Far from coincidence! What did the British RC-135W catch under the guise of the “Ukrainian throw” into the Sea of ​​Azov?

27
With a great deal of undisguised curiosity, the knowledgeable observers of "VO", as well as others news and the military-analytical resources of Runet monitored the situation with the so-called campaign of two Ukrainian surface ships (the search and rescue ship A500 Donbass and the sea tug A830 Korets) through the 200-mile economic zone of Russia, stretching 370,4 km deep into the Black seas from the western and southern coasts of Crimea. Naturally, a much more unpredictable shade and negative acuteness of what was happening was given by the inadequate actions already implemented by the Ukrainian law enforcement agencies against the fishing vessel "Nord" and the motor ship "Mechanic Pogodin", on the basis of which many provocative scenarios of the development of the situation in the Black Sea could be built.





Fortunately, this time common sense prevailed, and the "horses" of the barely showing signs of life of the Navy had the intelligence not to raise the degree of tension. However, this argument is not entirely appropriate in this situation, since the command of the Navy clearly fulfills the orders received through the "Ukrainian top" from the US defense department and NATO headquarters in Brussels. And this time, obviously, the command of the Navy “independent” was given the go-ahead for the usual demonstration passage by the sea, excluding provocative actions. Of course, the naval auxiliary vessels, drawn off the coast of the Republic of Crimea, sufficiently amused even those observers who were not strong in matters of naval equipment parameters. Meanwhile, when at the very last moment it became known that Ukrainian vessels leaving the Western Navy in Odessa were slowly but surely heading towards the Kerch-Yenikalsky Canal with further passage to the waters of the Sea of ​​Azov, numerous resources exploded with angry comments from readers condemning the Black Sea admission fleet and the Coast Guard of the Border Service of the FSB of Russia of the Ukrainian surface component to the "backyard" of the Southern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces.

This is not surprising, since the memory of the most patriotic cell of our population preserved the creation of the Operational Group by the Azov-Black Sea Territorial Administration (APPT) of the Russian Fishery to prevent piracy from Ukraine, as well as an asymmetric response to the seizure of “Nord”, expressed in many hours inspection of ships bound for the ports of Mariupol and Berdyansk. This time the ships of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy (medium reconnaissance ship SSV-201 “Priazovye”, tugboat SB-739, etc.) and ships of the Bokhr SS of the FSB of Russia (patrol ship / small corvette, etc. 22640 “Amethyst” and high-speed PCs Ave 03160 "Raptor") limited to only escort "ancient" representatives of the so-called Ukrainian fleet.

For alarmistly-minded observers and administrators of some VKontakte communities, for example, “The Raccoons of Novorossiya”, this was a good reason for catching Moscow allegedly “unwilling to confront the Navy of Ukraine against the background of a possible tightening of sanctions from Washington”. Again, the defensive charges under the unshakable military and political line of the West were sent to the Russian Defense Ministry. The information that “Donbass” and “Korets” are sent to the ports of Mariupol and Berdyansk for the construction of a naval infrastructure in the Northern Azov region, added fuel to the fire, which is why resourceful alarmists immediately noted that “Moscow creates its own hands shaft of the most difficult problems. " We will not hide the fact that the admission of “Donbass” and “Korets” into the water area of ​​the Sea of ​​Azov is not the best decision of Moscow in the current military-political situation.

However, let's take a look at the situation in a different plane. First of all, it should be noted that the Donbass search and rescue ship / control ship sailed into the Azov Sea (this classification was received in the “independent” floating workshop PM-9, 304 Ave., which became part of the Black Sea Fleet on September 30 of the year 1970) was carried out with the aim of provoking retaliation by the Black Sea Fleet and Coast Guard Army of the FSB of Russia, which should have been expressed in the detention and verification of A-500, either on the way to the Kerch-Yenikalsky Canal, or already in the Azov Sea. Such a turn of events would have turned for Kiev into an excellent reason to accuse the Russian side of violating international maritime law, as well as the Russian-Ukrainian agreement on the joint use of the Sea of ​​Azov. It is logical that Moscow decided not to resort to the practice of our inadequate neighbor. At the same time, everybody is perfectly aware that any attempt to aggravate the situation in the Azov Sea region is fraught for the “Square” at best with the destruction of all that “scrap metal” that is being transferred to the Taganrog Bay area, and at worst - the loss of new territories of Donetsk, Zaporozhye and Kherson areas. And therefore we advise all alarmists to calm down, be patient and wait for the outcome, which is just around the corner.

