Military Review

X-101 named the best cruise missile in the world

161
Boris Obnosov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, General Director of Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation, called the Russian X-101 the world's best cruise missile, reports Lenta.ru report.


X-101 named the best cruise missile in the world


It has unsurpassed characteristics in range, speed, accuracy. Today no one has weaponsequal to this. The X-101 has excellent selectivity in choosing a target,
Obnosov said in an interview with the Military Industrial Courier.

According to him, the rocket "is an original, very complex inertial guidance system that allows you to accurately calculate the location in space in flight, even without seeing the target."

The weapon “multiplies the speed by time and approximately knows how much has flown, in what direction,” and also can do without GPS and GLONASS, Obnosov added.

The strategic subsonic cruise missile X-101 was developed by the Raduga design bureau (part of the Tactical Missile Armament). With a starting mass of two and a small tons, it is capable of delivering warheads weighing about 400 kg to a distance of 5,5 thousand kilometers with an accuracy of hitting the target within 15-20 meters. When creating a rocket also applied technology to reduce radar visibility.
Photos used:
https://militaryarms.ru
161 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 24 January 2018 12: 00
    21
    And on its basis, a long-range missile is already being developed ... at the same time, discussions are ongoing about the land and sea basing of this KR.
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 24 January 2018 12: 02
      12
      Quote: NEXUS
      at a distance of 5,5 thousand kilometers

      And on its basis, they are already developing a long-range missile ...

      Nexus, Where is even further then 5,5 thousand. Km? The carrier does not need to enter the air defense zone. laughing
      But the speed can and should be increased.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 24 January 2018 12: 13
        +6
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        Where is even further 5,5 thousand km ?! The carrier therefore does not need to enter the air defense zone

        It is being developed for the TU-22 X-50 with a range of up to 2000 km ... and on the basis of the X-101 a new long-range missile is being developed. And a range of 5500 km is for the X-102, with nuclear warhead, with a high-explosive warhead, a range of about 3000 km.
        A project of a promising long-range cruise missile. 23.02.2017/160/2 GosNIIAS scientific adviser Yevgeny Fedorov said in an interview that a long-range long-range cruise missile was included in the project of the modernized Tu-2017M3000 aircraft. Probably, as of 101, work is underway to formulate requirements and determine the appearance of a new rocket. The range of the new missile will significantly exceed XNUMX km - the range of the X-XNUMX
        1. The Siberian barber
          The Siberian barber 24 January 2018 20: 41
          +7
          It’s good, of course, but now, it’s worth counting the number of “axes” and their carriers, and ours ....
          We will shout "Hurray", further ??
          1. gringo
            gringo 24 January 2018 22: 07
            +1
            100 (500) tu 95 and 16 tu 160. Each minimum of 8 missiles. A total of at least 1056 missiles at a time. Not sure if there are so many missiles.
          2. SergF123
            SergF123 25 January 2018 06: 44
            +7
            Hurray, we will scream to Russian weapons, not to the rulers! And at the expense of “hatchets” - this is a weapon for bombing 3 sorted states such as Ukraine, bombing Russia with slow and inaccurate cruise missiles is in principle impractical, since the carriers of “hatchets” are guaranteed to be destroyed - these are the 1st, 2nd carriers still need to break through the launch distance, well, and the third to overcome three, if not four lines of air defense. and 3th EW does not sleep))) to the delight of us and the envy of the mattress. Syria itself clearly showed that hatchets are yesterday.
          3. Aleks2048
            Aleks2048 25 January 2018 07: 44
            +2
            For rockets with vigorous filling, the quantity is not so critical. All the same, everything is limited by the contract. For such weapons, the guaranteed delivery of charge to the destination is more important. For example, the United States even has several missiles in North Korea piss. The damage you see is unacceptable. Although the situation with missiles is the same as in our entire defense, it is really desirable to have more, but the fact that it’s not a new weapon is that it’s all “unique” with us, probably because it’s a piece. :)
          4. Semen Semyonitch
            Semen Semyonitch 31 January 2018 05: 51
            +1
            Quote: The Siberian Barber
            We will shout "Hurray", further ??

            No, we’ll do hara-kiri for ourselves ...
          5. Axon
            Axon 31 January 2018 18: 24
            0
            We’ll shout “Hurray.”
      2. The_lancet
        The_lancet 24 January 2018 12: 37
        +4
        Boris Obnosov, General Director of Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation, named the Russian X-101 the best cruise missile in the world

        The director of the corporation called his development the best in the world? I am not surprised.
        Are there experts in the comments who are versed in this topic? Can anyone adequately compare the characteristics of Russian missiles with those of others?
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 24 January 2018 12: 52
          12
          Quote: The_Lancet
          Are there experts in the comments who are versed in this topic? Can anyone adequately compare the characteristics of Russian missiles with those of others?

          And what comparison do you want to get? Tomahawk with X-101? So your ax is old as mammoth excrement and on its basis mattresses make “new CDs.” Or do you want to learn about the development of the French or Britons? So their CRs are also analogs of the ax, for nothing that they are called differently, but the essence is the same and the filling is similar. What are you going to compare? Is there a new CD in the West? Is it a new, not an ax reincarnation?
          1. bulvas
            bulvas 24 January 2018 13: 19
            +3
            Quote: The_Lancet

            The director of the corporation called his development the best in the world? I am not surprised.
            Are there experts in the comments who are versed in this topic? Can anyone adequately compare the characteristics of Russian missiles with those of others?


            It may well be
            Another thing is that such a championship is short-lived.

            The goal was to surpass the characteristics of Tomogavka, which had not changed for many years - there was no need.

            They will set a goal to surpass someone else’s best at the given time,
            - it may well turn out

            While there was no such goal - a new arms race is just beginning
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 22
              11
              Quote: bulvas
              The goal was to surpass the characteristics of Tomogavka.

              They were already surpassed by creating Caliber. At the same time, back in the 70s, we had a Grenade rocket torpedo with a nuclear warhead, which was in the arsenal of the SCHUKA-B submarine, and which flew 2500 km.
              1. bulvas
                bulvas 24 January 2018 13: 24
                +7
                Quote: NEXUS
                They were already surpassed by creating Caliber.


                Agree

                Just, I think, so far no one has exceeded the goal.
                They cannot be sold, there is no competition in the market

                Enough for their purposes

                We would have to come off in space, step on the heels.

                Over time, you probably have to translate Shoigu into space


                1. AnpeL
                  AnpeL 24 January 2018 20: 49
                  +1
                  The weapon "itself multiplies the speed by time and approximately knows how much flew by, in which direction", and is also able to do without GPS and GLONASS

                  Well, what goes without jeepies is of course already good, it really was worth paying attention to.
                  1. ZVO
                    ZVO 25 January 2018 15: 40
                    0
                    Quote: AnpeL
                    The weapon "itself multiplies the speed by time and approximately knows how much flew by, in which direction", and is also able to do without GPS and GLONASS

                    Well, what goes without jeepies is of course already good, it really was worth paying attention to.


