Military Review

They teared Russian temechko. How large Russian media relate to the motherland

77
Quality journalism and prejudice towards one’s own country are incompatible and mutually exclusive.


They teared Russian temechko. How large Russian media relate to the motherland


If the so-called world press, represented by major Western news agencies, newspapers and television channels, has long been trained to play the same propaganda dude, and therefore there is no need to even look for a hint of fundamental differences on key issues of world politics, then this is the case with the Russian press somewhat different.

Thanks to the longstanding and persistent promotion of state interests and public priorities by Vladimir Putin and his entourage, there is a certain part of the media, which, despite the dominance of the liberal paradigm imprinted in the mass journalistic consciousness, still does not go too far in demonstrating its separation from the Russian state. But there is another, no less noticeable, in any case, more vociferous part.

“Who is xy” in the world of the Russian top press can be fairly confidently judged by the style of presentation news materials. And for the convenience of carrying out such a test, it is best to take one sensational topic and see how it is reflected in the mirror of certain publications. And in this way, find out the degree of curvature of this mirror.

Just these days, the news came up, which allows us to quite clearly answer the question we are interested in. Almost all the leading Russian media did not pass by reports that Israeli F-35A fighters allegedly passed through Syrian airspace by undetected Russian air defense systems. From which itself a conclusion follows about the fatal technical backwardness of Russian radar systems and the unsurpassed combat qualities of the aforementioned American aircraft.

Before assessing the nature of the reaction of the press to this "sensation", it is necessary to clarify the source of its origin. Which, frankly, does not inspire any confidence. This is how this source characterizes, for example, an online publication. "Sight":

“Aljarida was previously repeatedly accused of publishing information about certain operations of the Israeli army, which are not subsequently confirmed. The portal has already been suspected of cooperating with the Israeli authorities. ”


It is obvious that other publications also had similar information regarding the degree of “authenticity” of this source. But, as you will soon see, this did not bother everyone.

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has already given its assessment of this informational stuffing, which, as one would expect, turned out to be unequivocally negative.

“Information published in a number of media with reference to a foreign source, that“ Israeli fighters deceived Russian radars in Syria and conducted reconnaissance at high altitude ”is complete nonsense,” the department said. According to the source, any aircraft at high altitude becomes easily detectable and vulnerable to air defense systems of most countries. Since the time of the downed US-2 over the territory of the Soviet Union, no one has been trying at high altitude to violate foreign airspace. ”


You do not need to be a great military expert to realize a simple thing: some wild-growing foreign publication cannot know anything about what only the calculations of the Russian air defense radars in Syria can know - they saw someone on their screens, or not.

And now, taking into account this circumstance, let us move on to the main issue on the agenda. More precisely, how some of the top Russian media’s “sensation” reacted to this clearly suspicious (even before the Ministry of Defense refuted) “Let us give the titles of their publications on this topic, taken from the news search engine Yandex.ru. Which by themselves are quite eloquent and leave no doubt as to which of them still “filters the market” and is in no hurry to throw stones at the Russian garden, and who, strictly opposite, takes advantage of any, even the most dubious possibility. So let's get started:

RBC
PM21:38
Media learned about intelligence aviation Israel in Iran bypassing Russian radars

IslamNews
PM21:18
Israeli aircraft made reconnaissance flights over Iran

TVNZ
PM21:06
Two Israeli fighter jets conducted reconnaissance operations in Iranian airspace

Rambler
PM20:35
Russian radar did not notice Israeli fighters

Rossiyskaya Gazeta
PM20:29
Two Israeli fighters conducted reconnaissance in the skies of Iran

NTV
PM20:11
Media: Israeli F-35 appeared in the sky of Iran

REGNUM
PM19:55
Media: Israeli Air Force conducted a reconnaissance mission in Iran

BBC News
PM19:47
Israeli aviation conducted reconnaissance in Iran bypassing radar from the Russian Federation

REN TV
PM19:45
Two Israeli fighter jets conducted reconnaissance over Syria and Iran

Folk news
PM19:32
Israeli fighters conduct reconnaissance over Iran - media

Lenta.ru
PM18:34
Israeli fighters deceived Russian radars in Syria

IA "News"
PM18:20
Media: Russian air defense did not notice the passage of the Israeli Air Force over Iran

Ruposters.ru
PM18:17
Israeli aircraft fly over Russian radars unnoticed

Caucasus Herald
PM17:52
Israeli F-35 conducted a reconnaissance operation in Iran

Moscow Komsomol
PM17:47
Israeli aircraft flew over Iran, bypassing Russian radars in Syria

Vzglad.ru
PM17:38
Media: Russian radar did not notice the Israeli F-35

TASS
PM17:36
Two Israeli fighters conducted a reconnaissance operation in Iran

Interfax
PM16:52
The media reported on the reconnaissance of Israeli aircraft in Iran, bypassing the Russian radar


Let's summarize. Of the eighteen top media outlets in the Russian Federation presented above, nine, that is exactly half, refused to use in their headlines a clearly unprovoked propaganda against Russia and, moreover, unverified version of the blind radar of Russian air defense. The rest, with varying degrees of rage and mockery at the address of the Russian Federation, carried this fake into the hats of their news. Personally, I was particularly struck by the following versions: the frankly mischievous headline of Lenta.ru (“Israeli fighters deceived Russian radars in Syria”), simulating the neutral objectivity of RBC’s product (“the media learned about Israeli aviation reconnaissance in Iran bypassing Russian radars”) and peremptory , in the spirit of the worst traditions of the agitprop, the version of "Look": ("The media:" Russian radars were not noticed by the Israeli F-35 ").

