Military Review

Russia is creating weapons to defeat satellites

91
Russian specialists are working to create weapons for the defeat of satellites, reported in one of the scientific institutions of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.


As Oleg Achasov, deputy head of the Federal Scientific Research Institute "46 Central Research Institute", noted, work in a number of areas will be completed as part of the 2018-2027 weapons program. In particular, he said that the Russian Federation is creating the Rudolph mobile anti-satellite attack system and the Tirada-2С mobile communications electronic defeat complex.

Russia is creating weapons to defeat satellites


It is planned to create or complete the creation of a stationary strategic missile system "Sarmat", PAK FA, a multifunctional Su-35S aircraft, a promising hypersonic operational missile, tanks and combat vehicles on promising combat platforms Armata, Kurganets, Boomerang, self-propelled guns Coalition-SV, anti-tank system Kornet, mobile multi-channel anti-aircraft missile system long-range air defense systems S-500, mobile anti-satellite missile system Rudolph, frigate project 22350, Project 885 multipurpose submarine, Project 23560 and 22160 patrol ships, Zircon high-precision hypersonic missiles, the ground and mobile electronic warfare complex for Tirada-2C and other communications satellites
- said Achasov on Thursday at a meeting of the defense committee of the Federation Council.

The work of military engineers will not be limited only to these projects, but the priority directions for the development of Russian armaments will be determined by an appropriate program even after preparing a justification for the "prospects for the development of the weapons system of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation."

According to the data on the website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, this Central Scientific Research Institute compiles an armament program and is engaged in substantiating "the prospects for the development of the armament system of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation", Interfax reports.
Photos used:
yandex.ru/images
91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Primoos
    Primoos 30 November 2017 16: 07 New
    +3
    How interesting, Rudolph! Why not Adolf? The imagination of our developers knows no bounds. Both in technology and in names.
    1. Going
      Going 30 November 2017 16: 11 New
      20
      I believe that we have the best names for our weapons.
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 30 November 2017 16: 20 New
        20
        Our inventors and designers are not deprived of imagination. An artillery bouquet alone is worth a lot laughing
        1. Tatar 174
          Tatar 174 30 November 2017 16: 24 New
          +3
          Quote: pvv113
          Our inventors and designers are not deprived of imagination. An artillery bouquet alone is worth a lot laughing

          Wow, about artillery, I used to shoot Cornflower once.
        2. Going
          Going 30 November 2017 16: 25 New
          11
          There is a bike in M.O. there is a man and when the weapon is still only in the layout, they let him down and ask what to call him and he gives an answer almost without thinking and no one can come up with a better one.
          1. faiver
            faiver 30 November 2017 16: 34 New
            +3
            and this man is immortal laughing
            1. Going
              Going 30 November 2017 16: 58 New
              +8
              The receiver is appointed, but with a sense of beauty and humor. hi
            2. Nikolaevich I
              Nikolaevich I 30 November 2017 17: 45 New
              +1
              Quote: faiver
              and this man is immortal

              Really MacLeod? belay
      2. faiver
        faiver 30 November 2017 16: 35 New
        +4
        it is necessary to call something cheburashka laughing
      3. venik
        venik 30 November 2017 20: 06 New
        0
        Quote: Going
        885 project

