Skripal to bring Security Council. Russia requested a meeting of the UN Security Council

74
Russia requested a UN Security Council meeting on the Salisbury incident. A corresponding statement was made by the Russian permanent representative in the organization of Vasily Nebenzya.

Skripal to bring Security Council. Russia requested a meeting of the UN Security Council




Guided by the principle shared by us that the use of chemical weapons by anyone and anywhere is unacceptable and should be investigated and punished, and that impunity is unacceptable, and that the use of such weapons constitutes a threat of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. We, at the direction of our government, ask you to convene an open meeting of the Security Council in 15: 00 (22: 00 Moscow time) on the letter of the British Prime Minister Theresa May related to the Salisbury incident
- He said, referring to the chairman of the Security Council of the organization.

Earlier, Russia demanded that Britain present the facts of the Skrypal case at a meeting of the OPCW.

On Wednesday, the European Union refused to support the draft statement on the results of a special meeting of the OPCW, which was dedicated to the incident in Salisbury.
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    April 4 2018 19: 31
    What's the point? Nothing will change.
    The task of shaving is not to prove, but to create an impression. Like in a joke about stolen spoons. Spoons were found, but the sediment remained.
    1. +7
      April 4 2018 19: 37
      No, do not admit that there were spoons. Not for that they hid.
      1. +10
        April 4 2018 19: 42
        While we will deal with this violin in the UN, the Anglo-Saxons will think up something else ... In vain we follow their lead, they did just that.! Is the provocation by the Boeing brought down over Ukraine taught us nothing ..? Enough to justify oneself and try to prove something to this pack, which themselves are blood-deep, whole countries are destroying and robbing before everyone's eyes .. Oh Russia!
        1. +24
          April 4 2018 19: 55
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Enough to justify oneself and try to prove something to this pack, which themselves are blood-deep, whole countries are destroying and robbing before everyone's eyes .. Oh Russia!

          your suggestions? what do we do now? on the couch, on the keys, tap angry comments?
          1. +22
            April 4 2018 20: 22
            I suspect that we have every reason and confidence that we can take the Britons by the throat and accuse them of using chemical weapons. Here is such a perdimonocle. smile
            1. +10
              April 4 2018 20: 38
              Correctly said Y. Kedmi: We (Israel) are responding in such a way that we would no longer be disobedient. Good. You have to be hot. IMHO.
              1. +20
                April 4 2018 21: 20
                Quote: Landscaper
                Correctly said Y. Kedmi: We (Israel) are responding in such a way that we would no longer be disobedient. Good. You have to be hot. IMHO.

                God does not give horns to a vigorous cow. If Russia answers “so as not to be disgraceful,” some countries may cease to exist.
                Great power imposes great responsibility.
              2. Dam
                +1
                April 4 2018 21: 35
                I agree, there’s no need to run into a veto in the Security Council, here oxygen (gas) needs to be shut off
                1. +17
                  April 4 2018 22: 43
                  Quote: Damm
                  I agree, there’s no need to run into a veto in the Security Council, here oxygen (gas) needs to be shut off

                  This is the thing that always surprised me in our foreign policy. The US, and the West as a whole, have never been shy about linking politics with the economy. Moreover, no one really hides that politics is in the service of the economy. Remember - one of the conditions for granting loans to Yeltsin was what? That's right - cut the "Satan" into scrap metal. What is that Dog Sverdlovsk actively and engaged.
                  And our diplomats are like fifth-graders. They still believe in the prince on a white horse. You can’t play honestly with cheaters! What do you think - if the gas didn’t come from us to them, but on the contrary, would they block it to us the day before yesterday? Yes, it's easy ... And we have everything in the "flies separately - cutlets separately" play. Some "fulfill" agreements .... And if our "likely friends" spit on any agreement and violate any principle? Do we need to continue to build a virgin from ourselves?
                  1. +4
                    April 4 2018 23: 23
                    Moreover, no one really hides that politics is in the service of the economy.


