Military Review

The worthless guests of Vladimir Solovyov

65
The worthless guests of Vladimir Solovyov



Playing negative characters is often harder than positive ones. An intelligent and therefore deadly “enemy” who is looking at the screen should force the viewer to freeze with fear, worrying about the fate of the main characters.

In “Seventeen Moments of Spring”, the role of the fascists was played by the best Soviet actors: O. Tabakov (Schellenberg), J. Vizbor (Borman), L. Bronevoy (Muller). The film became a cult work of the era, which was watched by the whole country. In other films the fascists played less well-known, but always very talented actors. Such as A. Masiulis (“A man in civilian clothes”, “If the enemy does not surrender”), who managed to create on the screen an image of a truly clever and ruthless opponent.



Who would have watched “17 Moments” if the jesters played the roles of Muller and Schellenberg? Who is interested in such a film? And how then to explain to the viewer: who fought for four years, and why is the Victory so expensive?

Unfortunately, this performance has become possible and has the highest ratings in our time. “Evenings” with Vladimir Solovyov are a sample of that low-grade show in which the presenter and the audience “kick” one of the participants. But for general fun, instead of a real adversary, the camp of the “enemy” represents total nonentities.

Inviting such “experts” as Grigory Vinnikov is a demonstration of disrespect for the audience. A character from the initially tarnished reputation of a “traitor-emigrant” - this is how it looks in the eyes of the Russian public, not possessing any knowledge, factual or oratory.

To play in a foreign field, in a hostile environment, strong nerves and a quick mind, combined with politeness of a diplomat, are necessary. The answers are concise and clear. Every bad word will be used against.

Commenting on the last scandal with the triumphant removal of Vinnikov from the air, let us ask ourselves: what did this character do in the program? Hero warriors are inviolable. This should be understood by any adult, adequate person. Desecrating the memory of fallen soldiers, you can only achieve public hostility and become persona non grata.

So where did Vinnikov go with his ridiculous opinion? "... I went to war, to give the land to the Shiites to the Sunnis."

If he had any questions or just wanted to add a fly in the ointment, what prevented him from finding a better time? The subject of the Syrian confrontation is an inexhaustible source of controversy. Many conflicting points. Come in the evening of the next day and ask a question about the continuation of hostilities and military losses aviation, two months later, after the official announcement of the end of the operation against ISIS (ISIS, a terrorist organization, is banned in Russia).

Soloviev and the experts in the studio could immediately explain to the “dull-witted American,” and at the same time to everyone who is concerned about this issue: ISIS, as a centralized “state,” has ceased to exist. But there remain scattered gangs of militants, with whom the irreconcilable struggle continues.

However, Vinnikov did not find anything better than to senselessly insult the memory of the fallen pilot on the day of farewell to Roman Filippov. Just - pointless. At the wrong time and in the most offensive form.

Soloviev forced the cynical guest to leave the air. The audience exploded with righteous anger: an American, get what they deserve! Rating transfer soared to heaven.

It remains unclear what goals the “expert” Greg Vinnikov pursued? At best, he is simply stupid, but then the question arises to Solovyov: why does he invite such guests time after time for those who are interested in looking at it.

At worst - Vinnikov intentionally plays the role of a jester, because it is in this form that it is advantageous to Solov'ev.

"He was a fitter Vanya, but in the spirit of the Parisians he appropriated the title - electrical engineer Jean." (V. Mayakovsky.)


Are among millions of Western journalists, analysts, businessmen and economists could not find someone more decent? To speak at prime time on the central Russian TV channel, invite a real American who would be able to defend his point of view and not play up to Solovyov, demonstrating his inconsistency on all issues.

There is always a choice. Knowledge of Russian is not an indicator. Many foreigners, including quite well-known in the political and economic environment, they have close ties with Russia, they know Russian realities, Russian culture, and speak freely in Russian, sometimes even better than Vinnikov.

Yes, such a guest will not be able to shame at a convenient moment: “He left for sausage”. And a dispute with him will require some mental effort on the part of the presenter and the writers of the program. But the image of a real enemy with the repulsive appearance of a CIA resident and the cunning of a wolf on Wall Street could create the appearance of a discussion, adding to it a share of intrigue and increasing the information content of the program. There is no risk that the enemy will get out of control at some point and blurt out too much. Being the author, creator and presenter of his programs, Vladimir Solovyov is free to choose the most acute topics in which you can achieve a quick surrender of the enemy; the victory will always remain with the representatives of the Russian side.

