Guys, do not interfere with the Russian bear!

62


Have you ever wondered why some surnames are always associated with negative? I remember as a child, I was very interested, why did the aborigines actually eat Cook? Others somehow did not try, but Cook ate and did not choke.



But the most incomprehensible is why, over time, even things called in consonance with these last names suffer. Remember Napoleon? The figure is contradictory, but, you see, very extraordinary. Even a brilliant, one might say, figure. And the cake, named after him, is eaten daily!

Or here's a Ford. Put the Americans behind the wheel of a car. And in retaliation that he received? Daily accidents around the world. Well, daily curse about their names. "So that I once again sat in this" Ford "..."

Where does a normal representative of humanity have such thoughts? From life! More precisely, from international life. Imagine how many times daily mention the word "Russian" in the world? And in what context. Where are all these Cooks, Napoleons and the more Ford.

No, but how to respond to our machinations of the West? Which "civilized humanity"? Well, see for yourself. Case Creeper. Everything seems thought out. Place chosen correctly. Travanuli former spy. Well, my daughter in the appendage. But ... cats.

The first puncture with the cat came out. I’ve heard on TV how Maria Zakharova directly asked the presenter (Solovyov) about Mus’s cat and said directly: “Lieutenant Colonel Koshkina continues to carry out her assignment in the UK”.

This is not London's fat Lestrades or Stanley Hopkins. These even catch lazy. But Musa catch the British will never succeed. Colonel Koshkin Russian.

And themselves creaked? Also turned out to be Russian. After applying the most terrible Soviet gas, they decided not to die. All right, only daughter. Young after all. The body is strong. But after all, the former spy himself is in no hurry to take a place in the cemetery. He also decided to leave the hospital.

Of course, you can tell that the military chemists of the USSR also had punctures. Only the USSR has already 27 years as it is, but it turns out there is a defective gas? And no one checked his possible action?

In short, from which side do not approach Russia, everywhere is the same place. Not that which is kissed, is meant. And there even kiss, though not kiss, the situation will not change. The eyes and ears are not only higher, but also on the other side of the body.

Well, in vain the West decided to use the Englishmen who are blunt from the smog. There, even visually, it was obvious that Boria Johnson would even give a hundred points to an American Trump. Donald even knows what a comb is. In other sciences, they are approximately equal. Where the United States and the United Kingdom are located are well known.

But after all, the old proven version with the "white helmets" did not pass. Always passed, and now stalled. How beautiful it was conceived. As soon as we press the militants, we immediately imitate a chemical attack and attack the Syrian troops.

Yes, and the gas is selected the most that neither is proven rechecked - chlorine.



Putin’s Syrians flee in panic and Trump’s Syrians take their place! Victory. Not global, but a victory.

It is clear that the American directors from Hollywood can not unprofessionally relate to art. The performance was prepared for several weeks. Naturally, Russian intelligence is right there. And it began. The head of the Russian General Staff was offended.

He said that the missiles will shoot down. Well, that's fine. That's the war. In a foreign territory. So he also promised to destroy the carriers. Ships, you know, American. I already about the aircraft and do not want to mention.

Of course, many will say: promise does not mean to marry. But what a nuance: if anything, such a party will go, that for the beginning it would be necessary to predict who will not remain with a broken face at all.

And this, a man with a stony face and a strange surname from the UN, Vasily Nebenzya? It seemed to us that with the departure of Churkin, the era of American diplomacy was approaching. Even felt sad for the first time. Where there. There is no diplomatic "slippery" for this Basil. And the back, in my opinion, does not bend. Maybe sciatica? One word - Nebenzya.



"We have repeatedly warned the American side of the possible very negative consequences of their possible use weapons against the legitimate Syrian government, and especially if the use of these weapons - God forbid, of course - will affect our military, who are legally in Syria. "


So what? Right in the face, with all the people. It was possible to show respect. And then the Americans, on the sidelines, we would have thrown something. Or any sanctions lifted. Well, we pretend that America is above all.

So the Americans have to shake the old days. I mean, start preparing for the next dance with axes. And by that old know who became? An old acquaintance of the Crimeans, and the rest of the Russians, the rocket destroyer USS Donald Cook.



The one who so "frightened" the population of the Crimea and the Russian bomber Su-24.

