One-armed Marine serves as an example for other fighters.

129


Patrol base, Helmand province, Afghanistan. “It’s been reported that non-commissioned officers are required as a combat replacement,” says Ricardo Ramirez, sergeant of the 1 Battalion of the 5 Regiment of the Marine Corps, “experienced guys who want to help our brothers in Sangin.”

Ramirez, a veteran of the Iraqi war, accurately fit the description, responded to the call and volunteered to serve in Afghanistan. His rich previous combat experience immediately caught my eye and could not go unnoticed.

However, there is one peculiarity: his arm was amputated.

In February 2006, Ramirez was wounded in combat while serving in Iraq as part of the 3 Battalion of the 5 Regiment of the Marine Corps, and two years later he became the first person with an amputated arm to join the Marine Corps. Since then, he served as an instructor in the city battles, where he taught other marines. His real service demonstrates commitment to his military roots. By his behavior, he sets an example to other warriors: "If you fight, you will achieve everything."

One-armed Marine serves as an example for other fighters.


“When I first got into the 1 platoon, I happened to be at the center of military operations, where I heard marines radio communications,” Ramirez recalls. I heard on the air: "Hey, we just got a combat replacement and, damn! One of them lacked a hand, and then all I heard was," What? Are you serious?"

The commander of the Marine Corps disappointed potential skeptics who doubt Ramirez’s ability to return to the battlefield by satisfying Ramírez’s request to re-enlist for military service and found him fit for duty without restrictions.

“One should not be judged by a man or a marine by what he looks like, what he is missing or what he doesn’t,” says Ramirez of Quebrallas, Puerto Rico. "A marine should be judged by his experience, labor discipline, his behavior, and of course the way he leads his Marines into battle. This is what you need to look at."

“I’m a Marine and I’m a Marine for a very long time,” said Ramirez, who has served in the Marine Corps for 10 years. "If you asked me if I could lead the marines into battle, I would say that I certainly can, despite the loss of my arm."



When he learned that he could be a combat replacement for the sister battalion 1 / 5, he jumped at the opportunity. However, Ramirez was afraid that, despite the complete recovery, he would be sent to serve as a combat replacement for some large base as a permanent guard sergeant.

“As I told the commanders, I trained to do everything the marines had to do on the battlefield,” Ramirez said. People may think about something that I can’t do or I will not be able to do. I learned to do everything , be it a bundle or reload weapons".

The screws on his weapon are positioned to allow him to use the claws of the prosthesis in any situation and are further evidence of how Ramirez is preparing for battle. Where most people can simply wrap their arms around their arms, Ramirez has set the screws on the sides of the rifle so that he can make an effort and adjust the angle at which he can comfortably hold his weapon. This came in handy when he was assigned to the 1 platoon.



“I always send the best fighters into battle,” says Lt. Charles Poulton, platoon commander, Ramirez unit. "When I first heard about the combat replacement arrived, I chose it, because everyone who has only one hand, but is eager to fight should be here with me."

“I knew I wouldn’t just keep him in reserve,” says Poulton. I was going to give him the chance he deserved by doing everything to get here. I leave him in the game.

Ramirez, having the desire to pave the way for all wounded soldiers, got his chance and took full advantage of it.



A fighter with an amputated arm goes out several times a day "for the wire" during patrols. He seeks to thoroughly examine the area of ​​the part. Upon arrival at the 1 platoon, he was assigned to a platoon intelligence officer, and later led the mobile reconnaissance group.

“Being around the base’s perimeter every day and patrolling nearby territory is actually very, very important because rumors about my successful deployment will spread quickly,” Ramirez said. Marines with disabilities and people with disabilities will see that their limitations are only when they are they themselves perceive them as such. "

Ramirez’s next goal in the Marine Corps is to become a sniper scout and, as such, serve in the command of special operations of the marines. He still wants to influence the other wounded in battle, so that they can reach their full potential, even after they are retired from the marines.



Editor's Note: The 1 Battalion of the 5 Marine Regiment is currently assigned to the 2 Marine Corps Division, which leads the Leatherneck task force. The task force acts as a ground combat element of the regional command of the south-west and operates in partnership with the Afghan National Security Forces and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to conduct operations against the rebels. The unit is engaged in providing security for the Afghan people, suppressing rebel forces and assisting the Afghan national security forces to support the strengthening of stability, development and the rule of law.

129 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Satanail
    -8
    17 May 2012 08: 55
    In one word, "one-armed bandit" Luchsheb changed his head or torn off his legs, although you can't say that and the soldier is not guilty of anything. But the US soldiers are soldiers of the 3rd Reich and the actions of the US and the military are comparable to the Nazis from the Gestapo. Since my grandfather lost his leg during the war, let the "neo nazis" (usa) be sad and the army will consist of "allovian soldiers"
    1. alex21411
      -1
      17 May 2012 10: 01
      It’s stupidly PR ... it’s obvious from the photographs that they are staged, the pros clicked it ... It’ll be even more interesting, I think, and the legless will be added there ...
      1. +1
        17 May 2012 13: 49
        Already serve. I don’t remember only in the Marine Corps, or in the army.
      2. wk
        -3
        17 May 2012 14: 57
        Quote: alex21411
        Stupidly PR is coming ...

        in addition, it is very immoral .... something from the arsenals of Goebels propaganda .... I recall Hitler in the courtyard of the office sending minor Fausniki to defend Berlin.
        1. Tjumenec72
          +1
          17 May 2012 21: 40
          To save Private Ryan, part two - heroically, patriotically, and kicks a tear (from hamburger eaters)

          As a person struggling with the prevailing circumstances - he inspires respect (if the story is real)
          BUT!!!! In terms of military discipline, this is a crime!
          Other heroes may suffer due to his heroic self-assertion.
          I would be an instructor, since there can’t be without war.
          Or he would occupy some other position not associated with responsibility for his colleagues.
          1. -3
            17 May 2012 21: 52
            Modern prostheses allow you to perform combat missions at a quite decent level.
            1. Tjumenec72
              +1
              17 May 2012 22: 15
              and why such heroism, igoism ??? for the sake of public relations?
            2. alex21411
              -1
              18 May 2012 22: 09
              I would have looked at you without a hand, in the middle of Grozny in 1995, revel in the power of a great AI ...
            3. wk
              0
              19 May 2012 01: 42
              Quote: Pimply
              Modern prostheses allow you to perform combat missions at a quite decent level.

