Military Review

Russia relies on high-precision and high-performance weapons

30
High precision development weapons becomes the main priority of the state armament program, leads the newspaper News Statement by Vladimir Putin at the Collegium of the Ministry of Defense, held on December 22.




According to the president, special emphasis will need to be made on equipping the troops with “high-precision air, land and sea-based weapons, unmanned strike complexes, as well as means of individual equipment for military personnel, the latest intelligence, communications and electronic warfare systems.”

With this statement, Vladimir Putin summed up the many disputes about the new GPV, which have been going on for almost a year. With the beginning of the formation of the new program, the Russian defense industry was conditionally divided into two camps. Some advocated maximum funding for the construction of new "platforms": tanks, guns, planes, helicopters. Their opponents demanded to reduce the construction of platforms to a reasonable level and to allocate maximum funding to high-precision weapons: guided munitions, cruise, aeroballistic and hypersonic missiles. It was reasonably argued that even an old plane with new high-precision ammunition and missiles would receive serious opportunities. The debate of the "defense industry" became the most intense in November and December this year. But now Vladimir Putin has put an end to it. He supported supporters of precision weapons,
Military expert Vladislav Shurygin told the newspaper.

Sergei Shoigu also took their side. Thus, the Minister of Defense noted that high-precision missiles were used for the most important militant targets: Caliber, X-101, Iskander, X-55. It is noteworthy that Shoigu for the first time publicly acknowledged the fact of the use of the Iskander complexes in Syria. Earlier, the military department denied the use of these weapons systems in the fight against terrorists.

The division of weapons systems in the modern world into "platforms" and "ammunition" has already happened quite a long time ago.

If before the "platform" could not be without ammunition, then with the advent of high-precision weapons between their manufacturers began a serious competition. For example, is there a need for a country to buy a batch of new strike aircraft. Another option is to purchase high-precision missiles and refuse to purchase aircraft and other weapons systems. It is much more profitable to build "platforms" and then carry out their after-sales service and modernization for defense enterprises,
said independent military expert Anton Lavrov.

The experience of Syria has proved that special platforms are not needed for the use of Calibrov: atomic destroyers and aircraft carriers. Most of the launches were carried out from the sides of conventional diesel submarines and small rocket ships. The X-101 did not launch the PAK YES, but the upgraded Tu-95MSM bombers,
noted military historian Dmitry Boltenkov.

In the United States, the development of global non-nuclear strike systems (Promt Global Strike) has long been underway. These are hypersonic aircraft capable of hitting targets anywhere in the world with high precision in minutes.

What is a weapon for? I think with only one purpose - for blackmail, because there is an illusion of a possible impunity strike,
said Putin.

In his speech, Shoigu particularly noted the creation of a single radar field around Russia and the introduction of the Unified Space System (CEN) into operational and combat operations.

Since December, the Unified Space System has entered into operational combat duty
informed the minister.

The system works in conjunction with over-the-horizon radar stations located in Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan.

Vladimir Putin and Sergei Shoigu addressed an obvious message from the United States. The global non-nuclear strike no longer threatens Russia, as it was just recently. The Russian missile defense warning system, the formation of which is almost completed, has unique capabilities to counter such threats. The TSA will detect the launch of a rocket with hypersonic aircraft, and the Voronezh radar will take them to escort in the upper atmosphere and determine their targets,
said the chief editor of the Internet project Militaryrussia Dmitry Kornev.

Then, according to the expert, an effective retaliatory strike by the Russian strategic forces will follow.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Logall
    Logall 25 December 2017 09: 10 New
    13
    High-precision and supersonic nuclear-powered rocket - it's super efficient!
    Give Zircon ....!
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 25 December 2017 09: 14 New
      +8
      Hi Sanya! hi Ek rushing you in the morning! lol I agree with you, especially since the development of high-precision and hypersonic weapons does not imply the abandonment of other programs.
      1. Iaaa
        Iaaa 25 December 2017 09: 22 New
        +5
        Hi brothers! laughing soldier So it will shove. Finally we decided. And then rushed from one extreme to another. But it was.
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 25 December 2017 09: 24 New
          +5
          Kostya, hi! hi When everyone pulls the cart in their direction, there is no movement. Now we have decided on the direction - we are waiting for the movement and the results of this movement itself. wink
      2. Logall
        Logall 25 December 2017 09: 24 New
        +7
        Hi, Max!
        Writing
        Quote: Jedi
        Ek rushing you in the morning!

