Last warning. The Kremlin showed a bear grin on two fronts

82


Just a couple of days ago, in the political section of the electronic version of the newspaper Moskovsky Komsomolets, one could read a brief analytical note by journalist Mikhail Katkov entitled “The expert explained why Ukraine took the Mechanics Pogodin hostage. The material was prepared on the basis of a short interview taken by journalists of the International Committee of the Director of the Institute of Peace Initiatives and Conflictology Denis Denisov, where the expert drew a parallel between the latest incident with the illegal blocking of the ship Mechanic Pogodin in the port of Kherson, the previous outrageous provocation with the seizure of the Azov Sea the sea of ​​the fishing vessel "Nord", 7, a man from whose crew to this day are kept by the SBU on the territory of the Square, as well as by other detentions yskih citizens, including kidnapping near checkpoint "Chongar" contract service Sergeant Alexander Baranov and Ensign Maksim Odintsov.



The assessment of the current situation presented by MK Denis Denisov turned out to be completely objective. The expert noted that these seizures and “artificial blockades” today cannot be justified even by Ukrainian economists, since the “independent” blockade certainly does not gain anything from such actions. There is a tacit hint of Denisov for those reasoned and tough countermeasures of the Coast Guard of the Border Guard Service of the Federal Security Service of Russia, which came into force around April 30 and 2018: almost all ships heading to the ports of Mariupol and Berdyansk are now being watched by our border guards or in the Kerch Strait area either directly in the waters of the Azov Sea (near the receiving buoys of these ports), which often leads to the creation of queues from vessels awaiting verification, and, consequently, their 30 — 80-hourly yu, leading to the loss of hundreds of thousands and millions of dollars. Naturally, the prestige of these ports is reduced to the lowest marks, as well as the flow of money into the treasury of these cities, and, accordingly, into the hands of the current Kiev regime.

Leonid Kalashnikov, the head of the Russian State Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, announced a much more painful blow to Kiev in the event of the arrest and arrest of the Pogodin Mechanics, which could outrun the already mentioned above response actions of the FSB Border Service of Russia. From that moment, the frantic Ukrainian elite radically changed the tactics of the “blockade game”, apparently trying to win at least some time until the moment when Moscow decided to completely paralyze the work of the Mariupol Trade Port and Berdyansk Trade Port. pushing Russian border guards to actions that hurt the interests of commercial shipping in the Black Sea to protest from NATO member states such as Bulgaria and Romania. To this end, the State Border Service of Ukraine and the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) attempted a trick, and, having delayed the official arrest of the vessel, as well as the execution of relevant documents, simply blocked it in the port of Kherson for an indefinite period, declaring that there were no complaints about the crew of the 12 man and carefully watching the reaction The Kremlin. And she followed literally in the first few days.

The “warning shot” was the 13-hour closure for navigation of a huge 165-kilometer sector in the northwestern part of the Black Sea (from Cape Tarkhankut to Ukrainian territorial waters in the Danube Delta region), where the naval training on anti-ship strike absolutely suddenly started the anti-ship variant of the Caliber-NK cruise missile launched from the frigate Admiral Grigorovich. Judging by the video from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, we are talking about a three-stage modification of 3М54Е with 2,8-swing combat stage, capable of making anti-aircraft maneuvers on the 20-kilometer-long trajectory. Conclusion: the leaders of the Square have very strongly miscalculated, relying on the fact that the poorly armed patrol boats of the Coast Guard of the State Border Service of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation will continue to try to "settle" the situation.

And what, in fact, was an unexpected person for the General Staff of the Armed Forces and the NATO Allied Command, when, against the backdrop of a new round of American sanction pressure, Moscow dared to limit sea traffic in the area of ​​the last ports left at the disposal of Kiev for a whole day, and even managed to create over the area firing aerial zone of prohibition and restriction of access and maneuver A2 / AD by sea aviation Black Sea Fleet! Whether this will be enough to sober up the heads in the State Border Service, the Security Service of Ukraine and the defense department is “independent”, let’s look at the fate of “Pogodin’s Mechanics”, and in conclusion of our work today, we note that with the help of these exercises Moscow very effectively “played muscles” for two front, because at the time of the defeat of the educational surface targets in the Black Sea there was an American "Aegis" destroyer URO DDG-64 USS "Carney".