                    Yes, as old as the world, "politics is a concentrated expression of the economy." But you propose the opposite - for the sake of politics, strain the economy. The US is trying to ensure that Russian gas is NOT sold, and you offer them help in this?
                    1. 0
                      April 5 2018 07: 44
                      Quote: dauria
                      so that Russian gas is NOT sold, and you offer them help in this?

                      The economy should not live as a single gas. China alone has more in the export of children's toys. wink
              3. 0
                April 5 2018 07: 01
                And where is the result? Does Israel live in peace and good neighborliness with Arab countries? It is not the performers who need to answer harshly, they will always be found for the next provocation, such a “good” in the world as dirt. It is necessary that customers become discouraged.
            2. 0
              April 5 2018 08: 07
              Quote: Hire
              I suspect that we have every reason and confidence that we can take the Britons by the throat and accuse them of using chemical weapons. Here is such a perdimonocle. smile

              There is strength, there is will, but there is no willpower ... something is interfering under their supervision!
          2. +4
            April 4 2018 20: 26
            Quote: LSA57
            your suggestions? what do we do now? on the couch, on the keys, tap angry comments?

            I wrote like, do not pay attention to all their attacks and provocations .. Poor and calm down! No evidence, the whole conversation is over.
            1. +4
              April 4 2018 21: 01
              how not to pay it ?! And dunk ......
            2. +5
              April 5 2018 03: 45
              Quote: MIKHAN
              I wrote like, do not pay attention to all their attacks and provocations .. Poor and calm down! No evidence, the whole conversation is over.

              noooooo .... in this case, worthless shavers must be fully pulled on a bump !!! laughing laughing good good good it was painful that they feared and felt impunity for Iraq ... Russia is not Iraq ... such things will not crawl here .... and rightly, they are dropped with feeling, plainly, and with arrangement in front of the eyes of the whole world !!! wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing good good let's see how the process goes further ... the ideal option would be to fly away the struggle with the old woman with the vile British political arena ... then we don’t need an apology from them !!! lol lol lol
          3. +6
            April 4 2018 20: 28
            I myself was a supporter of tough measures against Britons right away, but I admit that the smearing of shit (layer by layer) of the British authorities brings me more pleasure. We won this battle, although the Britons are not recognized, but we all understood and understood that the false allies were worthless, and how strong Russia was. Those. according to their logic, the nerd gave the gopnik, but the gopnik did not understand why ...
            1. +5
              April 4 2018 22: 40
              Quote: Kent0001
              We won this fight, although the Britons are not recognized.

              What a sorry fight? Where? I wrote and will write again, even if the British cannot prove anything, people all over the world will still be sure that this is the work of Russia. The entire information field is in their hands. A concrete example is the “Malaysian Boeing”, in the four years of the commission’s “work” there is no evidence, but 98% of the inhabitants in the West are firmly convinced that the Russians “shot down” it.
              1. +2
                April 5 2018 05: 25
                Dear, you do not speak for the whole of Russia, please. Russia has no arms and legs to say about her that she did something. People live in Russia, a people who have long been tired of the machinations of the British and various other Swedes, as well as the media, which, considered Russian, cover all events from the British and American point of view.
                1. 0
                  April 5 2018 13: 16
                  Quote: 1536
                  Dear, you do not speak for all of Russia

                  Are you sorry about this? The conversation is generally about the actions of the British authorities, in simplification, of England itself. What does the British and everyone else in the West care about people living in Russia? Russia does not have arms and legs, maybe your head then? Or according to your people separately, and Russia separately? Or are the actions of the authorities separated from the image of the state (not only in Russia)? What is your comment at all? And I realized oil is oil.
                  1. 0
                    April 5 2018 13: 50
                    It's me that enough to persuade Russia to a place and out of place: "Russia is that," "Russia is that." Russia is the country in which the people live, and the Russian Federation is the state that this people created. Therefore, there is always someone specific who is responsible for this or that matter. Yes, I believe that some actions of the state are not consistent with each other, possibly contradictory. Much today depends on the Government, and not only on the President or the people, and there are just problems here, for example, with the same coverage of international events in the media (say so yourself), proactive work. Even the British do not talk about "Russia", but mean specific people and institutions of the state. They hit not in areas, but in aiming. And we are all "Russia", "Russia". What is Russia? Where are you yourself? We eat all the oil in the morning, do we spend days after days?
                    1. 0
                      April 5 2018 14: 10
                      Quote: 1536
                      Even the British do not talk about "Russia", but mean specific people and institutions of the state.