Alas, Solovyov prefers to assert itself at the expense of the imbeciles. He openly sneers at the incompetence of his “guest” to the loud applause of the crowd. Instead of a full-fledged discussion, to which the program has a format, viewers see a one-actor theater in which the leader “kicks” his “American opponent” from all sides, scoring Vinnikov with knowledge and charisma. And the latter, in response, mumbles inaudibly, not having enough intelligence or wit to fend off Solovyov’s attacks.

The public needs an image of an “enemy” in which all the most disgusting expectations and stereotypes are concentrated. But you can not bring the idea to the point of absurdity!

Look at Vinnikova absolutely impossible. If that “probable enemy” looks like this, then what does all our efforts mean in the Cold War and its new round at the beginning of the XXI century? You can completely relax and not make any effort.


From the file of the "American journalist": Greg Weiner - a businessman who owned in the past his travel company in the United States. Real name and surname - Grigory Vinnikov. When an entrepreneur acquired many debts, he was forced to close his business and return to Russia, to his homeland. Currently lives in St. Petersburg.

Surprisingly, many do not notice the obvious. Most viewers seriously perceive Weiner-Vinnikov as an agent of foreign intelligence services sent to Russian television for ideological sabotage. To desecrate the memory of the heroes, and to questions about the evidence given by them figures on any issue, he smiled stupidly and answered: "It is written on the Internet." Gentlemen, such an “agent of influence” would have been rejected at the selection stage due to complete incompetence.

“Evening with Vladimir Solovyov” and his guests are not shown on CNN. And the State Department itself is hardly interested that some private person, a bankrupt businessman, appears on a television show in another country, discrediting the United States by his appearance in public.

Unfortunately, millions of Russians see the popular program of Solovyov. And if, instead of Vizbor and Armored, the role of enemies in it is played by such nonentities, it becomes alarming for the level of Russian journalism and the intellectual level of the wide audience.
Author:
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 12 February 2018 06: 52
    +30
    100%. The topic is fully disclosed.
    1. passing
      passing 12 February 2018 07: 05
      +21
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      100%. The topic is fully disclosed.

      Up to 100% was not enough stuff.
      The leading and so-called experts are drowned for the current government, how they are doing everything right and how the Americans, Europeans and everyone else are doing everything wrong. And even if it’s not right somewhere, then this will fix the GDP, since this is a tricky plan.
      1. Varyag_0711
        Varyag_0711 12 February 2018 09: 24
        +19
        passing Today, 07:05 ↑ New
        Up to 100% was not enough stuff.
        Leading and so-called experts drown for the current government
        Excuse me, what kind of power should they drown for, in your opinion? We have “Rain” and “Echo Matzo”, which are drowned in general for anyone who gives more money.
        In general, I agree with the author. When in 2014 we got a new feature on our screens called political talk shows, then Solovyov, perhaps the only one at that time was not invited, outright idiots like yachno, kovtun, weiner, korean and the like. Then, either the ratings began to fall, or Solovyov got tired of straining and in his programs obvious inadequacies began to appear more and more often. I agree with the author, it was already completely disgusting to look at this circus. Actually the leader asserts himself at the expense of well, frankly complete insignificance. But by the way, what do we want from a talk show? You feel the most important thing here is the word SHOW, and the show, as you know must Must Go On, so since people hawk this shit, then why should he pry and try to make a really intelligent show. Bablosy Solovyov fulfills his cheers, ratings at a level, advertising in the pram time you know is not cheap, so why should he strain? The only one I watch this body for is Sergey Mikheev, of course there are still interesting people, but Mikheev says exactly what I think and feel.
        Well, look at the squalor named Greg, this is really beyond my means ...
        1. passing
          passing 12 February 2018 09: 33
          +12
          Excuse me, what kind of power should they drown for, in your opinion? We have “Rain” and “Echo Matzo”, which are drowned in general for anyone who gives more money.


