Military Review

Russian A-100 will provide UAV control

49
The developers of the A-100 radar patrol aircraft that recently performed the first flight were tasked with providing control of unmanned aerial vehicles, reports Interfax message of the newspaper "Red Star".


Russian A-100 will provide UAV control


New multifunctional aviation the complex has the ability not only to receive and process information about a larger number of targets at a greater range. The developers were tasked with providing control of unmanned aerial vehicles from the A-100,
writes a newspaper.

It is also reported that the new complex should "not only work on air and ground targets, but also to ensure the implementation of more complex tasks in the field of aerospace defense."

Sat Saturday A-100 made its first flight. He took off from the airfield Taganrog Aviation Scientific-Technical Complex named. Gm Beriev.

Aircraft equipment is capable of “rapidly increasing the radar field in a given operational direction, detecting and tracking aerial and other targets, as well as participating in the management of fighter and attack aircraft when aiming at air, ground and sea targets”.

The new A-100 complex is equipped with a new generation system, made on the basis of the most modern technologies and element base. “This applies to both the means of obtaining information and the computer system for processing it, as well as automated workstations for operators,” the article says.

All radio equipment created by concern Vega (includes Rostec). A broad cooperation of domestic industry enterprises with the support of leading scientific centers of the Russian Academy of Sciences is participating in the project.

A planned modernization of radio-electronic complexes already in service with the RF Aerospace System of the Russian Federation, in particular, A-50, is being upgraded to the A-50 level.
Photos used:
press service of the concern "Vega" / TASS
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. pavelty
    pavelty 20 November 2017 10: 25
    +2
    Finally, Vega gave birth to this mushroom, how long ...
    1. 210ox
      210ox 20 November 2017 10: 30
      +3
      Well, these are all the consequences of the collapse of the USSR .. Unfortunately, our industry is slowly recovering.
      Quote: pavlentiy
      Finally, Vega gave birth to this mushroom, how long ...
    2. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 20 November 2017 10: 40
      +2
      "Strong bold, like the White Swan - I stand on the wing,"
      (from the song by Mikhalchik Julia "White Swan" .. lyrics by Korotnikov)
      1. Vladimir16
        Vladimir16 20 November 2017 10: 57
        +2
        Quote: To be or not to be
        Strong, bold, like the White Swan ..

        You have a feminine swan. Bird bugger. Judging by the text, the young lady's color is white. She compares this color with the color of a swan.
        This is really just text. This cannot be called poetry. It is rather nonsense, in the truest sense of the word.
        And the plane is still gray-green. I don’t know what color he will end up with. And it doesn't matter at all.
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 20 November 2017 12: 34
          +3
          Quote: Vladimir16
          Bird bugger. Judging by the text, the young lady's color is white. She compares this color with the color of a swan.

          Quote: Vladimir16
          And the plane is still gray-green. I don’t know what color he will end up with.

          And if, in the end, the color of the plane is really white, like the color of a swan, will you take your words back?
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 20 November 2017 14: 32
          +1
          Quote: Vladimir16
          You have a feminine swan. Bird bugger.

          It turns out that swans have no females. And then camels are fagots too, and dragonflies are lesbians.
        3. michey
          michey 20 November 2017 15: 29
          0
          Common enamel color for aluminum alloys. Then paint on top in the coloring of the airline or the Air Force.
  2. Vitas
    Vitas 20 November 2017 10: 26
    0
    So let him fly along the borders of Ukraine ... check the operation of all systems.
  3. san4es
    san4es 20 November 2017 10: 29
    +4
    Russian A-100 will provide UAV control

    ... Where to get them recourse... Can squeeze out the Chinese? bully
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 20 November 2017 10: 37
      +5
      Quote: san4es
      Where to get them

      What kind of pessimism, Sasha? I understand that Russia has not so much a UAV as the United States. But they are!
      1. san4es
        san4es 20 November 2017 10: 41
        +3
        Quote: Jedi
        ... What kind of pessimism, Sasha?

        ... Can't wait stop
        But they are!

        ... I believe yes
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 20 November 2017 10: 45
          +2
          That's much better. good
      2. askort154
        askort154 20 November 2017 11: 12
        +4
        Jedi ....What kind of pessimism, Sasha? I understand that Russia has not so much a UAV as the United States. But they are!

        Of course, when the USA, Israel, China were closely engaged in UAVs, we had no time for them. We survived and tried to keep at least some defense capability of the country. Now hands have reached the UAV.
        There are already a lot of lungs and they are honing their "skills" in Syria.
        Drums are being actively developed.
        - "Fregat" - 7t,
        - "Breakthrough" - 10 tons,
        - "Hunter" - 20 t.
        Altair - 5t, in 2016 performed a series of successful flights in Kazan, confirming the calculated data:
        T floor. - up to 2 days, without refueling.
        H floor. = 12 km.,
        L floor. = 10 thousand km.,
        Payload = 2 tons.
        Dimensions: 30 m. (Span) 12 m. (Length).
        Serial production is planned for 2018.
        Head up, friends! yes
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 20 November 2017 11: 14
          +3
          Thanks for the positive information! drinks
      3. I doubt it
        I doubt it 20 November 2017 12: 38
        +1
        Quote: Jedi
        Quote: san4es
        Where to get them

        ... Russia is not so much a UAV as the United States. But they are!

