Military Review

How to cut the anaconda loop?

162
Events in recent years suggest that the West went on its last trip. Hike to the East. Hike to Russia. The stakes of this campaign are for thousands of years the expected victory over disobedient Rus. But the outcome of this campaign may be three: the first, expected by the West: the destruction of the most recalcitrant people on Earth; the second is a combat draw, when only radioactive mutants remain on the planet; the third is that everything will happen as always, i.e. again, as every time during the previous millennium, there will be the same “rake”. Only this time, the rake would smash its stubborn forehead.




What are they doing to us?

At firstWe are surrounded by military bases with bridgeheads for a disarming lightning strike. From Alaska and Okinawa to Scandinavia through the entire south, south-east and south-west. Anaconda loop! That's just the Arctic, apparently, will not be able to grab. Although it remains one of the most dangerous directions from the point of view of a nuclear missile strike. In nature, the anaconda acts as a strangulation method. It seemed to Western strategists that this was not enough, and they decided to eliminate this “flaw” of nature and surrounded us with bacteriological laboratories. weaponsfor more details, see [1].

The critical moment for the “anaconda” will come at the moment of equipping the shock military bridgeheads in Ukraine. This will mean that the time "H" is set, and the countdown timer is started. In the meantime, the anaconda splashes with poison, as evidenced by the recurring diseases of livestock and poultry in the vicinity of biological laboratories, then the epidemic of severe influenza in unusual seasons.

Secondlygeopolitical pressure. A tough struggle for influence over the elites of neighboring countries is deployed around the perimeter of Russia. Where is the whip, and where is the carrot, our geostrategic "partner" is forcing these countries to unite in the struggle against Russia. It compels to support military, economic, diplomatic, communication, humanitarian, informational and even scientific sanctions in order to increase pressure on our country.

New NATO bases are emerging, exercises are being organized, comprehensive economic measures are being introduced, diplomats are being sent, reasons for disrupting the construction of gas pipelines, air traffic violations, sending down cultural exchanges, unprecedented information war launched, and our leading scientists cannot publish their articles in international scientific publications, even in collaboration with Western colleagues.

A new “velvet revolution” has already been organized in Armenia. Kazakhstan instead of the Cyrillic alphabet introduces Latin. In the mode of unstable "connecting rod" is Belarus (in fairness, it should be noted that our structures also had a hand in this). In Ukraine, its own autocephalous church under the slogan of Orthodoxy is legalized in order to completely oust the Russian Patriarchate from the “Square”.

Thirdly, information war. Its goal is to discredit Russia in the eyes of the public in Western countries, but not only. The goal is to bring the country's reputation to the level of non-manpower, make it an outcast, humiliating as much as possible in the international arena. This prepares a platform of public opinion for the real elimination of Russia from the system of international relations. Details on the information war are set out in [2]. As a repeat, I’ll say: no matter how justified we are on organized provocations, slander and lies, it only worsens our position on the information front. Because in the information war there is no defense, there is only an offensive. And we do not lead him: we do not know how or do not want, and maybe we don’t allow it.

Fourthly, the economic situation of the country. Despite the statements of state statistics on emerging economic growth, its true position is unenviable. The actions of certain circles that are at the helm of economic structures have led to the fact that now we measure economic growth not for its best years, but for the worst. We declare growth relative to the previous fall. In addition, the very concept of "growth" does not fully characterize its real situation. Details on the difference between economic growth and economic development can be found here [3]. In this article, it is laid out in detail what and how they are doing with our economy, simultaneously distorting the true picture of the world.

A typical example: Russia in recent years regularly collects record grain yields. It does not matter that the best varieties are sold abroad, for domestic consumption in which case it will be enough. But there is nowhere to store grain. A significant part of grain elevators, grain-receiving enterprises and granaries was built in 50 – 70-s of the last century, their wear averages 70 – 80 percent. At the time of construction, existing technologies were used, which are now obsolete.

Many grain elevators are located in areas separated from the harvesting sites, in some cases even the owners of grain elevators are unknown. There are not enough wagons for the delivery of grain to the seaports, and the available rolling stock is fairly worn out, requiring replacement or repair. But it is often used to transport other bulk goods. It is said that Russia's revenue from the sale of grain exceeds even the proceeds from the sale of weapons. And who gets this revenue? Agricultural production is in private hands, including in the ownership of foreign companies. Therefore, grain abroad is sold through offshore with all the consequences for the budget. The owners of the infrastructure are not interested in its development, but in squeezing everything that can be squeezed out of the industry for their profit.

Fifthly, "Fifth column". It is no secret that a significant part of our “elite” (sorry for the cynological term, we now have so accepted) was on the hook of the Western special services. This is due to the presence in foreign lands of real estate, business, residence and training of family members of elite representatives of Russian society. About the imminent danger of this trap, the author warned back in 2000 year in his work [4]. However, no one listened, and now they have fallen, like chickens in the flap, see “the law on dubious capital” of Great Britain and the Kremlin State Department lists. Being on the hook of the authorities of our strategic competitors is very, very difficult to defend national interests - to save their property.

At sixthgenetic warfare This war covers not only the creation of targeted genetic weapons to reduce fertility, the spread of nonspecific diseases, but also work with food. Genetically modified products are only part of this war. Did you know that up to 95 percent of seeds for sowing vegetables are imported from abroad? Moreover, these are proprietary names, so we do not have the right to withdraw seeds from ripened fruits in order to plant them next year on our own or to derive new varieties on their basis. Therefore, one day we can be left without our vegetables. A huge hole in the country's food security!

Seventh, sanctions war. The purpose of the sanctions adopted by Western countries, primarily the United States, is to change Russia's foreign and domestic policy by causing unacceptable damage to the country's finances, as well as to a certain influential circle of people, its economy, and international reputation. In addition, they aim to reduce the standard of living of the population to provoke political instability, internal pressure on the country's power, up to a change in the current political regime, activation of lobbying pressure on the power [5].

Despite the consolidation of the masses around the figure of V.V. Putin after the annexation of the Crimea, the effect of the sanctions gradually accumulates. And the effect of the retaliatory sanctions of Russia against the countries of the West only strengthens these negative tendencies - we can not oppose anything substantial to the West that could affect their determination in the unleashed economic war. This is caused by a general decline in the standard of living, disappointment from powerlessness against provocations not only from powerful countries, but also from Ukraine’s recently fraternal country. In great detail, even in a meticulous way, an analysis of the impact of sanctions on the country's economy is presented here [5], up to one hundred pages of small text with diagrams and explanatory graphs. More than fifty sources were processed here, therefore there is practically nothing to add to such a detailed and competent analysis.

Thus, the counting of missiles, ships and aircraft of the opposing sides in Syria is only a small part of the overall picture of the world in which our Motherland found itself. The calculation of the Americans that the entire information space after the bombing of Syria will be filled with triumphant reports about the success of the Soviet air defense systems forty years ago, was fully justified - there are no numbers inspired by the comments.

However, the global goal strike achieved. Its essence was to bring to the potential allies of Russia, as well as to the buyers of its weapons, the simple idea that neither Russia's weapons, nor even the presence of Russian troops in the territory of your states will protect you from our bombs and missiles. Knocked 71 rocket from 102's? Is it 70 percent? Well, we will send 500 rockets, how many you will kill? And out of a thousand rockets and bombs, how many will you kill? Found two unexploded rockets? It is still unknown why they did not explode. Maybe they slipped the “doll” as a filling, although no one can know for sure.

In Syria, reconnaissance is being conducted by the United States with some Allied participation, and the main battle is a complex, carefully thought out and balanced against the risks that they may face, unleashing a fight with Russia.

What can we oppose in the struggle for survival?

Note that we have not even started this fight. I want to skip the military component, there are enough materials on this account. As for the new types of weapons that the president presented in his report to the Federal Assembly, they are in different degrees of alert - from testing to the adoption procedure, and this is far from widespread introduction of troops into combat training and combat duty. Therefore, our opponents hurried with the increasing pressure on Russia, their experts say that in five years it will be impossible to defeat Russia in the war.

With our allies, we are unconvincing, our natural partners support us in words, but in fact it turns out far from always. Too much fear has been caught up on them, and they have their own elite, which, like our fellows, is set on the same hook. To acquire new and return old allies, you must create the appropriate conditions. First of all, there should be economic benefit and security from external threats of such an alliance with Russia. But while there is no first factor, the second is not so obvious against the background of the first.

Informational confrontation is sufficiently said in the source I mentioned above [2]. It can only be stated that the information war is conducted by us incorrectly, we get bogged down in the details of provocations, we are constantly justifying ourselves, like a schoolchild in front of a strict teacher. At the same time, we skip blow by blow: from the Boeing and Skripale to the unfortunate vessel Nord.

At the same time, the situation should be such that no one could even think of inflicting harm to a Russian citizen. And we are beaten everywhere with a loud fanfare, highlighting all the accompanying humiliations. To top it off, they write that Israel has already announced the destruction of the C-300 in the event of its delivery to the armed forces of Syria. And they will destroy! There were reports that they did this a few years ago.

On the economy. “The business who created this business cannot modernize business” (Lee Iacocca). Therefore, the current team of the economic bloc, if it remains, will only exacerbate our already deplorable situation. But it will be even worse if the character who had previously expelled from the government, who had developed a rotten economic development strategy up to the 2035 year, returns.

It is time for new technologies to manage economic development. I emphasize economic development, not economic growth. And in the current team it is difficult to identify a sufficiently competent figure in this area, as I wrote in my articles published on this resource earlier.

I don’t feel much sense from endless forums, only additional expenditures of the budget, which, most likely, are already related to expenditures for measures of “economic growth”, “innovations” and “digitalization”.

A lot has been said about the “fifth column”. But where are the real measures to neutralize it? It seems that corruption has somehow started to fight against corruption, but the “fifth column”, together with the liberal opposition, is putting sticks in the wheels of real economic development. And we have liberals on all state television channels, and with them invited Western and Ukrainian “experts” receive royalties for the dirty lies they pour out on our country.

As for the genetic war, try to contact the FANO for funding at least research this formidable factor. Four hundred scientists of the Russian Academy of Sciences have already written a letter to the president about the state of fundamental science. He was sent to FANO, to which they complained.

About sanctions. We will not be saved from sanctions. They will only strengthen and tighten, becoming more sophisticated. Counter sanctions special action on the West will not make a mark. Even if they bring any losses, they will simply supplement the money, the money machine in their hands. Moreover, counter-sanctions advertised in the media can have negative consequences (especially in the long term) for us more than for our competitors. At the same time, it is difficult to hope for common sense on the part of our developers of countermeasures - from the speeches of most of them on thematic talk shows, hair sometimes stands on end.

And one more rather strange phenomenon is worth mentioning, since it began to acquire a systemic character. Recently, there have been reports of the actual elimination or physical reprisal of people directly related to the security of the country. This includes Valery Pshenichny, who died in the Russian Ilon Mask SIZO, Boris Obnosov, Director General of the Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation (hypersound), and the detained Alexander Gomzin, Director General of the T. Simonov, specializing in the development of unmanned aircraft ("the mysterious Russian UAV") [6].

A normal person is unlikely to think that the CEO, however selfish he may be, will take the liberty to engage in risky fraudulent operations with the finances of government defense orders. And why are state secrets so helpless before ordinary robbers? I do not want to think, but a comparison comes to mind with the destruction of the main developers of the Iranian nuclear industry by one powerful special service. But even if this is not the case, in any case the damage from such cases of the country's defense is obvious. Although at the level of technical results of development, at least at the level of the moral and psychological state of production teams, from which intense creative work is required.

In the dry residue: we have already launched a full-scale complex (want - hybrid, want - network-centric) war. It includes many components, the main of which we briefly reviewed. This is a war of survival of only one of the parties and help us expect from nowhere. The hope of restoring normal relations with the Western world is also unlikely, subject to our sovereignty, state integrity and strategic interests. First of all, the Western world itself does not want this.

What to do in current conditions?

Option 1: to fight decisively and offensively with the forces and means that are available to us, and which, at least, are comparable to the forces and means of our counterpart, causing him unacceptable damage. The time we have at our disposal, and very little of it, needs to be used to strengthen our competitive advantages.

2 option: respond to aggressive actions to a point, taking care of the minimum damage to yourself and keeping the door open for restoring relations, at the same time trying to save their foreign property and money.

Option 3: take the point of view of the liberal part of Russian society, and “lie down” under the West, losing its own identity.

Offer other options!

Reference: In nature, to defeat the anaconda, it is necessary to chop off her head.

Sources:
1. Surrounded by infection // https://newinform.com/25003-okruzheny-zarazoi-vokrug-rossii-mnozhatsya-bazy-nato-i-laboratorii-ssha
2. Is Russia a militant country? It's a lie! // https://topwar.ru/139180-voyna-bez-pravil.html.
3. Inflation or fraud? How to distinguish the first from the second // https://topwar.ru/139896-chto-takoe-inflyaciya-i-pochemu-ona-ne-moshennichestvo.html.
4. Lukashev A.V., Ponidelko A.V. Black PR as a way of mastering power, or Bomb for an image maker. SPb., Business press, 2000.
5. http://voprosik.net/chem-zapad-mozhet-davit-rossiyu.
6. The developer of the “mysterious Russian drone” // https://lenta.ru/news/2018/04/20/arestgomzina was arrested.
Author:
162 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 22 2018 05: 56
    +6
    Found two unexploded missiles? It is still unknown why they did not burst. Maybe they slipped a “doll” as a filling, although for sure no one can know this.

