American scientists "discovered" a nuclear bunker in the Kaliningrad region

96
The Federation of American Scientists has published a report in which it states that Russia near Kaliningrad has taken up the modernization of a bunker for the storage of nuclear warheads, and this suggests that Moscow is paying increased attention to nuclear weapons in its confrontation with NATO, writes The Guardian.

American scientists "discovered" a nuclear bunker in the Kaliningrad region




According to the report, American experts came to this conclusion by tracking satellite images. According to the project manager, the facility, located in the Zelenograd district of the Kaliningrad region, has all the characteristic features of typical Russian nuclear storage facilities. weapons, namely: on the outer perimeter there is a multi-layered fence, and around the bunkers there is a triple fence. According to the observations, work in the bunker began in the 2016 year and continues to this day. During this time, the bunker was dug up and repaired, and a new roof was installed. It was not possible to establish the presence of nuclear weapons at the facility using satellite imagery, but American scientists are convinced that the bunker is being used for its intended purpose and will transfer nuclear warheads there in the near future, if it has not already been transferred.

Earlier, an infrastructure was created in the Kaliningrad region for deploying the Iskander operational tactical complexes, which were later deployed in Chernyakhovsk. Currently, Iskander OTRK is actively participating in various exercises taking place in the region, limited to “electronic” missiles instead of fighting rockets, in order “not to hurt” the neighbors from Poland and Lithuania.
96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    18 June 2018 16: 54
    There are ten ICBMs waiting in the wings to cover Europe.
    1. +40
      18 June 2018 16: 59
      Quote: Vadim237
      There are ten ICBMs waiting in the wings to cover Europe.

      Oras an option...
      1. +17
        18 June 2018 17: 01
        Well, yes 10 ICBMs - Mega Barrels of Draft.
      2. MPN
        +17
        18 June 2018 17: 03
        Quote: Logall
        as an option...

        Yes, this option, if used correctly, will have a worse nuclear weapons ... wink
        1. +6
          18 June 2018 17: 12
          work in the bunker began in 2016 and continues to this day.

          It is possible .. Just in the midst of the persecution of Russia and the sanctions of the West!
          Russia is defending itself as it can .. In Cuba, gentlemen still check)))))
          Here’s another 47 billion (they threw off US securities), and where they will go silently and do it right (then we will suddenly find out) Putin hasn’t yet told everything about the latest weapons of Russia .. He clearly planned something and needs a lot of money!
          1. +1
            18 June 2018 21: 36
            As we see the new palaces and yachts of Putin and his homies, we will immediately understand where the billions went.
            1. +2
              19 June 2018 01: 15
              Botovody in action ... In a dumb fake acc
            2. 0
              29 June 2018 14: 43
              Judge by yourself?
      3. +2
        18 June 2018 18: 49
        Quote: Logall
        ...as an option...

        Burned the place where a former NSA employee Snowden lives ..
    2. +2
      18 June 2018 17: 17
      Apparently not one non-brothers suffer from paranoia fool
    3. +5
      18 June 2018 18: 09
      Quote: Vadim237
      There are ten ICBMs

      But why ICBMs in a KO to cover Europe ?!
      1. +5
        18 June 2018 18: 59
        Hello Vladimir! hi
        Recently, on the advice of a comrade at VO ... I read the book "Hot Spring 2015" (alternative). The attack of the States and parts of Europe on the Kaliningrad enclave is described ... So, the reason was allegedly the deployment of nuclear weapons in the territory of the region ...
        I recommend, I liked it good
        1. +3
          18 June 2018 19: 19
          the question wasn’t about that
          WHY place intercontinental carriers to strike Europe in KO?
          1. +3
            19 June 2018 06: 30
            The article is not a word about ICBMs. This is a special warhead storage facility. But why these special warheads are unknown. Maybe for the Iskander complex, maybe for anti-ship missiles, or maybe 3VB4 or 3VB11 mines for Tulip.
            1. 0
              19 June 2018 19: 21
              Quote: Servisinzhener
              The article is not a word about ICBMs.