We will not over-generalize and draw too far-reaching conclusions. But in this particular case, we state that exactly half of the leading Russian editions noted in the tops of this topic came forward with positions (far from being patriotic) openly biased towards Russia and its armed forces. Moreover, this was done in spite of generally accepted standards, not even of high-quality, but simply conscientious journalism, which implies at least minimal verification of information from a clearly dubious source.

If not even half, but at least one-third of the mainstream press of the United States, approached with a similar measure of bias and hostility towards their country, America’s song would have been sung long ago. Russia, of course, is not so weak, but its safety margin is not infinite. Especially if it will continue to continue to hammer at a temechko dashing distributors of fried fakes.
Author:
77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Grandfather
    Grandfather April 1 2018 06: 32
    +15
    it seems, only from the "press", only RT for Russia ..
    1. 210ox
      210ox April 1 2018 06: 53
      +3
      Well, why. You talk about the mass media and not just about the press .. And Solovyov, there are plenty of people who are abroad, mother .. That's just among them and fools who are ready to break their foreheads.
      Quote: Dead Day
      it seems, only from the "press", only RT for Russia ..
    2. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 April 1 2018 07: 27
      +5
      It is necessary to punish these scammers up to criminal liability.
      1. Mestny
        Mestny April 1 2018 10: 54
        +13
        Here it is worth turning to the experience of the West.
        They do not punish anyone for just what was said - freedom of speech.
        But suddenly, unexpectedly, such a journalist, or his leader, becomes involved in a corruption or some other scandal. And here Western justice and public opinion is inexorable. Because such a character cannot carry the truth, right?
      2. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky April 1 2018 11: 23
        +9
        Quote: Spartanez300
        It is necessary to punish these scammers up to criminal liability.
        They are from the criminal, blind the image of the "political sufferer from the regime." They are more likely to benefit than harm. But if they crush LLC for supplying false information with a very large ruble, then here they may come to enlightenment. They are ready to go for any dirty tricks for babos, and for the real threat of losing the same babos, they will begin to filter information. And if several fines do not comprehend this audience, then in court to deprive them of their license.
        1. Plate
          Plate April 1 2018 15: 23
          +2
          Isn't it better to increase fines? Up to millions, and then billions ... Everything to increase, increase ... After all, the media that does not have serious support will quickly run out of it. And if the support is serious, then the extra injections will not hinder the budget wink
          1. jjj
            jjj April 1 2018 16: 57
            +3
            If the publication reprints the news with reference to the source, then, according to our legislation, no sanctions can be applied to such a publication. As an exception: appeals under an extremist article, inciting all kinds of discord, disclosure of secrets
            1. victor50
              victor50 April 4 2018 08: 51
              0
              Do we have immutable legislation ?!
    3. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov April 1 2018 09: 20
      +18
      Quote: Dead Day
      it seems, only from the "press", only RT for Russia ..

      I remember when RT was created, here on the site such nagging began like "Putin has nowhere to put money, it would be better if he raised pensions for pensioners, etc."
      But RT perfectly coped with its task, many in the world watching it worrying about Russia and learn the truth ..
      "public opinion in the world" has long been bought by some comrades ".. Remember the deceased" of our "Berezovsky .. He first bought the channel and other media! And it started ..
      As I recall this devilry on our TV channels "blood, the dollar, bloody Stalin, slavish backward Russia, it would be better if the Germans surrendered, etc." Putin came to power, he first pressed these “Western clickers” and dispersed them, and then he calmly started restoring everything that they did not manage to plunder and destroy .. I felt this first thing and realized that Putin would be good. Well done Volodya!
      1. jjj
        jjj April 1 2018 16: 59
        +5
        If you look at RT from the Russian bell tower, then the so-so desk. Middle arm. But in the West, their "diet" news is becoming a revelation. Apparently, there is information at the seams
      2. GUSAR
        GUSAR April 1 2018 17: 11
        +3
        And now is not devilry on our TV?
        1. Prosha
          Prosha April 1 2018 22: 56
          +4
          You know, if you look at our TV, it becomes clear that there is no television as such. Where are the author’s programs, where are ours, rather than remade and not bought entertainment programs, where are normal analytical programs involving competent specialists, where are the television films in the end? There is a continuous discussion of news, news and imported films. You don’t need to learn anything yet, you don’t need to improve in the profession of reporters and television reporters, take the news, invite more talkers from one side or the other and the program is ready for 2-3-4 -... hours . Conveniently! there are no costs, the broadcasting grid is full - the loot with shovels .... Correctly you said --- DEFAULT!
          1. your1970
            your1970 April 3 2018 12: 05
            +1
            there are channels on which there are NO GENERAL imported films, only ours (maybe not very high quality, or frankly crap, or good, but ours) ...
            There are several channels - on which only old Soviet films are shown
            Who does not allow you to switch channels?
            1. Prosha
              Prosha April 3 2018 19: 06
              0
              there was a song on the Soviet stage, I don’t remember the name, but there were such words in it ... we have too early memories ... switch channels of course, but the same condom can be used, forgive me for the sharpness of the example. Moreover, you yourself acknowledge that they and
              frankly crap and maybe not very high quality
              yes, at times it’s already naive ... But I want a modern television product and preferably of high quality.
      3. dSK
        dSK April 2 2018 00: 50
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        realized that Putin will be good