Information sources:
https://www.mk.ru/politics/2018/08/15/ekspert-obyasnil-pochemu-ukraina-vzyala-v-zalozhniki-ekipazh-mekhanika-pogodina.html
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/3m54e1/3m54e1.shtml
https://ria.ru/world/20180816/1526631407.html
82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +27
    17 August 2018 06: 05
    This is all correct. Only in the country 404 loses some loot from the specified Russian otvetki, and completely different provocations are arranged, not connected in any way with managerial, financial or some other (by concepts, for example) connections with the first. Valtsman in this regard does not do weather there - he has his own gesheft, he has his own Sbushnikov.
    1. +15
      17 August 2018 06: 18
      This is all dancing with a tambourine .. we do not respect ourselves ... We do not respect ... Until there is a force option ... And they will spoil ...
      1. -7
        17 August 2018 06: 51
        And what are we afraid of blocking the passage of Ukraine through the Kerch Strait, our Crimea, are friends with Erdogan? And the rest is only half measures.
        1. +33
          17 August 2018 07: 21
          Quote: siberalt
          And what are we afraid of blocking Ukraine's passage through the Kerch Strait

          What basis? Your emotions or laws and treaties on the side? Then what are we better than them?
          Quote: siberalt
          Our Crimea

          Without a doubt!
          Quote: siberalt
          are we friends with Erdogan?

          No. He is just a partner on some issues, an ally, he is temporary and not reliable.
          1. KCA
            +18
            17 August 2018 07: 27
            Under the navigable arch of the bridge, the Admiral Grigorovich suddenly loses its speed, well, it happens, there, the Zamvolt stuck in the Panama Canal, but what about us, the ship can't break?
            1. +5
              17 August 2018 07: 57
              Quote: KCA
              but what about us, the ship cannot break?

              Well, it will be a shame wink Partners want to be on the go and in readiness angry smile
            2. +5
              17 August 2018 11: 31
              And the whole saga of repair for a week, but with the passage of ships flying the flag of the Russian Federation or to our ports, but for the rest ... well, we broke down here .... being repaired.
              1. +20
                17 August 2018 11: 56
                Quote: Kent0001
                And the whole saga of repair for a week, but with the passage of ships flying the flag of the Russian Federation or to our ports, but for the rest ... well, we broke down here .... being repaired.

                ..... and only the tanker "Mechanic Pogodin" is able to tow it ... wink
          2. +14
            17 August 2018 08: 13
            The basis is the unlawful arrest of our ships and crew. Or is it not enough? Or will we continue to crawl on the karachiks, as we have lowered on the zone, begging forgiveness? Even Ukraine does not consider it necessary to communicate with us at the proper level, and so what.winked
            1. -12
              17 August 2018 10: 12
              Quote: siberalt
              Even Ukraine does not consider it necessary to communicate with us at the proper level.

              With you? My condolences...

              Thinner is necessary, Oleg, finer ... and more thorough Yes
          3. -2
            17 August 2018 16: 07
            Quote: raw174
            No. He is just a partner on some issues, an ally, he is temporary and not reliable

            And it should be so. There are no friends in geopolitics. The only exception is that Russia is China, but there are no geopolitical claims on both of them. And the fact that he is a partner of Russia is enough.
            1. +6
              17 August 2018 19: 39
              Quote: Goha Meister
              Friends in geopolitics does not happen. The only exception is Russia-China, but there are no geopolitical claims on both.

              Oh, how you, comrade, are mistaken ... We have them for them, but China has for Russia ...
          4. +1
            18 August 2018 17: 36
            Read the history of the Golden Horde, the Ottoman Empire and other medieval "great powers of the East": deceit, massacres of competitors in the struggle for power - parents, children. brothers, etc. Annually changing rulers, who came through the assassinations of their predecessors and left through assassinations. What is all this for? And to the fact that all these khans / sultans / emirs / shahs / sheiks should never be trusted: they will speak flattering words to you and at the first opportunity they will poke a dagger in the back or cut off your head when you fall asleep
          5. 0
            21 August 2018 08: 41
            Quote: raw174
            he is a temporary ally


            - Good companion ... To the nearest intersection.*
      2. +25
        17 August 2018 07: 17
        Quote: Vard
        Until there is a force option ... So they will crap ...

