Military Review

The OPCW again refused to start monitoring in Eastern Ghouta. What is it this time?

Head of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical weapons Ahmet Uzumczy said that the OPCW mission "is unlikely to be able to start monitoring the situation in the city of Duma today." Recall that the mission of the OPCW should have begun work actually 4 a day ago, but every time it postponed its beginning. At the same time, the OPCW stated that for the time being they were not given the appropriate permission by representatives of the UN security mission. It was planned that such permission could be given today. Did not happen...

According to Mr. Üzümcü, the UN security mission, "today came under fire in the Duma."

From the statement of the head of the OPCW:
The UN Security Mission, which is designed to ensure the work of the OPCW mission, came under fire in the Duma today. In such conditions, our specialists are unlikely to be able to start work today in Eastern Gute.

The OPCW again refused to start monitoring in Eastern Ghouta. What is it this time?

Thus, militants from among those from whom East Guta has not yet been cleansed will use all the possibilities to carry out provocations with the sole purpose that the OPCW mission does not start monitoring in the area. But is there a desire to work at the OPCW itself - a separate question. Will they look for reasons to delay the start of work for an indefinite period?

It is also reported that a Russian soldier was wounded in the Duma. This information is not officially confirmed.
Photos used:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov April 18 2018 15: 22
    What this time?
    Well now, chemical weapons in Ukraine will be used .. hehe Valtsman has long been waiting for his fate! laughing
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana April 18 2018 16: 12
      I already wrote about what the former member of the UN biological weapons commission, military expert Igor Nikulin said about the OPCW, commenting on the OPCW report on the Skripale case.
      The OPCW itself has long been ANGAGED in favor of Britain and the United States and NATO countries against Russia. Namely.
      This once again sheds light on the inaction of OPCW members in the UAR to find out the truth on the spot about the presence of chemical weapons and their manufacture by ISIS militants and militants - wards of the United States, Britain and France.
      I. Nikulin explains this in this way.
      « US intelligence agencies, the CIA and the FBI, have a large dossier on the leadership of the OPCW, on the head of this organization, Mr. Ahmet Uzumju. That is why they keep them on a very short leash. From this we can conclude that this organization is politically correct in relation to the Anglo-Saxon powers, which are very likely both the perpetrators and beneficiaries of this crime, ”Nikulin said.

      See -
      la-na-proizvoditelya? utm_medium = cpc & utm_sourc
      e = lentainform & utm_campaign = & utm_
      term = 1272433 & utm_content = 6229636

      And also see -
      elu-skripalei See
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. ARES623
        ARES623 April 18 2018 18: 08
        Quote: Tatiana
        The OPCW itself has long been ANGAGED in favor of Britain and the United States and NATO countries against Russia.

        Today, all international organizations are more or less involved in geopolitical games. And those organizations in which the positions of the Anglo-Saxons are most strong are used in provocations. This is a predictable situation. Perhaps we need to suspend our membership in the OPCW and declare interest in the development of the chemical industry in the "national economy". For a long time, chemistry should have been paid attention to as a consumer of gas. And instead of fighting for the “flows”, they must be bled and offered goods of higher processing. In general, Miller and Sechin have long been allowed to go under the "press" for the dependence of their industries on foreign technology. Distracted. With poisoning, everything is already clear, the Anglo-Saxons are not interested in either facts or evidence. It must be clearly understood that they will not accept peaceful coexistence, and there will be no equal dialogue with them. We must prepare for the toughest confrontation. There is no turning back. We must curtail our "democratic reforms" and force the state to take control of the economy. A controlling stake and a decisive voice in heavy industry, energy, and transport should be with the state. Only then can economic growth be achieved and scored on “international” institutions.
        1. japs
          japs April 18 2018 20: 59
          The direction of your proposals, Dmitry, is clear. They are correct and logical. Any normal person would take these actions.
          Unfortunately, Dmitry, other people are in power in the country. Those people who brazenly took everything from our people, having appropriated the means of production and natural wealth.
          They require the government of the Russian Federation to “privatize” those leftovers and crumbs that still remain in state ownership. Do not you hear the statements of Medvedev, different curls
          and other HSE graduates?
          To accept your proposals, only one trifle is required, namely, a change in the socio-economic structure. At this stage in our history, this seems impossible.
  2. Dezinto
    Dezinto April 18 2018 15: 23
    This is somehow strange. It is as if the divers refused to dive, because there are sharks, wet water all around. And you can’t breathe without masks. Etc.
    Dry us the ocean then we will study. So what?
    These are experts - chemists being at war, make excuses in a hot spot. ?
    1. andrson
      andrson April 18 2018 15: 55
      Not this way. it all comes back from the silence of Russia.
      1. safar gafarov
        safar gafarov April 19 2018 07: 00
        Well, Russia will speak and what? Do they listen to it? There is only one way out by any means to achieve irretrievable losses from the enemy but to do it by someone else’s hands. Thanks to people who want to take revenge on these beasts in the world it’s getting more and more day by day, but I think this is the prerogative of the special services
  3. Radikal
    Radikal April 18 2018 15: 25
    Complete agreement! Moreover, the head of the organization is the Turks! sad
    1. Separ
      Separ April 18 2018 16: 11
      more precisely - the "leader" of the organization
  4. jovanni
    jovanni April 18 2018 15: 29
    The OPCW again refused to start monitoring in Eastern Ghouta. What is it this time?