        ==========
        Especially - "Rudolph" !!!
    2. 210ox
      210ox 30 November 2017 16: 13 New
      +3
      Then already Atas ..
      Quote: Primoos
      How interesting, Rudolph! Why not Adolf? The imagination of our developers knows no bounds. Both in technology and in names.
      1. bald
        bald 30 November 2017 16: 41 New
        +2
        For lasers - we are the first and the developments are inferior to ours. “The hyperboloid of engineer Garin” is a fantastic novel by A. N. Tolstoy, completed by 1927.
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 30 November 2017 18: 58 New
          +3
          Vladimir, if you review the film, even Garin had to keep the beam on the object for some time. I am silent about Tesla.
      2. bald
        bald 30 November 2017 16: 50 New
        +1
        You know, we speak unusually from everyone - this is good. Well, it turns out I can’t always understand you (not everyone, just since 2014, maybe I'm mistaken, I read your reasoning and it's normal.)
        1. 210ox
          210ox 30 November 2017 18: 00 New
          +1
          Vladimir hi If you are talking about me, you have correctly noticed. I myself often understand a little .... winked
          Quote: bald
          You know, we speak unusually from everyone - this is good. Well, it turns out I can’t always understand you (not everyone, just since 2014, maybe I'm mistaken, I read your reasoning and it's normal.)
          1. dubovitskiy.1947
            dubovitskiy.1947 30 November 2017 18: 45 New
            0
            Quote: 210ox
            Vladimir hi If you are talking about me, you have correctly noticed. I myself often understand a little .... winked
            Quote: bald
            You know, we speak unusually from everyone - this is good. Well, it turns out I can’t always understand you (not everyone, just since 2014, maybe I'm mistaken, I read your reasoning and it's normal.)

            I'll mess with myself. Rarely, and then, bruised so together and went ....
          2. sabakina
            sabakina 30 November 2017 19: 02 New
            +2
            Dmitry, there wasn’t enough for you to still be afraid of yourself! What are we supposed to do then?
    3. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 30 November 2017 16: 30 New
      +2
      Quote: Primoos
      How interesting, Rudolph! Why not Adolf?

      And therefore, why the A-235 missile defense system (Nudol)! yes
      1. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 30 November 2017 16: 42 New
        +2
        Quote: SRC P-15
        But because, why, the A-235 missile defense system (Nudol)! We changed the first letter and added "F

        Well done! Get out! And what do you say when they appear, God forbid, "Roland", "Siegfried"? wink
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 30 November 2017 16: 50 New
          +8
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          And what do you say when they appear, God forbid, "Roland", "Siegfried"?

          "Roland" stands for: Russia Loves Americans A Little Fool. laughing
          Siegfried is harder, but if you think about it ... laughing
          1. Nikolaevich I
            Nikolaevich I 30 November 2017 17: 06 New
            +4
            Quote: SRC P-15
            "Roland" stands for: Russia Loves Americans A Little Fool.

            good drinks
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 30 November 2017 17: 10 New
              +3
              Quote: Nikolaevich I
              Quote: SRC P-15
              But because, why, the A-235 missile defense system (Nudol)! We changed the first letter and added "F

              Well done! Get out! And what do you say when they appear, God forbid, "Roland", "Siegfried"? wink


              You can already add:
              Obama, Trump, Merkel, McCain ...
              and this is the most put on combat duty

              I can imagine how Middle East buyers would like the Washington complex

      2. Yuyuka
        Yuyuka 30 November 2017 18: 54 New
        +2
        Quote: SRC P-15
        Quote: Primoos
        How interesting, Rudolph! Why not Adolf?

        And therefore, why the A-235 missile defense system (Nudol)! yes


        Adolf, Rudolph, Nudol ... Non-spoken names ... We need a more specific and paralyzing name! For example - "Trahatel" wassat
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 30 November 2017 19: 00 New
          +1
          [quote = Yuyuka] Adolf, Rudolph, Nudol ... Non-spoken names ... [/ quote]
          You are mistaken, Nudol is a river in the Moscow Region that flows into the Sestra River in my opinion. And the A-235 missile defense system (Nudol) is apparently named after this river. [Quote = Yuyuka]
          1. bk316
            bk316 30 November 2017 19: 13 New
            +2
            Nudol is a river in Moscow

            There is one, only in my opinion it doesn’t fall into the Sister but into Istra
          2. Yuyuka
            Yuyuka 30 November 2017 19: 15 New
            0
            [quote = СРЦ П-15] [quote = Yuyuka] Adolf, Rudolph, Nudol ... Non-spoken names ... [/ quote]
            You are mistaken, Nudol is a river in the Moscow Region that flows into the Sestra River in my opinion. And the A-235 missile defense system (Nudol) is apparently named after this river. [Quote = Yuyuk] [/ quote]