          These are experts! They should not drown for someone, they should be OBJECTIVE hi
          1. Varyag_0711
            Varyag_0711 12 February 2018 09: 48
            +19
            passing Today, 09:33 ↑
            These are experts! They should not drown for someone, they should be OBJECTIVE hi
            With all due respect, the experts there can be counted on the fingers. Satanovsky, Bagdasarov, Mikheev, Nikonov, well, maybe a couple more people, the rest or lovers, or obvious provocateurs inadequate. Well, then, you would agree it would be strange to hear on central TV a point of view different from what the Kremlin is positioning on a particular issue. The nightingale, like all of their "magazine-horned" breed, is an ordinary lane working out weather vane. And apparently, he is working out it not badly, that’s all. The vector in the country will change, or, say, he will leave because of some kind of conflict on the channel, the one who will outbid him, he will sing to the tune. It is not for nothing that the profession of a journalist is as ancient as the profession you know who you are. hi
            1. passing
              passing 12 February 2018 09: 53
              +3
              Quote: Varyag_0711
              passing Today, 09:33 ↑
              These are experts! They should not drown for someone, they should be OBJECTIVE hi
              With all due respect, the experts there can be counted on the fingers. Satanovsky, Bagdasarov, Mikheev, Nikonov, well, maybe a couple more people, the rest or lovers, or obvious provocateurs inadequate. Well, then, you would agree it would be strange to hear on central TV a point of view different from what the Kremlin is positioning on a particular issue. The nightingale, like all of their "magazine-horned" breed, is an ordinary lane working out weather vane. And apparently, he is working out it not badly, that’s all. The vector in the country will change, or, say, he will leave because of some kind of conflict on the channel, the one who will outbid him, he will sing to the tune. It is not for nothing that the profession of a journalist is as ancient as the profession you know who you are. hi
              Yes! I agree with you. But, all the same, for a long time I had hoped that Soloviev and his transfer would be "independent expert advice." I'm naive recourse
              1. Varyag_0711
                Varyag_0711 12 February 2018 10: 11
                +8
                passing Today, 09:53 ↑
                I'm naive recourse
                I do not want to offend you, but I have to admit that, yes, you are naive, don’t be offended just for God's sake! hi
        2. Petr1968
          Petr1968 12 February 2018 14: 48
          +4
          Quote: Varyag_0711
          Excuse me, what kind of power should they drown for, in your opinion? We have “Rain” and “Echo Matzo”, which are drowned in general for anyone who gives more money.

          Well, don’t tell me ... We have the first one with crucified boys, there are Scheinins with shit and clowning, there are Solovyovs who buy and change their shoes in Italy several times a year, there are other "folk channels" ... Echo of Moscow not the worst media ... as they say, "You just don’t know how to cook them," the govnonosti are flowing from the federal media, they are created for seeding a quilted jacket.
          We wipe the West in Syria, they have problems and migrants .. and we are dying !!! That’s the role of Russia - oil and meat. And on the channels they twist what kind of heroes we are .. funny)))
        3. aiden
          aiden 12 February 2018 19: 56
          +2
          Watch Solovyov’s programs when he worked on NTV. He was against the then power
      2. 210ox
        210ox 12 February 2018 12: 00
        +8
        Three years I don’t look at it .... A gag reflex has developed.
        Quote: passing
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        100%. The topic is fully disclosed.

        Up to 100% was not enough stuff.
        The leading and so-called experts are drowned for the current government, how they are doing everything right and how the Americans, Europeans and everyone else are doing everything wrong. And even if it’s not right somewhere, then this will fix the GDP, since this is a tricky plan.
        1. dauria
          dauria 12 February 2018 12: 12
          +2
          Three years I don’t look at it .... A gag reflex has developed.


          People willingly pay for entertainment (watching, which means rating and money from advertising), but start teaching them at least the multiplication table - they stand on their hind legs.
          Three years !!! For three years, people have been taught that Chupa-Chups caramel is also tasty and they sell at the price of the Chocolate Bear in the North. And accustomed all the same. They do it cheaply, sell it expensively (advertising goes off scale). And the gag reflex? So it is only for those who have tasted real chocolates.
        2. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 12 February 2018 13: 25
          +9
          Quote: 210ox
          ode three no longer watching this .... Gag reflex worked out.

