Military Review

For the Russian Aerospace Force created two new missiles

83
Russian sources revealed the designation of a new high-precision cruise missile for the Far aviation. Ammunition received an X-50 index. The deployment of a new missile is planned as part of the state arms program for 2018-2025.


The product developed by Dubna ICD Raduga is supposedly a subsonic cruise missile using the strategic X-101 guidance system, but smaller in size and flight range. Designed for placement in the internal compartments of the Tu-22М3, Tu-95 and Tu-160 rocket carriers, the projectile is six meters long, its curb weight is on the order of 1600 kilograms. Equipped with a turbofan engine, the rocket develops a cruising speed of the order of 700 km / h, a military blog reported BMPD citing Jane's Missiles & Rockets magazine.

For the Russian Aerospace Force created two new missiles


The X-50 fuselage has a flattened cross-section and side faces. This form reduces the radar visibility of the rocket and is optimal for placement in the turret launchers Tu-95 and Tu-160. The strategic X-101, due to the large length, does not fit into the weapons compartment of the Tu-95 and can only be used with pylons under the wings.

The navigation system of the new rocket is a combination: inertial at the march segment, when approaching the target, the digital optical-optical correlation system "Reflections" is activated. In addition to being inconspicuous, the X-50 uses low-altitude flight trajectory and an airborne defense complex consisting of an active jamming station and towed traps to overcome air defense systems. The warhead can be of two types: penetrating for protected purposes or a cassette - to destroy, for example, airfields.

After upgrading, long-range missile carriers Tu-22М3 will be able to carry six X-50 in the internal compartment and two missiles on the external sling. The Tu-160 is able to take on 12 missiles, and the Tu-95 - 14, including six under the wings.

The military name of another development, designed to work in a strong air defense, has not yet been disclosed. It is being created within the framework of the Hypersonic Guided Missile (GZUR) program by the Tactical Missiles Corporation and the Raduga ICD. The projectile has similar to X-50 weight and size characteristics and range. The speed of the GZUR in flight along the altitude profile is 6М. The projectile has an active-passive homing head and is intended mainly for hitting ships.

By 2020, it is assumed that the GZUR will be mass-produced at a rate of "up to 50 products per year," the newspaper writes. This suggests that the rocket is currently being tested.
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. hrych
    hrych 22 December 2017 15: 29
    19
    With nuclear warheads, a thousand range will increase, and the Tu22M3 will become the carrier of strategic cruise missiles, and the Tu-95 will remove them from the spring suspension, which will significantly affect flight performance. Good good This is how the Warsaw women became strategic carriers at the expense of the Caliber, also our range has become something more wink
    1. Iline
      Iline 22 December 2017 16: 22
      +7
      The new Russian X-50 cruise missile will be able to hit targets at ranges of up to 1,5 kilometers, according to an article by Peter Butovsky for Jane's Missiles & Rockets.

      This is a quote from an article in the Feed. Or a typo, or incomprehensible needs of our MO. The same "old woman" X-555 with comparable dimensions has a much greater range and could not fit into the Tu-22M3. How at the same size will fit the X-50? Even when carrying out improvements on these sides. Decided to increase the length of the aircraft?
      Most likely we are talking about finalizing precisely the X-555 model for new realities. New engine, new equipment (although from the new - jamming station), a modified glider.
      Something guys fooled out of topic. And I won’t believe that our Moscow Region shared its plans with them.
      1. BABAY22
        BABAY22 22 December 2017 16: 46
        0
        By the way. Dear author, so how many wings are there on the Tu-95? You seem to have rockets in the inner compartment and under the wings. And at the same time I am interested in the question: How many strips are on the vest?
      2. hrych
        hrych 22 December 2017 17: 10
        0
        Quote: Iline
        X-555 with comparable dimensions

