Military Review

Pumped rubles into the fleet: US General admired the power of the Russian Navy

66



Despite the huge sums that the United States increases annually with the defense industry, it is as difficult for Americans to overtake Russia in arms as it is for the Americans to overtake the antelope. With significantly lower costs for the “military”, Russia continues to develop and put into production innovative military equipment and weapon. For the past ten years, the Russian Federation has consistently strengthened the strength of its marine fleet as part of project 20380.

Last year, the “Perfect” corvette came to water, and today the “Loud” corvette arrived in Vladivostok. Both ships are designed for combat in the near sea zone with surface ships and enemy submarines.

In addition, as part of the creation of a multi-purpose underwater system, nuclear submarines of the fourth and fifth generations were presented, capable of diving to a depth of more than 1 km and silently moving to the designated target with great speed.

Vladimir Putin also spoke in March last year about unmanned submarines equipped with nuclear ammunition that can travel much faster than modern submarines.

Strengthening the position of the Pacific Fleet of Russia could not help but notice the Americans. So the commander of the Sixth Fleet of the US Federal Migration Service, Vice Admiral James Foggo, said on his Twitter account that the activity of submarines in Russia has seriously increased since he first appeared in military service in Europe, as well as since the beginning of the Cold War.

"The Russian fleet continues to pump rubles into the submarine zone, with the result that they have very effective submarine forces."

According to the general, the United States is “drawn into the fourth battle for the Atlantic” and is forced to confront Russia and China due to the sharply increased activity of the Russian Navy.

“The theater of submarine warfare is very important. This is a complex war game in which we all participate, ”concluded James Foggo.

In late August, the Americans had to revive the second fleet of the naval forces to "contain Russia in the North Atlantic", referring to domestic submarines that terrify the Americans.
Author:
66 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Heterocapsa
    Heterocapsa 1 September 2018 09: 03
    0
    The arms race never ended, despite the fact that we are repeatedly told that we will never get involved in this race. Better than with yachts and offshore.
    1. Non liberoid Russian
      Non liberoid Russian 1 September 2018 10: 41
      +3
      that no post is universal crying and komenty with yachts and offshore ... maybe go to bulk, they love such whiners ... by the way, but what without pensions and VAT?
      1. Heterocapsa
        Heterocapsa 1 September 2018 12: 00
        0
        You will remember about whiners in retirement. When instead of a decent retirement, you will only eat marshall epaulets from this site instead of bread.
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 1 September 2018 13: 15
          +5
          Quote: Heterocapsa
          You will remember about whiners in retirement. When instead of a decent retirement, you will only eat marshall epaulets from this site instead of bread.

          Well, in his repertoire. And then I really thought, can you really write only about yachts and offshore, but you will miss about pensions and bread at least once. Turn off the Internet and buy yourself a bread for this money, Hungry on the Internet do not sit for days.
          1. Heterocapsa
            Heterocapsa 1 September 2018 13: 29
            +3
            I’ll even give you a masterful sarcasm.
            1. hrych
              hrych 1 September 2018 20: 27
              +1
              Quote: Heterocapsa
              About whiners you will remember in retirement ... you will eat instead of bread

              Opposition is not correct, comrade, but I will teach you. There is no problem with bread, and its price, even for the smallest pension, is high, the Russian Federation is one of the most powerful grain exporters, so the replica is untenable. But on the spite of the day, about raising the retirement age, you can blurt out, saying that you remember about whiners when you do not live to retirement. Although, if you do not survive, can you remember. In short, you need some kind of Grantoed-State Department mold for training.
              By fleet, i.e. on the subject of the article, certainly advances, and indeed the revolutionary shifts in our Navy, were even appreciated by the enemies, especially the re-creation of the Atlantic Fleet. This says that they take Poseidon's threat so seriously that the Second Fleet has to be recreated. He will look for Poseidons in the abyss of waters, which supposedly for three years are able to lie on their abdomen and wait for a start command (or vice versa, cancellation, such as the Dead Hand), then rotation. Our submarines, in the form of an SSBN, will certainly not climb into the Atlantic, for which SOSUS and the US Second Fleet were imprisoned, the range of ICBMs allows this not to be done. But our multipurpose missiles can pose a threat with their cruise missiles, and the fleet’s mission will probably include air defense / missile defense of the US East Coast from our KR and hypersonic gliders. They have a lot of work to do and I'm afraid they will not cope.
      2. Sandor Clegane
        Sandor Clegane 1 September 2018 12: 12
        +1
        Quote: Not Liberoid Russian
        can dump to bulk