          Let me disagree .....
          Both Babayan and Kulikov can not compete with Solovyov in terms of the magnitude of invited guests to talk shows. "Time will tell" and "60 minutes" are even lower in the ranking. Although D. Saymes and A. Cohen, who had visited the “Right to Know” personal “guest” broadcasts of Kulikov, having received the time and opportunity to answer all the questions of the participants, both ours and foreign, they were able to plainly and intelligibly convey to the interested persons the US position (administration Trump, Senate and Congress) in relation to the Russian Federation. And at Solovyov they were forced to answer in time trouble.
          "Show must go on... "- this is a rule for everyone who comes on the air.
          Yes, Zhorika Vinnikova, such heavyweights as Satanovsky, immediately “put in place”, popularly explaining that “size matters” can adversely affect the health of the “former Turkish citizen”.
          It is impossible not to put on public display “Ottudov clowns”, otherwise we will not know their opinion about what is happening both in Syria, and in Ukraine, the USA and other interesting places.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 12 February 2018 10: 09
      +4
      It just so happened that all seemingly serious programs turned into blah blah shows. Need a rating and high salaries leading. But Solovyov’s programs turned into a noisy bazaar, so much so that it buried its ears from yelling. But the "highly cultured" presenters and guests are not even ashamed of such behavior.
    3. sgazeev
      sgazeev 12 February 2018 19: 00
      +5
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      100%. The topic is fully disclosed.

      Eh left early Zadornov left early. He would have put this Dodik in his place. fool
    4. smart ass
      smart ass 12 February 2018 20: 14
      +4
      My wife calls these shows a talking room. I watch TV during the day as I work, then I went on vacation, turn on the TV during the day and, horror, on each channel there is a “talking room” who destroys our roads? -NATO! Who pisses in the elevator? - trump! Who broke the snowman in the yard? - SBU!
  2. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 12 February 2018 06: 56
    +23
    Poor guests of Vladimir Solovyov
    again about this circus ... I used to watch it, now it’s not, I’m tired, even poor actors do not change ... Malakhov’s discharge show. Satanovsky directly “scored” this “big top” (as he said) he remained from the sane Mikheev, but it was better to listen to him separately, “iron logic”, and then he began to repeat himself ... “bazaar traders” and not the participants ... into the furnace. and yes ... Nikonov insisted that they ask for Vinnik’s grim, Solovyov apologized to Grishka ... almost vomited me ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. kepmor
      kepmor 12 February 2018 07: 39
      +21
      what is pop - such is the coming ...
      a bunch of Jews + Armenian have been "racking their brains" for years ... how can they, so "patriotic", finally equip this bastard Russia ...
      and for whom is this God's chosen show ???? .... clearly not for sane people ...
      and Solovyov is still that mastiff to change shoes in the air ... as indeed all his relatives ....
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 12 February 2018 13: 22
        +2
        And they all feed well.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 February 2018 06: 57
    +8
    viewers see a one-man theater, in which the presenter “kicks” his “American opponent” from all sides, hammering Vinnikov with knowledge and charisma
    But at the same time the so-called Greg Weiner does not come out with talk shows on various channels. It turns out that this is not Solovyov asserting himself (and why does he need it today when popularity is higher than the roof), but Vinnikov is ready for everything just to loom daily on Russian TV.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 12 February 2018 07: 02
      +17
      Quote: rotmistr60
      It turns out that this is not Solovyov asserting himself (and why did he need it today when popularity is higher than the roof)

      it is a “weather vane”, always “asserting itself” ...
      used to bark, now wags its tail.
      1. a housewife
        a housewife 12 February 2018 11: 01
        +7
        I didn’t hear anything that he wouldn’t say now. In addition to the specific situation on NTV, which I no longer remember what was there. About Putin ... and what did he say about Putin? He spoke of those who like to whisper in your ear. And who loves those? He did not bark or wag. He personally expresses his opinion. There are many here to read, it still doesn’t happen - here and there, and there is no question of respect for each other.
  4. apro
    apro 12 February 2018 07: 00
    +8
    The show must go on at all costs.
    Solovyov’s booth on other channels with rudeness, basal squabbles, and hysterical attacks has already been reached. There is nothing valuable that is informative. Only streams of dirt.
    But the show must go on.
    To further zombie consumers of informational garbage.
  5. Black joe
    Black joe 12 February 2018 07: 14
    0
    The only trouble is that the dog barks
    The caravan is coming
    А
    Solovyov’s popular show is seen by millions of Russians