              Before writing comments, read to whom and to what you answered (read the very first comment)
      2. +2
        18 June 2018 19: 09
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        But why ICBMs in a KO to cover Europe ?!

        And we are through it. the south pole like a thirst!
        1. 0
          18 June 2018 19: 34
          ahhh !!!!!!
    4. +2
      18 June 2018 20: 40
      ICBMs from Kaliningrad to Europe?
      Do you know how ICBM is deciphered?
      1. +8
        18 June 2018 21: 48
        Quote: just explo
        Do you know how ICBM is deciphered?

        I know - Little Harmless Racket. wassat hi
        1. +4
          18 June 2018 22: 28
          Google gives out that it is a blowjob without elastic.
      2. +1
        19 June 2018 16: 07
        ICBM - May Be Torn))
    5. 0
      19 June 2018 21: 26
      Forewarned is forearmed
    6. 0
      25 June 2018 18: 29
      33 km from Kaliningrad to the Polish border, why is there an ICBM. There are enough "Iskanders", especially since their range is still not indicated.
  2. +7
    18 June 2018 17: 00
    Well, all the secret of Papa Carlo’s closet is revealed
    1. +9
      18 June 2018 17: 15
      Quote: polpot
      Papa Carlo's secret closet revealed

      Damn, it would be better if the Amy helped from space to find the "Amber Room" and the gold of the III Reich! And so, indifference is continuous ... bully
      1. +2
        18 June 2018 22: 44
        Why look for them? Gold has long been in Fort Knox, and the room was found successfully and in the "dashing 90s" it was sold at an underground auction to a huckster from Rublevka.
        In the photo there is a "house for protection" of this huckster, and it is not possible to take a picture of the owner’s hut with the modern development of technology (does not fit into the frame, bastard ...) bully
      2. 0
        25 June 2018 18: 32
        The Amber Room over such a period of time most likely fell into disrepair, if not stored in the collection of any billionaire. Why do you need gold ?! Its intended use is not for you!
  3. +16
    18 June 2018 17: 00
    C'mon, what bunker, what nuclear warheads ?. Well, the boys dug the cellar, and so what. Well there, cucumbers, pickled cabbage for the winter, fungi, but you never know what they clean up in the cellar. What hysteria right away .....
    1. +3
      18 June 2018 17: 04
      Pickled tomatoes - nuclear, thermonuclear cucumbers.
      1. +3
        18 June 2018 17: 19
        Well, exactly uncle Sam and his lackeys for a snack lol
  4. +19
    18 June 2018 17: 03
    Something it reminds ... Somehow, American scientists, studying satellite images, discovered chemical and bacteriological weapons in Iraq .... And when they went there to look, they found nothing ...
    1. +2
      18 June 2018 17: 18
      Quote: parusnik
      .And when we went there to search, we didn’t find anything ...

      Do not be afraid: they will not turn up to us in Calgrad! It’s very expensive for their striped face to get ...
      So, "ship the oranges in barrels!" (O. Bender) laughing
      1. +1
        18 June 2018 18: 12
        I do not poke around this will not poke around ... "Fun" former ...
    2. +3
      18 June 2018 17: 21
      Well, Russia is not Iraq, but Uncle Vova is not Saddam, you can vividly grab it by snot angry
    3. 0
      18 June 2018 17: 43
      Chemical found, of course. There were many
      and Saddam actively used it against the Kurds in northern Iraq
      and against Shiites in Basra.
      But with the bacteriological, the CIA had a puncture.
      It was in mobile laboratory containers on wagons,
      and Saddam managed to transport them to Syria. Their Syrians, from sin
      away, destroyed.
      1. +9
        18 June 2018 17: 54
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Chemical found, of course. There were many
        and Saddam actively used it against the Kurds in northern Iraq
        and against Shiites in Basra.
        But with the bacteriological, the CIA had a puncture.
        It was in mobile laboratory containers on wagons,
        and Saddam managed to transport them to Syria. Their Syrians, from sin
        away, destroyed.

