the elimination of missiles with a range from 500 km to 5,5 thousand km and ground launchers. The Americans, having signed this treaty, began the implementation of the SMD missile program for aviation and marine (surface and underwater) carriers. This was not considered a violation. But as soon as Russia tested "Calibers" from the same surface carriers, a hubbub rose in the United States about "violations". Also in the USA they say that Iskander missiles have a range of more than 500 km. The policy of double standards from the United States in the style of "What is allowed to Jupiter ..."
Photos used:
Facebook
116 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 26 October 2018 19: 55
    -3
    so, and the phrase is where it went, or written in invisible ink belay
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 26 October 2018 19: 58
      +24
      Any weapon will mark where the owner will aim it .. For the Chinese, I would be careful and cautious .. a potentially very dangerous opponent ..
      1. hrych
        hrych 26 October 2018 20: 04
        -1
        Everything was said absolutely right exactly by the Chinese, under Dan they were sold to the West and when the USSR and the USA entered into an agreement, it was precisely Chinese missiles that plyusovat to Western missiles directed against us. Not only that, missiles, that nuclear weapons, it was imprudently presented to them by the USSR. Good gifts plus to Manchuria and Turkestan (Uyghuria). In general, you marvel at the political bureaucratic internationalists. They thanked the beetle eaters to the fullest, also in Afghanistan we were openly crap. Now, the Chinese must pay for the betrayal. Trump needs to be supported in his quest to strangle the Chinese, and on this we should also make money. Judah must always hang on a tree.
        1. Operator
          Operator 26 October 2018 20: 28
          +9
          Quote: hrych
          nuclear weapons, they imprudently gave the USSR and gave

          Khrushchev denied Mao nuclear weapons.

          The United States presented nuclear weapons to China, allowing several dozen American nuclear scientists of Chinese nationality to participate in the Manhattan project in the mid-1950s.
          1. hrych
            hrych 26 October 2018 20: 48
            +10
            China’s nuclear program was initially carried out with the active assistance of the USSR: for the period 1950-1960, about 10 thousand Soviet specialists in the nuclear industry visited China, in addition, about 11 thousand Chinese specialists and 1 thousand scientists in the nuclear industry underwent education and training in the Soviet Union. On October 15, 1957, a second agreement was signed which provided for the transfer to China of nuclear weapons manufacturing technology, with the exception of nuclear submarine construction technologies. Building factories for uranium enrichment in Baotou and Lanzhou began in 1958. Everything for the creation of nuclear weapons was done even after the complication of Soviet-Chinese relations, assistance from the USSR was curtailed, Soviet experts in the nuclear industry (in the amount of 10-12 thousand) were recalled from China, but this could no longer stop the progress of the Chinese nuclear project. Therefore, the USSR and its bald corn leadership are clearly to blame for the appearance of a nuclear enemy on the border.
        2. Proxima
          Proxima 26 October 2018 20: 33
          +31
          Do not go to your grandmother, for a kilometer you can see how the United States is trying to pit Russia and China. Nothing new, divide and conquer winked
          1. alexmach
            alexmach 27 October 2018 01: 54
            -2
            In this article, Comrade Bolton says it’s not stupid to take away ... not like in the previous one.
            1. Mih1974
              Mih1974 27 October 2018 03: 04
              +7
              Yes, yes, "Chinese missiles are directed," and who is who knows the countries? Oh and sho so - not China at all, but just the United States - Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, we at least managed to save Syria am So whose whose missiles are directed?
              1. hrych
                hrych 27 October 2018 09: 35
                +1
                The Chinese occupied Tibet, by and large occupied Uyghuria and Manchuria (though the USSR gave them more quickly), they got tinsel from India, Vietnam and the Soviet Union, and the Maoist terrorists dirty the whole of Indochina, including Bangladesh. It’s just that the United States is more successful in its military, and the Chinese have quarreled with all neighbors, fought, though in most cases they got horns.
                1. igorbrsv
                  igorbrsv 27 October 2018 11: 55
                  +1
                  And the United States and its neighbors did not quarrel and did not grab. Haha And how did you get to China Manchuria? Her Japanese occupied. We saved China and gave it to them. We built communism. And China was a communist country. Vietnam wanted to pick up the United States and not China
                  1. hrych
                    hrych 27 October 2018 12: 01
                    0
                    So this is a great mistake, if the Manchurian People’s Republic were made like Mongolia, and here’s the buffer, there is no common border and our military bases are there. It is more complicated with Turkestan (Uyguria), there Basmachism, mountains, etc., like they shoved themselves off, so again short-sightedness, in the extreme case, a puppet government would have been set up. In short, they themselves raised a monster that the West tamed against us. But it’s fine, if, through joint efforts of the United States, they bring the matter to an end, then Uyghur will be, and Manchuria, and Tibet, as independent states.
                    1. igorbrsv
                      igorbrsv 27 October 2018 12: 10
                      0
                      Well, we only have time to stick a knife in the United States in the back, otherwise these are not independent states, but the states of America. Our land at that time did not clean up, apparently thinking that China would be grateful until the end of time. Or maybe there was nothing to fuck with them request
                      1. hrych
                        hrych 27 October 2018 12: 23
                        0
                        That the Manchus, that the Uighurs (like the Tibetans), of course, the feudal and extremely hostile peoples of the Soviet regime. We instructed them to nag the Chinese, because they would have to send their troops there, lose people from resistance. And you just had not to meddle with your communism, to give them the opportunity to build a little on their own, but with our protectorate, the same Puy would still be left the king of Manchuria and all. No, it is imperative that the Soviet power and the proletariat be necessary, and if there is no proletariat at all, there is a slave system and a monarchy, and the peasants immediately and on the collective farm, of course, wait for resistance. Well, that’s what they got because of stupidity ...
          2. Maki Avellevich
            Maki Avellevich 27 October 2018 08: 06
            +2
            Quote: Proxima
            Do not go to your grandmother, for a kilometer you can see how the United States is trying to pit Russia and China. Nothing new, divide and conquer

            Of course they want to, but even without the Americans, the future is not pink between Russia and China.
            even Israel, although it seems to be far from China, is afraid of the dragon
            1. igorbrsv
              igorbrsv 27 October 2018 09: 26
              0
              He is still far away. And could become a Chinese province in the distant future. Israel is more beneficial to support the United States
        3. Svarog
          Svarog 26 October 2018 20: 41
          +8
          Quote: hrych
          Trump needs to be supported in his quest to strangle the Chinese, and on this we should also make money. Judah must always hang on a tree.