In light of the modern Russian 3 flywheel of the highly maneuverable 3М54Е anti-ship missiles of the Caliber-NK family with a range of 220 km and an 10 flying height in the Russian military, diplomatic sources about the construction of Berdyansk military and military sources on the construction of Berdyansk military-maritime sources about the construction of Berdyansk military-maritime sources about the construction of Berdyansk military-maritime sources about the construction of Berdyansk military-maritime sources about the construction of Berdyansk military-maritime sources about the construction of Berdyansk military-maritime sources about the construction of Berdyansk military-maritime sources about the construction of Berdyansk military-maritime sources for the military-maritime security forces Also, “using A-500 as a command-staff ship and a floating base of armored boats” looks no different than another marasmic strategy from representatives of Ukrainian defense structures. And even if we take into account the presence at the disposal of the Ukrainian Armed Forces of two or three anti-aircraft missile divisions C-300PS deployed between Mangush and Volodarsky, the alignment of forces remains virtually unchanged, since, first, the surface shares of the Sea of ​​Azov do not fall The 30H6E radar guidance sector is well located in the viewing sector because of the overlap of the elevated terrain of the northern coast of the Sea of ​​Azov with a screen, secondly, due to the minimum height of the target to be hit in 25 m, while the flight paths are anti-ship in Ariant "Caliber" and subsonic X-35U are at a height of 4 — 10 m.

Against the background of the APU’s lack of high-precision rocket armament capable of posing a significant threat to the maneuverable Russian Mongoose patrol boats, Ukrainian cannon and rocket artillery batteries transferred to Obitochnaya Spit area along the M14 highway (Odessa-Melitopol-Mariupol) are trying to play muscles before the Coastal guarding the Border Guard Service of the FSB of Russia, shelling “Grads”, “Hurricanes” and “Peonies” the territorial waters in the Sea of ​​Azov, information about which was received on the evening of September 26. But everybody is perfectly aware of the magnitude of the consequences for Kiev, which will follow if the militants of the junta miraculously manage to harm the FSM of Russia’s FSM or merchant ships heading for Rostov-on-Don.

Much more questions raise another moment in the whole of this epic with the transfer of Ukrainian ships to the Sea of ​​Azov. Neither the central news channels nor any other informational and analytical sources reported about it. Speech on the reconnaissance mission of the aircraft strategic radio engineering and electronic intelligence RC-135W "Rivet Joint" c onboard number "Z666" of the Royal Air Force of Great Britain, which hitherto was not a frequent guest in neutral airspace near the south-western borders of the Southern Military District, in particular, the Republic Crimea. Usually, the British “Rivets Joint” carry out reconnaissance of radio-emitting objects of the Russian Armed Forces (calculating DRLO radar operation modes, radar, target and target radar radar, counter-battery radar and with varying success decrypting protected tactical radio communication channels), especially in Kaliningrad, Leningrad and Pskov areas. After all, the Baltic operational direction has traditionally been the most complex part of the European theater, abounding in the most complex army network-centric means of data exchange, as well as the most advanced echeloned air defense system.

The upgrading of the coastal missile brigades of the Black Sea Fleet by the Bastion-P anti-ship complexes and anti-ship missile regiments of the VKS systems C-400 in the Crimea and the Krasnodar Territory were usually watched by the American Rivet Jounds and anti-submarine strategic reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles RQ-YNT-Ynt. Global Hawk using SYERS-B / C ultra-zoom ultra-zoom cameras and side-facing AF / AIR radar AN / ZPY-4.

