PJSC "Il": the tactical and technical task for IL-276 approved

The Ministry of Industry and Trade and the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) have approved the tactical and technical specifications for the promising military transport aircraft Il-276, the press service of PJSC Il (part of the transport division) said aviation UAC).

At present, the tactical and technical assignment (TTZ) for the medium military transport aircraft IL-276 has been approved by the United Aircraft Building Corporation and the Ministry of Industry and Trade. With the Ministry of Defense TTZ agreed, to finalize its approval is planned no later than the second quarter of 2018

- told the company Ilyushin.

The company added that the project IL-276 involves the creation of a tanker, point of contact and an air hospital.

The primary task of the program is to build a transport aircraft that will meet all the requirements of the military. At the same time, technical solutions are being worked out taking into account the various options for the aircraft. Further, it all depends on the decision of the customer, which option will be needed first, and he will see the sky

- reported in the press service of the company

The IL-276 medium military transport aircraft, previously known as the Russian-Indian project MTA (Multipurpose Transport Aircraft), is being developed to replace the front-line An-12. The first flight of the IL-276 is scheduled for 2023 year, in 2025, it is planned to complete development work, and from 2026 of the year - to begin serial deliveries in the interests of the Russian Defense Ministry, reports TASS

Comments

[210ox]

Well, now KB is in a good way .. And try without delay, ..

[Proxima]

Quote: 210ox

Well, now KB is in a good way .. And try without delay, ..

Good news! The Ilyushinites finally got excited. Earlier there was a message: “The upgraded wide-body long-haul airliner Il-96-400M can be presented to customers by the end of 2019. This was reported in PJSC Ilyushin, engaged in the design and manufacture of these machines.
"To date, the production program has seven IL-96 machines, one experimental and six serial. As such, we do not plan a rollout yet, but a presentation for customers can be organized closer to the end of 2019, "the company said
Long haul is demonstration of man-made power of the state. Now only Airbus and Boeing can do this, and I thought it was a sinful thing that we finally buried the production of long-range aircraft. Let's hope!

[avt]

Quote: Proxima

Good news!

Joys full of pants from the fact that the MTA was renamed from IL-214 to IL-276 ?? Right now, joy in your pants still comin

The contract for the first stage of aircraft development from MTAL was received by the UAC and HAL on October 12, 2012. At the opening of the DefExpo-2014 exhibition on February 06, 2014, it was announced that in 2018-2019 It is planned to release the first prototype of the aircraft. In 2019, respectively, it is planned to release a second prototype, and in 2020 it is planned to begin mass production of the aircraft. In total, there are plans to produce together with India about 200 aircraft for the Russian Air Force (100 units), India (45 units)

Pour further in rapture about

Quote: 210ox

Well, now KB is in a good way .. And try without delay, ..

[Proxima]

Quote: avt

Quote: Proxima

Good news!

Joys full of pants from the fact that the MTA was renamed from IL-214 to IL-276 ?? Right now, you joy in my pants still comin

What did you want to say, dear? Hell .. some kind of written

[bnm.99]

Another eternally dissatisfied fighter with the anti-people regime does not catch up with the fact that the project was originally a joint project with India, but because of the ritual Hindu dances with a tambourine, the business was covered at the very beginning, so we decided to do it ourselves.

[avt]

Quote: bnm.99

Another

Koeckaker does not even want to accept a simple fact like a lowing fact into the brain. That with the money of the Indians actually developed TWO versions of the MTA airplane for the Indians and for themselves IL -214. Which are

Quote: avt

in 2018-2019 It is planned to release the first prototype of the aircraft. In 2019, respectively, it is planned to release a second prototype, and in 2020 it is planned to begin mass production of the aircraft.

But this is not to me, but to a practicing psychiatrist, you can pair with

Quote: Proxima

Hell .. some kind of written

to make an appointment .
And you can continue to write boiling water in ecstasy from happiness

Quote: avt

that the MTA was renamed from IL-214 to IL-276

And the fact that instead of the series that was promised in terms of the above (well, if they are able to add words to letters and understand the meaning of the folded), only

At present, the tactical and technical task (TTZ) for the medium military transport aircraft Il-276 is approved by the United Aircraft Corporation and the Ministry of Industry and Trade.

[Proxima]

Quote: bnm.99

Another eternally displeased fighter with the anti-people regime is not catching up ....