        The meaning of the created product is precisely fitting to the Tu22M3, respectively, its dimensions in the article can be exaggerated, and if we compare with the X-101 contours, it is unlikely to be more than 5 meters
      3. hrych
        hrych 22 December 2017 17: 23
        0
        Perhaps something like this if you focus on the diameter
        1. Lexus
          Lexus 22 December 2017 19: 52
          +1
          Interestingly, but the engine is finally placed inside, or left retractable?
          1. Mih1974
            Mih1974 22 December 2017 22: 26
            +1
            And what did he forget inside?
            1. Lexus
              Lexus 22 December 2017 22: 59
              0
              The same as in "Caliber" and all other Kyrgyz Republic in the world
              1. Mih1974
                Mih1974 22 December 2017 23: 00
                +1
                And the engine does not extend in the collibre. belay ?
                Learn the mat part. bully
                1. Lexus
                  Lexus 22 December 2017 23: 11
                  +1
                  3M14. The triangular notch before the plumage is the air intake in front of the turbojet engine. Especially for "experts" materiel.
                  1. Mih1974
                    Mih1974 22 December 2017 23: 15
                    +1
                    belay repeat
                    litter, beguiled a little, I remembered just a video with 101_vy. lol
      4. alexmach
        alexmach 22 December 2017 17: 26
        +1
        X-555 with comparable dimensions has a much greater range and could not fit into the Tu-22M3. How, at the same size will fit the X-50?

        So that its size is reduced compared to 555?
        X-55, X-555 and X-100 (1) they seem to be about the same size.
        1. Iline
          Iline 22 December 2017 17: 36
          +3
          X-100 is 1,5 meters longer. And it became critical for placing this missile on the Tu-95 in the cargo bay. X-55 is slightly less than 6 meters, X-555 is slightly longer, but not fundamentally. For the X-50, a length of 6 meters is declared. Hence the question arises with the placement on the Tu-22M3. The airframe profile is of no fundamental importance (round or triangular) for placement on a drum set. This is a tribute to the "stealth."
          1. anjey
            anjey 22 December 2017 19: 34
            +2
            with such a profile, missiles more enter the round drum ...
          2. abrakadabre
            abrakadabre 23 December 2017 17: 04
            0
            The airframe profile is of no fundamental importance (round or triangular) for placement on a drum set.
            With such a sub-triangular profile, the drum can be made a little, but smaller in diameter. That is, the layout of the missiles in the drum is denser
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 22 December 2017 17: 23
      0
      The geometry is well thought out for the clip. I wonder how many of these pieces fit in the clip?
      1. Iline
        Iline 22 December 2017 17: 38
        +3
        Six. And geometry has nothing to do with it. On MKU and round missiles exactly 6 are placed.
        1. Orionvit
          Orionvit 22 December 2017 17: 51
          +2
          Quote: Iline
          Six. And geometry has nothing to do with it

          Hello, on the B-52, with the same geometry of the missiles, nine “tamahawks” fit on the drum, against six round X-55s on the TUSHKI.
          1. Iline
            Iline 22 December 2017 19: 08
            +3
            The dimensions of the cargo compartment (diameter) do not want to compare at the same time? For interest, see at least a video of the use of the X-101 with the Tu-160 in Syria (shooting from the cargo compartment of the moment of missile discharge). There you will see the gap between the skin and the rocket on the drum.
            1. Orionvit
              Orionvit 22 December 2017 20: 29
              0
              Quote: Iline
              The dimensions of the cargo compartment (diameter) do not want to compare at the same time?

              No, I don’t want, but why? And the hedgehog is clear that if you pack something denser, then more will enter it. True, there is a limitation on the X-55, these are additional fuel tanks that go beyond the dimensions of the missiles.
              1. Lexus
                Lexus 22 December 2017 23: 32
                +1
                True, there is a limitation on the X-55, these are additional fuel tanks

                On the X-55SM and X-555
          2. Lexus
            Lexus 22 December 2017 23: 35
            +1
            on the B-52, with the same rocket geometry, nine tamahawks fit on the drum