              is there a need for this? .... it seems to a crippled person, prostheses are needed to adapt to a peaceful life ..... or pot-bellied loafers will watch a disabled person go to die for them ??? ... the country and society in which it happening, it doesn’t matter ... USA, Russia, Germany ... it's darkness!
      3. -1
        17 May 2012 17: 16
        About legless - at the end of the post.
    2. +3
      17 May 2012 10: 52
      Do you think the Germans themselves were eager for a war? Only SS sheep fought and killed with joy, they didn’t ask the rest whether they wanted to fight or not, just like the soldiers of any other country, they chose military service and do what they were ordered to, do you think our people were happy to go to Afghanistan? And when a soldier in a war gets wounded, this is a tragedy, in every country there are heroes who set an example for soldiers and this is one of them. Or maybe he has no money, to work where he will be taken without a hand? A cleaner with a broom? The army is like a home for him, there is something to eat and where to sleep, and believe me, the majority of Americans do not hate us, they are simply afraid, because their government has dusted their brains with the fact that the Russians want to take over the whole world.
      1. father tudy-syudy
        +8
        17 May 2012 11: 53
        Here is the clearest example for local cheers-patriots on the subject of Heroes in the US Army, more precisely in the Marine Corps!
        The psychological and ideological training in this organization is excellent, but the Sergeant Corps is really the backbone of the System! Bravo Fighter good
        Thanks for the article, for many it will be a great discovery laughing
        1. 0
          17 May 2012 14: 07
          Well, let's just say that we have 100 times more heroes like that who defend their homeland for a penny without getting anything in return, unlike the Americans, such as this soldier in the US Army, ooooooooooooooooo little, all the gays have cropped up and people from other countries employees for citizenship.
          1. 0
            17 May 2012 16: 29
            You have a poor knowledge of reality and reality. Does pacreotism shake?
            1. +3
              17 May 2012 17: 20
              Can't imagine smile
        2. Tjumenec72
          0
          17 May 2012 21: 44
          Surkovskaya propaganda laughing laughing laughing
          Here you are librarians two-faced entities ...
        3. guessed
          +1
          18 May 2012 22: 39
          It’s unlikely that .... I can say that this sergeant wasn’t standing next to Meresyev ....
          And all sorts of Russians break ridges regularly .... They broke the SSovsky and this will have to be - we’ll break it.

          The sergeant himself is worthy of respect, humanly.
        4. Scorpio 83
          0
          5 June 2012 21: 22
          Do you think this soldier returned to the army from a good life !? On a citizen, it’s quite difficult for him to find a decent job with one hand, so the poor fellow had to look for money in the army for which the soldier was valuable for his experience and that PR with which they would be able to recruit more new
      2. +3
        17 May 2012 13: 51
        I don't think he's ashamed. He defends his country in Afghanistan, where there was a very tough Islamist regime, whose representatives attacked America. And he is proud in the same way as the Russian soldiers who participated in the war of the "three eights" were proud. Do not attribute your complexes to him.
        1. Tjumenec72
          +3
          17 May 2012 21: 51
          Rzhunimagu Afghanistan struck Pindastan - do you really believe that?)))
          He is also a soldier in Africa, of the soldiers whom he was told and is beating.

          Can you start bombing lions in Africa? or ants and bees - they also don’t have shit democracy. And you didn’t think that she couldn’t even rest against them - your liberation.
      3. zlibeni
        0
        17 May 2012 23: 14
        Well, according to the comments, here the Americans actually think correctly. If you study the comments so here people want a lot of ketsay and raspberry pants and do not care at all
        1. Che
          Che
          0
          23 May 2012 15: 31
          Clubhead trolls, I wish the Taliban success in the fight against evil in its purest form. wassat
    3. 0
      17 May 2012 13: 47
      Brilliant delirium. It’s bad with the story, it seems, and with the assessment of reality. Patriotism is the ability to turn on the head, and not the ability to hate everyone simply because they are stronger.
    4. -1
      17 May 2012 13: 47
      Quote: Satanail
      Better his head changed or his legs tore off


      "I knew I wasn't just going to keep it in reserve," Poulton says. I was going to give him the chance he deserved, having done everything to get here. I leave him in the game".


      it’s not yet evening .. they gave him this chance ... at least some money in exchange for additional risk .. for a citizen without a hand, he definitely does not need anyone in the states ...
      1. 0
        17 May 2012 14: 03
        In the United States there is a law on the positive discrimination of persons with disabilities in employment.
        1. 755962
          +1
          17 May 2012 14: 42
          In reality, it’s a little tough for veterans of conflicts, especially for people with disabilities in the states themselves, recently they showed a video.
        2. Scorpio 83
          0
          5 June 2012 21: 26
          alas, this is a law, but look for the sake of interest how many homeless people among veterans!
    5. insurgent
      -3
      17 May 2012 15: 25
      yes you have a friend, already pewter brains.
    6. Gimaev Bulat
      0
      18 May 2012 07: 04
      Come on you guys. He’s probably not where to go)) and indeed, compared to our swan anatoly, this marine is a lousy spirit! smile
    7. Che
      Che
      -1
      23 May 2012 15: 24
      Satanail,
      I wish the Taliban success in the fight against one-armed bandits wassat
  2. YARY
    0
    17 May 2012 08: 58
    wassat Cyborgs are coming !!! wassat
    Well, for garlic-kirdyk to him at home, or to bum with dope and shmurdyak, or in a noose. So I got out, and The PR Pentagon paid for it. laughing Yes
    1. +4
      17 May 2012 09: 03
      For your information, on a citizen he has a bright future until the end of days and not on paper, but in reality.
      1. Olegovich
        +6
        17 May 2012 09: 34
        Quote: professor
        For your information, on a citizen he has a bright future until the end of days and not on paper, but in reality

        Psychologically, he is irresistibly drawn to the battlefield. The thirst for killing with him seems to be stronger than having a family, raising children and explaining to them by his own example that war is not good. request
        By the way, this probably proves that Americans (blacks, Latinos) really like to fight, they have some kind of buzz from this. Actually, computer games have one of the same goals - to instill interest and pleasure from the fighting. So that the war is not perceived in the brain as a tragedy, but as an active drive, a duel. angry
        1. +13
          17 May 2012 09: 48
          Leave this lyrics for the humanities. Here I can give you dozens of examples of Russian fighters who did not abandon their own and returned to fight despite their injuries and it was not "Thirst to kill" that led them there, but a feeling of elbow grease and duty.
          1. Olegovich
            +7
            17 May 2012 09: 59
            Indeed, it makes no difference what you are fighting for. lol For your country, or for thousands of kilometers in a stranger.
            1. 0
              17 May 2012 10: 17
              He asked without lyrics. That's what they fight there.

              Or did they find oil in Afghanistan?
              1. George IV
                +11
                17 May 2012 10: 43
                In Afghanistan, they found the poppy from which georin is made. And from Afghan heroin, the supply of which is controlled by the US Army, 100 people die in Russia annually, mostly young people and about 000 in Ukraine.
                Here is the main reason for you. On the one hand, inhuman profits, on the other hand, the weakening of a potential adversary.
                And romantic snot about the fight against terrorism must be abandoned.
                1. -2
                  17 May 2012 11: 38
                  One laboratory in Santa Clara will make so many synthetic drugs that not only Russia, but the whole world will fill up. Why would they spend so much money and people to "control Afghan heroin"?
                  1. +1
                    17 May 2012 11: 54
                    Quote: professor
                    Why would they spend so much money and people to "control Afghan heroin"?
                    Then, that heroin is "Afghan", and a potential enemy is close at hand, and synthetics will have a pronounced manufacturer, and it is much more difficult to throw it across the ocean and then distribute here with us. It is not necessary to "turn on the fool."
                    1. chukapabra
                      -5
                      17 May 2012 17: 06
                      Quote: revnagan
                      Then, that heroin is "Afghan", and a potential enemy is close at hand, and synthetics will have a pronounced manufacturer, and it is much more difficult to throw it across the ocean and then distribute here with us. It is not necessary to "turn on the fool."