        Well, you need it there
        Quote: Not Liberoid Russian
        there they love such whiners ..

        and you do not belong to them? love
        Quote: Not Liberoid Russian
        By the way, what without pensions and VAT?
        negative
      3. Heterocapsa
        Heterocapsa 1 September 2018 12: 15
        +2
        By your logic, it turns out then that you are a kremlebotik.
        1. hrych
          hrych 1 September 2018 20: 54
          0
          Quote: Heterocapsa
          By your logic, it turns out then that you are a kremlebotik.

    2. kot423
      kot423 1 September 2018 11: 04
      +3
      Manual about "yachts, offshore" change. Or be adequate then, before you find fault with the country's power (don't care if it is good or bad, this is already the second question) - compare it with those you are trying to praise ... Remind me - did mattresses and Co. have a lot of goblin landings of the minister's level? Or is it just that everything is simply opuque, 2/1 of their military budget does not go to yachts, offshore, there is no unemployment, veterans of any wars do not sit in garbage dumps without grub, there are no problems in social services, utilities, etc.?
      1. 2329 Carpenter
        2329 Carpenter 1 September 2018 11: 22
        0
        Cat, it's just an echo of Moscow. Only side view. They sing one song, only from different ends, they do the same thing.
        Here it is, Echo, unmeasured.
      2. Heterocapsa
        Heterocapsa 1 September 2018 11: 57
        +2
        I don’t praise anyone. And, in other words, you’ve had to plant one minister phahaha to calm down)))
        1. kot423
          kot423 1 September 2018 12: 11
          0
          Not right. To calm down, stalling people like you from my country will suffice. The minister is just an example that you ignored. So - change the manuals, your bullshit doesn’t roll (it’s all gone, the economy is in shreds, it has been used up by the army, and I am starving at meetings with pensioners) more. Whoever does not feed his army will feed someone else's.
          1. Heterocapsa
            Heterocapsa 1 September 2018 12: 18
            +2
            It means fate to you to live forever in anxiety.
            1. kot423
              kot423 1 September 2018 12: 22
              -4
              Well ... You're not worried that your tower will be unscrewed in a dark passage (you hope for the "nameless Internet") ... Why should I worry?
              1. Heterocapsa
                Heterocapsa 1 September 2018 12: 36
                0
                You yourself wrote that you need milking reassurance and then you write that you don’t worry. Phahaha. Everything is clear, let's tower))
      3. serg.shishkov2015
        serg.shishkov2015 1 September 2018 14: 42
        0
        and I'm talking about that! our elections who just didn’t kick! and what about the former, from the USSR? Uzbek bash and Turkmen bash, kicking forward, in Azerbaijan father-to-son power, KZ-khan, officially president for life, Russian tribals have become blacks at the tribalt, non-citizens, how much does Lukashenko sit? I’m completely silent about Ukraine ,,,, so that at least the appearance of decency is preserved, three stood at the helm
    3. Ros 56
      Ros 56 1 September 2018 16: 06
      -1
      Vova does not need to be a parrot and repeat from comment to comment - everything is lost, the client leaves, the plaster is removed. There are smarter thoughts, if not, then alas. Until better times.
  2. Same lech
    Same lech 1 September 2018 09: 08
    +8
    The US General is delighted with the power of the Russian Navy ...

    that I doubt it ... after all, the US Navy is the center of the universe for the Americans ... this fleet has as many as 11 aircraft carriers with a bunch of aircraft and security and escort equipment ... so much so for our little fleet before such monsters. smile

    So all the same, who or what will win in a possible conflict of the fleets ... brute force and size or a surgical scalpel with smart brains.?
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 1 September 2018 09: 25
      +4
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      So all the same, who or what will win in a possible conflict of the fleets ... brute force and size or a surgical scalpel with smart brains.?