          I totally agree with you emotionally. .. but here everything is shaky .. amerkosy, they can also substitute and then the Chinese will turn into a real and not a potential enemy .. and it will be very difficult for us .. when on the one hand China and on the other America ..
        4. sergo1914
          sergo1914 27 October 2018 00: 25
          +1
          Quote: hrych
          Everything was said absolutely right exactly by the Chinese, under Dan they were sold to the West and when the USSR and the USA entered into an agreement, it was precisely Chinese missiles that plyusovat to Western missiles directed against us.



          Plus everything that can fly. The Americans are adding us, China, ... China, in general, has everything, including India and Pakistan (with which to put a bolt on the rest of the world and cut among themselves). Israel plus all the goyim. I will say more. “Spartak” plus CSKA and Dynamo (oops ... girls also plus). "Torpedo" plus all the dark ones. Such is the arithmetic.
        5. igorbrsv
          igorbrsv 27 October 2018 09: 22
          0
          China's interest is to become a world leader. The greatest danger now comes from the United States. Suppose that China will now start a war with Russia. Regardless of the outcome, both countries will cease to exist, because the United States has its own hegemony. China is primarily gouging the United States, since we are a weaker opponent. Also, China can hope for our help because the goals coincide. It makes no sense to predict further
      2. ANCIENT
        ANCIENT 26 October 2018 20: 04
        +5
        I’ll repeat the US enemy for the hundredth time, and the Chinese fellow travelers until they become really strong, capturing, for example, Taiwan with minimal casualties by armed means. Here, then, the Basta-Chinese dragon will wish for a sea of ​​blood, and will continue by force to solve what they are trying to solve with the help of diplomacy ..
        1. Andrey Chistyakov
          Andrey Chistyakov 26 October 2018 20: 11
          +5
          They probably thought so in 1969.
        2. Maki Avellevich
          Maki Avellevich 27 October 2018 08: 08
          +2
          Quote: ANCIENT
          I’ll repeat the US enemy for the hundredth time, and the Chinese fellow travelers until they become truly strong, capturing, for example, Taiwan with minimal casualties by armed means

          China is already strong. what forces will the island give him?
          prestige, yes, not very strong.
      3. Oleg123219307
        Oleg123219307 26 October 2018 20: 08
        +22
        Potentially, yes, but I don’t really believe in real conflict. The population of China is no longer growing, the economy is developing actively, it is profitable for them to trade with us and not to fight. I tried to imagine a hypothetical military conflict with China, and I do not see an acceptable scenario for them. To the developed more or less European part of Russia from China, the floor of the planet is stamped, and those areas that are adjacent to them are empty taiga, what is there to capture? Buried specifically for such a case, a landmine? They already buy resources almost at cost, and the risk of getting five hundred nuclear attacks on a very limited and densely populated coastal area for the sake of an empty forest seems at least strange. China will not fight with us, they are too vulnerable to answer and the potential benefit is too small.
        No, in the case of China, we should not be afraid of missiles, but peaceful investments for the little ones buying up the whole country.
        1. Jolly oldster sailor
          Jolly oldster sailor 26 October 2018 20: 12
          +3
          Quote: oleg123219307
          what is there to capture?

          Hello, Oleg! Yes, a lot of things .. wink
          1. Oleg123219307
            Oleg123219307 26 October 2018 20: 17
            +10
            Paraphrase. What is there to economically capture? There is no infrastructure, no roads, no population, no industry, no agriculture. Most of Siberia is a wild wilderness overgrown with forests, for which even the USSR did not have the means and desire to develop. And this is in peacetime. In the military, no moral obstacles such as civilians held hostage will deter the military from a couple of hundred megaton gifts to the attacking invaders. Nobody bothers to lick them, but with the exception of the fabulous situation that someone will give them all of Siberia, I can’t imagine how to capture it in a form suitable for development.
            1. Jolly oldster sailor
              Jolly oldster sailor 26 October 2018 20: 22
              +4
              good There is nothing to cover. My bit card. laughing hi
              1. bulvas
                bulvas 26 October 2018 21: 26
                +2
                Quote: oleg123219307
                Potentially, yes, but I don’t really believe in real conflict.



                I agree with Oleg

                Add the loss of beneficial transit of goods through the territory of Russia, NSR

                1. Jolly oldster sailor
                  Jolly oldster sailor 26 October 2018 21: 28
                  +4
                  So I would like to agree with Oleg to be, but something is holding back ... wink
                  1. bulvas
                    bulvas 26 October 2018 21: 30
                    +2
                    Quote: Jolly oldster sailor
                    So I would like to agree with Oleg to be, but something is holding back ... wink


                    So what to do?
                    The means is known - to forge swords and shields, if the threat of damage is unacceptable, the desire to capture will fade away.


                    Still, it is necessary to maintain equilibrium, while in addition to China there is the USA, the parties will look back at each other.


                    Therefore, they are not in a hurry to do the nesting, they also do not need a strong Russia.

                    We need it, we have money, but for now there is no one to work
            2. Astronaut
              Astronaut 26 October 2018 22: 45
              +1
              No infrastructure, no roads, no population, no industry

              But do you generally know that the development of Eastern Siberia is in full swing, that deposits are being developed not far from the place where the Tunguska meteorite fell, that an oil pipeline is being built in that direction?
              1. igorbrsv
                igorbrsv 27 October 2018 09: 33
                +1
                But the oil field will become radioactive. What to do with him then
                1. Astronaut
                  Astronaut 27 October 2018 21: 35
                  0
                  at great depths - hardly
            3. Mih1974
              Mih1974 27 October 2018 03: 08
              +6
              They want to say Siberia, that is it?