        Again wishing to the trench ... But why do you want to fight like that? I do not want my country to be an aggressor and instigator of war.
      3. +19
        17 August 2018 08: 38
        Quote: Vard
        This is all dancing with a tambourine .. we do not respect ourselves ... We do not respect ... Until there is a power option ...

        Go to New Russia there you smell the gunpowder.
        The best economic pressure. Proven over the centuries.
      4. +13
        17 August 2018 09: 05
        Quote: Vard
        Until there is a power option ...

        Do you personally yearn for trenches and bombing? Or your health does not allow you to be drafted into the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, so such a courage for the power option? Then think about the life of your loved ones. Or an orphan? Minus.
      5. +1
        17 August 2018 13: 45
        Quote: Vard
        Until there is a force option ... So they will crap ...

        That's right. Let me remind you that this is not the second, but the third ship (it was detained not in the Sea of ​​Azov, but in the Black Sea). We must act harder.
        1. -5
          17 August 2018 15: 02
          It was necessary to act harder after the capture of the first ship (Nord). It was necessary not only to create problems for the Mariupol port, but also to use the forces of the Navy, Aerospace Forces, Airborne Forces. And the forces of the DPR would gladly help. And important issues would be resolved: the entire Azov coast would be taken away, and the complete liberation of Donbass would almost be completed. And the reason would be obvious: not "aggression", but "the fight against piracy" sanctioned by the "criminal regime." The West would stink, stink. and shut up. And no "trenches", only missile and bomb strikes without direct clashes (well, or almost without such, human losses, most likely, could have been avoided, because the vaunted "cyborgs" would first of all put them in their pants and rush away)
          1. -1
            17 August 2018 15: 04
            And in the event of the last "capture" our sailors are partly to blame, but their owners are more to blame - they knew where they were sailing and what the situation was there
      6. +4
        17 August 2018 16: 16
        Quote: Vard
        +6
        This is all dancing with a tambourine .. we do not respect ourselves ... We do not respect ... Until there is a force option ... And they will spoil.

        Drunk conversation. These ellipses are multiple. Hmm. If your respect is measured to be given to someone in the face, then everything is sad in understanding your processes. Not to mention, if this is transferred to the level of political decisions. How do you differ from the barbaric and gangster state of Ukraine and their admirers? Ukraine persistently and faithfully bury itself underground economically, demographically, and productively. Over the past 5 years, this can be seen even by the lazy. And she still owes her no position, tranches from the EU countries, without them the territorial collapse was inevitable after a couple of years, but on the whole it won’t change the picture, it’s a matter of time. Moreover, Russia without a single shot only won, but not lost. And you just have to beat in the face, so the ability to delicately lobby and just beat and distinguishes our country. And with all the hysteria of events and forcing, only the superchargers themselves suffer. Why should they bother to self-destruct?
    2. +5
      17 August 2018 08: 37
      Quote: Moore
      This is all correct. Only in the country 404 loses some loot from the specified Russian otvetki, and completely different provocations are arranged, not connected in any way with managerial, financial or some other (by concepts, for example) connections with the first. Valtsman in this regard does not do weather there - he has his own gesheft, he has his own Sbushnikov.

      Well, what's the point of your post? Do not answer us at all?
      Actually already, turn on the TV, there the most disgusting Ukrainian propagandists from all channels do not get down, they water us as they want with a filthy smile ... what is it !?
      1. +6
        17 August 2018 10: 03
        The answer is right, punishment under capitalism must be ruble. In addition, you can introduce a restriction on the supply of oil by water, due to the danger of such a delivery.
      2. 0
        17 August 2018 12: 49
        Quote: Dashout
        Well, what's the point of your post? Do not answer us at all?