                    Pay attention to this? Are you generally not in the subject?
                    GPS systems more or less began to work by the end of the 90s, when the satellite orbital group was fully formed ...

                    And before that there was a bunch of cruise missiles with an inertial guidance system - with almost the same accuracy ...
                    so the availability of GPS is not a worthy point ...
                    1. AnpeL
                      AnpeL 26 January 2018 08: 44
                      0
                      No, this is not about that. You just did not understand sarcasm. GPS is an American positioning system and the fact that it was used for pointing our missiles at all is kind of to say the least, that we would understand ... well, it’s wrong
                    2. gringo
                      gringo 1 February 2018 18: 17
                      0
                      The American positioning system is called NAVSTAR. GPS is the same as all xerox copiers are called. The Russian version will have a satellite navigation system
                  2. Star
                    Star 25 January 2018 23: 54
                    +1
                    Cruise missiles flew when there was no GPS.
                2. Aleks2048
                  Aleks2048 25 January 2018 08: 02
                  +1
                  Dreams of separation in space are already a reality. We already came off ... with what apparently in full on a cut budget. Missiles fall as if they cost 5 kopecks per kilo, and a pack also at a discount. Korolev would say to his party comrades-in-arms "Comrades, you all starved to work until you were stupefied, but someone didn’t mix something up and now you’ll have to seem as much again." And the supreme Queen is “Well, it’s full of you, don’t worry about this creative path, we’ll push everything out of insurance. You’re irreplaceable here.” Now in space, we would have to catch up with competitors. Our space is like AvtoVAZ when it reports that their best cars only do not bring income, and therefore give money.
                  1. Star
                    Star 25 January 2018 23: 52
                    +1
                    Chinese space, and catch up with the rest.
          2. self-propelled
            self-propelled 24 January 2018 20: 30
            +1
            Quote: NEXUS
            Are there experts in the comments who are versed in this topic? Can anyone adequately compare the characteristics of Russian missiles with those of others?

            Quote: NEXUS
            And what comparison do you want to get? Tomahawk with X-101? So your ax is old as mammoth excrement and on its basis mattresses make “new CDs.” Or do you want to learn about the development of the French or Britons? So their CRs are also analogs of the ax, for nothing that they are called differently, but the essence is the same and the filling is similar. What are you going to compare? Is there a new CD in the West? Is it a new, not an ax reincarnation?

            in order to compare something with something, you need to know the performance characteristics of the compared ones. plainly the characteristics of the "axes" do not know what to say about the X-101 (102). assumptions, no more. only in battle (God forbid) can you at least somehow compare
          3. Star
            Star 25 January 2018 23: 48
            +1
            TTX are secret and we will not hear the truth now.
            There is nothing to compare.
            For a nuclear charge, ultra-high accuracy is not needed, by the way the "axes" are the same exact.
            And as for GPS navigation, ANY cruise missile initially did not need it.
            If there is a war with the use of nuclear weapons, there will be no satellites.
            Each master praises his blade.
        2. Evgenijus
          Evgenijus 24 January 2018 13: 32
          13
          The_Lancet:
          Can anyone adequately compare the characteristics of Russian missiles with those of similar others?

          In Yugoslavia, how many American missiles reached the target? Is it not known?
          And how many American missiles flew from ships to targets in Syria? Is it not known?
          Now, about the Russian missiles. All the targets of terrorists Russian missiles struck.
          Is it enough?
          1. Scalpel
            Scalpel 24 January 2018 15: 01
            +1
            You wrote a lie here.
          2. ZVO
            ZVO 24 January 2018 18: 32
            0
            Quote: Evgenijus

            Now, about the Russian missiles. All the targets of terrorists Russian missiles struck.
            Is it enough?


            You yourself answer the question - how many calibers fell in Iran and Syria before reaching the target?
            There is information about this ...
            1. Evgenijus
              Evgenijus 24 January 2018 21: 07
              0
              The effectiveness of cruise missiles is verified by the effect of suppressing targets. Dozens of Tomahawks really suppressed the airfield of the Syrian troops? Where is the effect of combat use? Frightened Syrians? And not expensive? Now about the Caliber. All these launches against targets in Syria are the working out of a new weapon in a combat situation, a more serious opponent will get more painful than ISIS. Tomahawks when created? Already it's time to the museum ...
              1. ZVO
                ZVO 26 January 2018 13: 41
                +1
                Quote: Evgenijus
                The effectiveness of cruise missiles is verified by the effect of suppressing targets. Dozens of Tomahawks really suppressed the airfield of the Syrian troops? Where is the effect of combat use? Frightened Syrians? And not expensive? Now about the Caliber. All these launches against targets in Syria are the working out of a new weapon in a combat situation, a more serious opponent will get more painful than ISIS. Tomahawks when created? Already it's time to the museum ...


                Crushed.
                Destroyed all the fuel and storage infrastructure. Radar, 10-14 aircraft, several hangars. Partially damaged runway.
                If you wanted to destroy it completely, you would destroy it ...
                Just everything
                1. zombirusrev
                  zombirusrev 29 January 2018 16: 44
                  +1
                  Kindly link to reliable sources otherwise "Ff ............ fff firebox!" (C)
            2. Bratkov Oleg
              Bratkov Oleg 4 October 2018 17: 34
              0
              Quote: ZVO
              ... how many calibers fell in Iran and Syria before reaching the target?
              There is information about this ...

              Who has the information? Is it possible for a patient from some room, or can it be watched at UkrTV?
          3. self-propelled
            self-propelled 24 January 2018 20: 34
            +3
            propaganda - weapons will probably be worse than nuclear ones. Well, I really want to look at the official statistics on the launches of “axes” and “calibers”. But who will give it ?!
          4. Aleks2048
            Aleks2048 25 January 2018 08: 21
            +1
            Not enough. To bomb popuars who do not have missile defense is one thing, bombing countries with missile defense that have minimal missile defense is another, and encountering an adversary who has powerful layered air defense and missile defense is the third option, and judging by the number of X101 and X102, it’s an expensive pleasure to drag them into the Papuans.
            1. Bratkov Oleg
              Bratkov Oleg 4 October 2018 17: 35
              0
              Not only that, missile defense and air defense are layered, but there are also delivery vehicles to the United States.
        3. Saburov
          Saburov 24 January 2018 15: 05
          0
          Quote: The_Lancet
          The director of the corporation called his development the best in the world? I am not surprised.


          You won’t praise yourself, as they say ... they won’t give money.
          1. Bratkov Oleg
            Bratkov Oleg 4 October 2018 17: 38
            0
            The United States flew into space only 10 years after Gagarin, and not just on the moon, in general, have never been in orbit. But so selflessly, in Anglo-Saxon, they lied that the USSR had stolen some secrets from them ... That's the same with American military equipment, unsinkable aircraft carrier formations, and so on. They will still hit the politically isolated third world country, but with the slightest support of this country, the situation is changing radically.
        4. Orionvit
          Orionvit 24 January 2018 17: 21
          +2
          Quote: The_Lancet
          Are there experts in the comments who are versed in this topic? Can anyone adequately compare the characteristics of Russian missiles with those of others?