            The standard American "drum" holds 8 ALCM-B (C) missiles. "Tomahawks", as far as I know, with the B-52 was tested on an external sling.
        2. anjey
          anjey 22 December 2017 19: 36
          0
          as I understood from the article, that 95 will go 8 ..., against 6 - x55 ...
    3. RASKAT
      RASKAT 22 December 2017 19: 54
      0
      No, the new subsonic with a usual charge will probably have a range from 1000 to 2000 km. With the NSC under 3000km, which is also not a little, now taking off from under Smolensk you can shoot all over Europe, and even fly to Madrid am
      We look forward to even smaller missiles, a whole series with ranges from 200 to 1000km.
      1. anjey
        anjey 22 December 2017 21: 43
        0
        I’m wondering how the type of charge affects the range? A missile is a finished product and originally sharpened for apples ... it’s as if strategic, but can be used as a tactical one ...
        1. RASKAT
          RASKAT 22 December 2017 22: 01
          0
          It's simple, the rocket uses liquid fuel and the nuclear warhead weighs much less than conventional. They put an additional tank with fuel in the empty volume and the rocket flies on.
          1. anjey
            anjey 23 December 2017 03: 19
            +1
            I have not heard of such manipulations with the tanks, do you think if 2500km flies from the apple, then it will fly less with the usual warhead, since the additional tank will be removed? I always thought that the combat compartment was unified in volume ... at least on the x-55 ...
            1. RASKAT
              RASKAT 23 December 2017 06: 56
              +1
              The compartment is not unified, the missiles are different. No warhead rearranges, they are installed from the factory. For example X-101 and X-102.
              1. anjey
                anjey 23 December 2017 07: 51
                0
                I won’t argue, it’s possible, it’s different telemetry, though missiles from the same storage can have different tasks, with different warheads, so a universal combat compartment is convenient to operate ..., for example, five missiles with a conventional BB suppress the air defense system and the sixth carries the apple to the goal ...
              2. anjey
                anjey 23 December 2017 07: 53
                +1
                they don’t deliver nuclear warheads from the factory in the rocket for sure, they are on special storage ..
  2. Magic archer
    Magic archer 22 December 2017 15: 39
    +4
    The good news! It would be nice to create something like the American LASM on their base. A long-range PCR with stealth technology. But in general, on the basis of such missiles you can create a whole family. Yes, and the troops have no good anti-radar missile.
    1. hrych
      hrych 22 December 2017 15: 47
      +6
      Quote: Magic Archer
      on their basis create something like the Americanos LRASM

      Oh no no As a strategic missile with a relief envelope, it’s wonderful, but there is nothing to go around over water, it is the Americans to study and study with us, we have supersonic missiles, and the RCC Caliber, in the final section, also switches to supersonic. This article also speaks of similar weight and size characteristics with a certain GZUR, which will tear open the belly of enemy dreadnoughts in 6 swoops laughing So, it’s too early for the Tu22M3 to lose the specialization of “aircraft carrier killers” laughing
    2. Rushnairfors
      Rushnairfors 22 December 2017 15: 50
      +5
      Tu22m3 has not yet become anyone, but if this miraculous judo enters our armaments, I personally will be very happy
      1. Mih1974
        Mih1974 22 December 2017 22: 29
        +1
        And here is how the final mattresses will get numb - we will fasten back the 22nd tanker rod tongue tongue then laughter.
    3. Romario_Argo
      Romario_Argo 22 December 2017 18: 49
      0
      LRASM-A is RCC / SLCM / SLCV can strike both on "ships" and on the "surface"
      and X-50 is an analogue of LRASM-A, in addition, a smaller version of X-101 to increase the BK YES: Tu-160М, Tu-95MS, Tu-22М3
  3. zzdimk
    zzdimk 22 December 2017 15: 42
    +2
    This news will lead to an increase in US military cuts, oh - the budget.
  4. NEXUS
    NEXUS 22 December 2017 15: 45
    +5
    About the range, not a word ... if it is less than X-101, then I think the range will be something in the region of 2-3 thousand. At the same time, if you equip such a nuclear warhead missile, which will undoubtedly be smaller in mass, and the range will increase.
    It is being created as part of the Hypersonic Guided Rocket (GZUR) program by the Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation and the Rainbow Design Bureau. The projectile has mass and size characteristics similar to the X-50 and flight range. The speed of GZUR when flying along the altitude profile is 6M. The projectile has an active-passive homing head and is intended primarily for hitting ships.