And in a pair he will be the twin brother of USS Porter.



"Bro" "walk" there for several days. May not even hurry. Will be more whole. Moreover, the Israelis and the Arabs have already reported that in the area where the destroyers will be based, Russian planes are already circling. God forbid that "soo" is there.

Of course, with axes, or as the Americans like to call them, “Tomahawks,” destroyers have no problems. By xnumx pieces per craft.

But who can say exactly where these axes will fly? Maybe they, too, "go to the roof," as it was in the Black Sea with the instruments of Donald Cook? Or maybe some “Onyx” П-800 will fly into the board? Alas, today it is more tradition to call a destroyer a ship. RCC made it just a watercraft.

Again, perhaps the name, in the sense of the name, is to blame. They will eat Cook once again ... And they will drink porter.

In general, today, when the world is becoming tougher and tougher, you gradually penetrate and understand the foresight of our military leaders, design bureau leaders, designers and engineers. It was they, often contrary to direct instructions, who saved, saved, and then gave the army and the fleet all that today is the pride of our army.

The West, with its completely unprofessional and illogical approach to Russia and Russians of all nationalities, cannot understand only one thing - Russians do not give up. And combat gas, if it is needed by the Russians, will be combat. No medicine can save him. And the rockets will not fly towards the enemy, but will hit the enemy. And the soldiers will fight, not burn into the air, like a pretty penny.

And no wonder our permanent representative to the UN said about the red line. We have this very trait laid genetically. And it was developed by the experience of previous thousands of years. The experience of our distant ancestors, not very distant ancestors, grandfathers, fathers and older brothers. We really are bears. Someone is brown, and someone is white. Our country is huge.

For someone bears from the fairy tale "Masha and the Bear." Kind, understanding, somewhat clumsy lumps.



Yes, and on foreign lands does not pull us. Sedentary lifestyle. House, garden, grove near. River with perch. Beauty. And nothing else is needed.

But it is only to the point. After the line we are animals that are able to tear all these tigers and lions to shreds, to catch up with the wild horse at full speed. We have no natural enemies in nature. Even the Ussuri tiger, to which all its “brothers” from other lands, like children in size, risk attacking only young bears. A tiger teddy bear breaks quietly, with feeling, plainly and constellation. For pleasure.



Over the last phrase should think those who are going over the line. And donkeys, elephants, and lions ... think hard. And take into account that all bears because of the peculiarities of the diet and large sizes have a significant impact on the flora and fauna of their habitats!

This I mean to the "walkers" through the devil remembered. Where the bear lives, regardless of the species, it is the owner. The rest live nearby. There is a polar bear. I saw a whale or a walrus, the ice broke through and took out food. He ate himself, and behind him a bunch of foxes and white foxes fed. There is a brown bear salmon catching. Near a bunch of foxes and wolves. The bear spawn eats, and throws out the bodies of the fishes.

And bears do not know how to be afraid. They will go to the side so as not to interfere with someone else's hunt. But they will tear anyone who wants to stop their hunting ...



Guys in the West, you are stopping our hunting ...
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    April 11 2018 05: 43
    Any trainer will tell you ... The bear is the most dangerous wild animal ...
    1. +15
      April 11 2018 05: 57
      Remember Napoleon?
      Do you figure it out first, is it an emperor, a cake, or cognac? laughing
      A bear is a strong, intelligent and dominant beast. Was on our boat ....
      1. +8
        April 11 2018 06: 16
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        Is it an emperor, a cake, or a brandy?

        good Specific question laughing I wonder if you can have a cognac cake? In terms of etiquette ... In life, and so I know that you can laughing
        And we do not need emperors. Especially strangers. we do not understand the simple people of French lol
        1. 0
          April 11 2018 18: 57
          Quote: domokl
          A specific question. Interesting, but can you have a snack on cognac with a cake?

          pervert...
    2. +24
      April 11 2018 06: 01
      About trainers I will not say. But from the personal experience of meeting with the Boss I know, leave, if one is not hungry. But if the female with calves is really, there is no salvation. The scalp will remove better than the North American Indian. One paw ...
      No wonder the Siberian people after the extraction of the bear arrange a ritual. Forgiveness is asked.
    3. +3
      April 11 2018 07: 57
      Quote: Vard
      Any trainer will tell you ... The bear is the most dangerous wild animal ...