          All that the director listed was invented and implemented 40 years ago. Electronics of course is another generation, and so, apart from range, nothing outstanding. Yes, and why? A similar class of missiles copes with its tasks quite successfully.
        5. Vkd dvk
          Vkd dvk 25 January 2018 12: 40
          +1
          Quote: The_Lancet
          Boris Obnosov, General Director of Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation, named the Russian X-101 the best cruise missile in the world

          The director of the corporation called his development the best in the world? I am not surprised.
          Are there experts in the comments who are versed in this topic? Can anyone adequately compare the characteristics of Russian missiles with those of others?

          Questions .... But who will tell you specific figures from both this and that side?
      3. Nick
        Nick 26 January 2018 22: 48
        0
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        Nexus, Where is 5,5 thousand km still further?

        And the X-102 presumably has an even greater range, due to a lighter combat special unit
      4. Antianglosax
        Antianglosax 31 January 2018 08: 25
        0
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        Where is 5,5 thousand km still further?

        Range is good. You sit at yourself near Saratov and watch by satellite how the amerobases explode on another continent.
    2. Chertt
      Chertt 24 January 2018 12: 16
      +7
      I remember the old American movie, how Tomahawk slowly flies into the open window of the fortified premises of the terrorists. Bullshit full but looked spectacular. Russia is not finalizing in terms of advertising its products
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 24 January 2018 12: 30
        +5
        Chertt Today, 12:16 ↑ ... Russia is not finalizing in terms of advertising its products

        Alexey, hi. hi !
        Perhaps we lose in advertising, but I suppose it is better only in advertising.
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 24 January 2018 12: 57
          +3
          Good evening, we have hi
          Quote: aszzz888
          but I suppose it's better only in advertising.

          Four years, I had to work in advertising (terrible time). So there Russia has many talents wink
          1. aszzz888
            aszzz888 24 January 2018 13: 02
            +2
            Chertt Today, 12:57 Four years, I had to work in advertising (terrible time).

            ... I sympathize wink ... and our "Caliber" is no worse than that hatchet, from the Merikatos movie, will fly into the window ... wink
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 24 January 2018 14: 51
              +2
              Quote: aszzz888
              ... I sympathize ... and our "Caliber" is no worse than that hatchet, from the Merikatos movie, will fly into the window ...

              But would it be all the same to the majahid? Does such a hotel fly into the window or fly to him or at the door the size of a hangar?
      2. Yuyuka
        Yuyuka 24 January 2018 12: 52
        +6
        Quote: Chertt
        I remember the old American movie, how Tomahawk slowly flies into the open window of the fortified premises of the terrorists. Bullshit full but looked spectacular. Russia is not finalizing in terms of advertising its products


        Well, advertising, advertising is different ... sometimes it’s better to finally not advertise some of your military products until a certain point. The effect of surprise is the best in this ad. An example is Gauges. Such advertising is low-cost, memorized for a long time and impressions - "the most indelible" winked
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 24 January 2018 13: 00
          +5
          Quote: Yuyuka
          Such advertising is low-cost, memorized for a long time and impressions - "the most indelible"

          We show what we have, and the Americans, with their rocket in the window, which is not and is unlikely to be
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 09
            +6
            Quote: Chertt
            We show what we have, and the Americans, with their rocket in the window, which is not and is unlikely to be

            And the volley of night Caliber from the ship is not an advertisement for you?
            1. Grandfather
              Grandfather 24 January 2018 13: 24
              +1
              Boris Obnosov, General Director of Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation, named the Russian X-101 the best cruise missile in the world, reports
              it would be strange if he said differently. request and yes: "has no analogues." yes
            2. Tusv
              Tusv 24 January 2018 15: 44
              +1
              Quote: NEXUS
              And the volley of night Caliber from the ship is not an advertisement for you?

              No, Andryukha, it was a salute in honor of the DR GDP :) At the same time, hard trolling of the West
              1. Bratkov Oleg
                Bratkov Oleg 4 October 2018 17: 43
                0
                Quote: Tusv
                ... it was a salute in honor of the DR GDP :) At the same time, hard trolling of the West

                Until that moment, the Caliber flew a maximum of 300 kilometers, and it was not clear why Russia had such a powerful fleet in the Caspian when other coastal countries did not have anything ...
                And then suddenly the Caliber flew far, far ... Yes, trolling, this is he himself. Then, first over the past quarter century, not a single American aircraft carrier has appeared in the Persian Gulf;
          2. Scalpel
            Scalpel 24 January 2018 15: 03
            0
            Why not? At the air base in Syria, a very neat hit, so maybe in the window.
            1. Yuyuka
              Yuyuka 24 January 2018 18: 10
              0
              Quote: Scalpel
              Why not? At the air base in Syria, a very neat hit, so maybe in the window.


              belay no comment .....

              dog-dog. I already once said here - as a result of a missile attack by the Americans, significant economic damage was done. the question is, to whom, given the cost of this entire operation? repeat
      3. Maz
        Maz 24 January 2018 14: 39
        +1
        We now have a public relations project in Syria such that no other advertising is needed.
        1. Shahno
          Shahno 24 January 2018 14: 51
          +1
          Well, the PR project is understandable. But still it is not clear what these types of weapons can do against a worthy adversary. I would say the shell showed itself, and the rest is just a salute ...
          1. Chertt
            Chertt 24 January 2018 15: 10
            +2
            Quote: Shahno
            I would say the shell showed itself, and the rest is just a salute ..

            It’s right that you are brave in comments, and so you fire at Syrian objects without entering Syria’s airspace. Why do we need the wreckage of your aircraft, return to Israel
      4. Vkd dvk
        Vkd dvk 25 January 2018 12: 42
        +1
        Quote: Chertt
        I remember the old American movie, how Tomahawk slowly flies into the open window of the fortified premises of the terrorists. Bullshit full but looked spectacular. Russia is not finalizing in terms of advertising its products

