The batch of serial Su-34 transferred to the troops

Today the aviation concern "Dry" transfers aviation equipment in the part of the RF Aerospace Forces. The press service of the company informs about the transfer of a batch of front-line bombers Su-34. From the message of the press service of the enterprise:

The Sukhoi company handed over to the Russian Ministry of Defense another batch of front-line Su-34 bombers as part of the 2017 state defense order. The planes took off from the airfield of the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant. V.P. Chkalov and went to the place of their deployment.

The press service of the concern, which is structurally part of the United Aircraft Corporation, recalls that the state contract provides for the supply of new aircraft equipment to the troops for the period until 2020. In particular, it is planned to supply the aforementioned Su-34 front-line bombers to various military districts.

Su-34 is a multipurpose aircraft, in addition to the functions of a bomber, capable of performing actions inherent in a fighter. Belongs to generation 4 ++. It has modern radar equipment, modernized guidance and electronic warfare systems.

Several weeks ago, pilots of the Western Military District of the air unit stationed in the Voronezh region, at the Kapustin Yar training ground near Astrakhan, practiced the use of the Khibiny electronic suppression systems on Su-34 aircraft.

Comments

[_Jack_]

There was information that in Syria they did not show themselves very well in terms of reliability, but, of course, no one will tell us the details.

[maxim947]

where was this information? From a source close to MO?)) There was a lot of information and for the most part the reviews are good, even very good.

[zivXP]

From a source close to MO?

Apparently the US Department of Defense, as they say, the Pentagon.

[79807420129]

In the classification of "non-partners" in NATO, "the hellish duckling"

[NEXUS]

Quote: 79807420129

In the classification of "non-partners" in NATO, "the hellish duckling"

Su-34 "Duck" (product "T-10V", according to NATO codification: Fullback - "Defender")

Quote: _Jack_

There was information that in Syria they did not show themselves very well in terms of reliability, but, of course, no one will tell us the details.

There are always problems with new equipment, and that is why, in the course of operation, it is brought to perfection throughout its military life. The SU-34 is no exception. Problems have been found and are being fixed. I don't see a negative point in this, but I think it is, on the contrary, positive, because the sooner we identify problems in combat conditions, the sooner we will eliminate them, which means we will make 34 better.

[Trevis]

Quote: NEXUS

Fullback

Sorry, but what kind of defender is this? Wrong translation of the word.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Trevis

Sorry, but what kind of defender is this? Wrong translation of the word.

The translation is correct ...
Fullback-Fullback, or another translation ... Defender (noun.

defender, back, protector, quarterback, advocate, guard)

[Bourbon]

Quote: maxim947

From a source close to MO?))

no, specifically from the MO, not the source

[Samaritan]

Eh, I love New Year's Eve, so much technology goes, you will download
“Within the framework of the state defense order, six Su-35S and three Su-30SM multipurpose fighters arrived in the ZVO air unit stationed in the Republic of Karelia, Leningrad and Kursk regions. (24.11.2017)

https://ria.ru/defense_safety/20171124/1509495942
.html? referrer_block = index_archive_3

And the handsome SU-34:

[kirgiz58]

Quote: _Jack_

There was information that in Syria

I myself, the daughter of an officer, heard that.

[79807420129]

Quote: _Jack_

There was information that in Syria they did not show themselves very well in terms of reliability

Do not throw a link

Quote: _Jack_

of course, no one will tell us the details

Oh yes, of course, I forgot the old one.

[Jedi]

Vlad, is this not another specialist "from there"?

[Bourbon]

Quote: 79807420129

Do not throw a link

Yandex to help you ... work hard yourself, unless of course you are interested ... it is to the khibiny that the military has the most complaints!

[79807420129]

Quote: Burbon

the military has the most complaints about the Khibins!

Moreover, Dmitry "Khibiny" and Syria.

the use of Khibiny electronic suppression systems on Su-34 aircraft.

