Military Review

In Britain, remembered the "Dead Hand" of Russia

90
In Britain, which does not care about tens of thousands of Syrians, Iraqis, Libyans and Serbs who died under the bombs of British military aircraft, but there is a case for Skripal, a single spy, they remembered the existence of a nuclear strike control system in Russia. We are talking about the system "Perimeter", which is vigorously discussed by British experts, promoting the next sanctions anti-Russian measures.


In a typical "yellow" British newspaper Daily Star shows footage of the TV channel "Star" and it is reported that the Kremlin and Vladimir Putin personally have "terrible weapon"Called" Dead Hand ". This is the very "Perimeter", which was developed in the Soviet Union for automated control of a massive nuclear response.

In Britain, remembered the "Dead Hand" of Russia


At the same time, one of the British experts, Bruce Blair, admits a remark not characteristic of the collective West that the Russian Perimeter clearly reduces the degree of hysteria about statements about the “imminent start of a nuclear war”. According to him, the presence of such a system in Russia makes it clear to the West that the very "idea of ​​a nuclear attack is bad, and it is worth thinking twice."

At the same time, Bruce Blair states that the "Perimeter" may be "vulnerable to cyber attacks", and therefore "threatens the entire system of international security." But, strangely, Mr. Blair does not say a word that the British nuclear security system is also vulnerable to cyber attacks, and therefore it clearly threatens the whole world.

A fact remains a fact: the theme of Russia in today's Britain is number one.
Photos used:
REN
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vard
    Vard 29 March 2018 06: 09
    +16
    Ivanov! God bless her with Britain ... but there must be discipline!
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 29 March 2018 06: 15
      +4
      There, only England is very va-nya-et, the rest are more adequate, a little more brains, but there is no courage and desire to tell the truth!
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 29 March 2018 06: 48
        +1
        Quote: Herkulesich
        the rest is more adequate, a little more brains, but there is no courage and desire to tell the truth!

        corporate ethics, allied ethics, the most powerful political pressure of the arrogant Saxons and striped and much more
        1. Black Colonel
          Black Colonel 29 March 2018 07: 40
          +2
          Rather, the ethics of a jackal flock. And while it is unlikely that any of the jackals will fit into the match, if it comes to it.
          1. LSA57
            LSA57 29 March 2018 08: 48
            0
            Quote: Black Colonel
            And while it is unlikely that any of the jackals will fit into the match, if it comes to it.

            and jackals do not climb when the strong are fighting.
          2. rocket757
            rocket757 29 March 2018 08: 49
            +3
            Well, yes, German workers will never go to war .... and further on!
            We will not have illusions! There is a shepherd, with such a serious whip, he will gather the flock in one way or another! There is only one hope, the shepherd also wants to live!
            1. zoolu350
              zoolu350 29 March 2018 10: 46
              +3
              The shepherd will drive the flock, but it can be easily countered: 1. Threatening the shepherd himself, 2. Preventive destruction of one or several individuals in the herd, after which the shepherd will need a VERY SERIOUS WHIP to chase the flocks that will scatter in different directions.
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 29 March 2018 11: 14
                +2
                Point 1 - absolutely agree !!!
                Point 2 - Have you ever grazed a herd of "sheep"? If there is a “BARAN” or “GOAT” in the herd with such cool “bells”, the herd will follow him unconditionally and turn them astray (the majority), I have no idea what to do ??? However, this particular shepherd has more than one “flap” in the herd, fortunately it must be said that there are “goats” (those are also schlindra), gentle “gazelles” (just that, immediately jumping to the side) and the other not very reinforcing this herd "living creatures" ... so the second option may work to some extent!
              2. NEXUS
                NEXUS 29 March 2018 12: 10
                +6
                Quote: zoolu350
                The shepherd will drive the flock, but it can be easily countered: 1. By threatening the shepherd himself