            Yes, we can perceive these names wink but the so-called n (artne) ram, to make it easier to eat, you need to chew everything hi
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 30 November 2017 16: 46 New
      12
      We cannot launch our satellites, so we’ll learn how to shoot down strangers. laughing
      1. bald
        bald 30 November 2017 17: 01 New
        +1
        Damn, well, I made a mistake on the topic, God happens, but honestly I’m listening to your thoughts - on the case.
      2. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 30 November 2017 17: 51 New
        +7
        Quote: siberalt
        We cannot launch our satellites, so we’ll learn how to shoot down strangers.

        laughing This ..... type of "motto" of air defense? “We don’t fly ourselves and don’t give others”!
    5. SOF
      SOF 30 November 2017 16: 54 New
      0
      Quote: Primoos
      How interesting, Rudolph! Why not Adolf? The imagination of our developers knows no bounds. Both in technology and in names.

      ... I believe that the name is for conspiracy, he should work with foreigners.
      1. sabakina
        sabakina 30 November 2017 19: 05 New
        +3
        Quote: SOF
        ... I believe that the name is for conspiracy, he should work with foreigners.
        I present a picture of how our rocket is talking to their satellite! wink
    6. NEXUS
      NEXUS 30 November 2017 17: 13 New
      +8
      Quote: Primoos
      How interesting, Rudolph! Why not Adolf? The imagination of our developers knows no bounds. Both in technology and in names.

      Still, they would stick to the Rudolph surname-Ivanov, for greater merriment. I believe that this work is carried out on the basis of the IP program, which was in force during the USSR.
      IS (Satellite Fighter) - a series of Soviet interceptor satellites. The idea of ​​the complex was proposed by V. N. Chelomey. The complex was put into service in 1978 and stood on alert until 1993. The IS was launched into orbit by the Cyclone-2 launch vehicle, it intercepted the target already in the second or subsequent turns and hit the enemy spacecraft (SC) with a directed explosion with a stream of striking elements

      A low bow to Chelomei.
      1. bald
        bald 30 November 2017 17: 33 New
        +1
        You are NEX - in your repertoire. --- Respect for thoughts.
        1. bald
          bald 30 November 2017 17: 47 New
          +1
          There is one problem, if you can specify - any satellite displacement (with an armed laser), in orbit - these are not just our words - these are fluctuations in the magnetic fields of the sun and in accordance with the earth. And our laser and their toy is definitely a toy (only for others).
          .
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 30 November 2017 18: 10 New
            +6
            Quote: bald
            And our laser and their toy is definitely a toy (only for others).

            Not a laser was used in the IP ... but the first gun capable of working in space ..
            The IS spacecraft prototypes were the maneuvering satellites Flight-1 and Flight-2. “Flight-1” was launched on November 1, 1963 in the USSR from the Tyura-Tam training ground (Baikonur), “Flight-2” started on April 12, 1964. As a launch vehicle, a two-stage version of the R-7A (8A92) rocket was used. Satellites were created in OKB-52 under the leadership of V.N. Chelomey. The spacecraft of Flight type had a mass of 1959 kg and consisted of a cylindrical instrument compartment and an engine part in which four spherical fuel tanks surrounded the main engine. The Flight devices were equipped with a reusable propulsion system consisting of six engines with a thrust of 400 kgf each for issuing impulses in the longitudinal and four transverse directions, as well as a rocket engine with rigid and soft stabilization thrust of 16 and 1 kgf respectively. In the dashboard there was a warhead with shrapnel, the fuses on the rods were pulled far beyond the dashboard

            We have already seen as what kind of great-grandfather of a blaster from the USSR it was, and now there is still a variant of space weapons.

            A quarter of a century after the end of the Cold War, we can finally see the world's only cannon firing in space. Installed on the Almaz space station in the early 1970s, the R-23M Kartech cannon was a deep modernization of the 23 mm automatic air gun. Only this year, thanks to a Russian television show, we were able to find out how she looked.

