Military Review

US media talked about the American hypersonic weapon

73
American channel CNBC came out with a report on hypersonic weapons U.S.A. The material of the TV channel states that the American developers are not behind the Russian and Chinese in terms of creating this type of weapons. The report itself on the American television channel was clearly inspired by the latest information activity in the Russian Federation regarding the interruption of the Dagger hypersonic missile systems on the MiG-31 aircraft carriers on pilot combat duty.


From the material:
The United States does not lag behind Russia and China in terms of creating a "hypersound", since the current strategy of the United States is related to the development of non-nuclear missile technologies.



Russian "Dagger"


The report says that more recently, the United States recognized the significant advantage of “Russians and Chinese in creating hypersonic weapons,” but now “there is practically no such advantage.”

This statement contradicts recent publications in other American media, where, with reference to representatives of the US military, it was said that the United States now put in the first place not the development of hypersonic weapons, but the creation of weapons that are somehow related to the development of artificial intelligence. One example is artificial intelligence analyzing the huge amounts of information received by the Pentagon from reconnaissance drone cameras. Today, in the US military, they note that it is not possible to analyze this information for all 100% "in manual mode", and therefore many of the details of the footage remain unexplored.

CNBC publishes a statement by one of the American military experts, who claims that the US is currently engaged in "solving a more difficult task than Russia and China," namely, increasing the range and accuracy of hypersonic weapons. Stated that tested ammunition, which flew about 4 thousand. Km. He was compared with the Chinese "analog", which "did not fly and 2-x thousand. Km." About the speed of this rocket is not reported.

Previously, Lockheed Martin received nearly $ 1 billion from the US budget to create a prototype hypersonic cruise missile by the year 2023.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. zyzx
    zyzx 13 May 2018 06: 21
    +17
    What difference does it make, no. They said that all 103 missiles hit the target, the audience applauds, said they were not far behind, a storm of applause. Although an ordinary American doesn’t care at all, he, like a simple Russian, thinks how to feed his family, make repairs, and so on. And all these shows are for 70-100 year old uncles from the Senate and Parliament.
    1. A good one
      A good one 13 May 2018 06: 56
      +13
      Now with China, then with us we measure, we cheer up ourselves, then our Western partners. Create, good. Do not create, even better. The arms race is what this implies.
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev 13 May 2018 11: 05
        +1
        Quote: Not bad
        Now with China, then with us we measure, we cheer up ourselves, then our Western partners. Create, good. Do not create, even better. The arms race is what this implies.

        It looks like the stargazers have swallowed the bait. Let's see. HOW THE PRINTING MACHINE WILL SMOKE.
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 13 May 2018 10: 42
      0
      Quote: zyzx
      And all these shows are for 70-100 year old uncles from the Senate and Parliament.

      However, the nuclear suitcase is in the hands of just the parliaments and presidents. And the decision on the database is made not by ordinary Russians and Americans, but by these uncles, presidents and parliaments with senates.
      And taxes are paid by ordinary citizens, whose money goes to the defense industry.
  2. evil partisan
    evil partisan 13 May 2018 06: 25
    +6
    Lockheed Martin received nearly $ 1 billion from the U.S. budget to prototype a hypersonic cruise missile by 2023.

    200 lyam greens per year, chtoli ?? belay Yes, it's shaggy martinians Toko for coffee, cigarettes and PR enough yes . And then: not sure if that's enough ... what
    1. ANCIENT
      ANCIENT 13 May 2018 06: 44
      +4
      Greetings to the employee of the explosion of the adversary hi -For this money, how many trains with military equipment in the USA can be derailed? ?? what
      1. evil partisan
        evil partisan 13 May 2018 07: 36
        +2
        Quote: ANCIENT
        Worker Exploding Adversary

        Why only an explosion? We can do a lot of things ... repeat
        Quote: ANCIENT
        For this money, how many trains with military equipment in the usa itself can be derailed