Since 20 September 2018, the British RC-135W has become a regular in the sky over the Black Sea, which clearly coincided with the transition of Ukrainian ships through the exclusive economic zone of Russia. This is indicated by the data of the tactical online map syria.liveuamap.com. And this only once again confirms that an absolutely disastrous idea of ​​creating a naval infrastructure of Naval Forces in Berdyansk or Mariupol with the involvement of Donbass and Korets is only a fake from the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the purpose of which was to distract from the reconnaissance operation agreed with London and analysis of radio-emitting means of the Russian group of troops in the Republic of Crimea.

It is most likely that the British were interested in the frequency ranges and modes of operation of various means of exchanging tactical information of the Black Sea Fleet and the BOHR PS of the FSB of Russia, as well as the methods of encrypting the signal of these funds. For these purposes, on board the British Rivet Joint modification there is not only a standard 85000 / ES-182 MUCELS (Multiple Communications Emitter Location System) multi-range electronic intelligence system, which can detect and analyze radio-emitting means (radio stations and data exchange terminals between different combat units and CP) in the range from 40 MHz to 17250 MHz at a distance of up to 900 km (depending on the radio horizon), but also the fundamentally new QinetiQ Tigershark 2 RER complex, which has no open information on the parameters to this day. It is logical that in this case, the Ukrainian surface ships Donbass and Korets acted as baits, which, in accordance with the tactical situation, were supposed to “jam” the air with a mass of cipher programs and radio channels of communication (protected by the frequency hopping mode) between Russian surface ships, anti-submarine aviation and the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet. To work with the "complex ether" on board the RC-135W there is an on-duty shift of 9 cryptologists-linguists.


Radar complex "Monolith-B"


The second target for the British aircraft "Rivet Joint" could be the radar complexes of over-the-horizon detection, tracking and targeting of the Monolith-B, attached to the K-300P Bastion-P mobile coastal anti-ship missile systems. The importance of this radar lies in the fact that in the absence of the necessary airborne targeting equipment (for example, the anti-submarine IL-38H equipped with the aiming-search complex "Novella") due to the diversion to another section of the theater or the loss of "Monolith-B" provides a point combat control of the K-380P anti-ship battalion K-300P with comprehensive information about a remote over-horizon target, which is usually sufficient for targeting 2,3-fly-flying anti-ship onyx 3М55. This unique radar is capable of detecting enemy surface ships at a distance of 250 km (without opening its own location) in the passive mode of the RTR. In this case, the British could be interested in the active mode of the "Monolith-B", which allows detecting NATO KVG OVMS in the south-western part of the Black Sea at a record distance of 450 km. Ukrainian ships could also be used as bait.

Determining the frequency parameters of the active mode of this radar would allow the British “BAE Systems” to begin upgrading existing ones or developing promising ship-based EW tools at least to cover their destroyers Type 45 “Daring” and perspective frigates Type 26 “Global Combat Ship” from trans-horizon detection literally immediately after leaving the Bosphorus. What is this London for?

The answer is easy to extract from a long chronological chain. It has long been known that the main players of the North Atlantic Alliance are preparing to the fullest an operational-strategic reserve for future escalation scenarios with the involvement of Russia in all operational areas of the European theater of operations. London is also observing its interests. This clearly manifested itself in a slightly unbalanced and doubtful Russophobe, head of the British defense department Gavin Williamson, and corroborated information about the start of the Black Sea patrols of the Royal Sea Infantry patrons of the Black Sea Army in the front-line Kramatorsk (the city-headquarters of the Ukrainian military formations in the Donbass theater), and corroborating information about the beginning of the Black Sea patrols of the Royal Sea Infantry patrons 2019 year. Moreover, Williamson rather unexpectedly announced the reinforcement of the presence of British naval ships in the Black Sea, predicting the coming blocking of the port of Odessa by our Black Sea Fleet. Obviously, the rudiment of colonial thinking, firmly entrenched in the minds of the British establishment, will still have to be beaten out in effective ways that the Southern Military District has.