    By the way, our Russian Defense Ministry does not comment on this. Maybe there is such a fact, but maybe not.
    But basically it’s hard to disagree with the author on other facts, especially in the sub-article “What are they doing with us?” and the seven points listed. And in claiming to the early media that there is already a third world war, there is also some truth.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich April 22 2018 06: 21
      +8
      What to do in current conditions?
      Option 1
      1. Chertt
        Chertt April 22 2018 07: 38
        +4
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Option 1

        This option gives a freeze situation, not our victory. After a while, the same situation will appear in a new round
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana April 22 2018 09: 58
          +26
          I already wrote about where the sovereignty of the country - the Russian Federation begins. By the way, the article says nothing about this. Namely, the sovereignty of the Russian Federation has lost: 1) with the adoption of the colonial Yeltsin Constitution of the Russian Federation and 2) with the adoption of the Federal Law "On the Central Bank", independent of the government of the Russian Federation.
          All the negative and predatory West processes in the Russian Federation began precisely with these legislative provisions in the colonial countries, including the Russian Federation. How many Russians did not strengthen the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, these laws offset this strengthening by the fall in the financial and economic situation of Russia.
          It is a pity that the author did not say a word about this! Namely.

          The fact is that the highest authority in the country, according to Russian law, is in fact with the leaders of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. You can call it "dual power." Namely.

          After ratification of the Bialowieza Accords, Russia turned into a colony of a unipolar world led by Washington. One of the most important instruments for managing Russia as a colony was the new credit and financial system (CFS) of Russia.
          On 20 of December 1991, the State Bank of the USSR was abolished. All assets, liabilities and property of the USSR State Bank on the territory of the RSFSR were transferred to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. A few months later, the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia) was renamed the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia).
          The very first version of the law "On the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia)" was adopted on December 2 of 1990 of the year, after Yeltsin B.N. by a huge margin, he won the election and became the first president of Russia, and after six months of his presidency he signed Federal Law No. 1990-02.12.1990 of 394. The law was modified and supplemented, but in general its essence was preserved.
          The betrayal of the national sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the field of finance was laid down and reinforced in its very Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12 1993, which was compiled under the EBN under the patronage of Washington.
          Officially, the authors of this colonial Constitution of the Russian Federation from the 1993 of the year were: Sergei Shakhrai, Anatoly Sobchak, Sergey Sergeyevich Alekseev and the Constitutional Meeting of the Russian Federation.
          The Constitution of the Russian Federation from 1993 of the year only consolidated the colonial position of the Russian Federation in this matter.
          1. Chertt
            Chertt April 22 2018 10: 07
            +5
            You must certainly write a detailed article about this hi
            I only note that in Russian mass media all talk about changing the constitution is surprisingly cautious. What speaks of understanding the importance of the question (Perhaps you are right, the most important question)
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana April 22 2018 10: 20
              +19
              When we say that there is a "dual power" in the Russian Federation, which drowns our country - Russia and is sure to drown it in favor of the Washington Regional Committee, we have in mind the following: that the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation not only consolidated the colonial position of the Russian Federation on this issue , but the Federal Law "On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation" also works for this. Namely.

              When, for example, they are now talking about the criminal activity of the Central Bank of Russia with regard to the same financing of the military-industrial complex and with respect to its national sovereignty, as well as about the liberoid Kudrin’s commitment to the IMF economic option of "development", all this follows from Russian legislation. It is in this pro-American, pro-Western Yeltsin legislation that everything is fixed. First of all, it follows from the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 15, paragraph 4. Etc.
              Constitution of the Russian Federation Article 15:
              4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply.
              Those. if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “beyond the hill” and begins to complain to the international court there. And the international court of law takes precedence over our Russian one.
              Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation 7:
              The Bank of Russia, on matters within its competence by this Federal Law and other federal laws, issues normative acts binding on federal bodies of state power, bodies of state power of subjects of the Russian Federation and local authorities, all legal entities and individuals in the form of instructions, provisions and instructions .
              The rules for preparing regulations of the Bank of Russia are established by the Bank of Russia independently.
              If the Central Bank decides to collect all metal money from all over the country, it can issue such a decree and everyone will be required to comply with it.
              Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation 21:
              The Bank of Russia and the Government of the Russian Federation inform each other about proposed actions of national importance, coordinate their policies, and hold regular mutual consultations.
              Reminds an agreement between two countries.
              The Bank of Russia advises the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation on a schedule for the issue of government securities of the Russian Federation and repayment of the state debt of the Russian Federation, taking into account their impact on the state of the banking system of the Russian Federation and the priorities of a unified monetary policy.
              As we see, the Central Bank does not belong to the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, and he only advises him.
              Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation 22:
              The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to the Government of the Russian Federation to finance the deficit of the federal budget, the Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to finance the deficits of budgets of state extra-budgetary funds, budgets of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local budgets.
              If the state does not have enough money, it cannot take it from the Central Bank. The state may go bankrupt when the basements of the Central Bank are clogged with gold and currency.
              But the law does not say that the Central Bank cannot lend to other states.
              Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation 23:
              Federal budget funds and funds of state extra-budgetary funds are stored in the Bank of Russia, unless otherwise provided by federal laws.
              The Central Bank is independent, not liable for obligations, but all state money goes to it.
              The powers of the Bank of Russia to service the state debt of the Russian Federation are determined by federal laws. The Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, if necessary, conclude agreements on conducting the above operations on behalf of the Government of the Russian Federation.
              If the Government of the Russian Federation wants to do something in the financial sector, but it itself cannot. Because the money is all in the Central Bank, and he disposes of it. The government asks the Ministry of Finance to conclude an agreement with the Central Bank and only when they agree do they begin to work together. And if you don’t agree?
              1. Chertt
                Chertt April 22 2018 10: 34
                +6
                Quote: Tatiana
                When, for example, they are now talking about the criminal activity of the Central Bank of Russia with regard to the same financing of the military-industrial complex and with respect to its national sovereignty, as well as about the liberoid Kudrin’s commitment to the IMF economic option of "development", all this follows from Russian legislation. It is in this pro-American, pro-Western Yeltsin legislation that everything is fixed. First of all, it follows from the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 15, paragraph 4. Etc.

                Those. the President, under the current constitution, has no leverage to combat the anti-state activities of his own Central Bank. The conclusion is unambiguous, a change in the Constitution, possibly through a referendum, It seems to me that people are ready for this. And on separate articles (ideology) already requires
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana April 22 2018 11: 07
                  +10
                  Chertt (Alexey)
                  Those. the President, under the current constitution, has no leverage to combat the anti-state activities of his own Central Bank.
                  Well no! A referendum is needed to amend the Constitution of the Russian Federation, but with the announcement of such a referendum, the legislation also contains such problems for the will of the people that the referendum on this issue never takes place.

                  If you noticed, then first, from under a national sovereign state, its financial base for its sovereign economic development is knocked out from under its feet. Finance is the living blood of economic development in terms of organizing any domestic production in the country. Financial capital is in the hands of usurers of the privately owned Fed of the United States, whose structure is the IMF is enriched not on real production of material goods, but on usurious%. And Russia became their hostage in accordance with the legislative colonial content of the Federal Law "On the Central Bank of Russia". And then this is indirectly included in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
                  And all the same thing happened with all the countries of the post-Soviet space. This is not accidental, but a systematically worked out by Western financiers around the world, the secret move of the Washington Regional Committee financiers-globalizers to neocolonize and subjugate previously sovereign countries around the world.
                2. falcon
                  falcon April 22 2018 14: 23
                  +4
                  Quote: Chertt

                  Those. the President, under the current constitution, has no leverage to combat the anti-state activities of his own Central

                  Do not tell people!)) The candidacy for the post of Chairman of the Central Bank
                  represents the President. Appointed by the State Duma for a term of 4 years by a majority vote. That is, do you think that the President submitted the candidacy of a not devoted person to the post of the head of the CBR?))
                  1. zoolu350
                    zoolu350 April 23 2018 05: 36
                    +4
                    The president makes a candidacy devoted to the oligarchy of the Russian Federation, but who said that this candidacy cannot be devoted to the owners of the Fed?
                3. Golovan Jack
                  Golovan Jack April 22 2018 14: 34
                  +2
                  Quote: Chertt
                  Those. the President, under the current constitution, has no leverage to combat the anti-state activities of his own Central Bank

                  Rave. Repeatedly refuted. But you, apparently, not for the future.
                  Once again, in a boring voice: National Banking Council. Read, enlighten. Then, so be it, start changing the Constitution.
                  1. Tatanka Yotanka
                    Tatanka Yotanka April 22 2018 19: 06
                    +5
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    Rave. Repeatedly disproved

                    I’m sometimes forced to agree with you)), but then who should blame this anti-state activity of the Central Bank for the president?
                    1. Golovan Jack
                      Golovan Jack April 22 2018 19: 08
                      +3
                      Quote: Tatanka Yotanka
                      then who should blame this anti-state activity of the Central Bank

                      But what, it is proved that the Central Bank is engaged in just such an activity? Someone besides the local "onolitegs"? Well, and maybe - Kotonosov?
                      PS: Glazyev - not to offer, he is included in this very Council wink
                      PPS: I mean, first you need to prove the composition ... and then you can already think what and on whom, um, to blame laughing
                      1. Tatanka Yotanka
                        Tatanka Yotanka April 22 2018 19: 11
                        +2
                        Quote: Golovan Jack
                        Well, and maybe - Kotonosov?

                        I offer Fedorov and his GCD in the mine; they all shout more about it
                      2. New Year day
                        New Year day April 22 2018 19: 57
                        +2
                        Quote: Golovan Jack
                        proved that the Central Bank is engaged in just such an activity? Someone besides the local "onolitegs"?

                        and I agree with Jack. We evaluate any acts on the basis of our own experience and rely on our knowledge, which is usually not enough in this area, but we see how we want it. But this is not enough.
                        We know that we don’t know anything. am
                  2. Maki Avellevich
                    Maki Avellevich April 24 2018 21: 35
                    +1
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    Rave. Repeatedly refuted. But you, apparently, not for the future.
                    Once again, in a boring voice: National Banking Council. Read, enlighten. Then, so be it, start changing the Constitution.


                    About the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)
                    Article 14.
                    The Chairman of the Bank of Russia may be dismissed only in the following cases:

                    expiration of the term of office;

                    the impossibility of performing official duties, confirmed by the conclusion of the state medical commission;

                    submitting a personal resignation letter;

                    the commission of a criminal offense established by a court verdict that has entered into legal force;

                    violations of federal laws that govern issues related to the activities of the Bank of Russia;

                    it is strange that if the president of Russia is dissatisfied with the results of the work of the Bank of Russia, then changing it is not his authority. may submit to the position and dismiss not.
                    if the chairman of the Bank of Russia falls ill, or has arranged a crime, then it can be kicked out, and if he is not competent, then the deadline will still serve.
                    1. Golovan Jack
                      Golovan Jack April 24 2018 21: 52
                      +1
                      Quote: Maki Avellievich
                      if not competent, then the term still lasts

                      Until your voluntary resignation ... or sudden death ... do not tell, in short.
                      And it was not about that: the Chairman of the Central Bank is not alone in managing this Central Bank.
                      Further - see above, and do not forget to turn on your head yes
                      1. Mordvin 3
                        Mordvin 3 April 24 2018 22: 08
                        0
                        Quote: Golovan Jack
                        The Chairman of the Central Bank does not alone manage this Central Bank.

                        Are you talking about Naibullina or something?
                4. Alf
                  Alf April 22 2018 20: 11
                  +1
                  Quote: Chertt
                  amending the Constitution, possibly through a referendum, It seems to me that people are ready for this.

                  Is the president ready for this? Simply put, does he need it?
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. The comment was deleted.
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana April 22 2018 11: 26
              +5
              luk (Anatoly)
              Dear Tatyana, in one article it is impossible to cover everything. As for the Central Bank and banks in general, you can read my article: https://topwar.ru/138304-raznos-vtoroy-krovososy.
              html / Bloodsuckers - about banks /

              Thank you Anatoly! I will read it for sure!

              And so, if you are the author of this article, I will tell you sincerely: I liked your article in everything else, except for my remark!
              I fully share everything that you have outlined.
              Only now, I still believe that the emphasis with proposals for Russia to overcome the crisis in its struggle to preserve its sovereignty should be - even in such an article - shifted to the need to change the existing legislative framework of Russia. And then we say little to Russian citizens about this: that the country's finances should work on behalf of Russia, and not support its Western enemy strength, otherwise Russia and the peoples of Russia will necessarily lose the war with the West. With this, you can no longer be put off.
              And so it turns out that if you hold a referendum on this issue in the Russian Federation, then the people are not ready to understand the main essence of this problem.

              And so, of course, thank you for the article! There are not so many good articles on the Internet. You +
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana April 22 2018 11: 58
                  +5
                  Quote: luk
                  I also understand that absolutely everything needs to be changed. But the old team is not able to do this. Even in theory, since the creation of a new system requires new creators - competent, decent and non-possessors. AUTHOR
                  But when we raise such important social questions about the survival of the country and Russian society, the state that forms the Russian people, we cannot leave the dialectical materialistic principle - the principle of determinism, i.e. metaphysically violate and not consider the nature of the connections of phenomena in time.
                  In this case, all causal relationships of phenomena are violated. The people in power structures shoot sparrows! Questions are raised about the personalities of the authorities, but not about the scientific bankruptcy of the country's ideology itself and, on its basis, the colonial legislation itself.
                  And how then can the people restore the sovereignty of the country and survive, if in the educated worldview by scientists and the media for the people this methodological circumstance is overlooked - and the reason for its death is not understood by the people? It is not clear exactly what exactly and where the “dog” is buried.
                2. Golovan Jack
                  Golovan Jack April 22 2018 12: 02
                  0
                  Quote: luk
                  ... competent ...