    But this is much more interesting ... apparently got documentation on the X-90 "Gela" ...
    1. hrych
      hrych 22 December 2017 15: 49
      +2
      The declared range with a land mine of more than 1500 kilometers, with nuclear warheads, respectively, 1,5-2 times further
      https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3016213.html
      Quote: NEXUS
      the range will be something in the region of 2-3 thousand

      Feel free to count on 2,5 thousand drinks
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 22 December 2017 15: 53
        +2
        [quote] [quote = grunt] The declared range with a land mine of 1600 kilometers, with a nuclear warhead, respectively, 1,5-2 times further [/ quote]
        You confuse ... the article says about - [quote] curb weight of the order of 1600 kilograms[/quote XNUMX... about the range of not a word ...
        1. hrych
          hrych 22 December 2017 15: 56
          +2
          I added a link
        2. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 23 December 2017 04: 46
          0
          In another source, approximately, 1500 km was indicated
    2. Sergei1982
      Sergei1982 22 December 2017 15: 50
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      About the range, not a word ... if it is less than X-101, then I think the range will be something in the region of 2-3 thousand. At the same time, if you equip such a nuclear warhead missile, which will undoubtedly be smaller in mass, and the range will increase.
      It is being created as part of the Hypersonic Guided Rocket (GZUR) program by the Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation and the Rainbow Design Bureau. The projectile has mass and size characteristics similar to the X-50 and flight range. The speed of GZUR when flying along the altitude profile is 6M. The projectile has an active-passive homing head and is intended primarily for hitting ships.

      But this is much more interesting ... apparently got documentation on the X-90 "Gela" ...

      They say https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3016213.html It is expected that a rocket equipped with a turbofan engine developed by Omsk Motor Engineering Design Bureau JSC (OMKB) Product 37-04 (or turbofan-50B) reaches a range of more than 1500 km, with a cruising speed of 700 km / h and a top speed of 950 km / h.

      1500 km.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 22 December 2017 15: 55
        +3
        Quote: Sergei1982
        "Product 37-04" (or TRDD-50B), reaches a range of more than 1500 km

        I am wondering if this KR can hang on the SU-34? Will it allow long ...
        1. Sergei1982
          Sergei1982 22 December 2017 16: 46
          +2
          Quote: NEXUS
          I am wondering if this KR will be able to hang on the SU-34? Will it allow it to be long ..

          There was an interview with Obnosov that on the approach a series of TSAs for 200,400,600 and 1000 km. It is a pity there is no Ancient, perhaps he did not enlighten.
          1. opus
            opus 22 December 2017 17: 08
            +1
            "what's on the way for the TSA series on 200,400,600,1000"
            Still Aviation ejection device according to the asp on 1000 km made
            And then it does not climb on the su-34
  5. Pacifist
    Pacifist 22 December 2017 15: 49
    +1
    Here is the answer to the American lionfish AGM-158C LRASM. good
    1. opus
      opus 22 December 2017 17: 01
      +1
      LRSAM ANTI-PORTABLE!
      wink
      Long Range Anti- Ship Missile is a long-range anti-ship missile.
      This is not an answer
      1. Pacifist
        Pacifist 22 December 2017 17: 06
        +2
        Of course, I could be wrong, but as far as I remember, there was a decision to unify the targets. Based on this, I can with a high degree of probability assume that the ships will be on the list of targets. So, while there is no direct negation from the developer, I prefer to remain with my opinion. Especially given the hints of the characteristics of the second rocket. hi
        1. Vlad.by
          Vlad.by 22 December 2017 18: 17
          +1
          Why the hell do you need seriously subsonic anti-ship missiles if there is an excellent set with a supersonic flight profile and more than enough range?
          Here is the second with 6M and a quasi-ballistic profile - it's a bomb!
      2. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 23 December 2017 04: 59
        0
        Quote: opus
        This is not an answer