    A lot of what is built on gossip and scandals, and not that broadcast
    Many men have become worse than bazaar merchants washing bones
    Who said what?) Ah?
  6. mavrus
    mavrus 12 February 2018 07: 18
    +12
    But it’s interesting ... And someone is still watching these political talk shows with "kovtunami". (I have no desire to memorize all of them surname, enough that I remember the most earning on "our" TV). As far as I noticed, all my friends only after hearing these characters jumping from one program to another, immediately switch to another channel, and if on the other channel these same “multi-station”, then to the third and so on ... Even without trying to find out what Solovyov, Strizhenova and the rest of “our hosts” will “reason”, and the Kovtuns “confront” them ... portraying an “enemy opinion”. Does anyone really notice that over the past three years the rating of all these shows has become zero.
  7. Ravik
    Ravik 12 February 2018 07: 22
    +16
    Our TV has become a HELP ...
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 12 February 2018 08: 06
      +8
      I’ll clarify ... TV, like all media, is just a kitchen for any government, where they are prepared by population phenomena ....
      and the main purpose of the consumption of these "phenomena" is to turn our heads with you into a HELP ....
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 12 February 2018 08: 48
        +26
        Quote: kepmor
        Our TV has become a HELP ...

        truly ...
        1. bratchanin3
          bratchanin3 12 February 2018 11: 30
          +7
          What a beautiful photo! I sincerely rejoiced at the accuracy of the image and conciseness! Bravo to the author !!
        2. faradien
          faradien 13 February 2018 03: 59
          0
          Do you think somewhere there is a TV that is not called garbage? And when we didn’t have it? In the early 90's or early 00's? Ah, probably in the late 80s ... Alas, each time has its own trash! You can watch and filter, or watch only "Culture", you can not watch at all, but read and click on the net, that’s exactly where the trash is. Man is always dissatisfied with something. Sometimes I watch both Solovyov and Sheinin, only filtering. Sometimes interesting things come out
          1. bratchanin3
            bratchanin3 15 February 2018 08: 01
            0
            In principle, I agree, but on the Internet, at least you can choose from a variety, and on the TV screen, except for the cops and the odious Bandera, there is nothing.
  8. elenagromova
    elenagromova 12 February 2018 07: 34
    +4
    Correctly this scum thrown out. Though I didn’t fight, I realized from the first that I had to leave, once ordered. The place of such cynics is behind the door. The main thing is that a chronic russophobe does not turn the show into a triumph - they must lose to the applause of the audience.
  9. baudolino
    baudolino 12 February 2018 07: 37
    +13
    Solovyov is an ideological fighter for banknotes. How can you take these shows seriously?
  10. Enoch
    Enoch 12 February 2018 08: 22
    +1
    Is it a nightingale?
    It is all “our” media from a liberal boiler.

    "Black raven, black raven,
    What are you driving me?
    You won’t wait for prey
    Black raven, I'm not yours! "
  11. prior
    prior 12 February 2018 09: 05
    +7
    What kind of journalists are such and shows, what "elite" is such and such a country.
  12. unignm
    unignm 12 February 2018 09: 13
    +2
    Transmission rating skyrocketed
    all you need to know about this show.
    I wonder if there is someone who looks at each issue?
  13. Alex66
    Alex66 12 February 2018 10: 23
    +9
    Solovyov’s program began to repeat; there are no new topics, there are no new people, one has to switch immediately from the individual gag reflex. We have so many internal problems of our own, but it rarely skips. And most of them are concerned about education, healthcare, pension, the minimum wage, gas prices, but no, we should listen to Ukrainian demagogues.
  14. Altona
    Altona 12 February 2018 11: 02
    +9
    I don’t watch the Shabbat show of Voldemar Solovyaner with his useful Shabbegs in the form of "moral and political opponents" for a long time. Why not watching? Because it's silly to compare the Kremlin chimes and the Chinese alarm clock.
  15. Radikal
    Radikal 12 February 2018 11: 19
    +9
    Looking at Vinnikov is completely impossible.
    And on Solovyov? wink
  16. Radikal
    Radikal 12 February 2018 11: 21
    +6
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    Quote: kepmor
    Our TV has become a HELP ...

    truly ...

