Military Review

In the Kuban, C-300 calculations "reflected" a massive enemy air strike

12
Combat crews of the S-300PS anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) from the air defense unit of the Southern Military District (UVO) deployed in the Kuban successfully repelled a massive missileaviation hit by a conditional adversary, told Vadim Astafyev, head of the press service of the Southern Military District.


In the Kuban, C-300 calculations "reflected" a massive enemy air strike


As part of the exercise, the question of covering ground objects and troops from air strikes by a conventional enemy from the air was worked out. "To maximize the complexity of the task, different types of fighter aircraft Su-30CM, attack aircraft Su-25CM, and also Mi-8AMTSH helicopters acted as a conditional enemy.
- said Astafev.

According to him, the planes entered the exercise area from different directions, made anti-missile maneuvers, flew at maximum, medium and minimum altitudes, complex aerobatics, and delivered conventional tactical strikes on detected radar stations.

In the course of performing the tasks, all targets were promptly detected, escorted and destroyed by electronic launches at the entrance to the far border of the affected area of ​​the complexes.

It is noted that during the reflection of a massive rocket-air strike, the combat calculations of the C-300PS air defense system made more than 10 simulation launches. In total, more than 100 military personnel took part in the exercise and about 10 units of military and special equipment were involved, reports RIA News.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67
    svp67 24 January 2018 09: 51
    +1
    "To maximize the complexity of the task, different types of aircraft acted as a conditional adversary - Su-30SM fighters, Su-25SM attack aircraft, and also Mi-8AMTSh helicopters
    A small UBLA WHERE? Without them, what kind of "modern" "massive blow" is this?
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 24 January 2018 09: 56
      +4
      Sergey, good day! hi
      Quote: svp67
      A small UBLA WHERE?

      Apparently, the concept of exercises did not provide for the use of UAVs ... request
      1. svp67
        svp67 24 January 2018 10: 08
        +2
        hi
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Apparently, the concept of exercises did not provide for the use of UAVs ...
        Retrograde ... Just kidding. It is clear that the S-300 is "too big and expensive" to shoot at the "flies".
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 24 January 2018 10: 13
          +3
          Well, yes, I agree. Especially after yesterday's article on "Nails" for "Shell". And the rocket to the S-300 will be more expensive "full-time" for the "Shell".
          1. svp67
            svp67 24 January 2018 10: 14
            +2
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            And the rocket to the S-300 will be more expensive "full-time" for the "Shell".

            Here you can add "SIGNIFICANT"
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 24 January 2018 10: 19
              +2
              I’m still interested in something: for “Shell” “Nail” was piled, and for other air defense systems there are similar developments? what
              1. svp67
                svp67 24 January 2018 10: 30
                +1
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                I’m still interested in something: for “Shell” “Nail” was piled, and for other air defense systems there are similar developments?

                Here you need to understand what for what. The task of the "Shell" is the near air defense zone, when the "big uncles" like S-300 and S-400, with their "middle brothers", and there are a lot of them, either they can’t cope or it will fly to the penny. An analogue of the “Shell”, but with worse performance, is the “Tunguska”. It’s possible for her that they’ll develop something similar. I also do not exclude the possibility of the appearance of such missiles during the modernization of Osa-AK, S-10, and possibly Shilka.
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 24 January 2018 10: 36
                  +2
                  I have nothing to do with air defense, but I thought about the same thing, it was just interesting the opinion "from the outside."
      2. 210ox
        210ox 24 January 2018 10: 30
        +1
        pasha hi Of course, it’s pleasing that the exercises .. But what about the reflection of a massive strike ... And did a hundred military repel it? A massive strike is thousands of missiles in different echelons and from different directions .. And at least several hundred at bases only in the Krasnodar Territory and in the Crimea .. .And this is thank God so far only an imitation of intercepting a dozen goals ..
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Sergey, good day! hi
        Quote: svp67
        A small UBLA WHERE?

        Apparently, the concept of exercises did not provide for the use of UAVs ... request
        1. svp67
          svp67 24 January 2018 10: 38
          +2
          Quote: 210ox
          A massive strike is thousands of missiles of different echelons and from different directions ..

          He won’t be in such a narrow section, they beat themselves up, and there’s not where they can get it from
        2. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 24 January 2018 10: 39
          +1
          Hello Dima ! hi I understand that even the most ambitious exercises will not provide all the options for the development of events. But support has not been canceled. yes
  2. tosha.chuhontzev
    tosha.chuhontzev 25 January 2018 13: 33
    0
    All these messages remind me of reports on the 1936-1937 war games. How it all ended, we all know.