        For your money, any whim! We will do anti-ship!
        But "GZUR" can be called a "otvetka" on the AGM-158C LRASM
  6. svp67
    svp67 22 December 2017 15: 52
    +3
    The X-50 fuselage has a flattened cross section and side faces.
    It is very interesting that something tells me that based on it, something may appear for the Su-57 ... for solving "special problems"
    1. san4es
      san4es 22 December 2017 16: 07
      +4
      Quote: svp67
      ... something tells me that on its base may appear, something for the Su-57 ...

      ... Probably (external) resemblance to LRASM

  7. gerkost2012
    gerkost2012 22 December 2017 16: 02
    +3
    All this is impressive, but 50 products per year, it will not be enough! It launches its missiles in great numbers. It is clear that a huge number of Tomahawks can even break through a serious Russian missile defense. Remains a strike on carriers of the Kyrgyz Republic ahead of schedule?
    1. hrych
      hrych 22 December 2017 16: 15
      +2
      They rely on non-nuclear, high-precision weapons and their mass character, and on nuclear-strategic ones. Therefore, 50 strategic missiles are a very formidable component of the Triad.
      1. siberalt
        siberalt 22 December 2017 17: 29
        0
        6 meters above the surface - a plague for enemy ships. belay
    2. opus
      opus 22 December 2017 17: 03
      +4
      But 50 products per year, it will not be enough! Iya its own rockets stamped in zelo great quantity

      The USSR at the peak in 1988-89 was able to master 80-90 units a year (3M-10 or options).
      What do you want from us?
      1. Vlad.by
        Vlad.by 22 December 2017 18: 20
        +2
        Yes, and why? enough for a local conflict.
        For a serious mess - they will no longer be needed.
        Those who survive nicer will be AK with zinc cartridges.
        1. opus
          opus 22 December 2017 18: 47
          +1
          Well. The more the better.
          And about ak yes. Right
      2. Krabik
        Krabik 23 December 2017 23: 37
        0
        For 30 years, software and automation have stepped far forward.

        Won Ilon Musk on printers spare parts for space engines stamps in his factory.

        Perhaps more is not necessary - this is my only answer ...
        1. Vlad.by
          Vlad.by 26 December 2017 15: 57
          0
          In Rybinsk, turbine blades also make additive technologies. So what?
          With the Mask, the Americans are still sipping on the lightest.
          Only a trick can be cheap in space.
          And there that he and on what stamps is already uninteresting
  8. rosomaha
    rosomaha 22 December 2017 16: 38
    0
    The new CD is good. But why not reduce it so that the Tu-160 includes 24 pieces, otherwise there is no difference from the X101, except for the range. The Tu-95 revolving launcher is designed for 6 missiles, and after modernization it has 8 more external nodes. Also, this CR must be adapted to tactical carriers (Su-30/34/35, and, if possible, to the MiG-35) as a long arm. Those. in terms of deployment and TTX capabilities, it should correspond to AGM-158B (practically any digital board with a payload of approx. 1,5 t can be a carrier). The optimal size would be like the X-59mk2, but the range is ok 1000km, KVO 3m, warhead ok 450kg.
    1. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 22 December 2017 18: 22
      +1
      Do not drive horses. If there is a stone, there will first be a slingshot, then a sling.
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  10. turbris
    turbris 22 December 2017 17: 49
    0
    It’s good that we practically don’t know anything about new missiles, and we don’t need anyone to guess. But the fact that the Tu-22M3 is becoming the carrier of strategic cruise missiles is very good news, now it’s not necessary to overcome air defense either ..
    1. Rushnairfors
      Rushnairfors 22 December 2017 18: 52
      +2
      It does not become anything yet, x32 first let's accept, and only then we will swing at x50. And then a stone flower does not come out of this AUR.
      1. Vlad.by
        Vlad.by 25 December 2017 02: 13
        0
        X32 is already fit to disarm. Too big, too capricious to use rocket. Although the idea is not without appeal.
    2. anjey
      anjey 23 December 2017 03: 05
      0
      2500 km is not such a long range for strategists, both aircraft and missiles will have to overcome air defense, crushing air defense systems with these missiles ...
      1. abc_alex
        abc_alex 24 December 2017 00: 24
        0
        Why all of a sudden? 2500 km of range will allow shelling almost any country in Europe, including Britain, from Russian territory. Except maybe Portugal. From the base in Syria to control the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Peninsula, shoot in Pakistan or Afghanistan, in any country of the Balkan Peninsula and even in Poland.
        For the Tu-22M3 which, in essence, is a "European strategy" it is an excellent weapon. Without leaving the territories controlled by Russia, you can control the whole of Europe.