        Chemical weapons in the United States can also be found without problems. Will we bomb?
        But the weapon was not proven. Yankee gang violence is evident.
        1. +1
          18 June 2018 17: 57
          You missed the main thing:
          "and Saddam actively used it against the Kurds in northern Iraq
          and against Shiites in Basra "
          They were killed by many civilians in cities and towns.
          1. +4
            18 June 2018 18: 41
            Quote: voyaka uh
            and Saddam actively used it against the Kurds in northern Iraq
            and against Shiites in Basra "
            They were killed by many civilians in cities and towns.


            And the United States has never used a chemical weapon anywhere? How many civilians died from the "democratic" bombing of the United States and Co.?
          2. +4
            18 June 2018 19: 05
            Quote: voyaka uh
            They were killed by many civilians in cities and towns.

            Even one person affected is a lot. And yet, how much is a lot? Are there many more millions than the millions that the United States killed with conventional weapons in Iraq?
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. +4
            18 June 2018 19: 27
            Although Saddam used it directly - it’s bad, although all means are good in war, but is it okay for Americans to use the chemical weapons of the militants in Syria indirectly?
          5. +1
            18 June 2018 20: 32
            ShmAmerika also used phosphorus in Yugoslavia, which is a chemical weapon and there is even a video, so will we bomb?
            1. +1
              18 June 2018 22: 07
              Phosphorus is used in lighting rockets. If the rocket does not burn out, falling to the ground, then you can get burns and poisoning if you grab it. And for the production of smoke screens. Neither is forbidden.
          6. +1
            19 June 2018 00: 59
            Quote: voyaka uh
            You missed the main thing:
            "and Saddam actively used it against the Kurds in northern Iraq
            and against Shiites in Basra "
            They were killed by many civilians in cities and towns.

            Well, experience with p and ns not to occupy. They can teach you. Although, the presence of OM is more dangerous for the keeper than in a theater of operations. It’s good, for example, to bomb a warehouse somewhere in Oklahoma. Enough for so many. And to Siberia to drag from Oklahoma is such a hassle. And do not bring much. You’ll lose so much on the road.
          7. 0
            19 June 2018 07: 54
            Quote: voyaka uh
            and Saddam actively used it against the Kurds in northern Iraq
            and against Shiites in Basra

            so the Americans used it
          8. 0
            19 June 2018 16: 17
            yeah and the Americans did not kill a single civilian in any attack
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +3
        19 June 2018 06: 57
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Chemical found, of course. There were many

        Strange, amersi fans of the show, found a chemical. weapons in Iraq and didn’t spread the find to the whole world? The files do not converge with you - Colin Powell was dumped for the test tube, but they did not show all the found stock. Died from chemical. weapons according to media reports of about 2000 people in the named village, hanged Saddam. About one million people died from the invasion of Iraq, the country is in ruin. Who should be hanged for these dead?
      4. 0
        24 June 2018 04: 15
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Chemical found, of course. There were many
        and Saddam actively used it against the Kurds in northern Iraq
        and against Shiites in Basra.
        But with the bacteriological, the CIA had a puncture.
        It was in mobile laboratory containers on wagons,
        and Saddam managed to transport them to Syria. Their Syrians, from sin
        away, destroyed.

        The world dictator - the United States, used the so-called Agent "Orange" in Vietnam. How many people died then! And still children are born with abnormalities.

        So you really want the data on the presence of nuclear weapons in Israel to be published, with detailed details of who, how and what produced, where and how they tested, where what is now stored?
      5. 0
        25 June 2018 18: 58
        With such knowledge and at large? Where did the firewood come from ?!
  5. +3
    18 June 2018 17: 10
    These "scientists" simply judge by their own sun. If repair means remodeling and expansion. Otherwise, no movement. That’s why their rockets are rusted and the storages are rotten, and it's even sickening to recall the personnel
  6. +5
    18 June 2018 17: 12
    And what, they want to peek? "Iskander" they are ... Mysterious. They fly exactly 500 km, strictly according to the INF Treaty. And as the striped-eared agreement denounces, you see, their "second wind" will open, thousands and a half ... And TNW will be revealed. Nearby wassat
    1. +6
      18 June 2018 17: 23
      Yes, and let the Poles and whoever is behind them, calm down and not worry. Iskander is not against them, it is strictly against Somali pirates.
    2. +1
      18 June 2018 17: 26
      The nuclear warheads for the OTRK Iskander are not located in Kaliningrad, but in Chernyakhovsk, right on the territory of military unit 54229, the deployment of the 152nd missile brigade
      1. +4
        18 June 2018 17: 57
        Quote: Romario_Argo
        The nuclear warheads for the OTRK Iskander are not located in Kaliningrad, but in Chernyakhovsk, right on the territory of military unit 54229, the deployment of the 152nd missile brigade