                That is why any aggressive actions of the EU must be tightly tied to the responsibility of the States. That is, in the case of aggression by Europeans (military), so that the mattresses understand very clearly that the first blow will be against them, as the main threat to us. So that the mattresses understand that they can’t sit out in a puddle until the Europeans and we shred each other.
                And the time has long come when our concern, notes of protest, calls to play by the rules do not bother anyone. Any reason for provocation can be found, in order to make us guilty of everything again and again.
                And anti-Russian hysteria is only growing. And today's situation is very similar to the situation in 1941.
                1. sharp-lad
                  sharp-lad 29 March 2018 17: 21
                  +2
                  I completely agree! If Brehania is finely spitting something, immediately give her a kick and a scribble of Zaluzhi! And accordingly, vice versa. With the rest in the same vein: the "winners" of fascism frocked up, the froggers poured along with them, the occupied Muslims (formerly Germany) reacted crookedly to Islam, (the country in which the paddlers were once the majority). To speak with the Baltic states only through their leadership in Zaluzhi or the main allies from the Brussels Caliphate. hi
      2. Chertt
        Chertt 29 March 2018 07: 14
        +6
        Quote: Herkulesich
        There, only England is very va-na-et, the rest are more adequate, a little more brains

        Respected hi Well, what a servile manner ?? They gave us a slap in the face "collectively." And you, "no, this Englishwoman is crap, the rest are good, let's get them .... we’ll kiss and be friends." It is time to finally, mentally, break away from the European peninsula, and take a closer look at the whole other world. There are many true, equal and profitable partners.
        1. Herculesic
          Herculesic 29 March 2018 07: 23
          +4
          Chertt, I simply stated the fact that the principle of spoiling Russia in all ages was stronger in England, and the rest of Britain dutifully carried out English orders! So, first of all, you need to beat England, it’s painful, painful, maybe you can even kick it with your feet! The rest will understand everything quickly! And for the phrase addressed to me, "servile manner," I can tear my head off! !!! am
          1. Chertt
            Chertt 29 March 2018 07: 36
            +3
            Quote: Herkulesich
            So you need to first beat England, hard, painful, maybe even kick

            You just need to beat anyone who doesn’t open his mouth
            Quote: Herkulesich
            And for the phrase addressed to me, "servile manner," I can tear my head off! !!!

            Save strength for enemies yes We are definitely not enemies
        2. LSA57
          LSA57 29 March 2018 07: 46
          +6
          Quote: Chertt
          There are many true, equal and profitable partners.

          China has harshly responded to groundless accusations
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 29 March 2018 08: 46
            0
            A wise monkey gets down from its tree when the fire will begin to be made under its tree.
            In other matters, can I be wrong? Can she and for the whole grove have care? They are eastern people, who understand them, they did not teach us in Confucius.
            1. LSA57
              LSA57 29 March 2018 08: 50
              +1
              Quote: rocket757
              Can she and for the whole grove have care?

              they prefer to deal with Russia now. the enemy is one, striped
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 29 March 2018 11: 25
                0
                I would answer by Confucius, for sure there is how and what to answer for! But he didn’t study, so he jumped on top! But Li Bo is well acquainted with me:
                Emperor troops
                Sends to the north of the desert

                So that the enemies do not threaten
                Water horses in our rivers.

                How many battles are ahead of us
                And how many were there until now, -

                But our love for the motherland
                Stronger and stronger.
                1. LSA57
                  LSA57 29 March 2018 11: 30
                  0
                  Quote: rocket757
                  But our love for the motherland
                  Stronger and stronger.

                  because of love, they are friends with us. we do not threaten them, anything can be expected from the striped.
                  1. rocket757
                    rocket757 29 March 2018 12: 25
                    +1
                    I also highlight these lines.
                    They will eat them in parts, so partnership is ensured for the time of the common threat!
                    And then ... when it comes later, then our descendants will think!
                    1. LSA57
                      LSA57 29 March 2018 12: 34
                      +1
                      Quote: rocket757
                      They will eat them in parts, so partnership is ensured for the time of the common threat!

                      this is what I wanted to say
                      And then ... when it comes later, then our descendants will think!

                      hurt we made them
              2. Piramidon
                Piramidon 29 March 2018 11: 31
                +5
                Quote: LSA57
                they prefer to deal with Russia now. the enemy is one, striped

                Not true, the "whole world" is against us. lol
                1. LSA57
                  LSA57 29 March 2018 11: 41
                  0
                  Quote: Piramidon
                  Not true, the "whole world" is against us.

                  well you showed it in the afternoon. I’ll forget until evening. and so I would not fall asleep before morning laughing
                2. freejack
                  freejack 29 March 2018 12: 33
                  0
                  But did Canada and Australia really expel diplomats? ... They, of course, are the closest ally of the states, but sluggishly supported the sanctions ... True, Canada keeps its instructors on the outskirts ... it is correct that they marked them with black ... I apologize!)) hi
                  1. Piramidon
                    Piramidon 29 March 2018 12: 44
                    0
                    Quote: freejack
                    Did Canada and Australia expel diplomats?

