Military Review

Deliveries of the upgraded Night Hunter to the troops will begin in a year

47
The first deliveries to the troops of the modernized Night Hunters Mi-28 NM will begin at the end of next year, the holding company Helicopters of Russia informs.


Currently, the company is preparing for the production of a modernized Mi-28NM helicopter, designed to make a significant contribution to improving the combat capabilities of army units aviation. He will begin to enter the troops at the end of 2018.
- said TASS managing director of the Rostov-owned enterprise "Rostvertol" included in the holding Peter Motrenko.

Deliveries of the upgraded Night Hunter to the troops will begin in a year


Mi-28HM - a modernized version of the Mi-28H, which is in service with both the Russian army and the armed forces of foreign countries.

According to the developers, the modernized “Hunter” is a fundamentally new machine with improved tactical, technical, flight and combat characteristics. The new helicopter received a radar of a circular review and a new control system. For the upgraded "Night Hunter", improved rotor blades are created - they will increase the cruising speed of the vehicle by 13 percent, and the maximum - by 10. The upgraded Mi-28H can accelerate to 340 kilometers per hour.

In addition, a more sophisticated navigation equipment is installed on the new helicopter. which is responsible for determining speed, drift angle and height. This complex allows you to automatically maintain the course even if all the navigation systems of the Hunter fail.
Photos used:
Sergey Wieniawski / RIA News
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Logall
    Logall 5 December 2017 18: 00
    13
    Deliveries in a year, And when will the defects be eliminated? Electronics, wiring, glasses, etc. etc....
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 5 December 2017 18: 14
      +4
      As they say, if in the process of exploitation shortcomings are identified, they will think about their elimination. So about one engineer from the factory told me about! sad
      1. Logall
        Logall 5 December 2017 18: 21
        +9
        God forbid, Vitalievich, God forbid that they will think. It turns out that they have adopted with jambs ...
        I left you a little info about the warehouses there ...
        1. Herculesic
          Herculesic 5 December 2017 18: 42
          +2
          Logall - Alexander! hi I’ll be there so to speak “for a week,” there is someone to talk with on this topic, otherwise I heard wonderful things, I want to clarify the info! By the results I will unsubscribe necessarily! !! hi
    2. In100gram
      In100gram 5 December 2017 18: 30
      +1
      Quote: Logall
      And when will the flaws be eliminated? Electronics, wiring, glasses, etc. etc.

      It is also written in the article
      According to the developers, the modernized Hunter is a fundamentally new machine with improved tactical, technical, flight and combat characteristics. The new helicopter received an all-round radar and a new control system.

      Specifications have not yet been disclosed, the composition of the equipment, too. To draw conclusions early
      1. Logall
        Logall 5 December 2017 18: 37
        10
        During the week? Nonsense! Especially about glasses - '' pilot's death '' not a word! And about other, recently identified, imperfections ...
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 5 December 2017 18: 47
          +1
          In fact, the modification of NM has been under development for several years ...
        2. abc_alex
          abc_alex 6 December 2017 16: 30
          +1
          But let's figure it out.
          The pilot's points to the helicopter have nothing to do. This is an "additional equipment". The Mi-28 is firing and aiming at its own multi-channel sight, which has no problems with illumination, even when launching missiles. The pilot needs glasses only for take-off and landing at night. And they are supplied by a supplier independent from KB Mil and Rosvertol. Therefore, the "point problem" has nothing to do with the helicopter modernization program.
    3. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 5 December 2017 19: 08
      +4
      Quote: Logall
      Deliveries in a year, And when will the defects be eliminated? Electronics, wiring, glasses, etc. etc....

      not quite in the subject, but came across such news !!! repeat repeat

      The Su-57 fighter (or rather its prototypes), which was executed under the PAK FA (Advanced Aviation Complex of Frontline Aviation) program, was tested until recently with the so-called. "Engine of the first stage", or AL-41F1. In a very broad sense, it represents a further development of the concept of the Soviet AL-31F engine, which is installed on the Su-27 fighter. For all its advantages, the AL-41F1 does not meet the requirements for the fifth generation. That is why such attention is focused on the “Product 30”.

