Military Review

The first serial Mi-28HM will be produced before the end of the 2018 of the year.

46
The Russian Ministry of Defense and the Russian Helicopters holding signed a state contract for the production of an installation batch of upgraded Mi-28HM helicopters, the first two cars will be made before the end of 2018, the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper reported on Monday.


As Deputy Defense Minister Yury Borisov noted, the appearance of the Mi-28HM differs significantly from the basic version of the Mi-28Н helicopter.

The first serial Mi-28HM will be produced before the end of the 2018 of the year.


First of all, the functionality of the combat vehicle has been improved by changing the ergonomics of the crew cabin and installing a backup helicopter control system in the cockpit of the pilot-operator. The car acquired a modified fuselage, upgraded engines, an onboard complex of electronic equipment and a sight-sight system, a new auxiliary power unit, communications equipment with unmanned aerial vehicles.
- said Borisov, whose words are quoted by the publication.

The laser defense complex also serves to increase the combat survivability of the helicopter. A control system weapons allows you to use at long distances guided missiles with laser and radar guidance systems.

Planned installation on the Mi-28HM nashlemnoy target designation and guidance. Together with the all-around radar of a circular view, it will significantly increase the effectiveness of the Night Hunter in all weather conditions.
- noted Yuri Borisov.

We decided that further contracting of the "twenty-eighth" vehicles will be conducted in favor of the Mi-28HM
- stressed the deputy head of the Ministry of Defense.
Photos used:
Sergey Wieniawski / RIA News
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Teberii
    Teberii 18 December 2017 11: 29
    +5
    Syrian experience in implementation.
    1. Antidote
      Antidote 18 December 2017 11: 34
      +9
      Is it now fashionable to write off any modernization to Syria? What 28 raw was known 10 years ago.
      1. Sergey53
        Sergey53 18 December 2017 12: 46
        +1
        Quote: Antidote
        Is it now fashionable to write off any modernization to Syria? What 28 raw was known 10 years ago.

        By the way, not a word has been said about taking into account the Syrian experience of change.
        1. Antidote
          Antidote 19 December 2017 15: 01
          +1
          Because the bureaucratic machine is soooo lethargic and inertial, the real results of the Syrian experience, in iron, will be visible in 8-10 years.
  2. Magic archer
    Magic archer 18 December 2017 11: 36
    +8
    Until we create a NEW anti-tank missile, we’ll spin on the spot! We still haven’t realized the principle of shot-and-forget! Therefore, the helicopter needs to hang and illuminate the target! And then what was the use of the over-muzzle radar ?! fired and “dumped”, but ours found, fired, and weighs, waits ... by the sea for weather or answers from the enemy
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 18 December 2017 11: 43
      +7
      Hang at a speed of 240km \ h? Is it called hanging? Well, OK.
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer 18 December 2017 11: 50
        +1
        Did I indicate the speed ?! Wipe your eyes, Muvka, before you blurt out the bullshit. Under the action of ambushes and in the conditions of counteracting air defense, such a missile is vital
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 18 December 2017 11: 54
          +5
          Do you know the meaning of the word hover? Show me at least one video of launching a ptur from a helicopter in Syria, where the display shows zero speed. At least one !.
          1. Magic archer
            Magic archer 18 December 2017 11: 57
            0
            That is, you prefer to stand still?! And fight with weapons from the last century?! What does the video have to do with it ?! Do you think that we will always fight against barmels who do not have anti-aircraft defense? desires
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 18 December 2017 12: 01
              +4
              Because you have no arguments. And you cannot answer for your words. You say that our helicopters hang in place when they release ATGMs, but you can’t confirm your words. And hiding behind the building is an extremely specific opportunity, very often inaccessible, because not all there are 9 floors. But the cost of missiles is increasing seriously.
              1. Magic archer
                Magic archer 18 December 2017 12: 06
                +1
                Yes, as I understand it, you don’t understand what it is all about. What are the arguments? At a speed of 240 km, and even with our optics, and even if the enemy has air defense systems, I think our helicopter pilots have little chance of hitting targets. But you it does not explain, live in your pink world, cheers patriot
                1. Muvka
                  Muvka 18 December 2017 12: 08
                  +2
                  Well, can you prove that when the Mi-28s start up their guns, they hang in place? It is to prove, and not to speculate extensively.
                  1. _Jack_
                    _Jack_ 18 December 2017 15: 14
                    +1
                    you will not argue that the video is completely clear that the helicopter is forced to be in the line of sight all the time the missile is flying? (a missile is guided by a laser beam, that is, you can’t hide behind a hill for example) is this your risk to the crew? when launching a rocket, the helicopter will immediately be unmasked and will be attacked in response by the same MANPADS, and with a homing missile immediately after launch, you can leave, cling to the ground, hide behind the terrain, it’s obvious
                  2. Sergey53
                    Sergey53 18 December 2017 21: 00
                    0
                    Quote: Muvka
                    when the Mi-28s start up their tanks, do they freeze in place?

