Military Review

Tu-22М3 BCC RF hit the IG facilities *

60
Six long-range bombers Tu-22M3 November 17, 2017 inflicted aviation a strike at ISIS * terrorist targets in Syria, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.


Tu-22М3 BCC RF hit the IG facilities *


Six Tu-22М3 long-range bombers that took off from an airfield in Russia, made a flight over Iran and Iraq, inflicted a group air strike on the ISIL terrorist group * in the area of ​​Abu Kemal (Deir ez-Zor province)
- said in a statement.

The targets for destruction were the strongholds of the bandit groups, the accumulation of militants and armored vehicles. The means of objective control recorded the defeat of all designated targets.

It is noted that the air cover of long-range bombers over the territory of Syria was carried out by Su-30CM fighters from the Khmeimim airfield.

After completing the combat mission, all Russian aircraft returned to their home airfields.

ISIS * (IG *) is a terrorist group banned in Russia
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 17 November 2017 18: 01 New
    +7
    Press the reptiles! Well done, our pilots! Over the past couple of weeks of flights for more than six months ..
    1. The_lancet
      The_lancet 17 November 2017 18: 23 New
      +7
      Six long-range Tu-22М3 17 November 2017 bombers struck an attack on ISIS * terrorists in Syria, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.

      With a frequency of 3-5 days in November, news regularly appears such as "The last stronghold of the Islamic State in Syria was taken." Constantly the same wording and expression.
      Is it just information garbage? The reason is the lack of really important events?
      Or is it a misrepresentation?
      1. Gale
        Gale 17 November 2017 18: 26 New
        +9
        so the MO cut off the last stronghold of IS in Syria a week ago, and they didn’t even start a full-fledged assault on Abu Kemal, Assad’s troops and Iraqi mercenaries were still marking the last stronghold, but haven’t decided to enter yet))
        1. Warrior-80
          Warrior-80 17 November 2017 21: 58 New
          +8
          You’re quick, the United States, when you entered Afghanistan and are still sitting on the bases afraid of showing their nose, half of the country is under the control of various groups. To take the city is one thing and to keep it without carrying out a full sweep is difficult and fraught with many casualties among personnel and civilians
        2. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 18 November 2017 03: 01 New
          +2
          Quote: GaLe
          so the MO cut off the last stronghold of IS in Syria a week ago, and they didn’t even start a full-fledged assault on Abu Kemal, Assad’s troops and Iraqi mercenaries were still marking the last stronghold, but haven’t decided to enter yet))

          do you think there is nothing else around Abu Kemal ???? wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
      2. user1212
        user1212 17 November 2017 18: 42 New
        +9
        Quote: The_Lancet
        With a frequency of 3-5 days in November, news regularly appears such as "The last stronghold of the Islamic State in Syria was taken." Constantly the same wording and expression.

        This is modern "journalism"
        Quote: The_Lancet
        Is this just information junk?

        Like 95% of modern "journalism"
        Quote: The_Lancet
        The reason is the lack of really important events?

        Important events do not fit into the global mainstream. For example, harassment in Hollywood and Trump’s connection with the Kremlin are more pressing topics than the massacres of civilians during the capture of Mosul. The successes of the Libyan "democracy" as it is also not covered
      3. Muvka
        Muvka 17 November 2017 18: 43 New
        +5
        Quote: The_Lancet
        Six long-range Tu-22М3 17 November 2017 bombers struck an attack on ISIS * terrorists in Syria, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.

        With a frequency of 3-5 days in November, news regularly appears such as "The last stronghold of the Islamic State in Syria was taken." Constantly the same wording and expression.
        Is it just information garbage? The reason is the lack of really important events?
        Or is it a misrepresentation?

        Can you throw 4 news this month? Very interesting. To make the dates different.
      4. hrych
        hrych 17 November 2017 20: 10 New
        +4
        Quote: The_Lancet
        Or is it a misrepresentation?