                      Really, it’s not necessary. If there was a goal, it would be possible to throw synthetics into Afghanistan, and from there the trodden paths into the scoop (the paths are established). ? Who is the fool, then includes? Why complicate it?
                      1. +2
                        17 May 2012 18: 41
                        Quote: chukapabra
                        Why complicate it?
                        Indeed, why? From the states across the ocean, then through Ulyanovsk, then packaged in Afghanistan, then again in small batches to Russia ... In general, it is troublesome and dumb. And even in the state drug control laboratories it turns out that this is synthetics that are not produced in Afghanistan maybe (why, if the poppy grows underfoot, and technology ... Where did Afghanistan get such technology and equipment under the vigilant eye of the American peacekeepers?). In general, a thread will stretch ... No, the Americans won’t do it. afghan and ends in water ...
                  2. Rezun
                    +2
                    17 May 2012 20: 30
                    Quote: professor
                    One laboratory in Santa Clara will make so many synthetic drugs that not only Russia, but the whole world will fill up. Why would they spend so much money and people to "control Afghan heroin"?


                    And the cost? And the overhead ??? Wah,Daragoy...
                2. +1
                  17 May 2012 13: 53
                  That is why they conduct regular operations to destroy poppy, or, for example, the other day, joint operations with Russian special forces, when at least three tons of hash were captured, and the Russian drug police thanked the States for their cooperation.
                  1. Tjumenec72
                    -2
                    17 May 2012 22: 02
                    oh damn bowing at the feet, amers surrendered a little poppy ...
                  2. George IV
                    +2
                    18 May 2012 11: 08
                    For example, such regular operations.
                    http://www.golos-ameriki.ru/content/afghan-heroine-us-russia-2009-12-09-78923902
                    /663695.html

                    What they destroy there is certainly interesting (especially the presence of Russian special forces in Afghanistan raises questions).
                    http://ru.tsn.ua/svit/rf-i-ssha-vpervye-sovmestno-vystupili-v-afganistane.html
                    Here it is written about the fact that 200 million doses were destroyed.
                    One dose of heroin is 25 hundredths of a gram. So the comrades seized, it’s scary to say 50 kg of heroin. A terrible amount. Based on the fact that in Afghan warehouses, the total weight of heroin is several thousand tons.
                    In general, we went for show. such "raids" have no effect on drug trafficking, even with gratitude.
                3. Sulzer
                  0
                  17 May 2012 20: 17
                  "In Afghanistan, they found a poppy from which georin is made." - Poppy was found in Afghanistan many centuries ago, and drugs were made here even when the dollar was not available. Afghanistan is the center of Eurasia, around China, Iran, Russia, a good place for placing bases and aerodromes. It's a good question that the USSR in Afghanistan needed, why did they harness there ? 10 years of procrastination and never took. Now some locals who fought against ours, are now fighting against NATO, a hard fate for the locals.
                  1. Tjumenec72
                    0
                    17 May 2012 22: 04
                    the reason is the same as always Afghan - it is "strategic height". There are many who have laid down their heads ...
                  2. George IV
                    +1
                    18 May 2012 11: 14
                    We found it a long time ago, but only America put this matter on the stream. For before the invasion, the Taliban fought very hard against drug addiction and cultivation.

                    What do you mean they didn’t take? What to take, desert? or the population lived in the stone age?
                    Took and held all 10 years. Completed the strategic objective. If not for our troops, then the Americans would have settled down in Afghanistan in the 80th in Afghanistan.
              2. Cripple cross
                +8
                17 May 2012 11: 18
                Professor,
                Quote: professor
                That's what they fight there.

                You either make a mistake or you believe in this nonsense like a baby.
              3. +3
                17 May 2012 11: 51
                Quote: professor
                That's what they fight there.
                So they did it themselves! The US nurtured Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden, and what they don't like now in Afghanistan (Libya, Syria, Iran, etc., etc.), well, at least kill I don’t understand.
                1. -5
                  17 May 2012 12: 37
                  So they themselves arranged it!

                  Did the Americans themselves carry out terrorist attacks in the twin towers? lol
                  Well, now everything is clear to me with you. laughing
                  1. +3
                    17 May 2012 16: 03
                    Quote: professor
                    Did the Americans themselves carry out terrorist attacks in the twin towers? Well, now everything is clear to me with you.
                    Dear, this is stated not only in the film "The Truth About America", which, by the way, is prohibited from viewing from the United States (but not in the rest of the world), but also by a lot of materials, take an interest, rummage around on the Internet. "Whoever is looking will always find it. "! And about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden, and his connections with the Bush clan, evidence on the surface does not see them" point-blank "only biased or lazy. Well, you are not lazy. But I am not an Arab with education in madrasah. Education is still Soviet, I can think and analyze. So I don’t care about your sarcasm, I can tell the truth from falsehood. And this demagogic technique, when a fact is ridiculed so that no one wants to "spin it", I know perfectly well. Number "neprohange".
                    1. -5
                      17 May 2012 16: 30
                      And this demagogic trick when a fact is ridiculed

                      fact ? laughing
                    2. +1
                      17 May 2012 16: 33
                      And who specifically banned the film? What is specifically prohibited? Which state? Which commission and why banned it? You can in more detail, I'm curious
                      1. +2
                        17 May 2012 16: 43
                        Quote: Pimply
                        And who specifically banned the film? What is specifically prohibited? Which state? Which commission and why banned it? You can in more detail, I'm curious
                        Ask in the search engine "the whole truth about America" ​​and look at your pleasure, and you will be happy.
                      2. -2
                        17 May 2012 17: 12
                        The fact that there is a postscript taken from the ceiling, I know that. Who specifically prohibited, which department, and what restrictions imposed?
                      3. chukapabra
                        -4
                        17 May 2012 17: 13
                        Quote: revnagan
                        Ask in the search engine "the whole truth about America" ​​and look at your pleasure, and you will be happy

                        http://f5.ru/lehamalenkiy/post/180217
                        This is when you type in a search engine - ALL THE TRUTH ABOUT RUSSIA-
                        look, and you probably will be the same happiness. And most importantly, prove that it is not true. fool
                      4. Vadim555
                        +2
                        17 May 2012 19: 50
                        Quote: chukapabra
                        chukapabra Today, 17:13 0
                        Quote: revnagan
                        Ask in the search engine "the whole truth about America" ​​and look at your pleasure, and you will be happy

