Military Review

Travels of the Colorado Cockroach. Radioactive thoughts

10



Greetings to you, my dear and very necessary people to me. Readers and readers, young and sophisticated life experiences, beautiful and intelligent, shaved and bearded, hairy and bald. I greet everyone together and everyone personally.

In several articles I tried to combine reflections on events in Ukraine and my own photo stories. But even despite your comments, I realized that two such voluminous topics are difficult to combine into one. It turns out that both topics have to be squeezed to the state of dried fruit.

Therefore, having thought well and asked for the permission of the editorial board, I decided to gobble up another type of my narratives. The photographs that I already have and which will still appear are purely mine, a crap look at life. Maybe the right one, maybe not. But my.

I remembered a mathematician here. George Danzig. He got into about the same situation while still a graduate student. As often happens with young people, George somehow slept at the beginning of the lecture. I rushed to the university, and the couple is already, in a sense, over. Only on the board is some kind of equation written down. He returned home and a few days reproached himself for the missed lecture. Already very difficult was the equation. But decided!

Satisfied, brings the decision to his professor and sees that the decision somehow badly affects the face of the teacher. In general, it turned out that the graduate student solved two unsolvable problems in statistics, which many scientists from all over the world were beating on. So that's me. Maybe accidentally opening a new genre in journalism will do ...

So, today I will tell you and show some more of the materials about Pripyat and Chernobyl.

And the first thing I wanted to say is about those who lead tours there. About guides. Or guides who very sensibly explain the events that occurred in 1986 year. But on the other hand, already at the approach to the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, it is explained that the new safe shelter (confinement) is nothing more than an exemplary cut of the budget. 44 countries have allocated Ukraine 2,5 billion to germoarku.

Probably, now you thought that the Cockroach had messed up something. 44 countries! This is how many engineers and scientists? Did they not say that this project is complete, but expensive, stupid?

Have told. And proved. Moreover, in these countries, like us, there was not a single engineer who would agree to give an expert assessment of the sarcophagus. About the ability to contain radiation and emissions say. But about the timing of no. Who knows, this sarcophagus. The roof is not sealed. Some precipitation is pumped out to 1000 tons per year.

The main thing that I planned was. Between workers (do not be surprised, but there are a lot of workers and engineers) to knock. Talk to listen. Take pictures where the guard will not notice.

By the way, the security at the Chernobyl NPP is notable. Full set. From a few hundred of the National Guard on horseback patrols and all flying video cameras. I don’t even want to write about the primitive thorn everywhere. The mouse will not slip. Only a cockroach. This, by the way, explains the periodic reports about the detention of all stalkers.

I listened to the guards. It is necessary to understand what is all the matter. The case turned out to be really serious. In the 2013 year, when the Maidan was seething and passions going off-scale, several scumbags tried to enter the territory of the Chernobyl NPP. And not just to penetrate, but to wet septic tanks and collect spent nuclear fuel there. For what? About the "dirty" bomb heard, I hope? Good caught them.

Even more interesting was to knock around among the hard workers. I did not divide them there. People walk in robes and gas masks. Who is who? But in the rest room everything was clear. Work at the station Ukrainian and European shift workers. The object is complex. Dangerous. Therefore, the corresponding salary. From 5 000 and up! Only each employee receives "their" money. Europeans - euro, Ukrainians - hryvnia.

Remember, I already showed you a few photos from the zone? There was a frame, which depicts robots used in the elimination of the disaster. Fonti they even today beyond.



And I remembered them because I heard the news that struck me. Soon they will begin to disassemble the 4 power unit! Right under the new arch. Work has already begun.









So, there is no new robots there! And there are no cars with remote control! Will disassemble the workers! I do not know what to call these people. Heroes? Probably. Only here is some kind of artificial heroism. Going to death to save the state? In order for the extra hryvnia to go into someone's pocket? I have no answer ...