Yes, no dear, this is not a fighter with the Putin regime. This is just a jogger, though "elite". He’s a type of authority in VO, though I also need to troll brains, since I’ve come across his posts from the 14th year and you know - somehow he does without them (brains) Well, not for me, as they say, to judge

[askort154]

Yes, An-12 has served its good job, it's time and a decent change.

[Semen1972]

A more urgent task than all kinds of super bathyscaphes.

[Ramadan]

I think now everything will depend on finances and "dancing" around them.

[keeper03]

Why such a long time? Over 8 years, everything can change, and taking into account the shifts, and all 10-15 years! Are you guys ?! For such a long time, people can die, God forbid! Or are you used to working not for the result, but for the feeder ?! One gets the impression, not otherwise! Everything has been invented for a long time, it remains only to rivet and release, well, so let's speed up, y-may !!!

[helmi8]

Quote: keeper03

Why such a long time?

On the avatar, it’s like an airplane, an aviation epaulet, and such questions ... For a new airplane, from drawings to a series of 8 years, this is nothing. Moreover, there are still no drawings, only TTZ approved ...

[keeper03]

Are you sure that it is new? !! I'm not sure. Look at the exterior ... there are IL-76 and An-148, at least visible! In addition, we already have brains for three years about this plane, and still the drawings are not the same ?!

[helmi8]

I don’t want to argue with you about the fundamentals of the design of aircraft. Just take a word - even the similarity of appearance in the basis underneath has multiple calculations of the fuselage design for strength and aerodynamics (in a nutshell)

[Igor V]

The guys do not understand what design and technological work is, but they have their own opinion! It's funny
They would like to invite them to find out the timing of the design of the car (this is closer to them), then lift this car into the air, create bearing surfaces and controls. Maybe then think about it?

[keeper03]

Regarding the timing, for example, the Tu-154 began to be designed in 1963, and 24 August 1965 year Decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR No. 647-240 was issued, according to which A. Tupolev Design Bureau was instructed to design and build a medium-range Tu-154 passenger aircraft with three turbofan engines of the NK-8-2 type with a take-off thrust of 9500 kg each.
(see [media = https: //aviator.guru/blog/43886911673/TU-1
54 -–- uzhe-istoriya ...- K-47-letiyu-pervogo-poleta-
legendyi]).
[media = https: //militaryarms.ru/passazhirskie-samo
lety / tu-154]
The first stage of the tests began in December 1968 and ended in January 1971, the second stage, corresponding to the State tests, from June to December 1971. In May 1971, the Tu-154 began to be used to transport mail from Moscow to Tbilisi, Sochi, Simferopol and Mineralnye Vody.
It turns out that KB A.N. Tupolev designed and built a new plane in 8 years, without computers, CAD and other software, having only a pencil and a culman on hand !!!
What happened to us over 50 years ?! The question is rhetorical.

[Avis-bis]

Quote: keeper03

In May 1971, the Tu-154 began to be used to transport mail from Moscow to Tbilisi, Sochi, Simferopol and Mineralnye Vody.
It turns out that KB A.N. Tupolev designed and built a new plane in 8 years, without computers, CAD and other software, [u] having only a pencil and a kulman at hand !!!

... and brought it to mind until the end of the 1970s. The first sane Tu-154th was the Tu-154B-2.
Computers, by the way, were already and were then used, including in MAP.

[Dude]

When I look at the timing of the development of aircraft (and not only), I start to think that there was a deep sense in creating sharakh ...

[keeper03]

Of course it made sense when developing new, conceptual models, when practicing a different arrangement of wings, engines, and chassis! And now everything has been invented and developed, it remains only to implement the model in an experimental and industrial way! But this does not mean that you need to abandon the design bureau and research - just this task has become even more difficult and more time-consuming!

[cats]

Quote: keeper03

it’s just that this task has become even more difficult and time consuming

Quote: keeper03

it remains only to rivet and release, well, so let's speed up, y-may !!!

[helmi8]

Quote: keeper03

And now everything has been invented and developed, it remains only to implement the model in an experimental and industrial way!

You argue as if it were an LEGO constructor ... Even when the aircraft is modified from a transport option to a tanker, units and assemblies are rearranged in the name of maintaining alignment and maintaining aerodynamic stability and controllability ... Okay, we will not go into the wilds. Everything is not as simple as it seems at first glance.

[NN52]

And as a tanker, he will not be small?

[Avis-bis]

Quote: NN52

And as a tanker, he will not be small?