      In this possible conflict, there may be no winners or losers, for little will seem to anyone.
      1. Terenin
        Terenin 1 September 2018 11: 15
        +2
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        So all the same, who or what will win in a possible conflict of the fleets ... brute force and size or a surgical scalpel with smart brains.?

        In this possible conflict, there may be no winners or losers, for little will seem to anyone.

        Pasha, hi hi You still do not give up hope to reach the prudence of the US authorities? wink
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 1 September 2018 11: 19
          +2
          Gena, be healthy! hi
          Quote: Terenin
          You still do not give up hope to reach the prudence of the US authorities?

          If it (prudence) is still there, then yes: a little spark of hope is still warming barely ... And this is more true not for politicians who are not aware of the consequences.
          1. Terenin
            Terenin 1 September 2018 11: 33
            +4
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Gena, be healthy! hi
            Quote: Terenin
            You still do not give up hope to reach the prudence of the US authorities?

            If it (prudence) is still there, then yes: a little spark of hope is still warming barely ... And this is more true not for politicians who are not aware of the consequences.

            And you, Pasha is right. Oddly enough, there are still such people there. yes
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 1 September 2018 11: 44
              +2
              Quote: Terenin
              Oddly enough, there are still such people there.

              It was I who hinted at the military in the first place, I'm glad that you understood me! good drinks
      2. For example
        For example 1 September 2018 11: 16
        0
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        that I doubt it ... because the Navy S ... has as many as 11 aircraft carriers ... so much so for our small fleet before such monsters. smile

        So he does not measure with pisyun, he clearly speaks about Russians:
        -
        they have very effective submarine forces
    2. Mountain shooter
      Mountain shooter 1 September 2018 09: 26
      +8
      History teaches. The relatively small submarine fleet of Germany (less than 100 relatively old and, in most cases, small boats) almost drowned the WHOLE merchant fleet of Britain, and the Americans got it. Organizational mistakes Doenitz, well, decoding of radio broadcasts, allowed the Allies to win the battle for the Atlantic. But they suffered victims - many ...
      A well-organized submarine fleet is a terrible force.
      1. 2329 Carpenter
        2329 Carpenter 1 September 2018 10: 41
        +2
        More about the technical progress of the allies could be mentioned. Aviation, radars, Hedgehogs, etc.
      2. zyzx
        zyzx 1 September 2018 10: 53
        +5
        Doenets led normally, just before the war, Hitler adopted the development plan for Fleet Z, with emphasis on battleships, and Doenitz said we would not fight with England. And if, as the commander of the submarine fleet wanted, the Germans had 300 boats, 100 in battle, 100 sailing either in the docks or in the war, 100 under repair, then everything in the Atlantic would be sunk.
  3. Fungus
    Fungus 1 September 2018 09: 30
    -3
    The fleet needs to be strengthened
    1. Non liberoid Russian
      Non liberoid Russian 1 September 2018 10: 42
      -2
      Well, duck, what’s the matter, build an armada and go around the Caspian
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 1 September 2018 09: 33
    -7
    Quote: Fungus
    The fleet needs to be strengthened

    Little money for this ... what pensioners don’t have enough ...
  5. Troll
    Troll 1 September 2018 09: 55
    -1
    Well, just the same admired.
    This campaign is admired by the fact that some American Fruit mentioned Russia somewhere.
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 1 September 2018 10: 11
      +1
      Quote: Troll
      Well, I’m really fascinated.

      Well, I’m not directly impressed, but just requires money ..
      1. Troll
        Troll 1 September 2018 10: 21
        +2
        Well, I’m not directly impressed, but just requires money ..