                      Something new lol Or do you mean Johnson’s “statement” that the point is not in the Russians but in Russia itself? Somehow you have everything in a heap and "flies" and "cutlets". For Russian citizens it matters where the people are in Russia, where the government is, and where the president is and who exactly should do what. For Western propaganda, this is absolutely the same. From their point of view, there is an “evil” Russia, which means there are “evil” Russians and, accordingly, “villain” Putin and the government, respectively.
                      Quote: 1536
                      They hit not squares, but aiming.

                      It is on the areas, and specifically just pouring dirt. And not aiming, but to the whole of Russia, along with all its components, which you are so diligently trying to share.
                      1. 0
                        April 5 2018 14: 32
                        "Evil Russia"? Hm. This is something new. Have you come up with, or based on what you read? This is your mistake. The British are aiming so hard that you don’t even notice where, and then suddenly it begins to seem to you that “all of Russia” is evil, and, sorry, all its “components” are already splattered with British dirt. This is far from the case. The calculation is based on the fact that the cornerstones, on which the state relies, can indeed suddenly be shaken, they are splattered with British dirt so that it will be difficult to wash. The devil is in the details and B. Johnson is not as simple as it seems. I mean that it is necessary to protect that and those whom the British attacked, building a defense in each specific direction. Protect specifically. By the way, the aforementioned Briton made a reservation that he did not fight the Russian people. Then with whom? And many understood this in a way that was a showdown between governments and those in power, and we don’t care. Not all the same. In general, dear, we are talking about the same thing, but in different ways. The discussion is about nothing.
        2. +4
          April 4 2018 20: 03
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Enough to justify yourself and try to prove something to this pack

          Vitaly, what are your specific suggestions? Or did you join the “sect” to “slink as much as you can?” Who call from their combat sofas — is it time to strike at all NATO capitals with “Topol”, “Caliber” and “Iskander”, preferably with a vigorous BG? winked
          1. +1
            April 4 2018 20: 35
            Quote: Piramidon
            Which call from their combat sofas - is it time to strike at all NATO capitals with Topol, Caliber and Iskander, preferably with a vigorous BG?

            and go in the front row yourself
          2. Dam
            +2
            April 4 2018 21: 37
            Although not Vitaly, I think that with brazen relations it is necessary to break off diplomatic relations and, on this basis, cut off the gas supply to them. Need to drive a wedge between them and Europe
          3. 0
            April 5 2018 08: 16
            Quote: Piramidon
            Quote: MIKHAN
            Enough to justify yourself and try to prove something to this pack

            Vitaly, what are your specific suggestions? Or did you join the “sect” to “slink as much as you can?” Who call from their combat sofas — is it time to strike at all NATO capitals with “Topol”, “Caliber” and “Iskander”, preferably with a vigorous BG? winked

            The main thing I did - I voted for whom I wanted and chose whom I needed. Now you can safely fight from the couch, another is not required.
          4. 0
            April 5 2018 17: 02
            I want myself this =)
    2. +6
      April 4 2018 19: 42
      The United Nations is ruled by the same impotence as in the League of Nations. Nothing will change. Only rolls will crumple indefinitely.
    3. +15
      April 4 2018 19: 44
      Quote: adma
      Spoons were found, but the sediment remained.