      Xs about trainers, but:
      According to the materials of zoologists, it is known that out of 44 cases of a tiger colliding with a brown bear, 50% of the cases resulted in the death of the bear, 27,3% - the death of a tiger and in 22,7% of the cases the animals dispersed. These data say that the tiger is stronger than a brown bear.
      Nevertheless, the tiger is a pure predator, imprisoned by evolution to kill. With a bear a little differently.
      1. BAI
        +10
        April 11 2018 09: 15
        On the territory of the Amur tiger (where a tiger and a bear can meet), a Himalayan bear lives - not a large one.
        The habitat of the Himalayan bear (white-breasted or black) is the Khabarovsk and Primorsky Territories, partially Amur Region.

        This species of bears, compared with their other species that live in the Far East, is not large. Adult males reach a length of 1,5-1,8 m with an average weight of 130-160 kg.

        But if the meeting had happened with
        The smallest individuals are found in Europe, the largest - in Alaska and Kamchatka - they weigh 500 kg or more; came across giants weighing 600-750 kg. The maximum recorded weight of the male Kamchatka bear was 600 kg, the average - 350-450 kg. The length of the European brown bear is usually 1,2-2 meters with a height at the withers of about 1 meter and a weight of 300 to 400 kg; for comparison: grizzlies are noticeably larger - some individuals, standing on their hind legs, reach a height of 2,8-3 meters; Bears living in central Russia weigh 400-600 kg. Adult males are on average 1,6 times larger than females.

        Amur tiger (the largest of the tigers)
        Height at the withers up to 115 cm, weight 170-250 kg, in some cases up to 300 kg or more.

        Therefore, for a tiger, a meeting with a European bear or grizzly bear no chance.
        I am already silent about the polar bear - so for the heap:
        Its length reaches 3 m, weight up to 1 t.
        1. +2
          April 11 2018 11: 36
          Quote: BAI
          On the territory of the Amur tiger (where a tiger and a bear can meet), a Himalayan bear lives - not a large one.

          good Here is the Ussuri tiger and crumpled the Himalayan bear. This is statistics. With brown this number will not work! hi
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +9
      April 11 2018 11: 24
      Quote: Vard Any trainer will tell you ... The bear is the most dangerous wild animal ...

      The bear is not the most dangerous beast in our forests! The bear is smart, so if you do not bring the situation to conflict, he will simply leave. And the most dangerous beast in our country is a wild boar, because without brains and without hesitation it will rush even with a careless look (I think the analogy with whom it can be associated is understandable). Any forester will confirm this to you!
      But if the bear is angry, then yes, it will be, without a doubt, the most dangerous beast!
      1. +1
        April 11 2018 11: 46
        A wild boar is definitely very dangerous. But not for the bear. If the bear walks through the woods, the boar will be quietly washed off the road.
        1. 0
          April 11 2018 19: 47
          It is good to do prey on cobans when they cross a river. Fishermen somehow sailed, there is no bream, nothing is there - a herd of cobans is swimming. Here they are there for the whole year, "caught" these fishermen are bad.
      2. +2
        April 11 2018 19: 40
        Like a rassamakh, still completely without a head, an animal, but the bears also began to attack, often. Wolves are also impudent. Foxes are already like mutts, the most arrogant creatures, but cute. Nature is changing, beasts are beasting. The same bears, if they have everything, and no one bothers them, they can intercede for the teddy bear, or when they master the territory - competitors are eliminated - and if he has everything, he will only take you out of curiosity. And they were pressed, and hunters and villages and oil and gas, neither a sigh nor a fart - and so they are beasts.
    6. +1
      April 11 2018 14: 06
      Quote: Vard
      Any trainer will tell you ... The bear is the most dangerous wild animal ...

      Yeah. And the smartest thing is the monkey ...)
      1. 0
        April 11 2018 19: 01
        completely crazy on the site? hit zoology? let's add: any bear in the taiga, ants eat up ... -what do you say? is it good to drive the blizzard about ANIMALS, or is the word "allegory" not familiar to many? laughing
        1. +2
          April 12 2018 01: 03
          Quote: Dead Day
          or is the word "allegory" not familiar to many?