                  But for some reason everything does not give me rest "anaconda spitting with poison" ...
                  This is the question of competence, if that.
                  And about the ability to determine the competence of someone else ... using this very anaconda, obviously recourse
          4. falcon
            falcon April 22 2018 14: 08
            +2
            Quote: Tatiana
            Namely, the sovereignty of the Russian Federation has lost: 1) with the adoption of the colonial Yeltsin Constitution of the Russian Federation and 2) with the adoption of the Federal Law "On the Central Bank", independent of the government of the Russian Federation.

            With all due respect, your understanding of these issues gives a little
            amateurism. In any normal country (excluding Zimbabwe), between
            The government and the Central Bank should be a conflict of interest. Government Objective
            (if primitive) - this is to spend (on social programs, defense, etc.). You can spend
            only what is included in the Budget (approved, by the way, by the Federal Assembly), and money, as always, is not enough (remember, as an example, the May decrees
            President and their implementation). What is the easiest way (from the point of view of the Government)? Correctly printing machine! The task of the Central Bank is not
            to admit. We need to live within our means. I personally would not want to live to see the Central Bank subordinate to the Government!)) By the way, in 2016. Central Bank
            transferred 90% of its income to the federal budget. Another thing is that
            the competence of those persons whom the President recommended (appointed) to lead
            The Central Bank is in doubt.)) But, this is no longer a question of legislation.
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana April 22 2018 14: 55
              +7
              Quote: falcon
              In any normal country (excluding Zimbabwe), there should be a conflict of interest between the Government and the Central Bank.

              A conflict of interest is when a country does not have its own national Central Bank of the country, because the Central Bank of Russia is not one, which, by the way, is planned to be finally privatized by Russian bankers from the Russian Federation; and the Russian ruble is not the property of the country, but the property of this certain private proprietary Central Bank of Russia and is tied to the American dollar as a foreign private currency of the US Federal Reserve so that it is essentially the same American dollar, but in the "native" version!
              Quote: falcon
              You can spend only what is laid down in the Budget (approved, by the way, by the Federal Assembly), and money, as always, is not enough
              At first. And the state will not have enough money - with such a system of issue of rubles in Russia, when the Central Bank in the country is focused exclusively on financial profit on a private basis. In addition, the Central Bank of Russia, which is administratively separated from the state, cannot issue Russian rubles in isolation from the purchase of the American dollar. And who rules Russia?
              And secondly, The "printing press" of the US Federal Reserve dollars works without any restrictions!
              Thirdly. But do not tell me why in the USSR, under the socialist system, there was no conflict of interests between the truly national Central Bank and the government, as is the case now?
              1. falcon
                falcon April 22 2018 16: 13
                +3
                Quote: Tatiana
                Quote: falcon
                In any normal country (excluding Zimbabwe), there should be a conflict of interest between the Government and the Central Bank.

                A conflict of interest is when a country does not have its own national central bank, for the Central Bank of Russia is not one;

                A conflict of interest is possible only between two (or more) subjects of legal relations. Here in Zimbabwe it is not. Because there is no independent Central Bank as such. You have a gap in the logical chain.
                Quote: Tatiana
                In addition, the Central Bank of Russia, which is administratively separated from the state, cannot issue Russian rubles in isolation from the purchase of the American dollar.

                Where did you get that the Central Bank is separated from the state? All assets !!! and the property of the Central Bank is federal property, its Chairman is proposed by the President and approved by the State Duma, etc. etc.
                Tell me a document where it is determined that the Central Bank can not issue, in isolation from the purchase of dollars ??? Emissions in any country should correlate with the volume of goods and services produced in the country. This is the first course of any economic university! Otherwise - inflation)))
                Quote: Tatiana
                But do not tell me why in the USSR, under the socialist system, there was no conflict of interests between the truly national Central Bank and the government, as is the case now?

                And who told you that was not? It was precisely for this reason that they approached the issue very carefully. There was a “drunk budget” and a government bond issue. That is, the Government was looking for other ways to replenish the budget than simply issuing money, because the State Bank did not go for it. And he did it right.
                State-building is a complex science, it must be studied in a comprehensive manner, and not be operated on in discussions with cheer-patriotic slogans that are not backed up by knowledge in the financial and legal fields.
                Sincerely.
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana April 22 2018 16: 38
                  +2
                  Quote: falcon
                  State-building is a complex science, it must be studied in a comprehensive manner, and not be operated on in discussions by cheers-patriotic slogans
                  That's it, that complex! And where are you this COMPLEX of state building? Something I don’t see him, except for the Kudrinsky direction of further privatization of Russian state property and the maximum departure of the state from the so-called "free" market of capital, goods and labor. What complex construction of the state of Russia in this case can liberals talk about ?!
                  And on the nose TMV! Do you think we will win it if there is a private owner registered in offshore and abroad for each strategic sector of n / a in Russia?
                  In my opinion, you also do not quite understand everything.
                  1. falcon
                    falcon April 22 2018 20: 56
                    +1
                    Well! As you discuss with a cheer patriot, so instead of facts, cliches and cliches are used!))
                    Quote: Tatiana

                    And on the nose TMV! Do you think we will win it if

                    I am sure you have no facts about the imminent start of TMV! Not a single party is interested in unleashing it.
                    1. Tatyana
                      Tatyana April 22 2018 23: 14
                      +1
                      Quote: falcon
                      I am sure you have no facts about the imminent start of TMV! Not a single party is interested in unleashing it.
                      Well, this is already an excess!
                      Blessed is he who does not know about it and is not able to make forecasts! Your enemies in Russia are simply “white” and “fluffy” and do not crawl into the armed conflict with Russia! And NATO, led by the Pentagon, is just an angel of peace and tranquility!
                    2. zoolu350
                      zoolu350 April 23 2018 05: 41
                      +2
                      TMV ALREADY goes if you have not noticed. And while the largest fragment of Russia is defeated in it.
          5. Varyag77
            Varyag77 April 22 2018 17: 57
            +2
            Quote: Tatiana
            I already wrote about where the sovereignty of the country - the Russian Federation begins. By the way, the article says nothing about this. Namely, the sovereignty of the Russian Federation has lost: 1) with the adoption of the colonial Yeltsin Constitution of the Russian Federation and 2) with the adoption of the Federal Law "On the Central Bank", independent of the government of the Russian Federation.
            All the negative and predatory West processes in the Russian Federation began precisely with these legislative provisions in the colonial countries, including the Russian Federation. How many Russians did not strengthen the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, these laws offset this strengthening by the fall in the financial and economic situation of Russia.
            It is a pity that the author did not say a word about this! Namely.

            The fact is that the highest authority in the country, according to Russian law, is in fact with the leaders of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. You can call it "dual power." Namely.

            After ratification of the Bialowieza Accords, Russia turned into a colony of a unipolar world led by Washington. One of the most important instruments for managing Russia as a colony was the new credit and financial system (CFS) of Russia.
            On 20 of December 1991, the State Bank of the USSR was abolished. All assets, liabilities and property of the USSR State Bank on the territory of the RSFSR were transferred to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. A few months later, the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia) was renamed the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia).
            The very first version of the law "On the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia)" was adopted on December 2 of 1990 of the year, after Yeltsin B.N. by a huge margin, he won the election and became the first president of Russia, and after six months of his presidency he signed Federal Law No. 1990-02.12.1990 of 394. The law was modified and supplemented, but in general its essence was preserved.
            The betrayal of the national sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the field of finance was laid down and reinforced in its very Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12 1993, which was compiled under the EBN under the patronage of Washington.
            Officially, the authors of this colonial Constitution of the Russian Federation from the 1993 of the year were: Sergei Shakhrai, Anatoly Sobchak, Sergey Sergeyevich Alekseev and the Constitutional Meeting of the Russian Federation.
            The Constitution of the Russian Federation from 1993 of the year only consolidated the colonial position of the Russian Federation in this matter.

            It will be a shock to you to find out that the State Bank of the USSR did not submit to the government of the USSR either? So maybe you need to understand why the country's central bank should NOT obey the government? Or do not give a damn that there is not enough knowledge and understanding of the issue, the main thing is to crow, but at least do not bloom there?
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana April 22 2018 19: 55
              +2
              Quote: Varyag77
              Or do not give a damn that there is not enough knowledge and understanding of the issue, the main thing is to crow, but at least do not bloom there?

              You, liberal economist-financiers, first understand among yourself where the financial oligarchy comes from and how it comes from!
              falcon (Alexander)
              Where did you get that the Central Bank is separated from the state? All assets !!! and the property of the Central Bank is federal property, its Chairman is proposed by the President and approved by the State Duma, etc. etc.

              Yes, as it was originally in the US Federal Reserve. Why did you kill John F. Kennedy?
              To help you, liberal economists and financiers, a book of Western authors, if Katasonov, for example, you do not like:
              1.Simon Jlnson, James Quark. 13 banks that rule the world: Captured by Wall Street and waiting for the next financial collapse // Foreword by Viktor Vladimirovich Gerashchenko / Trans. from English V. Egorova. - Because of Career Press, 2013 - 368 p.
              1. Varyag77
                Varyag77 April 22 2018 21: 53
                +2
                Quote: Tatiana
                You, liberal economist-financiers, first understand among yourself where the financial oligarchy comes from and how it comes from!

                I got it. Somewhere you read something and you are not alone, but your knowledge is far from both the financial and the banking system. Hence the complete misunderstanding of the issue. And aggression with accusations.
                I will tell you frankly that you are incompetent in matters of the central bank, like most "egregious" ones about addiction. That is, you do not understand the essence of the Central Bank. What is it for and what mechanisms should be used. I can only wish you to study this issue, at least on your knee.

                You can ask me. I will explain to you. Very simple and easy to understand. wink
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana April 22 2018 23: 07
                  +1
                  Quote: Varyag77
                  You can ask me. I will explain to you. Very simple and easy to understand.
                  Explain! And I will compare your explanation-understanding with the books of foreign authors and the same Katasonov whom you do not like so much and consider him, apparently, also an amateur in the economy.
                  I will also try to find what you are hung up on - where we have a torn link. At the same time, I will look again at the Federal Law "On the Central Bank of Russia", there is one fundamental article there that I need to refresh in my memory. And so I just got home. Time is the 12th hour of the night. So I’ll have all the views tomorrow.
                  And now I will honestly say that I do not see any discrepancies between Katasonov and foreign authors.
                  1. Varyag77
                    Varyag77 April 22 2018 23: 59
                    +2
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    Quote: Varyag77
                    You can ask me. I will explain to you. Very simple and easy to understand.
                    Explain! And I will compare your explanation-understanding with the books of foreign authors and the same Katasonov whom you do not like so much and consider him, apparently, also an amateur in the economy.
                    I will also try to find what you are hung up on - where we have a torn link. At the same time, I will look again at the Federal Law "On the Central Bank of Russia", there is one fundamental article there that I need to refresh in my memory. And so I just got home. Time is the 12th hour of the night. So I’ll have all the views tomorrow.
                    And now I will honestly say that I do not see any discrepancies between Katasonov and foreign authors.