        And in the Far East from our territory, Japan and South Korea are under fire with a reserve, from Alaska from Chukotka and Sakhalin.

        Well, if you build a base for the Tu-22M3 in Cuba, then almost the entire Atlantic coast of the United States, including Washington, will be in jeopardy.

        Note, this is all provided that the planes do not leave the airspace of Russia, Syria and Cuba.
        1. anjey
          anjey 24 December 2017 18: 12
          0
          if we take the potential adversaries of the usa, then the range of 2500 km along the continental part of the usa is not enough, interceptors and the air defense system will not let us in neutral waters ... although there is x-102 there is much more and the apple is present ..
          1. abc_alex
            abc_alex 25 December 2017 01: 14
            0
            That's right. For Europe - one missile, for the USA another. But the carrier aircraft is the same.
          2. Vlad.by
            Vlad.by 25 December 2017 02: 19
            0
            Are you going to let something across the US? Sorry, but the first, in any case, will fly ICBMs, and whether after the exchange of the YU Tu-22 they will still be a big question.
            Their use is possible only in local conflict and not with NATO. Although, as a club, he is certainly good.
            1. anjey
              anjey 25 December 2017 08: 39
              0
              that alarm 95, as a strategist, should already be in the air after 45 minutes after adding it, at least with one cr with apple, I don’t know now what has changed, well, the enemy’s flight time ..., too, Tu-22 strategist, so the requirements are one ...
            2. abc_alex
              abc_alex 25 December 2017 18: 11
              0
              There is such a concept of "pre-war period." This is the time when everyone has already realized that war is inevitable. So, during this period, missile carriers are on duty in the sky with nuclear weapons on board. Shift day and night. At the time of the attack in this way, some part of the missile-carrying aircraft will necessarily be in the air at the turn of the weapon.
              By the way, the advantage of new domestic missiles is that the boundaries of the use of weapons in aircraft can be located over Russian territory.
              1. anjey
                anjey 26 December 2017 07: 36
                0
                God forbid, if anything, it will be like in 1941, they will always attack suddenly, your theory of the pre-war period is not suitable and not beneficial to the enemy, and it is not so simple as it seems to you to give an order to use nuclear weapons ....
                1. Vlad.by
                  Vlad.by 26 December 2017 15: 52
                  0
                  There was already such a period - the Caribbean crisis.
                  Also, the inevitable seemed possible. But settled. Although, you are right - the state of military danger, when the air smells of gunpowder, may well be voiced. But, to burn the aviation resource by shift duty of a third of the sides is suicidal. So only take off on a signal from SPRN, and then .... darkness.
                  1. abc_alex
                    abc_alex 26 December 2017 23: 31
                    0
                    your theory of the pre-war period is not suitable and not beneficial to the enemy, and it is not so simple as it seems to you to give an order to use nuclear weapons ....


                    This is not my theory. This is a basic concept. It is present in the plans of all the armies of the world. No army is ever deployed 100% all the time.

                    But, to burn the aviation resource by shift duty of a third of the sides is suicidal.