      Now, several authoritative sources have stated at once that the first flight of the Su-57 with a new engine has finally taken place. There is no official information on this subject. According to reports, the plane took off in the morning of December 5th. New engines are installed on the prototype T-50-2 (tail number 052). This is the second flight prototype made as part of the PAK FA program. He first flew up to the sky on March 3, 2011.

      http://in24.org/technology/29853?utm_source=warfi
      les.ru
    4. Juborg
      Juborg 5 December 2017 19: 13
      +6
      In my opinion about electronics and glasses "death to the pilot", this is nonsense dreamed of by the former boss, who suddenly saw that it was all shit.

      Yes, the photo of the new Mi-28NM is not what we were presented in the article. Mickey Mouse's nose is gone.
      1. seregatara1969
        seregatara1969 5 December 2017 22: 05
        +1
        sensors directly on the gun added
        1. vadimtt
          vadimtt 6 December 2017 09: 52
          0
          Something like a fake photo, these sensors on a movable turret do not make sense from the word at all. In addition, the accuracy of the gun with such a hitch is in doubt. Well, the sailing of this economy in some modes can eat all the power of the gun drives smile
          1. abc_alex
            abc_alex 6 December 2017 16: 32
            +1
            These are the sensors installed for the test period on the test machine :) They need to be taken out as far as possible outside the case. That stuck to the gun :)
            1. vadimtt
              vadimtt 6 December 2017 16: 38
              0
              Ah, well, if only so hi
      2. Lycan
        Lycan 5 December 2017 23: 27
        0
        Quote: juborg
        In my opinion about electronics and glasses "death to the pilot", this is nonsense dreamed about by the former boss

        Who knows - maybe the truth: they got some miscalculations so much that these "splinters" began to appear in many regiments, and, as a result, reviews turned into statistics, reducing the speed or effectiveness of the pilot. Quite possibly.
      3. Sonet
        Sonet 6 December 2017 19: 39
        0
        And in this photo, the nose is. Although it is also the Mi-24 NM. Photo from the Military Acceptance, I hope the nose is still left.
        1. Juborg
          Juborg 6 December 2017 20: 53
          +1
          This is not NM, UB from the Military Acceptance.
    5. NEXUS
      NEXUS 5 December 2017 21: 13
      +4
      Quote: Logall
      Deliveries in a year, And when will the defects be eliminated? Electronics, wiring, glasses, etc. etc....

      In essence, the Hunter in Syria passed military tests, as well as other cars that visited there. Based on the results of these tests, the identified shortcomings and shortcomings will be corrected. Normal work to improve shock systems and arsenal.
      The only question that worries me is glasses. I never liked them. Maybe she sort of took it away like in helmets with a screen? ... I don’t know ... otherwise the pilot with these glasses looks kindly put it mildly, silly.
      1. newcomer
        newcomer 5 December 2017 21: 33
        +3
        not understandable applications are made by our “husbands“. from this, apparently dissimilar little articles like all Russian electronics / avionics are dancing. Yes, of course, there should have been objective problems identified in combat conditions and, most importantly, active work is underway on the mistakes (I mean not only MI28). and how much “I was picking on the internet, I didn’t find anything similar to Bondarev’s words. in my opinion he went too far.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 5 December 2017 21: 36
          +4
          Quote: newbie
          in my opinion he went too far.

          It’s better to bend so that the output is even better ...
          Quote: Piramidon
          Have you tried flying with these glasses?

          I say, based on the complaints of our helicopter pilots. A couple of days ago there was an article about this.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 5 December 2017 21: 43
              +3
              Quote: newbie
              I understand your train of thought, but! this had to be done not on camera, but in the company of pilots and manufacturers. I have already said that we risk collapsing 28x exports. opinions have already sounded today, why do they buy our cars, since such a thing? that's what i mean.