          Well, if allegorically, then:
  2. +5
    April 11 2018 06: 15
    "Well, in vain the West decided to use the dumb from the smog of the British ..."
    I will argue with the author - it’s all the oatmeal to blame, it damaged the brain of the Angles.
    1. +5
      April 11 2018 11: 24
      Were there any English brains? The Irish wrote the literature to them, and the scientists are mostly of Scottish descent, including the great Newton.
    2. +6
      April 11 2018 12: 12
      Correctly. It was necessary to eat buckwheat. Our buckwheat produces immunity from poisoning. Because she did not take the Skripals.)
  3. +3
    April 11 2018 06: 39
    Emotionally, as always, and urya-patriotic, but you can read ... at least a day my worker did))))
  4. +12
    April 11 2018 06: 44
    I almost cried out of happiness when I read. The author write "escho", mine will at least rejoice at something .... Russia is about to give everyone ..... No, write "escho" .... crying
    1. +11
      April 11 2018 06: 59
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      just about ka-aaa to all will give ..

      Any doubts? Or are you more comfortable with the pose "on four"? So it does not roll with the Russians. We, too, like those bears have forgotten how to fear for a long time. At least those who are in HE now ...
      And the rest ... so in every nation there is a little shit
      1. +4
        April 11 2018 07: 21
        Quote: domokl
        so every nation has some shit

        Some have a lot more! laughing
        1. +6
          April 11 2018 07: 51
          So I recall the "Chinese 1001 warnings" (maybe someone else remembers) and how they wrote then: "do not disturb the" sleeping dragon "" ...... winked
          1. +4
            April 11 2018 10: 41
            And now China’s warnings are being implemented, huh? SGA feel them on themselves! The pogans have woken up striped, but now you don’t know what to do!
          2. +2
            April 11 2018 14: 18
            Quote: Monster_Fat
            So I recall the "Chinese 1001 warnings" (maybe someone else remembers) and how they wrote then: "do not disturb the" sleeping dragon "."

            Do you, generally speaking, know why such a saying came about? I doubt it - they would know if they had not used it so illiterate! China is not an aggressive country, it didn’t try to wage aggressive wars throughout its evolution, but China, like Russia, was regularly opened its mouth, so for centuries there has been a chronicle in China indicating the territories that have ever belonged to China and for any reason departed from him, as well as about all significant events. So, the proverb about the 1001 Chinese warning does not mean that China warns, but does nothing, but that in China they do not forget about anything that happened in its history! Agree, a significant difference in the sense, right? There will be a demand for everything and there will be a demand from everyone - this is the main topic of the saying.
            1. +1
              April 11 2018 17: 09
              Is China not an aggressive country? - It would be good. Only Uighurs and Kyrgyz people do not know about this. Would be very surprised. Han nationalism combined with Manchurian militancy give odds to yap by historical standards. It’s just that China has a different style of aggression — gradual crushing and unhurried digestion, without rushing anywhere. About "non-aggressiveness" I would send you to read about the wars between the Chinese peoples, at least in the era of the Five Kingdoms. It is now the Han Chinese have assimilated the whole of the Celestial Empire, but before that they were slaughtered be healthy. As a summary. there is a saying born from the Chinese internecine wars, "The Chinese do not take prisoners, much less their own." And yet, yes, Qin Shihuang, who buried people alive by the thousands, he is one of the most revered emperors among them.
              1. 0
                19 July 2018 11: 38
                Quote: andrew42
                Is China not an aggressive country? - It would be good. Only Uighurs and Kyrgyz people do not know about this. Would be very surprised.

                I come from Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata, to be precise. We have many Uyghurs and Kyrgyz who fled from China. I do not think you know more than them. Read not about what happened a long time ago - Japan also made pyramids from skulls, and now she kisses her enemy in the gums! And do not send me to read anything! I have been reading since childhood! hi
      2. +7
        April 11 2018 07: 48
        Quote: domokl
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        just about ka-aaa to all will give ..

        Any doubts? Or are you more comfortable with the pose "on four"? So it does not roll with the Russians. We, too, like those bears have forgotten how to fear for a long time. At least those who are in HE now ...
        And the rest ... so in every nation there is a little shit

        a bunch of angry comments, another concern at the UN and Urya - articles instead of an answer. And so year after year ...
      3. +6
        April 11 2018 08: 02
        Quote: domokl
        Any doubts?