        Yes, I will derail trains in Pyundosia for purely ideological reasons !! soldier But, of course, I won’t refuse 200 lyamas a year ... winked
        Hello to epic heroes! wink
        drinks
  3. dojjdik
    dojjdik 13 May 2018 06: 38
    +8
    we don’t have these stupid floating airfields, so the US can throw loot for this work and the more the better; we need a dagger to drown these "burns of fire"
    1. Don
      Don 13 May 2018 07: 55
      +4
      Quote: dojjdik
      we don’t have these stupid floating airfields, so the US can throw loot for this work and the more the better; we need a dagger to drown these "burns of fire"

      and have already sunk a lot? smile
      1. hrych
        hrych 13 May 2018 08: 17
        +8
        Quote: Donskoy
        and have already sunk a lot?

        Do we have a lot of them? Maybe you can do homework, better go to school tomorrow, rather than to a bulk meeting.
        1. Don
          Don 13 May 2018 10: 10
          +2
          have you been discharged yet? smile
      2. rbz05
        rbz05 13 May 2018 21: 09
        0
        What the hell do you need these barges for? It’s good to fight only with the natives. Unsuitable for global war. One of the reasons why we did not develop this direction. How long can AUG exist in isolation from support bases in conditions of intense fighting? In addition, it is not so difficult to drown such a fool.
    2. Ivan Tarava
      Ivan Tarava 13 May 2018 08: 18
      0
      What do you think will be the consequences for Russia after the sinking of the burning of Truman? The bomb shelters were all closed, no where to hide.
      1. Mountain shooter
        Mountain shooter 13 May 2018 08: 34
        +6
        But who will drown one aircraft carrier and stupidly wait what will follow? They will melt at once everything that they reach and "cut" out of everything that they fly - where it is necessary ... in the appropriate equipment. Bomb shelters? They certainly won’t save anyone. They can only prolong the agony.
        1. Ivan Tarava
          Ivan Tarava 13 May 2018 09: 06
          +3
          We will defeat everyone. All to dust.
          1. datur
            datur 13 May 2018 20: 33
            0
            good slogan !!!! by the way!!! wink the main thing is to fulfill it !! wink
      2. kventinasd
        kventinasd 13 May 2018 19: 21
        0
        Even if their entire fleet approaching our borders is sunk, the mattresses will not decide on a nuclear conflict. The local experts know that even two yards is enough to make a complete collapse in America.
      3. rbz05
        rbz05 13 May 2018 21: 12
        0
        Native. They don’t have enough bombs and missiles on us. But here we have it completely. And they want to live more than us. The most obsolete nation in the world.
  4. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 13 May 2018 06: 42
    +9
    How many do not say "halva", but it will not be sweeter in the mouth! Realizing that they are lagging behind in hypersonic weapons, in terms of their creation, they decided to just lie to the world that they are not far behind "just the Russians have gone far ahead" ?? fool
  5. Abram
    Abram 13 May 2018 07: 34
    +6
    The USA is the only one that showed a hypersonic sample. This is the X-51 Waverider. I consider that hypersonic weapons that fly 5 or more swoops from the moment of rapid completion of acceleration to hit the target. If you consider everything else as hypersound, then it’s been massively flying since the advent of high-speed air defense missiles, ICBMs and sub-caliber shells. then what race is this article talking about
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 13 May 2018 10: 16
      0
      This refers to the creation of missiles and aircraft with a scramjet.
      1. Abram
        Abram 13 May 2018 10: 52
        +1
        the article does not speak completely about the scramjet. just another text with a picture of a dagger trying to prove that he is also hypersound
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 13 May 2018 13: 15
          0
          Anyway, what kind of engine is a turbojet engine, ramjet engine speed of 5 or more Machs is hypersound.
        2. rbz05
          rbz05 13 May 2018 21: 14
          0
          And, what, 10 mach is not hypersound?
  6. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 13 May 2018 07: 34
    +2
    Let the blah-cry as much as you like! The main thing is that Kenzhik has already taken up duty, and gentlemen, associate professors and candidates continue to improve it! And that's great!
  7. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 13 May 2018 07: 40
    +5
    The US does not lag behind Russia and China in terms of creating a "hypersound"since the current strategy of the United States is related to the development of non-nuclear missile technologies.