              Well, I don’t know, I don’t know lol since so "ask" then - well, you understand laughing
            4. igorbrsv
              igorbrsv 27 October 2018 09: 30
              +1
              Clearly stated
        2. Svarog
          Svarog 26 October 2018 21: 02
          +7
          Quote: oleg123219307
          China’s population is no longer growing, uh

          Their population is not growing temporarily. The Chinese are playing back - already in November 2013 they began to soften the policy of "one family - one child", which was introduced in 1978. And now, you can already have two .. But even when it was forbidden to have more than one child, the Chinese managed to breed and there were two, or even three children in the family .. This is due to the fact that the Chinese really want to have a boy, a girl for them a half-man .. So, not everything here is unambiguous, especially considering the fact that the Chinese disperse around the world and do not integrate into the society of the adopted state, but create closed enclaves and breed there in 2005 in the USA there were 1,5 mln. there are already 2015 Chinese in 3,5.


          Quote: oleg123219307
          I tried to imagine a hypothetical military conflict with China, and I do not see an acceptable scenario for them.

          There are many scenarios .. most likely if Europe attacks us .. and the Chinese will connect .. They will not risk alone, but they will join .. easily ..
          Quote: oleg123219307
          To the developed more or less European part of Russia from China, the floor of the planet is stamped, and those areas that are adjacent to them are empty taiga, what is there to capture?

          It is her and capture .. all the natural resources are there .. including Baikal ..
          Quote: oleg123219307
          China will not fight with us, they are too vulnerable to answer and the potential benefit is too small.

          The benefit is colossal - territory, natural resources, drinking water ... etc
          Quote: oleg123219307
          No, in the case of China, we should not be afraid of missiles, but peaceful investments for the little ones buying up the whole country.

          This is just what you don’t need to be afraid of, but you need to welcome .. But investment is investment-investment. The Chinese, as well as everyone else, invest only in our natural resources .. who actually do not really need investments, as everyone knows they are limited .. But our boobies in the government are happy to sell to the Chinese and the rest, thereby making money from our natural resources , while not taking anything substantial in return ..
          The Chinese are very reluctant to invest in our economy, and this is just an indicator of their "friendly mood" at a time when we really need investments, Chinese banks decided to obey the CU sanctions they imposed against us ..
          1. Astronaut
            Astronaut 26 October 2018 22: 48
            +1
            most likely if Europe attacks us ..

            I sincerely laughed at this promise laughing
            1. Svarog
              Svarog 26 October 2018 23: 33
              +7
              Quote: Astronaut
              most likely if Europe attacks us ..

              I sincerely laughed at this promise laughing

              What do you think is funny? Or do you think the United States will first climb ... everything will be as before .. and if anything starts, then from Europe .. Poland, some kind or the Germans again ..
            2. Mih1974
              Mih1974 27 October 2018 03: 12
              +1
              Remember the "lost missile", and the "canned" operation organized by the Nazis - a couple of such acts either "lose" a nuclear bomb across the border to us or drop them themselves, and they will say that we attacked them (see the idiocy of sripals). fool and again "Dracht Nacht Osten" negative .
              I support Zhirik - to burn England to hell with a nuclear strike, as a "last warning" to the Americans. good
          2. Oleg123219307
            Oleg123219307 27 October 2018 04: 35
            +2
            The growth of the population of China is restrained not only artificially, but also by factors of well-being and living standards of children that are usual for developed countries. Families begin to plan there, and 10 children in the city are more parasites in the family than helpers in the field. So there is something to argue about, but statistics indicate a lack of population growth. About the scenario in which Europe attacks us together with China. Not even funny. Firstly, they don’t agree on how to divide, secondly, no sane European leader provides such an economically aggressive power as China with the opportunity to put a paw on our resources, it is suicide for them, and thirdly, the attack from Europe has not grown. In the United States, one can still believe that they have the means to seriously spoil us, but they and China are not on the way, and Europe can only die beautifully in this scenario. About the resources. Over the sea, a heifer is half a cow, but it is expensive to transport. I declare myself emperor and sole ruler of the star Aldebaran. All the riches of this star system belong to me. How would they only be delivered here. Siberia has enormous resources. In the ground. They need to be explored, obtained, transported. And all this in the wild, crossed by hundreds of rivers, swamps, the beast, and simply with a pleasant resort climate in winter. Without equipment adapted to the cold, the vile and other joys of equipment, and even under a cheerful rain from the radioactive ashes of the burnt rear, fervently flowing into the very drinking water bodies that will glow for 50 more years at night ... I even sympathize with the invaders. They will have a difficult life and not a long one. Although not. I do not sympathize. Enemies and the road there.
            But underestimating the danger of China's economic expansion seems imprudent. They have already bought up half of South America, and how correctly you wrote here in the comments spread around the world in large numbers. We are not the United States, we do not have such an economy. Tomorrow we may be surprised to find that Siberia is not particularly ours either, but without war, but by law. Bought understand. Here it is necessary to protect yourself from this in the first place. But defending is not stupid, building walls along the borders will not help anyway, but developing these regions, investing money not in regular bonds, but in large-scale infrastructure projects. So that this land does not stand idle and is not sold for nothing to interested foreign businessmen, as is now being done, but benefits Russia. Then you don’t have to be afraid of anyone at all, they’ll do it themselves.
            1. Astronaut
              Astronaut 27 October 2018 09: 27
              0
              It’s a pity you can’t put the second one + put it, I fully support it, well, unless they will glow for 70 years, not 50 wink
          3. igorbrsv
            igorbrsv 27 October 2018 09: 35
            +1
            . the Chinese really want to have just a boy, a girl for them is half-human

            I’m like a Chinese man belay
        3. Vita vko
          Vita vko 26 October 2018 22: 44
          +5
          Quote: oleg123219307
          in the case of China, one should not be afraid of rockets