      The point is not in the "spoons", but in escalating pressure on Britain and its so-called. rulers. Now the shavers will try to release the story on the brakes. Type: the investigation is classified and the verdict is not subject to discussion. This can never be allowed!
      1. +10
        April 4 2018 20: 02
        Quote: Kurare
        The point is not in the "spoons", but in escalating pressure on Britain and its so-called. rulers

        Well, this is how to say .., It’s unforgettable that it is Boris Johnson who owns the pearl with the “dead cat” on the table. In his writings, in the case of difficulties with partners, he suggests “throwing a dead cat on the table” in order to turn everyone's attention to an unusable object, and at this time he should do his dirty tricks. So the idea of ​​throwing the Skripal case on the European table may belong to him personally, and for the sake of understanding it is clear to whom. hi
        1. +10
          April 4 2018 20: 53
          hi Greetings!
          Who owns this "idea" is probably not important in itself. It is important to understand (and this was understood) who profits from this. Russia may lose the battle, but here is the "war" - we must win! Both Lavrov and Putin have already proved that they have more than one marathon to have enough breaths. But B. Johnson will be able to run for so long, I'm not sure.
          Throwing a cat on the table is a momentary phenomenon, surprise and shock pass quickly. But to whom this cat will have to gobble up after this, and with all the giblets - we’ll see this! wink
          1. +6
            April 4 2018 21: 03
            Quote: Kurare
            Russia may lose the battle, but here is the "war" - we must win!

            I agree! good !
            Quote: Kurare
            this is a momentary phenomenon and shock passes quickly

            Not everyone, these people didn’t have it: Slovakia, Slovenia, Portugal, Malta, Luxembourg, Cyprus, Ireland, Greece, Bulgaria, Austria. Judging by the reaction of the rest, the smell of a dead cat impresses them hi
            Quote: Kurare
            But who will have to eat this cat
            Well, gourmet names such as: Karl12, Napoleon, Hitler ... etc. etc. , the only question is who are the next from the list of many candidates Yes
            1. +7
              April 4 2018 21: 17
              Slovakia and Slovenia - I'm shocked myself! I don’t understand why they didn’t fall under Britons.
              Portugal and Greece - they already have enough of their problems and tickle the heels of the bear - this may not be pleasant to the bear.
              Malta, Cyprus and Luxembourg - there is no one to expel.
              Ireland - these just want to annoy the Britons. After the battle of the British hooligans by Russian fans, with the almost 5-fold succession of the Britons in the European Championship, they even composed a song about it and supported them as soon as they could.
              Bulgaria is the current EU chairman. And the former general drank enough NATOV truth.
              But Austria is the most interesting. Young and very ambitious Chancellor Kurtz, who has nothing to hook on at all. Moreover, the Austrians are not in NATO.
              So everyone has their own story. And you're right, not everyone likes the look of a dead animal on a table ... hi
    4. +8
      April 4 2018 19: 46
      The Security Council, as usual, will listen to our arguments, and then they will routinely call Russia an aggressor, a threat to world stability and some of their “values,” even if our arguments are confirmed by iron facts.
      1. +1
        April 4 2018 19: 57
        Quote: DMB_95
        and then habitually call Russia the aggressor

        no longer called. see how many countries in the world no longer believe in small-shaved. and Kitak openly accuses of falsification
      2. +6
        April 4 2018 23: 16
        Quote: DMB_95
        The Security Council, as usual, will listen to our arguments, and then they will routinely call Russia an aggressor, a threat to world stability and some of their “values,” even if our arguments are confirmed by iron facts.


        The whole situation in the Security Council should not be seen as the “Skripal affair”, but as the “Theresa May” affair - an aggressive slander against another country at the level of senior civil servants. And she should set an ultimatum - if there is no evidence within 24 hours, then either resign kindly, or break off diplomatic relations. And then to name her only as a liar prime minister.
    5. +1
      April 4 2018 19: 46
      Quote: adma
      Nothing will change.

