US Permanent Representative to the UN: We are ready for new actions in Syria

US Permanent Representative to the UN Nikki Haley announced the readiness of the United States to "new actions in Syria." Recall that earlier, Washington declared that the main goal for him in the SAR is "the destruction of ISIS (* terrorist group banned in the Russian Federation).

Now, when the ISIL grouping * is actually crushed, in her statement, Hayley once again touched upon the subject of chemical weapons.

RIA News cites a statement by the US Permanent Representative to the UN:

We also warn any country that wants to impose its will through chemical attacks and unbearable suffering, especially the Syrian regime: the United States is still ready to act if necessary. This is not the path that we prefer, but it is the path that, as we have shown, we will choose. And we are ready to re-select it.

In fact, Hayley exposes a plan for further American action. It looks like this: a new provocation using (or supposedly using) chemical weapons - laying the blame on government forces - attacking the Syrian army by the American coalition.

According to Ms. Haley, the United States previously conducted a "successful attack on the Shairat air base of the Syrian air force, from which Khan-Sheikhun was attacked with chemical munitions, since then the UN Security Council could not make the right decision."

Expect a new “Powell tube”?

Comments

[izya top]

The UN Security Council could not make the right decision. "

the stupid the Yankees, the more openly they express themselves.

[dik-nsk]

but this is the path that, as we have shown, we will choose. And we are ready to select it again

yes yes we know again shake your way with a test tube

[Chertt]

After Putin’s speech, Russia will have to answer with the same coin in response to the US military operations against the Syrian Army, to sit aside, as when attacking Shairat air base

[dik-nsk]

I am against the conflict, of course, but you are right to include the “back” and express concern - face loss ..

[Chertt]

Quote: dik-nsk

I am against the conflict, of course

All against. It's like with the Ostrogradsky-Gauss theorem, everything is against, but it is

Quote: dik-nsk

turn on the back and express concern - loss of face ..

You are very gently put it

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: Chertt

After Putin’s speech, Russia will have to respond with the same coin in response to US military operations against the Syrian Army

And what, in fact, has changed “after Putin’s speech”?

[Chertt]

Quote: Golovan Jack

And what, in fact, has changed “after Putin’s speech”?

As they used to joke, "gentlemen deputies do not sleep (s)" There is nothing there, come back :

[Golovan Jack]

Translate, maybe? I didn’t understand anything ... like about

Quote: Chertt

After Putin’s speech ...

Do you ... understand?

[Alex-a832]

Quote: Chertt

After Putin’s speech, Russia will have to answer with the same coin in response to the US military operations against the Syrian Army, to sit aside, as when attacking Shairat air base

You're wrong. Putin’s speech was to contain the dashing western brotherhood, which convinced each other that everything was possible against Russia, they could cope with the answer. But, as follows from this speech, these were wet dreams ... Only direct aggression against us can lead to a military response, and then circumstances will matter. Russia plays complex games, stretched over time, the result of which is visible in months and years, but these are serious results. Our “partners” are unaccustomed to play like that, so they are mired in a momentary lie that is already reaching critical mass and will soon cease to be absorbed by the target audience, which Russia is very contributing to. The goal is to defeat the enemy by not taking the saber out of its scabbard and preventing it from doing so.

[Chertt]

Although I do not see fundamental differences, in our points of view, I do not agree with some statements

Quote: Alex-a832

Only direct aggression against us can lead to a military response, and circumstances will matter.

An open attack on the army of our ally is a direct aggression against Russia.

Quote: Alex-a832

The goal is to defeat the enemy by not taking the saber out of its scabbard and preventing it from doing so.

The goal is good, but as you yourself have noticed.

Quote: Alex-a832

Our “partners” have lost the habit of playing like that, so they’re mired in a momentary lie,

And quite predictably, there will come such a moment when they are completely confused, they will have a choice, hit or completely lose any influence. And what the "Western partners" will choose, the question

[Dashout]

Quote: Chertt

An open blow to the army of our ally, this is a direct aggression against Russia

I think that this will not be the only blow ... It will break out in Ukraine ... and perhaps somewhere else in the south ...
As already noted in another post - it is necessary to transfer the economy to mobilization rails, prepare the rear ... It seems that it just does not resolve!

[Chertt]

Quote: Dashout

it is necessary to transfer the economy to mobilization rails, to prepare the rear ..

This is already happening. Not by such methods and pace as in the 30s of the twentieth century. But the process of mobilization and self-sufficiency is ongoing

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: Chertt

An open blow to the army of our ally, this is a direct aggression against Russia

And with what, in fact, is Syria’s fear “our ally”?
So with "direct aggression" you ... went too far, IMHO.

[Chertt]

Quote: Golovan Jack

And with what, in fact, is Syria’s fear “our ally”?

I don’t know if there is a signed agreement, but the President and the Government of the SAR officially asked for military-political assistance from Russia. The President of the Russian Federation agreed, the State Duma gave permission to conduct a military operation. In essence, this is an allied relationship.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: Chertt

I don’t know if there is a signed contract

About mutual assistance? No.

Quote: Chertt

But the President and Government of the SAR, officially asked for military-political assistance from Russia

In the fight against ISIS (may it not be named)? At least that's how it was presented in the press.

Quote: Chertt

Of Russia. The President of the Russian Federation agreed, the State Duma gave permission to conduct a military operation ...

Against the same ISIS?

Quote: Chertt

This is essentially an allied relationship.

Well, I don’t even zngaaaaaa
IMHO everything will be as it was.
Neither Amerts are openly opposed to the Russian Federation, nor vice versa - they will not speak.
"Bite" each other stealthily - continue ... in the same mode.
Why do you like the speech of Putin, ahem, annoyed - I still do not understand.
Thank you

[Chertt]

Quote: Golovan Jack

Why do you like the speech of Putin, ahem, annoyed - I still do not understand.