    One problem ... belay Russia has nothing to drown ... request
    1. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 13 May 2018 08: 02
      +3
      But are power plants, hydroelectric power stations, railway junctions, communication centers, silo launchers not the goal?
      1. Ivan Tarava
        Ivan Tarava 13 May 2018 08: 22
        +4
        This does not require hypersound. As practice has shown a sufficiently calculated massive strike by cruise missiles. We don’t have as many Shells as launch cells on one Arly Burke type destroyer.
        1. kirgiz58
          kirgiz58 13 May 2018 09: 14
          +2
          Quote: Ivan Tarava
          We don’t have as many Shells as launch cells on one Arly Burke type destroyer.

          But we can reset all these “launching cells” to one start, and the Armor will not be used up.
          1. mvg
            mvg 13 May 2018 13: 54
            0
            All 70 destroyers and 20 cruisers and 4 Ohio and 10 aircraft carriers at once ... Well, we are also strong .. It becomes easier on the soul.
            1. BastaKarapuzik And
              BastaKarapuzik And 13 May 2018 14: 49
              +1
              Quote: mvg
              All 70 destroyers and 20 cruisers and 4 Ohio and 10 aircraft carriers at once ... Well, we are also strong .. It becomes easier on the soul.

              70 destroyers is, of course, a lot. This is a lot even for the States. Thanks to this armada, a huge hole is formed in the US budget.
              In connection with the recent bombing, some expert, I don’t remember the last name (Solovyov’s guest seems), said that to destroy Russia’s potential it takes 3000 “tomahawks” a day, for (I'm afraid to tell a lie) month.
              If the information is correct, the indicated destroyers will be enough only on the first day of the war (they will carry air defense and missile defense missiles in their launch cells, not just tomahawks).
              For comparison, in Vietnam from 65 to 72 years were dropped .... 5 million tons of bombs.
              The small earth has become.
              1. mvg
                mvg 14 May 2018 00: 39
                0
                Different experts, different opinions. Yugoslav air defense quickly spread. And the south in the police department was not the last army. In my opinion they were considered the second most powerful.
                A lot then from Vietnam left?
                They need to destroy the ICBMs, and before Europe they don’t care.
        2. Vol4ara
          Vol4ara 13 May 2018 11: 14
          +2
          Quote: Ivan Tarava
          This does not require hypersound. As practice has shown a sufficiently calculated massive strike by cruise missiles. We don’t have as many Shells as launch cells on one Arly Burke type destroyer.

          The Russian Federation has a full-fledged layered air defense, with the deployment of PU both around the perimeter and within the country. And the Russian Federation has a PCR with a range of 2000 km, the depth of defense of the AUG 1500 if that
          1. mvg
            mvg 13 May 2018 14: 01
            0
            And what are these anti-ship missiles and how to direct them, at least for 500 km. Blessed, calms himself.
          2. Corporal Pupkin
            Corporal Pupkin 13 May 2018 14: 09
            0
            About possession of Russia "full, layered air defense"
            I'd... "bashfully SILENT!" crying
            Alas, only OBJECT, and then ...
            suitable, except that it is only GUARANTEED from Ukrainian corn aviation fend off .... request
      2. rbz05
        rbz05 13 May 2018 21: 16
        0
        Is there enough rockets? And then where will they hide themselves?
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 13 May 2018 07: 57
    +4
    We were praised, we applauded ourselves and of course did not forget about the extra money. America - local spills, edrena louse!
  9. Simon
    Simon 13 May 2018 08: 09
    +1
    Quote: ANCIENT
    How many do not say "halva", but it will not be sweeter in the mouth! Realizing that they are lagging behind in hypersonic weapons, in terms of their creation, they decided to just lie to the world that they are not far behind "just the Russians have gone far ahead" ?? fool

