"Russian Helicopters" reported on state tests Mi-28НМ

32
The upgraded attack helicopter "Night Hunter" Mi-28HM is undergoing state tests, said Andrei Boginsky, general director of the Russian Helicopters holding company (Rostec), in an interview with Interfax.

We have in the forefront of Milevskaya theme - Mi-28. Now we are carrying out development work on the Mi-28HM. We have already entered the state joint tests; last year our helicopters handed over
- declared Boginsky.



"Russian Helicopters" reported on state tests Mi-28НМ


In December, the 2017 of the year in the Ministry of Defense of Russia announced the conclusion of a contract for the supply of Mi-28HM.

We decided that further contracting of the "twenty-eighth" vehicles will be conducted in favor of the Mi-28HM
- said earlier Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov

According to the state contract with the "Helicopters of Russia" for the production of the installation batch, the first two Mi-28НМ will be manufactured before the end of 2018 of the year.

The helicopter received a laser on-board defense system and a new weapons control system, which allows the use of new types aviation weapons with radar and laser guidance systems at long distances
- noted Borisov.

The car acquired a modified fuselage, upgraded engines, an onboard complex of electronic equipment and a sight-sight system, a new auxiliary power unit, communications equipment with unmanned aerial vehicles.
- said the deputy minister of defense.

The attack helicopter Mi-28HM is the latest modification of the Mi-28Н "Night Hunter". Work on the new version of the helicopter began in 2009 year.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    15 February 2018 12: 54
    Everything is fine ... but the latest development ... since 2009 ... we have been harnessing something for a long time ...
    1. +8
      15 February 2018 12: 57
      Quote: Vard
      harness something for a long time ...

      The shortcomings were "above the roof"! Now they put a lot of new things inside, but there’s nothing to fix the shortcomings. What about the helmet? Corrected? His pilots call the "killer" ...
      1. +3
        15 February 2018 13: 00
        Sanya, hi! hi
        Quote: Logall
        The shortcomings were "above the roof"!

        That's for sure . I really hope that childhood diseases are successfully cured.
        1. +3
          15 February 2018 13: 02
          Hi Paul!
          If only
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          "childhood diseases
          in chronic did not outgrow!
          1. +3
            15 February 2018 13: 07
            I’m talking about that. I remember how many copies were broken on the problem of the main gearbox.
            1. +3
              15 February 2018 13: 10
              Quote: bouncyhunter
              on the problem of the main gearbox.

              Or maybe the problem is that they make it with spears?
              Quote: bouncyhunter
              I remember how many copies were broken

              Where are the special tools? tongue laughing laughing laughing bully hi
              1. +3
                15 February 2018 13: 14
                I appreciate your joke, but I remember that with the help of a sledgehammer, a file and some kind of mother, Russians can do everything. tongue lol lol drinks
                1. +3
                  15 February 2018 13: 25
                  Quote: bouncyhunter
                  With the help of a sledgehammer, a file and some kind of mother there, Russians can do everything.

                  Notice, not a word about the spear!
                  But there is a joke in which the Americans assembled our plane, according to our own drawings, but it turned out to be a tank. And they did not realize that this model needed to be finalized with a file ... drinks
                  The Americans - have a clue ... What am I talking about? what
                  1. +4
                    15 February 2018 13: 34
                    Quote: Logall
                    The Americans - have a clue ... What am I talking about?

                    Well done: he noticed that he made a mistake! lol And about the joke: so there was such a version that the drawings of the mattress were stolen, and 10 volumes of revision were forgotten. That’s why the tank turned out. wassat
      2. +1
        15 February 2018 14: 04
        There is information, though not officially confirmed, that this problem was transferred to ... a little later. This is, in simple terms)
    2. +1
      15 February 2018 18: 02
      Quote: Vard
      ... but the latest development ... since 2009 ... we have been harnessing something for a long time ...

      Yes, the century of drones has already come, because the sub-muzzle radar is no longer needed.
    3. 0
      16 February 2018 01: 00
      Quote: Vard
      Everything is fine ... but the latest development ... since 2009 ... we have been harnessing something for a long time ...

      Take it higher. Since the 90s I know the characteristics (well, from the magazines of course) and I am waiting for a real result. As a result, we see a sluggish "modernization" that simply catches up with the opportunities announced in the late 80s.
  2. +7
    15 February 2018 12: 55
    Would he introduce an ejection, or from the point of view of the construction in any way?
    1. 0
      16 February 2018 01: 04
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      Would he introduce an ejection, or from the point of view of the construction in any way?