                    And what's the point of saving airplanes if one of the first attacks is delivered to airfields? This is not the period of the “Caribbean crisis”; now a massive missile strike on our territory will not leave a chance to fly up to those who are not in the air. Maybe not a third of the planes, but they will keep a significant part in the air.
  11. anjey
    anjey 22 December 2017 19: 46
    0
    oh no no As a strategic rocket with envelope relief is wonderful, but there is nothing to go around over water
    a rocket goes over the sea with an envelope of the bottom topography, with the help of a Doppler meter of reflected frequencies, routes are prepared in advance with the help of satellites, the topography is completely scanned from the launch zone to the target ..., strategic stationary targets and missiles with apples are meant ...
  12. Berkut24
    Berkut24 22 December 2017 19: 47
    +2
    They sometimes know how to please for the holiday. Both us and the NATO. Holiday greetings!
  13. Machete
    Machete 22 December 2017 22: 41
    0
    Economy rocket?
    In order not to spend expensive X-101 for firing on sparrows, such as ISIS?
    1. anjey
      anjey 23 December 2017 03: 10
      0
      what are you talking about, it’s also possible to put a vigorous warhead into it, which is why there is a lot to save ... but you’ve trained well on the igil ...
  14. Old26
    Old26 23 December 2017 18: 51
    0
    Quote: hrych
    With nuclear warheads, a thousand range will increase, and the Tu22M3 will become the carrier of strategic cruise missiles, and the Tu-95 will remove them from the spring suspension, which will significantly affect flight performance. Good

    Yeah. And after that, we will need to reduce not only the number of warheads on our ballistic missiles, but also not to deploy many of them from the word AT ALL.. And in the open materials on the "product 715" (9A5015) there is not a word about the possible use of nuclear warheads

    Quote: Iline
    This is a quote from an article in the Feed. Or a typo, or incomprehensible needs of our MO. The same "old woman" X-555 with comparable dimensions has a much greater range and could not fit into the Tu-22M3. How at the same size will fit the X-50? Even when carrying out improvements on these sides. Decided to increase the length of the aircraft?

    Well, comrade, The second name of the Tape, if you know - TAPE LIE. They try to blurt out earlier than others and sometimes they get a bunch. The open press on the topic of new missiles says that the range of 1500 km is in the future GZUR.
    But the range at the X-50 I met (though I can not judge the reliability of the source) is 3000 km. Now, as for the old X-555. She could get into the TU-22M3 bomb bay. Revolving launcher PU MKU-6-5U did not fit in the bomb bay. And the rocket itself could fit in. But what is the point of putting there 1, maximum 2 rockets?

    Quote: hrych
    The meaning of the created product is precisely fitting to the Tu22M3, respectively, its dimensions in the article can be exaggerated, and if we compare with the X-101 contours, it is unlikely to be more than 5 meters

    The length has already been announced - 6 meters.

    Quote: alexmach
    So that its size is reduced compared to 555?
    X-55, X-555 and X-100 (1) they seem to be about the same size.

    Compared to the X-55, the length of the X-50 will increase (according to open sources) as much as 12 centimeters, compared with the X-kkSM, the X-555 will decrease by 4 centimeters, compared with X1-1 it will decrease by almost a half meter

    Quote: anjey
    as I understood from the article, that 95 will go 8 ..., against 6 - x55 ...

    8 on the external sling. In fact, the TU-95MSM will be able to carry 14 missiles. : in the bomb bay and 8 on 4 nodes of the suspension under the wing.
    1. Mimoprohodil
      Mimoprohodil 24 December 2017 11: 33
      0
      Quote: Old26
      The open press on the topic of new missiles says that the range of 1500 km is in the future GZUR.

      Something too fantastic characteristics of this rocket, with a weight of 1.5 tons. Zircon at least as Onyx weighs
  15. Old26
    Old26 24 December 2017 14: 29
    0
    Quote: Mimoprohodil
    Something too fantastic characteristics of this rocket, with a weight of 1.5 tons. Zircon at least as Onyx weighs

    Yes, fantastic. Therefore, I wrote that the information is from a source that cannot be verified as to reliability. Although, there is one detail that is not directly related to this topic.