    And that the Americans have experienced something like that? I didn’t hear anything. Maybe they let the "duck"? request
    1. ANCIENT
      ANCIENT 13 May 2018 08: 18
      +2
      Tales from Hollywood, the heading "we all can, but little we can"! crying because the Russians interfere, as always! !! belay
    2. telobezumnoe
      telobezumnoe 13 May 2018 08: 20
      0
      moreover, they have been experiencing ten years of scramjet engine, and what we pretend to be hypersound, generally with 57 similar technologies fly, even the Indians boasted similar, only unlike us they are not limited to rsdrp and they do all this from ground installations
      1. ANCIENT
        ANCIENT 13 May 2018 09: 30
        +3
        And in Russian, so to speak articulate, can you explain your chaotic thought? belay We created the scramjet when Russia was still part of the USSR - we were the first, the first and remained in terms of creating hypersonic weapons!
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 13 May 2018 10: 19
      0
      Yes, they tested, last year the demonstrator is a hypersonic drone drone reconnaissance SR 72
      1. Gene Concrete
        Gene Concrete 13 May 2018 11: 02
        0
        The X-51 is probably closer to the topic.
  10. Penzyac
    Penzyac 13 May 2018 08: 19
    +2
    Hollywood to help them ...
  11. APASUS
    APASUS 13 May 2018 08: 25
    +1
    Whether the Russians have this weapon or not is not so important according to the reaction of the Americans. A wave has arisen in the media, the main thing is to launch the duck and it begins to grow into details sucked from the finger. In fact, nothing is known.
    This is exactly the moment when the Americans divorced the leadership of the USSR for huge money, with the SDI program
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 13 May 2018 10: 27
      +2
      An analogue of the Vanguard, they also tested the HTV 2 orbital maneuvering warhead -
      Estimated values ​​of the speed of hypersonic “slip” in low orbit / in the upper atmosphere: 17 ... 22 Mach (5,8 ... 7,5 km / s)
      Diameter in the tail: not more than the diameter of the fairing of the Minotaur-IV launch vehicle = 2,34 m
      Mass: not more than the delivered mass of the LV Minotaur-IV = 1725 kg, expected aerodynamic heating of the surface: 1930 ° C
  12. Tektor
    Tektor 13 May 2018 10: 21
    +1
    It is stated that the ammunition was tested, which flew about 4 thousand km. It was compared with the Chinese "analog", which "did not fly even 2 thousand km." The speed of this rocket is not reported.
    This statement is designed for suckers? Ballistic missiles fly both long distances and at high speeds, but this does not make them hypersonic weapons. The main difference of which are: - non-ballistic flight path at altitudes up to 118 km, - controllability along the entire path and - high accuracy in this regard (standard deviation of about 10 m).
    1. Corporal Pupkin
      Corporal Pupkin 13 May 2018 14: 19
      0
      Do not "profane workers"!
      (their technically illiterate "definitions" of hypersonic weapons) laughing
      You confuse HIGH PRECISION weapons with hypersonic...
      and, the "ballistic trajectory" (as well as the standard deviation of the ammunition) in no way determines the hypersonic characteristics of the weapon, the only characteristic of which is hypersonic SPEED ammunition in the zone of his probable interception ....
      For what Megatonic hypersonic "head" accuracy of 10 meters ???????????? wassat
  13. Old26
    Old26 13 May 2018 11: 34
    +2
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    But who will drown one aircraft carrier and stupidly wait what will follow? They will melt at once everything that they reach and "cut" out of everything that they fly - where it is necessary ... in the appropriate equipment. Bomb shelters? They certainly won’t save anyone. They can only prolong the agony.

    Yeah. especially if the rest will be at a distance of 10-12 thousand kilometers from the dagger’s base, it’s time it’s time to end the raving about the sinking of an aircraft carrier and all that. Attack of a warship of a country with which you are not at war - this is the very same cousus belli. That is the reason for the war. And no one will wait for us to drown 3-5-7 aircraft carriers. Such an attack is all. then the doomsday weapon will go on course and the whole earth will turn into a place where it will be impossible to live. unless some savages in Africa or Polynesia survive.
    I think for those who want to "drown the aircraft carriers all at once" there is a less painful way of suicide for others. Rope...