        Where do I say "do not answer"?
        The action should be not only painful, but also complex and targeted.
        And yes, it’s free for you to look at these faces participating in an unpretentious show in a zombie - what does all this have to do with reality? ...
      3. 0
        18 August 2018 03: 16
        Quote: Dashout
        Actually already, turn on the TV, there the most disgusting Ukrainian propagandists from all channels do not get down, they water us as they want with a filthy smile ... what is it !?

        This question should be addressed to the media controlled by Gazprom.
  2. +8
    17 August 2018 06: 44
    There is an easy way to forget about Ukraine once and for all: to put the interests of the Motherland above the interests of Gazprom. And put Europe an ultimatum, and certainly in the winter: GAS IN EXCHANGE FOR PEACE ON THE DONBASS AND THE ELIMINATION OF THE POROSHEN REGIME.
    1. +4
      17 August 2018 08: 14
      One can never forget about Ukraine, since for the most part they are all the same Soviet people deceived by Belovezhje. And Ukraine itself is a fragment of the former great power. But to force this fragment to the world is somehow necessary. Everyone will benefit from the world, and only Bandera, and the West supporting them, from confrontation. hi
    2. +15
      17 August 2018 08: 41
      Quote: avia12005
      There is a simple way ... to put the interests of the Motherland above the interests of Gazprom.

      And pensions, salaries to state employees - teachers, doctors, etc., benefits, scholarships, etc. - what are you going to pay from? Let me remind you - the oil and gas sector in the country's budget for this year is 1 / 3. Do you agree to cut your income on 1 / 3? I think not, so why suggest nonsense.
      1. +3
        17 August 2018 09: 17
        Quote: Boris55
        And pensions, salaries to state employees - teachers, doctors, etc., benefits, scholarships, etc.

        add. new ships, tanks, missiles, planes and other military equipment about the lack of which is a constant cry for HE
      2. +2
        17 August 2018 18: 22
        But with pensions, it’s not like that.
        According to urgent need to increase the retirement age because the money strained, moreover, noticeable regardless of payments made by Gazprom.
        And a certain person simply reports that pensions can be canceled, and this person does not occupy a small post.
        What to do with this?
    3. 0
      17 August 2018 09: 32
      If it could be solved so simply ...
    4. +2
      17 August 2018 09: 48
      It happened before ...
    5. +6
      17 August 2018 10: 00
      Quote: avia12005
      put the interests of the Motherland above the interests of Gazprom

      As if "Gazprom" is a taxpayer, and if my memory serves me, one of the largest. That is, Gazprom's interests in Europe are Russia's interests.
      Among other things, the United States will only be happy with this ultimatum and will immediately fill the gas shortage with its liquefied ones, while Russia will suffer reputational losses and acquire the dubious status of an unreliable supplier.
      Expensive show-offs turn out, right?
  3. +4
    17 August 2018 06: 49
    Whether this will be enough to sober up the goals in the State Border Service, the Security Service of Ukraine and the defense department is “independent”, let's see
    Of course it won't. These understand only power, and one that hits not only the economy (in spite of Russia, they will freeze their ears), but also on the heads in the literal sense of the word.
    1. +2
      17 August 2018 08: 59
      What a sobering WHO?
      Jumpers perform what they are told, with small variations, if possible performance and their own "understanding"!
      And for those who give commands, it’s just that how it will be worse or better with the economy, until their specific economic interests are affected. The question is. and those striped have, somewhere in dill?
  4. kig
    +4
    17 August 2018 08: 14
    because at the time of the defeat of the educational surface target in the Black Sea, there was an American Aegis destroyer “Did he interfere with the defeat of the target?” Hardly. Then what does it have to do with it?
    1. -1
      17 August 2018 09: 18
      Quote: kig
      Then what does it have to do with it?