    good yes
  17. Radikal
    Radikal 12 February 2018 11: 23
    0
    Quote: Varyag_0711
    passing Today, 09:33 ↑
    These are experts! They should not drown for someone, they should be OBJECTIVE hi
    With all due respect, the experts there can be counted on the fingers. Satanovsky, Bagdasarov, Mikheev, Nikonov, well, maybe a couple more people, the rest or lovers, or obvious provocateurs inadequate. Well, then, you would agree it would be strange to hear on central TV a point of view different from what the Kremlin is positioning on a particular issue. The nightingale, like all of their "magazine-horned" breed, is an ordinary lane working out weather vane. And apparently, he is working out it not badly, that’s all. The vector in the country will change, or, say, he will leave because of some kind of conflict on the channel, the one who will outbid him, he will sing to the tune. It is not for nothing that the profession of a journalist is as ancient as the profession you know who you are. hi

    good ... And they stand (profession) side by side! wassat
  18. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 12 February 2018 11: 27
    +4
    The author is right! As these fake clowns are already tired, although the topics are interesting and people are mostly smart and interesting, except for the ardent Bandera.
    1. faradien
      faradien 13 February 2018 04: 10
      0
      This is such a dramatic art. Wow, what would be those who would spit on. Yes, and a variety of opinions is respected. Everything is chinarin. wassat By the way, these ardent ones also reflect the opinion of some groups "there" and this is also some indicator winked laughing
  19. Sergeant71
    Sergeant71 12 February 2018 11: 31
    +8
    Also found a topic for discussion ..... Discussion of the eternal battle of toads and vipers. But Solovyov, who once began as an intellectual journalist with a good sense of humor, has not caused anything but disgust in recent years.
    1. elenagromova
      elenagromova 12 February 2018 11: 34
      0
      In general, the fact that he did expel the liberatedist is not a disgust. On the contrary, well done.
    2. Baloo
      Baloo 12 February 2018 22: 29
      +2
      Quote: Sergeant71
      Also found a topic for discussion ..... Discussion of the eternal battle of toads and vipers. But Solovyov, who once began as an intellectual journalist with a good sense of humor, has not caused anything but disgust in recent years.

      To lead fm every 5 minutes, schizophrenia ... a good argument when there is nothing to say. And hysterical as a menopausal woman with an unsettled personal life. Such is his style, although you cannot refuse the mind.
  20. NEXUS
    NEXUS 12 February 2018 11: 51
    +11
    Alas, Solovyov prefers to assert himself at the expense of idiots. He openly mocks the mediocrity of his “guest” to the thunderous applause of the crowd. Instead of a full-fledged discussion, to which the broadcast format has, the viewers see a one-man theater in which the presenter “kicks” his “American opponent” from all sides, hammering Vinnikov with knowledge and charisma. And he in response only inarticulate mumbles, having neither enough intelligence nor wit to parry Solovyov’s attacks.

    What kind of discussion are we talking about if there is a scream and a scream and no one hears anyone. They interrupt all the time, switch to shouting. What kind of discussion are they talking about? Is this a constructive dialogue? Yes, I beg you.
    The fact that Solovyov invites one or two jesters who “defend” the western point of view is not even funny. Kovtun, and Ukrainian patriots are already fed up with their frank stupidity and lack of professionalism. Western "guests" are also from the same big top as Kovtun and Co. ... I have not watched this program for a long time. It's a shame that in prime time, on the central channel, they show an open circus, calling it a discussion.
    1. RUSS
      RUSS 18 February 2018 11: 39
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      Western "guests" are also from the same big top as Kovtun and ...

      These "clowns" get very good money for these programs, and people are being fooled by this nonsense.
  21. GK
    GK 12 February 2018 12: 28
    +4
    Solovyov did not expel, but apologizing about ten times, he asked this moron to leave, and then after Nikonov instantly reacted to the rudeness of the idiot grega-grisha ... and he told the presenter that he should drive this idiot out of the air. If Nikonov did not pay attention to this, then Solovyov would not even have paused any. Alas ... and this fact is very depressing. - Nikonov is a man. Mikheev man.
  22. igorra
    igorra 12 February 2018 12: 40
    +6
    Unfortunately, millions of Russians see the popular Solovyov show
    Stopped. And not only Solovyov rolled down the floor, but many presenters, on different channels. Looks like an order has come to our non-worthy media.
  23. Vsevolod
    Vsevolod 12 February 2018 14: 24
    +2
    But during the war, the Germans were shown cruel d @ beaters.
  24. Sewer krainiy
    Sewer krainiy 12 February 2018 14: 38
    +4
    Quote: mavrus
    But it’s interesting ... And someone is still watching these political talk shows with "kovtunami". (I have no desire to memorize all of them surname, enough that I remember the most earning on "our" TV). As far as I noticed, all my friends only after hearing these characters jumping from one program to another, immediately switch to another channel, and if on the other channel these same “multi-station”, then to the third and so on ... Even without trying to find out what Solovyov, Strizhenova and the rest of “our hosts” will “reason”, and the Kovtuns “confront” them ... portraying an “enemy opinion”. Does anyone really notice that over the past three years the rating of all these shows has become zero.