                        http://f5.ru/lehamalenkiy/post/180217
                        This is when you type in a search engine - ALL THE TRUTH ABOUT RUSSIA-
                        look, and you probably will be the same happiness. And most importantly prove that it’s not true


                        You prove that the arrow doesn’t point to Srail in the photo. laughing
                        Here refute it
                        http://ifotki.info/10/4b733cd2dd647bafe11a27df71c0e1114f8c69119929565.jpg.html
                      5. chukapabra
                        -1
                        17 May 2012 17: 10
                        Quote: Pimply
                        And who specifically banned the film? What is specifically prohibited? Which state? Which commission and why banned it? You can in more detail, I'm curious

                        Prohibited by commission revnagan ,, and he also turned off the Internet in America.
                      6. +1
                        17 May 2012 19: 06
                        Quote: chukapabra
                        It is forbidden by the revnagan commission, and it also disconnected the Internet in America.
                        Well, you flatter me, do not, I ask. And then I will have megalomania. Ah yes revnagan, oh yes son of a bitch!
                      7. chukapabra
                        +2
                        17 May 2012 19: 29
                        Quote: revnagan
                        Ay da revnagan, ah da son of a bitch

                        Are you already mowing under Pushkin? Is Napoleon in the same room with you?
                      8. 0
                        22 May 2012 13: 02
                        Quote: chukapabra
                        Are you already mowing under Pushkin? Is Napoleon in the same room with you?
                        Napoleon is in the same room with chupacabra, and I’m looking at your sweet couple from the street. By the way, after disconnecting me, the great and powerful Internet in America, do not tell me where the states and air can be blocked?
                      9. Vadim555
                        +2
                        17 May 2012 17: 21
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Pimpy Today, 16:33 new 0 And who specifically banned the film? What is specifically prohibited? Which state? Which commission and why banned it? You can in more detail, I'm curious


                        September 11, 2001: the world is a myth
                        http://rnns.ru/blog/vadimis/news/83238-11-sentyabrya-2001-miru-mif.html
                        4409 - (Unseen Footage)
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI&feature=fvwrel
                        The truth about 9/11
                        http://rutube.ru/tracks/1326636.html
                    3. -2
                      17 May 2012 17: 14
                      A thinking person does not confuse conspiracy with facts, and is able to search for information and analyze it. Tantrums and conspiracy are the scourge of humanity.
                      1. +1
                        17 May 2012 19: 10
                        Quote: Vadim555
                        September 11, 2001: the world - the myth http://http://rnns.ru/blog/vadimis/news/83238-11-sentyabrya-2001-miru-mif.html4409 - (Unseen Footage) http://www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 972ETepp4GI & feature = fvwrelThe Truth About 9 / 11http: //rutube.ru/tracks/132
                        Thank you so much, Vadim555.
                        Quote: Pimply
                        A thinking person does not confuse conspiracy with facts, and is able to search for information and analyze it. Tantrums and conspiracy are the scourge of humanity.
                        Well, Pupyrchaty, did you eat? By the way, what is it that you’ll be worn out all around? Maybe an obsession, maybe even a valerian?
                      2. -2
                        17 May 2012 20: 15
                        You did not pass on. And what, you give the izmyshlizmy for the facts?

                        Do you have any opinion of any intelligible explosive scientists, not marginals, but serious specialists? Or all that is available - videos from YouTube, and some TRUTH in which you unconditionally believe: simply because the conspiracy theorist do not like to turn on the brain?
                  2. +7
                    17 May 2012 19: 03
                    Quote: professor
                    Did the Americans themselves carry out terrorist attacks in the twin towers?
                    Well, let's point by point.
                    1. Al Qaeda was brought up and fostered by the Americans. Is it true?
                    2.Usama Bin Laden and the Bush clan were on friendly terms, they had common business interests. Is that true?
                    3. The terrorist attacks in America took place very opportunely, allowing the states to unleash a victorious war with Iraq under the pretext of fighting international terrorism and searching for weapons of mass destruction. No weapons of mass destruction, no terrorists, no facts of Iraqi support for Al-Qaeda have been found so far. it was possible to gain control over oil.
                    4. The burning temperature of jet fuel, which refueled the aircraft ramming the WTC towers, is not enough to destroy the supporting structures of buildings.
                    All infa is laid out in the public domain, there are so many videos that you shouldn't even provide links. This site also had information on the topic. Well, of course, I can't provide paper media with seals and signatures of the CIA and the FBI. I understand that I'm acting politically incorrect by stepping on sore corns of every Israeli and touching your "sacred cow" -America, but what to do if the situation looks something like this. I write what I think.
                    And now, as in the program "What? Where? When?", Attention, the question is, who benefits? If you don’t guess three times, I can tell you. So the Americans did not blow up the twin towers themselves, but they staged this show. Well, very needed "casus bellum".
                    1. -3
                      17 May 2012 20: 16
                      Bravo young man, keep it up. wassat
                      Develop a theme: whether Americans flew to the moon.
                    2. -5
                      17 May 2012 20: 26
                      So big, and you all believe in fairy tales.

                      Let us then point by point.

                      1. Al Qaeda fostered by the Americans. It is like saying that Russia has fostered Saakashvili. The Americans partially sponsored the Mujahideen. But ideology, basic finances, people, were given by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Yemen.

                      2. About the fairy tale - in more detail.

                      3. America has always fought as she wanted, and with whom she wanted. Before that, there was a war in Yugoslavia, a bunch of military operations, wars and other things, and for this it was not required to destroy its citizens.

                      4. Yes? Well, experts disagree with a sufficiently large number of serious scientific institutions.

                      Well, a little quote.