        "The President introduced two bills to the State Duma. One of them concerns amendments to the Code of Administrative Offenses on the seizure of property of legal entities for bribes or bribery, the second is designed to improve control in the field of combating corruption. " RBC: 01/04/2018
      4. Tatanka Yotanka
        Tatanka Yotanka April 2 2018 07: 15
        +3
        Quote: MIKHAN
        I remember when RT was created, here on the site

        when the respected MIKHAN registered in RT for 3 years broadcast to America, well, when it was created and there was no military review)) hehe fellow
        1. Antares
          Antares April 2 2018 13: 59
          +1
          Quote: Tatanka Yotanka
          Quote: MIKHAN
          I remember when RT was created, here on the site

          when the respected MIKHAN registered in RT for 3 years broadcast to America, well, when it was created and there was no military review)) hehe fellow

          urban legends they are .....
      5. victor50
        victor50 April 4 2018 08: 58
        0
        Something I did not notice major changes in the media: all the same hi-girls, debauchery, blood, violence, aliens, propaganda - the main thing is to be shown on TV ... And I also forgot - it’s infinite both in time and in quantity , a lot of talking heads and "experts", with their conclusions like "outskirts left a month" for the past 4 years.
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 1 2018 06: 41
    +10
    Moreover, they did this contrary to generally accepted standards, not even of high-quality, but simply of conscientious journalism, involving at least minimal verification of information from a clearly dubious source.

    And then we ask ourselves about the ethics of journalism, the principles of impartiality .... All this is in the past, now they will also bury their living mother for grandmas. These media are disgusting and disgusting in relation to people.
    1. Hoc vince
      Hoc vince April 1 2018 09: 50
      +3
      In Washington, the broadcasting of the RT channel was stopped - this is one of the characteristic signs of preparing for war (monopolization of the media).
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 April 1 2018 09: 52
        +2
        Hoc vince Today, 09: 50 ↑ New
        In Washington, the broadcasting of the RT channel was stopped - this is one of the characteristic signs of preparing for war (monopolization of the media).

        Yes there is such a fact. Now it's our turn.
      2. siberalt
        siberalt April 1 2018 10: 56
        +5
        Is banning RT broadcasting on cable channels for subscribers that make up about a percent of the US population is preparation for war? Who cares he will be found on the Internet. But Russia has a good reason to close our enemy broadcasts in a hundred times larger volume. winked
        1. aszzz888
          aszzz888 April 1 2018 12: 33
          +4
          sibiralt (Oleg) Today, 10: 56But Russia has a good reason to close our broadcasts a hundred times more

          hi ! "Reason" then appeared, only if we take advantage ... request
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Victor N
            Victor N April 1 2018 23: 36
            +1
            Forgot Soviet time? Everyone listened. And now it’s simply impossible to block.
  4. Beholder
    Beholder April 1 2018 07: 07
    +3
    Yes, punish for reprinting information from other sources (newspapers, information portals, sites ... etc.) without checking for authenticity. Reprinted - it means you believe in truthfulness and bear full responsibility for the lie. And now they are printing with a "link to ......" and are not responsible for anything.
    1. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer April 1 2018 11: 11
      +3
      If you really punish the media for lying, and with serious fines, then very many gentlemen journalists will be left without work. They have a mentality such that in any case you need to shout the loudest, and most importantly - the first. Otherwise, there is no sensation - that means there is no rating. Well, if any disgusting publication is paid, then checking the facts for them is the height of insanity.
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 April 1 2018 18: 17
        +3
        Quote: Reserve officer
        Otherwise, there is no sensation - that means there is no rating.

        And, most importantly, the headline is flashy, catchy. fellow But far to go, everything is close by, yeah. Title: "Russia" choked on "record wheat harvest", resource - "Reporter" (child of VO). The note itself without authorship (link only to the photo), the content ... yes, if interested, you can go from here automatically. And, of course, the content has very little to do with the headline. It seems that this “reporter” is a “basket” for VO, and the corresponding contingent is being pulled there.
  5. Ascetic
    Ascetic April 1 2018 07: 16
    +13
    Check media "loyalty" on news related to Israel? Almost all of the media in our country are liberal, which means that they are pro-Zionist and there is no terrible secret here,
  6. SPACE
    SPACE April 1 2018 07: 18
    +4
    If not even half, but at least one-third of the mainstream press of the United States, approached with a similar measure of bias and hostility towards their country, America’s song would have been sung long ago. Russia, of course, is not so weak, but its safety margin is not infinite. Especially if it will continue to continue to hammer at a temechko dashing distributors of fried fakes.
    Author: Yuri Selivanov

    There is no evil, without good, but for the beaten, they give two unbeaten. From such a situation, there’s even more benefit, people, which is very noticeable by the way, have begun to develop critical thinking, fakes as a vaccine for a new virus, which means people are getting smarter, the only question is how much fantasy they have, and then this informational horse is already almost driven.