        There is. No matter how great the backlog that remained from the Soviet Union, but 30 years of the new government cannot pass without a trace.
        1. +2
          April 11 2018 11: 32
          Quote: rkkasa 81
          Quote: domokl
          Any doubts?

          There is. No matter how great the backlog that remained from the Soviet Union, but 30 years of the new government cannot pass without a trace.

          Do not tell me ... What is the "hurt"? Your whole “hurt” was thoroughly pro-s-wound back in the 80s-90s! When really prosrali EVERYTHING! And factories, and the army, and brains, and respect, and everything else, and even conscience were exchanged for sausage ... And if after the Second World War percent of 80 of the European part of our country was destroyed, then after the 90s, the whole country was completely devastated. .. "Hurt" them ... You can shove yourself this "hurt" ...
          1. +2
            April 11 2018 12: 34
            In the 90s in the Sverdlovsk region all the enterprises remaining from the time of the USSR worked. Thanks to Putin’s stubborn economic reform, only the irreplaceable and few “giants” remained, the rest are now successfully dismantled and sold for scrap. And these are not always obsolete Soviet technologies. Specifically, VSMZ dismantled the latest Czech line for the production of welded pipes.
            1. +2
              April 11 2018 13: 44
              In your opinion, if Soviet, then obsolete? - just one example: Russian civilian nuclear technologies outperform American and French -
              you think hard, the technique is not your domain - a stamp has already worked out - this is how our friends of Semitic origin usually grumble
            2. +2
              April 11 2018 15: 55
              What, Putin came and went bankrupt? Or handed over in scrap metal? Nooo, without the leadership of local and labor collectives could not do! Did you yourself just watch or help?
    2. +1
      April 11 2018 12: 17
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      The author write "escho"

      As the Western comrades sober up and become aware of the realities, the author will illuminate this process and will give you “escho” and any other joy.
  5. +7
    April 11 2018 07: 03
    Mixed in a bunch of bears, cookies, ships. Something about nothing what
    1. +1
      April 11 2018 14: 10
      But the mood added !!!!!! wink
    2. +1
      April 11 2018 16: 36
      Quote: Nix1986
      Mixed in a bunch of bears, cookies, ships. Something about nothing what

      Yes, in principle, the general meaning of the article is clear and not completely new - “Let us throw our hats!” soldier
  6. +5
    April 11 2018 07: 14
    Here’s the thing in the pocket, whether our military will answer. This decision is made at the very top. And unlike our military, our politicians don’t have faith. Against the group of ships that the Yankees are pulling over the coast, the excess of 2 coastal batteries Bastion .4e launch vehicles, guidance and command vehicles. 8 missiles in a salvo for 1 battery. Enough to drown everyone and everything in the radius of destruction and it’s good to spoil an aircraft carrier.
    1. +2
      April 11 2018 07: 49
      Quote: shinobi
      Here’s the thing in the pocket, whether our military will answer. This decision is made at the very top. And unlike our military, our politicians don’t have faith. Against the group of ships that the Yankees are pulling over the coast, the excess of 2 coastal batteries Bastion .4e launch vehicles, guidance and command vehicles. 8 missiles in a salvo for 1 battery. Enough to drown everyone and everything in the radius of destruction and it’s good to spoil an aircraft carrier.

      keywords "in range"
  7. +4
    April 11 2018 07: 59
    Where the bear lives, regardless of species, he is the master. The rest live nearby.