                    Well look.
                    I do not know who was the first to raise the wave about the Central Bank, but these people are far from understanding the mechanism. We heard a jingle, but don’t know where it is.
                    The main tasks of the Central Bank are to maintain the exchange rate of the national currency and ensure cash circulation in the country, i.e. emissions (issue and withdrawal of money from circulation). Yes. the Central Bank still has functions, but these are the main ones.
                    The Central Bank has the exclusive right to issue money into circulation (as well as its production). That is, the printing press belongs to the Central Bank.
                    Now remember the saying about the girl. The proverb is rude of course, but what is. whoever dines for a girl dances her. Having subordinated the Central Bank to the government, the government transfers the right to dispose of this machine. So absolutely any deficit can be covered by simply turning on the machine. Any problems with the budget can be solved by printing an additional mass of money. But any freshman at an economic university knows that an uncontrolled increase in money will inevitably lead to inflation. Money supply should always be provided with goods. So here. In order to prevent uncontrolled use of the machine, the right to use it was removed from the Ministry of Finance. The Central Bank itself, regardless of what it wants (or does not want), the Ministry of Finance makes a decision on its inclusion. And it is based solely on its data, which are collected throughout the country (banks) daily, monthly .. well, etc. All banks provide reporting to the Central Bank.
                    Further. as for the release of money into circulation in general. The same Fedorov carries such a game that his ears fade. I shout to you professionally. The release of money into circulation depends solely on the needs of the client and nothing more.
                    I will explain this moment. in each institution of the Central Bank there is a so-called "Storage" in which there is a stock of money. Decent such stock. So here. This money in storage is not quite money. This is to say "pieces of paper very similar to money." They become full-fledged money only when they were withdrawn by their Warehouses for extradition. And this was taken away. It doesn’t come from the Central Bank from above, but from the bottom. In each branch of the Central Bank, based on customer requests, money is issued. Clearly outlined? No dollar exchange rate, no damn US government bonds and other crap, nothing to do with it. Only the application of the organization, which stands on the service. All. And now you need to understand the difference. Between "as if money in the Warehouse" and real money. That is, they printed 1 billion rubles in Moscow. And they brought him to Uryupinsk. Put in storage. This Billion is not money yet. This paper is simple. They will become money after their release into circulation. And believe me, in Uryupinsk they will be released regardless of anything. The process of issuing (or withdrawing) money from circulation is in no way connected either with the world economy or with the Fed conspiracies .. in general with nothing.
                    Therefore, the Bank of Russia is responsible for the cash execution of the federal budget.
                    And now the funniest thing. All these attacks on the Central Bank pursue one goal. And believe me, it’s not at all for YOUR good. The Central Bank, on the contrary, has been rotten; First, the Ministry of Finance (which sleeps and sees) the Central Bank in its subordination, took and created its own system of federal treasury, which essentially has the functions of the Central Bank. Then, transferring the servicing of budgets of all levels to these federal treasuries, the Ministry of Finance forced the treasuries to go to commercial banks. This is mainly Sberbank and VTB. In fact, the Ministry of Finance (and he achieves this) transferred the federal budget to business. Do you understand how much the commercial banks are welding on the means of the federal budget? After the departure of Gerashchenko, the Central Bank only did that they scored in a corner. The Ministry of Finance, coupled with business, are doing such a fraudulent scam. And you say the Central Bank.
                    You have already been told above that the Central Bank is relatively arbitrary independent. The fact that the Central Bank does not meet the debt of the state, like the state for the debts of the Central Bank, does not mean anything. Look at the regulations on the State Bank of the USSR. There is the same wording. This is a purely technical moment that would not be able to seize assets abroad. The Central Bank is subject to verification by the Accounts Chamber. The Chairperson is appointed by the President. The meaning of the "independence" of the Central Bank is its independence from the Government, and specifically the Ministry of Finance. That they would not be able to create chaos with the money supply at will. All.
                    The fact that dollars are bought, it must be understood that the dollar is an internationally approved reserve currency. What is wrong here? For better or worse, the question is different. But that’s why the dollar is being bought. It would be gold, the currency it would be bought. It is already bought of course, but not as a currency. And the purchase is made for the possibility of repulsing speculative attacks on the national currency (and the Central Bank does this by throwing dollars from its reserves onto the market), as well as in the case of some kind of economic arctic fox which will be decided at the international level to switch to using everywhere dollar.
                    YES, of course, the Fed has driven the world, but the whole world, and not just the Russian Central Bank. The Central Bank plays by these rules and nothing more. So there is nothing to analyze (by the way, almost all the Central Bank’s profits are given to the state).
                    And in fact, the Central Bank is a federal executive body, which is confirmed by the position of the courts. So there is nothing wrong with the fact that all issues related to cash circulation in the country are decided by the Central Bank and its decisions and instructions are required to fulfill absolutely everything on the territory of the Russian Federation. He was created for this.
                    And yes. decides to withdraw the coins. Isizmet. believe him (CB) is more visible than you.
                    The cost of a coin worth 1 kopeck. = 10 kopecks (as far as I remember) this is so for you. by the way.
                    So for all the seemingly "Central Bank actions in the Western interests" there, believe me, it only seems. Everyone just does his own thing. The Ministry of Finance, its Central Bank. They have different affairs, therefore, one should not obey the other.
                    1. dSK
                      dSK April 23 2018 00: 26
                      +2
                      Quote: Varyag77
                      They have different affairs, therefore, one should not obey the other.
                      yes, yes ... "Swan, Cancer and Pike." State bank - because "state". Would you fly to the "states", a finance specialist, but you don’t need you there ...
                      1. Varyag77
                        Varyag77 April 23 2018 08: 34
                        +1
                        Quote: dsk
                        Quote: Varyag77
                        They have different affairs, therefore, one should not obey the other.
                        yes, yes ... "Swan, Cancer and Pike." State bank - because "state". Would you fly to the "states", a finance specialist, but you don’t need you there ...

                        I am for those who repeat in an armored train. In Soviet times, the situation was exactly the same. and the Ministry of Finance has been trying to crush the State Bank for itself since the 50s. This is for you "special" for thought. Not understanding (not knowing) does not lead to anything good. And before yelling about something, you need to study the issue. At least not stupid people do this.
                  2. dSK
                    dSK April 23 2018 00: 32
                    +1
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    I do not see any discrepancies between Katasonov and foreign authors.

                    Thanks Tatyana Fedorovna for the competent comments. hi
                2. Tatyana
                  Tatyana April 23 2018 00: 10
                  0
                  Quote: Varyag77
                  You can ask me. I will explain to you. Very simple and easy to understand.

                  In the meantime, comment on the article "Secrets of the Central Bank. The owner of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is unknown, but his power is unlimited" - http://maxpark.com/community/129/content/6153164
                  What, in your opinion, as a specialist in the article is not like you, objecting to me, say this?
                  For others, I also recommend reading this article and watching a video for it to answer many questions.

                  Central bank. Here KOM belongs to the Central Bank of Russia. Published: Published: May 28, 2017
                  1. Varyag77
                    Varyag77 April 23 2018 00: 31
                    +1
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    Quote: Varyag77
                    You can ask me. I will explain to you. Very simple and easy to understand.

                    In the meantime, comment on the article "Secrets of the Central Bank. The owner of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is unknown, but his power is unlimited" - http://maxpark.com/community/129/content/6153164
                    What, in your opinion, as a specialist in the article is not like you, objecting to me, say this?
                    For others, I also recommend reading this article and watching a video for it to answer many questions.

                    Central bank. Here KOM belongs to the Central Bank of Russia. Published: Published: May 28, 2017

                    Tatyana, can I comment on the delirium of the yellow press? Well, there’s just such an owl on a globe pulled that e mine.
                    The man claims that the Central Bank belongs to the Fed. Where is the evidence? Did he think so? As for the adoption of the ruble in the entire territory of the Russian Federation. Well take a chance and not accept. Believe that organization the sky will seem a pretty penny. This is all spelled out in the normative. Coat of arms. So, the fact that the emblem of the Moscow Region does not correspond to the emblem of the Russian Federation does not bother you, but does the Central Bank bother you? Well, nonsense further in the same vein.
                    And what is the dollar secured with? When was gold. De Gaulle discouraged them from indulging. So not a single currency in the world is essentially backed up by anything. Do not worry. The world has changed. No more.
                    1. Tatyana
                      Tatyana April 23 2018 01: 42
                      0
                      Quote: Varyag77
                      Coat of arms. So, the fact that the emblem of the Moscow Region does not correspond to the emblem of the Russian Federation does not bother you, but does the Central Bank bother you?

                      I did not pay attention to the coat of arms of the Moscow Region, but if this is so, then this is also wrong. Moreover, this can be done manipulatively in order to "blur" the attention of Russians to the banknotes belonging to the "Central Bank of Russia", and not to the state of the Russian Federation, as such.
                      At the same time, in vain do you call this article a "yellow press" if it is not published in a scientific publication. The questions in it are not raised "yellow" at all. This is not culinary gossip about bed adventures of our media people.
                      I cannot cite the important sections of this article here. So it’s better to read it all the same, please, and answer the question at least in appearance of the Central Bank of Russia notes. Why do you think there are no important elements? In what way do you think the author is wrong when he compares them with Soviet banknotes and sees serious - PINCIPAL - differences even with US Fed dollars?
                      And so I am not satisfied with your answer. Brushing aside the answer to the question by dumping everything on the "yellow press" is the easiest way. For example, maxpark.com site does not belong to the "yellow press" at all.
                      1. dSK
                        dSK April 23 2018 07: 39
                        +1
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        the site maxpark.com is not a “yellow press” at all.

                        « Give me the right to issue and control the country's money–and I will it makes no difference who makes the laws! "- this phrase was pronounced Mayer Amschel Rothschild. The plan of world domination was created back in 1773 in the Rothschild shop, where he gathered 13 German bankers and invited them to participate in it. The ultimate goal of this plan was complete control over: money, military. education, media. the church. "
                        Everything according to the "cunning plan" is stubbornly carried out.
                      2. Varyag77
                        Varyag77 April 23 2018 08: 41
                        0
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Quote: Varyag77
                        Coat of arms. So, the fact that the emblem of the Moscow Region does not correspond to the emblem of the Russian Federation does not bother you, but does the Central Bank bother you?

                        I did not pay attention to the coat of arms of the Moscow Region, but if this is so, then this is also wrong. Moreover, this can be done manipulatively in order to "blur" the attention of Russians to the banknotes belonging to the "Central Bank of Russia", and not to the state of the Russian Federation, as such.
                        At the same time, in vain do you call this article a "yellow press" if it is not published in a scientific publication. The questions in it are not raised "yellow" at all. This is not culinary gossip about bed adventures of our media people.
                        I cannot cite the important sections of this article here. So it’s better to read it all the same, please, and answer the question at least in appearance of the Central Bank of Russia notes. Why do you think there are no important elements? In what way do you think the author is wrong when he compares them with Soviet banknotes and sees serious - PINCIPAL - differences even with US Fed dollars?
                        And so I am not satisfied with your answer. Brushing aside the answer to the question by dumping everything on the "yellow press" is the easiest way. For example, maxpark.com site does not belong to the "yellow press" at all.

                        Tatyana, how seriously do you take the article that says this? According to the author, the word is not, the emblem is not the same, and in general the USSR is not written anywhere.
                        It seems to me that with such serious charges, the evidence should be more serious.
                        The world has changed. The country has changed. For the same emblems, have you not noticed that all ministries and departments have their own emblem on the basis of a two-headed eagle? Well, such a fashion. So now what?
                        What else to explain then? Was the man scared that the Ruble was not provided with anything? And how amateur is he? If you do not know that paper money has always been provided by only one. GOLD. But when the world moved away from the gold exchange standard (which is wrong in my opinion), then absolutely any money became secured on the principle of "I swear by Mom."
                        So the article is so amateurish and superficial. All "as if arguments" from ignorance of the question from the word AT ALL.
                    2. Tatyana
                      Tatyana April 23 2018 16: 34
                      0
                      Varyag77 (Andrey)
                      The world has changed. The country has changed. For the same emblems, have you not noticed that all ministries and departments have their own emblem on the basis of a two-headed eagle? Well, such a fashion. So now what?
                      Andrew! Every MOD has its own political and economic background - the reason and strategic goal.
                      About the reason. For example, FASHION for short skirts after the war has always been determined by the high cost of the fabric and the material situation of the “fashionista” in the country. A snapshot of the 20s in the countries of Europe and the USA.

                      Remember the female fashion - namely the MODU - at least during the NEP. The length of the skirts of fashionistas is no longer even midi, but to the middle of the knee!
                      The 1965 movie "Viper" - https://www.youtube.com/watch? See from the beginning of the film, see from 11.11: 00
                      It is noteworthy that in the 30s - on the eve of WWII - high militaristic shoulders in both men and women came into fashion in Europe. And in the German military uniform of a cap with its front part tucked up, visually increasing the growth of its wearer. All this is a non-verbal demonstration of the militaristic superiority of one’s country over other countries and peoples. Etc.
                      So for each MODE in relation to any things and phenomena has its own socio-political marketing reasons.
                      Such "FASHIONS", as you say, are not easy! Look for the reason - and you will find it! This is the first.
                      Second.
                      Quote: Varyag77
                      And what is the dollar secured with? When was gold. De Gaulle discouraged them from indulging. So no currency in the world is essentially backed up by anything. Do not worry. The world has changed. No more.
                      And the dollar is ensured by the fact that all banks in the world are obliged to buy up dollar currency for their national currency, which corresponds to the accumulated produced wealth of their country. The US Federal Reserve sets its usurious%.
                  2. Tatyana
                    Tatyana April 23 2018 00: 32
                    +1
                    Quote: Varyag77
                    You can ask me. I will explain to you. Very simple and easy to understand.

                    Comment on this video more
                    Central bank. Here KOM belongs to the Central Bank of Russia. Published: Published: May 28, 2017
                    1. dSK
                      dSK April 23 2018 01: 43
                      +1
                      Thanks again for the video. hi
                    2. Varyag77
                      Varyag77 April 23 2018 09: 48
                      0
                      Quote: Tatiana
                      Quote: Varyag77
                      You can ask me. I will explain to you. Very simple and easy to understand.

                      Comment on this video more
                      Central bank. Here KOM belongs to the Central Bank of Russia. Published: Published: May 28, 2017