    The glasses are foggy, it’s impossible to monitor ...
  5. Operator
    Operator April 18 2018 15: 31
    Not a damn thing - foreign journalists can work in the Duma, but the OPCW mission is not.
  6. Romanenko
    Romanenko April 18 2018 15: 35
    Well, yes, they called them from London or Washington, gave the command to wait for the perfume to come with compromising evidence, or to clean up the compromising materials.
    So they wait ... sss .....
  7. K-50
    K-50 April 18 2018 15: 36
    Maybe they were given such a command, "not in a hurry." Because, if you can’t find it, and actually they aren’t there, evidence is chemical. attack, then pin dosniki will look all in brown. Though they don’t give a damn about public opinion for a long time, sometimes they are looking for more or less suitable facts for their “whitening”. Therefore, they are extremely interested in further slowing down the work of the OPCW commission, which, as a result, can issue "uphill" like: "a lot of time has passed, there is no evidence to collect", which will cover both the grouse and the Britons with frog-eaters.
  8. Sergey985
    Sergey985 April 18 2018 15: 37
    Yes, they are just eager to start working !!! But circumstances, gentlemen, circumstances .... And so, even now ready to proceed! laughing
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 April 18 2018 15: 47
      Yes, yes, get another Nobel Prize ... substitute for shelling, take risks. at least not for them.
      You can send them wherever you go, rubyzachki and other interesting sniff like that British / Amer journalist! their noses will be more precise, they will be determined at once. what gas was used?
  9. mavrus
    mavrus April 18 2018 15: 51
    Quote: DEZINTO
    This is somehow strange. It is as if the divers refused to dive, because there are sharks, wet water all around. And you can’t breathe without masks. Etc.
    Dry us the ocean then we will study. So what?
    These are experts - chemists being at war, make excuses in a hot spot. ?