        Why didn’t they attach the photo? How to warm, no photo - there was no event laughing
        And yes, a copy of the confession would also add credibility laughing
      2. +2
        18 June 2018 19: 40
        Quote: Romario_Argo
        and in Chernyakhovsk, right on the territory of military unit 54229, the deployment of the 152nd missile brigade

        and now at the request of the convicted ... under Article 283 of the Criminal Code on the air .... hi
    3. +2
      18 June 2018 17: 52
      "they have a" second wind "will open, thousands and a half ... And TNW will be discovered. Nearby" ////

      They will not pull one and a half (estimating the length of the rocket). But if you reduce the warhead, then another 300 kilometers can be added to those 450 that are.
      And for the nuclear weapons and build this warehouse. Is logical.
      But all this is pointless. Kaliningrad itself is very vulnerable strategically.
      So many precise weapons will aim at the starting positions and Iskanders,
      which is doubtful that they will have time to fire ammunition.
      An ambitious round of an arms race is being developed.
      The USSR could not stand such a race, it will be even harder for Russia to withstand. sad
      1. +8
        18 June 2018 18: 27
        Quote: voyaka uh
        "they have a" second wind "will open, thousands and a half ... And TNW will be discovered. Nearby" ////

        They will not pull one and a half (estimating the length of the rocket). But if you reduce the warhead, then another 300 kilometers can be added to those 450 that are.
        And for the nuclear weapons and build this warehouse. Is logical.
        But all this is pointless. Kaliningrad itself is very vulnerable strategically.
        So many precise weapons will aim at the starting positions and Iskanders,
        which is doubtful that they will have time to fire ammunition.
        An ambitious round of an arms race is being developed.
        The USSR could not stand such a race, it will be even harder for Russia to withstand. sad

        and only one small but proud Israel, being in approximately the same strategic position, will survive and defeat everyone, but Russian Kaliningrad will never cope with the adversary !!! and Russia’s mother will take her eyes aside when Kaliningrad will tear to pieces. by the way, proceeding from this logic, Crimea is also at a disadvantage.?!
        1. +3
          18 June 2018 18: 42
          "" Israel, being in approximately the same strategic position, will survive and defeat everyone "///

          Israel has a developed modern civilian economy, while Russia has not yet. That is the difference. Therefore, Israel is pulling an arms race with its neighbors and the burden of military spending.
          1. +8
            18 June 2018 18: 55
            Quote: voyaka uh
            "" Israel, being in approximately the same strategic position, will survive and defeat everyone "///

            Israel has a developed modern civilian economy, while Russia has not yet. That is the difference. Therefore, Israel is pulling an arms race with its neighbors and the burden of military spending.

            yes, yes, backward Russia opposed and piled up all of Europe. I don’t want to. and the United States and Co. did not stand behind Israel for an hour !? and if they hadn’t stood, they would have cheated !?
            by the way, I write "Israel" and automatically after a space is corrected for the capital letter "And." with the word "Russia" this does not happen, only emphasizes in red
            conspiracy!?
          2. +5
            18 June 2018 19: 41
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Israel has a developed modern civilian economy, while Russia has not yet. That is the difference. Therefore, Israel is pulling an arms race with its neighbors and the burden of military spending.

            who do you want to make laugh? !!!
          3. +7
            18 June 2018 19: 49
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Israel has a developed modern civilian economy, while Russia has not yet. That is the difference. Therefore, Israel is pulling an arms race with its neighbors and the burden of military spending.

