Military Review

On the Aurora Shot: Do not give trump cards to Russophobes

123
A century has passed since the historic Aurora shot. Shot changed history not only Russia, but the whole world. No matter how anyone feels about this event, his epoch-making is not able to deny even the most ardent anti-Communists and the most notorious Russophobes.


On the Aurora Shot: Do not give trump cards to Russophobes


It is characteristic that anti-communism and russophobia too often go in the same team. The old “fighters against communism” in the West (especially in the USA) very quickly repainted into “fighters against the Russian threat”. Slogans have changed, but the essence has not changed. These forces do not want to see Russia strong, so the Soviet Union was hostile to them, so the independent actions of today's Moscow on the foreign policy arena are hostile to them.

The link between anti-communism and Russophobia in Ukraine can be seen most vividly, especially after the so-called “Euromaidan”. Of course, earlier there were acts of vandalism on the part of Ukrainian nationalists in relation to monuments to both Pushkin and Lenin. But today all this is already declared at the state level. A similar picture can be observed in the Baltic countries, as well as in Poland, where the law on the demolition of monuments to Soviet soldiers was recently passed.

There are, of course, in Russia many who, seemingly, loving their Homeland, in every way blackens the Great October Socialist Revolution. But the denial of this event, as well as the subsequent years of the Soviet era, is a voluntary or involuntary play into the hands of those who seek to see our country weak, dependent on someone else's will, unable to say its word in the world. As for appeals to liquidate Lenin’s Mausoleum and the necropolis on Red Square - oh, how happy Maidan horses and vandals will be! After all, this will be the actual recognition of their rightness ...

You can blame the Bolsheviks that they also demolished the monuments to the kings, blew up the churches, dekulakized middle peasants. Yes, a lot of what you can blame. However, all this was in the initial stages of the Revolution, when the mutual hatred of the “red” and “white” was especially fierce. It is unacceptable to talk about red terror, silent about white. It is inadmissible, using the excesses of the early period of Soviet power, to denigrate the entire socialist era, and even more so - the ideas of social justice in general.

It is impossible not to see that it was precisely during the Soviet period that both the elimination of illiteracy, the implementation of the electrification plan for the whole country, the Great Victory over fascism, and the first manned flight into space were realized. Not to mention such “trifles” as the right to work and to rest, as free education and medicine, as mass housing construction, as broad social guarantees to citizens. It was all born precisely on the night when the Great October Socialist Revolution occurred, which gave the opportunity to start building the first state in the world of workers and peasants.

There were flaws in the implementation of ideas in practice. Yes, in some years there was a shortage of consumer goods. There was an excessive bureaucracy ... Housing was underdeveloped. Cybernetics was declared pseudoscience, which, unfortunately, led to a lag. There was a lot of things. And at what time and in which country was everything absolutely perfect?

And was life in the USSR as hopeless as we are trying to impress? With all the shortage of festive delicacies and even some varieties of sausage - was there at least one settlement in the era of developed socialism where people would really go hungry? Not. The person who received even the minimum wage was guaranteed to be full, dressed, had the opportunity to pay for housing and travel, could receive medical care. Only now the grave-diggers of our great Epoch prefer to keep silent about this, who declare it all almost a complete evil - from the 1917 year to the 1991.

But then we all witnessed how quickly society degraded after the destruction of the gains of the Revolution, under the so-called “democracy”. How quickly began uncontrolled privatization, which turned into privatization. How the store shelves were filled with goods, but amid this abundance, one million per year died out. As people went to these stores, like in museums. As prices grew - and continue to grow - day by day. The consequences of "democratization" Russia can not overcome to this day. What can we say about the other Republics of the destroyed Soviet Union, where the situation is even worse?

In any case, those who do not see the great deed of the Russian people in the October Revolution, in practice, are not far from the crazy crowd with torchlight processions, shouting "Moskalyaku to the Gilyak" (together with the similar slogan "Kommunyaky to the Gilyak"). Who condemns the Soviet period, which is very important in our history, gives food to the most notorious anti-Russian forces. These anti-Russian forces see the whole “barbarism” in the whole history of our country, and in the Soviet period - the continuation of this “barbarism” (reducing this period only to the excesses of the first years, to the notorious GULAG and denying the achievements and social gains).

In Soviet times, there may have been an erroneous denial of the positive that was in previous periods. For too long, the traumas of the injustice that prevailed in pre-revolutionary times remained in the memory of the oppressed. But, if we recognize this denial as erroneous, then why do we consider the equally total denial of decades of socialism acceptable?