                      The main “core” of conspiracy theories is unofficial and quite impersonal (otherwise it will go to court and most likely will be lost) indicating the subject of public life (company, corporation, nationality, country), allegedly responsible for some events or the existing state of affairs, study their motivation. In addition, the idea of ​​secret, non-institutionalized power (“curator”) plays an important role in conspiracy.
                      ... Real political actions often require secrecy not only at the planning stage, but also at the implementation. Therefore, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between ordinary politics and conspiracy. Usually, for the conspiracy theorist, the forthcoming change is of global importance, the destinies of nations and the whole world are at stake. Scientific interpretations and conspiracy theories are characterized by two different approaches.
                      ... Conspiracy is devoid of common sense, is not based on evidence or does not evaluate the reliability of sources, does not have criteria for choosing one interpretation over another, knows little about actual conspiracies and how often they fail, power is viewed as a single goal.
                      ... Conspiracy is reminiscent of paranoid thinking, which seems to conspire against him. Conspiracy theories believe that everything is directed against the groups to which they belong or with whom they identify themselves.
                      Any attempt to disprove conspiracy theory can be interpreted by its supporters as part of the conspiracy itself. For example, it can be argued that this article was written by members of a worldwide conspiracy to conceal the truth.
                      The weakest point of conspiracy theory (especially “global”) is the addition to the interpretation of a historical episode of a large number of complications. One of the principles that is necessarily violated is the Hanlon Razor. Without violation of this principle of logic there will be no room for theory. That is, in place of the ordinary causes of any event - an accident, the actions of a lonely maniac, an epidemic, a catastrophe - put the action of a numerous, flawlessly secret, omnipotent organization, all participants of which strive for a common goal and do not make mistakes; This is a dubious assumption. It is unlikely that events in which a sufficiently large number of people are involved remain indefinite: the story shows that sooner or later, real-life conspiracies are made public (for example, Watergate)
                      1. 0
                        24 May 2012 19: 25
                        Pimply,
                        When amers you shut up in your anger against humanity. Or choke on the blood of the people shed by you all over the world. Rather, a boomerang on the stupid head of Amer.
                  3. Scorpio 83
                    0
                    5 June 2012 21: 40
                    to that there are a lot of facts that are hidden and in the course of time will completely disappear from sight and it will be so the "master" wants
                2. -7
                  17 May 2012 13: 54
                  I love conspiracy theorists. Their castles in the air are so beautiful
              4. Tjumenec72
                +4
                17 May 2012 22: 00
                What is Izuit logic?
                LET'S LET - "Benladen and K" blew up two Satanic towers - and now we need to bomb two countries !!!!
                Since you are so omnipotent and omnipresent that you did not immediately take him?
              5. Che
                Che
                0
                23 May 2012 15: 35
                Professor,
                [Bust, you are wrong. Amers everything is falsified, for the pretext of the destruction of objectionable. am
              6. Scorpio 83
                0
                5 June 2012 21: 30
                this is not an example at all, there are so many versions and facts pointing to third parties that the Taliban stand and smoke aside
        2. +7
          17 May 2012 10: 55
          Olegovich,
          but you can not go too far. it seems like only blacks and latins. My friend volunteered for 85 in the DRA (wrote in the name of Ustinov) came all beaten up. But he couldn’t do it without war. Then Chechnya. In 2000 he was already sick without war. I think this is a disease psychological
          1. Olegovich
            0
            17 May 2012 14: 55
            Quote: igor67
            but you can not go too far. like only blacks and latins

            Yes, this is what I had in mind the Americans. feel
            And about the psyche - I wrote that.
            Quote: Olegych
            Psychologically, he is irresistibly drawn to the battlefield.
  3. +2
    17 May 2012 09: 04
    If ama is such a human being, why is his prosthesis so simple? Could and abruptly for their soldier to do. He represents their interests.
    1. -5
      17 May 2012 09: 09
      Have you seen enough movies? With this, he plays the piano at home, and with what he has, he makes "the application of a tourniquet or reloading of the weapon."
    2. Satanail
      +2
      17 May 2012 09: 09
      And this "Captain Flint's hook" is the coolest prosthesis wassat
  4. cobra66
    +4
    17 May 2012 09: 18
    At night you will see this and that’s all ... a heart attack, and well done a guy overcomes difficulties
    1. Igorboss16
      +8
      17 May 2012 09: 41
      if you do not touch on the topic of what he is fighting for, then he has great willpower, not everyone in his place would do that to our draftees of such a desire to defend their homeland, although I am opposed to their military presence in those regions
      1. +1
        17 May 2012 10: 49
        Absolutely right. Our conscripts will see a "pimple on the fifth point" and they already have "gangrene of the sirloin". What they do not go to just not to serve in the army.
        1. +2
          17 May 2012 13: 52
          One song says "our SLAVE ......... ICh disappeared into the infirmary, saying that he was wounded right in the hemorrhoids" this is lyrics, but in fact the guy is younger. He went to do what he knows best and what they pay for good money.
          1. Vadim555
            -2
            17 May 2012 16: 44
            Quote: Wyalik
            One song says "our SLAVE ......... ICh disappeared into the infirmary, saying that he was wounded right in the hemorrhoids"


            Jewish Cossacks revolted! laughing
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MscH7arOYsE&feature=related
            1. Vadim555
              0
              17 May 2012 17: 24
              Jewish Cossacks revolted!

              What peysonosoty hooked?
              This makes me happy laughing
  5. +12
    17 May 2012 09: 35
    Well done guy! And the United States, albeit an adversary, does not abandon the crippled soldiers, as opposed to our state, to the respect that helps such initiatives of its soldiers.
  6. alnikar
    +6
    17 May 2012 09: 43
    Their heroes are everywhere, and politicians all the time at their expense will be untwisted and show what army what technologies.
  7. snapshot
    +9
    17 May 2012 09: 47
    ordinary soldier, inappropriate humor among local comrades. As if if the enemy does not mean man? so soon and over ours you will giggle .... I hope this does not happen.
    1. +1
      22 May 2012 13: 10
      Quote: snapshot
      As if if the enemy does not mean man?

      You know, I read in one book how during the Great Patriotic War our correspondent interviewed one of the Cossacks. The question was: -How do you feel when you chop a person with a saber?
      Answer: -I don’t chop a person, I chop a fascist.
      So, I think in exactly the same way. As in Vysotsky: "The enemy is the enemy, and war is still war ..."
  8. +11
    17 May 2012 09: 59
    Well done kid. Although I can’t stand them before pathology. There are fighters and they have.
    Although this is not an isolated case with us. I also know one-armed officers with one and a half feet.
  9. +8
    17 May 2012 10: 13
    We will not gain strength from humiliation of the "opponent". And here is an example of a worthy enemy.
    1. +2
      17 May 2012 13: 53
      Totally agree with you.
    2. Vadim555
      +2
      17 May 2012 16: 45
      Quote: Understudy
      And here is an example of a worthy enemy.


      A worthy enemy always deserves respect.
  10. borisst64
    +7
    17 May 2012 10: 17
    And we had Maresyev, he even came to our school. We studied his feat, he was an example for young people.
    1. +3
      17 May 2012 11: 58
      Quote: borisst64
      And we had Maresyev, he even came to our school. We studied his feat, he was an example for young people.
      Yes, for what Maresyev fought, and for what the Amers are fighting! What they defend, and what ours defended! In the name of what the Soviet soldiers performed feats, and for what the Amers act. As they say, feel the difference!
      1. -1
        17 May 2012 13: 58
        Hysteria is amazing. He fights in a completely adequate place, and ours fought there, too, for obvious reasons. What is the problem with so many exclamation points?
        1. 0
          17 May 2012 16: 10
          Quote: Pimply
          What is the problem with so many exclamation points?
          The problem with exclamation marks is to reach out to those in the tank.
          Quote: Pimply
          there ours fought,
          Ours fought there, but at the same time they built it (they built it for the especially dull); houses built by the Soviet Union still stand there, and what did the amers create there?
          1. -3
            17 May 2012 16: 49
            Tell me, do you really think that Americans are. And they are engaged in total destruction there?