Did you get that impression ?, or are you kidding again I liked the speech. I consider it to be as significant as the Munich one in 07 ... Yes, you joke, but I am ingenuously caught

[Andrey Yuryevich]

US Permanent Representative to the UN: We are ready for new actions in Syria

everyone is there ... a statement for the sake of a statement.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: iza top

The UN Security Council could not make the right decision. "

the stupid the Yankees, the more openly they express themselves.

If you recall a very recent story - just five seconds ago - it turns out that she, history, made a circle and returned to the same with which Syria generally began. Only if then it began as a tragedy, now, in full accordance with the law of the cyclical nature of history, a farce is unfolding. Then there were severed heads, ISIS, etc. Now - shadow boxing. Without quotes. Not in the boxing sense, but in the direct sense - to kick an enemy created from the air.
But what do they think there at the Pentagon - do we have "Caliber" over? We, fucking ISIS, ran out of steam and now calmly let the eggheads fulfill their dream - to assassinate? It’s interesting - do they plan to hang him like Saddam or let their door-keepers tear him to pieces, like Gaddafi?
Well, as children, I swear .....
Yes, I forgot !!!! In the third round, history repeats itself as a comedy ..... We'll wait and have a laugh .....

[72jora72]

Expect a new “Powell tube”?

I think by March 18 they had come up with some kind of muck, here Volcker was also plotting for Ukraine, most likely bloody provocations were also planned in the Donbass.

[Evil543]

Quote: 72jora72

Expect a new “Powell tube”?

I think by March 18 they had come up with some kind of muck, here Volcker was also plotting for Ukraine, most likely bloody provocations were also planned in the Donbass.

Already, together with the British, they announced that Russia was to blame for the poisoning of this smuggler, as he ... Well, they understood ..
And after that, somewhere in America, Rodchenkov’s point shrank to unimaginable sizes.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Evil543

And after that, somewhere in America, Rodchenkov’s point shrank to unimaginable sizes.

God forbid - matter, squeezed to an inconceivable size, has an inconceivable force of gravity (remember the "black holes" in space). Imagine if the whole of America gets involved .... Well, you understand where ...

[mvg]

You have beguiled something ... What does the KGB defector and WADA have to do with it. Rodchenkoff is a sport, and a bit of politics. If you "extinguish" everyone, then you can end up in complete w .. isolation.
We are already on the verge of a second Afghanistan .. Nothing good. The USSR failed, great and powerful, and here Russia is not strong

[Evil543]

Both there and there are betrayal of the country.

[Glory1974]

The USSR failed, great and powerful, and here Russia is not strong

As Bush Sr. said: "You are in vain rejoicing at the collapse of the USSR. Russia threw off weights in the form of the Transcaucasian and Central Asian republics and has only become stronger."

[Vita vko]

With OM like chlorine, everything is clear, it can be typed at any treatment plant, which the terrorists did. But there were other toxic substances! Even if the units of the OPCW do not want to investigate, there are also their own units. It is clear that in the West they will not trust them, but it is quite possible to establish suppliers and take measures to them on their own.
In addition, now the United States is the only country in MIE that has not destroyed chemical weapons, although it has signed an agreement banning it. Why is the UN silent about this? After all, this is a clear violation of both international and American law itself.

[ALEXANDER ABDRAKHMANOV_2]

For Americans, the law is not written - it is written for other countries, so that others are destroyed, and our chemical weapons should not be touched. The most contagious country in the world, they have already proven this in practice. Disarm all, just not us, they have no laws for themselves.

[Mountain shooter]

Rhetoric. The Yankees are scared and confused. Threats are mainly in words. SAA smashes barmalei in Eastern Ghouta. This is a completely different army than three or four years ago. And while the slurred situation with the Kurds, and the difficult situation of the barmaley in the south. Something for a long time there were no attempts to bomb the SAA.
Well, chemical weapons are simply an EXPRESS calculation of public opinion. The use of chemical weapons CAA has no military meaning.

[samarin1969]

Haley is working on information legitimization of future attacks on airfields in Syria. France, England have already expressed their readiness to support an ally. ... They can also come up with something radical - to attack the Syrian Air Force.
"RF" traditionally does not dare to oppose.
ps At the same time, a hint of Turkey, so as not to rely on agreements with the Russian Federation.

[rocket757]

Interesting to see! It’s just scary, like if you have to see it!

[zulusuluz]

We also warn any country that wants to impose its will through chemical attacks.

And bomb yourself? The contract is not fulfilled ...

[ALEXANDER ABDRAKHMANOV_2]

The Americans have all the operations - according to one scenario, the most important chemical weapon that they themselves deliver to terrorists. They forgot Putin’s report - an attack on an ally, this is like declaring war on Russia, the consequences will follow. They all think that V. Putin is joking, he just said that, they are very mistaken. Volodya had already stamped hyper missiles, enough for the opponents, and still will be for minor conflicts. He is not that person - whatever this demon does not see.

[rotmistr60]

... through chemical attacks and unbearable suffering,

It’s ridiculous. Since when is a country comparing whole cities to the land preoccupied with "unbearable suffering"? It is clear that American fosterlings are being nullified, and the main sponsor of the bloodshed is not to their liking.

[rocket757]

Stupid, not stupid, they will spoil while they all can and cannot be torn off!

[Hariton laptev]

Well, we’ll carry out exercises in the Mediterranean Sea with shooting, and we will work out the floor skills in practical exercises.