                    Yes, I’m not talking about diplomats, but about “all-rivals”.
                    1. freejack
                      freejack 29 March 2018 13: 16
                      0
                      I have already recovered ... repeat
          2. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 29 March 2018 10: 35
            +3
            Quote: LSA57
            Quote: Chertt
            There are many true, equal and profitable partners.

            China has harshly responded to groundless accusations

            And Austria also sent them to the forest. In general, 160 countries decided to wait for the real facts and evidence from Britain, ignoring its unfounded accusations against Russia.
        3. Topotun
          Topotun 29 March 2018 09: 58
          +2
          There is one more point here - Russia has EVERYTHING necessary for a normal life and development. Well, why are we stubbornly trying to stay in line with dependence on certain supplies of the West? Can start to seriously invest in their own country? However, the rhetorical question ...
          1. LSA57
            LSA57 29 March 2018 10: 48
            0
            Quote: Topotun
            There is one more point here - Russia has EVERYTHING necessary for a normal life and development. Well, why are we stubbornly trying to stay in line with dependence on certain supplies of the West?

            too tied up. not all can still produce ourselves. but the matter, though slowly, is moving
      3. sgazeev
        sgazeev 29 March 2018 09: 54
        +1
        Quote: Herkulesich
        There, only England is very va-nya-et, the rest are more adequate, a little more brains, but there is no courage and desire to tell the truth!

    2. Finches
      Finches 29 March 2018 06: 23
      +11
      The West must understand that for every dead head (without brains), we always have a dead hand ....
      1. Ascetic
        Ascetic 29 March 2018 08: 14
        +11
        Quote: Finches
        The West must understand that for every dead head (without brains), we always have a dead hand ....


        There was a very interesting remark by Putin at a meeting with the Valdai club. There someone says to him: "You can destroy the United States in about half an hour." But Putin thought and thought and answered: “Actually, faster.”
        1. LSA57
          LSA57 29 March 2018 08: 53
          0
          Quote: Ascetic
          There was a very interesting remark by Putin at a meeting with the Valdai club. There someone says to him: "You can destroy the United States in about half an hour." But Putin thought and thought and answered: “Actually, faster.”

          I also liked the other. I do not remember literally, but the meaning is this. the west can destroy Russia, he replied, why then do we need land without Russia?
          Well, something like this
    3. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 29 March 2018 07: 54
      +5
      Let the Britons not forget that they are an island nation ... Poseidon can appear from any direction. Washes off a bunch of ... islands like r in the toilet.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 29 March 2018 08: 41
        +3
        I do not agree that the arrogant Saxons all instigators! Yes, yes, but they smelled a smelly barrel from there, from across the ocean! The rest is so, nose downwind! Just some of the process in ecstasy, and some with a clothespin on the nose!
        And let the "Perimeter" be on the alert, not in vain we did it! Did GOOD, RELIABLE!
        1. Esso
          Esso 29 March 2018 09: 25
          +5
          the perimeter is not susceptible to cyber attacks, it is an isolated system. These are bunkers with computers, they are not connected to external systems, all information is connected to hundreds, if not thousands of sensors.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 29 March 2018 09: 42
            +1
            This is not the internet. But this is a network. And you can enter any network and hack it,
            if you enter one of her computers.
            Iranian nuclear centrifuges were also not connected to the Internet.
            Only on the internal network. But they were hacked without much difficulty.
            1. PV KGB of the USSR
              PV KGB of the USSR 29 March 2018 09: 59
              +5
              If they hack, then someone on a foggy island and overseas on this day is not lucky. wink I think the protection against hacking is thought out and if there are attempts, then everything, as they say, started! If you enter the code incorrectly more than three times, the ATM takes away the card, but what the Perimeter system does is we can only guess. laughing It’s the same as cutting a shell with a grinder.
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 29 March 2018 10: 59
                +2
                "makes the system" perimeter "we can only guess" ///

