Military Review

In the arsenal of the Su-34 appear new weapons

36
Flight tests of a Su-34 front-line bomber equipped with new aviation weapons of destruction (TSA) and advanced avionics, will be completed next year, reports Interfax-AVN message source in the aviation industry.




From 2020 onwards, these vehicles will begin to enter into service with the Russian Aerospace Forces,
said the source.

At the same time, he noted that "all the improvements of the aircraft on its weapons and airborne avionics will be introduced during the ongoing mass production of the aircraft."

The combat potential of the bombers will be increased, including through long-range aircraft missiles, as well as improved avionics.

As for the possibility of upgrading the previously released serial Su-34 with the introduction of the results of the R & D conducted in them, this will depend on the decision of the customer - the Russian Spacecraft System,
explained the source.

According to him, in the course of the modernization, “special equipment will also be improved, in particular, an airborne defense complex (CCD) and EW systems with the possibility of group protection.”

The Su-34 front bomber, developed by the Sukhoi Design Bureau and mass-produced by the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant (part of the Sukhoi company), is designed to hit both ground and water objects of the enemy, it can hit moving targets of even small size. Also, the aircraft has the ability to destroy air targets at any time of the day or night under any meteorological conditions.

Flight range of the Su-34 - up to 4 000 km, maximum speed - up to 1 900 km / h, combat load - up to 8 tons. The machine is equipped with the latest weapons control system and a system of in-flight refueling.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Illegal-M
    Illegal-M 1 December 2017 17: 23 New
    +3
    From 2020 onwards, these vehicles will begin to enter into service with the Russian Aerospace Forces,

    I think a lot earlier .. If you judge by the situation in the world. Otherwise, the 41st again. soldier
    1. 210ox
      210ox 1 December 2017 17: 27 New
      10
      The Syrian experience is a great thing. About "much earlier" .. I doubt it. Su57 is an example ..
      Quote: Illegal-M
      From 2020 onwards, these vehicles will begin to enter into service with the Russian Aerospace Forces,

      I think a lot earlier .. If you judge by the situation in the world. Otherwise, the 41st again. soldier
      1. Anarchist
        Anarchist 1 December 2017 17: 40 New
        14
        Su-57 is a great disappointment! Expecting him ... How much longer is there to wait?
        Quote: 210ox
        The Syrian experience is a great thing. About "much earlier" .. I doubt it. Su57 is an example ..
        Quote: Illegal-M
        From 2020 onwards, these vehicles will begin to enter into service with the Russian Aerospace Forces,

        I think a lot earlier .. If you judge by the situation in the world. Otherwise, the 41st again. soldier
        1. 210ox
          210ox 1 December 2017 17: 49 New
          +7
          In the days of the USSR, aircraft were "put on the wing" and sent to the troops twice as fast. The truth is that the industrial potential is not comparable. But Alexander does not need to be disappointed. The machine will be created and will serve.
          Quote: Anarchist
          Su-57 is a great disappointment! Expecting him ... How much longer is there to wait?
          Quote: 210ox
          The Syrian experience is a great thing. About "much earlier" .. I doubt it. Su57 is an example ..
          Quote: Illegal-M
          From 2020 onwards, these vehicles will begin to enter into service with the Russian Aerospace Forces,

          I think a lot earlier .. If you judge by the situation in the world. Otherwise, the 41st again. soldier
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 1 December 2017 18: 00 New
            14
            Quote: 210ox
            In the days of the USSR, aircraft were "put on the wing" and sent to the troops twice as fast. The truth is that the industrial potential is not comparable. But Alexander does not need to be disappointed. The machine will be created and will serve.

            Are you serious now?
            Su-27:
            in early 1971, an official decision was made to begin work on the T-10 product
            First flight May 20, 1977
            Getting Started 1985 year.
            Seriously, aren't you ashamed? 8 years have passed from the first flight to the start of operation. Su-57 took off in 2010.
            1. Anarchist
              Anarchist 1 December 2017 18: 06 New
              13
              The air rose is just a prototype Pak fa! Which subsequently suffered many changes! That was far from su-57 ...
              And so far the su-57 has not gone into production! It’s not even clear with the new engine he is either waiting for him now ...
              PAK FA - Advanced Frontline Aviation Complex. ... Such a list was formed already in the 80s and work on the creation of the 5th generation began simultaneously in the USA and the USSR back in the 81st year.
            2. 210ox
              210ox 1 December 2017 18: 11 New
              +3
              I’m not ashamed. Because you play with dates. Su 27 took to the skies in 1982 and it was already serial. And there are only promises about the serial Su57.
              Quote: Muvka
              Quote: 210ox
              In the days of the USSR, aircraft were "put on the wing" and sent to the troops twice as fast. The truth is that the industrial potential is not comparable. But Alexander does not need to be disappointed. The machine will be created and will serve.