    Only problems and struggles improve a person, and not a soft sofa. In order to understand what is good, you must face evil. In general, fake as a business and as an element of propaganda is stupid, a tactical move that benefits only in the short term and only among idiots, the number of which it highlights.
  7. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 1 2018 07: 49
    +2
    And all because the press was given a lot, but little is asked of it for an outright lie! Our bodies should use the article for cleansing more often and all kinds of fakes will disappear forever. Like some of the openly anti-Russian minded media in the country!
  8. oracul
    oracul April 1 2018 07: 49
    +7
    Is it worth breaking spears because of our journalism? Regrettably, it is as it is. And another is not yet in sight. Indeed, many young journalists who at one time rocked the USSR without disdaining anything, now have matured, become chief editor, their deputies, head. departments, members of the pool of "authoritative personalities." They live by ratings, which means money. Therefore, they are primarily interested in the speed of providing news, preferably hot, and possibly sensational. Sources, links is secondary. The main thing is to get ahead of a competitor, even for a minute, but get ahead at any cost. The formula for salvation from accusations is simple - the opinion of the author does not always coincide with the opinion of the publisher, or the editors are not responsible for the opinion of the author.
  9. Fedorov
    Fedorov April 1 2018 08: 10
    +4
    "Echo of Moscow" is financed from the budget, for example, even the GDP said this. So what do you want ? They have us, but are we getting stronger?
    Maybe a thought plan is so tricky? Otvetka then request
    1. Terenin
      Terenin April 1 2018 10: 06
      +5
      Quote: Fedorov
      Maybe a thought plan is so tricky?

      It’s important that there isn’t such a plan lol
      1. Mestny
        Mestny April 1 2018 11: 01
        +1
        This is a feature of all coups and revolutions.
        First, kill the economy that it was - then for decades persistently revive with millions of victims.
        But our revolutionaries do not understand this point blank.
        1. Conserp
          Conserp April 1 2018 11: 53
          +1
          You do not understand the meaning of the term "revolution" and how it differs from a coup d'etat.
    2. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack April 1 2018 11: 55
      +5
      Quote: Fedorov
      "Echo of Moscow" is funded from the budget ... even GDP said this

      (lazily yawning): there will be no details, of course ...
      My dear, you have glitches request
      PS: although, if from the "budget" ... but differently - hardly ...
  10. Wilderness
    Wilderness April 1 2018 08: 11
    +7
    It was necessary to introduce a certain rating of “yellowness” yesterday: you publish rumors from rubbish bins - and live there, forget about official events and accreditations (forget about financial support too). I think natural selection will play a role.
  11. Altona
    Altona April 1 2018 08: 41
    +6
    As soon as a new massive informal pressure on Russia began, years since 2013, all these "independent" media have become frank tabloids. And the Yandex news column generally became Deutsche Wochenschau.
  12. Vard
    Vard April 1 2018 09: 02
    +2
    The media write what the consignors need ... Borrowists are afraid to breathe without the go-ahead of the owner ... So look for who the owner is ...
    1. Mestny
      Mestny April 1 2018 11: 03
      -1
      Well, well ... And who?
      Another teenage ravings about a single power?
  13. turbris
    turbris April 1 2018 09: 07
    +2
    It's time to end these games in the "free press", the situation is not the same, only media oriented to Russia can hold the blow under the pressure of the West. Therefore, it is necessary to strictly approach the orientation of media owners, editors and journalists who are not appropriate to dismiss, close the media and spit on the opinion of the "civilized" world.
    1. _Sergei_
      _Sergei_ April 5 2018 05: 17
      0
      Do you want to close VO? Where, then, will some commentators write about "thieves' power"?
      1. turbris
        turbris April 5 2018 18: 09
        0
        Sometimes it seems to me that VO needs to be closed, too many bloggers-critics have warmed up here.
  14. Strashila
    Strashila April 1 2018 09: 16
    +1
    The result ... of all these statements in the Russian press ... in the Western media according to the repeated statements of the Russian media happened .. and further in the text, the circle closed ... because the headlines of our media do not have a source of information and its reliability, now they already the basis for statements in the West ... where they will already refer to them.
  15. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov April 1 2018 09: 21
    0
    Yuri, and now ask the following question: whose money does this pseudo-liberal publication contain? You won’t believe it, but often with state money or not oligarchs.
    1. yuriyselivanov
      April 1 2018 11: 11
      +1
      Sources of financing for the press in Russia are the trade secrets of their owners. The law requiring their disclosure has been repeatedly blocked in the State Duma.
      1. andrej-shironov
        andrej-shironov April 1 2018 18: 20
        0
        laughing Three times ha ha ha Yuri. With Ear Matza, too, misunderstandings? wink
  16. Comrade Kim
    Comrade Kim April 1 2018 09: 54
    +10
    Quote: Spartanez300
    It is necessary to punish these scammers up to criminal liability.