      A veto will be issued, on a pretext. And the "shoals" of shaves will rush to cover dozens of paid (or taken for Faberge) singing along! And the customer of the carnival will only be smiling!
      1. +1
        April 4 2018 20: 10
        Quote: Tol100v
        And the "shoals" of shaves will rush to cover dozens of paid (or taken for Faberge) singing along!

        They are called now not “singers”, but “EXPERTS”. wink hi
      2. +6
        April 4 2018 21: 27
        Quote: Tol100v
        Quote: adma
        Nothing will change.
        A veto will be issued, on a pretext. And the "shoals" of shaves will rush to cover dozens of paid (or taken for Faberge) singing along! And the customer of the carnival will only be smiling!

        Be that as it may, the Britons will no longer vehemently insist on Russia's guilt. Now sluggishly snapping and referring to secrecy, they will try to cover up the investigation in the hope that someday they will forget about him and the thing will come down on the brakes. So let Vasily Nebenzya, every day, like "good morning" weighed the British side a conditional kick with the question - What about Skripal?
    6. +3
      April 4 2018 20: 01
      Quote: adma
      The task of shaving is not to prove, but to create an impression. Like in a joke about stolen spoons. Spoons were found, but the sediment remained.

      Sediment will definitely remain, but only who has more and what? Is that a question?
      The world without idiots is impressed and will appreciate everything correctly.
  2. +7
    April 4 2018 19: 33
    A futile lesson .. No, of course Sofronkov can be released to build everyone there .. Or illegally Volfovich, .. "Launch Berlag" laughing
    1. +3
      April 4 2018 19: 36
      Give him a landing boot .. Let him knock ... For not fig ...
      1. +10
        April 4 2018 19: 41
        Work out all possible political platforms.
    2. +4
      April 4 2018 19: 43
      210ox (Dmitriy) hi .
      No, of course you can release Sofronkov to build everyone there .. Or illegally Volfovich,
      And it’s possible both of them. It would be the norm. And in general, declare that we will send more of their diplomats for lies. Press. And the Americans for one 60 goals. Only without permission to replace.
    3. +4
      April 4 2018 19: 49
      Quote: 210ox
      A futile lesson .. No, of course Sofronkov can be released to build everyone there ..

      Moreover, this can be a negative for us. The Britons will say that Russia is obstructing the investigation. And in general, the statements of our officials mean the following: you have no evidence. But it must be stated that we did not do this and are ready to present any evidence. At the same time insisting on an objective investigation. And constantly in the form of notes, memoranda, statements to convey to all our official position. And it turns out that the version with buckwheat - and not only - is voiced in Britain, ours are picked up, mocked at it, and in Europe, including in Britain, this version is already voiced, as it came from Russia, and from official sources . And the Western media say that Russia is lying, inventing implausible versions. Although Russia had nothing to do with this. Something similar happened with the Boeing. Once again, we are not ready for the methods of informational and psychological warfare. hi
    4. +7
      April 4 2018 20: 13
      Do not slam the doors and stupidly be silent, because it will only get worse. You need to constantly and tirelessly poke and poke them into their own lies. Catch them on contradictions, ask uncomfortable questions, bring them to a white heat. In order not to work out as with our athletes at the Olympics. Now diplomats have a lot of work to do. Let them practice it!
    5. +9
      April 4 2018 20: 19
      Quote: 210ox
      Launch the Berlag "