            For example, some of the data from the report of the US Agency for International Development regarding the reconstruction of Afghanistan:
            - the injections of Agency assistance into the country's budget in 2009 amounted to 2.1 billion, in 2010 - 3.4 billion, in 2011 - 2 billion
            - under various assistance programs more than 160 thousand people were provided with jobs in 2010 year
            - subsidies, seeds and fertilizers were provided to almost 60 to thousands of peasant farms
            - irrigation systems in Baghlan and Kunduz were restored, as a result of which 300 thousand hectares of agricultural land can again be cultivated
            - in 2009, a fruit processing plant was built, a contract was signed for the supply to the UK of 500 tons of pomegranate juice concentrate and 500 tons of fruit for the beverage industry
            - Provided various financial and other assistance to 175 to thousands of small and medium enterprises
            - The tax collection system introduced by the Agency allowed to increase state revenues from customs duties by 225%
            - The Agency trained 16 of thousands of civil servants, of which 26% of women
            - money is being invested in medicine and healthcare, as a result of which infant mortality and childbirth mortality have decreased. 64% of Afghans have access to basic health services
            - 386 veterinary units in the 31 provinces of the country were created with Agency funds; animal husbandry plays an important role for the local population
            - More than 680 schools were built and repaired. 48.5 million textbooks in Dari and Pashto languages ​​have been printed and distributed. Thousands of teachers trained by 52 Agency
            - 8 million children are currently studying in schools (in 2002 there were 900 thousand), in universities - up to 62 thousand students
            - 18% of the country's population is provided with electricity (in 2002 - 9%). In 2009 year, power lines from Uzbekistan were extended to the north-east of the country
            - more than 1800 km of roads were built and rebuilt
            - Today, half of Afghans use mobile phones, and money is still pouring into telecommunication networks. Next year they plan to launch the 3G network.

            This is an example of the work of ONE agency only, and the US Department of Commerce, for example, has its own programs.
            1. Che
              Che
              +1
              23 May 2012 16: 12
              Pimply,
              Well Amer you made laugh. Killers to build or create something?
          2. chukapabra
            -1
            17 May 2012 17: 26
            Quote: revnagan
            Ours fought there, but at the same time they built it (they built it for the especially dull); houses built by the Soviet Union still stand there, and what did the amers create there?

            There are houses, that's for sure, but somehow they forgot who got the huts there, the heroes of the war with the USSR. They drove us out of there and do not remember a good word, so why break spears here. It seems that the people (Afghan) carried Soviet soldiers in their arms? America may not build (which I’m not sure about), but it’s also correct if it weren’t for building, there’s nothing for the enemies to build. You have sheltered benlenaden, disentangle, the next time it will be disincentive. By the way, someone knows the statistics of the losses of Americans in Afghanistan.
            1. 0
              17 May 2012 21: 05
              US: 1 959 (wounded, as of 27 on April 2012 of the year - 15 of 713 military personnel)

              Full list of losses by coalition countries

              http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8_%D1%81%D0%B8%D
              0%BB_%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0
              %B9_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B2_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B5%D
              1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%C2%AB%D0%9D%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%83%D1
              %88%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%C2%BB
      2. chukapabra
        +3
        17 May 2012 17: 19
        Quote: revnagan
        Yes, for what Maresyev fought, and for what the Amers are fighting! What they defend, and what ours defended! In the name of what the Soviet soldiers performed feats, and for what the Amers act. As they say, feel the difference!

        And for the fact that we fought in Afghanistan?
  11. +3
    17 May 2012 10: 31
    Quote: professor
    For your information, on a citizen he has a bright future until the end of days and not on paper, but in reality.

    https://www.google.ru/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=ru&newwindow=1&safe=off&site=&source=hp
    & q = usa + homeless + veterans & oq = usa + homeless + veterans & aq = f & aqi = & aql = & gs_l = hp. 3 ... 2
    118.8181.0.8380.34.16.1.0.0.1.714.714.6-1.1.0...0.0.VazKqQYPDVk&pbx=1&bav=on.2,o
    r.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=843a5b935105e83e&biw=1920&bih=973

    The American search engine, an American video hosting service that easily wipes out all videos that do not meet the lines of their party, speaks about the problem, the American senator - this is probably all - Surkov propaganda: /
    1. +3
      17 May 2012 17: 17
      Quote: Enjoy
      The American search engine, an American video hosting service that easily wipes out all videos that do not meet the lines of their party, speaks about the problem, the American senator - this is probably all - Surkov propaganda: /
      No, no, such excuses for Porfessor and Pimply do not stop. Give them FACTS.
      1. -3
        17 May 2012 21: 03
        But the facts. There are several serious programs struggling with this phenomenon. In particular, this project is intended to end homelessness among veterans before the 2015 year, for which decent money is allocated. These are FACTS.

        http://www.va.gov/homeless/

        And what do you prescribe with such mockery? After all, ishmism is more important to you, therefore?
    2. chukapabra
      +2
      17 May 2012 17: 34
      Quote: Enjoy
      An American search engine talks about the problem,

      You probably do not catch the difference between a veteran and a disabled person. The guy served in Iraq or Afghanistan, at the end of the contract (he returned alive and healthy) he received grandmothers (being a veteran of the war in Iraq (say) at 25), did not get a job in life and became a homeless person, which is the problem. I do not understand?
      In my department, 80% of veterans of some sort of war and what? They are not disabled, let them take care of themselves.
      \ Disabled people are a completely different matter, but why is there not a word about them in the report?
    3. -3
      17 May 2012 20: 58
      Veterans and veterans with disabilities - quite a serious difference. And why do you search in Russian, too lazy to look for original documents in the original language?
  12. George IV
    +3
    17 May 2012 10: 45
    You might think.
    There is the recently dead Swan. In Chechnya, in the infantry oval without a foot. This is not to mention the pilot Maresyev!
    1. -2
      17 May 2012 16: 52
      In the United States, there is a special program to restore the normal functioning of amputee veterans, and, if desired, integrate them into existing army units. The difference is this.
      1. Vadim555
        0
        17 May 2012 17: 01
        Quote: Pimply
        Papyrchaty Today, 16:52 new 0 In the United States there is a special program to restore the normal life of amputee veterans, and, if desired, integrate them into existing army units. The difference is this.