                      1. With regard to rewriting, the Bank is not liable for obligations of the state, and the state for obligations of the bank. I already answered. This is an absolutely technical moment, which protects the assets of the Central Bank located abroad from seizure and confiscation in the event of sanctions being imposed on the state. For example, like now. And about the Miracle. The same wording was about the USSR State Bank.
                      2.Account of ships. a person altogether misinterprets the essence (intentionally or out of knowledge is not important). We are talking about the courts of the Russian Federation in domestic activities. For example, I won a court with a pension fund. Imagine even government agencies can sue each other. There is nothing "conspiratorial" in this. And also about international courts, to protect the interests of the Bank of Russia abroad. This is normal normal practice. What is wrong?
                      3. As for the transportation of money (dollars are not dollars is not important). And the safes of the Central Bank are not designed for such an amount. I can only laugh in my voice. Man has never seen, then no. I think so if a person is brought into the Warehouse of at least the regional Central Bank (I'm not talking about Interregional vaults), he will have a heart attack with a stroke at the same time. about the fact that not everything is lucky in Russia. So why, if the part is immediately placed for "work"?
                      4. about the gold-foreign exchange reserve. Must be divided. gold is gold. And it is not provided at all. but by yourself. Gold is therefore interesting because it is material. And its size is estimated in tons, but in zeroes and ones in a computer. As for the currency, yes. We buy US government bonds, but not only THEM. more correct to say, INCLUDING, we are buying US government bonds. Money should work. So they need to be placed in some kind of assets that make a profit.
                      And the man categorically declared that it was in the interests of the United States. To some extent it is, but in ours too. In addition to US bonds, there are bonds of other countries. The most profitable option is selected. This is an economy and nothing more. Yes, now that the United States is extremely unfriendly, it doesn’t look very good, but sorry to post Uruguay bonds with zero income because of this is also not interesting. Well, and as an example, I will give you the fact that the main holder of US government bonds is China. Are they all corrupt, too, or what? And I am already silent that this is a great economic bomb. And if we with China demand our investment back? I think the US will go broke. So this is also a trump card in the sleeve.
                      5. The calculation is not entitled to credit the government. that is how it should be. otherwise, the Ministry of Finance, instead of raising the economy and achieving a budget surplus, will constantly take loans from the Central Bank. This is a very important and I would say the cornerstone question. Admitting the opportunity to lend to the Ministry of Finance mediocrity, you can generally stop any development of the economy. Why would they strain there and take some steps if it would be possible to take a loan from the Central Bank to cover the budget deficit. You have an unemployed relative who constantly asks for money from you. You give them to him. He promises to return, but later, and asks for more. You give again. Relative is satisfied. Stop giving him money and he will run to work. is not it?
                      6. An example of the United States with a loan from the Fed. It is precisely this system that is squalid and fraudulent, which allowed the United States, through paper, to become what they have become. You must also understand that we are talking about all the dollars in general. Not just "as if to cover the deficit." Absolutely all the Fed dollars, the US government takes on its obligations. And this led to trillion US debt. No more. do you want us to have the same? Unfortunately with us, unlike the United States, these debts will be asked.
                      7. Well, about the issue of money, I explained to you in detail above. About pegging to the dollar. I repeat. The dollar is a global reserve currency. So WORLD decided. not us, not a single USA. So decided together all countries. about the fact that the ruble mass is rigidly tied to the dollar, the Central Bank does not say anywhere in the regulatory documentation, which means that it’s all at the gossip level. BUT even if this is so, then in contrast to the USA, we have a different order of issue. Therefore, the printing of money and its actual release into circulation can vary greatly in time. As a result, the issue is carried out completely independently of the availability of gold and foreign exchange reserves. The same billion in Uryupinsk can be put into circulation when the Central Bank does not have gold reserves for that same billion. All of these Eksperds do not know the procedure for issuing money for circulation in the Russian Federation and consider that we have them. well, or it seems. No, it’s not like us. Therefore, there is no direct dependence on the presence of gold reserves in Russia.
                      8. Well, about the fact that the Central Bank is a regional branch of the Fed. Again, we must understand that world trade is based on the dollar. Because it is an international reserve currency. entering the global economy, we are obliged to accept the rules of the game. The whole world has accepted them and we must. There is no other way. I do not rate this. I am stating a fact. Russia, with all its desire, will not be able to unilaterally withdraw from the dollar. No way. A review of the very BASIS of world trade is needed. This is not possible alone. So we play according to the given rules. As for "pleasing the dollar." Our economy consists mainly of the "export" component. And for example, paradoxical as it sounds, ruble appreciation (especially rapid) will simply ruin our export enterprises. so that our economy is quite profitable for the low exchange rate of the ruble against the dollar. Unfortunately, ordinary people are exactly the opposite.
                      9. As for Russian companies and their debts to Western banks. And what is the Central Bank here? The Central Bank does not lend to anyone. He sets the bid. based on your estimates. Commercial banks lend, frankly, they don’t see the banks. The example is simple. the key rate is 9.25, and come to Sberbank and ask for a loan. How many percent will be? twenty? 20?
                      So who ofigel then? Why not 11-12.? Around the world, it is customary to throw 1-2 percent at a key rate. in our country, grabbers in commercial banks throw at least twice. Then Gref from the screens broadcasts to us about the "record income of Sberbank." So there are businesses in Western banks (if possible). As for the key bet itself, it is not taken from the ceiling. and in any favorable situation in the economy, the Central Bank reduces it. But the commercial banks as they robbed their predatory interest, so they are kept. Put the deposit at 5-6 percent. take a loan under 19-22. That's the whole layout. So what about the Central Bank? This is a lending market. Do you want to take, do not want do not take.
                      10. About the attempt to nationalize the Central Bank by Putin. I think it was rash. He still did not understand much. Subsequently, the mechanism was explained to him. And this is essentially a counterbalance mechanism to the Ministry of Finance. This must be clearly understood. HOW ONLY A CB HAS SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT BACCHANALIA WILL BEGIN. The Ministry of Finance will take money from the Central Bank when it pleases. The growth efficiency of the economy will fall. All holes will be closed by the Central Bank’s money, and not by competent management of the economy and finances. This is the path to a very sad future.
                      And in the end. it must be understood that we cannot get away from the dollar alone. We need a powerful coalition. I think Putin is playing such a game. She is very long and dangerous. I hope everything works out. And an independent Central Bank is like a saying. "That's why the pike in the pond, so that crucian would not doze off."
      2. Olgovich
        Olgovich April 22 2018 08: 54
        +2
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        What to do in current conditions?
        Option 1

        It is unrealistic, because Russia’s simply have NO forces and means comparable with its counterpart (as the author writes).
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN April 22 2018 15: 38
          0
          Quote: Olgovich
          It is unrealistic, because Russia’s simply have NO forces and means comparable with its counterpart (as the author writes).
          Not a fact ... As Suvorov said, fight not by number, but by skill ...
          That's just
          Only this time the rake will smash the stubborn forehead to smithereens.
          It’s unlikely for a long time ..., here the eggs all over the world are laid ... will be reborn, but it’s possible to calm down by 50 years ... I have one friend who was encoded. Says, well, everyone strangled the "green serpent" in me, a month later, drunk, we ask why so? like a snake killed? They said they killed, only he had time to lay eggs ... now they hatch ... laughing
      3. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky April 22 2018 11: 09
        +2
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        What to do in current conditions?
        Option 1

        In my opinion, Russia is just implementing the first two options, which is why it is criticized by particularly "violent" people who demand to go, as they like to say, to "preventive strikes" in order to crush the adversary to dust, losing sight of the fact that this option leads to mutual annihilation.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack April 22 2018 11: 53
            0
            Quote: luk
            In my opinion, we are just fluctuating from the second to the third

            And what exactly led you to this, um, thought?
            You see: Your conclusions, while there is no justification for them, cost absolutely nothing.
            On the other hand, if you try to substantiate your mistakes - IMHO it can turn out, um ... not without interest.
            Let's try? wink
      4. Hlavaty
        Hlavaty April 22 2018 11: 16
        +14
        What to do in current conditions?

        The author listed many points, but forgot the most important thing - the moral state of the Russians themselves. If the morale of the troops is low, then no weapons and no strategy / tactics will lead to victory.
        To begin with, the Russians should cut this “anaconda loop” in their own heads.
        In recent years (after the Maidan), reading the comments of many "Russians", you can see a quiet victory of the West, which many do not even realize -
        Russians began to abandon the lands considered Russian.
        On the example of Ukraine it is very clearly seen that this rejection occurs in the mass consciousness. How many conversations are like, “Why do we need Ukraine and millions of parasites of crypto-Bandera ?!”, “Ukraine is a sovereign state and the Russian Federation should not interfere in their internal affairs”, etc. .. In fact, these conversations cover up one very important fact:

        The Russians stopped considering these lands Russian! So in the soul they have already abandoned them!

        And here it doesn’t matter what kind of land we are talking about. The important thing is that, as Gorbachev said: "The process has begun!". Today it is Ukraine, tomorrow it can be any other. There are many candidates outside the Moscow Ring Road. If you managed to convince the Russians that Ukraine is not Russian land, then it is quite possible to convince them that Kaliningrad Oblast is German land, Smolensk is the former Lithuanian principality, etc.

        Everything that the RF is trying to scare, all these military horror stories, billions on new missiles and planes, war like Syria, all this the West uses to distract the Russians from the real war that it is waging in their heads. And it is far from unsuccessful: the children in the Reichstag are beginning to apologize for Russia, the memorial plaques Kolchak and Manerheim are being installed, the monuments to Krasnov are being erected in the Kuban, the Katyn is being repaired, and much more. I don’t even want to talk about historical films, sexual minorities, popular culture and, praised by the Tagged, “universal values”.
        So, while the Russians pump their muscles (army and weapons), they simply quietly "endure their brains" and drain their souls. I don’t think that the West wants to arrange a world nuclear war — hardly such fools are there.
        Therefore, I think that all this deliberately demonstrated military threat serves only to divert the attention of Russians from a long and really ongoing war on a completely different "quiet" front.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Z_G_R
          Z_G_R April 22 2018 12: 26
          0
          absolutely agree.
        3. EwgenyZ
          EwgenyZ April 22 2018 13: 03
          +5
          Quote: Hlavaty

          The Russians stopped considering these lands Russian! So in the soul they have already abandoned them!

          You, it seems, started correctly, but then .... I understand your indignation at the Manerheim board in St. Petersburg. But what problems with Kolchak? This statesman was precisely for the "One and Indivisible", and you him in the company of Manerheim and Krasnov. I am sure that if he had lived before the Great Patriotic War he would have made the same choice as Denikin. By the way, Russians began to accustom to the fact that Russian lands were no longer Russian not thirty years ago, but much earlier, somewhere in 1917, when they began to divide Russia into specific national principalities of the Soviet Socialist Republic and ASSR.
          1. Hlavaty
            Hlavaty April 22 2018 13: 11
            +4
            Quote: EwgenyZ
            But what problems with Kolchak?

            "Problems" were discussed on the same site: https://topwar.ru/103797-kolchak-predatel-i-gosud
            arstvennyy-izmennik-dvoynoy-agent-svidetelstvuet-
            sovetnik-prezidenta-vilsona.html

            Quote: EwgenyZ
            By the way, the Russians began to accustom to the fact that the Russian lands were no longer Russian not thirty years ago, but much earlier, somewhere from 1917, when they began to divide Russia into specific national principalities of the USSR and ASSR.

            You know, and from the time of the USSR, I still have the feeling of one huge Motherland - without any "principalities". Even service in the Soviet army could not shake this sensation. smile
            1. EwgenyZ
              EwgenyZ April 22 2018 13: 26
              +1
              Quote: Hlavaty
              "Problems" were discussed on the same site: https://topwar.ru/103797-kolchak-predatel-i-gosud
              arstvennyy-izmennik-dvoynoy-agent-svidetelstvuet-

              sovetnik-prezidenta-vilsona.html

              And about Kolchak, and about Trotsky, and about Lenin, much can be said, by the way, Stalin was also recorded as spy, but only of the tsarist secret police. What do you think: if Kolchak was a Western agent, would the masters abandon him to the mercy of fate? As far as I understand, claims from Kolchak on the part of the Communists in the means of warfare, but for some reason the neo-Bolsheviks are missing one small milestone - there was a civil war, and civil wars are always cruel, and the Reds were not angels either, it just so happened that they won and wrote their story.

              Quote: Hlavaty
              You know, and from the time of the USSR, I still have the feeling of one huge Motherland - without any "principalities". Even service in the Soviet army could not shake this sensation. smile

              Duck, where did all this go, why did everything fall apart so easily? And the collapse passed just along the borders of the Soviet Socialist Republics and ASSRs.
              1. Hlavaty
                Hlavaty April 22 2018 14: 47
                +6
                Quote: EwgenyZ
                why did everything fall apart so easily?

                I have my opinion on this matter, but I do not pretend that it will explain everything.
                I think the collapse of the USSR began when Khrushchev declared that the next generation of Soviet people would live under communism. Prior to this, people perceived communism as a kind of separate bright future. With more than one generation, much needs to be done for this future to come. A kind of "paradise on earth." Many believed in such a bright future, and were ready to work hard so that "if not children, then maybe grandchildren-great-grandchildren ..."
                And when the bald adventurer blurted out that this future was already near, almost "around the corner", many realized that they were simply lying. In the most arrogant and cynical way. People still huddle in barracks and communal apartments, there is not enough bread, and they are told here that tomorrow there will be plenty. Here, many simply lost faith. And when faith disappears, the body comes out in the first place.
                And the race for material wealth began. As they used to say "thingism." And also from above, the party elite constantly mutters about "increasing the welfare of the Soviet people" - like approving. Well, it went and went: only material ideas remained of ideas.
                And when the spirit leaves the body, it dies. This happened with the Union: when the idea that created it died, the Union itself died.
                1. EwgenyZ
                  EwgenyZ April 22 2018 17: 10
                  +2
                  Quote: Hlavaty
                  I have my opinion on this matter, but I do not pretend that it will explain everything.

                  You know, in many respects I agree with you. I also think that the Soviet Union "ended" with the death of Stalin, with a speech by Khrushchev at the 20th Party Congress, with the purchase of the first ton of wheat abroad. And then it was the beginning of the end ....
                  Quote: Hlavaty
                  And when the spirit leaves the body, it dies. This happened with the Union: when the idea that created it died, the Union itself died.

                  Well, yes. Only now the Soviet ideology actively fought with the "spirit", and when the country won, it disappeared.
            2. New Year day
              New Year day April 22 2018 20: 02
              0
              Quote: Hlavaty
              You know, and from the time of the USSR, I still have the feeling of one huge Motherland - without any "principalities". Even service in the Soviet army could not shake this sensation.

              but after 91 years and sharing the KChF and further life in the territory occupied by Ukraine until 2014, these illusions passed
          2. zoolu350
            zoolu350 April 23 2018 05: 51
            +1
            Kolchak is a traitor to the level of Krasnov. A condottier at the service of His Royal Misery of Small Britain. You did not understand that the ingenious Leninist structure of the USSR is an instrument of EXPANSION, not a sink. Stalin, having all the possibilities to change the Leninist structure of the USSR, did not do this, since he was carrying out an EXPANSION. These great people hoped that their descendants would not be so miserable that they would allow plums.
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. The comment was deleted.
        6. New Year day
          New Year day April 22 2018 19: 50
          +1
          Quote: Hlavaty
          Today it is Ukraine, tomorrow it can be any other.

          do you think that Ukraine having walked around Europe will return on its knees?
          If so, then what are you at the heart of this metamorphosis?
          Or do you think that "Russian lands" are needed for Russia without a population, i.e. Ukrainians?
          Our history has shown that the government simply missed Ukraine because of its incompetence, arguing- "where will it go, Ukraine?" And so, gone.
          Quote: Hlavaty
          The Russians stopped considering these lands Russian

          What do Ukrainians think about this? I already once argued to someone that the vast majority of ATO participants are residents of Central, Eastern and Southern Ukraine. Of the 36 national battalions, only 4 are formed in Western Ukraine. 32 battalions is Zaporozhye. Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, etc.
          Quote: Hlavaty
          all this deliberately demonstrated military threat serves only to divert the attention of Russians from a long and really ongoing war on a completely different "quiet" front.