Burp 90-x - the constant exaggerated exaggeration of the topic of victims of political repression; calls for the destruction of the Mausoleum and monuments to V.I. Lenin and other leaders of the October Revolution; the disparate commemoration of writers loved in the West in their time, like Solzhenitsyn; films that distort the history of the Soviet period give powerful support to the Russophobic forces abroad and, in the end, harm our country during the current round of global confrontation. If we want to stand in the midst of the current world storms and continue to win victories, there is no need to give the enemy such trumps. On the contrary it would be worth reconsidering the attitude to the Great October Socialist Revolution at the state level and rehabilitate those who were so unjustly slandered in the years of "democratization." The Soviet era and its gigantic achievements could be ours weapons in the information war.

So - with the holiday! Happy November 7!
Author:
123 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 7 November 2017 06: 54 New
    28
    Once again, with the Great Jubilee, comrades!
    1. Maksus
      Maksus 7 November 2017 07: 59 New
      +7
      The author confuses green with soft. There is no anti-communism, for no one is interested in communism apart from Russia. Therefore, there is only anti-Russian hysteria and propaganda.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 7 November 2017 08: 36 New
          14
          when the Russians lost their state
          here you are mildly lying. Here, listen to the one who traded the Motherland.



          Moreover, the country handed over to abruptly Poroshenko. I just did not kiss the feet of the owners.
          1. novel66
            novel66 7 November 2017 09: 39 New
            13
            can. and kissed. hell knows what was behind closed doors!
          2. ver_
            ver_ 7 November 2017 10: 50 New
            +6
            ... with what pleasure he would put two cattle on stakes .. for edification ...
          3. 34 region
            34 region 7 November 2017 12: 22 New
            +3
            08.36. Gardamir! Good speech! This communism then sowed social discord, enmity? Communism collapsed forever? But what about each according to his needs? Bad slogan? But for some reason it is carried out in reality in the ruling elite. Even their salary. Assign what they want. And where is the economic rationale for just such salaries? Then at work they approached the management with the question of raising salaries. The management raised eyebrows and was genuinely surprised. Why did your salary suit you yesterday, but not today? Do you have a business case for salary growth? So the messengers left with nothing. Does communism have no human appearance? Well, capitalism is of course perfection itself !? So with perfection they created fascism and create radicalism. According to capitalism, is this a perfect relationship ?! Lord Bless America! Here licked so licked! Where did the KGB look when such as Gorbachev and Yeltsin moved into power? Or did Andropov intentionally promote his people? But Andropov was far from being a stupid person.
            1. verner1967
              verner1967 7 November 2017 14: 32 New
              0
              Quote: 34 region
              Where did the KGB look when such as Gorbachev and Yeltsin moved into power?

              So the KGB is an integral part of this communism, the flesh of the flesh, moreover, the extreme ...
            2. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 7 November 2017 14: 39 New
              +5
              Quote: 34 region
              Where did the KGB look when such as Gorbachev and Yeltsin moved into power?

              I looked where I needed to. That's just the committee could not do anything - for even under Nikita, in the wake of hysteria to combat the cult of personality and excesses, the committee was forbidden to work at the top of the country's leadership. The fate of the elite again began to be decided in its own narrow circle.
          4. free
            free 7 November 2017 12: 44 New
            +6
            Quote: Gardamir
            when the Russians lost their state
            here you are mildly lying. Here, listen to the one who traded the Motherland.



            Moreover, the country handed over to abruptly Poroshenko. I just did not kiss the feet of the owners.

            damned dog, Judas
          5. dSK
            dSK 7 November 2017 16: 53 New
            +4
            Before that, the EBN passed his membership card, he was the first secretary of the Sverdlovsk regional committee, then a member of the Central Committee of the CPSU.
            1. badens1111
              badens1111 8 November 2017 10: 37 New
              0
              Quote: dsk
              Before EBN passed a membership card

              What is not clear to you?
              Quote: free
              damned dog, Judas
      2. d ^ Amir
        d ^ Amir 7 November 2017 10: 07 New
        11
        Russia has not consistently succumbed to the West in the role of the Kingdom (defamation of Ivan the Terrible for its cruelty called Vasilyevich, etc. ..), the Empire (from Peter to Nicholas II), the Soviet State, the current liberal democratic republic ....
        Conclusion: their dream is to see us all in a coffin in white slippers ... i.e. make us genocide ... and what form of government in our territory is currently applied does not matter ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Elena Zakharova
        Elena Zakharova 7 November 2017 14: 23 New
        +4
        Quote: Maksus
        Therefore, there is only anti-Russian hysteria and propaganda.