      good Will be done soldier
      1. +5
        April 4 2018 21: 20
        Of course, it will get fierce if Big Ben's kitchen stands.
  3. +6
    April 4 2018 19: 39
    promising or not, and people should understand that you don’t need to rush words just like that. You need to disturb, pull them, make them invent, evade, this is part of the geopolitical game.
    1. +1
      April 4 2018 19: 56
      for some reason, I immediately remembered the scene of the bidding of Father Fyodor with a brainworker, engineer Bruns. (Pugovkin, Etush) from the "12 chairs". It’s the same way that there would be no time to drink a seagull with milk.
      God forbid me from any analogies and comparisons.
  4. +7
    April 4 2018 19: 41
    The wait is over. It's time to strike back. Now the British need to answer for slander. Harnessed for a month, it's time to ride on the arrogant faces.
  5. +14
    April 4 2018 19: 42
    Russia is doing everything right by convening the UN Security Council in the Skripal case. You need to finish shaving while their lies are awake. Strike while the iron is hot. Everything is extremely logical. good
  6. +2
    April 4 2018 19: 42
    Here's the latest news: German chemist Ralf Trapp told the DPA that the poison used could only be made in state laboratories. This is either the USSR (Russia), or Czechoslovakia (Czech Republic), or Iran, or (attention!) Porton Down (Britain). With great anticipation, I am waiting for the statement of the Czech Foreign Ministry on the expulsion of German diplomats from the country laughing
  7. +5
    April 4 2018 19: 44
    From the unwritten Kanan Doyle.

    Holmes, today's Times writes about Skripal poisoning.
    What do you think of it?

    Watson, Teresa May even misinterpreted you ...
    1. +2
      April 4 2018 20: 10
      “By the way, Watson, doesn't it smell like oatmeal?”
      - For Mrs. Hudson, relatives sent from Salisbury buckwheat brand "Novicek"
  8. +1
    April 4 2018 20: 12
    About Nord fishermen, do not forget to put in a good word while you all sit together!
  9. +2
    April 4 2018 20: 13
    The main thing is not to be silent, not to be patient! Crush Anglicos, twist balls to them! Behave wisely, but moderately brazenly! And flock our lawyers there with herds, do not defend the honor of the country!
    1. +2
      April 4 2018 20: 58
      I agree, Herculesych. hi So far, we, as a whole, are competently fighting off the information attacks, and in some places we are going over to the counteroffensive (questions of the OPCW, UN ...). But it’s not worth it to go far into their defense, the enemy is very strong and there are many of them. "Fighting" as we can.
  10. 0
    April 4 2018 20: 20
    Collects correctly! It is also necessary, according to the article, to every tabloid from the Russian ambassadors in those countries where they raised the biggest hype, about the fact of convocation, and then also a full report on the conduct, like what was on the council itself. and on all online media platforms. The so-called counterattack along the entire front line, as near Kursk - the enemy’s attack was sustained, exhausted and shot! And let the arrogant Saxons sweat, inventing new ways.
  11. +1
    April 4 2018 20: 23
    We need to make more noise that the Britons are going to swindle EU members with Brexitis. On the grandmother, of course. And this version should fly out of every iron.
  12. 0
    April 4 2018 20: 47
    online now

  13. +2
    April 4 2018 20: 49
    On Monday, 5 March, the earliest morning, at dawn, assistants reported to British Prime Minister Teresa May: Russian President Vladimir Putin asked to urgently connect him with the head of the British government - for a conversation that does not tolerate any delay.

    “Mrs. May,” Putin said. “We received a message that a potent poison was used on your territory, in the city of Salisbury. Perhaps a combat chemical agent. People, Russian citizens and British nationals are poisoned. Otherwise, the attack was I can’t name the incident - I was a former colonel of our military intelligence, convicted of treason. I understand perfectly well that this is why, and also for many objective and subjective reasons, suspicion will inevitably fall on Russia, on our special services. So, I I’ll categorically assure you and your government, as well as the population of Great Britain, that the Russian state has nothing to do with this heinous, monstrous crime. On behalf of Russia, I declare our full solidarity with Britain in this difficult moment. I would like to express my sincere sympathy to the victims and their loved ones. I also have to declare the deepest indignation at the actions of inveterate villains who have committed disgusting provocation with the sole purpose of embroiling our states and peoples, provoking the hardest international crisis. We must not allow this to happen. For our part, we are ready to do everything we can to help investigate this criminal act, to find and bring to justice the perpetrators. In particular, we are ready to provide your experts with the most free access to our secret chemical laboratories and to our specialists in this field. It will be possible to use together the equipment and accumulated information there for the prompt identification of a poisonous substance and thereby get on the trail of criminals as soon as possible. And here's what I still want to tell you confidentially, not for printing: I do not believe that some kind of out of control officers of our special services could have committed this atrocity. But just in case, I have already ordered to conduct a thorough professional inspection in order to completely eliminate this possibility ... "