        Yeah ...
        "Orlan-10"
  4. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 20 November 2017 10: 39
    +2
    "The Russian A-100 will provide control of drones ..." Provide it, maybe it will provide ... only if it will always be expedient? And will it always be possible? There will not be many A-100 devices, and there can be a lot of drones! In short .... nadot and other command posts control drones (and air too ...). For example, based on Mi-26, respectively upgraded ...
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 20 November 2017 12: 49
      +4
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      There will not be many A-100 devices available, and there may be a lot of drones! In short .... there are other drone command posts (and aerial ones too ...). For example, based on the Mi-26

      Based on the IL-114 under construction. Let not with a powerful antenna (Affar on the sides), but it will be the most economical option.
      1. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 20 November 2017 12: 55
        +1
        And this option is not excluded ....
      2. andrewkor
        andrewkor 20 November 2017 12: 59
        +2
        It was already manufactured in Tashkent and flew the Il-114LL, created specifically for testing the options for electronic warfare, avionics, etc.
        1. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 20 November 2017 13: 54
          +1
          Actually ...... where is Tashkent, and where is Moscow ..... what although, a reason for optimism can be found here ... The main thing is to start (!), as one famous person used to say ... wink
          1. michey
            michey 20 November 2017 15: 30
            0
            And where is Tashkent and where is Moscow? 0109 "LL" is operated not by Tashkent, but by Moscow.
            1. Nikolaevich I
              Nikolaevich I 20 November 2017 16: 05
              +1
              "And ..."? Yes, besides .... are you running a thing?
              1. michey
                michey 20 November 2017 16: 50
                0
                How many then ordered the MO, so much and built
          2. andrewkor
            andrewkor 20 November 2017 18: 20
            +1
            So after all, Ilyushin has all the documentation for all products, TAPOiCH is only a serial plant. The Il-114 is not such a large-scale aircraft as others, you can pick up a plant and give the Russians a job!
            1. michey
              michey 20 November 2017 21: 15
              0
              Are you aware of salaries at aircraft factories in the Russian Federation? They are not the highest, so to speak, and there is no mad crush at the checkpoint))
            2. Nikolaevich I
              Nikolaevich I 20 November 2017 23: 48
              +1
              Quote: andrewkor
              So after all, all the documentation for all products from Ilyushin, a plant can be picked up and give the Russians the same job!

              This is a completely different matter!
      3. michey
        michey 20 November 2017 15: 29
        0
        "Under construction"? How many "built", can you tell?)))
    2. okko077
      okko077 20 November 2017 13: 38
      +3
      The developers were tasked with providing control of unmanned aerial vehicles from the A-100,
      Once again, the idea of ​​a complete misunderstanding in the Ministry of Defense is confirmed, by the author of the article and on the forum about the role of UAVs ... UAVs are launched not in order to control them, but so that they themselves control the weapons that are part of the systems where the UAVs act as sensors information and target designation in real time. These systems are created and operate on an ongoing basis and conduct modern combat operations, and do not wait for the A-100 to take off ... Is that clear to everyone? To do this, you need to create Combat Information Systems ... We do not have them ... We do not even have a concept about these network-centric systems and the concept of their creation and use ... Thank you, degenerates from the General Staff !!! Are these donkeys going to fly a UAV with the A-100? Who set the task? How long will this stupidity flourish in the highest circles of the MO? When will we hear intelligible speeches from these out-of-the-mind old boys?
  5. vlad007
    vlad007 20 November 2017 11: 44
    0
    They do not write anything about the capabilities of A-100 to detect "invisible" aircraft, and this is the most interesting. This topic is generally very muddy - some write that "invisibility" is invisible only to airborne radars of planes, and only in frontal projection, while ground-based radars see them, others write that ground-based radars do not see them, then what is the A-100 airplane chip .
    1. okko077
      okko077 20 November 2017 15: 04
      0
      And the trick is that this A-100 is not needed ... It is possible to control the positional areas on the border of our country from ground stations ... We do not conduct conquest wars with the destruction of the aviation of semi-developed countries like pi_ndos ... In a war with the latter is an excellent target and that's all ... Yes, and one SU-57 can replace this colossus ... The idea that it will replace stationary destroyed ones does not deserve attention ... This is a simple cut of the dough ...
      1. michey
        michey 20 November 2017 15: 31
        +2
        Of course of course. And the A-50 is not needed))) Yeah))) they were built)))
        1. okko077
          okko077 20 November 2017 15: 37
          0
          What do we need? How have they been successfully applied in Syria? Except for the tale that the US coalition planes immediately scattered, nothing else could be invented ... Is this all the invaluable experience of using a very necessary and useful aircraft? ... And I forgot that everything has experience and significance, but we do not know that! !! ... Like our TU-214R. He also sees everything and knows everything, only he does not transmit this information anywhere and does not control anything ... And the information is used after his landing ... Another useless masterpiece ... The most unique and unparalleled in the world and in the universe.
          1. michey
            michey 20 November 2017 16: 53
            +1
            A-50 should aim at the target and coordinate the actions of attack aircraft. Have there been conflicts with countries requiring its use? ICBMs have not used them either?
            1. okko077
              okko077 20 November 2017 17: 01
              0
              You are not very picky about terminology. Attack aircraft works on the ground. And the A-50 controls more fighters, providing cover for the positional area from the air, where there are no ground-based radars and that's it ... We don't have such groups, even in Syria there is air defense with its own means ... And the ICBM provides us with peace and existence ... But if you cut the A-50, nothing will change ...
              1. Salx
                Salx 20 November 2017 18: 04
                +1
                How stupid the Americans are, since they have built so many avacs ... and most importantly they use them ... here are stupid (isn't that smart guy?)
                1. okko077
                  okko077 20 November 2017 19: 22
                  0
                  I'm not smart, you are not modifying it. Everything is superficial, but we must think .. the Americans are waging wars of conquest, they need to cover their ground and air groupings on the territory of foreign countries, where they do not want to build anything and after the plunder they will leave ... They need AWACS aircraft, and we do not have much we will not have avionics and will not soon ...
                  1. michey
                    michey 20 November 2017 21: 16
                    +1
                    And who will give target designation to cruise missiles, tell us? or we will not have missile cruisers either?)))
  6. Zomanus
    Zomanus 20 November 2017 12: 17
    0
    Well, at least they found out that the plane can take off with that equipment,
    which is installed in it.
    And now the fun begins - setting up equipment in real conditions.
  7. I doubt it
    I doubt it 20 November 2017 12: 46
    0
    "Russian A-100 will provide control of drones"