    Quote: ANCIENT
    How many do not say "halva", but it will not be sweeter in the mouth! Realizing that they are lagging behind in hypersonic weapons, in terms of their creation, they decided to just lie to the world that they are not far behind "just the Russians have gone far ahead" ?? fool

    In fact, if you do not read only our press and do not watch only our television, you can know that in the past decade, Americans achieved speeds of 8-11M. Yes, they didn’t fully carry out their programs from the devices, but the Americans already achieved 10M on the “Dagger” that they were boasting about. Moreover, they had problems that they did not seem to solve, but we also have no guarantee that the “Dagger” flew at the declared range and speed. Moreover, they have problems - we have not yet resolved either. Their devices had geo-sonic ramjet engines. Our “Dagger” is a banal solid-propellant ballistic missile. We have not achieved any scientific breakthroughs in this regard. The speeds in 5-6M are really mastered by us, and the head of the company that deals with this also spoke about this.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 13 May 2018 13: 19
      0
      But on the scramjet, in the concept of a passenger hypersonic airliner, they achieved positive results
    2. Corporal Pupkin
      Corporal Pupkin 13 May 2018 13: 46
      0
      You, maybe, bye (mentally), and, "mastered" speed 5-6eМand US ...
      a long time ago ! “mastered” speeds OVER 15M! laughing
      CAREFULLY see HERE:
      http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/53t6/53
      t6.shtml
    3. SETTGF
      SETTGF 14 May 2018 10: 12
      0
      Old26! How many of you are writing incorrect information ?! It’s not enough to reach hypersonic, the most important thing is to keep it as long as possible, and the Americans couldn’t do this because of aerodynamic heating, and they still haven’t been able to control a hypersonic flying device through a plasma layer ... And the Dagger complex is controlled by throughout the flight - the brains decide everything!
  14. fa2998
    fa2998 13 May 2018 12: 10
    0
    Quote: dojjdik
    we don’t have these stupid floating airfields, so the US can throw loot for this work and the more the better; we need a dagger to drown these "burns of fire"

    Quote: hrych
    Quote: Donskoy
    and have already sunk a lot?

    Do we have a lot of them? Maybe you can do homework, better go to school tomorrow, rather than to a bulk meeting.

    Maybe I did not teach physics well, but I repeat the question (hooray - comments do not count) -HOW A ROCKET GOING ON A HYPERSONIC SURROUNDED BY A PLASMA WILL SEARCH A SHIP IN THE SEA? If the plasma is in the way, then the Dagger can destroy the aircraft carrier only at the wall, in the port or at the BASE! hi
    1. Corporal Pupkin
      Corporal Pupkin 13 May 2018 13: 11
      +1
      Were Positive results were obtained on the radio transparency of the plasma skin layer of the shock front (at certain frequencies), therefore ... "IMPOSSIBLE has become POSSIBLE"! Only ... shhhhhhhh! NO ONE! ! wink
    2. SETTGF
      SETTGF 14 May 2018 10: 17
      0
      fa2998! The Dagger complex is controlled throughout the flight of the hypersonic apparatus ... The Americans have not been able to do this until now! Therefore, do not give out information that is long outdated!
  15. Berkut24
    Berkut24 13 May 2018 12: 11
    0
    It seems that the generals in the United States are trying to develop weapons exclusively under the influence of Hollywood crafts. Initially, there were star wars that spilled over into the SDI, now artificial intelligence, inspired by the Terminator. But with hypersonic weapons, the trouble is - Hollywood has not yet created the desired film, the generals are in creative prostration ...
  16. Corporal Pupkin
    Corporal Pupkin 13 May 2018 12: 50
    +1
    bully Well amers Putin "Dagger"! good
    For several years, their hypersonic 3.14-ska turned out to be shorter than that of "Uncle Pu" ... lol
  17. Secretparadox
    Secretparadox 13 May 2018 13: 30
    0
    So far, neither Russia, nor China, nor the United States have talked further. It is completely unclear whether the dagger really has hypersound or is it just a way to play with muscles, and the complex gains similar speed only on the final part of the trajectory. The dispute will resolve only time.
  18. net0103net
    net0103net 13 May 2018 15: 41
    0
    Blah blah blah blah blah ... They need to be hit, otherwise technology will leak along with the benefits .. and that’s it ..
  19. Old26
    Old26 13 May 2018 17: 17
    +1
    Quote: Corporal Pupkin
    You, maybe, bye (mentally), and, "mastered" speed 5-6eМand US ...
    a long time ago ! “mastered” speeds OVER 15M! laughing
    CAREFULLY see HERE:
    http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/53t6/53
    t6.shtml