    Of course, there was no such call. But if it took place, the situation could now be completely different ... hi
    1. +7
      April 4 2018 21: 02
      You have an aberration of vision - you measure Russia with Israeli arshin laughing

      Britain is a small country on the periphery of Europe with scanty industry and armed forces, nuclear weapons assigned to the United States, an external conflict with the EU and an internal one with Scotland and Northern Ireland. The only source of income for Britain is interest on bank deposits of Russians and Arabs.

      Therefore, the pot-bellied trifle will be interrupted without a call from Moscow - apparently, Teresa herself will seek a conversation with the GDP (if Moscow will be picked up at all) for a humiliated apology.
  14. +1
    April 4 2018 21: 29
    Dear, do not you think that all this is a setup? That we are hanging this noose around our neck? Well, are our enemies so much so that their own chemists have surrendered? Here Artyom wrote well: https://artemdragunov.livejournal.com/5477277.htm


    "Many people think that the Crown is not so stupid as to go for a simple forgery.
    And they ask the question - how is it with the Skripal case? No evidence, etc. and suddenly hit a nuclear power?
    The fact of the matter is that the Crown is not stupid to climb into shit without having a bitch ....
    I will explain, since no one knows the Crown better than me :))) It's my hobby to study it from the inside :)))
    That is, she will easily go to the forgery :))))) And two and three. There is no problem for the Crown in a forgery or a simple lie.
    But if there is support. Reinforced.
    The crown never works without support or without a basis of evidence, albeit fake, but a whole bunch that cannot be physically refuted.
    Remember what happened to Rodchenkov? You can lie about doping for the seventy times, but if the chief of the country's anti-doping testified, that's all. . Do not argue - everything is useless. This technique is called IRON ARGMENT.
    As in the case of Gordievsky or Kalugin.
    It is the IRON ARGMENT in the Skripal case that allows the Crown to put pressure on Russia.
    And this is a very senior witness.
    The crown is sure that if the case comes to a serious level, then she can merge it and then the world will be forced to admit that she is right, even if everything is fake.
    She has a joker in her hands and can be felt.
    Do you understand?
    It’s as if the Crown had witnessed Deputy Shoigu or Bortnikov, or some deputy prime minister, especially in charge of security.
    Medne?
    And apparently - such a witness and already merged info the Crown ALREADY has. There is a large drain and large people. And he testified against Russia.
    And now it doesn’t matter - fake or not, double agent or not. Sham or not.
    The testimony of such witnesses is nothing to interrupt.
    Look for a rat, not traces of poison ..... "
    1. +4
      April 4 2018 21: 59
      That we are hanging this noose around our neck?


      A resolution on an international investigation into the Skripal case is being submitted to the Security Council. Of course, with the participation of Russia.
      If the UK takes advantage of the veto, then it will become clear to everyone where the ears stick out.
    2. +2
      April 4 2018 22: 15
      The testimony of such witnesses is nothing to interrupt.
      Judge: witness, your evidence.
      Witness: here is a cross for you, I give a tooth.
      Judge: convincingly.
      Z.Y. No evidence, no witnesses are needed there - there are other more compelling arguments: the situation in Syria, the Nefteyuan, the Russian strategic nuclear forces and hypersonic missiles, the national interests of other states (who dream of getting rid of the Anglo-Saxon dictate). The UN and other international platforms are just an addition; we are fighting there, we can say, positional information battles.
  15. +2
    April 4 2018 22: 28
    The right actions. Stop making excuses, look for inconsistencies and logical deadlocks in a stream of unproven charges.
    Demand an explanation on which basis they allow themselves to such behavior?
    Zakharova speaks enough Russian to publicly whip overwhelmed clowns from Downing Street. And you can begin to turn towards red gingerbread simply: "Yes you, old man, boor."
  16. 0
    April 5 2018 00: 09
    It is naive to believe and wait, to call for international law ... Now, the clown and clowness will run and present "evidence", dreaming!
  17. 0
    April 5 2018 00: 15
    Quote: Operator


    Britain is a small country on the periphery of Europe with scanty industry and armed forces, nuclear weapons assigned to the United States, an external conflict with the EU and an internal one with Scotland and Northern Ireland.
    The only source of income for Britain is interest on bank deposits of Russians and Arabs.
    .