            From the very beginning of space exploration, the Kremlin feared that American spacecraft would detect and destroy (or capture) secret Soviet military satellites. Therefore, it is not surprising that back in the 1960s, they began to think about providing military and manned spacecraft with self-defense weapons.

            The development of such a gun was entrusted to the design office of Alexander Nudelman, famous for many breakthrough developments during the Second World War. The developed automatic gun could hit targets at a distance of up to four kilometers. According to various sources, the rate of fire "Karteci" varied between 950 and 5000 rounds per minute, and the flight speed of 200-gram shells was 690 meters per second.

            1. bald
              bald 30 November 2017 18: 25 New
              +1
              By and large, they are not tested (you give only the characteristics, without results, of that time) --- I think that all development is only in progress. We still cannot launch a rocket by way. Sincerely.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 30 November 2017 18: 26 New
                +2
                Quote: bald
                By and large, they are not tested (you give only the characteristics, without results, of that time) --- I think that all development is only in progress. We still cannot launch a rocket by way. Sincerely.

                On February 16, 1976 at 08:29 Moscow time, the first (?) IS spacecraft (Cosmos-2) was launched with the help of the Cyclone-804 LV. He made a non-destructive interception of the Cosmos-803 satellite before it was withdrawn from orbit. Ceased to exist on February 16, 1976.

                The second spacecraft IS Cosmos-814, launched on April 13, 1976 at 17:16 Moscow time, repeated the non-destructive interception of the Cosmos-803 satellite.

                July 21, 1976 at 15:14 Moscow time, the third spacecraft IS Cosmos-843 intercepted and destroyed Cosmos-839.
            2. sabakina
              sabakina 30 November 2017 19: 07 New
              +2
              Andrei hi , if my memory serves me, we made a firearm for space ... repeat
              1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Piramidon
            Piramidon 30 November 2017 18: 15 New
            0
            Quote: bald
            There is one problem, if you can specify - any satellite displacement (with an armed laser), in orbit - these are not just our words - these are fluctuations in the magnetic fields of the sun and in accordance with the earth. And our laser and their toy is definitely a toy (only for others).
            .

            This is you bent !!! But there is better:
            From the point of view of banal erdition — every individual who critically motivates abstraction cannot ignore the criteria of topical subjectivity, conceptually interpreted generally accepted defanizing polarizers, therefore consensus, achieved dialectical material classification of universal motivations that are problematic aspects. good laughing
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 30 November 2017 18: 20 New
              +3
              Quote: Piramidon
              From the point of view of banal erdition — every individual who critically motivates abstraction cannot ignore the criteria of topical subjectivity, conceptually interpreted generally accepted defanizing polarizers, therefore consensus, achieved dialectical material classification of universal motivations that are problematic aspects.

              The Gorbachevsky speech is out of place here ... it's his wanderings in the dark of political terms, if sclerosis doesn’t fail me ...
              There are developments on IP, and most likely they became the basis for this new program.
            2. bald
              bald 1 December 2017 01: 18 New
              0
              I know a bit of science - and the condates, who were helped by a laboratory technician.
    7. Piramidon
      Piramidon 30 November 2017 18: 08 New
      0
      Quote: Primoos
      How interesting, Rudolph! Why not Adolf? The imagination of our developers knows no bounds. Both in technology and in names.

      Maybe the designer called dad Rudolph, and you immediately thought of something obscene.
    8. PalBor
      PalBor 30 November 2017 18: 17 New
      +1
      Quote: Primoos
      How interesting, Rudolph! Why not Adolf? The imagination of our developers knows no bounds. Both in technology and in names.