This is Dmitry equipment for the SU-34, what is the aircraft unreliable in?

[Bourbon]

Quote: 79807420129

Moreover, Dmitry "Khibiny" and Syria.

the use of hibin in Syria, the military has caused the most complaints

Quote: 79807420129

This is Dmitry equipment for the SU-34, what is the aircraft unreliable in?

This equipment is not only for the Su-34, but the aircraft is completely reliable for itself, but did I say the opposite?

[79807420129]

Quote: Burbon

the use of hibin in Syria, the military has caused the most complaints

Thank you Dmitry, I hope they will bring to mind

[Piramidon]

Quote: _Jack_

There was information that in Syria they did not show themselves very well in terms of reliability, but, of course, no one will tell us the details.

As always. "From an unnamed source who wishes to remain anonymous"

[alexmach]

No, there was even on the VO information from representatives of the Ministry of Defense that for the SU-34, based on the results of the Syrian company, requirements were formulated for modernization and elimination of shortcomings. There was no information that "showed themselves not very well".

[Piramidon]

Quote: alexmach

there was even information on the VO from representatives of the Ministry of Defense that for the SU-34, based on the results of the Syrian company, requirements for modernization and elimination of shortcomings were formulated

The man, as they say, "heard the ringing ..." and drew his own conclusions. Well, any aircraft in the process of operation is being finalized from the beginning of production to decommissioning. I remember our Tu-95RTs. The first ones were already cut into metal, and the last ones were worked by brigades of factory workers, making constructive changes. We were obliged to draw up a card for each refusal and they went to the plant. As the information accumulated, decisions were made to carry out improvements.

[Alexey-74]

In fact, the opposite is true. These aircraft (SU-34) proved to be excellent. Even the NATO Air Force appreciated them. And where do you get this information ...?

[seti]

Give specific examples in terms of the unreliability of the Su-34 ..
If there were problems or shortcomings with them, they were probably eliminated or are in the process of being eliminated taking into account the experience of the Syrian company.
The second good news for the RF Aerospace Forces of the day.

[okko077]

There was information that in Syria they did not show themselves very well in terms of reliability, but, of course, no one will tell us the details.
No one on this site and on the Internet can have such information. Despite the weak "chipboard" stamp, you will not find this information ... For this you need to serve not just in aviation, but directly on concrete and also have an engineering education and position ... There are only a few such people and they serve as a source of information for the army of idlers in Research institutes, institutes, etc. On the one hand, this is bad, but on the other, not very ...
The Su-34 is a spent aircraft, a continuation of the SU-27 ... But the military will not tell you anything about the sighting and navigation system ... This is the specificity ... Here are only the results of combat use and circumstantial facts ... The SU-24M is just rubbish aircraft compared to the SU-34 ... BUT it has an SVP-24 and for some reason it is used in Syria ... The Su-24M is much more expensive to operate and not economical and has a long preparation time ... Why is it still used in Syria? Why didn't the SU-34 replace it completely? Their answer is few and the resource must be conserved ... So we don’t know something ... but we will soon get the answer to this question ...

[Livonetc]

Even if in Syria they showed shortcomings somewhere, it would be very good.
Will finalize.
Further fully armed and full combat readiness.
"And if the enemy dares to test our strength.
We will forever wean him. "

[HEATHER]

Filming a year ago. About the reliability of the Su-34, this is not discussed. Someone blurted out about its unreliability, someone picked it up, disregarding the facts. Sometimes you need to be interested in machines on certain sites where people operating this aircraft express their opinions ...

[Nemesis]

And how many this time, 2 or 3 ?! ....

[IL-18]

Quote: Nemesis

And how many this time, 2 or 3 ?! ....

Citizen Sobchak and from 1 thongs bite. Deep.

[Nemesis]

It is more likely that such quantities make her happy ...

[VohaAhov]

Usually, they transmit a batch of 4 planes. This is most likely the case this time too.

[AllXVahhaB]

And what is the batch size?