Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation told who "killed" the initiative to investigate himatak in Syria

16
Russian representatives in the UN Security Council commented on the statement of their American colleagues, according to which Moscow “killed” the Joint Investigation Mechanism for Chemical Attacks in Syria (IDA), reports RIA News.

Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation told who "killed" the initiative to investigate himatak in Syria


Earlier, the US plenipotentiary reported that Washington would send $ 350 thousand to finance the International impartial and independent mechanism for investigating crimes in Syria (MBNM) and expects that it will allow to investigate including chemical attacks, because Russia "killed" SMR.

The United States Permanent Mission to the United Nations deliberately omits the fact that they were the last to kill our resolution in the UN Security Council, which would extend and breathe new life into the Joint Investigation Mechanism and make it independent, objective and professional.
said in a statement by Russian diplomats.

In November last year, the Russian Federation blocked the extension of the mandate of the UN-OPCW’s mission to investigate weapons in Syria (SMR) to develop a new format for the work of investigators.

Permanent representative Vasily Nebenzya explained then that "the extension of the mandate of the RMC is possible only with the correction of the fundamental flaws in its work." Moscow proposed the creation of a new international investigative body, and prepared a corresponding draft resolution. The United States opposed the Russian initiative, saying at the same time that they are ready to restore the CMP right now.

The agency recalls that the UN’s “International Impartial and Independent Mechanism” established in December 2016 for collecting evidence that would “facilitate and speed up the investigation of those responsible for the most serious crimes under international law committed in Syria since March 2011 year, and their prosecution. "

MBNM is based in Geneva, with about 50 people (lawyers, experts, translators).
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    1 February 2018 15: 00
    I read the article twice and didn’t understand anything. What are we talking about?
    1. +3
      1 February 2018 15: 05
      Apparently, the entire composition of the construction and installation works is supported by the US financial support, therefore, it will write down what the owner will dictate, which is why Russia hacked the extension of the powers of the puppet commission.
      1. +3
        1 February 2018 15: 25
        Quote: Thought Giant
        therefore he will write what the owner dictates,

        they confirmed that Syria destroyed all its chemical warfare arsenals, and even received a prize for it, and then it turns out that it seems to be, as it were, since such a commission can be trusted?
        1. +3
          1 February 2018 16: 44
          Quote: Giant thought
          Apparently, the entire composition of the construction and installation works is supported by the US financial support, therefore, it will write down what the owner will dictate, which is why Russia hacked the extension of the powers of the puppet commission.


          So they also investigate remotely, according to the filmed "chronicles", and they never went to Syria.
    2. +2
      1 February 2018 15: 05
      It's about money wink But something is not enough.
    3. +1
      1 February 2018 15: 05
      They didn’t give a test tube to them at the UN, so they were offended ... laughing
    4. +8
      1 February 2018 15: 11
      Quote: zzdimk
      I read the article twice and didn’t understand anything. What are we talking about?

      About moving to the UN. Yes
    5. +1
      1 February 2018 16: 52
      And really .... What is the message in the article? The USA abandoned the UN structure, created their own, pay and call it impassable? Am I reading right?
    6. 0
      1 February 2018 19: 28
      Quote: zzdimk
      I read the article twice and didn’t understand anything. What are we talking about?

      Everything is as usual, Assad is to blame for anyone! Even when the Syrians are bullied by the baboons, and the Americans need an investigation with a well-known answer. The commission should just read what the Americans will write to it.
    7. 0
      1 February 2018 19: 57
      Quote: zzdimk
      I read the article twice and didn’t understand anything. What are we talking about?

      The fact is that Russia proposed to investigate the “chemical attacks” on the spot in Syria, and not in London or Geneva.
  2. 0
    1 February 2018 15: 00
    The United States simply hits the nail and the finger with a hammer. What kind of "investigation" are we talking about, if the Syrian government is blamed anyway, well, according to American custom, Russia? This is not an investigation, but a persecution ....
  3. 0
    1 February 2018 15: 02
    Earlier, the US plenipotentiary reported that Washington would send $ 350 thousand to finance the International impartial and independent mechanism for investigating crimes in Syria (MBNM) and expects that it will allow to investigate including chemical attacks, because Russia "killed" SMR.

    Something is not enough Yankees piloted under impartial (aha) and independent (aha). Oh, what Russia, - killed the mechanism laughing It would be possible to send as much to drink again.
  4. +2
    1 February 2018 15: 14
    The point is that the UN mechanism is no longer suitable for the United States, since Russia has unambiguously stopped its convulsions and torment (as if not finding Syria chemical weapons in Assad). Therefore, the Americans will allocate denyuzhki to some "independent mechanism", which now will not depend on Russia and the UN. For the sake of persuasiveness, it was decided to call this “mechanism” also “impartial”. Money, of course, is not enough - it’s not at the expense of the common boiler of the UN that I pick my nose ... so far the epithets “objective” and “professional” have been postponed until the next tranche to this “mechanism”.
  5. +2
    1 February 2018 15: 31
    Everything is clear there for a long time because the mantra “Russia is guilty of everything” helps many to refute both its incompetence and the inability to deal with facts.
  6. 0
    1 February 2018 21: 37
    How much can you believe in the objectivity of the investigation, which was conducted with the money of a country that, under any pretext, does not destroy its chemical weapons.
  7. +1
    2 February 2018 00: 15
    If the commission on construction and assembly work had not been sold to felons and claimed that the CAA does not have and does not use chemical weapons, the United States would still blow into its tune that Assad is to blame for everything. It’s like with the Iranian nuclear program: the inspection confirms that Iran is fulfilling its obligations, and the US know for themselves, claim the opposite. "Exceptional" on all UN commissions that have not yet bought, as well as on the UN itself put their device. When their global financial dominance breaks, then their hearing and vision will be thinned out, but only their conscience will never be.