      Maybe in honor of Rudolph Abel.
      Or maybe the constructor’s wife’s name is so beloved.
      The main thing is to work for the "joy" of adversaries.
    9. Ilya-spb
      Ilya-spb 30 November 2017 18: 34 New
      +1
      Emperor Rudolph II! Alchemist and sorcerer! (c) Hippo. "The Master and Margarita"
  2. 210ox
    210ox 30 November 2017 16: 08 New
    +9
    Soviet endless? By the way, what about the bottom rocket? .... I’m all silent, otherwise they can come after me ..
    1. Going
      Going 30 November 2017 16: 12 New
      +7
      Most likely, such developments were carried out for a long time, by the way, the United States, too.
      1. jjj
        jjj 30 November 2017 16: 35 New
        +1
        In times of "glasnost" information slipped about the deployment of underwater launch systems in good reach from the adversary. I won’t be surprised if such people stand in the Gulf of Mexico. So Cuba was not required
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. weksha50
      weksha50 30 November 2017 16: 44 New
      +1
      Quote: 210ox
      Soviet endless? By the way, what about the bottom rocket? .... I’m all silent, otherwise they can come after me ..


      This idea was still in the second half of the 80s ... The afftor of this idea was not sent to a psychiatric hospital ... hi
      By the way, I also think this idea is crazy ... And anyone who tries to spend the allocated money on this idea is definitely an enemy and a pest ... hi
      I repeat: this is purely my personal opinion ...
      1. SOF
        SOF 30 November 2017 16: 56 New
        +1
        . enemy and pest

        ... or genius.
        1. weksha50
          weksha50 30 November 2017 16: 58 New
          +1
          Quote: SOF
          ... or genius.


          Oh come on .. Not even funny ...
          If you have at least some kind of technical education, then you yourself will see a lot of insurmountable obstacles ...
          Let us not forget that genius is a kind of mental deviation in development ... laughing
          1. SOF
            SOF 30 November 2017 18: 19 New
            +1
            ... and I do not argue with you.
            Just time will tell if there are insurmountable obstacles in order to overcome them.
            And the statement that genius and folly, sometimes, two sides of one essence, I support
            yes
          2. Yuyuka
            Yuyuka 30 November 2017 19: 22 New
            +1
            Let us not forget that genius is a kind of mental deviation in development ...

            from the point of view of patients of the psychiatric dispensary, there is only one abnormal one in their close-knit team - sticks to everyone, rubs into trust, conducts emotional conversations, and he wears a syringe in his pocket and tries to prick everything belay
    4. Piramidon
      Piramidon 30 November 2017 18: 42 New
      0
      Quote: 210ox
      Soviet endless? By the way, what about the bottom rocket? .... I’m all silent, otherwise they can come after me ..

      "For secret services, you, as a carrier of classified information, are of no interest. Pay taxes and sleep peacefully."
      ============== NKVD of the USSR === laughing
    5. dubovitskiy.1947
      dubovitskiy.1947 30 November 2017 18: 58 New
      +1
      Quote: 210ox
      Soviet endless? By the way, what about the bottom rocket? .... I’m all silent, otherwise they can come after me ..

      Late. Knock Knock.
  3. Strashila
    Strashila 30 November 2017 16: 21 New
    +3
    And what to create it ... it already exists ... in one fell swoop 19 satellites killing.
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 30 November 2017 16: 37 New
      -1
      That is, it is now necessary to stop all developments, get into a circle and whine what is all gone?
      1. Strashila
        Strashila 30 November 2017 18: 40 New
        0
        She ... supplement the experience of the West ... take a paper bag and breathe faster in it with my mouth ... and periodically moan ushef uvse disappeared.
    2. neri73-r
      neri73-r 30 November 2017 17: 12 New
      0
      Are you talking about effective managers? So we will soon shoot them or put them in prison! am
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic 30 November 2017 16: 25 New
    +1
    If the rockets continue to be afraid of space, falling to the ground with fear, then these satellites will be launched by the Chinese or Indians!
    1. faiver
      faiver 30 November 2017 16: 36 New
      +1
      and what’s the rocket here? the union worked perfectly ...
      1. Herculesic
        Herculesic 30 November 2017 17: 20 New
        0
        And how many missiles "did not work perfectly"? How many satellites are lost forever? ???
      2. dubovitskiy.1947
        dubovitskiy.1947 30 November 2017 19: 01 New
        0
        Quote: faiver
        and what’s the rocket here? the union worked perfectly ...