    The excuses are the same as those of the Dutch investigators for the downed Boeing. One and the same State Department methodology for “investigating” what is clear to everyone.
  10. Russia
    Russia April 18 2018 15: 58
    "The OPCW has again refused to begin monitoring in Eastern Ghouta. What this time?"
    Pour over the feces, dump in fluff and deliver to the nearest border crossing.
  11. Prisoner
    Prisoner April 18 2018 15: 58
    Pull. Then they will moo that the government forces had plenty of time to hide the traces of a chemical attack. These ub-people are completely insolent.
  12. Retvizan 8
    Retvizan 8 April 18 2018 15: 59
    Yes, the outcome of this mission is in any case highly predictable!
    I think no one, even from the most daring forum users, does not expect that, after their research, OPCW experts will go to the official rostrum and announce to the whole world:
    "There was no chemical attack!"
    What will automatically mean - the United States and its allies scumbags and in vain bombed with a confident state!
  13. Fedorov
    Fedorov April 18 2018 16: 01
    They are pissing, afraid to work next to Russian fighters. They’re not really stupid fighters, suddenly they’ll see everything, they will tell ..- will be punished. And there they are present with a specific education, just the Army to their liking.
  14. Slovak
    Slovak April 18 2018 16: 02
    did they not know that there was war in Syria? They will wait for a full settlement.
  15. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov April 18 2018 16: 05
    It is interesting that the shelling of the UN security group is reported by the head of the OPCW, and not the UN itself. Coincidence? I do not think ....
  16. Galleon
    Galleon April 18 2018 16: 08
    This is a striking consequence of replacing the general ethical norm with corporate ethics and political loyalty like “our son of a bitch”. So you get a Western civilization, guided on the basis of lies and greed. And now what to do with them all? They will not change and will not stop. Either destroying them together with all the OPCW and the UNs, or defaming our country and their other opponents is forever and ever increasing.
    What will we choose? What will they choose for us?
  17. Separ
    Separ April 18 2018 16: 10
    How to roll a barrel to Russia - instantly ... all the facts are ready ... how to bleach Russia from international lies right into the bushes.
  18. ochakow703
    ochakow703 April 18 2018 16: 14
    The OPCW is the same WADA. As the hero of the famous comedy used to say - "Everything is stolen before you."
  19. Civilian
    Civilian April 18 2018 16: 15
    One gets the impression that their main “work” is not to start a “work”.
    "wherever you work, just do nothing" sad
  20. Verkhomnapule
    Verkhomnapule April 18 2018 16: 16
    this OPCW is the same litter of amers as the UN, so they are generally not going to monitor anything there along the way !!!
  21. ochakow703
    ochakow703 April 18 2018 16: 17
    And also ... with sadness. We are proud of our great country, only now it does not have a decisive vote in any international organization, not only a decisive vote, but in general - a voice. Sad, however. So what to do?
    1. Zubr
      Zubr April 18 2018 16: 24
      What to do ? Put on all these pseudo-democracy, a thick and big device. They will come to us with offers.
  22. Zubr
    Zubr April 18 2018 16: 19
    Well, what else could be ?! That horseradish is long, then the shirt is short ..
    1. lance
      lance April 18 2018 16: 32
      there is another option, the last one is a hedgehog under the ass ..
  23. bald
    bald April 18 2018 16: 49
    They demanded that they go to the site without Russian specialists and military personnel. I had to agree. And in the middle of the way to slow down and arrange a complete shmon of everyone in the column. It’s not difficult to come up with a reason (note received information that they want to destroy you). I think they would find a "test tube".
  24. Mimohod
    Mimohod April 18 2018 17: 02
    OPCW, OSCE are two imposing organizations of the West, into which their intelligence officers have been introduced, all this tomato farming under the control of the Yankees ...
  25. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 April 18 2018 18: 37
    bring them by force and make them work - otherwise they were not told
  26. APASUS
    APASUS April 18 2018 19: 43
    Very good material on where the legs grow from the poisoning of the Skripals and the pseudo-chemical attack in Ghouta.
    The story about how SAS specialists were captured and not only
    London avenged Moscow for captured in Syria special forces
    The background of the “Skripals case” and the staging of a chemical attack in the Duma
  27. vladikod
    vladikod April 18 2018 21: 38
    This is precisely what this OPCW seeks to do ... sabotage as long as possible and not start monitoring, so that later the Syrian and Russian servicemen “remove” all the evidence or the gas “disappears” ...
  28. bsk_una
    bsk_una April 19 2018 02: 47
    Give the OPCW new underpants, better with diapers, they correspond to their activities! And these are people standing guard over the prohibition of chemical weapons ?! Better not to have than to have such a cowardly and treacherous service.
  29. Sergey Torshilov
    Sergey Torshilov April 19 2018 07: 24
    In short, this Ahmet Uzumju is very afraid of the Americans, he apparently remembers how his predecessor, the current Mr. Bolt, drove the American representative from Trump out of work, apparently this one is also afraid of losing his place and rushing around like a stung one, but wants to, but the “bolt” isn’t gives, is it difficult to come to the place under the cover of Syrian soldiers to take the necessary tests in the presence of witnesses, and only then they are afraid to kill
  30. lance
    lance April 19 2018 15: 06
    something reminds: ahmed, and why are you here, they call !; so why are you sitting ?, shoot!
  31. Konstantin Creek
    Konstantin Creek April 19 2018 15: 09
    To be afraid to give an objective conclusion - will have to answer to the "world hegemon".