              Are you serious now?
              Su-27:
              in early 1971, an official decision was made to begin work on the T-10 product
              First flight May 20, 1977
              Getting Started 1985 year.
              Seriously, aren't you ashamed? 8 years have passed from the first flight to the start of operation. Su-57 took off in 2010.
              1. Muvka
                Muvka 1 December 2017 18: 16 New
                +4
                Then you play dates too. Su-57 with the final electronics rose only this year. So we are waiting after 3 years of serial. Or do you think that the T-50-1 and T-50-11 differ less than the T-10-1 and T-10S-1?
                1. 210ox
                  210ox 1 December 2017 18: 24 New
                  +4
                  But I didn’t announce the dates on Su57 ... I just see that through the efforts or most likely the thoughtless language of our leaders, this project turned into the skin of an unkilled bear. By the way, according to T10. During the tests, the TTX mismatch was revealed. remodel ... If you suddenly decide to remake the 57th ... It's easier to shoot yourself.
                  Quote: Muvka
                  Then you play dates too. Su-57 with the final electronics rose only this year. So we are waiting after 3 years of serial. Or do you think that the T-50-1 and T-50-11 differ less than the T-10-1 and T-10S-1?
                  1. Anarchist
                    Anarchist 1 December 2017 18: 31 New
                    12
                    Dim, he probably did not pay attention to what I wrote! What development began at 81! Total 36 years ... And he is not in the series!
                    1. Muvka
                      Muvka 1 December 2017 18: 37 New
                      +3
                      Those. Is it a development of the USSR? Then what are the claims against Russia?
                      1. Anarchist
                        Anarchist 1 December 2017 18: 44 New
                        12
                        Duc still can not finish!
                  2. Muvka
                    Muvka 1 December 2017 18: 32 New
                    +4
                    Are you sure that the Su-57 did not alter? Everything has changed in it, from a glider to electronics. But the bottom line is that the Su-27 was developed longer. But you say that in the USSR they put on the wing 2 times faster. These are your words.
                    1. 210ox
                      210ox 1 December 2017 18: 49 New
                      +2
                      That the glider did not redo it for sure. I do not know about other components
                      But the T10 glider was redone. I just want to convey a simple truth. Well, we can’t reach the pace of construction and commissioning of new equipment. And this applies not only to aviation. There are systemic problems. I’ve broken up industries, personnel, theft, social system, impotence of the leadership. This list is long. And they still feed us promises. The car will go to the troops — we will compare. And now there’s nothing to compare.
                      Quote: Muvka
                      Are you sure that the Su-57 did not alter? Everything has changed in it, from a glider to electronics. But the bottom line is that the Su-27 was developed longer. But you say that in the USSR they put on the wing 2 times faster. These are your words.
                      1. Muvka
                        Muvka 1 December 2017 18: 57 New
                        0
                        Redid since the glider will go to release from the T-50-9. And not from the T-50-1.
                        Wrong. From T-50-11. Electronics from the nine. Here is the news from the same site: https://topwar.ru/122036-prototip-t-50-11-s-plane
                        rom-su-57-sovershil-pervyy-polet.html
                        And here is a clipping:
                        The reason is that the Su-57 production aircraft will have exactly the same glider as the T-50-11. The glider itself has undergone significant changes since the creation of the first prototype.. The Su-57 onboard equipment will be the same as that of the prototype T-50-9.
                      2. voyaka uh
                        voyaka uh 1 December 2017 21: 43 New
                        +4
                        "That the glider did not redo it for sure." ////

                        Remade. The internal weapons compartment weakens the structure.
                        Glider reinforced.
            3. Zaurbek
              Zaurbek 1 December 2017 19: 27 New
              +4
              And the complexity from generation to generation is growing ... in 4m and 5m electronics are already stuffed in everything ... and this is a separate industry.
            4. sivuch
              sivuch 2 December 2017 12: 34 New
              +1
              Here are just the first series of the Su-27 and the pilots and even the factory workers did not call firewood otherwise.
        2. Warrior-80
          Warrior-80 1 December 2017 23: 25 New
          +3
          And what is your disappointment in the fact that we did not accept it with an outdated engine or weapons that do not meet the time, I think the right decision is to extend the debugging but really release the 5th generation, unlike the United States
    2. okko077
      okko077 1 December 2017 18: 18 New
      +2
      Otherwise 41st again
      Do not worry, our pi_ndo comrade, will not be because of nuclear weapons ...
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 1 December 2017 18: 45 New
      +7
      Quote: Illegal-M
      I think a lot earlier .. If you judge by the situation in the world. Otherwise, the 41st again.