I was often tormented by thoughts about why the Chernobyl NPP was completely shut down, and the rest of the nuclear power plants on the territory of Ukraine, using exactly the same reactors, are working. Something does not add up to me. Europeans do not understand that experiments with RBMK reactors are dangerous? Or is it all safe? Especially in our "experimental" time? I had to go deeper. Where there are thinking brains.

It turned out the answer is simple. And he's scary enough. Scary for us, scary for you, scary for Europe. And the answer is in a nutshell: weapons plutonium.

It is plutonium with the least amount of impurities and the highest purity that is obtained when the uranium rods are produced in the RBMK reactors. Our friends from NATO do not see our experiments at nuclear power plants for a reason. They think!

And if they think, they see what? That's right, the source for the accelerated production of high-quality weapons-grade plutonium. Ask Korea and Iran what it is worth launching such a reactor. Good old probable adversary does not shy away from arranging BelorSima and Kievsaki in the 21 century with the help of concrete bombs, the benefit of declaring Ukrainians carriers of communism and terrorists is not a tricky matter, a matter of desire.

It seems we are being tolerated today, thankfully, we seem to be the foremost stronghold of democracy in the struggle against Russia. But how will it turn tomorrow, who knows ...

These are my conclusions ...

That is why the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and mothballed, and, despite the fact that 1 and 2 units could work and work, Europe firmly said: no. Ukraine has enough stations that operate on VVER-type reactors. And about the Chernobyl NPP with its RBMK forget from here and forever.

And considering that we are still monkeys with a grenade, then away from sin in Europe they want it to be an ordinary grenade. Not nuclear bomb.

What we stopped there, on the bans? Even on the bus, all the tourists are warned that it is forbidden to rent everything in the Chernobyl NPP area. For example, a monument and a sarcophagus on the background of it is possible, and the nuclear fuel storage on the left is not, the railway too.
And if you find yourself a warrior who is not too lazy to look out the window, then you are faced with formatting a flash drive and a long and tedious explanatory note that you are not a terrorist and you are not looking for intelligence information here. And it will be a good outcome!

They can bring the handcuffs in the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), because they also have months to fight the Kremlin agents in the Zone and then prove that you are not a camel. Or not an agent of the FSB.







I do not know how you will respond to my report, but I think that you should also be interested in what, God forbid, you can touch Russia and Belarus. And life goes on. Runs to the end of the next year. The next point of reference. And I run. More precisely, we are running with you. Healthy lifestyle.

So we will not stop. See you soon and happiness, health, good luck! Well, when you are, dear people-readers!
Author:
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mik13
    Mik13 22 November 2017 07: 43 New
    +5
    I was often tormented by thoughts about why the Chernobyl NPP was completely closed, and the rest of the nuclear power plants in Ukraine that use exactly the same reactors are working. Something does not add up with me. What Europeans do not understand that experiments with RBMK reactors are dangerous? Or are they safe?
    It seems that the author of the article is Mr. Staver. Such mistakes are just his "signature style."
    So - thoughts tormented in vain, because RBMK reactors at Ukrainian nuclear power plants were only in Chernobyl. All other 15 Ukrainian reactors are VVER reactors.

    ... weapons grade plutonium. It is plutonium with the least amount of impurities and the highest purity that is obtained during the production of uranium rods precisely in RBMK reactors.
    It was in RBMK reactors that weapons-grade plutonium was never developed. Yes, indeed, RBMK is a very "close relative" of production reactors, but it is an energy reactor and is not suitable for the production of plutonium.
    1. andrewkor
      andrewkor 22 November 2017 08: 21 New
      +2
      Yes, God bless him and Staver, the realities are just terrible, and the prospects are even worse!
      1. domokl
        domokl 22 November 2017 10: 51 New
        0
        the advertisement is engine of the trade lol
  2. SASA798
    SASA798 22 November 2017 08: 41 New
    +2
    Gadget, take care of yourself and our nerves. Do not climb where the climate is "different." And an interesting essay from what we call: For what I bought ...
    1. BLOND
      BLOND 22 November 2017 09: 23 New
      +2
      Quote: SASA798
      Gadget, take care of yourself and our nerves. Do not climb where the climate is "different." And an interesting essay from what we call: For what I bought ...