            if Trump says tomorrow that you are no longer allies, then the day after tomorrow you will line up for the Russian Embassy in Tel Aviv and remember all your RUSSIAN roots
            Israel has never participated in an arms race, and with all due respect to your army, it exists only because it was allowed to exist
            1. 0
              23 June 2018 18: 54
              And the USSR allowed to exist.
              soldier nobody recalls this fact.
      2. +11
        18 June 2018 18: 37
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Kaliningrad itself is very vulnerable strategically.

        but he has a huge + that covers everything - this is his belonging to Russia !! wink Yes soldier soldier soldier
        1. +1
          18 June 2018 18: 43
          On health, who argues. fellow
          1. 0
            19 June 2018 07: 46
            When did you emigrate to Israel a Ukrainian passport when you emigrated to Kiev from a hatchet?
      3. 0
        18 June 2018 19: 07
        Quote: voyaka uh
        So many precise weapons will aim at the starting positions and Iskanders,
        which is doubtful that they will have time to fire ammunition.

        So after all, the Iskanders are there just then, so that this weapon, if only it aims and succeeds. And some will not have time to aim.
      4. +9
        18 June 2018 19: 31
        Quote: voyaka uh
        "they have a" second wind "will open, thousands and a half ... And TNW will be discovered. Nearby" ////

        They will not pull one and a half (estimating the length of the rocket). But if you reduce the warhead, then another 300 kilometers can be added to those 450 that are.
        And for the nuclear weapons and build this warehouse. Is logical.
        But all this is pointless. Kaliningrad itself is very vulnerable strategically.
        So many precise weapons will aim at the starting positions and Iskanders,
        which is doubtful that they will have time to fire ammunition.
        An ambitious round of an arms race is being developed.
        The USSR could not stand such a race, it will be even harder for Russia to withstand. sad

        The arms race to the collapse of the Union has nothing to do. You would have to tighten your education, and not learn from newspaper headlines laughing
      5. +4
        18 June 2018 19: 46
        Quote: voyaka uh
        USSR could not stand such a race

        Who said?
        By the way, where did you get that the west withstood this race ?! !!
  7. 0
    18 June 2018 17: 13
    The bunker was dug up and repaired, and a new roof was installed
    lol The analogy with the American nuclear weapons storage facilities suggests itself, they obviously have for a long time "the roof is not only leaking", but has also "gone" for a long time.
  8. +2
    18 June 2018 17: 21
    And on the roof of the storage, the rocket model is VERY BIG, that’s it laughing
  9. +6
    18 June 2018 17: 25
    Quote: from article
    the facility, located in the Zelenograd district of the Kaliningrad region, has all the characteristic features of typical Russian nuclear weapons storage facilities, namely: there is a multi-layer fence along the outer perimeter, and around the bunkers there is a triple fence.

    DB!, As Lavrov would say ... Yes, we have almost all military facilities where you have to use a system of 3-4 or 5 posts to guard, located behind a triple fence. Who cares what to protect - artillery ammunition or nuclear warheads ?! They, paranoid boobies, probably think that we somehow store them or transport them in a special way. Yeah, right now! fool We transport and store it in such a way that the adversary can see right away: it’s the Russian aggressors who are carrying the nuclear warhead, and here the Russian aggressors are storing their many nuclear warheads. Db ...
  10. +1
    18 June 2018 17: 27
    Quote: Scipio African
    Apparently not one non-brothers suffer from paranoia fool

    So, these “brothers” learn from their masters.
  11. Mwg
    +2
    18 June 2018 17: 31
    We had exactly the same fence around the warehouse of NZ fuels and lubricants and explosives
  12. +3
    18 June 2018 17: 34
    He said that they didn’t put a triple fence - as if we were sleeping. only quadruple
  13. +2
    18 June 2018 17: 37
    American scientists, twin brothers to English scientists ... who know everything and know how. It’s straightforward to marvel at such insight. lol
  14. +1
    18 June 2018 17: 48
    Rave. What's the point? What is the practical meaning? Starting from the level of a platoon commander, no one will keep the main forces and assets in combat guard, and the Kaliningrad region is the military guard of the main forces.
  15. +5
    18 June 2018 17: 48
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Chemical found, of course. There were many
    and Saddam actively used it against the Kurds in northern Iraq
    and against Shiites in Basra.
    But with the bacteriological, the CIA had a puncture.
    It was in mobile laboratory containers on wagons,
    and Saddam managed to transport them to Syria. Their Syrians, from sin
    away, destroyed.