        Well, finally you began to understand wassat Now the media is used by our General Staff for the information war and the reaction of the US government in the form of malice to our media is certainly justified. There is poker and you won’t understand where is the bluff, etc. Your players snickered and started to mess. And the VKS type attacks were opened wassat After the panic of the Daishaks, the confusion of the Americans and the sorrows of the Israelis sad
        1. Warrior-80
          Warrior-80 17 November 2017 22: 12 New
          +2
          Well, I think it’s not quite a bluff here, it was called an unstable front in World War II, during the day the sar drove into the city under the guise of equipment and air strikes, drove to the outskirts of the city leaving behind large forces of terrorists and reported the city was taken, but by night it was necessary to retreat they didn’t burn all the equipment and do not incur large losses
      5. Rurikovich
        Rurikovich 17 November 2017 20: 48 New
        +8
        Quote: The_Lancet
        Or is it a misrepresentation?

        Well, about the "misleading" of Americans, no one has yet surpassed! laughing

        wink hi
        1. Nick
          Nick 17 November 2017 23: 25 New
          +3
          Quote: Rurikovich
          Quote: The_Lancet
          Or is it a misrepresentation?

          Well, about the "misleading" of Americans, no one has yet surpassed! laughing

          wink hi

          good
      6. Dead duck
        Dead duck 17 November 2017 21: 40 New
        +4
        Quote: The_Lancet
        regular news such as "The last IS stronghold in Syria was taken

        every stronghold is important if it is an enemy ... winked
        Quote: The_Lancet
        Or is it a misrepresentation?

        just let the fog ... let the enemies break their heads. yes
      7. kenig1
        kenig1 17 November 2017 21: 55 New
        +3
        Where in the article is written about the last bastion? Wake up you defecate.
      8. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 17 November 2017 22: 51 New
        +1
        Quote: The_Lancet
        With a frequency of 3-5 days in November, news of the type "The last stronghold of the IS was taken

        Take a pencil in your hands and carefully re-read the article, underline the word "OPLOT".
        Quote: The_Lancet
        Is it just information garbage? The reason is the lack of really important events?

        No, this is a presentation of the fact that "strongholds of gangs, a cluster of militants and armored vehicles", which your "geniuses" did not manage to repaint in moderate opposition, are being destroyed.
        Quote: The_Lancet
        Or is it a misrepresentation?

        But why mislead you then? Take it as a fact - whoever didn’t hide is not our fault. Subjectively flopped, as a matter of fact, and reported, without concealment and other embellishments.
    2. GPU-M
      GPU-M 17 November 2017 18: 29 New
      +5
      Quote: 210ox
      Over the last couple of weeks of departures for more than six months ..

      Looks like some kind of agreement ... The West is silent, about the "Russian atrocities" and the chemical attacks of Asaad in Syria!
      It seems that our special services seized the archives of devils and we hinted to the West if they would interfere with us .. God grant that it was so ..!
  2. Going
    Going 17 November 2017 18: 02 New
    10
    After completing the combat mission, all Russian aircraft returned to their home airfields.


    This is the main goal.
    1. 79807420129
      79807420129 17 November 2017 18: 06 New
      14
      Quote: Going
      This is the main goal.

      Victor, hi The main goal is the Pentagon. hi
      1. Going
        Going 17 November 2017 18: 13 New
        +9
        Vlad hi Well, yes, and everyone returned to the base.
  3. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 17 November 2017 18: 05 New
    +3
    The peasants need to work out more of such a combat use. This is not to naughty at the training ground.
    1. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 17 November 2017 18: 29 New
      +1
      In Crimea, you need a couple of regiments of Tu-22M3. It’s good for the country, the pilots in Crimea will live, and any byak - evil spells will subside!
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 17 November 2017 19: 38 New
        +1
        Quote: 30 vis
        In Crimea, you need a couple of regiments of Tu-22M3

