US media rated the Russian "smart" shell

38
State producer weapons concern "Tehmash" (part of Rostec) began to develop smart artillery shells caliber 152 mm, writes The National Interest.





The publication cites the words of the general director of the concern Alexander Kochkin, who said that the projectile performs most of its journey to the target along the usual ballistic trajectory, and only at the final stage (before the target) its control system is activated, which makes adjustments to the flight, thereby increasing the accuracy of hitting . The adjustment is made either by small jet engines or by means of installed wings. The CEO also noted that it is impossible to use the optical guidance system because of the large overloads caused by rotation - the picture will be blurred.

The author tries to guess how the ammunition will be aimed at the target. Usually a laser beam or GPS navigation is used for this (like the M155 Excalibur US 982-mm shell), and there are always fears that both of these methods can be blocked by the enemy, he notes.

Apparently, Russia takes a different approach. It is not excluded that the Russian designers invented a special optical system that is not afraid of the furious rotation of the projectile, the magazine believes.

Also, the publication is at a loss as to whether the projectile will be self-guided or its flight will be remotely controlled (with the help of a joystick) by the operator.

In addition, the author expressed confidence that the cost of the new Russian projectile will be lower than the cost of other guided munitions, such as Krasnopol, but much more expensive than conventional projectiles. For clarity, he cited an example from the American pricing policy: if an ordinary projectile today costs about $ 1 thousand, then the cost of the M2000 Excalibur 982 caliber of 155 mm created at the beginning of 68 is about $ XNUMX thousand.

Of course, Rostec is looking for a cheaper option, since “the Russian government has not allocated any funds for the project at all” - all work is being done at the expense of the company's internal reserves, the newspaper concludes.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    9 October 2018 17: 53
    The author is trying to guess how the ammunition will be aimed at the target.

    ) Type of demand for money do not take)))))))))))))))))))))))))
    1. +9
      9 October 2018 17: 56
      Quote: poquello
      The author is trying to guess how the ammunition will be aimed at the target.

      ) Type of demand for money do not take)))))))))))))))))))))))))

      laughing The author is waiting for our comments .. then in the USA he will sell sensational material .. well, let’s tell the adversary wassat
      1. +9
        9 October 2018 18: 40
        "The author is trying to guess how the ammunition will be aimed at the target."

        Elementary, like a shadow on the wattle fence. laughing
        1. +10
          9 October 2018 19: 01
          Not bad, they get tired of translating "shadow on the wattle" laughing
          1. 0
            9 October 2018 21: 13
            Usually, a laser beam or GPS navigation is used for this (like the American 155 mm shell M982 Excalibur), while there are always fears that both of these methods may be blocked by the enemy

            Who knows how to block a laser beam?
            I know only two ways - smoke and pointing a lot of false laser markers. But they are not effective. The smoke attenuates the battle laser well, but the guidance laser, although greatly attenuated, passes through the smoke. And against false markers, changing the wavelength of the guidance laser works, it is enough to make it different from false target designators.
            1. +1
              9 October 2018 21: 53
              Artificial gravity will deflect the beam in any direction. Joke.
              You can block the beam only with plasticine. But seriously, you can use the coherence of the waves - it should help ... but then again, you can then calmly aim at the source of interference .. In general, plasticine is the most laughing laughing laughing
            2. 0
              9 October 2018 23: 50
              Quote: Shurik70
              How can I block the laser beam?

              aerosol suspension is not smoke, the laser should have its own specialized composition
            3. +2
              10 October 2018 05: 27
              Aerosol counteraction is aimed at weakening the aiming laser; for this, the dispersed density and particle size of the so-called "smoke" are selected.
            4. The comment was deleted.
  2. -11
    9 October 2018 17: 54
    “The Russian government has not allocated any funds whatsoever for the project” ... Why do they need it ..?
    Oil is growing, everything in the west can be bought .. soldier
    1. +5
      9 October 2018 18: 09
      Lord ... where do you come from ...
  3. +5
    9 October 2018 17: 54
    Of course, Rostec is looking for a cheaper option, since “the Russian government has not allocated any funds for the project at all” - all work is being done at the expense of the company's internal reserves, the newspaper concludes.

    Well, yes ... you pant there, and then we'll see ... a story with the same T-90. In the beginning nafig nobody needed, except Potkin. And now, on all channels, UralVagonzavod is being exported.
  4. +6
    9 October 2018 17: 58
    A thousand bucks, Carl, A THOUSAND belay what one thousand green American tugriks costs 40 kg of iron, stuffed 3-4 kg fool !
    I have 4 (four, Karl) months to work on one projectile. This is if you do not eat and do not pay a communal apartment ...
    The finish... request laughing
    1. +5
      9 October 2018 18: 01
      Quote: Rurikovich
      The finish...