          China is much less dangerous for Russia than your apartment neighbors. They are much more likely to cause a flood, fire, cut down electricity, etc.
          The United States, represented by Bolton’s chief militarist, wants to drive a wedge in relations between Russia and China, blackmailing the withdrawal from the INF Treaty and START-3. Indeed, it is the military-political union of China and Russia that really threatens the United States. In the USA, they finally realized that another 2-3 years and the American economic model would remain overboard in world history. Already, the dollar is turning into a soap bubble that could burst at any time. And if it were not for the threat of mutual annihilation, the world war had already begun long ago.
          Therefore, the main problem now is not the USA, but human psychology, which on the basis of hatred already admits the very possibility of war, transferring it from the category of impossible to the category of probable and further along the psychological scheme of the "Overton window".
          At the same time, even here on the site, many forget the basics of using WMD. In particular, in the nuclear war the United States and Russia in the first 30 minutes, every second will die. Within a month, no more than 10 - 20% of the entire population will remain. and then everything according to the plan of the apocalypse is nuclear winter, mass famine and the primitive system, where survivors will envy the dead immediately.
          1. Mih1974
            Mih1974 27 October 2018 03: 22
            0
            Would you like to treat your head, what the hell is "post-apocalypse and primitive order? Tea will not transfer either the United States or Russia to another planet, and modern South America, Australia, South Asia, and Japan, if we don't bang it, will not go anywhere. - more than a "deposit of civilization"))
            As an example - Herosima and Chernobyl - the people are already living in the very center of the bombing, and people are returning to Chernobyl (illegally).
            1. Astronaut
              Astronaut 27 October 2018 09: 34
              0
              The example of Hiroshima and Chernobyl is not entirely successful. In Hiroshima, there was a full-fledged nuclear explosion, when most of the elements "interacted", and in Chernobyl there was a release, from the point of view of pollution, a more disgusting thing!
              1. Mih1974
                Mih1974 27 October 2018 13: 34
                0
                More than correct words, but he cited these two tragedies as "nuclear disasters" which are clear to everyone (in general terms). And as an example that even with a full exchange of nuclear ravages between the United States and Russia, there will remain a large part of the planet that will not be radioactively affected in any way, which has a sufficient supply of culture, technology, science so that the World and Humanity continue their development and not slide into the Stone Age and lose even writing.
                1. Astronaut
                  Astronaut 27 October 2018 21: 33
                  0
                  I do not think that it will remain, they will "hammer" everyone to the heap ...
            2. igorbrsv
              igorbrsv 27 October 2018 09: 42
              0
              20 kilotons were dumped on Hiroshima. Have you heard the tsar’s bomb test? If it was placed correctly, then after those tests we would not have spoken. Well, or talked with a forked tongue leaning on the tail crying
          2. Astronaut
            Astronaut 27 October 2018 09: 29
            0
            There will never be a military-political union of Russia and China, however also the dollar will never turn into a soap bubble, alas. Do not wishful thinking!
        4. Alexander Ra
          Alexander Ra 27 October 2018 07: 48
          0
          Quote: oleg123219307
          empty taiga, what is there to capture?

          Land. In the border zone of China, 200 million people are 10 times more than in all of Siberia and the Far East. From this land they will receive a 1000-fold return, unlike us. They are very touched by Baikal.
        5. Maki Avellevich
          Maki Avellevich 27 October 2018 08: 16
          0
          your logic is logical. I forget that it is not uncommon to miss history when an opponent performs actions that obey only his subjective sense of reality.
          your frames are strong but people they are such people ..
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. Vladimir Postnikov
        Vladimir Postnikov 27 October 2018 13: 36
        0
        Quote: Svarog
        For the Chinese, I would be careful and cautious .. potentially a very dangerous opponent ..