Which gas tanker? Not every tanker runs the Tu-95s around the corner. Su-24- "tanker" takes even less.

[NN52]

Avis-bis

I generally know ..
But why ??? This is for Su 24 ..

[Avis-bis]

Quote: NN52

Avis-bis

I generally know ..
But why ???

Then to refuel.

[NN52]

Avis-bis
Expert answer, on the issue of tactical tanker ...
I have no more questions for you.

[Avis-bis]

Quote: helmi8

when the aircraft is modified from a transport option to a fuel tanker, the units and assemblies are rearranged in the name of maintaining alignment and maintaining aerodynamic stability and controllability

And what was redone in the IL-78?

[Filxnumx]

IL-76MD. And the result was a more versatile aircraft: he opened the ramp, pulled out the fuselage barrels and now pity - a military transport aircraft with the ability to refuel from 2 UPAZs from wing tanks at the same time. IL-78M is a “clean” refueling tank: there are no ramps with a pressure shutter (the cargo compartment is not sealed), the cargo compartment doors are “sewn up”. But the FB comes with a lot of fuel due to the facilitation of the entire structure.

[Avis-bis]

Quote: Fil743

IL-76MD.

Yes, I asked somewhat vaguely. I asked not what type of aircraft was converted to IL-78 (I know that), but what was redone to make IL-78? Exactly

when the aircraft is modified from a transport option to a fuel tanker, the units and assemblies are rearranged in the name of maintaining alignment and maintaining aerodynamic stability and controllability

[helmi8]

Quote: Avis-bis

I asked not what type of aircraft was converted to IL-78 (I know that), but what was redone to make IL-78?

You Fil743 (Igor) answered above.

[Avis-bis]

Quote: helmi8

You Fil743 (Igor) answered above.

Come on? He answered how the IL-78M differs from the IL-78 (I did not know this, thanks to him), and I asked what design changes were made to the IL-76 to make the IL-78 out of it. And not every little thing, namely the “re-arrangement of units and assemblies in the name of maintaining centering and maintaining aerodynamic stability and controllability”. Something, for example, I didn’t see on the IL-78 of additional aerodynamic surfaces working to “maintain aerodynamic stability”, unlike, say, the A-100.

[Roma 1977]

I will say more: apparently in the mass shootings of the 30s, the meaning is more and more traced, looking at our objective reality.

[RL]

A little puzzled, truth be told. Having information about the performance characteristics of transport aircraft (we want to buy 3-4 units and don’t ask permission from the USA) of the Il-276, An-12 and Embraer KC-390 aircraft (we participate in the design and production of KC-390) and comparisons these performance characteristics and the economics of operation and the provision of after-sales service (there has always been a weak spot among Soviet and Russian suppliers) and the term commissioning, in my personal opinion, which has nothing to do with the interests of my personal pocket - if you take Embraer KC-390. Although, of course, the conditions may change.
And, if I understood correctly, then TTX, economics, etc. IL-276 (they are familiar with the new TTZs as a potential buyer, although they also don’t tell everyone at once) do not reach the An-12.
To the drawings. I don’t know where, but now the drawings are done on a plotter. The designer sets the performance characteristics of the aircraft and, literally with a hand on the tablet, draws an image of the aircraft, the program corrects it and sets it for printing. Then improvements for a short time, components, ramps, chassis, mounts, frames and other details. During the year, everything goes into production

[RL]

This happened during the old design and production technologies - the Boeing 747, the project started in July 1966, the first take-off on February 9, 1969, the first commercial flight with passengers on board January 22, 1970.

[Avis-bis]

Quote: RL

747, project started July 1966

Wrong. First, a competition was announced for the military-technical cooperation, which the Boeing lost, but had already done a lot in terms of wing design, power plant and plumage. The competition was announced in 1963, and the loss happened in the 1964th. And about the same time, the "project began." In fact, the Boeing needed only to create a new fuselage, the simplest airframe assembly.