      I agree and read as if he himself there)))
      Thanks to the Cockroach and greeted me)):
      Greetings, my dear .... and bald.
    2. volodimer
      volodimer 27 November 2017 16: 44 New
      0
      I'm sitting at the side of Kim Solntselikogo (Hassan). The seismograph shakes nearby (when the hydrogen flowed, it went off scale). But I’m not scoring for myself as much as for you. Here, on a hike, sort it out ... And you be careful there!
  3. Jedi
    Jedi 22 November 2017 09: 55 New
    +6
    Cockroach, thanks for the story! hi Good luck and look forward to new stories!
  4. certero
    certero 24 November 2017 11: 25 New
    0
    Quote: Mik13
    I was often tormented by thoughts about why the Chernobyl NPP was completely closed, and the rest of the nuclear power plants in Ukraine that use exactly the same reactors are working. Something does not add up with me. What Europeans do not understand that experiments with RBMK reactors are dangerous? Or are they safe?
    It seems that the author of the article is Mr. Staver. Such mistakes are just his "signature style."
    So - thoughts tormented in vain, because RBMK reactors at Ukrainian nuclear power plants were only in Chernobyl. All other 15 Ukrainian reactors are VVER reactors.

    ... weapons grade plutonium. It is plutonium with the least amount of impurities and the highest purity that is obtained during the production of uranium rods precisely in RBMK reactors.
    It was in RBMK reactors that weapons-grade plutonium was never developed. Yes, indeed, RBMK is a very "close relative" of production reactors, but it is an energy reactor and is not suitable for the production of plutonium.

    plutonium is produced in any type of reactor. in fact, this process even has a name - the reproduction rate of nuclear fuel.
    1. NordOst16
      NordOst16 25 November 2017 09: 06 New
      0
      Indeed, it is developed during the operation of any uranium fuel reactor. And if plutonium is produced less than it is burned, then this, if my memory serves me right, is called not the multiplication coefficient, but the conversion coefficient. But only the quality of reactor-grade plutonium can be very different. High-purity plutonium 239 is produced in fast neutron reactors (about 95% Pu239, the rest of the plutonium isotopes 240 and 241). Thermal neutron reactors cannot boast of such purity, and the produced plutonium there consists of 60-70% of the 239 plutonium isotope and the rest is 240 and 241 isotopes, which is not very convenient for nuclear weapons, although it is quite suitable for loading into the reactor.
  5. Alex20042004
    Alex20042004 24 November 2017 21: 53 New
    0
    Ah, I liked it !:

    http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/5252468/post2847
    59670

    Anyway, well done Tarakashechka!
    _________________________________________________
    ______________

    Two tasks were written on the chalkboard, which I, as usual, took for homework. I immediately copied them into my notebook.
    A few days later, I came to Neumann and asked him for forgiveness for the delay in completing homework, justifying myself by the complexity of the tasks. I asked him if I could still hand in my work. He casually suggested that I “throw” the decision on his desk.
    Neumann's desk was littered with papers, and I, realizing that my notebook was lost among hundreds of others, reluctantly laid it on one of the stacks of papers.
    One and a half months later on Sunday, at about eight o’clock in the morning, my wife Anna and I woke up from a knock at our front door. On the threshold stood agitated Neumann.
    Taking advantage of my confusion, Neumann burst into our house with an exclamation: “I just finished writing the preface to one of your works. Read it right now so that I can immediately send your work to publication. ”
    It took me a while to figure out what he meant. It turned out that the formulas written that day on the chalkboard, which I took for my homework and subsequently decided, were an example of well-known unsolvable statistical problems.
    Neumann had to repeat everything several times from beginning to end, so that I understood that the tasks I had solved were not just “the next task”. ”

    Draw conclusions: the doctrine, tasks and just the world around us should always be re-viewed for the first time. George Danzig was not limited to knowledge about the insolubility of the tasks depicted - he simply did not know that this was impossible.