        And the fig? They, that, for example, from Soltsy, will not be reached if they get from Mozdok to Syria.?
        1. Xnumx vis
          Xnumx vis 17 November 2017 20: 06 New
          +1
          The whole of Europe and the Mediterranean Sea under the wing ... Tactical range, km 2200
      2. Lucy
        Lucy 18 November 2017 00: 14 New
        0
        Are you not Manilov from Raspberryism?
    2. Gale
      Gale 17 November 2017 18: 31 New
      +1
      and what is the fundamental difference? as for me the same thing, no opposition, you just bomb the Papuans who can’t do anything a priori)
      1. Alexander 3
        Alexander 3 17 November 2017 18: 50 New
        +1
        But how do they become snipers? Not in the dash.
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 17 November 2017 20: 38 New
        +2
        Quote: GaLe
        and what is the fundamental difference? as for me the same thing, no opposition, you just bomb the Papuans who can’t do anything a priori)

        Well, if it makes no difference to you whether to bombard the barmalei or the wooden mock-ups at the training ground, then there is nothing to talk about.
      3. Mih1974
        Mih1974 18 November 2017 05: 15 New
        +1
        These “nothing-doing Papuans” have already shot down the Su-24 (and you don’t have to dabble that these are Turks), so the video clearly shows that the “drying” of the cover is armed with a blindfold so that all sorts of “unknown Igilov fighters” could control themselves.
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic 17 November 2017 18: 08 New
    +2
    To be honest, it was necessary to conclude an agreement with Iran or Jordan on the temporary location of our aircraft at one of their military airfields, so as not to drive a full aircraft for a third!
    1. Kurare
      Kurare 17 November 2017 18: 21 New
      +8
      Quote: Herkulesich
      ... so as not to drive full planes a third!

      ... or send Americans far away with an agreement to remove air refueling systems from all Tu-22s and then it will not be necessary to fly underloaded.
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 17 November 2017 18: 33 New
        +4
        Quote: Herkulesich
        To be honest, it was necessary to conclude an agreement with Iran or Jordan on the temporary location of our aircraft at one of their military airfields, so as not to drive a full aircraft for a third!

        We have already concluded a take-off and landing agreement in Iran. But alas, not every country can give a damn about American sanction pressure. The Yankees immediately pinched Iran and we were told goodbye. Daredevils in this world, against the USA there is no one but our country
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 18 November 2017 14: 14 New
        +1
        Quote: Kurare
        ... or send Americans far away with an agreement to remove air refueling systems from all Tu-22s and then it will not be necessary to fly underloaded.

        I am not special on the Tu-22-M3 (I served the Tu-26/95 for 142 years), but those who once served on them said that the entire refueling system in the air remained on them. Only the refueling rods that were stored in warehouses were removed, and returning them to their place is a matter of several hours. Who is in the know, let them write in more detail. True, air refueling skills for pilots will have to be restored. And it takes time.
        1. Kurare
          Kurare 18 November 2017 22: 59 New
          +2
          Quote: Piramidon
          ... the whole air refueling system remained on them. Only the refueling rods that were stored in warehouses were removed, and returning them to their place is a matter of several hours.

          As far as I heard, according to the contract that I signed "tagged," the entire refueling system was dismantled. The contract, by the way, was completely one-sided: we cleaned up the refueling system, the Americans clapped our hands together! Whether it was destroyed or stored somewhere in warehouses - I do not know. But, in order to install it again, you will have to dig decent and, importantly, violate the signed contract.

          I would like that with the modernization in the Tu-22M3M this disgrace was fixed!
    2. NN52
      NN52 17 November 2017 21: 57 New
      +8
      Of course you could .... Only pay them for basing, fuel, delivery of weapons there ...
      The result is the content of miniHmeinin ....
    3. Mih1974
      Mih1974 18 November 2017 05: 16 New
      +1
      Iran is categorically against foreign bases, and therefore was boiling when ours used one of their bases as a base jump. sad
  5. Politruk-M
    Politruk-M 17 November 2017 18: 09 New
    +3
    Only destroy and no negotiations ..
  6. andrewkor
    andrewkor 17 November 2017 18: 10 New
    +1
    They paved the way to Syria, and Iran then helps world evil imperialism and Zionism!
  7. svp67
    svp67 17 November 2017 18: 13 New
    +2
    Well done. But why are the Tu-95 "cool"? Their contribution to the “cast-iron roll” may be more substantial.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 17 November 2017 18: 42 New
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      But why are the Tu-95 "cool"? Their contribution to the “cast-iron roll” may be more substantial.