Information sources:
http://nevskii-bastion.ru/rc-135w/
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/425579.html
http://www.aif.ru/politics/world/podvig_donbassa_chto_stoit_za_pohodom_korabley_vmsu_v_azovskoe_more
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/c300ps/c300ps.shtml
https://www.rusdialog.ru/world/157674_1537622473
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    27 September 2018 06: 26
    It was immediately evident that ukrov was kicked out on a hike, like that still bug in the cold smileall painfully ridiculous it all looked.
  2. +6
    27 September 2018 06: 36
    Send living people to a provocation that could result in the death of people. Although it seems ridiculous for us, they are bold. Unfortunately, sooner or later they will have to be forced, they don’t pour millions of euros into them to pay for this garbage as a passage of two troughs under the bridge.
    1. 0
      3 October 2018 02: 43
      sent 23-year-old boys - boat commanders, nationally preoccupied - who fled from "Nakhimovka" in 2014, when the Crimea and this school returned to Russia, and trained by NATO
      https://www.ukrmilitary.com/2018/10/kremenchuk.html
  3. +3
    27 September 2018 07: 56
    Neither the central news television channels, nor any other information and analytical sources reported about it.

    "X-Files" Yes
    ... a British intelligence officer with tail number ZZZ 666 flew from the Suda Bay air base on the Greek island of Crete, reports "Interfax". The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported that over the week, 37 foreign aircraft conducted reconnaissance at the borders of Russia. Russian fighters from the air defense duty forces rose to intercept 13 times. There were no violations of the airspace of the Russian Federation.

    https://iz.ru/792103/2018-09-23/samolet-britanskikh-vvs-provel-mnogochasovuiu-razvedku-u-beregov-kryma
    1. +1
      27 September 2018 13: 31
      Quote: thinker
      ... British reconnaissance aircraft with tail number ZZZ 666 took off from the Souda Bay airbase on the Greek island of Crete, Interfax reports. The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported that 37 foreign aircraft were conducting reconnaissance near the borders of Russia in a week. Russian fighters from the air defense on-duty forces climbed to intercept 13 times. There were no violations of the airspace of the Russian Federation.

      It turns out that in just 1 (one) week, 37 (thirty seven) flights of enemy reconnaissance flights were completed at our borders. And not one of them was shot down, not even a drone? The mess, however.
      1. 0
        28 September 2018 09: 58
        Quote: asv363
        And not one of them was shot down, not even a drone? The mess, however.

        Yes, no order! And where were you at this time? Why admit?
        1. -1
          29 September 2018 07: 41
          Quote: You Vlad
          Yes, no order! And where were you at this time? Why admit?

          At that time I was in Moscow. I admitted - absolutely due to the fact that there is a concept of "subordination". Alas, I'm not a pilot. Would be on the spot - would have demolished their reconnaissance plane to hell. But, I repeat again - I have 0 hours of flight time. If they could get it from the ground, it was necessary to shoot it down and not look whether this is our airspace according to intergovernmental agreements. I am ready to take responsibility.
      2. 0
        29 September 2018 10: 26
        Quote: asv363
        And not one of them was shot down, not even a drone? The mess, however.

        If they did not violate our air border, then there was no reason to shoot them down - we ourselves constantly fly along the coast of America.
        1. -1
          29 September 2018 11: 32
          Israelis and Americans, along with the British, violate the borders of other states and bomb. knock down whoever they want. Is it not clear that justice and the observance of norms and rights have long been violated and broken by all opponents of the Russian Federation. To this and acting according to the old fair norms, the Russian Federation will be the loser, because the opponents play not according to fair, but vile rules ... It is necessary to shoot down such "uninvited guests", only do it cunningly (in Israeli). under cover and various bases and other things, -. why not shoot down this small-shaven, who has flown into the wrong diocese, the S-200 "Ukrainian spill" or some other "accidental" collision with a UAV. etc.......
          1. 0
            29 September 2018 11: 44
            Quote: Vladimir 5
            It is necessary to shoot down such "uninvited guests", only to do it cunningly (in Israeli). under cover and various bases and other things, -. why not shoot down this small-shaven, who has flown into the wrong diocese, the S-200 "Ukrainian spill" or some other "accidental" collision with a UAV. etc.......