    You can’t write such nonsense during the Internet, Great Britain is one of the richest countries in the world
    UK GDP - 5th in the world,
    Russia is 12th place (2 times less than in the UK).
    The volume of exports of English cars ranks third in the world, one of the three leading suppliers of electronics and communications.
    1. +1
      April 5 2018 00: 24
      Quote: alta
      Quote: Operator


      Britain is a small country on the periphery of Europe with scanty industry and armed forces, nuclear weapons assigned to the United States, an external conflict with the EU and an internal one with Scotland and Northern Ireland.
      The only source of income for Britain is interest on bank deposits of Russians and Arabs.
      .

      You can’t write such nonsense during the Internet, Great Britain is one of the richest countries in the world
      UK GDP - 5th in the world,
      Russia is 12th place (2 times less than in the UK).
      The volume of exports of English cars ranks third in the world, one of the three leading suppliers of electronics and communications.
      Export volume .... everything is strewn with Chinese, fairy tales for schoolchildren ... Yes
      UK GDP - 5th place in the world .... on paper, paper can stand it ....
      You can not completely trust the Internet ... wassat
    2. +1
      April 5 2018 00: 34
      Quote: alta
      Quote: Operator


      Britain is a small country on the periphery of Europe with scanty industry and armed forces, nuclear weapons assigned to the United States, an external conflict with the EU and an internal one with Scotland and Northern Ireland.
      The only source of income for Britain is interest on bank deposits of Russians and Arabs.
      .

      You can’t write such nonsense during the Internet, Great Britain is one of the richest countries in the world
      UK GDP - 5th in the world,
      Russia is 12th place (2 times less than in the UK).
      The volume of exports of English cars ranks third in the world, one of the three leading suppliers of electronics and communications.
      All he correctly "operator" indicated ....
      Top 5 largest banks in the world ....
      1. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China) The bank is the largest in the world. The value of its assets is $ 3,62 trillion. The bank is also the fourth in the world in terms of revenue - $ 134,8 billion.

      2. China Construction Bank Corp. The value of the assets of the second largest bank in the world is $ 2,94 trillion. The Bank has 13 branches domestically, as well as branches in New York, Seoul, Singapore, Tokyo, Melbourne, Sydney, Barcelona, ​​Frankfurt, Luxembourg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg and Auckland.

      3. Agricultural Bank of China (Agricultural Bank of China) Another Chinese bank in the ranking. The value of the assets is $ 2,82 trillion. The company has 320 million retail customers, 2,7 million corporate customers and nearly 24 branches.

      4. Bank of China (Bank of China) The value of the company's assets is $ 2,63 trillion. The bank was founded in 1912 and is the oldest bank in mainland China.

      5. HSBC Holdings. This is the largest bank. UK, the value of its assets is estimated at $ 2,57 trillion. The British bank has offices in 80 countries and throughout the UK.
  18. 0
    April 5 2018 02: 13
    The essence of the noise: bent over an unnecessary dude. A noise above the roof! NATO is bombing states, a lot of people are dying, and so what? But nothing. The war in Ukraine? Nothing too. And here is one rotten type. But Ukraine captured the ship from the Crimea and the captain in the hospital! Here is a reason for noise!
  19. 0
    April 5 2018 10: 49
    The bonds of Skrepal initially look like the brotherhood of Judah Iscariot. So, the aspen female in historical perspective, looks quite a real brace for this gang.