        Something comes to mind the message that they switched to digital control. But I don’t remember where, either on a ship, or on a carrier.
  5. ImPerts
    ImPerts 30 November 2017 16: 31 New
    0
    If our sworn “partners” refused the ABM treaty and keep obscure vehicles in space (I'm talking about X-37), then why not take up counteraction in space?
    1. Viktor.12.71
      Viktor.12.71 30 November 2017 16: 59 New
      0
      The USA can afford it, just as the best minds flow right there because the Americans provide the finances, equipment and conditions to the masters. DARPA still works, and who knows what else is there besides the non-advertised object X-37B.
      1. ImPerts
        ImPerts 30 November 2017 17: 29 New
        0
        And where is my comment?
        Due to the fact that there are "better minds and a lot of money" now you need to "sit and be afraid"?
        1. Viktor.12.71
          Viktor.12.71 1 December 2017 09: 53 New
          0
          And how without scientists and money these days to develop something, let alone counteract the one who has all this in abundance? A century of high technology after all.
          1. ImPerts
            ImPerts 1 December 2017 14: 18 New
            0
            And then what is it?
            http://free-news.su/interesnoe/3364-rossiya-zapus
            tila-istrebiteli-sputnikov
            1. Viktor.12.71
              Viktor.12.71 2 December 2017 10: 26 New
              0
              Well yes. The legacy of the USSR. Bravo!
              1. ImPerts
                ImPerts 2 December 2017 11: 04 New
                0
                Quote: Viktor.12.71
                Well yes. The legacy of the USSR. Bravo!

                And the legacy of the USSR is in a secluded place and waiting for the post-Soviet descendant monkey to accidentally press a button?
                1. Viktor.12.71
                  Viktor.12.71 2 December 2017 12: 44 New
                  0
                  Do you yourself understand what you are carrying? The developments of the USSR are more than 30-40 years old, for that time they were breakthrough. And now they are out of date. You yourself are not funny what is shown on TV? I laughed with the robot Avatar that Rogozin is so proud of, this robot is 20 years old.
                  1. ImPerts
                    ImPerts 2 December 2017 15: 20 New
                    0
                    Yes, yes, everything is gone, the plaster is removed, the client leaves.
                    Since the time of the Wright brothers and Mozhaisky, nothing new has been invented, only everything is being repeated and repeated. As Christie did his tank, so it all improve and improve.
                    Maybe you need to read fewer newspapers at breakfast? It will be written there that you will have to repeat the feat of US Secretary of Defense Forrestal smile
                    Read pleasant, it will improve digestion, and at the same time mood wink
                    For example, this:
                    Russia has taken a leading position in the world in a key area of ​​the latest weapons - ground combat robots. This is stated in the latest issue of the influential British science weekly New Scientist

                    Z.Y. I do not watch TV wassat
                    And I do not advise you bully
                    1. Viktor.12.71
                      Viktor.12.71 2 December 2017 17: 52 New
                      +1
                      The fact that Russia is a leader in the field of robotics is a myth. That's when they start to do something like that, I will be calm.
  6. bald
    bald 30 November 2017 16: 31 New
    0
    And what, when it was already and the “fetters” were removed, it’s great, of course, and I don’t want to offend the developers (Garina), I joke there is one, so far we should not know the technology.
  7. weksha50
    weksha50 30 November 2017 16: 40 New
    +1
    "It is planned to create or complete the creation of a stationary strategic missile system" Sarmat ", PAK FA, .... etc., etc."....