                    Yes, when the ATGM launch is in progress, the helicopter freezes to illuminate the target. And the rollers when the helicopter fires from a cannon or Nurses are at speed.
                    1. not main
                      not main 18 December 2017 23: 04
                      +1
                      Quote: Sergey53
                      Quote: Muvka
                      when the Mi-28s start up their tanks, do they freeze in place?

                      Yes, when the ATGM launch is in progress, the helicopter freezes to illuminate the target. And the rollers when the helicopter fires from a cannon or Nurses are at speed.

                      Well this is a masterpiece! Of course, it’s possible to launch ATGMs from hovering. But the main mode is a GP with cruising speed, by the way, when launching the Sturm and Attack, the helicopter has the ability to maneuver! Yes, and the phalanx was launched from the GP.
      2. _Jack_
        _Jack_ 18 December 2017 11: 58
        +2
        Have you seen a video from Syria using Barmalean rockets? It hangs motionless, and sometimes an operator smears on a motionless machine, in general, trouble is in accuracy, shot-and-forget guns were needed yesterday, but they still aren’t here, we are seriously behind
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 18 December 2017 12: 14
          +3
          Quote: _Jack_
          Have you seen a video from Syria using Barmalean rockets? It hangs motionless, and sometimes an operator smears on a motionless machine, in general, trouble is in accuracy, shot-and-forget guns were needed yesterday, but they still aren’t here, we are seriously behind

          Please provide a link to such a video. I have never seen. Seriously, throw at least one. I am very interested.
          1. _Jack_
            _Jack_ 18 December 2017 14: 24
            +2
            frankly, look for laziness, a hundred times already sucked, including on this forum. Here is the first one you get from YouTube.

            Take a closer look - 2 trucks stand motionless. The first rocket - whether it hit, or it exploded in front of the car, after which the car drives off to the side, the driver runs out of it and runs away, the car does not burn, it seems that it is minimally damaged or not damaged. The second rocket - it is absolutely clear that the rocket hits the ground in front of the machine. This is FIXED TRUCKS !!! The third missile seemed to hit the moving target, but again, the result of the hit is not visible, the video ends.
            At the same time, you need to keep in mind that no one will post outright blunders to the network, i.e. You should be proud of this video.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 18 December 2017 14: 34
              +1
              But nothing that the helicopter flies at a speed of 190-240km \ h? You do not see this?
              1. _Jack_
                _Jack_ 18 December 2017 14: 36
                +1
                All the time, the gunner repeats to the pilot "gently pedal," will he also carefully pedal away from the return fire of the air defense? and what is the result of the attack? scared the barmaley, they all fled, then calmly returned to their trucks and drove on.
                Amerikos from Apache would launch three homing missiles (which would hit exactly on target) and would fall down without waiting for the result, while ours would hang "carefully pedaling", waiting for an answer
                1. Muvka
                  Muvka 18 December 2017 14: 56
                  +1
                  AND? But he does not tell him: stand still. It is so? And the speed does not slow down.
                  1. _Jack_
                    _Jack_ 18 December 2017 14: 58
                    +3
                    And?

                    The conversation was about the fact that we do not have homing ATGs, because of this low attack efficiency and a very high risk for the helicopter crew
    2. LSA57
      LSA57 18 December 2017 11: 43
      +2
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Until we create a NEW anti-tank missile, we will be spinning in place!

      Yes, they spread the video like the Barmalean tanks in Syria very well multiplied by zero missiles. so that time and hurt while there
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer 18 December 2017 11: 51
        +1
        These are 70-80 rockets. Most likely an Attack. It is guided by a laser beam. If the Barmelians had the same Curtain, then our rockets would be useless
      2. just exp
        just exp 18 December 2017 11: 57
        +2
        it is in Syria, and if you have to with NATO? then what?
        for ATGMs seriously lagging behind. and even Hermes-A will not improve the situation much.
        although there will be (again the word "will") and the ICG seeker.
        and we also need the ARS GOS like a Hellfire.
        1. Magic archer
          Magic archer 18 December 2017 11: 59
          +2
          This is what I’m trying to prove to Muvke! But apparently it’s useless.
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 18 December 2017 12: 07
            +3
            We will fight with NATO with other weapons. I'm sorry that you just can't understand it. Yars, Clubs, Liners, Blue, Topol-M, Voivode, Sarmatians, Frontiers, Gauges with YaBCh, X-102. With these weapons we will be at war with NATO. Because we do not have so much conventional weapons to compete with all NATO countries.
            1. just exp
              just exp 19 December 2017 00: 15
              +1
              the use of nuclear weapons does not mean that there will be no ordinary land war. in the USSR it was not without reason that they were preparing to fight in the territories subjected to nuclear bombing.
        2. Muvka
          Muvka 18 December 2017 12: 03
          +1
          If we fight against NATO, the Iskander will destroy the patriots and the helicopters will be able to calmly shoot leopards and abrams with old birds at a great distance. What is the problem then? And there is Yars.
          1. Magic archer
            Magic archer 18 December 2017 12: 13
            +1
            I took popcorn and look forward to continuing !!!))) For a long time I did not discuss with such a sofa iksperd)))) what syllable !!! What strategy !!! fool Yars, Iskander, Poplars! In short, immediately a nuclear war and all krants!)))
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 18 December 2017 12: 17
              +4
              Naturally. We will fight with NATO only nuclear weapons. Because otherwise we can’t pull it out in any way.
              1. just exp
                just exp 19 December 2017 00: 16
                0
                are you ill? stop talking nonsense.
                otherwise one already took Grozny with one landing regiment.
          2. Hagalaz
            Hagalaz 18 December 2017 12: 16
            +2
            I take a neutral position in your dispute, but here you are in the last comment all right on the shelves laid out. Very beautiful. So it is assumed of course, but how it will actually turn out, only practice shows. Do not lean on favorable expectations.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 18 December 2017 12: 19
              +3
              Keep in mind that our helicopters are equipped with electronic warfare systems. Which at least seriously increases their survivability. About Syria is not necessary. All downed helicopters were shot down using laser beam guidance. Patriot can't do that, right?
              1. Hagalaz
                Hagalaz 18 December 2017 12: 36
                +1
                Quote: Muvka
                Keep in mind that our helicopters are equipped with electronic warfare systems. Which at least seriously increases their survivability. About Syria is not necessary. All downed helicopters were shot down using laser beam guidance. Patriot can't do that, right?