    I also watch, sometimes there are interesting topics, but if I see all the faces familiar to the guests, I immediately switch, tired of dullness. I found the Ukrainian channel NewsOne, there, at 19.00 Moscow time, there is also a type of analytical program called “Ukrainian format”, it seems, with a viewer vote. There is something to see and analyze. On the one hand, there are frank Natsiks, on the other, Muraev, Bondarenko, and others, who speak for the normal state policy of Ukraine: against Bandera, corruption, for the restoration of friendly relations with Russia and all neighbors. Voting shows 30, 35 by 70, 65 percent in favor of the latter. There you can see politicians from Kharkov, Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk .... well, and the Nazis are real, smart, real enemies, and not Kovtun and others like him ...
  25. Opera
    Opera 12 February 2018 15: 20
    +3
    Quote: Sewer Krainiy
    There you can see politicians from Kharkov, Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk .... well, and the Nazis real, smart, real enemies,

    It is better to look at the affairs of politicians from Kharkov, Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk in Kharkov, Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk. Where to look at smart, real enemies, I will also tell you - read the reports from LDNR!
  26. sxfRipper
    sxfRipper 12 February 2018 15: 31
    +1
    Soloviev prefers to assert himself at the expense of idiots.
    Sometimes I glance at his “seams”. The general impression is that he is more and more positioning himself as especially God-chosen (and this started back in the days of NTV, Rudolfich sang Hawa Nagil and explained what Jews have with us ...) surrounded by idiots. And not only in the studio.
    PS - and as a moderator - yes, any, the most seedy shtetl forum would have kicked him out with the wording - uh ... for narcissism.
  27. Antares
    Antares 12 February 2018 15: 55
    +1
    A smart and therefore deadly “enemy” looking from the screen should make the viewer freeze with fear, worrying about the fate of the main characters.

    in this case, this is the host of the program and the customers of this show, only they are worse than enemies. They are wolves in sheep's clothing.
    smart "enemy" will not come to the talk show. Even if he agrees, he will not be invited, this is a collapse of the concept.
    Moreover, there is no discipline in Russian talk shows, assault, fisticuffs, interruptions, screams (the same in Ukrainian). There is not only a smart enemy, here your smart ones will not come.
    For a smart enemy, such shows are half the victory, they play into the hands. Disorienting society and causing hats.
  28. Falcon5555
    Falcon5555 12 February 2018 16: 03
    0
    Personally, I didn’t understand what Vinnikov said - they all together said something at the same time. And I did not notice any scandal - they invited me to come, then they asked, and very politely, to leave - so what? The master is the master. No, well, if he really said something bad, then it’s right that they asked - the memory of the heroes should not offend. But personally, I did not hear what he said at all.
    But I generally wonder - why go to Solovyov? He himself offends many with a word, and even just with his drunken tone.
  29. Dashing
    Dashing 12 February 2018 17: 15
    0
    I just took it off my tongue. The author is super respect.
  30. Scorpio05
    Scorpio05 12 February 2018 17: 16
    +2
    I agree with the author. Soloviev specially selects for himself absolutely insignificant caricatured “opponents” in order to look like an absolute genius against their background, with one wave of his hand driving away vile “enemies” from the studio, to the delight of a gullible and enthusiastic audience. And my beloved joy, and the ruined "tour operator" profit. Yes, and his clown service jackets ... A base show with cheap actors who know where to lie, that is, freeze deliberate stupidity in order to help Soloviev’s “triumph” and to take place. It is very similar to the theatrical show of wrestlers in the USA - wrestling, with parody enemies, always losing to good characters - simple and patriotic, to their guys ...
  31. Radikal
    Radikal 12 February 2018 18: 35
    +1
    Quote: elenagromova
    In general, the fact that he did expel the liberatedist is not a disgust. On the contrary, well done.