      Previously, for a similar question, they brutally beat. That’s why superhumans left - who commented in secrecy. For whom to comment? You can’t type in the Yandex question-answer search yourself? Taekha Milevsky and Kamovsky helicopters? And what am I talking about ...? ((The helicopter ejection system apparently does not exist in reality. I was trying to ask questions - no one answered me. Look for the tests of the Ka-50 catapult. You will see the mannequin. This is not a proven aircraft seat. This is a new system that nobody has I decided to try it again.Who will go to heroes?
  3. +5
    15 February 2018 12: 56
    "let's turnstiles, good and different !!" ... "we need helicopters - they are all important to us" ... slogans in the style of OSOVIAHIM ....
  4. +3
    15 February 2018 12: 56
    Appearance is severe. Looks good
  5. +12
    15 February 2018 12: 57
    The machine is good ... only, I think that the KA-50 wasn’t put into production in vain. It was the Shark that was supposed to be used in conjunction with the Alligator. And given the modernization, to date, the KA-50 would not be a "drummer", but a song.
    1. +5
      15 February 2018 13: 27
      The Ka-50 in Chechnya in 2001 withstood all the tests, proving the correctness of the chosen concept. Since then, electronics has stepped forward a generation - there are opportunities to greatly facilitate the work of the pilot. In vain they abandoned him.
  6. +1
    15 February 2018 13: 21
    By analogy with the Ka-52, a lot of work. On the next branch I already wrote about this.
    Hermes, Threat, have long been asked for (threat APKWS), new cannon shells. A radar with an antenna based on a truncated paraboloid is an anachronism. And in the ECO it’s time to get rid of the French components. I hope that Vitebsk-25 has already been brought to standard.

    And, of course, the night cure is "cured."
  7. +3
    15 February 2018 13: 44
    and video approximately how BKO will look
  8. 0
    15 February 2018 13: 49
    Particularly pleased in the text about the modernization of engines. If the power was increased, then SUPER! Not enough "twenty-eighth" thrust-weight ratio. Still, the Mi-38 would be quickly tested and put into production. Eights and their derivatives are cool cars, no questions asked. But morally obsolete technology. A replacement has long been needed.
  9. +2
    15 February 2018 13: 51
    I do not like the Beatles, I never listen, although I heard almost all of it, the neighbor often hummed. And lightning passed through the ear in June of the 90th. But if I listen, then I hear the helicopter for 25 km. Something like this would be invented by fellow designers, so that the engines would run quieter.
    1. +4
      15 February 2018 14: 02
      But if I listen, then I hear the helicopter for 25 km.
      So you need to send to the air defense to economically replace the radar. With appropriate salary and allowance
      1. +3
        15 February 2018 14: 45
        Quote: Gritsa
        So you need to send to the air defense

        Or sonar on a submarine. good
      2. +2
        15 February 2018 14: 45
        Quote: Gritsa
        So you need to send to the air defense to economically replace the radar.

        I would consider any suggestions wink a brush. By the way, at the expense of 25 km is not a joke. But you, dear Russians, put at least one Thor or Shell in Kant. Keep away from sin.
  10. +1
    15 February 2018 16: 49
    didn’t have time to release now they are modernizing everything, well, at least someone would correct the face of this Mickey Mouse ...
  11. 0
    15 February 2018 19: 32
    tests in Syria revealed a bunch of flaws and delayed the modernization of the machine
  12. +1
    15 February 2018 19: 54
    Ka-50 and Ka-52 are still better. But Mi-28 has stronger lobbyists.
  13. 0
    15 February 2018 19: 57
    It’s good that they began to experience in combat conditions! So they revealed the ... jamb on KA52, when the gun tore off the helicopter’s side in line!
  14. 0
    15 February 2018 21: 43
    Quote: Humpty
    I do not like the Beatles, I never listen, although I heard almost all of it, the neighbor often hummed. And lightning passed through the ear in June of the 90th. But if I listen, then I hear the helicopter for 25 km. Something like this would be invented by fellow designers, so that the engines would run quieter.

    It is audible when it flies high, and when on a shaver ... I'm sorry, you can get rid of surprise. :) Our joke had it - along the clearing, the tops of the trees at the window level. :)
  15. 0
    15 February 2018 21: 56
    It was not entirely reasonable to take the car into service and upgrade. The Mi 35 could replace the "temple hunter" by 60% and the "Aligator" by all 120%!
    We lose a lot of money and time. Three machines for solving "in essence" one task.
  16. 0
    16 February 2018 08: 29
    Quote: Steve57
    It was not entirely reasonable to take the car into service and upgrade. The Mi 35 could replace the "temple hunter" by 60% and the "Aligator" by all 120%!
    We lose a lot of money and time. Three machines for solving "in essence" one task.

    But we do not know how otherwise - we all have three - 3 tanks (72, 80, 90), 3 fighters (su-30, su-35 and instant-35)