Military Review

The batch of serial Su-34 transferred to the troops

29
Avia Concern today "Dry" transmits aviation equipment in the part of the Russian Aerospace Forces. The company's press service reports on the transfer of a batch of front-line bombers Su-34. From the press service of the enterprise:
The company "Sukhoi" handed over another batch of Su-34 front-line bombers to the Russian Defense Ministry as part of the 2017 state defense order of the year. The aircraft flew from the airfield of the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant named. V.P. Chkalov and headed to the place of their deployment.



The press service of the concern, which is structurally part of the United Aircraft Building Corporation, reminds us that the state contract involves the supply of new aircraft to the troops for the period up to 2020 of the year. In particular, it is planned to deliver the Su-34 front-line bombers to various military districts.

The batch of serial Su-34 transferred to the troops


Su-34 - a multi-purpose aircraft, in addition to the functions of a bomber capable of performing actions inherent in a fighter. Refers to the generation of 4 ++. It has modern radar equipment, upgraded guidance systems and electronic warfare.

A few weeks ago, pilots of the ZVO of an air unit stationed in the Voronezh region, at the Kapustin Yar range near Astrakhan, practiced the use of Khibiny electronic jamming systems on Su-34 aircraft.
Photos used:
MO RF
29 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. _Jack_
    _Jack_ 24 November 2017 14: 15 New
    +3
    There was information that in Syria they did not really show themselves in terms of reliability, but, of course, no one will tell us the details.
    1. maxim947
      maxim947 24 November 2017 14: 20 New
      16
      where was this information? From a source close to MO?)) There was a lot of information and for the most part reviews are good, even very good.
      1. zivXP
        zivXP 24 November 2017 14: 26 New
        +8
        From a source close to MO?

        Apparently the US Ministry of Defense, as they say the Pentagon.
      2. 79807420129
        79807420129 24 November 2017 14: 28 New
        10
        In the classification of "not partners" for NATO, the "hell duckling" wink
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 24 November 2017 14: 41 New
          +7
          Quote: 79807420129
          In the classification of "not partners" for NATO, the "hell duckling"

          Su-34 "Duckling" (product "T-10V", according to NATO codification: Fullback - Defender)
          Quote: _Jack_
          There was information that in Syria they did not really show themselves in terms of reliability, but, of course, no one will tell us the details.

          There are always problems with new equipment and that is why during operation it is brought to perfection all its military life. SU-34 is no exception. Problems have been found and are being fixed. I don’t see a negative point in this, but I think it’s positive, on the contrary, the sooner we find problems in combat conditions, the faster we will fix them, which means we will make the 34th better.
          1. Trevis
            Trevis 24 November 2017 14: 50 New
            0
            Quote: NEXUS
            Fullback

            Sorry, but what kind of defender is this? Incorrect translation of the word. repeat
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 24 November 2017 14: 59 New
              +3
              Quote: Trevis
              Sorry, but what kind of defender is this? Incorrect translation of the word.

              The translation is correct ...
              Fullback-Full back, or another translation ... Defender (n.

              defender, back, protector, quarterback, advocate, guard) hi
      3. Burbon
        Burbon 24 November 2017 14: 29 New
        0
        Quote: maxim947
        From a source close to MO?))

        no, specifically from the MO, not the source
      4. Samaritan
        Samaritan 24 November 2017 15: 25 New
        +2
        Oh, I love New Year's Eve, so much technology goes, you’ll swing good good good
        “Within the framework of the state defense order in the air defense units located in the Republic of Karelia, the Leningrad and Kursk Regions, six Su-35S multi-purpose fighters and three Su-30SM fighters arrived. (24.11.2017)

        https://ria.ru/defense_safety/20171124/1509495942
        .html? referrer_block = index_archive_3

        And the handsome SU-34:
    2. kirgiz58
      kirgiz58 24 November 2017 14: 21 New
      10
      Quote: _Jack_
      There was information that in Syria

      I myself, the daughter of an officer, heard this. laughing laughing
    3. 79807420129
      79807420129 24 November 2017 14: 22 New
      +9
      Quote: _Jack_
      There was information that in Syria they did not show themselves very well in terms of reliability

      Do not throw a link hi
      Quote: _Jack_
      details, of course, no one will tell us

      Oh yes, of course, I forgot the old one. request laughing
      1. Jedi
        Jedi 24 November 2017 14: 27 New
        +4
        Vlad, and this is not another specialist "from there"? wink
      2. Burbon
        Burbon 24 November 2017 14: 30 New
        +1
        Quote: 79807420129
        Do not throw a link

        Yandex to help you ... work hard yourself, unless of course you are interested ... it is to the khibiny that the military has the most complaints!
        1. 79807420129
          79807420129 24 November 2017 14: 41 New
          +4
          Quote: Burbon
          it is to the khibiny that the military has the most complaints!

          Moreover, Dmitry "Khibiny" and Syria.
          the use of complexes of electronic suppression "Khibiny" on aircraft Su-34.