        This is not the point. The bottom line is that it's enough to look around in search of statements about Russia and present these statements with a grain of admiration. "Oh look ... the general (President, Head of the Corporation, Bump on level ground) praised us.
        Well praised .. what's next? The right way, comrades.. so what?
        1. Heterocapsa
          Heterocapsa 1 September 2018 10: 26
          +2
          You just registered. Do not pay attention. This is the norm. Discussing such statements. The words of a political scientist from the USA are collected here by 200 comments.
          1. For example
            For example 1 September 2018 11: 26
            0
            Quote: Troll
            that it’s enough to look around to find statements about Russia and present these statements with a bit of admiration.

            Troll, this is for you, for me and other idlers headlines and similar notes. In order for you, I and the others to sit out their pants, write comments, puffed and resented. But we are responding precisely to this.
            Editors publish those articles that attract loafers to the site. Yes to increase attendance and as a result make money.

            So, do not blame the mirror for the face if the curve. drinks

            Dress up the new underpants and continue to beat the keys. fellow

            Hooray! laughing
        2. dvina71
          dvina71 1 September 2018 10: 26
          +2
          Quote: Troll
          That is not the point

          The bottom line is that the headline is taken from the news feed .. Media why?
          1. Troll
            Troll 1 September 2018 10: 31
            -1
            Quote: dvina71
            Quote: Troll
            That is not the point

            The bottom line is that the headline is taken from the news feed .. Media why?


            The moped is not mine, but just posted lol lol
          2. Nikolai
            Nikolai 1 September 2018 10: 41
            +1
            It is as difficult for Americans to overtake Russia in armament as it is for a turtle to overtake an antelope.

            Last ten years The Russian Federation is consistently strengthening the strength of its navy in the framework of project 20380.
            Last year, the Perfect corvette came into the water, and today the Loud corvette arrived in Vladivostok. Both ships designed for combat in the near sea zone
            Now they definitely won’t catch up with the antelope ... miserable turtles ...
  6. Sadko88
    Sadko88 1 September 2018 10: 27
    -1
    Thank God! smile
  7. Masya masya
    Masya masya 1 September 2018 10: 30
    +3
    Despite the huge amounts that the United States annually increases by the “defense industry”, it is as difficult for Americans to overtake Russia in armament as it is for a turtle to overtake an antelope.

    yes, the US general is not "admired", but pauses ...
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. 2329 Carpenter
      2329 Carpenter 1 September 2018 11: 31
      0
      Yes, this is just an aria from the opera "Give me some money, bros!"
  9. APASUS
    APASUS 1 September 2018 11: 27
    +1
    There is no point in trusting American analysts and lobbyists. There is no analysis, performance characteristics, data compared, the whole purpose of most laudatory materials about the Russian fleet, to get more money out of the US Congress. The fleet has been built for decades, and here it’s just a flurry of articles over the past few years 2-3
  10. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 1 September 2018 11: 37
    +3
    Enchanting nonsense. Especially this
    In addition, as part of the creation of a multi-purpose underwater system, nuclear submarines of the fourth and fifth generations were presented, capable of diving to a depth of more than 1 km and silently moving to the designated target with great speed.

    4th generation nuclear submarines do not know how per kilometer and their speed is quite normal, and no one has ever imagined Husky.
    But in general ...
    Poroshenko builds "terrible" boats "Gyurza" and tells tales about the omnipotence of the Ukrainian Aviation and his ability to drown the Russian fleet in 5 minutes. We read, twirl our finger to our temples and laugh out loud.
    We build corvettes and tell tales about the omnipotence of the Russian Navy, and its ability to drown American AUGs in 5 minutes. Americans read, twist a finger at the temple ...
    Deja vu however
    1. kot423
      kot423 1 September 2018 11: 51
      -1
      Strange you, the right word ... If you give examples, rely at least on the words of the media (facts, I understand, google laziness), and not your own ideas. How can a 404 drown a fleet? MLRS, howitzers, dots? And how can Russia sink AUG? That is why it is true that in relation to 404 they twist a finger at the temple, and in relation to Russia it is somehow creepy to mattresses, and not your "deja-vu".
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 1 September 2018 11: 57
        0
        Quote: kot423
        How can 404 drown the fleet?