    On echo of Moscow (you need to know the enemy by sight) with my own ears I heard the host condemning the "occupation of Crimea."
    And this radio station exists at the expense of our taxes (Gazprom is the public domain).
    Another unpleasant fact you need to know about: the national composition of the “democratic” media. The parallels with Germany at the beginning of the XNUMXth century are simply terrifying:
    “In Germany, Austria and Hungary, the beginning of the XNUMXth century. the publishers, editors, and authors of most national newspapers that are not specifically Christian or anti-Semitic were Jews. (However, in Vienna even Christian and anti-Semitic newspapers were sometimes published by Jews). ” The author quotes the opinion of one researcher, Stephen Beller: "In a century when the press was the only media, cultural or not, the liberal press was predominantly Jewish." The author makes the following reservation: “The modern age did not begin with the Jews. They entered it late and had little to do with many of his most important episodes (such as the scientific and industrial revolutions) and had difficulty adjusting to his many demands. They adapted better than anyone, and as a result transformed the whole world, but they were not present in the act of creation and in the early distribution of roles. ”. From the book of I.R.Shafarevich.
    And now the press, radio stations in opposition to power, belong to the Jews.
    They slander, replace facts and concepts, destroy the concept - the homeland.
    Why are we obliged to pay taxes, which contain resources undermining our country.
    Why we do not have the right to appoint to leadership positions on a fair principle, in a country where the majority of the population is Russian, leaders must be Russian.
    Now they’ll fly dull the Israelis will cry out about the infringement of the truth, let them open their eyes, imagine that only Buryats are sitting in the Knesset, Buryats are on TV and radio, gynecologists and dentists in Israel - and those are Buryats.
    I’m sure that in a couple of days it will not be possible that honest Buryats will be slandered, exiled to the Gulag (in the USSR, the entire Gulag authorities were Jewish: Chief - Berman Yakov Matveyevich.
    Until 1936, the Chief of the Main Directorate of Correctional Labor Camps-the Gulag-was Commissar III of rank Berman Matvey, and the Chief of the NKVD Department of the USSR was another commissioner of rank III, Berman Boris. Apparently it was the Bermanov family contract.
    His deputy - Rapoport SG, then - Eyhmans F.I.
    Chief Accountant of the NKVD Berenzon
    The chief of the chemical laboratory (poisoning by poisons) Mairanovsky
    Deputy MD Berman and the head of the Free and Settlement Administration of the NKVD of the USSR - Firin Samuil Yakovlevich.
    Head of camps and settlements on the territory of the Karelian ASSR, while the head of the White Sea political camp is Kogan Samuil Leonidovich.
    Head of camps and settlements of the Northern Territory - Finkelstein.
    Head of camps and settlements of the Sverdlovsk region - Pogrebinsky.
    The chief of camps and settlements of Western Siberia is Sabo (according to other sources Shabo), then Gogel
    The chief of camps and settlements of Kazakhstan is Wolin.
    Head of the ELEPHANT (Solovetsky Special Purpose Camp) - Serpukhov.
    Head of the Ural-Ural Special Purpose Political Isolator - Mezner.)
    1. dSK
      dSK April 1 2018 17: 57
      0
      Quote: Comrade Kim
      And this radio station exists at the expense of our taxes (Gazprom is the public domain).
      The paradox of Chubais.
    2. BAI
      BAI April 2 2018 11: 11
      0
      Gazprom Media, has long been merged with the Rossiya Bank through a chain of intermediaries. The vertical of power is as follows - GM - GPB-Gazfond-Bank "Russia". And at the top of the chain, it is not known how, a certain TradeInvestments LLC is involved - with an authorized capital of 10 thousand rubles.
  17. venik
    venik April 1 2018 09: 55
    +4
    ".... and peremptory, in the spirit of the worst traditions of agitprop, the version of Vzglyad: (" Media: "Russian radars did not notice the Israeli F-35") ..... "
    ============
    Dear Yuri Selivanov! This is of course an "aerobatics" analyst to draw conclusions based on TITLE articles! In this case, not really bothering yourself, at least a superficial viewing of their contents! After all, at least a little literate person is well aware that the title of an article (material) is often directly opposite to the content ironic subtext!
    I don’t have time and desire to study ALL articles on this topic, but I often look through one publication, namely, “Vzglyad” and know that this publication is DIFFICULT to reproach with “opposition” and addiction to “fakes” - this is a rather serious publication, unlike you work SERIOUS analysts!
    So, what was actually published in the article you mentioned:
    Title: "Media: Russian radars did not notice Israeli F-35s"
    Annotation: "The Israeli Air Force conducted a reconnaissance flight in Iranian airspace in March, while the Russian air defense systems and radars in Syrian territory they were allegedly not noticedsources in the Kuwaiti newspaper Aljarida said. "
    Further: "The F-35 was designed as a fighter with stealth technologies, however, as the media noted, the aircraft is visible to Russian radars.
    Note that between Tel Aviv and Shiraz about 1,7 thousand kilometers. F-35 flight range is not more than 2,5 thousand kilometers. Thus, for the operation reported by Aljarida, it was necessary to attract tankers. Israel has them, but nothing was said about their participation in the operation.