        Do you think Russia has a wide selection? Not. The choice is very limited. Either an alliance with China, or with the United States. Why is the US in such a hurry with Russia? Do you think you are afraid of Russia's growing power? You are deeply mistaken. Russia lags behind the USA and China everywhere: economics, science, innovations. They could calmly wait for Russia to finally fall apart, like the USSR. Yes, they can’t wait. They are frightened by the growing power of China. Destroy China in alliance with Russia they no longer have the strength to do. And one by one is possible.
        Bolton did everything right. It uses a cultural factor that is very effective, as your example shows, as does the example of many commentators here. Western culture is closer to most Russians than Chinese culture. He knows that the so-called Russian elite is more European. So he throws the apple of discord. And at the same time sets the price. Only with the price they will deceive, as they have been doing all this recently. If we can cope with China, then the price for Russia will then increase by orders of magnitude.
        China is aware that it cannot survive without Russia. He needs Russia as an ally.
        Even if we consider China as a danger to Russia, we must realize that it is recommended to choose the lesser of the two dangers.
        And if so, then Bolton should demonstrate an unequivocal position so that he does not even have illusions. But it follows, but in fact Bolton has achieved a certain goal, having raised doubt not only in you. The cultural factor is a strong argument.
      6. Dr. Bermental
        Dr. Bermental 27 October 2018 22: 48
        0
        It is interesting whether it is possible to retarget Chinese missiles in flight?) back or where necessary?)
    2. Finches
      Finches 26 October 2018 20: 01
      +11
      He does not know history well! The Chinese lick their lips at Siberia, but only in Bolton’s wet dreams ... God knows when they built a wall and not so much for external enemies as for themselves - China, a great empire, until it begins to cross the wall ... As a material reminder of its capabilities ! Wise nation! Thanks to half-fools ..., Khrushchev, they perked up a bit and put a bolt on the warning of their ancestors, they were stuck in Russia, and several dozen people from our side reminded the brave Chinese that their ancestors were not fools .... So, Americans need to worry yourself more — there in New York, if all the Chinese leave the town’s tea-house, then America will get a kirdyk ... Bolton, along with his boss, will ask the GDP for a plot near Rostov, next to Yanukovych! laughing
    3. major147
      major147 26 October 2018 21: 15
      +7
      "Chinese missiles are aimed at the very heart of Russia!"
      Oh god What a touching concern for Russia! He probably can’t eat, so worried!
      1. Yuri Y.
        Yuri Y. 26 October 2018 22: 45
        0
        major147 "Chinese missiles are aimed at the very heart of Russia!"
        Already noted on some website. Maybe they mark (Chinese missiles). And we don’t have them? I do not think that the Chinese will destroy their world by war. Amerikosam all at once. But, such an impression, they do not realize that there will be nothing. ))) Or maybe China will only remain.
    4. Machito
      Machito 26 October 2018 22: 27
      +2
      There is no need to blame the mirror, if the stigma is in the cannon. The US blames others for what they themselves are guilty of. Simple practice. It is clear that China’s missiles are aimed somewhere, and very likely to Russia. The military of any country loses all the scenarios. But where is the US going to deploy its medium and short-range missiles? Really in Canada? No. They will accommodate them in Europe, and maybe in Taiwan. Well, to Taiwan we are like a door to something, and from Estonia to St. Petersburg one or two minutes of flight. By deploying such missiles along our borders, they will achieve Cold War 2.0, a new arms race, having fenced off the Russian Iron Curtain from the Russian Federation, building targets for our missiles from their allies, causing economic damage to us and the European Union.
      1. dSK
        dSK 27 October 2018 02: 53
        0
        Quote: Bearded
        They will accommodate them in Europe, and maybe in Taiwan.
        States already deployed missile defense systems in South Korea sort of like against nuclear weapons in North Korea. But everyone knows that these launch containers can be charged "Tomahawks".
        The representative of Russia said at the UN that the United States is preparing for war.
        Deputy Belarussian Foreign Ministry Non-Proliferation and Arms Control Department Deputy Chairman Andrei Belousov said that, withdrawing from the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF) Washington is preparing a war.
        TASS yesterday at 20:17
    5. CERBERFOL
      CERBERFOL 27 October 2018 04: 42
      +1
      Carefully and cautiously it is necessary to relate to France. Since the French missiles can reach Washington
  2. Andrey Chistyakov
    Andrey Chistyakov 26 October 2018 20: 03
    +4
    Are the Chinese in the know?
    1. Dr.KonradMorgen
      Dr.KonradMorgen 27 October 2018 01: 10
      -1
      No, not in the know. smile In a normal peacetime situation, the warheads to their strategic BR are stored undocked from missiles in the arsenals of missile bases.
  3. boriz
    boriz 26 October 2018 20: 04
    +8
    What a touching concern! Already a tear breaks through.
  4. O. Bender
    O. Bender 26 October 2018 20: 09
    +1
    Yes, it’s just a bolt. The old marzzmatik is in the service of the US State Department. Everything is rushing about Russia, poor fellow.
  5. Radikal
    Radikal 26 October 2018 20: 10
    +2
    Quote: Finches
    He does not know history well! The Chinese lick their lips at Siberia, but only in Bolton’s wet dreams ... God knows when they built a wall and not so much for external enemies as for themselves - China, a great empire, until it begins to cross the wall ... As a material reminder of its capabilities ! Wise nation! Thanks to half-fools ..., Khrushchev, they perked up a bit and put a bolt on the warning of their ancestors, they were stuck in Russia, and several dozen people from our side reminded the brave Chinese that their ancestors were not fools .... So, Americans need to worry yourself more — there in New York, if all the Chinese leave the town’s tea-house, then America will get a kirdyk ... Bolton, along with his boss, will ask the GDP for a plot near Rostov, next to Yanukovych! laughing

    The Guarantor did not give a damn about the blood of these "several dozen people on our side," giving the Damansky Island to the Chinese! sad
    1. Fedorov
      Fedorov 26 October 2018 20: 39
      +6
      The guarantor didn’t give a damn about giving Damansky Island to the Chinese!

      There is such garbage - its size for udine shock battery MLRS. My opinion is that Russia does not need it. BUT!
      By agreement, China has withdrawn ALL heavy weapons from the border with Russia by 200 km, and Russia by 60 km. There are only border guards. And they sacredly observe this agreement. Maybe the "guarantor did not" spit at all?
      1. Machito
        Machito 26 October 2018 22: 38
        +3
        By settling territorial disputes by delimiting the border with China, Putin removed many concerns, won the trust of a potential ally, and removed obstacles to joint economic development. There are many territorial disputes in Eurasia that impede full cooperation between countries: Russia and Japan, North and South Korea, China and Vietnam, China and India, India and Pakistan, etc. The United States is trying to stick its nose into every dispute to fuel the conflict and destabilize Eurasia, which creates difficulties in the implementation of the Great Silk Road (the term was coined by the uncle of the "red baron" von Richthofen).
    2. Tersky
      Tersky 26 October 2018 21: 19
      +2
      Quote: Radikal
      The guarantor didn’t give a damn about giving Damansky Island to the Chinese!