        I am always tormented by the question of why it is precisely to us, in Russia, that the idea of ​​communism is imposed.
        Why should the Communists not take the simpler path, and try to build it in a small country, and present the result to us so that we all become envious and also (on our own, without coercion) would like to live the same way.
        1. verner1967
          verner1967 7 November 2017 14: 33 New
          +1
          Quote: Elena Zakharova
          Why don't the communists go the simpler way

          Because it is utopia and it is impossible
        2. 34 region
          34 region 7 November 2017 16: 03 New
          +4
          14.23. Elena! And why is capitalism spreading everywhere? Today, capitalism is everywhere. But this is not enough for capitalism. He instills radicalism. In the 45th, this attempt failed. But today it is developing successfully. And apparently a radical society is being prepared to replace capitalism.
          *** Why not the Communists take the simpler path and try to build it in a small country, and present the result to us, so that we all become envious and also (on our own, without coercion) would like to live the same way. *** Communism the oligarchy and officials have already been built. To each at will! What salary you want, you will appoint one. What income you want, you have it! The availability of everything! Guaranteed availability! So we have built communism for a narrow circle of people. Only this communism is fenced off from the rest. Entrance to the houses only by passes. Around the camera and security. Life seems to be in prison. But people are happy with their communism! And try to convince them otherwise.
          1. verner1967
            verner1967 7 November 2017 20: 06 New
            +1
            Quote: 34 region
            And apparently a radical society is being prepared to replace capitalism.

            were the Bolsheviks not radicals?
            1. 34 region
              34 region 7 November 2017 22: 14 New
              0
              20.06/XNUMX. Werner! Did the Bolsheviks burn in the ovens and cut their heads?
              1. verner1967
                verner1967 7 November 2017 23: 05 New
                +1
                Quote: 34 region
                Did the Bolsheviks burn in the ovens and cut their heads?

                maybe not, but is it better to stoke and shoot people?
                1. 34 region
                  34 region 8 November 2017 00: 15 New
                  +1
                  22.14. Werner! Who was drowned and who was shot? Is this about the entire period of the USSR or only about the Civil? So in Civilian how many free Cossacks were like Makhno. And who were they for? We rushed here and there. Others like to talk about the bloodthirstiness of the Reds. But here statistics have already been cited. And White somehow killed more Reds than White Reds. Some like to blame the Reds for oppressing those who disagree with them. But the Reds were among the Finns, the Germans, and the French. What was the fate of the Reds in the enlightened and humane West? Where are the Reds?
                  1. verner1967
                    verner1967 8 November 2017 18: 04 New
                    0
                    Quote: 34 region
                    And White somehow killed more Reds than White Reds.

                    strange, why didn’t they win?
                    Quote: 34 region
                    Who was drowned and who was shot? This is about the entire period of the USSR

                    for example, officers. Well, then they began to shoot those who were objectionable, who thought wrong, then they began to put them in prisons, and later - in psychiatric hospitals.
                    Quote: 34 region
                    So in Civilian how many free Cossacks were like Makhno. And who were they for? We rushed here and there.

                    rushed about because they believed the red in their tales went after them, but soon realized that the tale is not so sweet, and that, in your opinion, a person has no right to think with his mind, and not with slogans? So you won’t be fed up with slogans.
                    Quote: 34 region
                    What was the fate of the Reds in the enlightened and humane West? Where are the Reds?

                    so the enlightened west understood that the Reds were carrying and did not follow their slogans, they shot everyone who was the most stubborn and all the short-lived.
                    1. 34 region
                      34 region 8 November 2017 18: 53 New
                      0
                      18.04/XNUMX. Werner! Well, the Nazis killed more people. Why didn’t they win? Is it strange? Shot officers? Well, it seems like they released under an honest officer’s word. No? And then what did the officers do? The Reds shot those who thought wrong? But what did the Miller-Tchaikovsky government do? And what did Kornilov regret? We hung to go, but we had to go to hang! Some orders came from whites about humanity. For what Denikin was even called a woman. But the stars on the body were cut out, the tendons were cut off, people boiled in boiling water and froze in the cold. Did the Reds tell tales? And with whom did the Germans collaborate? Really with Lenin? *** so the enlightened west understood that the Reds were carrying and did not follow their slogans, they shot everyone who was the most stubborn and all the short-lived. *** yes And where are the regrets about the actions of the West? what *** the tale is not so sweet, but what do you think a person has no right to think with his mind, and not with slogans? *** belay
                2. badens1111
                  badens1111 8 November 2017 00: 24 New
                  +1
                  Quote: verner1967
                  maybe not, but is it better to stoke and shoot people?