    Maybe before showing OUR SUPERGENCIES problems for a change DROP YOURSELF IN THE HEAD the difference between rocket engine (solid fuel) and AIR REACTIVEwhere the oxidizing agent is atmospheric air Mr. Corporal Pupkin Vasily Ivanovich?????

    Quote: fa2998
    HOW A ROCKET GOING ON A HYPERSONIC SURROUNDED BY A PLASMA WILL SEARCH A SHIP IN THE SEA?

    Do you, Andrey, seriously hope to get an answer to this and other questions from the daggers of the "Dagger"? Don't expect

    Quote: SecretParadox
    So far, neither Russia, nor China, nor the United States have talked further. It is completely unclear whether the dagger really has hypersound or is it just a way to play with muscles, and the complex gains similar speed only on the final part of the trajectory. The dispute will resolve only time.

    Purely technically, the "Dagger" really has a hypersound. If we take the Iskander as the basis, then it has a maximum speed of about 6-7M. Why launch the hypersonic “product” itself from a supersonic aircraft - I can’t even imagine. Anyway, with such a mass of cargo on the suspension, the speed of the carrier will have limitations. as knowledgeable people say about 1,9M. Starting from such a carrier plus its own speed of 6-7M could theoretically give an increase in speed. But all this takes place only until the rocket burns out fuel. And this is about 60-70 seconds. In these 60-70 seconds, even at a speed of 10M, the rocket will fly to a distance of about 250 km and rise to a height of about 40-60 km. What next? What's next? The MiG-31 radar has a target detection range of about 400-600 km. Who will give him target designation at a distance of 2000 km is unknown. Yes, on an inertial, it will fly in that direction, it’s without talking, but when it decreases to the dense layers of the atmosphere it will start to lose speed, which will become much less than the 10M that our president spoke about, talking about this system (he said that it can fly at a speed of 10M in dense layers of the atmosphere)
    First, her speed will start to drop. Nobody has canceled air resistance yet. And at hypersonic speeds, nothing but an inertial is unlikely to work for her. So far, we can’t even support communication in such conditions (communication interruption on landing descent vehicles is a reality). And there’s no need to talk about working in these conditions with a radar seeker. In fact, this rocket. entering into dense layers will be ordinary supersonic. She simply does not have any ways to maintain the maximum achieved speed. The speed will fall ... then what is its breakthrough and the “prodigy” of which everyone is talking?
    1. flicker
      flicker 13 May 2018 20: 14
      +1
      The end of radio silence - a new method for communicating with the spacecraft - everything is solved: if that https://m.geektimes.com/post/285478/
      "Soviet approach (implemented).

      - Weakly directed microwave emitters - airborne antennas with heated thermal protection and molten material for thermal protection.
      - On-board antennas with thermal protection, the original design of which has a reduced sensitivity of its radio transparency to the effects of high-temperature aerodynamic heating.
      - Methods of radio lighting AO for the conditions of aerodynamic heating, providing a reduction of losses in the heated AO.
      - The use of "long" heat-resistant antennas carried out behind the plasma sheath film. "
    2. SETTGF
      SETTGF 14 May 2018 10: 58
      0
      Old26! Do not write about what you do not know! Firstly, the dagger hypersonic missile flies at a speed of 10M throughout the entire range of its flight, secondly it is controlled throughout the flight, thirdly it can receive target designation from satellites, fourthly it is not necessary to assume that you don’t know ... And do not make yourself "experienced" ... ugly!
  20. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 13 May 2018 17: 26
    +2
    At the moment, the United States is engaged in "solving a more complex problem than Russia and China", namely: increasing the range and accuracy of hypersonic weapons