        What do you like more about a computer-animated success movie, or a combat use in nature?
    3. RASKAT
      RASKAT 24 January 2018 15: 05
      +1
      With a starting weight of two and a few tons, it is capable of delivering a warhead weighing about 400 kg to a distance of 5,5 thousand
      Well, I don’t know if there is no confusion here and a missile with a HE Non-nuclear warhead is capable of flying so much. Consequently, with the Lighter Nuclear, it is able to fly even further. Why then develop a new rocket, you can simply upgrade this one, for example, another engine, or more economical or more powerful (one for range, the other for speed).
      I would like to remind you that at a range of 5500 km, we gulp even from our airspace from Chukotka, for example or from the North Pole, covering the entire western territory of the United States, the Northern industrial part (Chicago and its environs) and the northwestern part up to Washington.
      Where is it even further?
    4. RASKAT
      RASKAT 24 January 2018 15: 32
      +1
      Well, as usual, they turned everything upside down.
      Here is a real interview from the Military-Industrial Complex Journal.
      - What can you say about your new winged rocket X-101?
      - Vladimir Putin spoke well of her. I think
      X-101 is the best weapon of the whole class of the Kyrgyz Republic. It has unrivaled characteristics in range, speed, and accuracy. Today, no one has a weapon equal to this. X-101
      excellent selectivity in target selection. After all, we “work” not on areas, but on pre-allocated facilities,
      of strategic importance. Her range
      it was impossible to even imagine actions before, but
      now is reality. Rocket
      flies, given the terrain, and at such a distance
      She finds a given goal.
      X-101 certainly has
      their zest and secrets. On
      it has an original, very complex inertial guidance system, which allows in flight, without even seeing the target,
      clearly calculate the location in space. She
      she multiplies speed by
      time and roughly knows
      how many flew in which direction. But this is not enough.
      To get, as they say, into the window, you need
      geolocation, perfect Doppler sensors,
      altimeters, good maps. Moreover, let’s say, in the summer the real picture is one, and in the winter under the snow cover it
      it may be different, but in any case it should correspond to the one that is in the memory card. Even GPS and GLONASS
      for X-101 secondary, it can do without them.

      I kept tactfully silent about the range !!!
    5. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 24 January 2018 16: 06
      0
      May I ask which one?
  2. svp67
    svp67 24 January 2018 12: 01
    13
    Boris Obnosov, General Director of Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation, named the Russian X-101 the best cruise missile in the world,
    You will not praise yourself, NO WHO will praise
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 24 January 2018 12: 02
      +5
      Quote: svp67
      You will not praise yourself, NO WHO will praise

      It's not a matter of praise ... what kind of CD in the West with such performance characteristics in the series?
      1. svp67
        svp67 24 January 2018 12: 10
        +7
        Quote: NEXUS
        What is the CR in the West with such performance characteristics in the series?

        RGM / UGM-109E Tactical Tomahawk and RGM / UGM-109H TTPV with a range of about 1500-2000 km have an accuracy of 5-10 m
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 24 January 2018 12: 20
          +7
          Quote: svp67
          RGM / UGM-109E Tactical Tomahawk and RGM / UGM-109H TTPV with a range of about 1500-2000 km have an accuracy of 5-10 m

          The range is up to 2000 km, that is, significantly less than the X-101. The Second Tomahawks were created without the use of stealth technology, unlike the X-101. And the accuracy (KVO) of the X-101 is 5-6 meters. What is the analogue of our KR to a vegetable?
          This modification of the Tomahawk with a big stretch can be compared with the X-50, and then, given that the ax has been used since 71 years, then everything is incorrect.
          1. Yuyuka
            Yuyuka 24 January 2018 12: 55
            +1
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: svp67
            RGM / UGM-109E Tactical Tomahawk and RGM / UGM-109H TTPV with a range of about 1500-2000 km have an accuracy of 5-10 m

            The range is up to 2000 km, that is, significantly less than the X-101. The Second Tomahawks were created without the use of stealth technology, unlike the X-101. And the accuracy (KVO) of the X-101 is 5-6 meters. What is the analogue of our KR to a vegetable?
            This modification of the Tomahawk with a big stretch can be compared with the X-50, and then, given that the ax has been used since 71 years, then everything is incorrect.


            with the same success can be compared with the FAU-2 wassat
          2. Viktor.12.71
            Viktor.12.71 24 January 2018 13: 25
            +1
            Quote: NEXUS
            X-101

            hi I did not find information that the X-101 is in service. I heard that since 2012 they wanted to adopt, but then silence. Tests X-101 are from 1999. There is a suspicion that they cannot finish the control system on the marching section and the guidance system on the final section.
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 34
              +5
              Quote: Viktor.12.71
              I did not find information that the X-101 is in service. I heard that since 2012 they wanted to adopt, but then silence. Tests X-101 are from 1999.

              On March 20, 2012, Russian Minister of Defense A. Serdyukov, in a speech at an expanded meeting of the board of the Ministry of Defense, said that the Russian armed forces had adopted a new long-range air-launched cruise missile. The arrival of the X-101 missiles in the Russian Air Force was expected in 2013 and, probably, in 2013 was launched. On November 17, 2015, the first combat use of X-101 missiles in Syria took place, carrier aircraft - Tu-160.

              At the same time, at least 6 times these missiles were used in the Syrian operation in a total of more than 56 KR ... launches on November 17.11.2016, 95 with TU-XNUMX, the number of missiles fired is not clear ...
              1. Viktor.12.71
                Viktor.12.71 24 January 2018 13: 37
                +1
                Quote: NEXUS
                At the same time, at least 6 times these missiles were used in the Syrian operation in a total of more than 56 KR ... launches on November 17.11.2016, 95 with TU-XNUMX, the number of missiles fired is not clear ...

                Thank! Did not know.
                1. Kasym
                  Kasym 24 January 2018 16: 13
                  +3
                  In fact, all missiles under the letter X have a secret TTX. Therefore, their use is not particularly advertised. hi
            2. Gray brother
              Gray brother 24 January 2018 13: 39
              +1
              Quote: Viktor.12.71
              I did not find information that the X-101 is in service.

              However, in Syria they were used:
              1. Viktor.12.71
                Viktor.12.71 24 January 2018 13: 47
                0
                Quote: Gray Brother
                However, in Syria they were used:

                It seems from only 2 missiles flew, the first with an ax down. Revised 3 times.
                1. Gray brother
                  Gray brother 24 January 2018 16: 26
                  0
                  Quote: Viktor.12.71
                  It seems from only 2 missiles flew, the first with an ax down.

                  From different angles taken at different distances.
          3. Grandfather
            Grandfather 24 January 2018 13: 26
            +1
            Quote: NEXUS
            The range is up to 2000 km, that is, significantly less than the X-101. The Second Tomahawks were created without the use of stealth technology, unlike the X-101. And the accuracy (KVO) of the X-101 is 5-6 meters. What is the analogue of our KR to a vegetable?

            let's measure in "things" now ... how much do we have? with them?
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 38
              +3
              Quote: Dead Day
              let's measure in "things" now ... how much do we have? with them?

              And so? Axes have been manufactured since the 70s, and X-101 and Caliber have been produced since the 10s ... at the same time, you can count and the Grenades written off the same RCC Granite and Volcano, since such a booze went. You think that the RCC is too small range? So half the warhead and the range will become comparable. At the same time, they have already proved that our anti-ship missiles work perfectly on the ground. And there are Iskanders with their arsenal, in which there is more than one KR.
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. AlexKP
          AlexKP 24 January 2018 13: 39
          +2
          The American analogue of the X-101 is the AGM-86D CALCM and it is almost four times inferior in range. Ax rocket earth to earth. Unlike X101, which is air ground.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 49
            +3
            Quote: AlexKP
            The American analogue of the X-101 is the AGM-86D CALCM and it is almost four times inferior in range. Ax rocket earth to earth. Unlike X101, which is air ground.

