Media: US Congress banned the supply of military assistance to neo-Nazis from Azov

27
The US Budget Law, which provides for millions of dollars in military aid for Ukraine, prohibits any weapons or preparation of the Ukrainian regiment of the National Guard "Azov", writes the Ukrainian edition of LB.ua with reference to the American edition of The Hill.

Media: US Congress banned the supply of military assistance to neo-Nazis from Azov




The spending bills adopted in the last three years included a ban on US military assistance being sent to the Azov regiment, but this provision was usually removed before final approval, the newspaper notes. However, the current US budget bill provides that no funds provided under this act can be used to provide weapons, training, or other assistance to Azov.

White supremacy and neo-Nazism are unacceptable and have no place in our world. And I am very pleased that the adopted bill does not allow the US to provide weapons and assistance in the preparation of the neo-Nazi battalion "Azov" fighting in Ukraine
- declared the American congressmen Roh Khanna.

The publication notes that it is not known whether Azov received American assistance earlier. At the beginning of 2018, the press service of the National Guard stated that there were no lethal weapons (ATGMs and grenade launchers) of American production in the 3057 unit, which includes Azov, no.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    28 March 2018 13: 19
    This ban will soon be a year, no less ... Although I have no doubt, these hoopoes will get everything they want
    1. +3
      28 March 2018 13: 23
      Receive not directly, but through a chain of intermediaries. That's all.
      There are plenty of those wishing to "get enough" in this matter. A "Americans", like otmazyvatsya.
      But it is characteristic that they nevertheless recognize the existence of neo-Nazis in Ukraine. And at the same time they are doing everything to cover them, since they have brought to power those who please Washington.
      1. +7
        28 March 2018 13: 38
        That bad luck, igil - it is possible, al-Qaida - it is possible, dushmanam- it is possible, but Khokhloazov can not? I really believe the Yankees, I can’t! Why are you lads kidding? am
      2. 0
        28 March 2018 20: 11
        Quote: x.andvlad
        Receive not directly, but through a chain of intermediaries. That's all.

        Yes, everything will be much simpler - the Natsiks from Azov will come to any part of the Armed Forces and simply disarm them, take what they need.
    2. +4
      28 March 2018 13: 24
      I do not believe. It simply cannot be that the Yankees and the defenders of democracy are forbidden to supply weapons. Come, there they breathed something in their congress. Another State Department PR.
    3. +7
      28 March 2018 13: 35
      Media: US Congress banned the supply of military assistance to neo-Nazis from Azov

      Transfusion from empty to empty, just the same way the stripes “don’t” supply the barmales in Syria, and here they deliver it by roundabouts.
      1. +5
        28 March 2018 13: 42
        Another tale of the Vienna forest. What is stopping these supplies through the diaspora in Canada?
    4. 0
      28 March 2018 20: 33
      Phew, you sigh calmly! Sleep Donetsk residents ... Do not take people for idiots!
  2. +5
    28 March 2018 13: 19
    And who will ensure that it does not get from the APU to the National Bats? For each rifle and javelin, an American inspector will be given?
  3. +6
    28 March 2018 13: 19
    And who is there to check where the Nazis got their weapons from? angry
    1. +7
      28 March 2018 13: 35
      Nobody will check, moreover, the newest will go to the most reliable parts in the sense of Russophobia. A formal ban is nothing more than a piece of paper that will be erased in Ukraine and hidden in the USA, if that .. Both suppliers and consumers understand everything ..
      1. +3
        28 March 2018 13: 38
        KVU-NSVD (Victor) Today, 13: 35A formal ban is nothing more than a piece of paper to be erased in Ukraine, and in the US they’ll hide if that .. Both suppliers and consumers understand everything ..

        In fact, the way it is. The mericatos will be white and fluffy.
  4. +1
    28 March 2018 13: 23
    And what will it change?
  5. BAI
    +1
    28 March 2018 13: 29
    After the weapon arrives in Ukraine, it will be distributed there without taking into account American laws.
  6. +1
    28 March 2018 13: 29
    Funny ban. Pure PR for the liberda. Even an idiot understands that it is impossible to exclude getting to these freaks what UkrAina received.
  7. +2
    28 March 2018 13: 31
    It’s a strange prohibition if in Azov haute couture equipment, camouflage individually sewn for 70 thousand rubles by us, Italian sneakers for 19 thousand rubles and trekking boots for 18-37 thousand rubles. In addition, any small arms and the latest Russian A-103 type assault rifles are in service. Maybe there they decided to ban the junk from delivering? Maybe simple Swiss military watches were forbidden to be delivered for 10-30 thousand, and immediately Tag Hauer for 300-500? laughing hi
    1. 0
      28 March 2018 14: 09
      Well, do not prohibit now respected people from making money !!! To whom is war, and to whom is mother dear ...
  8. +1
    28 March 2018 13: 32
    Quote:
    US Congress bans the supply of military assistance to neo-Nazis from Azov

    stop No, not like that! US Congress AGAIN banned the supply of military assistance to neo-Nazis from Azov. Yes
  9. +1
    28 March 2018 13: 33
    Quote: Borik
    I do not believe. It simply cannot be that the Yankees and the defenders of democracy are forbidden to supply weapons. Come, there they breathed something in their congress.

    --------------------------
    So I don’t believe that the lovingly grown bees cut off the supply of honey. laughing
  10. +1
    28 March 2018 13: 45
    Well, of course, straight from hand to hand nizya, because aiding is obtained.
  11. +1
    28 March 2018 13: 49
    At "Azov" and so on in abundance.
  12. +1
    28 March 2018 14: 26
    "Azov" is legalized by the ukronazi authorities. It’s just interesting how the USA would control - from whose hands the “javelin” was shot? Dust in the eyes of those who have noticed and are not satisfied with the fact that Ukrainian authorities use the services of the Nazis. None of the Anglo-Saxons will control this, while some Slavs kill others from Amer’s weapons, even if there will be a unit of devil worshipers among the APU.
  13. 0
    28 March 2018 14: 33
    Shaw, again? The State Department said that there are no Nazis or Natsiks, some intellectuals and honest, decent people :(
  14. 0
    28 March 2018 16: 56
    White supremacy and neo-Nazism are unacceptable and have no place in our world.

    Yes, this is all built in the United States, it turns out this with a gang of runaway bandits does not have a place in our world.
  15. 0
    28 March 2018 20: 14
    I rephrase. Directly they banned and so .... through third parties will be handed over.
  16. +1
    28 March 2018 20: 24
    Of course, but we believed .... wipe this ban ... then they will swing this piece of paper at the UN
  17. 0
    28 March 2018 22: 21
    Azov is not the only group.
    And the ban is most likely connected with the internal political situation in Ukraine. It's just that the Americans are showing which side they are in in the future struggle for the presidency.