        Homeless Veterans in the USA
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ttK_EowrK4
  13. +2
    17 May 2012 11: 17
    It’s shitty for Americans with a set of recruits, if they connect disabled people to the service, this indicates staff starvation - even during the war we didn’t even take an instructor, there were truths and exceptions, but so outstanding that it makes no sense to compare with this Ramirez, see The history of the Twice GSS Guard Colonel Vasily Stepanovich Petrov, at 23, commander of an art regiment without both hands.

    http://www.warheroes.ru/hero/hero.asp?Hero_id=342
    1. -1
      17 May 2012 14: 00
      This indicates the integration of people with disabilities in society. Personnel hunger in the army is now absent.
  14. 0
    17 May 2012 11: 27
    Inspires respect
    Actually, like the Marine Corps itself.
  15. -1
    17 May 2012 12: 44
    A good example of how to make an Information Elephant out of a fly. The Marine, of course, deserves respect, but in comparison with our heroes an ordinary ordinary case. We need to learn from amers to make a living. Moreover, there are so worthy plots of history that few people already remember.
    1. 0
      17 May 2012 14: 11
      I completely agree, he didn’t stand with our heroes.
  16. 0
    17 May 2012 14: 20
    Here they are real heroes http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qN2ODFAgSOk
  17. -3
    17 May 2012 14: 39
    To this mercenary, the head of the shooting would not be tormented by itself and would not torment people.
    1. -4
      17 May 2012 16: 53
      Call also our mercenaries
    2. chukapabra
      0
      17 May 2012 17: 39
      Quote: apro
      To this mercenary, the head of the shooting would not be tormented by itself and people would not be tormented

      By the way, in the Russian Federation, in most hot spots and in all peacekeeping forces, only contract soldiers serve. Explain to the teapot the difference between a contractor from Russia and a contractor from America. The word mercenary does not fit here, because , for a mercenary there is a completely different definition
      Мinternational law [/ B]

      Mercenary Definition It was formulated in Art. 47 (2) of the First Additional Protocol [2] to the Geneva Conventions, which was signed in 1977. A person who is:
      specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in armed conflict;
      1.actually directly involved in hostilities;
      2, takes part in hostilities, guided mainly by the desire to obtain personal gain, and which in fact was promised by the party or on behalf of the party to the conflict, material rewards significantly exceeding the rewards promised or paid to combatants of the same rank and functions, members of the armed forces of a given party;
      3, is neither a citizen of a party to the conflict, nor a person permanently residing in the territory controlled by a party to the conflict;
      4, is not part of the armed forces of a party to the conflict;
      5, has not been sent by a state that is not a party to the conflict to fulfill its duties as a member of its armed forces.
      1. +2
        18 May 2012 00: 32
        What difference is he an enemy and what is his pity. Pies fired and burned wherever possible and impossible.
        1. -2
          19 May 2012 04: 29
          Tell me, for the sake of interest, you are our paged. Have you ever been in a combat zone, served in the army?
          1. +2
            20 May 2012 08: 00
            Judged 22 years ago did not have to fight
  18. Terry Jones
    -2
    17 May 2012 15: 39
    For the glory of the Lord!
    This worthy husband is an example for many, and you, unworthy, crippled souls, bow your brow and honor the military valor, and do not forget what the Holy Scripture says for people like you - "don't pi ... those, don't pi .. .dima will be! "
    Amen!
    1. +1
      17 May 2012 19: 16
      Quote: Terry Jones
      what is said in the Holy Scripture for people like you - "do not pi ... those, but do not pi ... dima will!"

      Well then, not "amen1" but "p ... c!"
    2. +1
      21 May 2012 11: 21
      Sorry pi-s it is if the moderator misses
  19. snek
    +5
    17 May 2012 15: 55
    Quote: Satanail
    In one word, "one-armed bandit" Best if his head was changed or his legs were torn off,

    And 16 people agree with this comment (maybe more already). And here they like to speculate how highly moral we are ...

    I read the remaining comments - it became somehow disgusting. The man truly deserves respect. And how much schadenfreude ... "this mercenary would have shot his head off", "they inflated an elephant out of a fly." Sorry, of course, but comments like this are like snatching mongrels from the bushes. Do we not have so little pride and dignity that we would be able to recognize the presence of these qualities in someone else?
    1. fern
      +2
      17 May 2012 16: 54
      I agree. Personally, I have no idea how I would live without a hand. Probably fell into a deep depression recourse And this person shows will and desire.
    2. +1
      18 May 2012 13: 53
      I understand the person who was crippled during the war for the fatherland, there is sympathy for him. And this was torn off by someone else’s sneaker, so he didn’t hand out the wrong example to follow.
      1. -1
        19 May 2012 04: 28
        That is, our "Afghans", or those wounded in the war of the three eights, or crippled in some Angola, in Tajikistan, elsewhere - they definitely deserve contempt, and can not be an example to follow?
  20. +1
    17 May 2012 16: 55
    http://www.newsland.ru/news/detail/id/719071/ посмотрите репортаж украинского канала Интер о инвалидах в ЦАХАЛе
  21. +4
    17 May 2012 17: 02
    One more example. Daniel Jacobs, a nurse, serves in the Navy. Lost his left leg below the knee during a landmine explosion. Also a marine.



    And another example. Captain Dan Luckett, twice an amputee, returned to Afghanistan, in combat, at 2010.



    According to Pentagon 2010 year, 41 amputee fighter served in the war zone.
    1. 0
      17 May 2012 21: 32
      Pimply,
      another example from my life, the owner of a millionaire worked on a furniture chair full. The daughter of a disabled child, my child’s paralysis was shorter than her legs, she left the army as a volunteer (left in a wheelchair) for 2 years, although my father was packed.
      1. -1
        17 May 2012 21: 51
        What army? Germany, States, Israel?

        Well, with disabled people and amputees of different degrees, and I served. It is normal and quite adequate if there is a normal approach.
        1. +2
          17 May 2012 22: 00
          [quote = Pimpled] Izrail
          1. -2
            19 May 2012 04: 26
            Similarly, just here the flags of the campaign Israel does not show
  22. Bashkaus
    +1
    17 May 2012 17: 08
    And to hell with him! Since childhood, I have been keeping the book "The Story of a Real Man" signed personally by A. Maresyev, with whom I once had the pleasure of having a rest in the same sanatorium.
    Now I work and make friends with the mass of people with disabilities, who have no hands, who have no legs, ride bicycles, jump with a parachute, and go rafting on mountain rivers in catamarans, and not just, but good five-six hikes. This is normal if you do not whine and sit on your neck (in this case, we are talking about amputations of limbs)
    And this one is certainly well done, but what did he do in Iraq?
    1. -1
      17 May 2012 17: 19
      The same thing that Soviet soldiers did in the controversial war in Afghanistan (I emphasize, not unnecessary, controversial), and in the controversial war of three eights (again, not unnecessary, but controversial) - he was sent there by his country, which considered that in its geopolitical interests to protect its citizens and strengthen its influence in the world is the destruction of the Saddam regime. And honor and praise him that he honestly fulfilled duty.
      1. +1
        17 May 2012 19: 20
        Quote: Pimply
        and in the controversial war of three eights
        At that time, Russian peacekeepers died from a blow from the Georgian side. But I did not hear about the fact that the American peacekeepers died from a blow delivered by Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya to America. Can you reference? Please note, paper documents confirming this fact did not I beg...
        1. +1
          17 May 2012 19: 28
          revnagan,
          From the South, South Korea, the USA, Great Britain and a number of other countries took part in the war as part of the UN peacekeeping force.

          UN

          fatalities: 40 670
          wounded: 104
          prisoners of war and missing: 9931

          like the Russian peacekeepers. they also had a UN mandate
          1. -1
            17 May 2012 20: 47
            Russian peacekeepers were there under the Dagomys agreements. This is a slightly different status and lack of a UN mandate.
        2. 0
          17 May 2012 20: 43
          And what, you will now prove that the war in Georgia is more legitimate than the war in Iraq?

