Military Review

MiG-35 will get a long-range weapon

27
MiG-35 fighters will receive new aviation long range weapons. The official representative of the MiG corporation Anastasia Kravchenko announced this at the Dubai Airshow-2017 air show.


Kravchenko clarified that prospective aviation weapons, including long-range ones, will be introduced into the MiG-35 armament, allowing them to attack targets without entering the air defense zones. It is also expected that an expanded nomenclature of armaments will be applied in the new aviation complex, which will include a whole range of new types of guided aviation weapons of the air-to-surface and air-to-air classes.

MiG-35 will get a long-range weapon


Tests have already taken place, including the new detection and early warning system of the MiG-35, consisting of the OLS, AFAR, BRLS and others. It was possible to work out more than fifty different modes, to test the entire range of weapons, including guided and unguided missiles of the air-to-air and air-to-surface classes with various aiming systems. And on the MiG-35 as part of the air-to-surface weapons, systems were introduced for the first time, allowing them to attack on targets highlighted by a new-generation on-board illuminator laser from optical-electronic systems or on targets highlighted by an external ground or airborne illuminator, TASS reports
Photos used:
MiG Corporation
27 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 14 November 2017 11: 43 New
    +3
    All this pleases, it is necessary to implement this equipment. Of course, at such a missile launch range, only external illumination will help to achieve accuracy. Our scouts are skilled.
    1. Puss in Boots
      Puss in Boots 14 November 2017 11: 46 New
      +1
      And why didn’t you like drones for backlighting? drinks
      1. Alexander 3
        Alexander 3 14 November 2017 12: 08 New
        0
        A drone is the same scout.
    2. Scoun
      Scoun 14 November 2017 12: 18 New
      +4
      Quote: Alexander 3
      All this pleases, it is necessary to implement this equipment. Of course, at such a missile launch range, only external illumination will help to achieve accuracy.

      Well, here’s how to say))) There is no MiG-35 and there is a rocket and KRET is what else says -
      Sorry that I posted everything, but I highlighted it in bold text to the plane, and maybe someone will be interested.


      Search

      17 September 2016
      The first stage of the study in the framework of the ROCAR ROFAR is completed
      KRET successfully completed the first stage of research on the ROCAR ROC. As a result, the fundamental attainability of the project goals was confirmed.
      The Radioelectronic Technologies Concern completed the development and manufacture of a test bench for the study and measurement of the characteristics of the radio photon element base, radio photon devices and transmit-receive modules (PPM) and the creation of a mock-up of radio-photon devices ROFAR. The ROFAR project is planned to be completed in 2019 after five stages of development work.

      The mock-up of the radiofoton transmitting path (PPM) ROFAR is completely built on the domestic key radiophotonic elements developed during the stage. The layout demonstrates the practical implementation of the principle of photon generation with modulation by an RF signal, as well as effective photovoltaic detection, followed by transmission of powerful nanosecond pulses over a radio path in a wide range of repetition frequencies.

      The use of radio-phased phased array antennas (ROFAR) on the ship will reduce the overall dimensions of electronic equipment by 5-7 times. Radio-phased phased array antennas will significantly expand the capabilities of modern communications and radars - their resolution will increase tenfold. If a modern locator has a radiation frequency of 10 GHz, 3 cm with a spectrum width of 1-2 GHz, then in ROFAR this frequency can be from 1 Hz to 100 GHz at the same time. In practice, this means that ROFAR can provide a detailed, three-dimensional image of what is happening at a distance of hundreds of kilometers from it. For example, at a distance of 400 km, you can not just see a person, but recognize his face.
      The carriers of this technology will be naval platforms, in particular radar stations of ships. In the future, ROFAR technology will be used on submarines of the latest projects.
      The ultra-wide bandwidth of the ROFAR signal makes it possible to obtain an almost television image in the radar range. The technology of radio photonics, in particular, should open up new opportunities for improving the “smart skin” on Russian helicopters and aircraft of the latest generation.

      According to the adviser to the first deputy general director of KRET V.G. Mikheev, ROFAR will allow us to see a plane 500 kilometers away, as if we were standing 50 meters from it at the airport, his portrait in the video range. Moreover, if necessary, this technology will allow you to look into the plane itself, to find out what people and equipment are in it, since the signal can go through any obstacles, even meter-long lead walls.
      http://kret.com/media/news/zavershen-pervyy-etap-
      issledovaniya-v-ramkakh-okr-rofar /

      It follows that the MiG-35 is pushed purely for export, where the MiG will be able to more than adequately fight the F15 / 16/18, and if our planes receive the ROFAR filling, then the already stamped F-22s and 35s will seriously lag behind our planes both in time and for money, for modernization / integration, etc. Of course this is my chaotic IMHA. hi
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 14 November 2017 13: 17 New
        +3
        For this, our aviation weapons are lagging behind, most of what is now in the arsenal of the Soviet Air Force.
        1. Vladimir16
          Vladimir16 14 November 2017 15: 21 New
          +2
          So we have a large part of the population of Soviet "production". And this is normal. Life goes on. And there is no need to chew.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 14 November 2017 15: 37 New
            +2
            A person has a "shelf life" much more than rockets and bombs; there will be no modern weapons and you will lose the war.
          2. Eflintuk
            Eflintuk 14 November 2017 22: 53 New
            0
            In the USSR, too, life went on, and then bam! - and there is no country. The Kremlin regional committee does not learn anything.
        2. Alexander Borisov
          Alexander Borisov 14 November 2017 23: 06 New
          0
          What weapons? Russian missiles are superior to American, both air and ship.
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 14 November 2017 15: 45 New
        +5
        Quote: Scoun
        and if our planes get the ROFAR filling, then the already stamped F-22s and 35s will seriously lag behind our planes