              I don’t think that Bondarev’s words will somehow influence the expert opinion of potential buyers, as these experts know and understand weapons better than many military men from books and video games.
              1. newcomer
                newcomer 5 December 2017 21: 47
                +3
                yes, I agree. but there are also slippery moments (for example, like the Indians) who will reflect on the statement of the former commander of the Air Force.
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS 5 December 2017 21: 51
                  +3
                  Quote: newbie
                  yes, I agree. but there are also slippery moments (for example, like the Indians) who will reflect on the statement of the former commander of the Air Force.

                  They do not think, but pretend in order to bargain for a price that is more favorable to themselves. Remember the story of the SU-30, the MIG-29 ... they shouted that our defective dryers, however, they were silently buying and will buy.
                  1. newcomer
                    newcomer 5 December 2017 21: 57
                    +2
                    I agree. and thus “carry around the table” our contracts. and the statements of Bondarev contribute to this and do not honor him, nor our army aviation. in general, another spot on the reputation of our mashiks (not deservedly), which our helicopter pilots will have to wash over the battlefield.
          2. newcomer
            newcomer 5 December 2017 21: 41
            +3
            I understand your train of thought, but! this had to be done not on camera, but in the company of pilots and manufacturers. I have already said that we risk collapsing 28x exports. opinions have already sounded today, why do they buy our cars, since such a thing? that's what i mean.
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 5 December 2017 21: 33
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        The only question that worries me is glasses. I never liked them

        Have you already flown with these glasses and didn’t like it?
    6. max702
      max702 5 December 2017 22: 04
      +2
      According to the mind, it would be necessary to leave the army one KA-52 machine (sharply increasing production capacity), and the Mi-28 exclusively for export .. this is both economy (one model, not two) and our army will get the best in terms of character ... Milevtsev didn’t leave a stone flower.
      rs: And so that no one broadcasts there, but you need to return to the KA-50 at a new level .. If in the 80s it was recognized as possible and the DB confirmed it, then today it is possible all the more .. The benefit on the scale of our country's armed forces will be colossal ..
      1. newcomer
        newcomer 5 December 2017 22: 16
        +1
        I don’t think so. but sorry. because KA50 was recognized as “a machine several decades ahead of the time.” but what do we do with such machines? _ safely forget about them. and they start to bribe government money for sketches of “fundamentally new cars,” after several years of “drawing and sketching lessons,” they shout about a lack of money.
        1. 11 black
          11 black 5 December 2017 22: 59
          +1
          Quote: newbie
          I don’t think so. but sorry. because KA50 was recognized as “a machine several decades ahead of the time.” but what do we do with such machines? _ safely forget about them. and they start to bribe government money for sketches of “fundamentally new cars,” after several years of “drawing and sketching lessons,” they shout about a lack of money.

          Ka-50 showed the fundamental impossibility of making a combat helicopter with one pilot. The pilots simply could not stand the simultaneous work for themselves, and for the shooter, and for the ATGM operator.
          Even the Americans, with their electronics and automation, cannot refuse the co-pilot.
          The result was Ka-52. The same Ka-50, but modified and double.
          1. newcomer
            newcomer 5 December 2017 23: 10
            +1
            no, colleague. KA52 is not a “Shark." and the reasons for rejecting them are completely different.
        2. abc_alex
          abc_alex 6 December 2017 17: 04
          0
          The Ka-50 was so powerfully “ahead of the time” that it lagged behind the Mi-28 all the time during comparative tests and there was a moment when due to the avionics flaws, the option of giving it a reconnaissance helicopter-target was seriously considered. :) In addition, Kamovtsi made the wrong bet in choosing a missile system. The Whirlwind was put into production for too long, and while the Mi-28 was already flying with the Sturm and the Igla, the Ka-52 was still armed with non-serial missiles.
          1. max702
            max702 11 December 2017 00: 09
            0
            Quote: abc_alex