    That's for sure, you don’t have to go into the bear’s territory, you’ll be more whole.
  8. +7
    April 11 2018 09: 00
    Lord Another quintessence of loyalty and pseudo-patriotism. There is no desire to even comment. The authors obviously don’t even understand what a disservice they are doing to Putin and his bear. laughing
    1. +4
      April 11 2018 09: 52
      laughing Interestingly, you are considering all the articles in terms of services or non-services? And if just humanly? Without regimes, power. political views. Are you ready to kneel? not Russia, not the state, but you personally? Let him kneel, but live?
      Personally, I have long understood the simple truth. All politics is a simple question, are you ours or bourgeois?
      1. +5
        April 11 2018 10: 02
        Weird question. Russia has been bourgeois for 25 years. And the concept of "knees" is very relative, for example, among pensioners ... or among the unemployed .... or those who have 12 or 22 million and they "did not fit" into the modern Russian "economy" ... .
        PS: Well, also "ours" sounds somehow .... "whose will you be? Whose serf, I ask? Our? Or bourgeois?" wink
      2. 0
        April 11 2018 14: 08
        Without politics, regimes, and power, even cats no longer breed. Rurik, who is he, a bourgeois or ours? Personally, the main thing for me is that the laws are respected and the power should be from the people and for him, and not for herself, but who will arrange the work of the 10th, even a Martian.
        1. 0
          April 11 2018 16: 11
          Quote: Nix1986
          that laws and authority be observed from the people and for them,

          laughing The oligarchs are the people, the working people, the peasant people, the homeless people, the intelligentsia, the people ... So what kind of people should power be? but it is possible to divide by political (Martian) views ...
          Power should be in the majority. The rest should not like it. But on the bill of laws to the point ...
          1. 0
            April 11 2018 16: 58
            Quote: domokl
            Quote: Nix1986
            that laws and authority be observed from the people and for them,

            laughing The oligarchs are the people, the working people, the peasant people, the homeless people, the intelligentsia, the people ... So what kind of people should power be? but it is possible to divide by political (Martian) views ...
            Power should be in the majority. The rest should not like it. But on the bill of laws to the point ...

            What majority are you talking about? Whom did Putin not pick up?
      3. +1
        April 11 2018 16: 56
        Are you ours or bourgeois?

        For starters, you and not you. Further, until this day I was my own, not yours or the bourgeois. Then, on your knees, you stand and beat the comprador’s authority with nods of similar articles.
        Alexander, and now humanly: I always lived and live with my head and not with television or the Internet, which I also wish for you. I always said that propagandists need to be intellectually 2 levels higher than those to whom propaganda is directed. I will not accept any stupid propaganda, be it the Kremlin or the State Department.
        1. 0
          April 11 2018 18: 21
          I wonder where do you get the information from? Or your level allows you to filter it? Propaganda-Dissemination and in-depth explanation of any. ideas, teachings, knowledge. (Wikipedia). So how about information without propaganda?
          1. 0
            April 11 2018 18: 38
            Alexander, I will tell you a secret, among thinking people the reference to Pedivikia is not comme il faut. A comme il faut, for example, TSB, which, an encyclopedia, gives us a deeper understanding of the word propaganda: Propaganda (lat. Propaganda - to be distributed, from propago - distribute)
            dissemination of political, philosophical, scientific, artistic and other views and ideas with the aim of introducing them into the public consciousness and activating mass practical activity. The main elements of the process of P.: its subject (social group whose interests are expressed by P.), content, forms and methods, means or channels of P. (radio, television, print, lecture system P., etc.), object ( audience or social communities to which P. is addressed). Decisive for understanding the process of P. are the social interests of its subject, their relationship with the interests of society as a whole and the individual groups that P. is addressed to. This determines its content and has a significant impact on the choice of forms, methods and means of P.
            In a narrower sense, P. denotes one of its types - political or ideological P. - the dissemination of views, ideas and theories with the aim of forming a certain worldview among the masses, ideas that reflect the interests of the subject of P., and stimulating the corresponding practical actions. The core of political politics is a certain class ideology. In the modern world, two opposing types of politics are distinguished: bourgeois and communist.
            Bourgeois scholars often deny P.'s conditionality by the nature of the ideology of the class and try to present it as a universal means of manipulating the mass consciousness in the interests of certain groups. Indeed, in an exploitative society, P. is used by the ruling class as a means of representing their group interest as a universal one, distorting the real situation in their own interests and imposing false ideas, theories, and biased information on the masses. These goals are served by the media of communication controlled by the monopoly bourgeoisie and the bourgeois state. However, misleading and manipulating the consciousness of the masses is by no means a universal property of P., but an expression of only the essence of bourgeois P., due to the antagonism of the classes of capitalist society, the contradiction between the fundamental interests of the imperialist bourgeoisie and the laws of modern social development.
            Now find the criteria for distinguishing just INFORMATION and ADVANCE. wink
  9. +1
    April 11 2018 09: 26
    Quote: aszzz888
    Where the bear lives, regardless of species, he is the master. The rest live nearby.