        I am writing that the period of acclimatization! I’m in Donetsk, Rostov ... Tomorrow I’m going to izvarno, to listen about Ukrainian high-precision ...
        Vacation took, Before the New Year!
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 25 December 2017 09: 26 New
          +5
          My friend, I’m joking. wink A vacation should be taken not only before, but also after the New Year. drinks
    2. svp67
      svp67 25 December 2017 09: 25 New
      +5
      Quote: Logall
      Give Zircon ....!

      “Zircon” is good, but giving Russian “Javelin” or “Spike” - that’s what you really need, GIVE the shock UAV, light, medium and heavy classes ... Yes, there’s a lot more that will save the life of the RUSSIAN SOLDIER.
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 25 December 2017 12: 22 New
      +2
      Quote: Logall
      Give Zircon ....!

      Say Zircon? High-precision weapons? And excuse me, are there carriers under these same Zircons? Are we building new warships in series to put this high-precision weapon on them? Neither new frigates nor new corvettes are built in series as a matter of fact ... what is the conversation then?
  2. Observer2014
    Observer2014 25 December 2017 09: 20 New
    +5
    But now Vladimir Putin has put an end to it. He supported the supporters of precision weapons
    I fully support our power in this matter. Why get involved in an arms race using the example of the USSR. If everything can be done with little blood, both figuratively and literally.
    1. svp67
      svp67 25 December 2017 09: 26 New
      +3
      Quote: Observer2014
      . Why get involved in an arms race on the example of the USSR.

      One trouble, the entire WTO is completely not cheap, and in this "game" we are still forced to take retaliatory steps and, moreover, we are not writing its rules ...
      1. just exp
        just exp 25 December 2017 10: 06 New
        +4
        why did you get that we are not writing the rules?
        we have our own brains, our own way.
        1. svp67
          svp67 25 December 2017 10: 10 New
          0
          Quote: just explo
          why did you get that we are not writing the rules?

          Because we are now in the position of CASTER. We are very much behind in this matter.
          Quote: just explo
          we have our own brains, our own way

          God forbid that these "brains" had enough to find her, otherwise many, they only work to replenish their personal account ....
          1. Lexus
            Lexus 25 December 2017 13: 45 New
            +1
            God forbid that these "brains" had enough to find her, otherwise many, they only work to replenish their personal account ....

            Those who are at the trough, this is quite satisfactory. It is much easier to rob and share the loot. But they are not accustomed to work and give.
  3. Alexander War
    Alexander War 25 December 2017 09: 23 New
    +2
    Honestly, in addition to the fact that in Syria we are fighting against terrorists, we tested all of our new products in real conditions! We tested our radars, tested other equipment on the F-22, we also tested the A-50U AWACS and made corrections to A- one hundred
    1. askort154
      askort154 25 December 2017 11: 15 New
      +3
      Александр War....Honestly, in addition to the fact that in Syria we are fighting against terrorists, we experienced all our new products in real conditions!

      During the fighting in Syria, 144 units of new weapons of various types were tested. About a dozen of them have not been tested.
      (from messages of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation).
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 25 December 2017 09: 36 New
    +1
    ... well, the days are gone when the BoNBs were thrown from the cockpit and shot at the flyers from the Nagans ...
  5. Alexander War
    Alexander War 25 December 2017 09: 36 New
    +2
    It's right to send such robots to the most dangerous fate!
  6. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 25 December 2017 09: 43 New
    +3
    Modern conditions of warfare dictate a new doctrine, which Russia must adhere to. High-precision weapons proved to be excellent.
  7. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 25 December 2017 09: 49 New
    +2
    In order that words would not seem ordinary balabolism, it is necessary to support them with concrete deeds.
    And without a strong economy, an adequate distribution of funds, the prudent use of these funds, you can talk about anything. How many ships are being built? How many new planes come into operation annually and is this quantity normal for such a huge size of the country? Why are the deadlines for putting into operation new developed tanks and aircraft postponed?
    There are a lot of such questions that need to be answered honestly! It’s possible how much you want to beat in the chest with your fist, that everything is fine with us and all pray, but if reality does not correspond to the slogans, then wait for unpleasant consequences yes
  8. Viktor.12.71
    Viktor.12.71 25 December 2017 09: 57 New
    +3
    High-precision and highly effective weapons without advanced electronics and subsequent miniaturization are impossible tasks.
  9. Altona
    Altona 25 December 2017 10: 07 New
    0
    Expensive rate of course.
  10. Aleksandr21
    Aleksandr21 25 December 2017 10: 18 New
    0
    In his speech, Shoigu particularly noted the creation of a single radar field around Russia and the introduction of the Unified Space System (CEN) into operational and combat operations.


    I wonder how we are doing with satellites in the framework of the CEN. Has the situation changed? Because the info for 2015 is rather sad.