          I completely agree with you here, but it’s worth clarifying that a consumer society is beneficial to the state as an apparatus, since people are no longer interested in “interesting” and “undesirable” topics such as: ecology, social and substantial stratification, crisis of governance, etc. fight with power?
          1. Hlavaty
            Hlavaty April 22 2018 23: 03
            +1
            Quote: Silvestr
            do you think that Ukraine having walked around Europe will return on its knees?

            I can’t even imagine how it was possible to twist such a conclusion out of my words! In general, not a word was said that someone would return somewhere. And even more so on his knees.
            Do not ascribe to me your thoughts, please.

            Quote: Silvestr
            Quote: Hlavaty
            The Russians stopped considering these lands Russian
            What do Ukrainians think about this?

            Ukrainians think so that the Russians stopped considering these lands Russian.

            Quote: Silvestr
            I already once argued to someone that the vast majority of ATO participants are residents of Central, Eastern and Southern Ukraine

            And why did you prove this to someone? Rather, what do you want to prove this?
            It’s very slippery to use bare statistics as evidence.
            Your numbers can be interpreted as you like.
            You can say that “residents of Central, Eastern and Southern Ukraine” are more anti-Russian than residents of western Ukraine.
            And I can say that mobilization in Central Ukraine is much easier than in Western. We just drove the buses to the factory entrance and packed young men. And in Western Ukraine, there are practically no factories anymore and the population has long been earning money abroad, and you can’t gather a lot in the mountains and villages.
            These are two completely different views on the same numbers.
            1. New Year day
              New Year day April 23 2018 14: 11
              +1
              I mean that you are applying for lands belonging to today's Ukraine. Whether you like it or not, hl is an independent Ukraine, which has been profiled since EBN. And the Ukrintsy and Russians live there, who do not see themselves with Russia. That's all. You can sprinkle your head with ash, but to no avail
          2. iouris
            iouris April 23 2018 00: 01
            0
            The picture shows Russian people in the era of feudalism. There were no Ukrainians then, Ukrainians appeared in connection with the First World War.
      5. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be April 23 2018 08: 26
        0
        The Eternal Question - What to do?
        Become a crocodile caiman .. laughing
        "Most often, anacondas are subjected to predation by crocodile caimans, with which they occupy similar biotopes .. Caimans are usually prey to calves, as well as adult males, weakened after mating, but in two recorded cases, large (about 2 meters) males of crocodile caimans become a victim adult females anacondas about 5 meters long .. "
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS April 22 2018 12: 30
      +4
      Quote: aszzz888
      "What are they doing to us?"

      All this, of course, is well said and correct ... but first of all, it is necessary to give the people an ideology. Without it, no changes to the Constitution, no new missiles, reforms in the financial and industrial sphere, etc. will change the state of things, from the word at all.
      About the 5th column. Sometimes thinking about this topic, I think, what would the Chubais, Kudrins, etc. do in China, for example?
      1. New Year day
        New Year day April 22 2018 19: 42
        +2
        Quote: NEXUS
        and what would the Chubais, Kudrins, etc. do in China, for example?

        quartered
      2. zoolu350
        zoolu350 April 23 2018 05: 56
        0
        His eyes were gouged out, his tongue was pulled out, his arms and legs were chopped off in turn, and his spine was cut, because simply shooting them is too easy a punishment.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS April 23 2018 08: 46
          0
          Quote: zoolu350
          His eyes were gouged out, his tongue was pulled out, his arms and legs were chopped off in turn, and his spine was cut, because simply shooting them is too easy a punishment.

          I was talking about the Chinese, not the Zulu tribe. No.
    3. Rus2012
      Rus2012 April 22 2018 14: 36
      0
      Quote: aszzz888
      By the way, our Russian Defense Ministry does not comment on this. Maybe there is such a fact, but maybe not

      ... to hell with these things to comment? ALWAYS dealt with this! As they are (not diligently and lazily) so are we (always neatly and thoroughly) ...

      And what will happen -
      before the inauguration - the third attempt. Having missed TWO blows with axes and “miss” the next run-in - it will not work ...
      The pretext will be the most unreal and defy explanation. Yes, IM is no longer needed for this - the "image is created." The most significant probability is on the LDNR theater. "Fas!" - and that’s it! And the rest is already like saving the dermocratic edge ...
      The main thing, the more ridiculous, the better: and so that the "Russians" could not help but intervene ...

      The facts:
      - Trump - no one in their ranking table (“twitter prez”).
      - The Yankees (especially the top rank) - will “pinpoint” and will try “for another“ agreement. ”But they will not be able to disobey the“ deep government ”. Yes, at the beginning their active actions are not supposed. But how can she get out again in a loach? "- the question is ...
      - Zap.partners no longer have time, therefore the "heady parsing" went recklessly ....
      1. dSK
        dSK April 23 2018 01: 09
        +1
        Quote: Rus2012
        Trump is no one in their ranking table (Twitter prez).

        Judging by the "scribble" on Twitter, Mr. Trump has "manic-depressive syndrome", an annual spring exacerbation.
        60 pieces - at Shairat airbase 7 April 2017 of the year.
        107 pieces April 14 2018 years, both times at four in the morning Moscow time.
        The following is likely to April 2019 air defense specialists have time to prepare well.
  2. apro
    apro April 22 2018 06: 37
    +6
    Sheuf. Fsё lost plaster removed ....
    I woke up ... and when the night passed ...
    Today, Russia is virtually defeated. It cannot economically service itself. It depends financially on the taller. It is impossible to fight against NATO and other threats without diplomacy. It cannot diplomatically defend its own. In the field of enlightenment and education, entirely Western influences can be forgotten about national unity. election results showed how you can bend the people and are not afraid of anything.
    The average Russian is similar to a Western person. Wearing clothes using non-domestic production techniques. The media space is entirely Western.
    New bagotees are pushing for a confrontation with the West. They are being crushed and they are squealing that they are losing money. And they are urging people to share costs. But property in Russia is private ...
    1. Chertt
      Chertt April 22 2018 07: 35
      +6
      Quote: apro
      New bagotees are pushing for a confrontation with the West. They are being crushed and they are squealing that they are losing money. And they are urging people to share costs. But property in Russia is private ...

      From a serious article, you pulled out a piece, turned it over in your own way and ... pity the conclusion
      Quote: apro
      Sheuf. Fsё lost plaster removed ....

      The author spoke about something else. "Do not sleep, the enemy does not sleep" Once already overslept
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack April 22 2018 07: 49
        +6
        Quote: Chertt
        The author spoke about something else. "Do not sleep, the enemy does not sleep"

        The author speaks exactly for couch generals, and at the same time carries a fierce triviality.
        After reading, I wanted to rinse my ears. With bleach laughing
        Quote: Chertt
        From a serious article

        What is the "seriousness"? Article - compilation on a given topic ...
        1. basmach
          basmach April 22 2018 10: 04
          +16
          Dear, it would not hurt you to rinse your brain, with bleach, if they are available. But washing your ears will not help, it will pour into one, it will flow from the other. Well, you, of course, the general is not a sofa-real marshal (it’s known how marshals from colonels are made here in a month). Simply, if there is nothing to say, then they would be silent. After all, as they say in Russia-Shut up, you’ll get off for a smart one.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack April 22 2018 11: 25
            +1
            Quote: basmach
            as they say in Russia-Shut up-for the smart get off

            In-in ... exactly yes
            Quote: basmach
            basmach

            Astmach, damn it laughing
        2. Winnie76
          Winnie76 April 22 2018 11: 32
          +3
          Especially delivered: "while the anaconda sprinkles poison." Autor learn materiel, do not force our brain. Brevity is the sister of talent, which does not smell here.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack April 22 2018 11: 38
            +3
            Quote: Winnie76
            Especially delivered: "while the anaconda sprinkles poison"

            I also noticed this thought.
            IMHO this is one of the best places in the article.
            At least the image is new, fresh and memorable ... GYYY laughing laughing laughing
  3. cedar
    cedar April 22 2018 06: 39
    +15
    Strange authors, with strange articles began to appear in the media, including in ...
    They state the war against Russia, some are informational, some are hybrid, some are third world, some are what, but the conclusion is the same: "In the conditions of the war, let's live how we lived, somehow peacefully."
    The bookmarks of enemy propaganda clearly work in the minds: there is no occupation, there is no colonial dependence, there are no enemies, there is no war, and as a result there is no organized resistance to invaders and enemies. Which is what enemies need. Their propaganda is five points, ours ... And is she ours? Do we have it? But can it be when ideology imposed by enemies is prohibited by ideology?
    Hence the ideological castration of the overwhelming majority of the population and authors, as part of this population propagated by the enemy.
    In these military conditions, there is only one way out. It is necessary to declare martial law and pursue an internal, mobilization policy that will put everything and everyone in their places.
    Putin emergency powers!
    1. apro
      apro April 22 2018 06: 44
      +6
      Quote: cedar
      Putin emergency powers!

      Why else? Or is there simply not enough authority? Or is there no authority at all?
      1. cedar
        cedar April 22 2018 06: 46
        +6
        "What would be wet in the toilet ..."
        1. apro
          apro April 22 2018 06: 55
          +12
          Quote: cedar
          "What would be wet in the toilet ..."

          Who specifically. By the list of pozhlst. Earlier I dipped in the toilet and did not require authority. And now weakened?
          1. cedar
            cedar April 22 2018 08: 23
            +3
            According to the constitution, it was not ordered ... Step to the left, step to the right - execution ...
    2. basmach
      basmach April 22 2018 10: 08
      +15
      That is, for 18 years of simple authority was not enough, it is necessary to give extraordinary. Then you will plow for soldering and a coupon for shoes for the benefit of the oligarchs under the slogan "business is in danger" Here you do not need to give authority, then you need to change the whole system, headed by the one who created it. Then there is a chance
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Alexander Ra
      Alexander Ra April 22 2018 12: 11
      +3
      "Putin emergency powers!"
      Hope for one person is yesterday.
    5. New Year day
      New Year day April 22 2018 20: 07
      +1
      Quote: cedar
      Putin emergency powers!

      for what and against whom?
      The people revered him, the oligarchs are gone. The elite is all grown and tested by him.
      So the question is, what for super authority?
  4. Waddimm
    Waddimm April 22 2018 06: 51
    +8
    About nothing. Many well-known facts, some of them far-fetched. The conclusion is banal. There are no concrete proposals on how to “cut the anaconda loop”.
    The author, why was he spending the letters?
    1. cedar
      cedar April 22 2018 06: 55
      +2
      The more letters, the more fees ...
      1. Russia
        Russia April 22 2018 07: 20
        +6
        Liberals start, instead of greeting "good morning."
    2. Chertt
      Chertt April 22 2018 07: 29
      +3
      Quote: Waddimm
      There are no concrete proposals on how to “cut the anaconda loop”.

      You need a simple solution, such as "press the red button." You see a schoolboy, otherwise you would have known that there is no easy way out of the struggle not for life, but for death, which has been going on for many decades (if not centuries)
    3. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack April 22 2018 07: 53
      +4
      Quote: Waddimm
      About nothing. Many well-known facts, some of them far-fetched. The conclusion is banal

      A plus.
      Quote: Chertt
      You see, I’m a schoolboy, otherwise you would know that there is no easy way out of the struggle not for life, but for death, which has been going on for many decades (if not centuries)

      The amazing depth of thought.
      Of course, there is no easy way out. As well as real information about what is happening - it, of course, also does not exist.
      The only question is, why did the author even tackle the topic, which is clearly ... not Copenhagen?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack April 22 2018 11: 26
          +2
          Quote: luk
          where is the head of the anaconda

          At the opposite end from her own tail yes
          Quote: luk
          then take a comment

          Do not tell me what to do ...
          And the article is a minus, yes. Nothing new - no information, no conclusions ... compilation-s.
          Too lazy to put plagiarism, but a lot of new things and he will not show, IMHO.
          1. zoolu350
            zoolu350 April 23 2018 06: 01
            +1
            Golovan Jack, the majority here at VO know very well where the "head of the Anaconda" is and what to do with it. You only whitewash the oligarchy of the Russian Federation in not wanting to CUT it.
  5. Gardamir
    Gardamir April 22 2018 07: 22
    +16
    fight with determination and offensively with the forces and means that are available to us, and which are at least comparable to the forces and means of our counterpart, causing him unacceptable damage. The time available to us, and it is very small, must be used to strengthen our competitive advantages.