      I agree with you ... I think the implementation of many projects will now be accelerated. And above all, with regards to suppliers and financing.
      Quote: 210ox
      About "much earlier" .. I doubt it. Su57 is an example ..

      Su-57 doesn’t burn us yet ... SU-35 and SU-30 are going to the VKS, and in the coming years these very machines will be the main heavy IFIs in our country. The 57th hurry should not be allowed into the series until the military tests have passed, so as not to walk on the same rake as the F-35 mattresses.
  2. pvv113
    pvv113 1 December 2017 17: 30 New
    +8
    airborne defense complex

    Actually, the Airborne Defense Complex (BKO) will be correct.
    And BWC is a button to quickly turn off the autopilot. On the helm - right
    1. 210ox
      210ox 1 December 2017 17: 51 New
      +1
      Cabin Tu22 M2?
      Quote: pvv113
      airborne defense complex

      Actually, the Airborne Defense Complex (BKO) will be correct.
      And BWC is a button to quickly turn off the autopilot. On the helm - right
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 1 December 2017 18: 17 New
        +5
        This is the seat of the commander of the Tu-22M3. Did not serve on deuces, but the cabin is similar
  3. Magic archer
    Magic archer 1 December 2017 17: 33 New
    +1
    Well, at least they voiced the nomenclature of new means of destruction! And so ... You can say about every aircraft in service with the VKS
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 1 December 2017 18: 27 New
      0
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Well, at least they announced the nomenclature of new means of defeat!

      This is you at the wrong place! You need Wikipedia, everyone knows there!
  4. weksha50
    weksha50 1 December 2017 17: 40 New
    +1
    "" All aircraft improvements in its armament and avionics will be implemented during the ongoing mass production of the aircraft"...

    What is there Bondarev about the failed REO said ... True, he spoke out in the Mi-28N alres ...
    Everything is now practiced in Syria and brought up ... And it’s better and more practical than at the training ground ...
    1. Vladimir61
      Vladimir61 1 December 2017 20: 34 New
      +2
      He said what the pilots complained about - night vision goggles!
  5. Going
    Going 1 December 2017 17: 52 New
    +7
    At the same time, he noted that "all the improvements of the aircraft on its weapons and airborne avionics will be introduced during the ongoing mass production of the aircraft."


    It has always been like this, all the new products were immediately introduced.
  6. Chertt
    Chertt 1 December 2017 17: 54 New
    +1
    More than a hundred Su-34s are already in service with the Russian Aerospace Forces; now they are all modernized. Damn this gift to our so-so-slimming defense budget
    1. IL-18
      IL-18 1 December 2017 21: 41 New
      +1
      And now what not to redo? And in fact, they fly! While they will make the current changes, they think of something else. Finish again!
  7. Veteran
    Veteran 1 December 2017 17: 55 New
    +6
    As of October 2017, more than one hundred SU-34s have already been produced.
  8. 210ox
    210ox 1 December 2017 19: 26 New
    0
    Muvka,
    What do you want to convince me of? In the current conditions, we are building aviation as fast as in the USSR? They did not convince .. So far, the timing of the introduction of new equipment is not comparable.
    1. Vladimir61
      Vladimir61 1 December 2017 20: 36 New
      +1
      You are right, but the comparable basic potential of the USSR and the Russian Federation are not comparable.
  9. Mestny
    Mestny 1 December 2017 21: 19 New
    +5
    Quote: 210ox
    If you suddenly decide to remake the 57th ... It's easier to shoot yourself.

    Calm!
    Alterations occur constantly and, in principle, continuously. This is a normal workflow.
    Firstly, in the development process, of course, not the shortest one, sometimes new ideas arise. And for the same reason - long development periods - upcoming conditions for the use of products periodically change. These partners are also inventing something there.
    What a clear case is forcing the authors to urgently change something, sometimes dramatically.
    Moreover. In the process of testing and development, it may suddenly become clear that this product in a particular test form is not needed. Does not meet the new challenges so to speak.
    And what’s most interesting is everywhere. Even (!) In the USA.
    Of course there are breakouts, good luck. But basically - like that.
    On each side of the confrontation.
  10. Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova 2 December 2017 11: 52 New
    +1
    Somehow interesting people are judging the timing of development and delivery to the troops. It’s the same as comparing the manufacture of a cart and a Formula 1 car. There are completely different requirements here — the use of new materials (composites), new layouts for placing weapons, armament itself, electronic warfare systems, new radars, software, etc., etc. Many things need to be solved from scratch. The tasks are much more complicated, and it is strange to think that the time to solve them will only be reduced. This is illogical.