      showed that with him if anything could happen
    2. -2
      17 August 2018 09: 36
      An enemy ship in close proximity is always a threat. Given the unpredictability of US policy in recent years, the threat is twofold. By itself, his arrival is already a provocation. “And what will the Russian Federation do in response?” What has he forgotten in the Black Sea? One was already skidding from there, so that the heels sparkled. Forgot. Should I remind you again that any ship in this water area is guaranteed to be destroyed if necessary? ..
  5. -1
    17 August 2018 08: 15
    And yay ... Is that what you managed to write down the Aegis search profile for small targets? And yay ...
  6. -11
    17 August 2018 08: 47
    Russia may "finish badly". The fact is that according to "international legislation on free access to ports of closed seas", a country can detain and inspect ships of other states moving to seaports of a closed water body, only if this access channel is dug by this country. If the passage is artificial, then it must be shared by countries that have access to the coastline of this reservoir. Ukraine has already applied to international arbitration on the violation of the "international maritime legislation" by the Russian side.
    1. -7
      17 August 2018 08: 59
      Quote: Snail N9
      The fact is that according to "international legislation on free access to ports of closed seas", a country can detain and inspect ships of other states moving to seaports of a closed water body, only if this access channel is dug by this country.

      The fact is that the Russian Federation is trying to act like an elephant in a china shop wholly relying solely on force (in this region it is really stronger than those around it).
      How to develop depends on its "partners". They can look and press in another place, or they can use it.
      The ramp is so unpredictable ...
      Arbitrage long, retaliatory sanctions and even faster. Who knows what will happen to Russian ships (flag and cargo property / ownership) in the oceans.
      1. Fat
        +3
        17 August 2018 09: 41
        Quote: Antares
        Who knows what will happen to Russian ships (flag and cargo property / ownership) in the oceans.

        Ukraine will issue grants of privateering patents? As for the pirates, they haven’t disappeared anywhere, only the ringing has decreased.
        1. +2
          17 August 2018 13: 38
          seafarers international organizations are very influential
      2. +10
        17 August 2018 09: 57
        Quote: Antares
        Who knows what will happen to Russian ships (flag and cargo property / ownership) in the oceans.

        "Sleep well, citizens of Baghdad. Your sleep is guarded!" (from)
        But nothing will happen. For so sick on the head, as your compatriots - nowhere else! Even Somali pirates are sane: got a ransom and rolled off. Or: got a bullet in the forehead - and drowned! And little fellows with donkeys are worse than a monkey with a grenade: you don’t know what they still want to throw out in the morning after drinking! Only I advise you not to forget - patience ends sooner or later. And among the Ukrainian people and with us it is also not unlimited. So, the banderopithek will come soon! I think in the elections you will soon feel it.
        1. -1
          17 August 2018 14: 52
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          So, the banderopithek will come soon!

          what will come - I agree, but I do not think that soon! they have not yet been cleansed!
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          I think in the elections you will soon feel it.

          Do you think that in the elections they will vote for the pro Russian candidate? - Natsik will not give, in Ukraine, without blood, this Bandera’s power cannot be changed ((
      3. 0
        17 August 2018 12: 10
        Or with Ukrainian and American
      4. -1
        18 August 2018 03: 22
        Quote: Antares
        The fact is that the Russian Federation is trying to act like an elephant in a china shop wholly relying solely on force (in this region it is really stronger than those around it).

        For the local people, there is only one argument: we will tear all. And they will think about the consequences only when the dollar becomes 200 rubles, and cancel pensions altogether.
        1. 0
          18 August 2018 09: 06
          Quote: Normal ok
          For the local people, there is only one argument: we will tear all. And they will think about the consequences only when the dollar becomes 200 rubles, and cancel pensions altogether.

          This will not happen. The search for the external enemy will be ever stronger, the machinations of the State Department, the cursed KIEv, Bandera and others. We had a terrible fall in 2015 against the backdrop of the active phase of the war. In Russia, exactly the same people. Survive and not that. The main thing is to turn on the TV to the fullest and temporarily it can replace the refrigerator. Resources in the Russian Federation will be enough to fall for a very long time. But nobody benefits from the fall of the Russian Federation to the bottom. A too large country with nuclear weapons and resources. There will be even more problems than after the USSR. Partners do not want this.
          Therefore, while the triumph of the TV.
          Quote: Normal ok
          we will tear

          which is sad.
          Hats never brought Russia to good.
    2. +10
      17 August 2018 09: 46
      Quote: Snail N9
      Russia may "finish badly".