            In other words, the United States has no analogue comparable to the X-101. And to compare an ax with her is ridiculous.
            1. AlexKP
              AlexKP 24 January 2018 13: 51
              +1
              It is not funny to compare an ax, but not correctly. Missiles are made of different classes.
          2. Mimoprohodil
            Mimoprohodil 24 January 2018 17: 39
            0
            Then AGM-129. There is a stealth and a range of 3700 km
            1. AlexKP
              AlexKP 24 January 2018 17: 52
              +2
              In 1993, the missile entered service with the American strategic bombers B-52H.
              Since 2007, missiles have been withdrawn from service and more than 200 have already been sent for storage /
              April 24, 2012 at the Tinker air base completed the destruction of the last AGM-129ACM.
              You can not compare with what is not.
  3. BVS
    BVS 24 January 2018 12: 02
    +4
    Every sandpiper praises its own swamp.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 24 January 2018 12: 06
      +4
      Well, call it better. Just don't merge.
      1. BVS
        BVS 24 January 2018 13: 10
        0
        And what is the open information that there is enough data on the performance characteristics of this rocket and others, including "our partners"? You can firmly download what is not. For this is a zone of top secret information. Therefore - "Each sandpiper praises its swamp." That is the reality.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 24 January 2018 13: 18
          0
          Quite enough. But they do not have such missiles.
    2. askort154
      askort154 24 January 2018 14: 51
      0
      BVS ......Every sandpiper praises its swamp.


      Judging by the flag, there are no waders at all in your swamp. wink
      1. BVS
        BVS 24 January 2018 14: 56
        +4
        Do not judge by the flag, in our republic, by the way, it is included in the same union with the Russian Federation, this site is forbidden to access. It is necessary to get to it with lanes and gardens.
        1. Morozyaka
          Morozyaka 24 January 2018 20: 12
          +3
          By the way, I was very surprised to learn that in Kazakhstan, VO is blocked. I had to use the "gardens"
  4. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 24 January 2018 12: 03
    +3
    So she seems to be the newest in the world. It would be surprising if she succumbed to some other. Although of course, beautiful.
  5. Mikhail Zubkov
    Mikhail Zubkov 24 January 2018 12: 06
    +2
    A great achievement - in combination with the speed and radar capabilities of the upgraded stratospheric Mig-31BM, we have a powerful and irresistible UNIVERSAL attacking complex that can hit both stationary, inactive, and high-speed targets on the surface, in the atmosphere and near space. Hurray, hooray, hooray !.
    1. novel66
      novel66 24 January 2018 12: 10
      +3
      subsonic! set aside cheers!
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 24 January 2018 12: 47
        +5
        Quote: novel xnumx
        subsonic! set aside cheers!

        And you try to intercept her and then we'll talk. hi
        1. novel66
          novel66 24 January 2018 13: 17
          +4
          Chukchi not anti-aircraft gunner, Chukchi aviator hi
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 20
            +2
            Quote: novel xnumx
            Chukchi not anti-aircraft gunner, Chukchi aviator hi

            Tricky Chukchi? wassat So jump into the MIG-31 and try to intercept. The 31st for this created. wassat
            1. novel66
              novel66 24 January 2018 13: 33
              +2
              Well. as it seemed to me. with the interception of subsonic missiles, everyone had somehow adapted. no? (by the way, the Chukchi is not an interceptor, az strategists lol tongue )
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 41
                +2
                Quote: novel xnumx
                Chukchi is not an interceptor, az strategists)

                Then X-101 and X-50 are a present for you. Use on health. wink
                1. novel66
                  novel66 24 January 2018 16: 12
                  +2
                  I’m already old, I’ve finished on the X-22 - but it’s supersonic!
    2. Troll
      Troll 24 January 2018 12: 13
      +2
      Doctor of Technical Sciences Boris Obnosov, the tomahawk praise will not be forgotten.
      Ps: author, check the quotes in the first paragraph
  6. Dead duck
    Dead duck 24 January 2018 12: 15
    +1
    Quote: Nevsky_ZU
    Where is even further 5,5 thousand km?!

    that it would be easy enough to take off and right above the airfield and launch laughing
  7. Guru
    Guru 24 January 2018 12: 26
    0
    This is Sloppy news, such Subsonic who only Non-Produces, Well, maybe with the exception of some GABON ..
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 24 January 2018 12: 31
      +3
      Tell me an analogue of this Israeli-made rocket! am You can also voice the Qatari version!
      1. Professor
        Professor 24 January 2018 12: 49
        +4
        Quote: Herkulesich
        Tell me an analogue of this Israeli-made rocket! am You can also voice the Qatari version!

        Turbo-Pop wink

        It has unrivaled characteristics in range, speed, accuracy. Today, no one has a weapon equal to this. X-101 has excellent selectivity in target selection,

        What is her selectivity? Where they will send there and fly without choosing anything. If it does not fall along the path, then flying to the goal will take forever. Therefore, the target should sit and wait for the rocket. The bourgeoisie have feedback from the rocket. They can also correct or cancel the task.

        According to him, the rocket "is an original, very complex inertial guidance system that allows you to accurately calculate the location in space in flight, even without seeing the target."

        "Clear"? How much is "clear"? Over thousands of kilometers of flight, an error accumulates, and if you do not correct the trajectory, then one inertial system is not enough.

        The weapon “multiplies the speed by time and approximately knows how much has flown, in what direction,” and also can do without GPS and GLONASS, Obnosov added.

        Come on? Multiplies speed by time and gets distance? Itself? There are no analogues in the world. wassat

        Who cares:
        Cruise missile navigation methods
        https://topwar.ru/17195-metody-navigacii-krylatyh
        -raket.html
        1. _Ugene_
          _Ugene_ 24 January 2018 13: 38
          +2
          Why jerk? You know very well that it cannot only be with an inertial guidance system. And there is a redirection.
          And about the "multiplies speed by time" - this pearl, apparently, is intended for students.
          X-101 uses a combined guidance system: inertial system, optoelectronic correction, and other systems. It can receive complex information along the route and the coordinates of the target. Unlike previous-generation missiles, there is the possibility of fundamentally re-targeting the missile to another object. According to the test results, the missile has a circular probable deviation (CVO) of 5 m at a range of 5500 km.

          Popeye Turbo is yours on 320km. flying?
          1. Professor
            Professor 24 January 2018 14: 36
            0
            Quote: _Ugene_
            Why jerk? You know very well that it cannot only be with an inertial guidance system. And there is a redirection.
            And about the "multiplies speed by time" - this pearl, apparently, is intended for students.

            Boris Obnosov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, spoke only about a unique inertial system and about determining the distance as a function of time and speed.

            Quote: _Ugene_
            Popeye Turbo is yours on 320km. flying?

            I have no idea not only about its performance characteristics, but also about its existence.

            Quote: AlexKP
            X101 can receive complex information on the route and the coordinates of the target. Unlike previous generation missiles, there is the possibility of a fundamental re-targeting of a missile to another object.
            optoelectronic correction system + TV (media), ANN + laser altimeter / optical image according to the standards of correction areas + (probably) at the final stage of the flight - optical or radar seeker - you see not only inertial.