          The presence of Russian peacekeepers was in itself repeatedly disputed. Just as legally questionable, the mass distribution of Russian passports and so on.

          Regarding the blow from Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya - yes, they died.

          Livia, for example - Lokbury case, December 21 1988.

          5 attack on April 1986 at the La Belle disco in West Berlin.

          Mining of the Red Sea in 1984 year.

          And many many others. If it was a long time ago, it does not mean that such is forgotten.

          And note that Gaddafi had Egypt claims (which the leader of the Jamahiriya attacked), Saudi Arabia (whose king he tried to kill) had claims, Chad - with whom he fought.

          Afghanistan? It must be mentioned that the Taliban regime was directly responsible for 911? Although stop, you believe that the Americans did it themselves.

          The attack on Iraq is still highly controversial. However, a blow to Iraq gave America a geopolitical advantage, eliminating one unpredictable enemy, and impacted on another, enclosing Iran in ticks and giving, if necessary, the opportunity to strike also in Syria, along with Iran actively sponsoring various anti-American groups: oil there was far from being decisive.

          Just like Russia, it was important and beneficial to press Georgia, and create a buffer from South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

          Although you, as a conspiracy theorist, prove and explain nothing is possible. Clearly the questions you did not answer.
          1. +2
            22 May 2012 13: 20
            Quote: Pimply
            Livia, for example - Lokbury case, December 21 1988.

            The British died, and where did the Americans?
            Quote: Pimply
            5 attack on April 1986 at the La Belle disco in West Berlin.

            Where is Berlin and where is Washington. What does the Americans have to do with it?
            Quote: Pimply
            Mining of the Red Sea in 1984 year.

            This is not Hudson, and where are the Americans?
            Quote: Pimply
            Although stop, you believe that the Americans themselves did it.

            Alien hands, this is in their style.
            Quote: Pimply
            You didn’t answer the questions clearly.

            However, like you.
          2. +1
            24 May 2012 19: 40
            Pimply,
            The war in Georgia is coercion of the pro-imperial aggressor to peace. Advisers Amer creatures what did they do there? am
        3. gor
          gor
          -2
          18 May 2012 00: 57
          from the United States, civilians were killed in the territory of the United States. And peacekeepers were not even in the territory of Russia. So, a very stupid comparison
          1. 0
            22 May 2012 13: 21
            Quote: gor
            very silly comparison
            Oh, yes, the Moldovans understand a lot about smart and stupid ...
  23. chukapabra
    +3
    17 May 2012 18: 57
    Quote: Bashkaus
    And this one is certainly well done, but what did he do in Iraq?

    Fulfilled the order, where did the motherland send? Or can a soldier choose?
  24. Svistoplyaskov
    +1
    17 May 2012 21: 10
    I don’t understand - why does he have hooks like a pirate?
    He could have put such a prosthesis on his American insurance:
    1. +2
      17 May 2012 21: 14
      Prostheses, as a rule, several. Such, hook-shaped, is convenient for carrying out everyday missions when fine work is not required.
      1. Bashkaus
        0
        17 May 2012 23: 53
        In general, since such a thing has gone, I can say that a high-tech prosthesis is a very expensive pleasure for two reasons: 1-high technology 2-manual work, each made individually.
        For example, RSC Energia makes good prostheses, but there is a problem, they can do anything, even a robocop, but it takes about 5 years to get a real prosthesis if this is not a Syrian option. At one time, I almost took up the topic of creating and fitting prostheses for extreme loads (like going back to the front). not promising and very good. expensive.
        a simple prosthetic leg of a consumer goods basket for a stump-hinge of the knee joint, and not amarized, a motionless foot costs 90-100 thousand rubles. according to the rules of orthopedics, the prosthesis changes every three years, so we think ...
        And then it all ends only with financial capabilities. various shock absorbers, electronic filling adapts to an increase in the load of body weight, etc. neurosensors cost tens of thousands of dollars! and the life of some parts is the same three years. In short, it is possible to return to the front of the prosthetic prosthetics under the conditions of prosthetics in today's conditions, but it’s very, very expensive, it’s easier to catch a swamp from a swamp and put a couple NKVDshnikov FSBshnikov behind him, so as not to scatter.
        The Americans are no better in this regard, they can do whatever they want - this is a fact, but the question of price remains uh ... a dozen ostentatious super-prostheses they can make, show the possibility of technology and care for the disabled, but what would provide all disabled people with a hi -Tecs on earth are simply not enough countries that they must "democratize" In the above photo, for example, a fighter has a normal prosthesis - average, it’s hard to say at the expense of ankle mobility, if there’s amortization, if not just a corrugated protective tube.
        And finally, not every prosthesis is easy to put on, it depends on the state of the stump. The paradox is that in the soldier’s photo, the stump on the lower leg is dressed much heavier than on the hip, the latter simply put his foot in and went. It’s possible to serve with a prosthesis, but it’s difficult at the headquarters, but it’s also possible, there are a lot of advantages, for example, in hand-to-hand fighting, I took an enemy off my feet and on the head - I just know a real case, a member of the Russian Paralympic team on armwrestling got into a mass dredge he prosthesis himself and knocked out a few bugs jumping on one leg, and the prosthesis do not care - it is titanium))))
  25. Bashkaus
    +1
    18 May 2012 00: 07
    If anyone is interested, here is a link to vidyuha, it’s from my personal archive, but in the last shots, it’s just my friend, by the way, also a war disabled person, on a prosthetic leg in an extreme hike of the 5th complexity category (wildlife + heavy physical exertion, i.e. conditions are almost equivalent to combat). In principle, the prosthesis allows you to do everything with dignity, but you should not count on anything more. There are limitations anyway.
    Watch clean from 3:45 this is the last shots
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2gVF9-7RLA&feature=channel&list=UL
  26. Geton
    0
    18 May 2012 07: 57
    I read it with interest. If you do not go into politics - a strong and courageous person.
  27. Lustrator
    0
    18 May 2012 15: 07
    Опыт psychological the survival of such people for the army is quite useful.

    As for the service, IMHO is not recommended to work with l / s, tk. their injuries can convince the student of the opposite of the material presented. In short, it is morally demotivating to be a cog in the military machine, presenting a clear example of the result of a war. What do they do with a broken screw? That's right - they throw it out, replacing it with a new one. In society, disabled people are also not needed - they just cost the state very dearly, where everyone must make a profit (mind you, not "benefit";))

    You are talking a lot about cyber prostheses here and it’s interesting ... Or maybe you’ll think about how to prevent wars that cripple people? No, for you this is too utopian, because it is so nice to indulge in your animal nature.
  28. Scorpio 83
    0
    5 June 2012 21: 56
    Well done all the same! so everything is presented beautifully, that people are ready to substitute assholes for them)))
  29. Gnudist
    0
    8 August 2012 09: 54
    A man is just fine.

    And those vicious and envious comments that were written from Russia, the author could safely leave in one place.