                I do not argue with you. In something I agree, in something not. I will answer with general phrases. Yes, we have something to answer. But talk about total superiority is not necessary. Something at our height, in something we concede. And the opportunity to shoot, talking about helicopters, and forget, it would not hurt us ....
                1. Muvka
                  Muvka 18 December 2017 12: 40
                  +2
                  Efficiency shot-forgot is far from 100%. But the cost will be felt immediately.
              2. just exp
                just exp 19 December 2017 00: 17
                +1
                and your electronic warfare on helicopters how to remove dust and fumes from the battlefield, to neutralize smoke screens?
                or do you have some kind of special physics in which the laser beam passes through dust, smoke and fumes?
        3. Alexander War
          Alexander War 18 December 2017 12: 21
          +3
          And you probably do not know about air defense? Tor-M2U and Shell-C2
          1. just exp
            just exp 19 December 2017 00: 20
            0
            have you heard anything about JAGM?
  3. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 18 December 2017 11: 37
    +6
    They’re doing everything right, the Mi-28 NM is much higher in functionality, the combat experience in Syria is taken into account, the wishes of the pilots are taken into account, the technologies also do not stand still, so we are waiting for new birds in the series!
  4. Nikolay R-PM
    Nikolay R-PM 18 December 2017 12: 14
    +4
    In my opinion (possibly erroneous), the Mi-28 family is not an anti-tank vehicle, but a direct support vehicle for the advancing forces. If we take the characteristics of a petro attack, then we can note a large nomenclature of warheads, as well as a large weight of explosive in a petro designed to defeat stationary fortifications.
    I don’t have exact data, but I suppose that radars with 360-degree visibility will give significantly greater maneuver freedom than the old radar located in front of the operator’s cabin.
    the assault complex with an attack missile has long been mass-produced, tested, the missile has a large nomenclature for combat units. More recently, by the way, the ka52 switched to its “service” whirlwind before flying with an assault.
    in general, mi28 repeats the history of its predecessor - 24-ka became what it was conceived only on the P-box / In-box.
    The issue of Breo capabilities, I believe, should be considered taking into account the tasks that the customer poses before the equipment, tactics of application and interaction with other types of weapons. It is these factors that shape the look of the car. As you know, there are no the best helicopters, planes, tanks in the world, but there are good ones that meet the requirements of the customer. Let's hope that the long tuning process will make the 28th a good helicopter.
  5. camo ridges
    camo ridges 18 December 2017 12: 27
    +2
    The machine has become cool - what does running in mean
    in combat conditions! Surely our helicopters
    can be considered the most combat-ready in the world.
  6. NEXUS
    NEXUS 18 December 2017 12: 47
    +3
    It is planned to install a helmet-mounted target designation and guidance system on the Mi-28NM.

    What about night vision goggles? The pilots themselves complained about their poor quality, inconvenience, and so on ...
  7. timothy61
    timothy61 18 December 2017 13: 06
    +1
    Mi-28 is inferior to the characteristics of the Ka-52, but it is pulled by the ears.
    1. Sands Careers General
      Sands Careers General 20 December 2017 01: 14
      +4
      Where are Mil's helicopters inferior to Kamov's?
  8. Conrad
    Conrad 18 December 2017 18: 24
    +1
    First of all, the functionality of the combat vehicle has been improved by changing the ergonomics of the cockpit and installing a backup helicopter control system in the cockpit of the operator.

    Bravo!!! After 30 years from the creation of the concept, “double control” returned to the “24 ki” scheme. It seems that each new generation of designers goes the same way. From the idea of ​​the pilot, “Gromozeki” both pilots, and discovers targets, and operates with weapons, and if he is also the unit commander, he also manages the “squadron unit” in battle (Ka-50). And if the wound is guaranteed "honorable" death with the operator, if any (Mi-28). And here is a return to the tried and tested dual-control scheme, so that the weapons operator would not be a hostage.