            0
            abc_alex December 6, 2017 17:04 p.m. ↑
            The Ka-50 was so powerfully “ahead of the time” that it lagged behind the Mi-28 all the time during comparative tests and there was a moment when due to the avionics flaws, the option of giving it a reconnaissance helicopter-target was seriously considered. :) In addition, Kamovtsi made the wrong bet in choosing a missile system. The Whirlwind was put into production for too long, and while the Mi-28 was already flying with the Sturm and the Igla, the Ka-52 was still armed not with a series

            Do not write nonsense .. Everything was just the opposite and in all respects ..
            1. abc_alex
              abc_alex 12 December 2017 12: 57
              0
              Prove it.
  2. Magic archer
    Magic archer 5 December 2017 18: 08
    0
    We must do it like the Chinese. Or steal and then make our own analogues or hire foreign specialists. We ourselves can’t yet
    1. assa67
      assa67 5 December 2017 18: 14
      +5
      but what, excuse me, is the "alligator", that is, the "hunter" is bad? ... has been recommending himself perfectly for many years ... or do you know the perfect car? ... enlighten hi
    2. Herculesic
      Herculesic 5 December 2017 18: 16
      +2
      Cook with whom? It was a good idea, but with its implementation a kind of megakosak came out!
  3. ImPerts
    ImPerts 5 December 2017 18: 09
    +2
    It's good that they improved the performance characteristics.
    When will the normal night vision devices ???
  4. assa67
    assa67 5 December 2017 18: 10
    +4
    "radar, a new control system", etc .... eliminate .... and again it is not said how much is ordered MO ... or is it a military secret?
  5. Herculesic
    Herculesic 5 December 2017 18: 12
    +4
    And the rear screw gearbox will remain the same unreliable, overly complex, and with a low resource?
  6. Falcond
    Falcond 5 December 2017 19: 02
    0
    And in the picture so far just an H-modification
  7. Romanenko
    Romanenko 5 December 2017 20: 24
    +1
    Mi-28 is probably the most controversial machine KB.
    So many birthmarks like he probably almost no car has.
    Its technical history is somewhat reminiscent of the anabasis of the Tu-22 - Tu-22M, etc. right up to the Tu-22 M3, the thorny path of turning metal into an airplane.
    Interestingly, the Mi-28NM will finally rise to the level of a reliable machine?
    Perhaps currently the F-35 is preparing to intercept this "relay stick" and headed along the same route.
  8. da Vinci
    da Vinci 5 December 2017 23: 56
    0
    Somewhere for 30 years they have been modernizing (this is how they improve the aircraft in 1940 in 1970). Even the Su27 and Su 35 are almost different cars, but here? belay
  9. arnulla
    arnulla 6 December 2017 00: 00
    0
    Come on, really even a circular radar appeared))) how many years have been waiting for him ...
  10. Sars
    Sars 6 December 2017 04: 55
    0
    The fact that Miles Corporation in Moscow has a “hairy paw” that promotes non-competitive equipment has been rumored for a long time. A question for filling: there is no control and supervision over officials in uniform?
  11. Whatabout
    Whatabout 6 December 2017 10: 10
    +1
    Quote: vadimtt
    Something like a fake photo, these sensors on a movable turret do not make sense from the word at all. In addition, the accuracy of the gun with such a hitch is in doubt. Well, the sailing of this economy in some modes can eat all the power of the gun drives smile

    I saw the work of this gun on the stand at the factory ... believe me, the drive forces there are enough for anything.
  12. Sergey53
    Sergey53 6 December 2017 15: 59
    0
    First put! And there it will be seen.
  13. Nikolay R-PM
    Nikolay R-PM 7 December 2017 10: 04
    0
    As far as I know, OVN-1 Skosok are included in the Mi-28N and Ka-52 configuration. And the criticism from the former commander-in-chief touched only the 28th one-sidedly, as if the same PNV on different turntables works differently with cage light sources. Where is the objectivity?