                If it exists at all ... There was, as it were, a "command" rocket,
                which on takeoff gives commands to everyone else: "we were attacked! take off!"
                But this is unreliable.
                Or really there are only rockets underground with radioactivity sensors:
                caught the radiation - means: "the enemy hit. We respond."
                Then there is no network.
                1. sharp-lad
                  sharp-lad 29 March 2018 17: 49
                  0
                  There is not only a command missile, there are procedures for launching missiles at predetermined goals in the absence of communication with the control center for a certain time. I think that there are launch systems in the absence of personnel.
            2. zoolu350
              zoolu350 29 March 2018 10: 49
              +2
              Hack the "Perimeter", but remember, suddenly there are a couple of flight missions to Israel there, then there will be no one to howl.
              1. Xnumx vis
                Xnumx vis 29 March 2018 11: 12
                +1
                Wai Mae ! Oh me! ... let them howl. they mastered it perfectly ... Howl and lamentations ...
              2. rocket757
                rocket757 29 March 2018 11: 34
                +1
                Gee, gee, he is native ... he turned off one mud - muda - tagged, schaub to him !!! Included!
                The soaring "signal" rocket is one of the channels \ sources ..., .... function!
                Hack? A cast iron filled with hot coals how to turn it off ??? Pull it out of the socket? I warn you, there is no water nearby and everyone’s urinary system is empty!
            3. sharp-lad
              sharp-lad 29 March 2018 17: 31
              0
              They were not hacked, but a well-developed virus was planted. The system was only partially "closed", someone from the staff connected their computer with the infection. hi
            4. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 29 March 2018 18: 01
              0
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Iranian nuclear centrifuges were also not connected to the Internet.
              Only on the internal network. But they were hacked without much difficulty.

              The small thing is to find a computer in the control system of the Strategic Missile Forces (not in the control system, namely in the system that is responsible for sending commands and for launching it) into which a flash drive can be inserted (or at least one computer compatible with anything). smile
              It’s the same as trying to hack the lamp control system of the S-125 air defense system. The latter will be even simpler - there are at least transistor assemblies. laughing
            5. Hiller
              Hiller 29 March 2018 20: 33
              +2
              Do not enter and do not hack ... this is not a network ... but an isolated command system .. a flash drive cannot be inserted like in Iran ... nowhere ...
  2. Wolka
    Wolka 29 March 2018 06: 12
    +3
    partly happy, and the memory of the agglomerated began to return
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 29 March 2018 06: 13
    +1
    When the English tattered cat has nothing to do, she angrily growls and spits in the direction of Russia! No matter how they choke on their saliva from anger! Or even vice versa, let them choke on their saliva and choke on it! !!
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 29 March 2018 06: 50
      +3
      Quote: Herkulesich
      When the English tattered cat has nothing to do, she angrily growls and spits in the direction of Russia!

      Well, what a shame. were Great Britain, became FINE. this proves the emergence in the power of such insignificants as the cutter and the fight
  4. wandlitz
    wandlitz 29 March 2018 06: 13
    +2
    Bruce Blair says the Perimeter could be “vulnerable to cyber attacks,”
    Let him try to “hurt”, as if he himself didn’t have to wash his pants then ....
    1. Ushly_bashkort
      Ushly_bashkort 29 March 2018 08: 55
      +1
      This is to ensure that Russia needs to take away and divide nuclear weapons between respected and unconditionally safe countries. Well-intentioned of course.
  5. Moore
    Moore 29 March 2018 06: 22
    +11
    At the same time, Bruce Blair claims that the “Perimeter” may be “vulnerable to cyber attacks,” and therefore “threatens the entire system of international security.”

    In the head of the Anglo-Saxon can not fit the idea that automatic combat control systems do not have access to external networks?
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 29 March 2018 06: 52
      +1
      Quote: Moore
      Anglo-Saxon's head cannot fit a thought

      they all know. But not all. that's what they put into their heads
    2. Felix99
      Felix99 29 March 2018 08: 16
      +6