        They believe that they can approach a distance of artillery battle (using small sizes) and, attacking from different sides, shoot the enemy (that is, us) from autocannons.
        Quote: kot423
        And what can sink AUG Russia?

        We believe that a couple of three ships with 8 anti-ship missiles on board and without external target designation will be able to deliver a productive strike on the enemy’s ACG.
        Both that and another - bullshit, just the first delirium is more enchanting.
        Quote: kot423
        and in relation to Russia, it’s kind of sick of mattresses

        Only in the erotic dreams of the patriots
        1. kot423
          kot423 1 September 2018 12: 03
          -1
          and who decided that without target designation, you? And about dreams - it's nice, I have never been a "hurray - a patriot", but the facts suggest the opposite, for example - the same Syria, when Ko of mattresses simply put their flyers for N time when establishing Russian air defense, and the mattresses themselves try to stay away from the VKS coverage area
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk 1 September 2018 12: 20
            +2
            Quote: kot423
            and who decided that without target designation, you?

            Because we don’t have these very target designation means — we have a satellite constellation to cuddle and cry, the fleet has no AWACS aircraft, their carriers, too, the fleet has no reconnaissance aircraft, and EGSONPO is in the rubble. ZGRLS do not issue TsU and require additional exploration
            Quote: kot423
            And about dreams - it's nice, I've never been "hurray - a patriot"

            It’s not my fault that you try on my impersonal maxim :)
            Quote: kot423
            but the facts say the opposite, an example is the same Syria, when the mattresses simply landed their flying machines for N time when establishing Russian air defense

            Please first translate what is written in Russian, and then tell the source of this fantasy. And yes, then explain how this relates to the Navy.
            Quote: kot423
            and the mattresses themselves try to stay away from the VKS coverage area

            And we do not go into their zones, everything is mutual. The third world war is of no use to anyone. Although ... after the Turks knocked down the Su-24 without consequences ... it was then that it became clear who, as you write, was "soggy", and who - not too
            1. KCA
              KCA 2 September 2018 02: 04
              0
              About hugging and crying companions to you Shoigu and Gerasimov personally cried in their vest? What can you know about the presence of submarine tracking satellites in orbit? You know all the functional features of all satellites traditionally launched as "Cosmos xxxx". SU-24 flew into Turkey or not? What official claims could be made? It's a shame, annoying, but okay, or start a war with the largest NATO member, all RS-36Ms, against Ankara?
              1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                Andrei from Chelyabinsk 2 September 2018 10: 25
                +1
                Quote: KCA
                Did Shoigu and Gerasimov personally cry about hugging and crying?

                And you take an interest in the state of "Liana". This is unclassified information
                Quote: KCA
                What can you know about the presence of satellite tracking satellites in orbit?

                The fact that they are not
                Quote: KCA
                You know all the functional features of all satellites traditionally launched as "Cosmos xxxx".

                Let's start with how you know that such functions even exist. And we will end on the fact that the dimensions of these satellites obviously exclude the placement of active location systems, i.e. at best, it’s optical reconnaissance, which is not suitable for the control center for moving targets
                Quote: KCA
                SU-24 flew into Turkey or not?

                We argue no. AND?
                Quote: KCA
                It's a shame, annoying, but okay, or start a war with the largest member of NATO, all RS-36M on Ankara?

                In fact, that’s what I’m writing about :) We are afraid of Turkey, and here we are talking about scaring the United States, if that
                1. KCA
                  KCA 2 September 2018 10: 28
                  -1
                  At the moment, the entire constellation, including the Liana satellites, has at least 140 vehicles for various purposes.
                  1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 2 September 2018 10: 49
                    +1
                    Quote: KCA
                    At the moment, the entire constellation, including the Liana satellites, has at least 140 vehicles for various purposes.