    Well, of course, you know everything there in the promised land .... you see everything ...
  16. +1
    18 June 2018 18: 04
    It has all the characteristic features of typical Russian nuclear weapons storage facilities, namely: there is a multi-layer fence along the outer perimeter, and around the bunkers there is a triple fence.
    Oh, nifigase! belay I also have a triple fence around the garden, from malicious neighbors .... And then what to do now? what
    1. 0
      23 June 2018 19: 01
      Urgently salt cucumbers and cabbage. Yes, in tubs there, by the cellar dug up. crying And then the check will come.
  17. 0
    18 June 2018 18: 30
    And who cares? I am the owner of the house. Looks like the sphincters are itchy. At the same time, a small fraction of money can be shaken off budgets.
  18. 0
    18 June 2018 19: 05
    They didn’t think of something: from Zelenogradsk to Chernyakhovsk, but in traffic jams, they will carry about 3 hours, even if they hang a banner: “Nuclear warhead!” And those storages were built by the Germans, then there was no nuclear weapons, someday repairs still need to be done. smile
  19. +2
    18 June 2018 19: 29
    They didn’t find anything under their noses. In Cuba. 2 minutes to fascisgton
  20. +4
    18 June 2018 19: 58
    The article is of course an ordinary fake. What is the picture of the repository at the beginning of the article. At best, these are American B-61 bombs.
    The placement of nuclear warheads, if there is no talk of central (district) storage depots, usually happens on the territory of a military unit that can (and will) use such ammunition. It always has been. Placing a warehouse in three hours is stupid, if it is not just a central warehouse.

    Quote: voyaka uh
    "they have a" second wind "will open, thousands and a half ... And TNW will be discovered. Nearby" ////

    They will not pull one and a half (estimating the length of the rocket). But if you reduce the warhead, then another 300 kilometers can be added to those 450 that are:

    In something you are right. The mass and overall characteristics of the product are unlikely to increase the range by three times. Most likely it will be a range of less than 1000 km. This can be achieved in two ways. One costly one is replacing the fuel with a higher energy one, but for this, the missiles must be sent to the plant and they will essentially cease to be Iskanders in their original sense. The second option - less costly - will reduce all the head parts. For a special charge, this does not matter, but for a conventional warhead this is unacceptable. The point is a rocket that will have a OFBCH weighing 100-150 kg ....

    Quote: voyaka uh
    And for the nuclear weapons and build this warehouse. Logically. But all this is pointless. Kaliningrad itself is very vulnerable strategically .:

    One does not cancel the other. Even taking into account that the region is shot through by artillery, this is not a reason not to have such charges. Moreover, during the threatened period, they will most likely be no longer in warehouses, but in products.

    Quote: voyaka uh
    So many precise weapons will be aimed at the starting positions of the Iskander, which is doubtful that they will manage to fire ammunition:

    Most likely it will be aimed a lot. But in order to know where to shoot, it is necessary that intelligence be conducted on-line, with complex intelligence. The Iskander’s exit at the position, its aiming will take much less time than the WTO re-targeting it. Moreover, the basis of such a WTO will be delivered aviation weapons

    Quote: voyaka uh
    An ambitious round of an arms race is being developed. The USSR did not sustain such a race, it will be even more difficult for Russia to withstand. sad

    There is no turn. If you closely monitor such events, then you could pay attention to the fact that the outdated Point systems are replaced by Iskanders. With rare exceptions, they are deployed in new teams. Basically, instead of "Points". Planned equipment update.
    1. 0
      18 June 2018 22: 16
      “Basically instead of“ Points. ”Planned equipment upgrade." ////

      It’s clear ... but the trouble is that only the USSR / Russia had tactical BRs of this type before, and now everyone is starting to do them.
      And the case may end with swabbing such missiles at each other's positions ("counter-battery struggle"). And the distances are 400-500 km ...
  21. +1
    18 June 2018 20: 10
    Federation of American Scientists ...