      I wonder how this subject is “vulnerable to cyber attacks,” and therefore “threatens the entire system of international security”?
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 29 March 2018 08: 56
        +3
        Quote: Felix99
        I wonder how this subject is “vulnerable to cyber attacks”

        reliable. but for defense. and this is for the answer. also reliable lol
        1. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 29 March 2018 18: 03
          0
          It is better to use this instrument, both historical, and folk, and traditional, and recognizable. laughing
          Ciston in person.
          1. Felix99
            Felix99 30 March 2018 17: 41
            +1
            Hi Litvin! The Germans have a more romantic name for this item - Morgenstern, in Russian, Morning Star!
            1. sharp-lad
              sharp-lad April 4 2018 20: 37
              0
              I do not know how the Germans wink , and his earlobes felt comfortable in his bosom.
  6. Vard
    Vard 29 March 2018 06: 29
    +6
    At the end of the seventies, they were on duty in a bunker at a depth of fifty meters ... now this is the territory of Ukraine ... There were two sensors ... seismic and gamma radiation ... and a button ... Next was the Strategic Missile Forces division ... that's the whole dead hand ... and no internet ...
    1. PV KGB of the USSR
      PV KGB of the USSR 29 March 2018 10: 07
      +1
      The main thing is that everything works flawlessly
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 29 March 2018 15: 13
      0
      This is more like the truth than some
      automatic autonomous working system.
  7. Sergey985
    Sergey985 29 March 2018 06: 34
    +5
    Hmm, kindergarten. You type in Google the "perimeter", but you turn off the entire nuclear triad of Russia. And how has nobody thought of such a simple thought? wassat
    1. Felix99
      Felix99 29 March 2018 08: 20
      +2
      Not everything is so simple, there is no suitable team in Google, you need to use Yandex. In general, everything was invented by Microsoft, three buttons at the same time, Contral, Alt, Del.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 29 March 2018 18: 05
        +1
        Quote: Felix99
        In general, everything was invented by Microsoft, three buttons at the same time, Contral, Alt, Del.

        FORMAT C: / q smile
  8. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 29 March 2018 06: 47
    +1
    He just didn’t fantasize - "As a result of launching the Perimeter system, 3 land areas will disappear from the Earth map: North America, Great Britain, Australia."
    1. Senior manager
      Senior manager 29 March 2018 07: 18
      +1
      Australia for what? Missed what?
      1. Ushly_bashkort
        Ushly_bashkort 29 March 2018 09: 00
        +1
        For company! Why are they walking upside down ?!
        1. Felix99
          Felix99 29 March 2018 12: 48
          0
          The issue with Australia is solved simply: It is necessary at the UN to recognize the land as flat.
      2. zulusuluz
        zulusuluz 29 March 2018 21: 48
        0
        So this is the first of the colonies of England!
  9. Proton
    Proton 29 March 2018 07: 04
    +1
    I remembered correctly, otherwise, instead of the rule of Britain by the seas, Britain will sleep under the waters laughing
    A dead hand reaches everywhere.
  10. den3080
    den3080 29 March 2018 07: 13
    +4
    The "dead hand" is controlled by a mechanical system of levers and balances, you can try to put the computer between the gears, of course, if you can penetrate whether such a cyber attack is effective.
    laughing
    Western delirium is already boring to read, a huge crowd of experts, experts who just need to come up with something else will have nothing to eat, so they grind ... the kids for milk and their own oatmeal for breakfast.
  11. Sergey D_2
    Sergey D_2 29 March 2018 07: 24
    0
    All its history, Russia looked at England, revealing a mitt. The exception, perhaps, was the time of Alexander 1.
  12. jovanni
    jovanni 29 March 2018 07: 42
    +1
    According to him, the presence of such a system in Russia makes it clear to the West that the very "idea of ​​a nuclear attack is bad, and it’s worth thinking twice."

    Yes, than rushing with desperate anger at Russia, it is better to think once, but well, right away. If you don’t think of it the first time, the second possibility may not be given ...
  13. AlexS
    AlexS 29 March 2018 07: 52
    +1
    Britain, with its cannibalistic logic, decided once again to complain and reproach the bad Russians who are ready to defend themselves and to strike specifically, and not to surrender to the grace of the "higher race" ...
  14. Observer2014
    Observer2014 29 March 2018 08: 11
    0
    At the same time, Bruce Blair states that the “Perimeter” may be “vulnerable to cyber attacks,”
    fool And not an expert. And in general, what is there to be surprised if there are such EXPERTS.
  15. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 29 March 2018 08: 31
    +1
    that's interesting, but if we raise the price of gas for them, well, or will we turn off the gas altogether next winter? It is clear that this will be to their own detriment, but still what will they sing? Americans, with all their desire, will not feed Europe with their gas carriers, Norwegian will not be enough, and in the event of a real gas collapse, everything will become Europe's industry.
  16. pvv113
    pvv113 29 March 2018 08: 35
    0
    the presence of such a system in Russia makes it clear to the West that the very "idea of ​​a nuclear attack is bad, and it’s worth thinking twice"