    Here ... Do not hit only with your legs down .... Does it seem to me alone, or not?
    It seems that SO thus loudly declaring to the whole world about their military developments and showing goals and deadlines, our leaders thereby provoke the so-called public into confidence in "Russian aggression" and give rise to even hot heads in the minds to quickly deal with Russia, while she did not gain the appropriate strength and power ???
    Why, quietly, as in Soviet times, invent and produce dad-mom-uncle-aunt-bomb-rocket-airplane, etc. ? So that later for the enemy it would be a surprise? request
    1. Bronevick
      Bronevick 30 November 2017 16: 47 New
      0
      Everyone understands that this weapon will not arrive soon, but there is a threat now. When it goes into service, it will not be as unique as it will take a long time. This new weapon may not even give the declared indicators, but the main thing is to intimidate the enemy.
    2. ImPerts
      ImPerts 30 November 2017 17: 35 New
      +1
      Quote: weksha50
      It seems that SO is loudly declaring to the whole world about its military developments and showing goals and

      Unfortunately, in our country, we have a lot of people who want to tell everything voluntarily or involuntarily.
      I hope that now in the army they got rid of those who like to take "photos" ...
    3. SOF
      SOF 30 November 2017 18: 12 New
      +1
      ... "Prevented scrum - this is a scrum won!" Zigaro Cano.
      Knowing the adversary that we have a good, regularly upgraded, and sometimes innovative club gives him the opportunity to think carefully about whether it is worthwhile, once again, to come to us with silly intentions.
  8. Bronevick
    Bronevick 30 November 2017 16: 43 New
    0
    And his name is Union 2.1b
  9. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 30 November 2017 16: 45 New
    +2
    And what? 80's anti-satellite missile sorted out?
  10. bald
    bald 30 November 2017 16: 57 New
    0
    Quote: bald
    For lasers - we are the first and the developments are inferior to ours. “The hyperboloid of engineer Garin” is a fantastic novel by A. N. Tolstoy, completed by 1927.

    And ring --- "not inferior to the laers." - sorry.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. _Jack_
    _Jack_ 30 November 2017 17: 17 New
    +2
    We have long and very effectively destroyed satellites in decent quantities, and bourgeois and ours - when we try to put them into orbit. Just the other day they drowned another batch.
    1. bald
      bald 1 December 2017 01: 26 New
      0
      It’s completely different, I’ll say more, this secret thing.
  13. Sergey53
    Sergey53 30 November 2017 17: 51 New
    0
    In general, it is better to voice such news when we already have it. But already tired of reading about what weapons we create. And so for a number of years. we have Boreas, but they don’t have Bulava missiles advertised for them. What a shame and "share the skin of an unkilled bear." Already had to be in a situation where the missile system was and satellites for topographic location were never created. How much money was spent wasted.
    1. bk316
      bk316 30 November 2017 19: 22 New
      +2
      but they don’t have Bulava rockets advertised for them

      Wow ... Does everyone lie? Nevsky and Monomakh go without rockets?
      1. Sergey53
        Sergey53 30 November 2017 20: 05 New
        0
        And the rest with what? Or is there enough for two? Are they adopted? No.
  14. Vadim237
    Vadim237 30 November 2017 18: 42 New
    +1
    It would be better to develop a single-stage aerospace aircraft than any crap. This will be possible to shoot down the enemy and save our satellites, in the event that they go into an off-design orbit or the connection is lost.
  15. Blue fox
    Blue fox 30 November 2017 21: 14 New
    +1
    So far, Russian officials are the best weapon to destroy satellites. sad
  16. owl
    owl 30 November 2017 21: 59 New
    +2
    "Russia creates weapons to destroy satellites"
    Not a "Frigate" case called laughing
  17. Bolo
    Bolo 30 November 2017 22: 24 New
    +3
    I know the absolute weapon against satellites: the Frigate boost block, the Soyuz 2.1b rocket, and all the Roskosmos!
  18. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur 1 December 2017 10: 39 New
    0
    Rudolph was the name of the deer at Santa Claus. And where does the mobile shock anti-satellite complex. Or is this information for deer?
  19. Romanenko
    Romanenko 1 December 2017 22: 38 New
    0
    Well, another surprise from Uncle Vova, gentlemen of Tolerast.
    As they say Rudolph sneaked up unnoticed .... laughing