            And the simple thought that they would shoot down our strategic bomber off the coast of America or Great Britain, for example, in a similar way? And then, start a nuclear war? You would first weigh all the possible consequences of such actions by two nuclear powers with strategic bombers, and then make dubious proposals. Syria is a completely different "song" ...
            1. -1
              29 September 2018 17: 24
              tsssr - And both our planes and nuclear submarines are being drowned, and nuclear submarines being repaired with nuclear weapons are burning with the possibility of a nuclear explosion near a million city and none of the enemies are afraid ...... For example, the Tu-154 catastrophe with the Aleksandrov ensemble, which is significant for the consequences. on the eve of the holiday ... A catastrophe of political significance, only the traces of the perpetrators are not visible, and the conclusions of the commissions are still not clear. Moreover, the United States, at the request of the Polish government, was analyzing the possibilities of adjusting the disaster of the Polish Tu-154 and gained many options for the disasters of the Tu-154 without traces of impact. And it’s GREAT that the developments have been applied, and that further Do not scare those, which will not happen ...... ..T
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +5
    27 September 2018 08: 34
    two Ukrainian surface ships

    These are the vessels of the auxiliary fleet, Evgeny. "Donbass" is not a search and rescue ship (the ship cannot be a search and rescue ship), but a floating workshop (PM pr. 304). A ship is a combat unit.
    Thank you!
    1. +7
      27 September 2018 12: 33
      Both Donbas and Korets were handed over by Ukrainian crews under the St. Andrew's flag in March 2014. It’s in vain that the crews took this action for the sake of the people of Crimea - the Kremlin officials soon returned these auxiliary vessels to Ukraine. The expediency in this then, of course, was - political - but now the Crimean sailors must be protected from the Ukrainians, they are now under articles for life. Even then, it was known for sure that the Ukrainian Navy would serve as a provocateur on the orders of NATO.
      1. 0
        27 September 2018 16: 27
        Quote: Mikhail Zubkov
        The Ukrainian Navy will serve as a provocateur on orders from NATO.

        Ukraine does not have a fleet. They have a navy - naval forces. hi
        1. +2
          28 September 2018 07: 54
          Quote: hohkn
          They have a navy - naval forces.

          In former times, in Sevastopol it was called the Naval Forces laughing , where uk stands for the Naval-Forces of Ukraine ...... In the Sevastopol press they wrote - "And now we report on the events on VMsuk" laughing
          ...
  6. +4
    27 September 2018 10: 27
    If this is indeed so (apparently it is), then Bandera themselves would not have thought of such a thing.
    Syria, Ukraine, and now Afghan again - these are links in the same chain. I will probably repeat myself, but the beneficiaries of these processes are known - the USA, England. The goal is the same as in Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran (if possible) - to destroy the state from within, provoke the outbreak of a civil war, and bring to power their "vassals". That will facilitate the acquisition of natural (and other) resources and their use for their own purposes. And all this fuss with Ukraine, the Skripals, NATO's advance to the east, the encirclement of our country with US bases, whining about the Kuril Islands testifies only to one thing - our country is the main and final goal of this whole presumptuous international gang of bandits.
    Someone might say: "Paranoia! .."
    It is good to...
  7. +3
    27 September 2018 11: 51
    Williamson quite unexpectedly announced the strengthening in the Black Sea of ​​the presence of ships of the British Navy"...

    Mdaaaa .... everything is numb to the Britons .... History is developing in a spiral fashion ... Again, they wanted the latest intervention? At a new round of historical development, the outcome of the battle for Crimea for the Britons is likely to be negative, negative ...