            Rumors, rumors, rumors.

            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: Professor
            If it does not fall along the path, then flying to the goal will take forever.

            So then is it an AIR-SURFACE class rocket ... or will you be disassembling warehouses and stationary structures during this time in order to remove it from the point of landing? wassat Well ... like in that joke about a parrot, let me turn my head, but I want to see it. wassat

            You previously uploaded a spectacular video of rocket launch. It would be better to post a spectacular video of defeat. wink
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 24 January 2018 14: 59
              +3
              Quote: Professor
              You previously uploaded a spectacular video of rocket launch. It would be better to post a spectacular video of defeat.

              Easily..



              Are you sure that the photo of your leftovers X-101?
              1. Professor
                Professor 24 January 2018 15: 22
                +1
                Quote: NEXUS
                Are you sure that the photo of your leftovers X-101?

                Are you sure that your video is the result of these missiles, and not a clipping from a computer game? wink By the way, where's the video for the remaining dozens of rockets?

                Quote: _Ugene_
                Shame on the Turbo-Popey character? It happens. Do not be discouraged, she is old.

                To be ashamed or not ashamed, you need to know the performance characteristics of these missiles. Maybe you know the performance characteristics of these missiles? lol

                Quote: _Ugene_
                We all take information from open sources here, if you have access to classified documents, share, we will be happy.

                About Axes, but the best world of Caliber is OBS.

                PS
                It’s normal that not all missiles flew. The Axes also have glitches.
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS 24 January 2018 15: 32
                  +4
                  Quote: Professor
                  Are you sure that your video is the result of these missiles, and not a clipping from a computer game? By the way, where's the video for the remaining dozens of rockets?

                  Dear Professor, you don’t be so much Jewish, maybe my mother was born in Odessa, and I still understand why rubyroid is in Odessa. hi
                  As you have written at the entrance to Haifa’s airport, “Do not flatter yourself, are all Jews here?” (I won’t say for the accuracy of the phrase, but the meaning is like that).
                  1. Professor
                    Professor 24 January 2018 15: 33
                    0
                    Quote: NEXUS
                    Quote: Professor
                    Are you sure that your video is the result of these missiles, and not a clipping from a computer game? By the way, where's the video for the remaining dozens of rockets?

                    Dear Professor, you don’t be so much Jewish, maybe my mother was born in Odessa, and I still understand why rubyroid is in Odessa. hi
                    As you have written at the entrance to Haifa’s airport, “Do not flatter yourself, are all Jews here?” (I won’t say for the accuracy of the phrase, but the meaning is like that).

                    Is there anything to say about rocket issues?
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 24 January 2018 15: 38
                      +4
                      Quote: Professor
                      Is there anything to say about rocket issues?

                      I already wrote more 20 comments in the thread ... read, no one holds your legs. Regarding computer graphics ... so with the same success, I’ll say that your Domes and Spyders are the result of your sore imagination, or rather, their falling. Do you have any objections? I must say right away that all your videos are also computer fraud.
                      1. Professor
                        Professor 24 January 2018 15: 46
                        0
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Quote: Professor
                        Is there anything to say about rocket issues?

                        I already wrote more 20 comments in the thread ... read, no one holds your legs. Regarding computer graphics ... so with the same success, I’ll say that your Domes and Spyders are the result of your sore imagination, or rather, their falling. Do you have any objections? I must say right away that all your videos are also computer fraud.

                        1. A photo of another “Caliber” that did not fly above.
                        2. Where is the video evidence of the rest of the "Gauges" so spectacularly launched on YOUR video?
                        3. Our MO was not caught in a forgery. From the word "completely." This is about a video from Iraq on board the Apache and screenshots of a computer game. There is such a thing as "REPUTATION".
                        4. You can dream up any lotions and characteristics. While there is no evidence of their existence. As well as for example Turbo Papaya "PL-surface"
                    2. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 24 January 2018 15: 53
                      +6
                      Quote: Professor
                      3. Our MO was not caught in a forgery. From the word "absolutely." This is about a video from Iraq from the Apache and screenshots of a computer game. There is such a thing as "REPUTATION".

                      Seriously, that is, in your opinion, our MO should have run alongside and take pictures throughout the flight of the Caliber and X-101 so that your nobility here would not speak about your reputation through your lip?
                      No need to pull the cat on the globe, it will swear, and its appearance is unattractive at the same time, dear Professor.
                      1. Professor
                        Professor 24 January 2018 19: 30
                        +1
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Seriously, that is, in your opinion, our MO should have run alongside and take pictures throughout the flight of the Caliber and X-101 so that your nobility here would not speak about your reputation through your lip?

                        1. It should not have been lying.
                        2. it would be nice to show at least half of the hits.

                        Quote: AlexKP
                        The same can be said of all the weapons programs of Israel.

                        Not about everyone.
                2. _Jack_
                  _Jack_ 24 January 2018 22: 08
                  +1
                  You boast with axes, they are only American, you will boast of the achievements of Israel in this area. Or if there is nothing special to boast about, then you need to diligently belittle others? Do not try to belittle the X-101 to the level of your Turbo-Pop.
                  1. Kostya Shakhnazarov
                    Kostya Shakhnazarov 25 January 2018 08: 44
                    0
                    Finally, Israeli high-tech equipment is now where much is used and installed and developed by leaps and bounds, so to speak ...
                    Fortunately or unfortunately - another question)) And this despite the fact that it all developed over a short time, quite.
                    1. _Jack_
                      _Jack_ 25 January 2018 20: 45
                      0
                      cruise missiles are discussed in this way, and not the industry of Israel, they have nothing to boast about in this area
            2. _Ugene_
              _Ugene_ 24 January 2018 15: 11
              +1
              I have no idea not only about its performance characteristics, but also about its existence.
              Shame on the Turbo-Popey character? It happens. Do not be discouraged, she is old.
              Rumors, rumors, rumors.

              We all take information from open sources here, if you have access to classified documents, share, we will be happy.
            3. AlexKP
              AlexKP 24 January 2018 18: 30
              0
              [/ quote] Rumors, rumors, rumors.


              Quote: _Ugene_
              Popeye Turbo is yours on 320km. flying?

              I have no idea not only about its performance characteristics, but also its existence. [Quote]

              The same can be said of all the weapons programs of Israel.
              1. Shahno
                Shahno 24 January 2018 18: 48
                0
                We have rumors here that on 1500 km.
        2. AlexKP
          AlexKP 24 January 2018 13: 47
          0
          X101 can receive complex information on the route and the coordinates of the target. Unlike previous generation missiles, there is the possibility of a fundamental re-targeting of a missile to another object.
          optoelectronic correction system + TV (media), ANN + laser altimeter / optical image according to the standards of correction areas + (probably) at the final stage of the flight - optical or radar seeker - you see not only inertial.
        3. NEXUS
          NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 53
          +3
          Quote: Professor
          If it does not fall along the path, then flying to the goal will take forever.