    Many of you must have heard such a nickname as Dancomm
    This comrade from the acting. Serves somewhere "above." Most likely it is the official source of the "discharge" of very metered information into the network.
    What is most characteristic is that almost everything he talks about (makes a "drain") is almost always subsequently confirmed. I will give just two examples.
    His "notes" for the year 2012 and the year 2016.

    Following 2012 of the year
    As part of the OCD, the Liner upgraded the Sineva rocket, which is in service. The creation of another modification of it continues. Work is underway to create an amazing Zircon system.

    In 2012, we have not heard anything about Zircon. Yes, and he, as you see the phrase only about an amazing system. But regarding another modification of the “Sineva” - confirmation of it slipped through the press only in 2016. This is a new modification under the designation "LEADER". He, Dankomm, once said that "there is a family. - mother and two little sons." Having deciphered later that mother is SINEVA, one of the "little sons" - "LINER", but the name of the second appeared only in 2016 - "LEADER". But what was characteristic was the information that was from him 3 years before.

    Now, regarding the results of 2016.
    Tests of Zircon are underway, while everything is successful. Development of two new “minerals” startedalready replacing Zircon. One - evolutionary developmentsecond - revolutionary

    In aviation.
    Work is underway to modernize the existing fleet of carriers and the production of TSA for him. Created several promising cruise missilesIn addition to X-101/102.

    Regarding the first part. If one of the samples is an evolutionary path of development ZIRCON, that is, without noticeable changes in mass-dimensional characteristics and range, then the second - BREAKTHROUGH? What does breakthrough mean? Maybe this is an increased range with smaller dimensions and weight? We'll have to wait for new information.
    While summing up everything that was written about these two products, we can say the following

    Rocket X-50.
    It is equipped with a combined guidance system using ANNs, GPS / GLONASS corrections in the marching section and the electronic reflection correlation system "Glint" in the final section. The Gleam system is an analogue of the American DSMAC system.

    TTX
    The engine is "product 37-04".
    Length - 6 m
    Weight - 1600 kg
    Range - up to 3000 km (IMHO 1500 km - too low)
    Cruising speed - 700 km / h
    Maximum speed - 950 km / h
    Types of military equipment
    • penetrating warhead type BS-715P
    • cluster warhead type BS-715K
    • nuclear warhead missing from the word TOTALLY
    Media
    • strategic bombers TU-160, TU-160M ​​and TU-160M2 (for the future)
    • TU-95MSM strategic bombers (6 missiles per MKU in the bomb bay) and TU-95MSM (14 missiles. Of these, 6 in the bomb bay, 8 on four underwing pylons)
    • a heavy TU-22M3M bomber with a revolver launcher in the bomb bay (most likely this missile can be suspended on the MKU-6-1, which was previously intended for X-15 missiles)
    • tactical aviation aircraft SU-34, SU-35S, SU-30SM

    Rocket GZUR.
    While the rocket is known by the abbreviation GZUR - a hypersonic guided missile. What will be the index X - ??? - not yet known.
    Guidance system - passive-active radar guidance head "GRAN-75". Broadband Passive Path - GRAN-75PC

    TTX
    The engine is "product 70".
    Length - 6 m
    Weight - 1500 kg
    Range - up to 1500 km in altitude flight profile
    Cruising speed - 6M
    Types of military equipment
    • warhead types are unknown, but most likely something similar to the X-50 missile, since these missiles are hypersonic and anti-ship (our anti-ship complex is Zircon)
    • nuclear warhead missing from the word TOTALLY
    Media
    • not yet known, but it is possible that the same carriers as the X-50 missiles
  16. SPLV
    SPLV 25 December 2017 08: 43
    0
    The strategic X-101, due to its long length, does not fit into the armament compartment of the Tu-95 and can only be used with pylons under the wings.

    Cool. I did not know that the 95 is a biplane.