    Forecast 71X6 (US-KMO - Unified System for Monitoring the Seas of the Oceans) in geostationary orbit

    “In total, 8 US-KMO spacecraft were launched, the first of which was launched on February 14, 1991. US-KMO spacecraft were launched using the Proton-K LV with the DM-2 RB.
    The launch of the last US-KMO device took place on March 30, 2012 from the platform 81P (launcher No. 24) of the Baikonur cosmodrome using the last of the remaining Proton-K launch vehicles with the latest DM-2 RB. However, as it became known in April 2014, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation lost the last satellite of the Oko-1 system, which worked out due to problems only two years instead of the planned five-seven. The two 73D6 remaining in orbit could only work a few hours a day. By early January 2015, they were out of order. "
  11. groks
    groks 25 December 2017 10: 53 New
    0
    They mean - for aggression, but not for aggression. Platforms are good, but experience has shown that they are not needed.
    One thing is clear - the defense will be bad.
  12. rotor
    rotor 25 December 2017 11: 02 New
    0
    In the United States, the development of global non-nuclear strike systems (Promt Global Strike) has long been underway. These are hypersonic aircraft capable of hitting targets anywhere in the world with high precision in minutes.


    Something in North Korea, we do not see any quick disarming global strike from the United States, so is it possible to take this Promt Global Strike seriously today.
  13. rotor
    rotor 25 December 2017 11: 08 New
    +1
    Old platforms can be robotic, so they still have great potential.
  14. True
    True 25 December 2017 11: 25 New
    +1
    Meli Emelya ....
  15. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 25 December 2017 12: 26 New
    +1
    M-d-ah! Really! It’s not possible to understand Russia with intelligence! Five times stepping on a rake (the same ones!) ... ten times rushing from one extreme to another ... and finally, choose what the “Western world” has chosen a long time ago ....! But even here - “not all praise be to God!” Russia has the same “special become”! And now, almost on the MIG-21 are going to put the latest missiles! If such a concept would "triumph" in the last century; now, they would try to send I-16 from X-59MK to Syria! In the last century, one famous science fiction writer had a "dream-idea": send to "global" space expeditions "starship" with a tool factory on board ... a "starship" flies "quietly", information from the Earth about scientific and technological progress is transmitted to it from the Earth .. technicians based on the information received rivet improvements on the ship .... sometimes , sit on any planet (asteroid) to more serious treason Niya to introduce .. And now, at the destination "miracle-yudo-techno - ,, whale" sits ... Well ... like ... the "Columbus caravel" sailed, and the Savannah atomic-ship sailed. Yes, figs Think about what will happen to the caravel if you try to connect the caravel to a nuclear reactor? belay If hypothetical dreams came true, at least once, then in the best case they would get a “caravel with a nuclear reactor”, but not a modern nuclear-powered ship! An expensive diamond needs an appropriate setting ... you cannot equip obsolete "platforms" with modern weapons! Weapons must be created in a complex (system): "weapon-platform / weapon-board
    forms "... and only transfer obsolete weapons to obsolete platform carriers. in order to: a) extend the combat effectiveness of the obsolete complex for a while until the number of new weapons is sufficient; b) if there is a" niche "for obsolete equipment: for example, the fight against the "barmaley" .... (you can "keep it at home"; or you can sell it to the "neighbors" for good money).
  16. iouris
    iouris 25 December 2017 15: 32 New
    0
    Explain which is more important: high precision or high performance? I can’t figure it out myself.
    1. gridasov
      gridasov 26 December 2017 01: 31 New
      0
      In fact, high performance is a complex parameter that includes the same precision and optimized flight speed and ease of manufacture and low cost (if necessary), etc. And as you know, precision is limited only by this. And secondly, only that is worth noting. that everyone lies and their eyes don’t blink. . Everything is so beautifully flooded about the potential capabilities and the so-called new weapons, but in reality everything is on the old physical. principles and old technologies in which Russia undoubtedly lags behind the armies and the USA and others, at least because the level of engineering lags behind. In general, the same "cubes" are trying to stack like this. to get a new structure, which is impossible and that means you need to introduce a new parameter, which no one has as a new or discovery or invention.
  17. Herman 4223
    Herman 4223 27 December 2017 07: 30 New
    0
    What kind of choice is strange, or is it or that? The sense of a cruise missile if the plane is 40 or more years old, it just may not fly up at the right time or not fly, the old technique is old and the updates here do not always help. Or go to battle in capsule of Almaty or in a powder keg T80,72 is a big difference for the crew. Su 57 is easier to approach the point of impact than su27 because it is less visible. The development of both weapons and platforms should be equivalent, without distortions in any direction.