      Whether oh! Most likely, Ukraine will soon finish badly. And the inspection of ships is the case of the border service of the FSB. There was no need for figures from country 404 to shout in all the media and on TV that they would blow up the Kerch bridge. Terrorism threat is evident! Here we defend ourselves against it. Moreover, the United States is so "actively" fighting terrorism around the world! Are we denied this at home?
      So, past the checkout you and your promise. Yeah laughing
    3. +7
      17 August 2018 10: 01
      Dear Snail №9!
      The regime of the Sea of ​​Azov after the collapse of the USSR remained uncertain in relations between coastal Russia and Ukraine. In accordance with part IX (Articles 122-123) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) (concluded in Montego Bay on 10.12.1982/2/XNUMX), the Sea of ​​Azov is semi-enclosed (only XNUMX states along the coast that must agree among themselves, how to use this sea)
      According to article 1 of the “Agreement between the Russian Federation and Ukraine on cooperation in the use of the Sea of ​​Azov and the Kerch Strait” (Signed in Kerch on 24.12.2003/XNUMX/XNUMX), the Sea of ​​Azov and the Kerch Strait are historically the inland waters of the Russian Federation and Ukraine; The Sea of ​​Azov is delimited by the state border line in accordance with the agreement between the Parties.
      At the moment, the named agreement is missing (on the border line). If someone found it - share the details - I admit that I am wrong.
      Accordingly, in their own inland waters, both Russian and Ukrainian border ships have the right to inspect merchant ships passing by them.
      Since the sea is “common”, but without a specific demarcation line of demarcation, indicate to the sea spaces of the ships of the Russian Federation that they violated the border, which is impossible.
      And where are the violations here?
      Even Ukrainians admit that there were no actions that could be regarded as violating the rights of sailors.
      The Sea of ​​Azov is a special case (precisely because it is semi-enclosed). Its status is regulated not only by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), but also by the Agreement between the Committee of the Russian Federation on Fisheries and the State Committee of Ukraine on Fisheries and Fisheries for Fisheries in the Sea of ​​Azov (Concluded in Moscow on 14.09.1993/24.12.2003/XNUMX ), and the aforementioned Agreement of XNUMX.
      So again I repeat: legally, we have not violated anything.
      1. -9
        17 August 2018 10: 35
        The joke is not in the "sea" itself, but in the Kerch Strait. Russia, having built a bridge across the strait, for some reason decided that something was threatening it and began under this pretext to inspect ships that were sent to or from Ukrainian ports, through the Kerch Strait. This is a violation. Turkey, however, does not inspect ships sailing under the bridge across the Bosphorus.
        1. +6
          17 August 2018 10: 43
          Sorry, but where did you get that the inspection of ships is associated with a threat to the bridge?

          I repeat once again, no pretext is needed at all to inspect ships in the inland waters of a semi-enclosed sea. The very fact of their entry there already means that they can be screened. When you cross the border by car, you can be searched in the "in-depth inspection zone", turning the whole car inside out? - they can. Or they may not finish it. If they examined it, well now, has someone violated something?

          And about the Bosphorus Strait - a separate story, if only because there is another regulation in place.
        2. +3
          17 August 2018 10: 56
          I emphasize separately: in the Agreement between the Russian Federation and Ukraine on cooperation in the use of the Sea of ​​Azov and the Kerch Strait, there is not a single separate provision regarding the Kerch Strait - only in conjunction with the Sea of ​​Azov.
        3. +2
          17 August 2018 12: 14
          And she could also inspect. Has the right to. Just do not want to use. For example, England and the USA, for example, high-likly believe that the Russian Federation is engaged in poisonous terrorism on their territory.
          And they impose sanctions against the Russian Federation. Why wouldn't the Russian Federation count something like that? Moreover, there are more than enough calls and promises to blow up the bridge. There are much more reasons than in the ridiculous scandal with the Skripals.
        4. -1
          17 August 2018 14: 58
          Quote: Snail N9
          For some reason, Russia, having built a bridge across the strait, decided that something was threatening him and began to search ships under this pretext,

          so ukrpropaganda yells to the whole world that it will blow, break this bridge ..... and how do we react to verbal terror? After all, sappers leave for the anonymous call? and here politicians and banderlogs officially shout to the whole world that they will destroy it - we only fight terrorism!
        5. -1
          17 August 2018 15: 29
          decided that it threatens - on the basis of a variety of statements by people from Ukraine and not only that this bridge is necessary - to blow up, bomb and so on ...
          As they say, you must be responsible for your words.
          Yes, and the inspection is precisely connected exclusively with the bridge ??
        6. -1
          17 August 2018 16: 26