    Take your time to articulate the praises to him, you saw how difficult it was for him - he said a bunch of "sorry" before that, he had nowhere to go! laughing
  32. Terenin
    Terenin 12 February 2018 18: 43
    +6
    And how then to explain to the viewer: with whom they fought for four years and why is Victory so dear? this is precisely noted by the author, what is more stupid than showing the Nazis in films (remember, drunken waves are coming to our bunker and they are being knocked down by hundreds ... with Mark Bernes) thereby stealing the Great Victory from our war veterans who defeated a strong and treacherous enemy.
  33. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 12 February 2018 19: 38
    +4
    The purpose of these and similar shows is to create a sense of danger among the electorate from the State Department and just the West, so that the electorate cannonically reaches out to vote for Putin.
  34. Neogumanoyd
    Neogumanoyd 12 February 2018 21: 19
    0
    When I see these muzzles, I reflexively press the button for the next channel ... Without going into it, I have time in less than a second ... It's good that the remote control is in the hand and not the gun ....
  35. LMN
    LMN 12 February 2018 22: 11
    +3
    To understand what is "good", you need to know what is "evil".
    In other words, if many argue that the “experts and presenters” are bad, apparently commenting here, they know great experts and presenters. what

    But for some reason, they don’t give examples of “right” alternative shows, experts and presenters. A bit strange.

    Well, who might not look like a "clown", for example, defending the position of Ukraine?

  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. Scorpio05
    Scorpio05 13 February 2018 13: 59
    0
    Quote: LMN
    To understand what is "good", you need to know what is "evil".
    In other words, if many argue that the “experts and presenters” are bad, apparently commenting here, they know great experts and presenters. what

    But for some reason, they don’t give examples of “right” alternative shows, experts and presenters. A bit strange.

    Well, who might not look like a "clown", for example, defending the position of Ukraine?

    And because, other "correct" alternative or sensible polemicists who own the topic are not allowed on TV channels) Primitive role-playing games. There, only comedic characters can act as opponents (they even look funny like Kovtun, or with speech defects that do not speak Russian well, it looks like they just pulled a mix of compost from the farm and so on.) Which are periodically "simple patriots" for the audience’s fun ( such an image already, a characteristic role), snowstorms or triumphantly Solovyov expels to applause about satisfied okhlos ...
    1. LMN
      LMN 14 February 2018 10: 59
      +3
      Quote: Scorpio05
      Quote: LMN
      To understand what is "good", you need to know what is "evil".
      In other words, if many argue that the “experts and presenters” are bad, apparently commenting here, they know great experts and presenters. what

      But for some reason, they don’t give examples of “right” alternative shows, experts and presenters. A bit strange.

      Well, who might not look like a "clown", for example, defending the position of Ukraine?

      And because, other "correct" alternative or sensible polemicists who own the topic are not allowed on TV channels) Primitive role-playing games. There, only comedic characters can act as opponents (they even look funny like Kovtun, or with speech defects that do not speak Russian well, it looks like they just pulled a mix of compost from the farm and so on.) Which are periodically "simple patriots" for the audience’s fun ( such an image already, a characteristic role), snowstorms or triumphantly Solovyov expels to applause about satisfied okhlos ...

      Well, how is it not allowed?!? Here in the prongram "60 minutes", was not so long ago Nino Burjanadze. It was very interesting to listen to her.

      I think people of this level do not go in the first place because they will have to answer many uncomfortable questions.
  38. Seld
    Seld 14 February 2018 14: 45
    0
    Eeyore cry!
    And what, no one knew that the nightingale was a show man!?!?!?!?!?!
    His transmission is SPECTAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What kind of analytics can be in the play ??????????
    Well, remember any theater. Production in any theater? What does analytics have to do with it ????????
    All these talk shows are paid scripts with the same actors! This was known for a long time, this was not particularly hidden!
    Wonderful: the same ones are invited to discuss ABSOLUTELY different topics (from Ukraine to Korea, including the economy, education, etc.).
    I ate ear! Specialists "for all questions" !!!!! But for an inexperienced people - the most!
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. Awerty242316
    Awerty242316 11 February 2020 09: 05
    0
    And why Solovyov in his programs https://yapolitic.ru/7736-voskresnyy-vecher-s-vladimirom-solovevym-090220 ignores the theme of coronavirus. They only talk about Ukraine. Is it really more important ???