    Yes, yes, in twenty years ...
    When will these same drones appear?
    And when, finally, this A-100 will be brought to serviceability.
    And he will replenish our Air Force. In the amount of ONE piece!
  8. andrewkor
    andrewkor 20 November 2017 12: 54
    0
    Eh ma! As soon as I see the 76th not painted, so sadness takes on TAPOiCH, every day they flew over Kadyshev for test flights, and then for painting and already for delivery to the customer!
  9. komvap
    komvap 20 November 2017 14: 56
    +1
    AWACS aircraft must be unmanned.

    High radiation - in the manned version leads to an increase in the mass of the protection, or to restrictions on the radiation level.
    Low requirements for aerobatics - the flight takes place without sharp maneuvering.
    Dramatic reduction in excess weight:
    - the ability to increase the radiation power,
    - or several times to reduce the mass and type of the device while maintaining the radiation level

    At the current, and even more so in the future, level of electronics will sharply reduce the cost of devices.
    1. komvap
      komvap 20 November 2017 18: 11
      +1
      since the drone AWACS does not require high speed
      then you can use the biplane scheme and (or)
      unusual layouts such as a wing-bearing body where the overall antenna is located.
      1. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 20 November 2017 23: 58
        +1
        Quote: komvap
        use biplane circuit

        Better "catamaran"!
    2. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 20 November 2017 23: 56
      +1
      Quote: komvap
      AWACS must be unmanned ...................................

      It’s clear! Take a companion for your Wishlist! good
      1. komvap
        komvap 21 November 2017 00: 08
        +1
        .. omitting your childish sarcasm ..
        What such features of an AWACS aircraft do not allow it to be a drone, unlike an unmanned reconnaissance aircraft?
        1. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 21 November 2017 01: 14
          +1
          laughing lol "Children's"! At my age? Oh and made fun! Yes, and I do not mind the drone! Only here ..... to refuel, pre-flight maintenance ... take-off and landing .... channeling! I suggest "dilute the contents"! To unmanned airborne AWACS add unmanned airships AWACS and ..... satellites "radar"! Read .... an interesting thing! wink
          1. komvap
            komvap 21 November 2017 01: 30
            +1
            refuel? Is it easier to refuel a manned vehicle?
            What substances did you use there?
            I repeat the question -
            What features of the AWACS aircraft do not allow it to be unmanned unlike conventional and already massive unmanned reconnaissance aircraft?
            1. Nikolaevich I
              Nikolaevich I 21 November 2017 01: 37
              +1
              Quote: komvap
              is it easier to refuel a manned vehicle or what?

              For the "especially gifted", I repeat ... With manned vehicles, this is a necessity ... if it is possible to make "drones" "long-playing", then this opportunity is better to use!
            2. Nikolaevich I
              Nikolaevich I 21 November 2017 02: 12
              +1
              Quote: komvap
              What features of the AWACS aircraft do not allow it to be unmanned unlike conventional and already massive unmanned reconnaissance aircraft?

              Those that do not currently allow the use of widely unmanned fighters, bombers. The technological level of "modern civilization" So far (!) Does not allow unmanned aircraft to displace manned ... (difficult to use!)