          Snail N9 (Snail)

          Your IP is either Dutch or Russian :)) Forgot to change and pretend to be a Russian? Judging by the text, it’s clear where the wind comes from.
        7. +2
          17 August 2018 21: 01
          Quote: Snail N9
          Turkey does not inspect ships going under the bridge over the Bosphorus Strait.

          Not quite so - the freedom of navigation through the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles is limited to special conventions, the violation of which in some cases can lead to war. There were no similar conventions on the Kerchs Strait.

          And so in the world in general, the situation is something that is simply growing in recent days - in the next branch, my article about extremely fierce battles under Ghazni: https://topwar.ru/145706-bitva-za-gazni-reshajuschee-srazhenie-tekuschej-afganskoj -vojny-.html
  7. +4
    17 August 2018 09: 04
    Quote: KCA
    Under the navigable arch of the bridge, the Admiral Grigorovich suddenly loses its speed, well, it happens, there, the Zamvolt stuck in the Panama Canal, but what about us, the ship can't break?

    Showy and expensive. If we DON'T go out for a walk, denounce the agreement on Azov and all business. We of course "let you pass" you, but first to PAPER, ie. new agreement on shipping in OUR INLAND WATER!
    1. +3
      17 August 2018 10: 02
      At the moment, the Azov Sea is the same ours as the Ukrainian one. See Part IX of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) (concluded in Montego Bay on December 10.12.1982, 24.12.2003), "Agreement between the Russian Federation and Ukraine on Cooperation in the Use of the Sea of ​​Azov and the Kerch Strait" (Signed in Kerch XNUMX) and my comment above.
      However, this does not mean that our actions to search for ships and declare exercises are illegal. All under existing agreements.
      1. 0
        17 August 2018 11: 28
        That's right, there is a contract that can be done in a way ... to cover with something and something like that.
        Why is this worse than the proposal to "stick" a "plug" in the form of a "broken" ship into the neck of the strait?
        Those. to observe or not to observe, that is the question.
      2. 0
        17 August 2018 12: 17
        And why not revise the contract in the light of new relationships?
        1. +1
          17 August 2018 12: 24
          What exactly do you want to review there? There and so - solid but important general phrases about the status of the Sea of ​​Azov. In a good way, we need a separate supplement in the form of an agreement on the border, but taking into account current relations with Ukraine, we will sign the peace with the Japanese faster leaving the Kuril Islands than agree on a water border in the Sea of ​​Azov.
          Of course, the option of making the sea inland and not bothering warms the soul, but I will define it as my own imagination, just in case. And then I can offend anyone inadvertently)
  8. +3
    17 August 2018 09: 10
    Quote: avia12005
    There is an easy way to forget about Ukraine once and for all: to put the interests of the Motherland above the interests of Gazprom. And put Europe an ultimatum, and certainly in the winter: GAS IN EXCHANGE FOR PEACE ON THE DONBASS AND THE ELIMINATION OF THE POROSHEN REGIME.

    I wish the SHA and their mongrel rejoiced! Russia is immediately accused of gas blackmail, declared an unreliable partner.
    1. -1
      17 August 2018 12: 18
      And great! Gas will remain for our grandchildren. We ourselves will finally develop something real.
  9. -3
    17 August 2018 09: 51
    Everyone did not give a damn and forgot about it. They are waiting for the next ship to be captured by the toothless. It’s possible they shot ... they scared someone ???
  10. 0
    17 August 2018 09: 51
    Rather, they showed a fist to mattresses than they scared Ukrainians. So as not to become very impudent. Azov and the Black Sea are definitely ours.
    PS: At 19m, as it seems to me, the Ukrainian question will be closed. By force and most likely together with the unfinished.
    1. +1
      17 August 2018 10: 23
      Quote: shinobi
      In 19, as it seems to me, the Ukrainian question will be closed. By force and most likely together with the unfinished.