    We also add that Aljarida has previously been repeatedly accused of publishing information about certain operations of the Israeli army, which do not subsequently receive confirmation. The portal has already been suspected of collaborating with the Israeli authorities.

    In November, it was reported that the Syrian Soviet-made S-200VE Vega-E complex, which had previously attacked the latest Israeli F-35 fighter in the sky above Lebanon, withstood a retaliatory strike. .... "
    ============
    Summary: At least - this material you either DIDN'T READ at all (despite the fact that it is very short - 3/4 of the material given here), or you knowingly lie!
    After that, to study all the others - just got sick!
    =======
    In now I quote you:
    "... But in this particular case, we note that exactly half of the leading Russian publications mentioned in the tops of this topic spoke out openly biased towards Russia and its armed forces (far from patriotic). Moreover, they did so contrary to generally accepted standards not quality, but just conscientious journalism, involving at least minimal verification of information from a clearly dubious source.... "
    ====
    So WHO, after this, is UNFAMILY journalist? In my opinion - YOU, my dear !!!!!
    1. yuriyselivanov
      April 1 2018 11: 14
      +4
      Before criticizing, one should at least read the criticized article. You were too lazy to do even that. If you read, you probably would not write nonsense about that. that the author did not read the post of “Vzglyad”, a fragment of which is even quoted in my article.
    2. dSK
      dSK April 1 2018 18: 20
      +1
      Quote: venik
      Note that between Tel Aviv and Shiraz about 1,7 thousand kilometers. F-35 flight range is not more than 2,5 thousand kilometers.
      F-35 could "theoretically" fly through Jordan and Iraq, bypassing Syria.
      Mister "Broom", Israel is waiting for you, it is sorely lacking "cannon fodder", enough to "excite" the keyboard.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. unignm
    unignm April 1 2018 10: 22
    +1
    Quality journalism, but is there anyway? headings sometimes do not match the content. I judged for this
  20. 23rus
    23rus April 1 2018 10: 33
    +1
    Well, they will not bite their lactating hand .... Investors in Russian media are described in the net, and they are not always Russian.
  21. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur April 1 2018 10: 56
    0
    Most media are supported by the State Department. But the thing is even say on the state channel how
    "Russia" can work very unpatriotic journalists. And there is also a format for presenting information taken from the Americans: it’s not true, but a sensation that would catch a potential reader, increase circulation (views), and advertising is more and more expensive from here.
  22. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 1 2018 11: 57
    0
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Quote: Dead Day
    it seems, only from the "press", only RT for Russia ..

    I remember when RT was created, here on the site such nagging began like "Putin has nowhere to put money, it would be better if he raised pensions for pensioners, etc."
    But RT perfectly coped with its task, many in the world watching it worrying about Russia and learn the truth ..
    "public opinion in the world" has long been bought by some comrades ".. Remember the deceased" of our "Berezovsky .. He first bought the channel and other media! And it started ..
    As I recall this devilry on our TV channels "blood, the dollar, bloody Stalin, slavish backward Russia, it would be better if the Germans surrendered, etc." Putin came to power, he first pressed these “Western clickers” and dispersed them, and then he calmly started restoring everything that they did not manage to plunder and destroy .. I felt this first thing and realized that Putin would be good. Well done Volodya!


    Wawan had not yet spoken his word, he was just looking closely. But before the successor, the site must be cleaned up! No questions. And then maybe along the borders of the Russian Federation it will be necessary to arrange weeding, otherwise weeds have grown a bit too much!
  23. Rimlianin
    Rimlianin April 1 2018 12: 52
    +5
    Over the past 15 years, our mass media have frankly turned yellow, they are not bent on giving out fake, unverified information, and fulfilling political orders. After the frank, custom-made "Mochilov" of Grudinin, neither the First nor the Second Channel exists for me; I do not believe Solovyov and Kiselev, Pimenov and other pseudo-journalists. And if they shout loudly that the West is allegedly attacking innocent Russia, I no longer believe them. Who lied once, the second time does not deserve trust.
    1. dSK
      dSK April 1 2018 18: 32
      0
      Quote: Rimlianin
      West attacks innocent Russia