    That is, thanks to the "Perimeter" the Anglo-Saxons have to include thoughtful reflexes
    1. Felix99
      Felix99 30 March 2018 17: 44
      +1
      There is one gyrus, and that one is covered with cowards and sandwiched with rolls.
  17. Gray brother
    Gray brother 29 March 2018 08: 49
    +2
    Bruce Blair says the Perimeter could be “vulnerable to cyber attacks,”

    Another [a sick person on his head] drew.
    Programs washed down at the hardware level are generally impossible to crack.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 29 March 2018 18: 11
      0
      Can! With the help of scrap and someone's mother, but who will let it go! laughing
  18. KCA
    KCA 29 March 2018 08: 52
    +2
    They are interesting, the British, think that the "Perimeter" works through the Internet and is controlled by Windows 95, therefore it is defenseless against cyber attacks, you do not need to judge the control systems of your probable enemy by the control systems of your warships, comrades
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 29 March 2018 08: 58
      +1
      Quote: KCA
      They are interesting, the British, think that the "Perimeter" works through the Internet and is controlled by Windows 95,

      I'm sticking out of this too smile
  19. CooL_SnipeR
    CooL_SnipeR 29 March 2018 09: 05
    0
    “Vulnerable to cyber attacks”
    Well, yes, they will lay the cable and hack laughing
  20. sleeve
    sleeve 29 March 2018 09: 17
    +2
    What are rams? There is an independent autonomous communication system. She was "sculpted" when they talked about ovskie warriors about the Internet to wives under the covers. I would not be surprised if mechanical adjustments are used there at all. Cyberattacks.
  21. sleeve
    sleeve 29 March 2018 09: 18
    0
    Can they be signed to IN? Well, satire is just daily.
  22. Old26
    Old26 29 March 2018 11: 36
    +1
    Quote: voyaka uh
    "makes the system" perimeter "we can only guess" ///

    If it exists at all ... There was, as it were, a "command" rocket,
    which on takeoff gives commands to everyone else: "we were attacked! take off!"
    But this is unreliable.
    Or really there are only rockets underground with radioactivity sensors:
    caught the radiation - means: "the enemy hit. We respond."
    Then there is no network.

    Fortunately, no one knows what this system is. And this is good. The more uncertainty and rumors, the less likely it is that someone will blow the roof and he "press the button." When you don’t know what this system will react to, you’ll think 100 times
    With a 100% guarantee, only two things are known.
    1. The system exists
    2. One component is command missiles
    And then - a continuous fog. Like in London ... laughing

    Quote: zoolu350
    Hack the "Perimeter", but remember, suddenly there are a couple of flight missions to Israel there, then there will be no one to howl.

    Flight missions on Israel in command missiles that have no warheads ??? I’m embarrassed to ask why ...
  23. Vanek
    Vanek 29 March 2018 14: 06
    +4
    "Perimeter" is the brainchild of the USSR. "Perimeter" on the lamps. "Perimeter" wanted to spit on hackers.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 29 March 2018 18: 19
      +1
      Poor you think about the Union. I myself worked at a factory that produced transistors and microcircuits of small integration for the military, space, nuclear energy, and other civilian industries. And the products were issued using industrial robotic machines, and even equipped with industrial vision systems!
      1. Vanek
        Vanek 30 March 2018 07: 08
        +1
        Quote: sharp-lad
        Poor you think about the Union.


        No way! I was born in it.

        ... for some reason I remembered the story behind the sledgehammer.

        hi
  24. rehev931
    rehev931 29 March 2018 19: 55
    +1
    why do we need a world without Russia? without Russia we do not need the world !!!
  25. Hiller
    Hiller 29 March 2018 20: 39
    +2
    a cyber attack on the "Perimeter" ??? ... dolbo ... woodpeckers .... no dreamers can come close to it .. "implicated in other yeast" ... let them guess ..