      Yes, if they are sent along the same route as the Tu-22M3. But for some reason they have a roundabout route., Over neutral waters, through Gibraltar. This is 2-3 times you can bomb one 22 carcass
      1. SOF
        SOF 17 November 2017 20: 10 New
        +2
        . But for some reason they have a workaround.

        Watson is elementary, because initially, their primary task is beyond the North Pole. This means that it is impossible to base it lower than the average band, due to the increase in the time of missile approach to the main points on the carcass of the hegemonic state.
    2. Piramidon
      Piramidon 17 November 2017 20: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      But why are the Tu-95 "cool"?

      Not all of us can know on our sofas. Even such a chip, as the resource of the NK-12 engines or the AV-60 propellers, can have a meaning in this. No need to think that it is unlimited and you can fly forever.
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 18 November 2017 01: 39 New
        +1
        Quote: svp67
        But why are the Tu-95 "cool"? Their contribution to the “cast-iron roll” may be more substantial.

        Strategic missile carriers and they don’t even have sights for free-falling bombs. And it’s excessive to shoot X-101 missiles (.. 2) in Syria, because they are intended for completely different purposes. In Syria, of course, they attacked barmales, but this was most likely a military demonstration and a unique development of the combat use of the complex. Although if a critical situation develops there, they can work out again even with larger forces with great damage for the enemy (thanks to the accuracy of the missiles). But so far in Syria they are holding back or crushing the enemy: by tactical aircraft or by the "cast-iron" with the Tu-22M3
  8. SPACE
    SPACE 17 November 2017 18: 17 New
    0
    Six long-range bombers Tu-22M3

    They would re-equip one Ruslan under a bomber and place it in Xxx Mmm hey.oz. the air base in Syria ...
    1. GPU-M
      GPU-M 17 November 2017 18: 35 New
      +4
      Quote: SPACE
      Six long-range bombers Tu-22M3

      They would re-equip one Ruslan under a bomber and place it in Xxx Mmm hey.oz. the air base in Syria ...

      It’s possible, of course, but Russia especially conducts “combat experience” for our young pilots .. And the main thing is that our designers and engineers monitor and correct all the flaws in military equipment ..
      This is not a training exercise over Russia!
      This experience of Russia is very necessary in the future!
      "And experience, the son of the mistakes of hard work and the genius of enlightenment spirit .."
    2. Alexander 3
      Alexander 3 17 November 2017 18: 43 New
      +2
      Ours need more military applications, because Ruslan will not get you where you need to. We do not need carpet bombing. This is what the coalition is doing. Ours need accuracy. Yes, and the funds allocated to maintain combat readiness should be implemented efficiently.
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 17 November 2017 19: 42 New
      0
      Quote: SPACE
      They would re-equip one Ruslan under a bomber and place it in Xxx Mmm hey.oz. the air base in Syria ...

      Dreaming is not harmful. And if you equip all passenger airplanes with suspension systems for missiles and bombs and all fishing schooners with launchers for "calibers" ...
    4. Mih1974
      Mih1974 18 November 2017 05: 18 New
      +1
      In "Ruslan" our load "navel of all the bombs", but until it comes to him, or modest, or something else. lol
    5. Grits
      Grits 18 November 2017 05: 23 New
      +1
      They would re-equip one Ruslan under a bomber and place it in Xxx Mmm hey.oz. the air base in Syria ...
      A good idea. And load it with gravel from the quarries closest to the airfield. Upon arrival at the place of bombardment, a mini-bulldozer from the womb will bluntly rake the planes and dump several dozens of tons of heavy cobblestones buried by such tactics on the heads.
  9. pvv113
    pvv113 17 November 2017 18: 31 New
    +2
    Six long-range bombers Tu-22M3

    1. Politruk-M
      Politruk-M 17 November 2017 21: 36 New
      0
      How is our soul warms in Russia ..! Putin understood. Where is the key to souls in Russia!
    2. Mih1974
      Mih1974 18 November 2017 05: 20 New
      +1
      [media = https: //ok.ru/video/297424325337]
      good Strategic Missile Forces "we are not light and warm in every American home" good bully
  10. demo
    demo 17 November 2017 19: 08 New
    +2
    Already somehow sounds ordinary.
    They took off, hit, returned.
    And you need to add colors.
    It is impossible in the people to turn ACTION into action.
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 17 November 2017 19: 48 New
      0
      Quote: demo
      Already somehow sounds ordinary.
      They took off, hit, returned.
      And you need to add colors.
      It is impossible in the people to turn ACTION into action.