          So then is it an AIR-SURFACE class rocket ... or will you be disassembling warehouses and stationary structures during this time in order to remove it from the point of landing? wassat Well ... like in that joke about a parrot, let me turn my head, but I want to see it. wassat
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 24 January 2018 12: 40
      +4
      Quote: Guru
      This is Sloppy news, such Subsonic who only Non-Produces, Well, maybe with the exception of some GABON ..

      Che, seriously? wassat It turns out that the club of states capable of creating the Kyrgyz Republic with such ranges is much more than is commonly thought ... wassat Well, maybe Gabon is not a member of this club. wassat
  8. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 24 January 2018 13: 00
    0
    Great, but you need to make it supersonic, so that bypasses all obstacles.
    1. NOMADE
      NOMADE 24 January 2018 13: 24
      +2
      laughing yeah, as well as for satellites to be shot down in orbit, and in super-sound it’s flying 5,5 km lol
      Then it will be another rocket, with a different weight, size and cost hi
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 24 January 2018 13: 42
      +4
      Quote: Anchonsha
      Great, but you need to make it supersonic, so that bypasses all obstacles.

      She will then be called Sarmat.
  9. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 24 January 2018 13: 48
    0
    "with an accuracy of hitting the target within 15-20 meters" ////

    Is this called accuracy? This is called "hit a finger in the sky."
    The gauges fell from a 10-meter airborne landing gear. And then they did not demolish the buildings in half
    cases (video MO), but only damaged them.
    To be called an exact weapon, now you need to work to the KVO 1-2 m
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 24 January 2018 14: 03
      +5
      Quote: voyaka uh
      To be called an exact weapon, now you need to work to the KVO 1-2 m

      Seriously? Then look at any ax and carefully look at the CVO of any Tomahawk ...
      RGM / UGM-109A TLAM-N-80m (35m)
      BGM-109G GLCM-80m
      RGM/UGM-109C TLAM-C-20-25(10 м),10-15(8м)
      RGM / UGM-109D TLAM-D-10 to 25 m
      RGM / UGM-109E Tactical Tomahawk-5-10 m ...
      What did you say about 1-2 meters there? So in your opinion, the nifig ax is not a high-precision weapon. wassat
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 24 January 2018 14: 53
        0
        There are two types of Tamahawks: simplified with inertial guidance, plus GPS.
        And exact, where in the GOS the IR video camera is built in. The only difference is the price of the rocket.
        The bunkers at the Syrian air base were hit by the second type - there are hits
        were exactly according to the hearts of the roofs of the bunkers KVO 1 m approximately.
        And the buildings are struck by the first type - KVO 10m (approximately like Caliber)
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 24 January 2018 15: 03
          +5
          Quote: voyaka uh
          There are two types of Tamagawks:

          I wrote to you with block1 and with block2 ... This is official data. And your assumptions are just Wishlist. Axes like you want, axes do not yet.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 24 January 2018 18: 02
            +1
            Each such bunker received ONE through penetration exactly in the middle
            roofs (there are pictures of bins from the inside where these holes are clearly visible).
            There are about two dozen such bunkers affected. Other KR except Tomahawks
            during the raid was not applied. The maximum (practical) CVO of these attacks is approximately 1 m.
            Such accuracy is possible only if there is a video camera in the GOS missile.
        2. AlexKP
          AlexKP 24 January 2018 18: 38
          0
          What is the name of the Tomahawk modification with a CCD matrix in the head?
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 24 January 2018 18: 57
            0
            You puzzled me with your question ... Did not find. This accuracy
            (and more than once - not an accident!) cannot be provided by GPS or inertial systems. Or IR video, or millimeter radar in the head of a rocket. The second is more likely, since they began to work in this direction.
            1. AlexKP
              AlexKP 24 January 2018 19: 06
              +1
              Maybe it wasn’t tomahawks? And some sort of missiles Air Earth type Maverick. This, by the way, can explain such small destruction of GDP
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 24 January 2018 23: 30
                0
                Not. Maverick will not break through reinforced concrete. It occurred to me if the Raptors had frolic from above (having removed, finally, the lenses) with precise bombs ...?
                1. dmi3x
                  dmi3x 25 January 2018 02: 22
                  0
                  Tamagavka has a modification with cluster concrete-fighting warheads.
                  From wikipedia:
                  AGM-109H: 28 concrete-piercing BE BLU-106 / B BKEP each 19 kg
                  1. AlexKP
                    AlexKP 25 January 2018 09: 18
                    0
                    This is an aviation tomahawk.
                    1. voyaka uh
                      voyaka uh 25 January 2018 12: 24
                      0
                      Still Tomahawks beat bunkers
                      On the video www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRizvZpvXxs
                      Syrian officer shows a piece of rocket.
                      1. AlexKP
                        AlexKP 25 January 2018 12: 43
                        0
                        Well, I don’t know, I’m certainly not an expert, so for the spare parts that he shows you can’t say that they are from a tomahawk.
                2. AlexKP
                  AlexKP 25 January 2018 08: 42
                  0
                  I mean, it won’t penetrate tanks, but the reinforced concrete will not penetrate, all the more there are Models - E, F, G, J, K: high-explosive penetrating fragmentation, 135 kg (contact fuse, for protected purposes - delayed action). Maybe the raptor may be a penguin, or maybe something else.
                  1. voyaka uh
                    voyaka uh 25 January 2018 12: 27
                    0
                    There, the penetration diameter is solid - half a meter in diameter. Tanks breaks through
                    kumm. jet in a finger or two thick.
                    1. AlexKP
                      AlexKP 25 January 2018 12: 37
                      0
                      [/ quote] Tanks breaks through
                      kumm. jet in a finger or two thick. [quote]

                      Models - E, F, G, J, K: high-explosive penetrating, 135 kg (contact fuse, for protected purposes - delayed action)
    2. AlexKP
      AlexKP 24 January 2018 14: 07
      0
      Of course you need with a KVO of 1-2 m, but so far the X-101 is the best rocket in its class. And this is "Manifestum non eget probatiōne".
      1. engineer74
        engineer74 24 January 2018 20: 32
        +2
        Lies B. Obnosov, and in the eyes, X-101 is far from the best! X-102 is a thousand times better, brighter, warmer! wink
  10. Mighty Ka
    Mighty Ka 24 January 2018 13: 51
    +3
    There are more of these missiles, so that it would be enough for pedi-ko-in the American, gay-rope-tsev, and on the corrupt, Bandera Sumerian pigs.
  11. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 24 January 2018 16: 07
    0
    Bravo to the developers!
  12. The comment was deleted.
    1. _Jack_
      _Jack_ 24 January 2018 22: 04
      +2
      In almost all long-range missiles, the inertial system is used for most of the flight, but when approaching the target, other guidance systems are involved - GPS, radar, optical, etc. They already bring the rocket more accurately and compensate for the inevitable miscalculations of the inertial system.
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 24 January 2018 23: 41
      0
      "how many of these rackets do we have, a hundred at least typed?" /////