    For which I respect the Soviet government, they told us about the American and Israeli military, but they didn’t drag us anywhere. On the contrary, they gave us free education, medicine, apartments. Yes, they didn’t go to Turkey or the Seychelles, but it was safe in the Crimea and he was OUR without any conditions.
    And now the benefits to the government and the oligarchs, and I have to fight. With whom? I’m going to the subway, and I’m the "next station", what have the enemies already captured us? The new head of Udmurtia held a meeting, not in Russian or even in Udmurt, belay in English. So who does the author urge to fight with? And what about the government, the president? For example, they report that they are doing well!
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack April 22 2018 07: 53
      +3
      Quote: Gardamir
      I have to fight

      And someone here at school had a triple in angelic laughing
      1. cedar
        cedar April 22 2018 08: 36
        +2
        By the way, about the triple ... My wife at school in angelic five had a triple.
        I’ve been to Naglia three times, she’s never once.
        Still digging up to me, why did my vision spoil ..?
    2. free
      free April 22 2018 08: 24
      +5
      We still have to fight for our families, for our homeland, for our country. But the enemy is not only outside, but also inside.
  6. dimann271
    dimann271 April 22 2018 07: 26
    0
    Your mother !!! Where, then, were?
  7. alekc75
    alekc75 April 22 2018 07: 48
    +4
    author -> author -> author a lot of breeches about seeds and about the director with a drone. I also mention a lot and sprinkle the article, but I won’t get paid as he
  8. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem April 22 2018 08: 39
    +2
    How many of them were divorced by these "all-scribblers" .. They grow it in an incubator, not otherwise.
  9. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov April 22 2018 08: 50
    +6
    Well started! Knights, Russia, not an inch of land ... laughing The level of hysteria is growing. However, as in the West. The author forgot in the tenths to indicate: COMPRADOR POWER.
  10. Old warrior
    Old warrior April 22 2018 09: 05
    +5
    Two. Either we are them, or they are us. There is no third.
  11. vlad007
    vlad007 April 22 2018 09: 57
    +4
    The author is absolutely not informed about the economic situation in the country. The situation with Ukraine and the return of Crimea required enormous work to create new industries and replace thousands of products produced in Ukraine. It is impossible to do it quickly - you need to build factories, create production, etc. The effect of this work will manifest itself gradually, but it will certainly be.
    1. AleBors
      AleBors April 22 2018 16: 27
      +2
      Let me know, "will manifest gradually" when?
      1. andrej-shironov
        andrej-shironov April 22 2018 18: 40
        +2
        smile And it’s never! At us, all effective managers do not even know the principle of SMART, as applied to goal-setting.
        1. AleBors
          AleBors April 22 2018 19: 30
          0
          For some reason, I also think so ... hi
  12. Alsur
    Alsur April 22 2018 10: 08
    +5
    Very ambiguous article. It seems to be written by a patriot, but in fact all the facts are presented in a negative plan for Russia, i.e. the author refers to all-proponents. And the only way out of creating a circle of negative events is generally good - to chop off the head of the anaconda, i.e. work out the Strategic Missile Forces on the territory of the likely enemy and start the third world war. Those. implicitly, the reader is informed that there are simply no favorable options for Russia, only to surrender to the grace of the fittest and destroy Russian statehood. We conclude that the author is a provocateur. What I would like to answer the author, let's recall the pre-war period of the USSR, starting with the creation of the Soviet state and until 1941. A country not recognized by anyone, against which comprehensive powers imposed comprehensive sanctions. I recall that even during the pre-war rule of Stalin, ships with ores, metals, and so on, which were in short supply for the country of soviets, were seized and confiscated quite a lot. The country's leadership gritted its teeth, but could not do anything, looked for other options, incurred financial losses in a poor country. Doesn’t resemble anything? Although the similarities between that and the current periods, it should be noted, we are in a much better position. We are recognized, we can legally trade, though it is they who just want to change the sanctions, isolate us and be able to block all our trade. Further, the worst possible option is the German attack. Well, you know the further story.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. andrej-shironov
      andrej-shironov April 22 2018 18: 58
      +3
      Alexei, it seems to me that you, like the author of the article, pour water on someone else’s mill. The Soviet Union and modern Russia with its comprador power should not even come close.
  13. Cannonball
    Cannonball April 22 2018 10: 11
    +7
    History has repeatedly proved that:
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. andrej-shironov
      andrej-shironov April 22 2018 18: 59
      0
      smile And Stalin would have simply ... gone to Churchill! laughing
  14. prodi
    prodi April 22 2018 10: 16
    +7
    the simplest is raising rates: the complete breakdown of all relations with most Western countries, the withdrawal of all military, political and most economic agreements, and the extremely tough, even excessive, protection of the existing "status quo". In 10-20 years, other, most likely, more adequate people will appear and it will be possible to start the reboot
    1. misti1973
      misti1973 April 22 2018 15: 17
      +1
      In general, to turn the country into a concentration camp. And you yourself probably see yourself as the boss?
      1. prodi
        prodi April 22 2018 15: 52
        +1
        Well, if the prisoners are like you, of course, I can’t refuse smile
  15. Clueless
    Clueless April 22 2018 10: 21
    +6
    “Much has been said about the“ fifth column ”. But where are the real measures to neutralize it? It seems that corruption has somehow begun to be fought, but it is precisely the“ fifth column ”, coupled with the liberal opposition, that puts sticks in the wheel of real economic development. And we on all state television channels, liberals, and with them invited Western and Ukrainian “experts,” receive royalties for the dirty lies they pour on our country. "
    Well, yes .. liberals are stealing from us :)) Under Hitler, the Jews were to blame for everything, under Putin liberals :))))

    Dear, a country can be competitive only when there is competition in politics. The lack of competition leads to the nonsense that we recently saw in Kemerovo, when the governor apologized not to the residents, but to the president, and called the audience on the square with busers.

    I personally do not particularly recall in the past 5 years that the liberals would steal as intensely as current politicians. And the laws of Yarovaya and others, according to censorship, are adopted not by liberals.
  16. Clueless
    Clueless April 22 2018 10: 22
    +2
    Quote: ALSur
    Very ambiguous article. It seems to be written by a patriot, but in fact all the facts are presented in a negative plan for Russia, i.e. the author refers to all-proponents .....


    The author has one thought - to shoot everyone and trust the party 100 percent. True, the party will remain intact, but ordinary citizens will put their heads, this is not a word :)
  17. Alsur
    Alsur April 22 2018 10: 38
    +1
    Quote: Bad
    I personally do not particularly recall in the past 5 years that the liberals would steal as intensely as current politicians. And the laws of Yarovaya and others, according to censorship, are adopted not by liberals.

    This censorship has been given to you. In the USA or Great Britain can anyone say that chem. attack is a provocation. Watch a video interview with a former WB intelligence general - http://www.yaplakal.com/forum28/topic1772206.html
    Here you have the whole democracy. Or remember how the girl was cut off on US television in Abkhazia. To whom you powder your brains, democracy is needed only as an excuse for interfering in the affairs of other countries. For example, here is a quote from a great Western politician: on May 12, 1919, Winston Churchill said: “I strongly support the use of poisonous gases against uncivilized tribes. The moral effect should be so good that human losses should be reduced to a minimum. There is no need to use only the deadliest gases: gases that cause significant inconvenience, can quickly be terrifying and at the same time do not have permanent, serious effects on most exposed gases. " So how do you like it?
  18. Alsur
    Alsur April 22 2018 10: 46
    +1
    Quote: Bad
    Dear, a country can be competitive only when there is competition in politics. The lack of competition leads to the nonsense that we recently saw in Kemerovo, when the governor apologized not to the residents, but to the president, and called the audience on the square with busers


    A country can be competitive if it completely dominates the world. US politicians talk about this constantly at all levels. Hitler did the same with the economy, and we remember that almost all of Europe worked for him. But there was no competition there, I hope you believe me.
    1. misti1973
      misti1973 April 22 2018 15: 13
      0
      What politicians said this? Competition and dominance are the exact opposite. Here are the conditions for development, another thing!
  19. Alsur
    Alsur April 22 2018 10: 52
    0
    Quote: Bad
    Quote: ALSur
    Very ambiguous article. It seems to be written by a patriot, but in fact all the facts are presented in a negative plan for Russia, i.e. the author refers to all-proponents .....


    The author has one thought - to shoot everyone and trust the party 100 percent. True, the party will remain intact, but ordinary citizens will put their heads, this is not a word :)

    Something your idea did not understand, you did not emerge from the past, with the party. Remember, the Communist Party is gone.
  20. Altona
    Altona April 22 2018 11: 01
    +2
    Quote: cedar
    In these military conditions, there is only one way out. It is necessary to declare martial law and pursue an internal, mobilization policy that will put everything and everyone in their places.

    ----------------------------
    Carry out political information, training anxiety, and, if necessary, seize your personal car in favor of the state. Are you ready for it? If you are a "businessman", then oblige you to purchase materials and components for 2 years of trouble-free operation of your enterprise, the so-called mobility reserve. Are you ready for it?
  21. Beholder
    Beholder April 22 2018 11: 22
    +3
    Quote: alekc75
    author -> author -> author -> author
    / filter -> a lot of breaches - about seeds and about a director with a drone. I also mention a lot and an article to sprinkle - but they won't pay me like him


    About seeds - at work came across. Two companies supply seeds to the south of Russia, approximately 60-80 percent. The remaining suppliers are subsidiaries or affiliates. I won’t give names, so as not to create advertisements (very sonorous, they are engaged in chemistry, cosmetics, medicines, baby food and so on - how do you like a little list?) I’ll just say that they didn’t hide themselves in the zero ones, but now they’re quietly working under the signs " independent from them experienced laboratories. They supply varietal seeds and .... ba-bam .... chemistry to protect these seeds from all sorts of diseases. The main warehouses were located in Ukraine until 2015, but now I don’t know.
  22. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 22 2018 11: 25
    +3
    Everything is certainly wonderful with the author, put everything on the shelves, made sensible suggestions. But ... One involuntarily wants to ask: material for whom? For VO readers, on whom little depends, or a reference to the GDP table, but the author himself writes that he warned back in 2000, but, like, there’s no reaction. The question arises: if everything is so bad, then how will we help the Russian Federation with its liberoid inclinations? From this article to us mere mortals, it is difficult to understand. At least I did not understand. We (readers of VO, it seems to me that the GDP doesn’t read it for sure) and so, because of our capabilities, some from the couch, and some from the service or in the service of the place are defending the interests of the Russian Federation. Even the trolls are different, coming to the site, and they do not beat themselves in the chest, sentencing-I bourgeois them! Therefore, I would like the analytics with the proposals to be closer to the common people, and not to the GDP table!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  23. iouris
    iouris April 22 2018 11: 29
    0
    The loop cannot be cut, when it is tightened to the limit, it may become obvious that this line of defense is the last. Then either-or.
  24. Curious
    Curious April 22 2018 11: 48
    +1
    I thought that the work of Samsonov will give its result. "Their mournful labor will not be lost." Here we have the first creative experiments of the "Samson school". I can imagine what will happen when these seeds give abundant seedlings and all the "chicks of Samsonov’s nest" take to the wing .. The noosphere may not stand it.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Curious
        Curious April 22 2018 13: 41
        +3
        You do not know who Samsonov is? Yes, this is a local star, who gets up in the "historical delirium" genre. Open the "History" section or in the search for the "Samsonov" suite, score.
  25. APASUS
    APASUS April 22 2018 12: 21
    +5
    It’s not necessary to cut the Anacond’s loop, but first of all to restore order within the country, build a normal economic policy in the interests of Russia, deal with the Central Bank and build a normal monetary system subordinate to the Government, and not to Uncle Sam. As long as the economy is the foundation of the foundations, we generally live off slogans and oil. And of course, the internal position of traitors in power. It's time to get rid of the legacy of Gorbachev-Yeltsin. They want to do business, then at my own expense - I'm talking about comrades Chubais and Co. !!
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack April 22 2018 12: 28
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      build a normal monetary system subordinate to the Government

      So they took it, and in just two words they ruined everything ... and so everything turned out exemplary request
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Hlavaty
      Hlavaty April 22 2018 13: 16
      +4
      Quote: APASUS
      economics foundation

      It was already under Khrushchev and Brezhnev. Ended up in counter-revolution.
      The basis of the basics is people. If you don’t think about their upbringing, but only feed, then their foreign uncles will educate them. And your whole economy will work for these uncles.
      As it generally happens today ...
      1. APASUS
        APASUS April 22 2018 13: 25
        0
        Quote: Hlavaty
        The basis of the basics is people. If you don’t think about their upbringing, but only feed, then their foreign uncles will educate them. And your whole economy will work for these uncles.

        It is difficult to argue from such positions, there are many components in the economic success of the country, and of course people too.
        Quote: Hlavaty
        As it generally happens today ...

        This is a feature not only of Russia. In China, people are not generally thought of in principle.
        1. Hlavaty
          Hlavaty April 22 2018 18: 52
          +4
          Quote: APASUS
          It is difficult to argue from such positions, there are many components in the economic success of the country, and of course people too.

          Your horses and carts are messed up smile The country's economic success is first born in people's heads, and then they translate it into reality. A vivid example of this is the industrialization of the 30's.

          Quote: APASUS
          In China, people are not generally thought of in principle.

          Who told you that? They just think about people there not as it seems to a "white civilized" person. In China, a lot of attention is paid to educating people. By the way, an interesting point: when a dozen Chinese people settle in any place on the planet, a cell of the Chinese Communist Party is created there without fail. So China is very sensitive to the education of its people.
          Just for white people, it can sometimes look like training. But here it is difficult for us to judge how to properly educate one and a half billion people.
          1. APASUS
            APASUS April 22 2018 19: 26
            0
            Quote: Hlavaty
            Your horses and carts are messed up. The country's economic success is first born in people's heads, and then they translate it into reality. A vivid example of this is the industrialization of the 30s.

            Now, only the economy is not born in the minds of the masses, the masses are only performers, but in the heads of leaders. In general, not a large group of people.
            Quote: Hlavaty
            Who told you that? They just think about people there not as it seems to a "white civilized" person. In China, a lot of attention is paid to educating people. By the way, an interesting point: when a dozen Chinese people settle in any place on the planet, a cell of the Chinese Communist Party is created there without fail. So China is very sensitive to the education of its people.

