Military Review

PLA adopted a new ballistic missile

22
The Chinese army has adopted a new medium-range ballistic missile. TASS Post Central Television of China.


Archive photo

The channel’s website states that the missile “is capable of carrying both nuclear and conventional warheads.” At the same time, neither its name nor the main characteristics are given.

The report says that the transfer of new weapons took place at the location of the PLA missile brigade (the location of the brigade is also not disclosed).

It can be used to deliver rapid nuclear retaliation, as well as accurate strikes on important ground targets, as well as large and medium ships,
writes the edition.

The author of the publication called the rocket "new weapon of intimidation."

The Chinese information portal Sina notes in this connection that we can talk about the modification of a medium-range ballistic missile DF-21, whose flight range is more than 3 thousand km. In China, this rocket is called aircraft carrier killer.
Photos used:
http://www.militaryparitet.com
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. the most important
    the most important April 17 2018 15: 06
    +11
    China is actively working on medium-range missiles ... But Russia cannot do this ... the treaty does not allow it. And such a range of missiles allows you to keep almost the entire territory of Russia at gunpoint. Given that China is completely (or not quite) a friend to us, this is a headache for us more than for US aircraft carriers.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 17 2018 15: 11
      0
      We also need to make such missiles, only with a warhead on fast hypersound, in non-nuclear equipment.
      1. astepanov
        astepanov April 17 2018 15: 45
        +3
        Quote: Vadim237
        We also need to make such missiles, only with a warhead on fast hypersound, in non-nuclear equipment.
        Yes, to swell a couple of hundred million rubles to, say, scare a couple of soldiers or to gouge a field toilet.
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon April 17 2018 17: 21
        +1
        Quote: Vadim237
        We also need to make such missiles.

        And what, we have nothing like that? Who can assess the potential capabilities of the same "Iskander"
    2. Observer2014
      Observer2014 April 17 2018 15: 13
      +1
      the most important
      China is actively working on medium-range missiles ... But Russia cannot do this ... the treaty does not allow it. And such a range of missiles allows you to keep almost the entire territory of Russia at gunpoint.
      Everything is lost! laughing “Poplar” can work on targets in the middle distance. I’m waiting for that so “Poplar” can’t laughing To which I will answer the launches of 2014, study and 2015. “Dagger” does not compensate for medium-range missiles? And a whole layer of cruise missiles.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 17 2018 15: 16
        0
        "Poplar" - a missile is too expensive to use it as a ballistic missile system.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon April 17 2018 17: 26
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          "Poplar" - the rocket is too expensive to use it as a ballistic missile

          When pressed, no one will look at the price tags. Not in the supermarket, tea to choose.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 April 17 2018 18: 04
            0
            Alas, now cost is efficiency and in the army are decisive.
            1. hrych
              hrych April 17 2018 21: 08
              0
              Quote: Vadim237
              Alas, now cost is efficiency and in the army are decisive

              How much does a victory cost?
      2. the most important
        the most important April 17 2018 15: 19
        +2
        All of our missiles are counted and rewritten, but the number of Chinese missiles is not known to anyone, possibly except you. If all is well, then please the rest. But the USSR On the border with China had 30 VA in the main task of which was the destruction of missiles. How much water has already leaked ... the missiles haven’t become smaller, but 30 VA haven’t been around for a long time ...
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon April 17 2018 17: 30
          0
          Quote: the most important
          All our missiles are counted and rewritten,

          I hope that since the 90s, when everything was counted, the "census" is out of date.
    3. rts9900
      rts9900 April 17 2018 15: 19
      +2
      Quote: the most important
      China is actively working on medium-range missiles ... But Russia cannot do this ... the treaty does not allow it. And such a range of missiles allows you to keep almost the entire territory of Russia at gunpoint. Given that China is completely (or not quite) a friend to us, this is a headache for us more than for US aircraft carriers.

      The territory of Russia is large, so it is possible to use non-medium-range missiles in China. But both Russia and China, it is disadvantageous to use nuclear weapons against each other. Countries border, so all radiation will also go to the territory of the attacker. We don’t need to worry about this, we are fine with nuclear weapons, but we have a huge lack of human resources (numbers). In Japan, on a tiny island, almost as many people live as in Russia. 120-125 million live in Japan, 145-148 million in Russia. 300-330 million in the USA, 500-550 million in Europe. There are more than a billion in China and India.
      1. the most important
        the most important April 17 2018 15: 32
        0
        We have few people ... they also divided it into parts according to quasi-states. But in the coming years there is no hope for the reunification of Russia.
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon April 17 2018 18: 35
          0
          Quote: the most important
          We have few people ... they also divided it into parts according to quasi-states. But in the coming years there is no hope for the reunification of Russia.

          All gone, what?
  2. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov April 17 2018 15: 06
    0
    I look and remember our ..! well the Chinese .. hehe
    1. Russia
      Russia April 17 2018 15: 10
      +3
      Well done, well kept.
  3. Storming the Washington
    Storming the Washington April 17 2018 15: 08
    +2
    iskan der urgent lawsuit infringement of copyright rights
    1. Observer2014
      Observer2014 April 17 2018 15: 16
      0
      Storming the Washington (Michael)
      iskan der urgent lawsuit infringement of copyright rights
      wassat I have no words. belay Learn the mathematical part hi
      1. Storming the Washington
        Storming the Washington April 17 2018 15: 20
        +1
        really wrong!? and honest Chinese partners called thieves recourse how ugly it turned out
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon April 17 2018 18: 37
          0
          Before the Iskanders, they crawled along their famous wall.
  4. astepanov
    astepanov April 17 2018 15: 42
    0
    Externally, it looks like the Temp-S complex, ditched under an agreement with the Partners on the destruction of the INF. That machine could be the prototype for many good and useful things.
  5. Evil 55
    Evil 55 April 17 2018 16: 18
    0
    PLA-People Liberate America for the Chinese ..
  6. viktor.
    viktor. April 17 2018 16: 36
    0
    Quote: rts9900
    There are more than a billion in China and India.

    Sorry, but there are more than 2 billion. hi
  7. The comment was deleted.