    PS And where did the naglitsy only take such freaks to the iconic posts of the Prime Minister, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Minister of Defense ..... Whatever the personality, it's just a masterpiece !!! lol
  8. +1
    27 September 2018 12: 18
    Quote: denart50
    everything is numb to the Britons .... History develops in a spiral fashion ... Again they wanted the latest intervention

    ... And the newest "luli".
    SOS bored Anglo SOS ...
  9. +5
    27 September 2018 13: 37
    The article is somehow muddy .. It seems that the author gives an assessment of the passage of Ukrainian ships from the Black Sea to the Sea of ​​Azov, and uses the correct military terms, but there remains the sediment of a permanent Terpila (RF) and justification of the actions of the government (or certain groups in the government) with fairy tales, and drives of various scenarios: - what the Ukrainians wanted, what the Western curators of Ukraine wanted. as we did not give in to the next provocation, a weak adversary, and showed how wise we are, etc. .. !! TIME ALREADY To finish these blah, blah, blah, and in the media, and in the government, and in the State Duma, and in the Soviets .... The only right decision on the part of RUSSIA. The Russian Federation should have been: Stop the advancement of these vessels in the economic zone of the Russian Federation !!! This is the main thing. Stop, and let these glands hang on the raid until the Government of Ukraine, officially through its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ask to let them pass through the strait !!! And even in this case (since it is not a merchant fleet, but a military fleet of the state of Ukraine), our Foreign Ministry should set the conditions for passage through our waters of the Navy, the liberation of the NORD and MECHANIC ships .. Only in this case could Russia miss military vessels, I emphasize - Ukrainian military vessels through its waters .. This is the international practice of military and armed confrontation between countries. And if Ukraine, at all hearing and at the UN, EU, and other venues, announced that it is fighting and is opposing an armed attack on Russia. That such a step should be logical on the part of Russia. It's time to stop playing giveaways with Ukraine .. Since 2013, Russia has played these games in the hope of prudence of Ukraine .. Result? We have lost, only in loans and assistance from Ukraine 3 billion dollars and we still cannot return .. Spending millions of dollars on the courts, lawyers and other England. We lost tens of billions of dollars in preferential gas supplies to Ukraine (because we considered them our brothers, but in fact they showed who they were). and endless disputes and litigation in the European Courts. And tens of billions more debts in courts with Ukraine .. (and these trillions are so necessary for Russia and its citizens). We have lost, due to this ostrich policy, hundreds of billions of dollars in the loss of Russian business and Russia's ownership of some enterprises and banks in Ukraine. We lost Trillions of dollars to set up enterprises that we lost in Ukraine, and whether we lost contact with partner deliveries. equipment, and so on. We helped, with our ostrich actions not to resist evil, put against ourselves millions of Ukrainian citizens who, due to propaganda in Ukraine, have become our enemies. I don’t already consider the bloody massacre that Ukraine has been waging for four years against Russian people who do not agree with the bloody politics of Ukraine .. Tens of thousands of dead and tortured, and hundreds of thousands of wounded .. And they could - toughly at the beginning to stop this orgy, even by armed means, having more rights to send troops to Ukraine than the USA and NATO to Afghanistan, or Iraq, or to SYRIA, or to Libya. And so far, an example with this incident is the passage of rusty Ukrainian vessels through the sea zones of Russia (it is clear that this is only bravado and no more than that, and a demonstration of its impunity. ), our cheers patriots everywhere proclaim .. THIS IS A PROVOCATION, WE WILL NOT RESPOND TO PROVOCATION UKRAINE ... !!! In fact, Ukraine has not carried out provocations for a long time, it does what it sees fit, firmly knowing that Russia will accept this as a provocation, and will not answer for it in any way .. It is time to end, and to promote acts of non-resistance to evil .. It is time for Russia to give adequate answers to Ukraine (in all directions. Military, judicial, without pity, economic, international), so that she would know that their provocation would not go unpunished .. This ostrich policy is too expensive, and the fear of putting Ukraine in its place. People are dying in Ukraine, huge, breathtaking funds are being lost on the Courts in Western courts. Huge losses in sanctions, and the need to spend money on creating their own enterprises, which delays the investment of Russian funds in improving the welfare of our citizens and improving the infrastructure in the country ..
    1. 0
      27 September 2018 16: 03
      I am completely for such actions. I just would like to hear how legally competent they are. Did our ships have the right to stop their troughs? If, yes, there are no words from such cowardice. Is there someone literate on the branch?
      1. 0
        28 September 2018 10: 10
        Quote: Borovichok
        .Did our ships have the right to stop their troughs? If, yes, then there are no words from such cowardice. Is there someone literate on the branch?