    That's for sure, you don’t have to go into the bear’s territory, you’ll be more whole.

    Here I am about the same. no need to poke a stick at a den.
  10. +4
    April 11 2018 10: 08
    Some pictures and cartoons with bears. Kindergarten for people from Matrix.ru.
    Another nonsense about the red line and do not wake the bear. The author lives by the standards of past centuries and wars.
    There will be no major conflict. And the capabilities of the RF Armed Forces in conventional weapons are limited to a maximum of two local conflicts. Next, only nuclear weapons.
    What bears are tigers and lions. With bare hands and sticks, nothing will be done. It seems that the author and those who write this have never seen tanks and planes.
    Did the author ever sit in a trench and have a tank on you? Yes, it is scary for an inexperienced person to stand next to him. I am sure that you would ... I'm sorry. Have you ever shot something with caliber that way 122 or more. Man is not a car. Fear does not depend on nationality. run only heels will sparkle.
    It's time to forget about this hatred. The war is already going on ... And unfortunately, the Russian Federation was probably in the most adverse situation when there is both an External enemy and an Internal enemy. Only of course this is not the fifth column. And the first one is neither.
  11. +2
    April 11 2018 11: 16
    I liked the article, I love these.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    April 11 2018 11: 45
    Keep it up.
  14. +2
    April 11 2018 12: 04
    While we back away and brush it off feel
  15. +5
    April 11 2018 12: 44
    Patriotic, highly artistic, but the meaning is not clear.
    It can be seen that the authors read Epperson.
    Well, a mandatory spit in the direction of the USSR. Is this really necessary for today's pseudo-patriots?
    I would like to recall that the most famous in the history of "Russians do not give up!" shouted a Kazakh in Stalingrad. And not Medvedev, not Gref, not Dvorkovich.
  16. +1
    April 11 2018 13: 31
    It is written beautifully !!! Neither give nor take !!!
  17. +1
    April 11 2018 14: 25
    Ah, thank you, dear authors! Life-affirming, fun and courageous! Many will not agree on trifles, many will generally say that hats are used again, and some are slowing down on discussions of habits and the strength of a bear, do not pay attention! You are great because when you can’t influence the situation, and this is exactly so, then you need to do exactly what you did! There were battles in which we lost, but there were no such wars, and only our government can defeat us, while saying that it is trying for us! hi drinks
  18. +4
    April 11 2018 18: 20
    good article, thanks to the authors!
  19. 0
    April 11 2018 19: 26
    The bear is playful and nervous like a cat. They need some reason to attack. Like that photographer - the bear failed. He took pictures of the bear, which did not pay attention to him, for years, and then he died. And in place of acc. a young bear came, and there is this horseradish photographer. For a bear, it’s all the same - a man, a bear - the roofing felts are occupied, seemingly not busy, there are some questions in the furry head - and then this photographer runs after him. And the bear got scared, began to run away from him, and he followed in his retreat - he no longer knows where to go, a frightened animal, lured this photographer into the bushes and beat him. The man completely did not understand the situation and died.
  20. 0
    April 12 2018 05: 43
    naive american guys decided to scare a bear with a can of condensed milk by the name of truman? in vain they are so spring, the bear is angry and hungry. and someone waving it with a wick, no, it turned out to be a brush of the tail of a toli of a dead lion, toli of a plucked rooster.
  21. 0
    April 15 2018 18: 26
    And themselves creaked? Also turned out to be Russian. After applying the most terrible Soviet gas, they decided not to die. All right, only daughter. Young after all. The body is strong. But after all, the former spy himself is in no hurry to take a place in the cemetery. He also decided to leave the hospital.

    I'm interested in . why do they write english spy everywhere? After all, in fact, he is a traitor to the homeland.
  22. 0
    April 15 2018 18: 43
    Quote: Vard
    Any trainer will tell you ... The bear is the most dangerous wild animal ...

    Yeah .. only touch him, he immediately kaaaak will begin to express concern. Well, another extreme concern - it finally can be, who didn’t hide, I’m not to blame