        ROFAR will appear in the production version only by 20-21. Now he is undergoing bench tests. Apparently for this reason, for the SU-30/34/35 they do not develop AFAR, thinking of putting ROFARs on them immediately.
        1. dvina71
          dvina71 15 November 2017 13: 05 New
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          do not develop AFAR

          Well, the FARs are on the aircraft listed ..., .. I am not strong in the designs of radars ... but I was taught as a child - the most universal tool is worthless. So that a separated emitter and receiver is not a bad option.
  3. Simon
    Simon 14 November 2017 11: 48 New
    +3
    Kravchenko clarified that it is planned to introduce promising aviation weapons, including long-range ones, into the MiG-35's armament, which allow attacking targets without entering the air defense zones. In, fine! Without entering the enemy air defense’s work area, you can release a weapon and it will hit the target! good Here is another splinter for enemy air defense! Now they will again have a headache, how to deal with this "ailment". crying
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 14 November 2017 13: 26 New
      +1
      What they forgot to mention in the article is that Mig will be cheaper than Dryers. Although, with a lack of pilots, we really do not use it ... hi
      1. Alexander Borisov
        Alexander Borisov 14 November 2017 23: 09 New
        0
        Despite this, India does not want to buy MIG-35 and prefers the more expensive Rafals.
        1. maiman61
          maiman61 15 November 2017 13: 15 New
          0
          MIG-35 has not yet been adopted by the Russian Federation. It’s stupid to buy weapons that even the country of origin doesn’t accept for some reason!
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 14 November 2017 11: 57 New
    0
    illuminated by an external ground or air illuminator,

    ... an enemy tank rides for itself, an enemy airplane flies, and they have a red dot on board ... bully
  5. PROXOR
    PROXOR 14 November 2017 11: 58 New
    +3
    Not from the good life of the old man is completed on the 29th to the 4 ++ generation. They cannot make a single-engine light fighter; there is no powerful enough engine.
    1. Cxnumx
      Cxnumx 14 November 2017 12: 11 New
      0
      Quote: PROXOR
      They cannot make a single-engine light fighter; there is no powerful enough engine.

      what for? save fuel? there are no problems with this in our country. Well, it’s more noticeable on Amerikosov’s radars than with one nozzle (probably). on ours somehow the same.
      1. PROXOR
        PROXOR 15 November 2017 11: 05 New
        0
        Two engines are the extra weight and size of the aircraft. More fuel is needed with you.
        1. Cxnumx
          Cxnumx 15 November 2017 12: 21 New
          0
          Quote: PROXOR
          Two engines are the extra weight and size of the aircraft. More fuel is needed with you.

          not an engineer, but, in my opinion, there is still not a direct relationship. those. not twice as heavy / more eating / larger sizes / well and more powerful, not 2 times. but more tenacious + maneuverable. hbz that our pilots prefer. Yes, and what was there in the TK for the project - also hbz, maybe just 2 and wanted to.
          1. PROXOR
            PROXOR 16 November 2017 12: 12 New
            0
            I'm afraid this whole story doesn't look right. When the question arose of the front-line zone fighter, as opposed to the F-16. It turned out that upgrading the MIG-23 is already useless. He was at the limit and inferior to the F-16 in all parameters except the price. They started developing a new aircraft, and when they estimated the weight of the combat load, as well as all the equipment, so that the new MIG would successfully fight the same F-16, they realized that there was no engine for a single installation. They made a Solomon decision, put two of them.
            1. Cxnumx
              Cxnumx 16 November 2017 13: 37 New
              +1
              even if the decision was made only for this reason, something I'm not sure about the "advantage" of one engine over two ...
              in terms of thrust-weight ratio, the Mig-35 even the F-35 is not inferior
              Mig-35:
              Normal take-off weight - 17500 kg.
              The thrust-to-weight ratio at normal take-off mass is equal to 1,03.
              F-35A:
              The thrust-weight ratio with a normal take-off weight of 18300 kg is 1,06.
              1. PROXOR
                PROXOR 16 November 2017 15: 26 New
                0
                Yes ktozh argues.
    2. Alexander 3
      Alexander 3 14 November 2017 12: 11 New
      +2
      Many propelled aircraft have been designed for safety and survivability.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 14 November 2017 13: 18 New
        +2
        Only now they are most often broken.
        1. tomket
          tomket 15 November 2017 01: 51 New
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          Only now they are most often broken

          Did you just come up with it yourself?
  6. Shuttle
    Shuttle 15 November 2017 13: 15 New
    0
    I would like to know the specific tsifir. This would be the most interesting in this news.