      And what, everything is on the back? So far, Russia is conducting only "defensive" battles.
      You "Roman" issued a foreign passport, a visa to Italy? And if the "counteroffensive" begins?
      1. Rimlianin
        Rimlianin April 1 2018 19: 13
        +2
        Counterattack? Do not tell my slippers! You still do not understand that all the "confrontation" with the West is happening on TV, for our ears, so that you do not ask questions about domestic politics? Our economy is on its side, not getting up, for three or four years. And what kind of economy? The entire Russian economy is the sale of raw materials and the resale to the population of Chinese junk. Isn’t that so? Go down to earth, dear! What a ... counter attack? Not even funny, by golly!
  24. Filxnumx
    Filxnumx April 1 2018 12: 53
    +1
    I allow myself to note the bias of the author himself regarding the concept of "patriotic press." Firstly, in my opinion, "from openly biased towards Russia and its armed forces positions" were made not by nine publications, but by five: Rambler, Lenta.ru, News, Ruposters.ru, Vzglyad.ru. What is biased in the phrase "bypassed the radar" or "bypassing the radar"? Well, bypassed and bypassed, our radars are stationary, their coverage areas are known. And on the other hand, if Israel does not crawl into the ramp, but walks around the edge to the area of ​​our air defense, so that they do not once again track the signature of its latest aircraft - is this not a manifestation of commendable caution and respect for the Russian Armed Forces? The author, apparently, had temporary difficulties with understanding the Russian language and he decided to inform an external audience about it. Or beat your own so that strangers are afraid?
  25. saltickov.
    saltickov. April 1 2018 15: 38
    +2
    It has long been surprising Komsomolskaya Pravda, even before the Olympics in London with which I noticed the headlines with enthusiasm, we were suspended from the Olympics, you start reading yes no, everything is in doubt. it’s not ours anymore, they still offer their own filthy mailing list to hell with it.
    1. dSK
      dSK April 1 2018 18: 46
      0
      Quote: saltickov.
      It has long been surprising TVNZ
      He is preparing a growing shift for Gennady Andreyevich.
  26. tank64rus
    tank64rus April 1 2018 17: 07
    +2
    A state is only worth something if it can defend itself. It doesn't seem like it's time to change this approach to the media. If it works for column 5, then let there be an NPO-foreign agent, as well as its oligarch master. If this is a state-owned publication, it must first understand that it speaks on behalf of the state and the price of error here is incomparable with a private publication, then people will not believe the provocateurs, but they still have to earn it from their People.
  27. Nikolay Kuznetsov
    Nikolay Kuznetsov April 1 2018 17: 52
    +1
    What was Goebels saying about impudent lies? That's the same, so that there is nothing to be surprised ... The usual tricks against the enemy. Someone doubts that a war is being waged against us? Already without politicians and diplomats .. Everything suits.
  28. wandlitz
    wandlitz April 1 2018 18: 48
    0
    Well, it's just to check it out. Let them try again to fly, even if they take another route. Then we'll see if they managed to "deceive the Russian radars in Syria."
  29. Compass
    Compass April 1 2018 19: 14
    +1
    Everywhere there are rights and obligations. Moreover, the rights and obligations balance each other. Decent journalists enjoy the right to freedom of speech, and in exchange they undertake to carry this word truthfully and honestly. But these are decent journalists, and dishonest journalists for some reason everywhere yell about their rights to freedom of speech, but for some reason they never fulfill their reciprocal duty of honest and truthful speech.
    ! On April 2, 1961, Gagarin had already landed, and I did not read out the TASS Statement prepared in advance on the radio. In the Statement, there are two versions of Gagarin's military rank, "senior lieutenant" (flew into space in this rank) and "major" (which should have been awarded if successful). Journalists do not have reliable information that the USSR Minister of Defense signed or did not sign the order to award the new rank. The application was not transmitted until they received reliable confirmation that the minister signed the order. And this was world-wide news and God forbid for journalists to give the slightest inaccuracy. The man in space! It seems to be the difference "senior lieutenant" or "major." So, as M. Yu. Lermontov wrote, "... Yes, there were people in our time, not like the current tribe! ...." Not that it is now the present journalistic tribe!
    1. lance
      lance April 1 2018 20: 51
      0
      I allow myself to correct you about Gagarin. even the chief editors were notified of the miracle, but they did not know what kind of miracle it was. the corresponding people knew, and they held two answers in their left and right hands. Well, then I agree with you.
    2. Antares
      Antares April 2 2018 14: 05
      0
      Quote: Compass
      Yes, there were people in our time, not like the current tribe

      the value of the photographs was also different. And now in the toilet they take more photos than in the PMR.
      The value of information in those years was higher, as well as the exchange rate. Inflation of information due to its massiveness and accessibility is a common market
      TASS reports could be quoted as the official and firm position of the USSR in the foreign information market (providing value and importance). Who can boast like that now?
      1. Antares
        Antares April 2 2018 14: 36
        0
        If not even half, but at least one third of the US mainstream press came up with a similar measure of bias and hostility to their country, then America’s song would have been sung for a long time