            Caring for brainwashing is presented to you as caring for people, you are very deeply mistaken! So far, there have been no pensions in caring for people in China, and only now a wretched semblance is emerging.
            1. Hlavaty
              Hlavaty April 22 2018 23: 08
              0
              Quote: APASUS
              Caring for brainwashing is presented to you as caring for people, you are very deeply mistaken! So far, there have been no pensions in caring for people in China, and only now a wretched semblance is emerging.

              Your message was originally erroneous. You proceed from the fact that the state should take care of a person, but in reality it should not do anything to people. Any state simply formats its citizens to fit its needs. And here it is important how the needs of the state coincide with the needs of people. The more matches - the steeper the results.
              1. APASUS
                APASUS April 23 2018 18: 24
                +1
                Quote: Hlavaty
                Your message was originally erroneous. You proceed from the fact that the state should take care of a person, but in reality it should not do anything to people.

                What is my message wrong?
                The state is interested in the product. A person is interested in selling his skills and at the moment their interests coincide.
                But breaking the relationship, the state loses interest in the employee, so in whose interests did the employee work?
        2. zoolu350
          zoolu350 April 23 2018 06: 07
          +1
          In China, they just think about people, moreover about ALL Chinese, and not just about individuals of the oligarchy as in the Russian Federation.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack April 23 2018 06: 29
            +2
            Quote: zoolu350
            In China, they’re just thinking about people, moreover, about ALL Chinese

            They don’t even really know how many Chinese there are. laughing
            Million more, a million less ... "and who considers them there?" (with).
            But they think at the same time, of course, "about everyone" yes
            1. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 April 23 2018 06: 52
              0
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              They don’t even really know how many Chinese there are.

              Their name is Legion ... crying
  26. misti1973
    misti1973 April 22 2018 15: 06
    +1
    If anyone does what is with us, it’s us ourselves! What kind of nonsense about "rebellious Russia"? Author, do you know a story? Russia has always been a backward country. All the emperors in our country are not of Russian blood and invited here foreigners: engineers, architects, etc. Even industrialization became possible only thanks to American technical specialists! All other statements are of the same plan. Propaganda!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. kan123
      kan123 April 23 2018 09: 33
      0
      And when the USA industrialized, did they get it out of their asses? The USA and France were agrarian countries in the mid-nineteenth. The country of collective farmers. The USA had neither aviation nor tank building, nothing - they could not even create a tank - they did not have the technology (!!!) to make a tower - for t3. Churchill handed them all the patents, and aviation, a nuclear bomb, and good automobile manufacturing appeared.
      What does this nonsense mean, about copying? In Egypt, chariots were invented, and the whole world began to ride chariots. In India, they came up with stirrups, and everyone began to ride with stirrups - it became possible to shoot from a horse with a bow - the chariot was no longer needed. What does Russia have to blame for this, where it’s a national hobby, to invent is Russophobia, you’re my friend racist and fascist. In general, undercut Comrade Stalin.
  27. dDYHA
    dDYHA April 22 2018 15: 18
    +2
    Barin idle always says that there are only enemies around.
  28. Klaus
    Klaus April 22 2018 15: 49
    0
    It is very good that the authors-publishers begin to show respect for readers. This is me about the list of sources. It is necessary for others to take an example.
  29. AleBors
    AleBors April 22 2018 16: 26
    +2
    Regarding what to do, option 1 would be best. Only there is no one to put it into practice, and, unfortunately, time has been lost ... Everything is planned to roll back to option 3. Only some people call this movement "stability."
  30. Anatoly Yakovlev
    Anatoly Yakovlev April 22 2018 18: 56
    0
    do what?
  31. Golovan Jack
    Golovan Jack April 22 2018 19: 13
    +1
    Quote: Tatanka Yotanka
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Well, and maybe - Kotonosov?

    I offer Fedorov and his GCD in the mine; they all shout more about it

    Scream and
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    composition prove

    - these are two different things yet ... no?
    1. Tatanka Yotanka
      Tatanka Yotanka April 22 2018 20: 52
      +1
      Quote: Golovan Jack
      Scream and

      so they hold rallies across the country, demand a referendum, they refer to Putin everywhere, and most importantly, the authorities don’t just give any assessment of their actions, whether they fool people’s head, or the Central Bank really under the Fed
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack April 22 2018 20: 55
        +1
        Quote: Tatanka Yotanka
        and most importantly, the authorities don’t give any assessment of their actions, either they’re fooling people, or the Central Bank is really under the Fed

        Well, the right thing is "not giving" ... a fly flies, buzzes ... and let it buzz itself request
        If everyone is given, it will break ...
        1. Tatanka Yotanka
          Tatanka Yotanka April 22 2018 21: 00
          +1
          flies of the house of creation are not desirable))) they are either poisoned with dichlorvos or nailed with a slipper, everything is allowed with this, therefore, the authorities want the people to really think so the Central Bank - the Fed branch
  32. tank64rus
    tank64rus April 22 2018 19: 51
    0
    End betrayal and traitors. And you know, they will immediately begin to talk with us in a completely different way.
  33. Tatanka Yotanka
    Tatanka Yotanka April 22 2018 20: 39
    +1
    Quote: Silvestr
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    proved that the Central Bank is engaged in just such an activity? Someone besides the local "onolitegs"?
    and I agree with Jack. We evaluate any acts based on our own experience and rely on our knowledge,

    that's the ficus)))) that the main onolithics in this area are the supporters of GDP who see the Central Bank as a branch of the Fed, and explain the presence of liberals in the economic bloc, fellow
  34. hoopoe
    hoopoe April 22 2018 20: 47
    +3
    Quote: Gardamir
    I’m going to the subway, and I’m the "next station", what have the enemies already captured us? The new head of Udmurtia held a meeting, not in Russian or even in Udmurt, in belay English. So who does the author urge to fight with? And what about the government, the president? For example, they report that they are doing well!

    But is it different in the US raw material colony? Where are our stabilization funds? In evergreen rubles?
  35. vladikod
    vladikod April 22 2018 21: 14
    +1
    The right idea ... to chop off the head of the anaconda ... I would like to hope that underwater drones with nuclear weapons are in place and ready for a strike to chop off the head of the anaconda ......
  36. Yuri dzen
    Yuri dzen April 22 2018 21: 15
    0
    We need to seek and promote talented and capable people. You can only survive thanks to smart brains. Give them conditions and we will be happy
    1. dSK
      dSK April 23 2018 01: 22
      0
      Quote: Yuri dzen
      Only smart brains can survive

      One mind will not help, "evil genius" is a miracle bully vishche something else.
  37. BOPOH50
    BOPOH50 April 22 2018 23: 03
    0
    Here I read, read ... The anaconda loop ... mmm, but for whom? As Philip of Macedon said, “A donkey loaded with gold will take any city.” Gorbachev rolled, Yeltsin rolled, Putin
    Well, they’ll wait for the next and squeeze, and as always, they will not even ask the people. As for TMV, it’s already going on and the generals in it are not generals, but heads of transnational corporations, and naturally their weapons are not bombs and missiles, but money. In Russia, their own corporations are emerging, which need a space for activity, somewhere the west has squeezed out, but when the west is crowding out, then rockets, bombs, stools will fly into us, and for now with a creak, the west is very clumsy but is losing ground, somewhere we are them, somewhere they are us. So TMV is already underway. Perhaps we are not engaging in bribing members of other governments, but who knows what will come, money is a very powerful weapon that it would be good for us to master better.
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. kan123
    kan123 April 23 2018 09: 26
    0
    But what’s the hike there - they simply break all ties with anyone, they break the world system, because it has reached an impasse. Anyone who can be here will be authorized, and the Russian Federation has nothing to do with it. The world in an economic sense, is something like middle Siberia and the Heb. part of the Russian Federation - when there is a storm in Siberia, the European part is calm, and vice versa. The United States still has power, creating crises around the world - which practically gives the dollar a price, and allows it to last another year. The USA takes 100% of the budget on credit. This means that they have a consumption of 200% of production, from the country's income. This is an extremely tragic situation for the USA, they are already eating so much that they can’t survive. Army - ordinary people, solve the crisis in their own way. In general, there are many reasons when the United States attacks, but on the other hand, when did they not?
  40. Tektor
    Tektor April 23 2018 13: 23
    0
    Once we have accepted the battle, now the Russians will fight with the "yellow dogs" purposefully and inevitably. And when the Russian people realize the degree of threat, they usually rally to fight back. And creates a structure adequate environment. And then we are invincible. You just need to analyze our vulnerabilities and plans of "partners", and build reciprocal redoubts in the directions of their main attacks. To exhaust, disorganize and punish. It is necessary to predict the "fields" of future battles, and find methods to counter threats. For example, to parry the threat of our default: we must have the necessary amount of currency to calculate our obligations. It is necessary to find alternative sources of replenishment of reserves, i.e. not from oil and gas. And for this you need to find niches for cooperation in various parts of the world. And trade from our pocket offshore for a crypto that cannot be tracked.
    1. Rey_ka
      Rey_ka April 24 2018 10: 29
      0
      It is necessary to find alternative sources of replenishment of reserves, i.e. not from oil and gas. And for this you need to find niches for cooperation in various parts of the world. And trade from our pocket offshore for a crypto that cannot be tracked.
      Reply Quote Complaint

      You perceive the war regime as some kind of side effect while preserving the remaining functions! If you take the war by analogy with the disease, then a seriously ill person usually does not go to work, but changes his regimen completely mobilizing the body to fight. In World War II, the country completely switched to self-sufficiency. Well, we take the Lend-Lees as pills that helped a little
  41. Alexander Insterburg
    Alexander Insterburg April 23 2018 18: 59
    0
    Only option ONE and the struggle inside the fifth column EVERYWHERE and in the government including !!!!
    1. Alexander Insterburg
      Alexander Insterburg April 23 2018 19: 01
      +1
      I have depicted the Ukrainian flag - but I have nothing to do with Ukraine - I live in the DONETSK PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC !!!
  42. Rey_ka
    Rey_ka April 24 2018 10: 21
    0
    this war lasts more than one millennium war of Hyperboreans and Atlantis. The latter ended with the mutual destruction of a geophysical catastrophe and the migration of peoples
    1. The comment was deleted.
  43. Comrade Kim
    Comrade Kim April 24 2018 13: 23
    0
    "We declare growth relative to the previous fall. Moreover, the very concept of" growth "does not fully characterize its real situation."- as it is written in paragraph 4 of the article.
    But this does not explain the situation as a whole.
    The whole horror is that bravura indicators, for example, about the growth of the GDP of our Motherland, are abstract in relation to a specific person, or a unit of society (family).
    Statistics do not lie, growth, small takes place.
    But because of the monstrous gap in the standard of living, 10% of the richest citizens of Russia and 10% of the poorest, or rather several of the richest families in Russia and total the rest of the population.
    So there is a big, or very big increase in the oligarchs and a big or very big drop in the rest of the population.
    In total, we get + 1,5% of GDP growth in our homeland.
    The rich (several families) are getting richer, the rest of the population is getting poorer.
    Das ist Kapitalismus!

    The fact that lion the share of all money in the Russian economy is created by private credit organizations.
    https://business.tsargrad.tv/articles/falshivomon
    etnichestvo-v-osobo-krupnyh-masshtabah-ili-o-rast
    optannoj-konstitucii-rossii_127402
    “So, the Russian state, represented by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, issues the national currency - the ruble. It follows from paragraph 2 of this article that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is a state authority. I have devoted an infinite number of publications and articles to the disclosure of the gravest violations of article 2, paragraph 75 "The essence of the violations is that the Central Bank is not a de facto state authority. With all the ensuing sad consequences for our country. I leave this painful and wide topic beyond the scope of this conversation."
  44. victor50
    victor50 April 24 2018 15: 04
    0
    Quote: Chertt
    Those. the President, under the current constitution, has no leverage to combat the anti-state activities of his own Central Bank. The conclusion is unambiguous, a change in the Constitution, possibly through a referendum, It seems to me that people are ready for this. And on separate articles (ideology) already requires

    As far as I remember, the president somehow and perhaps even repeatedly hinted at the inviolability of the constitution
    https://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/2
    01803101008-j0ca.htm
    https://iz.ru
    rusnod.ru/novosti/v-rossii/nod-rossii/.../feykovy
    e-novosti-o-nod-1_35729.html
  45. Ivan Zatsepin
    Ivan Zatsepin April 24 2018 15: 21
    0
    Strategists are sofa!
  46. 1970mk
    1970mk April 24 2018 17: 29
    0
    "Unruly Russia ... People" ... You are amazed! Yes, the people have always been slaves! Not by anyone! Petrush the Great officially ordered 90% to be considered serf animals .... and allowed to do whatever they want with them ... That's GREAT! Russia))) People))
    1. kalininmiekl
      kalininmiekl April 28 2018 12: 21
      0
      these "slaves" won more than once, I dare to remind you, who does not want - he does not see (apparently a crest),
      therefore, "rebellious Russia" !!
  47. kalininmiekl
    kalininmiekl April 28 2018 11: 59
    0
    I just don’t understand one thing - we have officially declared war. Sanctions — to do harm by economic methods (and do not try to explain that harm to some individuals is harm to all citizens of Russia), information war — there is no need to explain it, etc. .... Why it is impossible to take and answer with all other available methods: economic - to forbid the British and all those who applied sanctions to people from these countries to earn money, just take and "hang" an umbrella from EW over unfriendly countries. What to fear - we are in a state of war declared to us - it will end only in someone else's victory. What to expect?