    CIA renamed something? Or NSA?
  22. 0
    18 June 2018 20: 15
    So what? Kaliningrad is Russian, and Germany, Poland and other lice in the Baltic States are not American. So plug your cow, let it not moo!
  23. 0
    18 June 2018 20: 55
    dug up and repaired

    Hmm .. so it can .. project of Russian scientists what White Sea-Baltic Canal tongue , he is supervised simply at the highest level in the government



  24. +2
    18 June 2018 21: 20
    Yeah .. We found an ax behind the bench. Yours Not? Well, bring it down with your pictures. The territory of Russia - what is needed, is what we are doing. And they don’t intend to ask permission from any striped dogs.
  25. 0
    18 June 2018 22: 14
    The storage facility can be used for all types of nuclear munitions and not only for the Iskander, including artillery shells. Perhaps there is also ammunition for the Navy, although it is doubtful. But in any case, we’ll have time to shoot and launch and landmines when necessary. But it’s time for gays in Europe and their allies from fighters for the whole world, the whole world, and the exceptional nation on the planet to start worrying, but it’s better to have a tantrum just in case.
    1. 0
      19 June 2018 19: 19
      I will reveal a terrible secret. All land units in the Kaliningrad region belong to the coastal parts of the DKBF. So, there is probably ammunition for the Navy. smile
      1. 0
        19 June 2018 21: 28
        And will only the Border Administration defend the land border, which is much smaller than the Border Detachment under the USSR and does not even have group weapons in service? There are parts of the border cover there (they cannot but exist) and they do not relate to coastal defense.
        1. 0
          20 June 2018 02: 39
          You are not careful. This is not about coastal defense. When the 11th Guards was liquidated. The army, then all the units of the armed forces located in the Kaliningrad region, were transferred to the command of the DCBF and called the coastal forces of the fleet. The 11th Army Corps has already been created, but the subordination has probably been preserved. It is right, there is nothing to produce headquarters without any special reason.
  26. 0
    19 June 2018 08: 30
    We look forward to further provocations and bullshit against the Kaliningrad region. They want to chop off
  27. 0
    19 June 2018 09: 59
    And why not "injure" the neighbors, let a little sit on the validol.
  28. 0
    19 June 2018 11: 13
    Quote: voyaka uh
    “Basically instead of“ Points. ”Planned equipment upgrade." ////

    It’s clear ... but the trouble is that only the USSR / Russia had tactical BRs of this type before, and now everyone is starting to do them.
    And the case may end with swabbing such missiles at each other's positions ("counter-battery struggle"). And the distances are 400-500 km ...

    Well, not only that. The Americans also had missiles of this class - BR "Lance" (I’m not talking about earlier ones). It was planned in the early 90s the deployment of missiles with a range of "Iskander" from the French - RK "Hades". Well, many others had rockets of a similar class. The whole question now rests on the fact that Russia is now surrounded by countries not bound by any international treaties. And these countries have medium-range missiles. which Russia does not have due to the INF Treaty.

    Quote: slavaseven
    We look forward to further provocations and bullshit against the Kaliningrad region. They want to chop off

    And what do you see a provocation against the Kaliningrad region? In what they wrote about the availability of a warehouse? So this, sorry, is the secret of the General
  29. +3
    19 June 2018 16: 04
    US scientists say that Russia near Kaliningrad is engaged in the modernization of a bunker for storing nuclear warheads


    Umm, and what? No, really, and what? What Russia can’t be disposed of on its own territory? Or maybe the Americans are on foot on a sexual journey drown?
  30. 0
    17 July 2018 13: 30
    WE ALSO HAVE AND THE AERODROMCHIK IS FINISHING RECONSTRUCTION FOR RECEIVING SWAN BEARS ...