      What exactly do you need to see?
  11. alexhol
    alexhol 17 November 2017 20: 01 New
    +2
    Duty news with a duty photo and with duty comments.
  12. Evgenijus
    Evgenijus 17 November 2017 20: 02 New
    0
    Well, if the crews of the bombers change, and if all the time the same ones fly on a combat mission, then who is it good for? Or orders and medals cast a little?
  13. The comment was deleted.
    1. eplewke
      eplewke 17 November 2017 23: 43 New
      +4
      When asked by those who say that for beauty and aesthetics, we drive TUSHKAS with 6 fabs on board, I say: the Syrian express does not always have time to deliver ammunition on time, the intensity of the sorties is such that it is prohibitively expensive to throw so many bombs on orc heads. Why only 6 fab 500, because the ideal amount for the task and return to the airfield, taking into account fuel consumption, plus a small margin for emergency situations. Consider the specifics of the Syrian desert war: this is long-distance contact combat on average from 3000 to 5000 meters between the sides, there are few shelters, one fortified height with an anti-aircraft machine gun holds a huge location at gunpoint, believe that there are no daredevils to go to the right meat for seven years of the war, maybe besides our PMCs. Orcs like rats hide in fortifications, holes, as they hear the sound of an approaching plane, the fab 250 on the 24th and 25th do not always cope with their task, therefore it is very difficult for infantry on earth to take such elevation points. Here and the Ministry of Defense and remembered about the carcass. 15 tons of waste will leveled any fortified point with the ground, if anyone survives underground, it will surely be out of it for a long time, the infantry will be clearing the entrance. Now the conclusion: if the warriors occasionally drive the Tu-22m3 with blanks on board, then this is not from the fact that we are wiping shit with money, but from the fact that it has become effective and this situation requires. I have everything, thank you for your attention.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 18 November 2017 01: 56 New
        0
        ISIS clings to cities, or rather small towns. In street battles, the army is afraid to get involved. These towns are ironed with bombs over and over again. There, special accuracy is not needed.
  14. Lucy
    Lucy 18 November 2017 00: 10 New
    0
    Hooray patriots of the VO site began to clean up the comments.
    So the sofa will run away.
    Went to YouTube.
  15. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 18 November 2017 00: 34 New
    0
    Quote: lusya
    Hooray patriots of the VO site began to clean up the comments.
    So the sofa will run away.
    Went to YouTube.

    Or maybe you better go to the bath? wink
  16. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 18 November 2017 12: 20 New
    +1
    6 Tu-22М3 dropped on 6 KAB-1500LD-OD where BB on 650 kg. = 23,5 tons
    90 m. From the epicenter - the complete destruction of even the most fortified structures.
    170 m. From the epicenter - the complete destruction of unreinforced structures and almost complete, reinforced concrete structures.
    300 m. From the epicenter - the almost complete destruction of residential buildings. Reinforced structures are partially destroyed.
    440 m from the epicenter - partial destruction of unfortified structures.
    1120 m. From the epicenter - a shock wave breaks the glass.
    2290 m. From the epicenter - the shock wave is able to knock a person down.
  17. Lucy
    Lucy 18 November 2017 20: 50 New
    0
    [quote = Vlad5307] [quote = lusya] Hooray-patriots of the VO site began to clean up the comments.
    So the sofa will run away.
    Went to YouTube. [/ Quote]
    Or maybe you better go to the bath? wink[/ Q
    You can and in the bath.
    And you then the attendant ( my father is a native of Sumy region (1908), fought in 1941-1945. In Ukraine, in the Kherson region and in Kharkov relatives on his line[b] [/ b].) how it got here.
    Near the Tu-22M3 stood nearby?