      How many X-101 is unclear.
      And Kalibrov, I think, was in the region of hundreds. All landed in Syria in the first "salvo". Then there was a pause for a couple of months - the plant worked in three shifts, as flashed in the press. They made another hundred and fired in the second wave of ISIS shelling. Missiles are very expensive and, in addition, perishable. They are difficult to store.
      Therefore, they quickly switched to FABs. Sometimes they threw KABs to train pilots.
      1. Horse meat
        Horse meat 25 January 2018 12: 16
        +1
        When there is no longer air defense, then only FABs.
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 25 January 2018 12: 22
          0
          What is ISIS air defense? Moreover, they always bombed from a height of more than 5 km.
          To guarantee not to seize a MANPADS missile.
          Simple: what was brought to the planes was bombed. HOW to quickly end
          switched to FABs. The plants tensed up, riveted KABs - they dumped them ...
          and again the FABs (of which there are many in warehouses).
  13. ADT
    ADT 24 January 2018 21: 45
    +2
    Video from YouTube about communication of Tomahawks with a Syrian base www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRizvZpvXxs
    It is not superfluous to recall this rocket in conversation http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/agm129a
    /agm129a.shtml
    They didn’t put it into service so as not to strain the situation. And so she is nothing. And it has long been created.
  14. Horse meat
    Horse meat 25 January 2018 12: 07
    0
    In my opinion, it’s not the rocket’s winging that is needed, but low-flying drones, the supersonic missiles or “hyper” sound missiles, penetrating the air defense, are reaching the target.
    The drone can then return home to refuel another rocket.
    And do not be smart to create an unmanned aerial vehicle capable of taking more than one missile on board.
    Economics for one.
  15. Dimid
    Dimid 25 January 2018 14: 14
    0
    Quote: Mikhail Zubkov
    A great achievement - in combination with the speed and radar capabilities of the modernized stratospheric MiG-31BM, we have a powerful and compelling UNIVERSAL attacking complex ... URA, URA, URA! ..

    What nonsense? And where are you going to hang on the MiG-31 missile weighing more than 2 tons ??
  16. Hadji Murat
    Hadji Murat 25 January 2018 15: 32
    0
    not bad, put into service left
  17. Kadimich
    Kadimich 26 January 2018 19: 33
    +1
    AGAIN boast of the "best" weapon in the world, but not the BEST standard of living in the world !!
    1. SEER
      SEER 29 January 2018 11: 13
      0
      Quote: Kadimich
      AGAIN boast of the "best" weapon in the world, but not the BEST standard of living in the world !!

      Let it be for now.
      and this, quotation marks are not appropriate
  18. Geterosigma
    Geterosigma 29 January 2018 11: 00
    0
    grandmother from the queue in the clinic frantically applauds this news. How good, our rocket is the best in the world (sarcasm)
    1. SEER
      SEER 29 January 2018 11: 06
      0
      Quote: Heterosigma
      grandmother from the queue in the clinic frantically applauds this news. How good, our rocket is the best in the world (sarcasm)

      oil instead of guns?
      1. Geterosigma
        Geterosigma 29 January 2018 11: 07
        0
        not. And Guns and Oil
        1. SEER
          SEER 29 January 2018 11: 12
          0
          Quote: Heterosigma
          not. And Guns and Oil

          Will you draw money?
          1. Geterosigma
            Geterosigma 29 January 2018 11: 17
            0
            I’ll tell you a secret. Nobody remembers about rockets when they put him in a queue of 38 days in the hospital for a doctor’s appointment. I’m not against good rockets. I’m constantly reminding authorities that there are big problems inside the country. And for the eternal pursuit of armaments can not be seen as the life of people (which is given only one) has been waiting for many years. It is clear that there will be no army and no country at all, but I don’t see anything bad wanting improvements in the internal sphere of the state. Karamzin once wrote that patriotism should not blind.
            1. SEER
              SEER 29 January 2018 11: 28
              +1
              Quote: Heterosigma
              I will tell you a secret. --- delirium is scratched ---- should not blind.

              what is this demagogy for?
              The direct question is - where can I get the money for everything at once?
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Geterosigma
                Geterosigma 29 January 2018 11: 45
                0
                but this is what the current and future authorities should do. And our business is to work and pay taxes. If there is nowhere to take money then no one should you want to live better? class.
                1. SEER
                  SEER 29 January 2018 11: 53
                  0
                  Quote: Heterosigma
                  but this is what the current and future authorities should do. And our business is to work and pay taxes. If there is nowhere to take money then no one should you want to live better? class.

                  we distort? we attribute to the interlocutor what he did not say?
                  upper class!! you are a demagogue of lvl 60
  19. master2
    master2 29 January 2018 23: 43
    0
    Very informative! The CEO of the corporation - if he called another rocket the best - today but would be a janitor.
  20. Angry
    Angry 6 January 2019 21: 22
    -1
    Hmm .... interesting controversy .... only with its range and speed, it will not fly anywhere .... will be shot down. At least 15 t.km at least 5 t.km the result is one. Downing. Let's not forget that our potential enemies are now technologically stronger than us ... unfortunately. And this is a low-flying, non-maneuvering target, reaching the target for 6 hours ... For air defense - seeds. It is rather a media weapon for "people" than a real weapon of Russia. She is strong for the Basmachi, who have Kalash and DShK from the "air defense" ... Only her price is such that each Basmach heaped up with her will cost us more than one million Russian money ... Something like this. And there is space reconnaissance and NORAD, RTV, fighter aircraft and air defense systems and electronic warfare and ... something else that our sages never dreamed of. In addition, the detachment of air attack forces for a separate object with warheads with TNT requires dozens of missiles to neutralize / destroy the object. Remember the Trump strike on the Syrian airfield from 59 Tomahawk CD. So what? You all know the results. And what is the X-101 better? That is, the efficiency will be similar. And these airfields, which are innumerable in Europe and America! And other military facilities too! I will not be surprised that this topic of absolutely useless weapon was tricked by "agents of US influence" ... And we were led to and spend people's money and destroy the unfortunate economy of our country ... And we will not produce several thousand of them anyway, and so the pants fall off , they began to rummage through the pockets of pensioners, in search of money for the next arms race ... With such a weapon, we will not raise the Victory Banner over the Reichstag ... and we will not even frighten anyone. How can they not see that there is a declared Great Patriotic Economic War, the weapon of which is sanctions ... strikes on the strategic directions of our economy. Here it would not be necessary to produce X-101, and all sorts of atomic Poseidons, at a cost each equal to a corvette / frigate, and turn on the brain, of course, if it exists ...
  21. cat hippopotamus
    cat hippopotamus 8 January 2019 12: 31
    0
    Unique guidance system, without "GLONASS" with an accuracy of 20 m. It is simply impossible to jam and knock off course. And if the head is five killotons, then this is no longer important. If she hits exactly in the ass or 20 meters from her, all the same, nothing will remain of the ass.