    haha three times ... What would increase the accuracy, you can create a weapon first?
    And the creation of AI-based systems ... Good thing ... no words. Only in this aspiration is the idea firmly established that there would be nothing to do and no responsibility to bear .. This is very American or feminine somehow: "I have nothing to do with it, it’s itself ..."
    And I also remembered how a bear in the forest lifted a programmer ... IT genius knew so much, but the bear was fucked ....
  21. flicker
    flicker 13 May 2018 17: 30
    +1
    Trindyat, they will receive hyperspeed only when it ceases to be a scientific breakthrough - when it will be available to many. They have already ruined their education, they produce PIPL, capable of nothing. They invite young talented scientists from all over the world, create comfortable living conditions for them (they need to live in high - the main principle of their life), young scientists live in high, they no longer need any scientific efforts.
    Rather, I believe that hyper-speed will be available: Korea, China, Japan and even Israel, but not to geldings. The past generation of them could, the current American people - no. America is losing its position as a global technological locomotive.
  22. Captain45
    Captain45 13 May 2018 17: 43
    0
    Why are you all here- Dagger, Dagger, hypersound, that’s what smart people write about all this:
    An effective antidote found against Russian hypersonic missiles
    Johann Weiss 10 May 16: 56
    The latest Russian hypersonic dagger missile system is outdated, barely accepted.
    The creation, successful testing and putting on a pilot combat duty of the “Dagger” was announced on March 1 of the 2018 of the year by Vladimir Putin in a message to the Federal Assembly.
    It is indicated that the complex includes a carrier aircraft and a combat missile traveling at hypersonic speeds. In fact, the carrier aircraft, which, according to experts, will become the Su-57 fighter-bomber (or one of its modifications, at the moment - the MiG-31 long-range fighter-interceptor, capable of speeds up to 3 400 km / h ), will deliver a hypersonic missile to the discharge point, after which the hypersonic missile of the ARC “Dagger” will develop a flight speed of the order of 12250 km / h, or almost 3.5 km / sec., and, while maneuvering, depending on the terrain conditions, it will head towards specified int .
    Given the flight speed, a hypersonic missile will be able to reach the most distant target (more than 2000 kilometers) in less than 10 minutes, which makes the air defense and missile defense systems completely useless, since the interception of such missiles is almost impossible.
    The appearance of hypersonic weapons in the arsenal of the Russian army caused a lot of bewilderment among various military units, in particular, we are talking about NATO, since the first American prototype of a hypersonic missile is supposed to be tested only in the 2019 year, while the weapon itself will go into service with the United States no earlier 2021 of the year, which indicates the fact that Russia seized the military advantage with a difference of several years.
    However, an effective means of counteracting the “Dagger”, nullifying all its advantages and making it, according to an integral estimate, no more dangerous than the 50-100-kilogram free-falling high-explosive bomb, exists now.
    It is based on the idea of ​​creating an electromagnetic field with suspended military-conductive elements suspended in it in the final section of the missile flight path (at a distance from 500 to 100 km, in the so-called pre-terminal zone).
    When the field strength changes, these elements, making fluctuations simultaneously in two orthogonal planes, following the vectors of the electric and magnetic components, create a zone of continuous destruction for all objects whose linear dimensions are more than 1.25 x 2.5 inches.
    At a frequency of 2-2.5 GHz, each object with dimensions larger than those specified will experience at least 50 times, moving at a speed of 1-2 km / s, and at least 30-35 times, when moving at a speed of up to 6 km / s.
    Thus, the Dagger rocket with its ~ 3.5 km / s will experience an average of up to 40 impacts.
    In this case, a guaranteed defeat is ensured in the case of 10-12, maximum - 20 [impacts - ed.].
    In other words, the “Dagger” rocket, or similar, will be destroyed twice more 100 km to the target or much earlier.
    This technology was developed back in the USSR, in one of the closed research institutes [according to some reports, we are talking about the Institute of winter ice-culling and seal farming located in Taimyr, supposedly dealing with the problem of reproduction of biological resources of the North - ed.], And came to the West back in 1999, together with a team of developers who moved to the Poltava International Zoo Developing Educated Center "in full force, where they continued to experiment under the Obolon program.
    At the same time, it became known that the striking elements had already been stored in quantities sufficient to create at least 2 000 areas, with a front width of up to 300 km and a depth of up to 500 km, capable of repeatedly blocking all directions of a possible strike on the territory of the USSR.
    The bookmarking was carried out mainly on the territory of Ukraine, as the most potentially vulnerable region. Given this circumstance, of the 5 billion combat elementals, the 4.04 billion were stored there.
    The single elemental itself is a plate of stainless steel reinforced with monofilaments of volcanic glass - obsidian.
    The shape, size, and most importantly, the geometry of the curly cutouts in the center of the plate allows it to stay in a given area for an unlimited time in standby mode, provided that there is continuous feeding of a configuring reverse tunnel field with a power of 3 GW, and up to 12 hours in combat mode , with increasing power to 6 GW, per one covered object and / or area.
    It is interesting to note that defective plates that have not passed military acceptance were sent for sale under the guise of blades for the Sunrise safety razor, and were in short supply.
    This fact, when properly interpreted, is necessary and sufficient evidence for those who understand.
    https://cont.ws/@ottuda/941187
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 13 May 2018 19: 03
      0
      Probably this crazy idea was abandoned in view of the enormous energy costs, as well as the harmful effects of magnetic fields on the environment and infrastructure.
      1. Serg4545
        Serg4545 14 May 2018 06: 51
        +1
        This is a banter, dear!
        A joke of humor)
        1. Captain45
          Captain45 14 May 2018 13: 07
          0
          Quote: Serg4545
          This is a banter, dear!
          A joke of humor)