      Well, yes ... he is the guarantor, where else to put it ... request . Speech on transfer about. Damansky entered on 20 on October 1969 in negotiations between the heads of government of the USSR and China, where they managed to reach an agreement on the need to revise the Soviet-Chinese border. Damansky Island moved to China in 1991. And under what matters is the guarantor incomprehensible to me ... what
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 26 October 2018 22: 03
        0
        laughing The most "gifted" hastened to stick to cons. Once again, I was convinced that they are being put not for a comment with an undeniable argument, but for mentioning Putin in a positive declination.
        1. Fedorov
          Fedorov 26 October 2018 22: 47
          +1
          Don't mind wink Not everyone in the evening is fine, even with a sense of humor, and then midnight soon. Friday is!
  6. Fedorov
    Fedorov 26 October 2018 20: 14
    +4
    The whole joke is that they want to use these missiles to put pressure on China., Europe does not care for them. The South China Sea gives them no peace. There, China is growing every year, mattresses are losing influence. This region is that of the Suez Canal. They themselves called China the number one enemy. China has them, but they do not.
    So it wants Russia and China to push their heads with stupid statements.
    In my opinion, the people of the United States will in any case anyway from whose rocket to ashes turn
  7. Jerk
    Jerk 26 October 2018 20: 18
    +7
    China's strategic adversary is the United States, the Russian Federation for them is "the enemy of our enemy", nothing is more stupid than raising its tail against the Russian Federation, in principle, China cannot invent.
    In short, as always - all tripod propaganda is aimed at the same idiots as the main population in the USA. On this they have long burned for large - except in the United States there are nowhere else such deposits of mass - mentally retarded organisms. And in their absence, propaganda does not work; rather, it even works the other way around, showing the deceit of US policy.
    Congratulations, Bolt, you sat down in a puddle again
  8. al3x
    al3x 26 October 2018 20: 23
    +1
    What a specious presentation of information by Mr. D. Bolton. He cares about Russia, he decided to open America for us about China. Thank you, we all be yourself.
  9. Vadim851
    Vadim851 26 October 2018 20: 23
    0
    On the other hand, the Chinese are developing their nuclear forces as they please, and their MRBM is the basis of their nuclear potential, they are not bound by a treaty, and soon there will be long-range ground-based missiles. So there are probably more pluses than minuses in breaking this treaty. The United States can probably place axes on ground launchers in Romania, and under certain conditions, anti-missiles can carry warheads, and the Iskander OTRK is likely to operate at 500+ km. Therefore, withdrawal from this agreement is only a matter of time. Also, a trap cannot be ruled out - supposedly let us produce MRBMs and the Americans are sure that they can intercept them, the technology does not stand still.
  10. Adimius38
    Adimius38 26 October 2018 20: 28
    0
    all right, China has missiles that are capable of delivering a nuclear strike against Russia; speech is about medium-range missiles
  11. Adimius38
    Adimius38 26 October 2018 20: 30
    -1
    It’s clear that for China we are not the first goal, but it’s quite possible, if not at the moment
  12. steelmaker
    steelmaker 26 October 2018 20: 30
    0
    Well, good. We already have something to answer. The United States has long ceased to comply with it. And Putin is too polite to "bang on the table" with his fist. I hope now he will not be shy.
  13. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 26 October 2018 20: 38
    +5
    The essence of Bolton's speech: - "Let's be friends against China, because it is our enemy. It threatens us economically, stepping on our heels. If you, with your military might, are in one with China, then we will not be able to cope with it! debts must be repaid ... but I really don't want to. Therefore, we'd better stir up the war ... "
  14. Sailor
    Sailor 26 October 2018 20: 40
    +3
    Starina Bolton is so worried about us, protects him even against evil Chinese - already touching, that’s what the partner means! crying From the British with the French too protect?
  15. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 26 October 2018 20: 41
    +1
    It would be interesting to look at the face of this chatterbox, when he would be told "out of the USSR, yap"
  16. Special department
    Special department 26 October 2018 20: 41
    +7
    Chinese missiles threaten Russia. The heart of Russia is in the zone of destruction of these missiles of Beijing.

    This is all our liberalism is constantly drumming into us in "their media"
    The main enemy of Russia is China and other Asians .. bully
    And then we know them by sight (many are secretive ..))

    They stayed, the Smolensky killer and the thief went quietly and the like ..
    Open your eyes Russia!
  17. Radikal
    Radikal 26 October 2018 20: 44
    +1
    Quote: Fedorov
    The guarantor didn’t give a damn about giving Damansky Island to the Chinese!

    There is such garbage - its size for udine shock battery MLRS. My opinion is that Russia does not need it. BUT!
    By agreement, China has withdrawn ALL heavy weapons from the border with Russia by 200 km, and Russia by 60 km. There are only border guards. And they sacredly observe this agreement. Maybe the "guarantor did not" spit at all?

    The question is not in size, but in principle, and in the precedent! If it is possible to give away a piece of land drenched in the blood of our soldiers, and this was "swallowed" in the Russian Federation, then next time it will be possible to give a piece of land more and fatter! This is how it looks! sad As for the assigned weapons to some ridiculous distances, this is not even worth discussing! hi
  18. 1536
    1536 26 October 2018 20: 46
    +2
    It was necessary to put a straitjacket on him in Moscow. Grandfather was completely stunned by impunity.
  19. parusnik
    parusnik 26 October 2018 20: 56
    +1
    Chinese missiles threaten Russia. The heart of Russia is in the zone of destruction of these missiles of Beijing.
    ... One thing is not clear why Bolton is telling the Georgians, found free ears ..?
  20. GibSoN
    GibSoN 26 October 2018 20: 57
    -2
    Why does the author attribute news, his fantasies and desires? This is a news section and not opinions! Key in the news, 100500% true! No matter who you would like to. For a long time there is no USSR and those USA that opposed that USSR. At the moment, there is China! Which one way or another, in one form or another, opposes both the Russian Federation and the United States. And this is a fact that not one expert can challenge!
  21. keeper03
    keeper03 26 October 2018 20: 57
    +2
    Bolton decided to eliminate the competitor with our hands ?! yes You won’t get a damn thing, stupid Americans! wassat
    In all the world's troubles, only you are to blame - the Americans! am Death has long been missing you! angry soldier
  22. Fedorov
    Fedorov 26 October 2018 20: 57
    +5
    Yes, in life, China and the USSR would not quarrel, if not for the famous congress of the party, where Khrushch Stalin had not blamed for all sins. (although he signed the execution lists himself), and the party elite just put a finger from the priests into the nose (maybe vice versa). And China opposed such an opinion - and raced ...
    1. GibSoN
      GibSoN 26 October 2018 21: 08
      -1
      Yes, in life, China and the USSR would not quarrel
      How can you write something like that in your right mind ?! Of course, we wouldn’t quarrel if China had been licked before, just as now, ... You are extremely far from sober logic and common sense! Not to mention the economy. China is developing. He needs fresh blood, new markets, new labor force. This is obvious! 20 years ago, in China, they worked for a bowl of rice. Now, they work there for a salary comparable to that in Moscow! But China continues to develop. He needs a cheaper slave power than his own. Yes, and their own have already grown up to plow themselves. Such a tidbit in every sense as the Russian Federation, and even a neighbor! To which you don't need to swim, travel, fly anywhere too far .. Moreover, he has literally everything, all 101% necessary for further development ... What could be better for China than the Russian Federation ?! Or do you really think that it is more profitable and easier for China to "capture" Europe or the United States for its further development? How can such nonsense be discussed at all! This is so obvious that even the blind-deaf-mute will notice.
      1. Fedorov
        Fedorov 26 October 2018 21: 40
        +2
        What a sensible Chinese would climb into the cold taiga, while getting a club on the head (or even a nuclear one) if there is anything in the South of Og! And no one but the mattress paskudniki.
        Read somehow more attentively. YES YOU even imagine HOW they plow in Chinese cities for days and a half a year, sleep at work, huddled in slums, so that they could later send their families to the Village. Where is the little son, as in the pioneer camp under the USSR, wakes up to the anthem of China, in the barracks in the truest sense of the word.
        In-at least rummage. China is big. And the difference is huge in income. It’s like in Moscow and somewhere around 500 km from Tyumen, where it takes 13 hours to go to the paradise center on a broken dirt road.
        1. Dikson
          Dikson 27 October 2018 09: 01
          0
          In the cold taiga, there’s already dofiga and more Chinese .. who successfully cut down and take this coldest taiga with their motorized brigades of the latest technology ... One and a half weeks - this is the real time China will need to get to the Urals. Moscow, of course, didn’t give up to them, and Muscovites are stupid, scattered eternally hungry Siberian and Far Eastern settlements .. I think they’ll agree, if they don’t need the help of the Americans .. Anything south of Lake Baikal burns every year? China will never shoot rockets in Siberia — they still have to live and work there .. But in the European part it could be very much .. I already wrote here, just arithmetic: if in a military conflict with the People's Republic of China to kill Chinese soldiers on DAY, fight with they will have about three years - four .. Every day - a million ... You can quack as much as you like and rely on several nuclear warheads - also .. But if anything, the Chinese will simply trample everyone like locusts or a huge flock of sheep - and leave them for a desert.
    2. Dr.KonradMorgen
      Dr.KonradMorgen 27 October 2018 01: 19
      -1
      Yes, in life, China and the USSR would not quarrel, if not for the famous congress of the party