        This is pure politics and inciting ethnic hatred! There is an agreement between Ukraine and Russia in 2004, according to which the Sea of ​​Azov is a sea of ​​internal use for Ukraine and Russia! We have the right to inspect ...
      2. -1
        29 September 2018 23: 04
        Quote: Borovichok
        Did our ships have the right to stop their troughs? If, yes, then there are no words from such cowardice. Is there someone literate on the branch?

        The military and auxiliary vessels of the fleet pass unhindered through the strait and into the Sea of ​​Azov (we are talking about the Ukrainian and Russian Navy) even pilot ships do not take them. (Contract)
        FAS RF is exactly the same.
        No rights other than force cannot be presented to Ukraine. A direct violation of this will result in retaliation.
    2. -2
      29 September 2018 18: 37
      You are right, only the Kremlin kagal with marmots and other "strategists" with the kagal of the waltzman, yarosh. Turchynov are playing their game, and the Russian and Ukrainian people are like consumables. Even in our kagal top, some sort of showdown began, neither the president nor the prime minister is visible in the present time regime, the results may emerge later ... Therefore, no political movements are visible and will not be in the near future. future. ..
  10. +2
    27 September 2018 13: 43
    Obviously, the rudiment of colonial thinking, firmly entrenched in the minds of the British establishment, still has to be knocked out by the effective methods available to the Southern Military District.

    I think that it is necessary to start knocking out this "megalomania" as early as possible. Why not organize a collision of the RC-135W with our drone and, of course, deeply regret it later.
  11. 0
    27 September 2018 19: 30
    Quote: Borovichok
    I am completely for such actions. I just would like to hear how legally competent they are. Did our ships have the right to stop their troughs? If, yes, there are no words from such cowardice. Is there someone literate on the branch?

    Read here in the middle of the article https://jurisprudence.club/mejdunarodnoe-pravo-uchebnik/2142-prava-obyazannosti-voennogo-53819.html
  12. 0
    28 September 2018 11: 51
    Evgeny Damantsev writes:
    This unique radar is capable of detecting enemy surface ships in a passive RTR mode at a distance of 250 km (without revealing its own location).

    Can the author explain how this can be done if the HF radio stations of the ships are in silent mode, or work in ultra-fast (or ultra-slow) mode?
    Well, at least what lies in the principle of the operation of such RTR tools.
  13. 0
    3 October 2018 02: 25
    The Naval Forces of Ukraine considers the "breakthrough" to the Sea of ​​Azov a heroic feat and praises its super-duper boats of the desert-snake type ("Gyurza"), but built at a factory stolen personally by the commander-in-chief Poroshenko.
    Huge success: at the Sevastopol "Sevmorzavod", stolen by the same type, except for the wild blackberry, there was nothing while the zapod belonged to the powder.
    By the way, if Ukraine does not have a merchant marine fleet, then what are the 100 media detained by the Russians for inspection of UKRAINIAN courts?
    That's how Ukrainian. military site describes a heroic breakthrough Ukrainian. fleets under the command of defectors from the Sevastopol VVMU im. Nakhimova:
    https://www.ukrmilitary.com/2018/10/kremenchuk.html