Shoigu: A-100 during the tests confirmed the correctness of the technical decisions made

41
The new aircraft of the radar patrol and A-100 guidance during the tests confirmed the correctness of the technical decisions made, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said during a conference call of the department.

The aerodynamic characteristics of the A-100 aircraft with an installed antenna fairing, the operation of all aircraft systems and radio equipment have been checked. Tests confirmed the correctness of technical decisions
- he said.



Shoigu: A-100 during the tests confirmed the correctness of the technical decisions made


He recalled that the first flight of the prototype A-100 took place in November 2017.

Aircraft A-100 is created in the framework of the experimental design work "Premier 476". It should replace the A-50 and A-50U aircraft.

The basis for the creation of the A-100 was the military transport aircraft Il-76MD-90A. A fairing with an antenna system and the latest special radio equipment are installed on it, allowing you to quickly increase the radar field in a given operational direction. Besides, aviation the complex can detect and track air and other targets, as well as participate in the management of fighter and strike aircraft when pointing at air, ground and sea targets.

As previously reported by Shoigu, the serial deliveries of the A-100 aircraft to the troops will begin in the 2020 year.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    2 February 2018 13: 43
    We are glad faster in the troops. smile
    1. +10
      2 February 2018 13: 52
      Beautiful plane turned out!
      1. +10
        2 February 2018 14: 02
        Quote: siberalt
        Beautiful plane turned out!

        So it turned out at the time of the development of the "Soviet AWACS" A-50 ...

        Changes, outwardly in no way (or almost in any way) did not affect the appearance of the "old man."
        And all changes are hidden INSIDE Yes .
      2. +2
        2 February 2018 18: 01
        Quote: siberalt
        Beautiful plane turned out!

        Here are just a photo in the article A-50, not A-100.
    2. +2
      2 February 2018 19: 07
      The old A-50 on 650 km saw, the new A-50Y sees on 1000 km. It is interesting A-100 as far as it sees, in no way worse.
      Well, the color of the new car is just ATAS! Designer Medal soldier good
  2. +15
    2 February 2018 13: 43
    Video to the news

    1. +13
      2 February 2018 13: 53
      Both of you have A-50 videos.
      1. +14
        2 February 2018 13: 57
        The all-seeing Eye of Mordor watches the bright world of the West! The Dark Lord sees everyone !!! laughing
        1. GRF
          +2
          2 February 2018 15: 57
          Quote: KVU-NSVD
          The all-seeing Eye of Mordor watches the bright world of the West! The Dark Lord sees everyone !!! laughing

          With relish, you are obsessing the country ... Molodssss ... Come on, many masochists like it ...

          People respecting their country are unlikely to be called an evil empire, this does not apply to fools and traitors ...
          And so we draw conclusions ...
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +1
            2 February 2018 21: 30
            Why would Mordor be the evil empire? Are good the elves? Or hobbits?

      2. +9
        2 February 2018 15: 44
        figwam

        And what kind of antenna is so fashionable above the cab itself ...
  3. +1
    2 February 2018 13: 44
    That is, in the rearmament program until 2020, it is not in production plans? Is that bad! You need to start building it today! By 2020, it will become hopelessly out of date!
    1. +9
      2 February 2018 13: 51
      Quote: Herkulesich
      You need to start building it today! By 2020, it will become hopelessly out of date!

      Is it so ? Who knows for sure its characteristics and their relationship with promising foreign developments?
    2. +3
      2 February 2018 13: 57
      The rearmament program includes the modernization of the A-50 to A-50U.
    3. +8
      2 February 2018 14: 21
      By 2020, it will become hopelessly out of date!

      At the expense of "hopelessly" you certainly went too far. So far, technology has not become obsolete so quickly. In addition, it certainly laid great opportunities for modernization for the future.
      A-100 is really handsome.
      1. +3
        2 February 2018 15: 28
        A-100 design started in the 2000s. After long troubles (Indians, Jews and Chinese were still hanging around there), in fact, only in 2003 a contract was signed for OCD on the A-100 plane with the Russian Ministry of Defense. The first flight was planned for 2016, in 2014 the Taganrog Aircraft Plant received the first serial IL 76MD-90A
        Compared with the A-50 - no doubt a step forward. And what is there at the adversary? .. (no need to talk about the quantity - they, in that area, alas, are ahead) They also did not stand still ..
  4. +3
    2 February 2018 13: 48
    The view was impressive!
  5. +1
    2 February 2018 13: 57
    The main thing is that there is enough money for the purchase. The thing is dear ....
  6. +1
    2 February 2018 14: 00
    I wonder how many of them are needed in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation ???? I think ours took into account a lot and surpassed the vaunted American AWACS ....
    1. +6
      2 February 2018 14: 09
      Quote: Alexey-74
      I think ours took into account a lot and surpassed the vaunted American AWACS ....

      Actually, what is "ancient", but still "at a level" A-50 worse than AWACS?
      1. +3
        2 February 2018 15: 53
        Actually, what is wrong with the MiG-21 or MiG-23 still flying? ..)) And then they are rushing around with the PAK-FA, you know .. hi
        1. +5
          2 February 2018 16: 24
          Quote: Gregory_45
          Actually, what is wrong with the MiG-21 or MiG-23 still flying? ..)) And then they are rushing around with the PAK-FA, you know ..