          good
    2. SETTGF
      SETTGF 14 May 2018 11: 05
      0
      Captain45! Teach physics and do not write nonsense, assumptions and fables!
      1. Captain45
        Captain45 14 May 2018 13: 06
        0
        Quote: SETTGF
        Captain45! Teach physics and do not write nonsense, assumptions and fables!

        laughing laughing laughing
        Read carefully yes
  23. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 13 May 2018 17: 47
    0
    Well, they said that they were not far behind: so what? The goals of the application are completely different. Our hypersound (take a "dagger", correct, if not right) to destroy aircraft carriers. How many aviks do we have? And the amers? They have a good part of the strategy on the use of aircraft carriers: to knock them out - a significant advantage will be formed. All the advantages of an aircraft-carrying formation during the destruction of an aircraft carrier lose their meaning: why are there a bunch of escort and support vessels if there is no one they provide? According to others: the entire missile defense system built (over several decades and for crazy grandmas) around Russia is powerless against some types of hypersonic weapons. They will create (created) something similar: so what? Have we created a similar system (PRO)? Not. Will we be the first to attack? Not that I strongly doubt it, but I do not believe at all. As a result, they have an invulnerable means of attack, and so does ours: nothing will change.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 14 May 2018 10: 09
      0
      "Our hypersound (let's take a" dagger ", correct, if not right) to destroy aircraft carriers." ///

      You're not right. The dagger is an air-based Iskander. He will allow
      destroy important stationary targets at much greater depths
      enemy territory compared to ground Iskander
      (not an external medium-range BR ban treaty.)
      Like the ground Iskander, the Dagger is not capable of hitting a moving target.
      The coordinates of the target are invested in its software (by inertial or GLONASS) before launch, in advance. You cannot change them. GOS is capable in the last second to correct a rocket vertically falling on the target by several tens of meters, no more.
  24. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 14 May 2018 10: 01
    0
    Boeing and Rolls-Royce are now creating this
    combined engine: direct-flow and rocket
    for civil and military use.