        Each country has its own atmosphere.
        Formally, the activities of the press in the United States are practically not regulated by anyone. All newspapers are private. To open a newspaper, there is no need to obtain a license from any government agency. It is enough to have desire and money for this. There is no censorship. There is no official “act of secrets," or law, which stipulates that certain government documents must be kept secret for a number of years, as is the case, for example, in the UK. It is clear that there are classified materials related to national security issues, but in general, the law on free access to information allows journalists to receive information that would be considered inaccessible in another country.
        But there are factors that can limit this freedom. Among them are self-censorship, especially corporate, market requirements, influence and pressure on journalists from the owners, publishers of the media. Actual censorship can be carried out in the office of the editor-in-chief of a newspaper or magazine. In addition, there are several notes to the First Amendment that allow it to be violated in special cases. True, in this case, the American administration needs to present strong arguments, to explain that in a particular case, restricting freedom of the press is necessary to achieve a goal of great importance, such as protecting national security.
        in 1971, the New York Times, followed by the Washington Post, began publishing Pentagon documents related to the Vietnam War, which exposed US aggression.
        But, after hearing the arguments of the parties, the US Supreme Court decided by a majority vote that the government did not provide convincing arguments in favor of issuing a court order banning publications.
        For example, the confrontation between the newspaper and the White House is the "Watergate affair." Everyone remembers how it all ended?
        And today, similar events unfold in connection with the publication on the Internet by the Wikileaks agency of secret documents from the US Department of State and the Pentagon. This time, the main culprit of the scandalous revelations to the founder of the agency, Julian Assange, is threatened with arrest and imprisonment and even death.
        Their situation is about the same as in the world - they belong to local oligarchs (such as Murdoch), the number of monopolies is reduced, readers go online, live on advertising revenue. They write what is interesting to readers. The sharpest political topics are petty to avoid. Large can but with serious sources.
        The main thing is to establish the essence of the publication. It is no secret that any publication “against the country” is a publication against the Government (the current party / parliament / president) and not against everything that is connected with the country.
        Sometimes this is very profitable and can be supported by the Government for solving certain problems. The Government itself is not homogeneous and there is a competitive struggle.
        In general, the publications considered in this article cannot fall under the definition of "crimes against citizens of the Russian Federation and the country's security," rather speculation and market relations. And since the largest Russian media are owned by oligarchs "close to the emperor" or the party is authorized to publish such publications "approved from above."
  30. Karabin
    Karabin April 1 2018 20: 54
    +2
    Personally, I was especially struck by the following versions: the frankly heady title of Lenta.ru ("Israeli fighters tricked Russian radars in Syria")

    Me too. But on the resource that posted this article.
    But in this particular case, we note that exactly half of the leading Russian publications noted in the tops of this topic came out from openly biased positions (far from patriotic) with respect to Russia and its armed forces.

    And if not in the top, but below? Is VO considered then biased and not patriotic to Russia?
  31. shirkoled
    shirkoled April 2 2018 00: 22
    0
    Yeah, it seems that in the Russian media sorovskie liberal followers dug in !!! If Putin V.V. will bring about the Russian order in Russia, then he will have to work hard !!!
  32. Beltasir matyagu
    Beltasir matyagu April 2 2018 00: 48
    0
    Just a license is selected
  33. WERSTA.
    WERSTA. April 2 2018 05: 28
    0
    In Russia, the opposition very often turns into a camp of enemies. It’s just that the sources of financing dictate everything and they lose their “banks”.
  34. BAI
    BAI April 2 2018 10: 53
    0
    Quality journalism and prejudice towards one’s own country are incompatible and mutually exclusive.

    Absolutely agree. A real journalist can’t bother his country.
    I will give the following opinion:
    To write well about the country and its people, and for millions to read it, a journalist must have remarkable talent. But only a few possess talent. The rest are forced to earn on the market.
    N. Varsegov “KP”
  35. Angina
    Angina April 2 2018 15: 03
    +1
    Well, nothing like that pulls on analytics: the view on the problem is one-sided. The same populism for personal gain.

    First, how do people come to journalism? That's right, most of them entered the university after school. It is no secret to anyone that for a long time the school has been practicing the division into techies and humanities. Therefore, everything related to technology, even mathematics, to the physics of processes for students is a polar night. I really have a young talent for 45 minutes could not solve the usual proportion of 16/9 = 1024 / x. But this is also our fault: it was the reform of education that led to this. For some reason, none of the graduates had made round eyes before hearing a “function”, “degree”, or “logarithm”. Those editions where techies come are lucky. In the future, they will become "technical consultants", such as "stalkers" in the world of technology and electronics.

    The second nuance. In the yard we have capitalism. Therefore, those who first issued the news have more visitors. Therefore, there are more chances to get money from advertisers. In other words, "the one who got up first, that and slippers." And this is not a secret behind the seven seals for a journalist.

    Finally, for one more nuance. The author also “juggles” using the same viral technologies.
    "How the major Russian media relate to their homeland." Yes, they do not relate to the homeland in this way, but the news is presented like that. And it is necessary to disassemble from this point of view. Otherwise, then, then, should the material be placed under the heading "Analytics"? To make it cooler? But then let us take War and Peace apart from the point of view of tactics and weapons, and not as a literary work.
  36. 1536
    1536 April 3 2018 14: 22
    0
    This is a “good” result, 50: 50. Apparently, with regard to the activities of the Army, many people first think and then blindly start typing words and sentences on the keyboard. Coverage of other areas of our lives can be much worse: elections, economics, industry, foreign policy, everyday life, etc. It’s better to immediately include CNN or the BBC with Freedom and draw up your own opinion on the primary sources than arm yourself with someone "look". Apparently, they are paid money for it, and people hawala it for free, sorry, mr, but it also praises. Although the level of consumption of half-truth and outright falsehood has not yet reached the scale of a perestroika press. But still to come? People are actively working in this direction.
  37. The comment was deleted.