      "There will be no peace while Javdet is alive!" (C) laughing
  11. -3
    17 August 2018 11: 07
    I’ll write an obvious explanation for people who are able to think, explaining why the delays of Russian courts began, in my opinion.
    Everything is easier than ever - the Ukrainian Crimean Prosecutor’s Office, the Crimean Police and so on have been created and have fully earned.
    And since there are people, they must do something, otherwise no one will contain them.
    That's the whole explanation, and no long conspiracy theories are needed
    1. -1
      17 August 2018 11: 19
      Quote: Avior
      created and fully operational the Ukrainian Prosecutor's Office of the Crimea, the Crimean Police ...

      ... "in exile" laughing

      Quote: Avior
      for people able to think, explaining why delays of Russian courts began, in my opinion

      "capable of thinking ... in my opinion" is a strong construction, I will use good
      1. +1
        17 August 2018 13: 40
        in exile, not in exile, but there are staff and they get salaries.
        So, in the reports you need to write something
    2. +1
      17 August 2018 12: 20
      Well, yes, she herself was created and she earned herself. Without any back thought ...
      1. +1
        17 August 2018 13: 42
        created according to the logic of what is happening, Ukraine considers Crimea its territory, which means that there should be state bodies of Crimea
  12. 0
    17 August 2018 11: 41
    Thanks, Eugene! What will we do with Transnistria from the Black Sea?
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. -3
    17 August 2018 20: 49
    Pulling up the more or less land component of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Russia is slowly leading Ukraine to strengthen its air, sea, and missile, at the level of the OTR, component. A very thoughtful and consistent policy. And if third forces help Ukraine with the arrangement and financing of the army, and for sure, Russia will help , with its budget losing weight every day, there’s nothing to hope for ... the GDP and the team will retire, and the situation, which will later be heard for at least a hundred years, will have to be raked not only for the grandchildren, but also for the great-grandchildren. . What a joy.
    1. +1
      18 August 2018 00: 49
      Ostap, believe abroad will help you! laughing
      1. 0
        19 August 2018 00: 46
        Well, not only to you ... where it’s more relevant, they will help. The Russian Federation is more dangerous than the bare-backed Palestinians. And I'm sorry that the outflow from you will go.
    2. 0
      18 August 2018 11: 06
      Third forces will help, you say? At whose expense is the banquet planned? if the locals don’t care what their great-great-grandchildren should owe - even before they are born, well, for God's sake, these are already the problems of those same inhabitants, and rake, you say? - what to rake is already the main slogan - don’t have to turn your back, we’ll live on it ...
      1. 0
        19 August 2018 00: 47
        And then you or we do not know at whose expense.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    18 August 2018 09: 15
    last chinese warning ...
    Teaching is good. In their ter. waters not to shoot.
    Nothing special happened
    USS Carney as it went to all ports of NATO and Odessa, and so it goes. The next visit has already begun.
    The exercises in Ukraine on missile firing, the exercises of the Russian Federation on missile firing did not hinder anyone.
  18. +1
    20 August 2018 10: 21
    Quote: Boris55
    Let me remind you - the oil and gas sector in the country's budget for this year is 1/3.

    why is it so harsh to abandon Gazprom. it’s not for the miller that we built it, not for foreign beneficiaries, but for the people, if you remove from the budget of Gazprom what this top spends on itself, you can increase pensions and lower the VAT, and the army and navy will remain. to do. raise the retirement age, there is Medvedev, raise the VAT, Putin signed, and think with his head and hands for the benefit of the people and the country, no one
  19. +2
    21 August 2018 22: 06
    Understood nothing. In response to the actions of the Ukrainian authorities, we conducted missile-launch exercises.
    Good. And how does this affect the timing of the transfer (at least) of our fellow citizens ?!
    Apparently nothing.