      I do not agree. The conflict between China and the USSR was objectively determined. A reason would be found.
  23. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 26 October 2018 21: 03
    +1
    Trump's adviser: Chinese missiles are tagged to the very heart of Russia

    And in China, they are so stupid that they do not understand US policy - to pit, divide and destroy one by one. China should be more concerned about the United States itself, as a full and potential leader in the global economy. There is nothing better than undermining the established ties between Russia and China. Well, go for it ...
  24. rocket757
    rocket757 26 October 2018 21: 06
    0
    Chinese missiles threaten Russia. The heart of Russia is in the zone of destruction of these missiles of Beijing.

    Mutual annihilation, to the delight of the third (it is very doubtful that anyone will be able to rejoice at all) does not need anyone. Against two, no one can resist, but anyone can slam the door LOUDLY!
    Empty chatter, because all the central ones know and understand this.
  25. Terenin
    Terenin 26 October 2018 21: 26
    +5
    Almost nothing has changed in history.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. Prisoner
    Prisoner 26 October 2018 21: 45
    +1
    Here is the serpent! And then the arrow translates.
  28. Cannonball
    Cannonball 26 October 2018 22: 11
    +1
    You might think that Chinese missiles are not aimed at the heart of the states.
    You'd better think about your safety, "mad professor".
  29. mmk
    mmk 26 October 2018 22: 28
    +2
    Here you are in Russia constantly violating the agreement, and China is aiming at you, which you are not good Russians. Only the states are white and fluffy and smell like flowers.
  30. Radikal
    Radikal 26 October 2018 22: 46
    +1
    Quote: Tersky
    Quote: Radikal
    The guarantor didn’t give a damn about giving Damansky Island to the Chinese!

    Well, yes ... he is the guarantor, where else to put it ... request . Speech on transfer about. Damansky entered on 20 on October 1969 in negotiations between the heads of government of the USSR and China, where they managed to reach an agreement on the need to revise the Soviet-Chinese border. Damansky Island moved to China in 1991. And under what matters is the guarantor incomprehensible to me ... what

    Well, yes, you took this information out of Wikipedia, only there for some reason "kept silent" that the agreement on the transfer of the island was ratified much later, under the Guarantor! And, for information, Wikipedia is often edited by some pseudo-histories, with a very specific purpose, to mislead users on certain issues of history, politics, and economics. sad
  31. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 26 October 2018 23: 14
    +2
    Trump's adviser: Chinese missiles are tagged to the very heart of Russia

    Is he trying to quarrel China and Russia with this nonsense?
  32. Wizzzard
    Wizzzard 26 October 2018 23: 49
    -2
    Advisor to the President of the United States for National Security John Bolton continues his tour of the post-Soviet space.

    The fact that the United States is actively working to "distribute" Russia and China (many have already written about this), to pit our countries against each other is quite logical and sensible from the point of view of the United States. The United States' biggest problem is China. Why not toss Russian coal into the furnace?

    But for me on Bolton's visit there were much more unpleasant moments (to be honest, even frightening). Surely many of you have seen him rendezvous with Putin (i.e., access to journalists and an easy warm-up).

    So I saw two people, one of whom was obviously twitching, every second he pressed a miserable smile out of himself, twisted his shoulders with a tent, and awkwardly joked, once running into a very tough answer. Anyone not even a psychologist, but simply a person with life experience, will tell you that this behavior clearly betrayed the frightened individual. (Yes, Body Language. It's hard to lie here. It reads who lost the battle before entering the ring.)

    And his companion was sitting with an icy (or poker, someone that you like more) facial expression and did not react to the flirting of his counterpart.

    It is not necessary to explain who was individual number one and who was individual number two. And if the behavior of Number Two was quite expected, then Number One was, I repeat, scary to look at. Where is the self-confidence of the type of exits to the closest people through the gates of the St. George Hall - waddling, with "sentries" from the amusing regiments, of which Petrusha the third fit to have - where did that go? Was this the man who flew at the head of the wedge of Siberian Cranes, took the pike with his bare hands and snapped the tigers on the nose? Where did it all go all of a sudden?

    Blown away ...

    Only remains the main question: why blown away? Maybe because not everything is so super-duper cool in real life? Maybe the reality is looking through in the case of the pilot - starley Sergei Nefedov, who was put on trial because of car damage (Su-27p) during landing? The case, like, neither to Bolton, nor even to Putin any sideways, but in the appeal of AVVAKUL veterans (among the signatories are very, very respected people, professionals, such as Honored Pilot of Russia, Major General Viktor Fisul), there are moments which answer if not from Bolton, so GlavSterkh should be. Here is what veterans write in their letter:

    ““ For us it has always been and is an axiom that an error must be perceived as a normal component of any system in which people and equipment interact ... ”reads the appeal of AVVAKUL veterans, signed by Honored Pilot of Russia Major General Viktor Fisun and dozens of other reserve officers "What is the pilot's fault? What is the judge for? For 22 hours of flight in five years?"