          This is Dmitry equipment for the SU-34, what is the aircraft unreliable in?hi
          1. Burbon
            Burbon 24 November 2017 16: 44 New
            +1
            Quote: 79807420129
            Moreover, Dmitry "Khibiny" and Syria.

            the use of hibin in Syria, the military has caused the most complaints
            Quote: 79807420129
            This is Dmitry equipment for the SU-34, what is the aircraft unreliable in?

            This equipment is not only for the Su-34, but the aircraft is completely reliable for itself, but did I say the opposite?
            1. 79807420129
              79807420129 24 November 2017 17: 27 New
              +4
              Quote: Burbon
              the use of hibin in Syria, the military has caused the most complaints

              Thanks Dmitry, I hope to bring to mind hi
    4. Piramidon
      Piramidon 24 November 2017 14: 33 New
      +3
      Quote: _Jack_
      There was information that in Syria they did not really show themselves in terms of reliability, but, of course, no one will tell us the details.

      As always. "From an unnamed source who wishes to remain anonymous"
      1. alexmach
        alexmach 24 November 2017 16: 57 New
        0
        No, there was even information in VO from representatives of the Moscow Region that for the SU-34, according to the results of the Syrian company, requirements were formulated for modernization and elimination of shortcomings. The fact that "did not show themselves very much" was not information.
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 24 November 2017 18: 02 New
          +1
          Quote: alexmach
          there was even information in VO from representatives of the Moscow Region that for the SU-34, according to the results of the Syrian company, requirements were formulated to modernize and eliminate shortcomings

          The man, as they say, "heard a ringing ..." and made his conclusions. Well, since any aircraft in the process of operation is being finalized from the beginning of production to decommissioning. I remember our Tu-95RC. The former have already been carved into metal, and the latter have been staffed by teams of factory finalists, making constructive changes. For each failure, we were obliged to draw up a card and they entered the factory. As information accumulated, decisions were made to carry out improvements.
    5. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 24 November 2017 14: 38 New
      +1
      Actually the opposite is true. These aircraft (SU-34) showed excellent results. Even the NATO Air Force praised them. And where do you get this info ...?
    6. seti
      seti 24 November 2017 14: 44 New
      0
      Give specific examples in terms of the unreliability of the Su-34 ..
      If there were problems or shortcomings with them, probably taking the experience of the Syrian company, they are eliminated or are being eliminated.
      The second good news for the Russian Air Force for the day.
    7. okko077
      okko077 24 November 2017 15: 37 New
      +3
      There was information that in Syria they did not really show themselves in terms of reliability, but, of course, no one will tell us the details.
      No one on this site and on the Internet can have such information. Despite the weak signature stamp “Particleboard” you won’t find this information ... For this you need to serve not just in aviation, but directly on concrete and still have an engineering background and position ... Such people are units and they serve as a source of information for the army of loafers in Research institutes, institutes, etc. This is bad on the one hand, but not very ...
      Su-34 spent aircraft, the continuation of the SU-27 ... But the military will not tell you anything about the sighting and navigation system ... Such is the specifics ... Here are only the results of combat use and indirect facts ... The SU-24M is just rubbish in comparison with the SU-34 ... BUT it has an SVP-24 and for some reason it is used in Syria ... the Su-24M is much more expensive to operate and not economical and has a huge preparation time ... Why is it still used in Syria? Why is it not replaced by the SU-34 completely? Their answer is few and it is necessary to save the resource that doesn’t work ... So we don’t know something, but soon we will get the answer to this question ...
  2. Livonetc
    Livonetc 24 November 2017 14: 34 New
    0
    Even if they showed flaws somewhere in Syria, then this is very good.
    Will finalize.
    Further fully armed and fully operational.
    "And if the enemy dares to test our strength.
    We will forever wean him. "
  3. HEATHER
    HEATHER 24 November 2017 14: 41 New
    +1
    Filming a year ago. About the reliability of the Su-34, this is not discussed. Someone blurted out about its unreliability, someone picked up, ignoring the facts. Sometimes you need to be interested in machines on certain sites where people who use this aircraft express their opinions .
  4. Nemesis
    Nemesis 24 November 2017 15: 31 New
    0
    And how many this time, 2 or 3 ?! ....
    1. IL-18
      IL-18 24 November 2017 16: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: Nemesis
      And how many this time, 2 or 3 ?! ....

      At the citizen Sobchak and from 1 thong dig in. Deep.
      1. Nemesis
        Nemesis 24 November 2017 16: 17 New
        0
        It is more likely that such quantities cause her joy ...
    2. VohaAhov
      VohaAhov 24 November 2017 17: 30 New
      +1
      Usually, they transfer a batch of 4 aircraft. Most likely this is the case this time.
  5. AllXVahhaB
    AllXVahhaB 24 November 2017 17: 30 New
    +1
    And what is the size of the batch?