          WHERE in Russia yet "while the 21st and 23rd fly? And?
          Or are you talking about anything?
          1. +2
            2 February 2018 18: 35
            Quote: Separ DNR
            Or are you "in obchem"

            the point was that the A-50 (40 years ago), compared to foreign AWACs, was about the same as the MiG-21 or MiG-23 versus modern cars. Not only did he jump on us in quantity, we can’t give up positions in quality. A-50 is now "no cake"
            1. +2
              2 February 2018 23: 04
              Quote: Gregory_45
              the point was that the A-50 (40 years ago) compared to foreign AWACs is about the same as the MiG-21 or MiG-23 versus modern cars.

              Definitely worse?
              Here are the scoundrels, Soviet designers, developers ... slipped armies bullshit ...
              And this fact is even more egregious, with an eye to the fact that the A-50 was developed as a response to AWACS, and should have had higher characteristics.
              But deceived, villains ...
              In general, the A-50, and the A-100, sucks? SO in your opinion?
              1. +3
                2 February 2018 23: 23
                Are you in a normal tone of discussion being hampered by a lack of upbringing or “universities” of ITL?
                Quote: Separ DNR
                A-50 was developed as a response to AWACS

                When did the E-3 take off? How many upgrades has he already completed? Offhand: B and C, not counting smaller ones. You, apparently, think that the adversary took from the moment the A-50 appeared and fell into a coma. Or in hibernation. Why even the Air Force needed the latest A-100s, I won’t even know how much, even if the old A-50 covers them all, but not once. The new AWACS aircraft create as new threats appear and a new elemental base and technical solutions that can increase the combat characteristics so that it is expedient to get to work.

                Quote: Separ DNR
                In general, the A-50, and the A-100, sucks? SO in your opinion?

                These are your wordsthat for you may be "A-100 sucks"I am responsible only for my words (they are given in my comments above), and not for yours, especially not responsible forour speculation. Deal with them yourself
              2. +2
                3 February 2018 14: 32
                Quote: Separ DNR
                Overall

                meaning meaningless to pull out of context, comrade
                1. +1
                  3 February 2018 14: 38
                  Quote: Separ DNR
                  Overall Yesterday, 23: 04


                  Quote: Gregory_45
                  meaning meaningless to pull out of context, comrade

                  Wo-o0o, you "covered" Yes ... More than 12 hours have elapsed since the moment you responded to the comment, from which you still continue to reflexively “pull” quotes at your discretion.

                  Take care of your health. it is one ...
                  1. +3
                    3 February 2018 15: 38
                    Quote: Separ DNR
                    Take care of your health

                    calm like a wise Kaa boa. Next time, let yourself vow to count at least ten before knocking on the keys) Language, he must first connect to the brain.
                    1. +1
                      3 February 2018 17: 28
                      Quote: Gregory_45
                      Language, he must first connect to the brain.

                      In fact, there should not be a gap between them (physiology, you see, everything else - PATHALOGY Yes ).

                      I grieve that this is exactly what you have.
                      1. +1
                        3 February 2018 17: 33
                        when there is something to connect with - although it’s too late, it’s connect. Half the trouble. When there is nothing (as in your case) - you can only sympathize
    2. 0
      2 February 2018 16: 03
      I think that at least a couple of units per military district. So 10 units.
    3. +3
      2 February 2018 16: 18
      Quote: Alexey-74
      I wonder how many of them are needed in the RF Armed Forces

      The Union built 40 pieces of A-50. Plus, RTR aircraft
  7. 0
    2 February 2018 16: 08
    Another "stone" in the foundation of the foundation of the armed forces of Russia.
  8. +1
    2 February 2018 16: 52
    What a beautiful airplane!
  9. 0
    2 February 2018 17: 46
    Firstly, in the photo in the title of the article A-50 (or A-50U), and secondly, about 20 copies were built in the Union. A few more were built with almost such
    it seems to be a "plate", but this is a completely different topic.
    1. +4
      2 February 2018 19: 30
      Quote: borys
      Firstly in the photo in the title of the article A-50

      A-100 is very distinguishable in appearance?
  10. +2
    2 February 2018 17: 55
    Shoigu may not confirm this ... laughing
    Three times Syria the liberator ...
  11. +1
    2 February 2018 19: 36
    As they say, not a single AWACS ...
  12. +1
    2 February 2018 19: 42
    flyers connect. I haven’t seen the A-50 with asphalt paint in my lifetime; maybe, all the same, a-50? as for analogues from the usa, they don’t advertise anything new, they were too self-confident to the point of cook.
    1. +3
      3 February 2018 15: 32
      Quote: Lance
      I didn’t see the a-50 with asphalt paint, maybe it’s a-50y

      maybe all the same the A-100 was painted? ..))
      Russia has only 4 A-50U cars, these are:
      1st aircraft - board number "47", registration number RF-92957, serial number 40-05. Transmitted in October 2011. The color is standard white and gray.
      2nd aircraft - board number "33 red", registration number RF-50602, serial number 41-05. Transmitted at the beginning of 2013. The color is dark gray.
      3rd plane - board number "37 red". Transmitted in February 2014, had a standard color (white and light gray), proper name "Sergey Atayants"
      4th aircraft - board number "41 red", registration number RF-94268, serial number 63-05, its own name is "Taganrog". The color is standard white and gray. Transmitted at the end of 2016
      I could be wrong, but a new color (dark gray) was introduced in the time of Serdyukov. Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu overturned the decision of his predecessor. Now you can see the brand new aircraft (the same Su-35, Su-30SM and Su-34) in the "old blue" color
      in the photo - the fourth A-50U with the name "Taganrog"
  13. +1
    3 February 2018 00: 21
    Well, what I want to say on this occasion, God forbid, that there would be no war, but it is better to be prepared and trained for it than discussing peace.