      Something tells me .. that is still far from the finish line recourse
    2. 0
      9 October 2018 18: 03
      Quote: Rurikovich
      I have 4 (four, Karl) months to work on one projectile.

      those. it’s only a shell’s job, but what do you already shoot from? wassat
      1. +1
        9 October 2018 19: 35
        found on the Internet:
        Name of ammunition Index Price per unit in rubles on 01.01.2005
        152 mm 2A65 and 2C19
        High-explosive fragmentation plant VOF72 13224,90
        High-explosive fragmentation s / p VOF58 10787,36
        High-explosive fragmentation f / z VOF73 9203,03
        High-explosive fragmentation plant VOF91 57931,00
        High-explosive fragmentation inert s / d VOF72 IN 12018,46
        High-explosive fragmentation inert s / p VOF58 IN 9582,36
        High explosive inert f / z VOF73 IN 7998,03

        So do not show off, save up for domestic high-explosive fragmentation caliber 152mm,
        and let the American taxpayers throw off a kilobax for a trick to their 155mm caliber ...
        1. BAI
          0
          9 October 2018 20: 11
          A baby in Soviet non-denominated rubles was worth 10. So what?
          1. 0
            10 October 2018 10: 30
            tell the teapot - what is called Baby?
    3. -1
      9 October 2018 18: 05
      You better estimate how much the ATGMs cost, which in Syria are sometimes spent on single barmalei, and your nails and itchy teeth will start to hurt winked
      1. -1
        9 October 2018 18: 12
        Sometimes it’s not a means to complete a task.
        1. +1
          9 October 2018 19: 03
          Quote: Bull Terrier
          Sometimes it’s not a means to complete a task.

          Yes, we have pensioners rich .. funds can not be considered ..
          1. +2
            9 October 2018 19: 42
            Quote: Svarog
            Yes, we have rich pensioners ..
            about the wealth of pensioners, who are an order of magnitude greater than the military, are well bent ...

            Quote: Svarog
            funds can not be considered ..

            the rich usually feel good ...
    4. +2
      9 October 2018 18: 07
      Quote: Rurikovich
      A thousand bucks, Karl, A THOUSAND thousand thousand green American tugriks costs 40 kg of iron, stuffed with 3-4 kg outers!

      Well done in Merikos !!!!! Where the budget is mastered. I do not know the price now, but in the USSR a shot cost 32 rubles. (chrome boots).
    5. +1
      9 October 2018 19: 12
      Well, claim your shell as part of public wealth. Pass it on to your children and grandchildren.
    6. -11
      9 October 2018 20: 48
      And me a couple of days, so what? Do not be ashamed at all, like a man, but you can’t make money?
      1. +6
        9 October 2018 21: 01
        Quote: NG inform
        Do not be ashamed at all, like a man, but you can’t make money?

        What do you have there, are all the managers of "Gazprom", the earner? wink And nobody needs to turn the steering wheels, or to build houses. It does everything itself, "man"? smile
        1. -4
          10 October 2018 11: 40
          I am a man, yes. It’s unpleasant for me, animals, to look at you - you only know how to whine and tell you how poor you are, as if there is something good in this.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    7. 0
      10 October 2018 19: 23
      Quote: Rurikovich
      A thousand bucks, Carl, A THOUSAND belay what one thousand green American tugriks costs 40 kg of iron, stuffed 3-4 kg fool !
      I have 4 (four, Karl) months to work on one projectile. This is if you do not eat and do not pay a communal apartment ...
      The finish... request laughing

      Sell ​​your howitzer to neighbors and shells will not be needed. From the word in general.
  5. 0
    9 October 2018 18: 06
    What difference does it make? laughing be healthy "suitcase."
  6. +5
    9 October 2018 18: 09
    Infa for American media: On approaching a target, oars stick out from the projectile (on the sides) and a keel comes out from below. And inside the projectile - Petrov and Boshirov row with oars and steer the projectile towards the target. INFA is top secret !!
    1. 0
      9 October 2018 19: 03
      National Interest is not the American media.
    2. +1
      9 October 2018 19: 05
      Well, you’ve made it very complicated, in fact, they, who Petrov and Bashirov, order a taxi for the shell, put the check in an incombustible capsule, because he is needed
      for reporting and then only undermining a taxi for jeepies or glonassa, and here you oars a bumblebee, you don’t understand anything in tactics hi soldier drinks wassat laughing
  7. 0
    9 October 2018 18: 56
    it is not clear why the optical system rotates with the projectile. As if independent suspensions for compensation of rotation does not exist. And if you’re also an eccentric, then you can see while the projectile is flying, then the rotation of the optics will be reduced to almost zero.
  8. 0
    9 October 2018 19: 18
    “The Russian government has not allocated any funds at all for the project” - all work is carried out at the expense of the company's internal reserves

    Beauty! What the hell of import substitution, the rearmament of the army in response to global threats. The development of digital technology, if the government is interested only in the dust, olympiads, rallies, summits and bridges are of great interest
  9. BAI
    0
    9 October 2018 20: 08
    In the United States have already made a homing bullet. Yes - 10000 bucks, but falls on 3-4 thousand meters and for exceptional tasks no money is a pity.
  10. +5
    9 October 2018 22: 16
    The tests of the smart bomb ended in complete failure.

    The crew did not manage to persuade the smart bomb to leave the plane.

    laughing
  11. 0
    9 October 2018 23: 13
    Quote: Rurikovich
    A thousand bucks, Carl, A THOUSAND thousand thousand green American tugriks

    At such prices ... not surprisingly, I have exceeded the budget of the Pentagon for 700 lard ...
    1. 0
      10 October 2018 03: 05
      "The Navy will drag our entire army to the bottom" - one of the "ground" American generals spoke about the costs of the fleet. hi
  12. 0
    10 October 2018 09: 15
    The laser beam can be used within line of sight (backlight), it is 3-5 km, but how do you apply it to a distance, for example, 15-20 km? In my opinion, they have not yet learned to reject it (go around the horizon). Are you mounting a laser in the ammunition itself? Here, you’ll hardly be able to meet 100 thousand dollars, and it’s unlikely that you will squeeze this device into the dimensions of the projectile. There remains a map of the area, i.e. JPP or backlight from an airplane, satellite, drone. All the same, you cannot do without a monitoring device.