                    Yeah. ALL grouping. That is, communication satellites, retransmissions, GLONASS, scientific, geodetic ... and yes, the military. And of the latter, far from all are capable of giving missiles to moving targets - for example, there are satellites for detecting ballistic missile launches, etc.
                2. KCA
                  KCA 2 September 2018 10: 35
                  -1
                  By the way, the RF Ministry of Defense has never claimed that the SU-24 was not included in Turkish airspace, there were different options for the residence time of 5-10 seconds, but the fact that there was a violation of the border was not disputed
                  1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 2 September 2018 10: 51
                    +1
                    Quote: KCA
                    Kst, the Russian Defense Ministry has never claimed that SU-24 was not included in Turkish airspace

                    What are you talking about! You here https://function.mil.ru/news_page/world/[email protected]
                    This was stated by the Department of Information and Mass Communications of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
                  2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 2 September 2018 10: 26
      0
      And you think our corvette and frigate fleet do not have cruise missiles, long range, with nuclear warheads and similar missiles in the arsenal of the fleet’s aviation - there are.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  11. Zomanus
    Zomanus 1 September 2018 13: 31
    0
    Guys, we’d be glad to pump this money into something more urgent,
    but you, s.ki, do not give. Rush along our borders, prepare all kinds of jackals against us ...
  12. Revival
    Revival 1 September 2018 13: 37
    0
    Is it some kind of trolling so thin or what?
  13. Adimius38
    Adimius38 1 September 2018 15: 50
    +3
    custom article to urry patriots clapping. We have huge problems in the Pacific Fleet, most of all it concerns the surface fleet. in the case of the Pacific Fleet of Russia, everything is very relative. Let’s take a look at the surface naval composition of the Pacific Fleet: of the ships capable of ensuring proper missile defense of the warrant, there are missile cruiser pr. 1164 “Varyag” (one 6-channel anti-aircraft system S-300 “Fort” and 2 air defense systems “Osa-MA” on 2 target channels ), the destroyer “Bystry”, pr. 956 (6-channel air defense missile system M-22 “Hurricane”), 3 large anti-submarine ships, pr. 1155 “Udaloy” (in total 6 air defense systems “dagger” for 24 target channels) and 1 corvette, pr. 20380 (SAM "Redut" on 8 - 12 target channels). The result is such a picture that the entire main Pacific Fleet’s naval staff is capable of simultaneously launching about 50 short, medium and long-range anti-aircraft guided missiles at air targets, while 8 Japanese Soryu submarines are capable of launching 160 Harpoons on our ship’s warrant underwater launch. But this is not all, because in the coming years, Japanese tactical aviation will be able to use hundreds of 3-fly rocket launchers XASM-3, capable of breaking through the enemy’s unthinkable naval missile defense. Turning a blind eye to this problem is extremely difficult.

    While our surface fleet continues to experience a shortage of air defense ships of the main classes, the total target canalization of the ESSM alone on 4 destroyers Akizuki reaches 48 - 60 simultaneously intercepted by the use of advanced multifunctional radar FCS-3A, and there are 4 Kongo and 2 XNUMX simultaneously. "Atago" with BIUS "Aegis"! Everything is absolutely not in our favor.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 2 September 2018 10: 33
      0
      Russia has C 400 and naval aviation with missiles equipped with nuclear charges - a Japanese salvo on our ships may be the last for their fleet, they understand this very well, because they are not fools.
      1. Adimius38
        Adimius38 2 September 2018 13: 34
        0
        Of course, we will immediately bomb all with nuclear charges))
      2. The comment was deleted.
  14. lis-ik
    lis-ik 1 September 2018 17: 13
    0
    And after all, someone really believes about a strong fleet of the Russian Federation, and US admirals just want them to not be deprived of attention and care, in monetary terms.
  15. capitosha1rang
    capitosha1rang 2 September 2018 07: 31
    0
    Watch out if the enemy praises you!