    One more time: "For 22 hours of flight in five years?" (And this address was not made by Navalny with Sobchachka - look at the names and merits of the people who signed it, but at the same time assess the degree of their awareness.)

    Maybe that's why the Supreme Commander was so nervous - and Bolton didn't sweat a dime - that THAT side is well aware of the real reality (that is, not TVshno-Solovyov's)? How are our real strategic "peremogi" in Syria known, and our (our government's) total inability (or inability) to respond to spitting in the face with a punch in the face of an opponent, even if this rival is not the States, but only Poroshenko's junta?

    What is the bottom line? Yes, something that has become very uncomfortable. Or indeed we (and not only us, but also THEIR) treated us with cartoons, (and we bought, and THEY did not), or we still have everything we need, but there is no real man at the helm ...

    And if in reality we have the second option, then after all, it does not inspire. An ancient saying, but true: a flock of sheep commanded by a lion is much more powerful than a flock of lions under the direction of a sheep.
  33. mvd ru
    mvd ru 26 October 2018 23: 55
    +1
    China is our temporary ally, they gouge if we are the first, then they take it, or vice versa, you can think, write, say 100 times that our allies are army and navy, but in real DB we will not pull against all western and some eastern countries, we need albeit temporary, but allies, and nuclear weapons are not a panacea, you can hit the states, but how many of their military bases are around the world, and that everything is on target? and if at gunpoint, then where are the guarantees that all ICBMs will reach the target by 100%, how many failures in space and in the military-industrial complex can happen, exercises are exercises, but at an hour "X" ...
  34. MKPU-115
    MKPU-115 27 October 2018 00: 18
    +2
    "Trump's advisor: Chinese missiles are targeting the very heart of Russia" - yeah, divide and rule. laughing
    Chinese missiles are aiming at the very heart of the USA !!!
  35. HUNTERDON
    HUNTERDON 27 October 2018 00: 38
    0
    Unfortunately, it’s time for Lavrov to resign
    1. asv363
      asv363 27 October 2018 01: 20
      0
      Vitaly, what is Lavrov doing wrong?
      1. iouris
        iouris 27 October 2018 13: 24
        0
        And tell us what Lavrov is doing right? What was the goal, what are the results and what will happen in three years?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. iouris
      iouris 27 October 2018 13: 25
      0
      Explain why "unfortunately"? But the question is rhetorical: there will be no resignations, and the results of the "information war" can be read on the face.
  36. Russian
    Russian 27 October 2018 01: 28
    -1
    China is not interested in Russia as a market for sales. Just a small and poor population that consumes relatively little. Therefore, trade is mainly with the US and the EU. But the land of Siberia, China would be useful
  37. high
    high 27 October 2018 02: 15
    0
    Why should China target missiles at Russia, according to media reports, there are more Chinese than Russians in the Far East than Russians ...... they are peacefully seizing these lands.
    China believes that historically - these lands of China ....... a quiet enemy is the most dangerous.
    1. htmik
      htmik 27 October 2018 05: 47
      +1
      And you do not believe the media .. here you will see guests from the Central Asian republics more often than the Chinese. Especially after the collapse of the ruble in 2014. Now they don’t have much to do here, now on the contrary, they come here as tourists, relax, spend money. In industry, their percent is 10-20, more in agriculture, less in mining, in processing them practically none. Moreover, as a rule, the Chinese are leaders, and workers are increasingly migrant workers.
      It is easier for the Chinese to trade with us than to seize territories unsuitable for life. The north-east of China, which borders on us in the south, along with Tibet and the deserts in the north-west is considered the least developed region, just because of the severity of the climate, winter for five months, with annual frosts of -30.
  38. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 27 October 2018 03: 20
    -1
    In some ways, fascington is right-Asians should not be overlooked !!! It is good to remember - "Russian and Chinese brothers forever"! but Mao came and the result is Damansky !!! "Slowly, arming and not weakly, although there are no conflicts with anyone except with India, then the question is why !!! ???, again" to fight "with Vietnam? So the balance is not the same.
  39. APASUS
    APASUS 27 October 2018 09: 29
    +1
    Such a modest attempt by the Americans to quarrel the Russians and the Chinese, pulling China to the treaty between the two countries. Ours also would not be aloof and dragging the missile defense system or the sale of the F-35 to the treaty. All the same, the Americans decided to go out and come out
  40. Samara_63
    Samara_63 27 October 2018 09: 30
    0
    This is true ... Their throw to Moscow through Kazakhstan and Samara is also real, this direction for the PLA is more profitable than Siberia and Primorye ...
  41. ALEX_SHTURMAN
    ALEX_SHTURMAN 27 October 2018 10: 37
    0
    As always in his own style: whom the thread needs to be pitted! Nobody believes you Comrade Bolton in the World as before!
  42. sergo1914
    sergo1914 27 October 2018 10: 42
    0
    How is Guderian in Chinese?
    Just asked.
  43. fif21
    fif21 27 October 2018 13: 42
    0
    And he (Bolton) did not call for the purchase of Russian American weapons? laughing And all this fuss about withdrawing from the US treaty only says that it is impossible to sign any agreements with mattresses. As soon as it becomes unprofitable for them they tear it unilaterally. But Putin and Lavrov are still trying to sign something with them! fool
  44. fif21
    fif21 27 October 2018 13: 50
    0
    The USA itself pushed Russia into the "embrace" of the PRC. hi
  45. ilik54
    ilik54 27 October 2018 14: 05
    0
    And yours, what a dog thing for our relationship with China, an American dog?
  46. Dimmedroll
    Dimmedroll 27 October 2018 19: 19
    0
    Something a lot of articles went against China, apparently they want us to play off China and well, or to break ties. Wow, these journalists are ready to write any kind of analytics.
  47. mvnmln
    mvnmln 27 October 2018 20: 05
    0
    Without Bolton and the like "advisers" Russia will decide with whom and how to build its relations.