[RL]

There were a lot of alterations. There were projects, in a fashionable then, the trend of a propulsion aircraft such as McDonnell Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed L-1011 TriStar. But military-technical cooperation and civilian aircraft are heaven and earth. 747th new project. Totally new. And how quickly everything was created and launched! Used old practices? For God's sake!
Do you want to say that there are no developments in Russia? Or do not know how to work with them? Of course they can! But here is the order and desire ... ???
But "In fact," Boeing "needed only to create a new fuselage, the simplest glider unit" - are you serious ?! For the military-technical cooperation, the fuselage is a warehouse for combat load, masked pilots will breathe, and for civilians it is atmospheric pressure, amenities, a kitchen, toilets, washbasins, maintenance staff, radio and television. You, sir, deigned to compare a hedgehog with a bare ass

[Avis-bis]

Quote: RL

for civilians - this is atmospheric pressure, and amenities, and the kitchen, and toilets, and washbasins, and staff, and radio, and television.

I realized that the list of household equipment is vaguely familiar to you, but this does not mean that you understand the issue. For example, the "fuselage" is a very specific unit of the airframe, and not the "maintenance personnel". And he really is the easiest glider assembly.
If you think that calculating the fuselage for "atmospheric pressure" (actually lower) is so difficult for aircraft designers of the 1960s. task, it’s too early for you to talk about aviation, my dear.
747th developed five years - from the moment of loss in competition. Learn arithmetic.

fashionable then, the trend of the propulsion aircraft such as McDonnell Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed L-1011 TriStar

What later became “TriStar” was originally twin-engine, actually. Fashion Trend ...

[RL]

Okay, let’s not talk about which plane and who understands what. How many years has the IL-276 project been hanging in the air? And that's it!

[Avis-bis]

Quote: RL

How many years has the IL-276 project been hanging in the air?

This is another question. And the answer lies not in the plane of development speed, but in economics, politics and corruption.

[helmi8]

Quote: Avis-bis

For example, the "fuselage" is a very specific unit of the airframe ... And it really is the simplest unit of the airframe.

Dear, there is no simple thing in aviation. Even when connecting the casing with stringers and frames, the rivet diameter and the distance between them are calculated. And the thickness of the skin is different. I am not talking about the profile of the same frame at the attachment points of the units. The plane is not Lada Kalina for you.

[Avis-bis]

Quote: helmi8

Quote: Avis-bis

For example, the "fuselage" is a very specific unit of the airframe ... And it really is the simplest unit of the airframe.

Dear, there is no simple thing in aviation.

Do you know the concept of "relatively"? I did not say that "there is nowhere easier." I said something else. Read carefully.
The wing is loaded much more diverse, more often and more difficult than the fuselage. the wing has a bunch of manufactured units that change the loading of the wing and, in general, its shape more than once during a flight. The chassis is loaded less frequently, but includes a huge number of units and nodes, so this number goes into a quality problem - how to make it work without fail. Plumage with rudders is a wing in miniature, although it does not have such mechanization; it also works quite actively, especially on modern aircraft. So, the fuselage, after all, is the simplest unit of a ramp-free aircraft.

[ARES623]

Quote: helmi8

Dear, there is no simple thing in aviation. Even when the casing is connected with stringers and frames, the rivet diameter and the distance between them are calculated

Everything is complicated in aviation, especially here. Arbus with a Boeing solves the same difficulties, but produces 500 sides per year. And we have IL-214 (MTS, IL-276) only TTZ since 2001 chasing, as bald. I’m ashamed, comrades ...

[Avis-bis]

Quote: ARES623

Everything is complicated in aviation, especially here. Arbus with a Boeing solves the same difficulties, but produces 500 sides per year. And we have IL-214 (MTS, IL-276) only TTZ since 2001 chasing, as bald. I’m ashamed, comrades ...

The reason lies not in the purely aviation plane.

[ARES623]

Quote: Avis-bis

The reason lies not in the purely aviation plane.

Of course. The reason lies in the lost competencies. In the old machine tool park, the collapse of the machine tool industry, in the collapse of the training system for highly qualified personnel, starting with machine tool builders, assemblers, and ending with engineering. If the loot can be raised at the resale of diapers, then why "hunch" at the factory. The system works with a creak.

[Avis-bis]

Quote: ARES623

Of course. The reason lies in ...

And this too, but there is a reason for this: the state did not need all this for a long time. But we will deviate greatly from the topic, including, we will not talk about politics.

[oldav]

An-12 will not survive before the start of mass production.

[Palagecha]

The future of Russian aviation is with balloons, airships and balloons !!! It’s environmentally friendly, economical and massive !!! And how does the commander of the aeronautical troops sound !!!

[Bronevick]

But about 5 years ago they promised in 2019 the first flight.

[ARES623]

A painful birth !!! Can it really come out of this?