                  Kolchakites did this. You disgustingly know History.
                  Conditional name of the myth:

                  Stalin in Tsaritsin drowned barges filled with arrested officers
                  Detailed description:

                  The myth is used to show the cruelty of Stalin.

                  Examples of using:

                  “he did witness Soso’s exploits in Tsaritsyn, including the drowning of barges with arrested officers”

                  Validity: http: //wiki.istmat.info/%D0%BC%D
                  0%B8%D1%84:%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B6%D0%B8_%D1%81_
                  %D1%83%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%
                  D1%8B%D0%BC%D0%B8_%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%
                  D1%8B%D0%BC%D0%B8
                  1. verner1967
                    verner1967 8 November 2017 18: 30 New
                    0
                    Quote: badens1111
                    Kolchakites did it.

                    I know Kolchak was drowned too (corpse)
                    Quote: badens1111
                    You disgustingly know History.

                    don’t make yourself a zest; clever facial expressions don't suit you laughing
            2. Elena Zakharova
              Elena Zakharova 7 November 2017 22: 54 New
              +5
              Quote: verner1967
              were the Bolsheviks not radicals?

              Any radicalism is defined very simply - the desire to be unique in a political clearing.
              Of course, the Bolsheviks in this field have no equal.
              What is funny, they still do not accept criticism and continue to bend their own.
              1. verner1967
                verner1967 7 November 2017 23: 07 New
                +1
                Quote: Elena Zakharova
                What is funny, they still do not accept criticism and continue to bend their own.

                yes, that would be funny when it wasn't so sad ...
              2. badens1111
                badens1111 8 November 2017 00: 25 New
                +2
                Quote: Elena Zakharova
                What is funny, they still do not accept criticism and continue to bend their own.

                You should be silent.
                Your Natsik already twist around the country.
                We are assured that the Bolsheviks overthrew legal power. However, the facts cast doubt on the legitimacy of the Provisional Government.

                The decision to dissolve the State Duma, setting a date for the resumption of its work in April, was made by the Council of Ministers of the Russian Empire in the late evening of February 26 (March 11), 1917. Such powers were granted to the Prime Minister, Prince Nikolai Golitsyn, by Nicholas II. Before leaving for Mogilev at the Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, the emperor left Golitsyn a form of his decree on the termination of the Duma meetings, in which it remained to set the date.

                February 27 (March 12) in the Tauride Palace, the decree was announced to the deputies. They did not begin to transfer the tsar’s will, but they immediately prudently elected the Provisional Committee of the State Duma to “establish order in the city of Petrograd and to communicate with institutions and persons”. The committee played an important role, not in “establishing order”, but in the formation of a new government.

                The collapse of tsarist power in the capital occurred with staggering speed (see the February Revolution through the eyes of eyewitnesses (https://ria.ru/zinoviev_club/20170307/1489475805
                .html
              3. 34 region
                34 region 8 November 2017 00: 37 New
                +2
                22.54. Zakharova! *** Any radicalism is defined very simply - the desire to be unique in a political clearing. *** If you use this definition, then capitalism is radical! He wants to be the only one in a political clearing. Competitors crush and ruthlessly destroyed. Therefore, capitalism in the political field has no equal other than a system based on radicalism. This radicalism has been tested in Germany, is now being tested on Islam. Although the soil for radicalism could be another religion. But surely in the depths there is a radicalization of other religions. *** What is funny, they still do not accept criticism and continue to bend their own. *** Is it about capitalism? That's how much Russia does not express deep concern, and the West stubbornly bends its line! And after all, he (the West) (capitalism) does not recognize any criticism against him!
                1. Elena Zakharova
                  Elena Zakharova 8 November 2017 08: 56 New
                  +2
                  Quote: 34 region
                  *** What is funny, they still do not accept criticism and continue to bend their own. ***

                  This is me about modern communists.
                  1. badens1111
                    badens1111 8 November 2017 10: 38 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Elena Zakharova
                    This is me about modern communists.

                    The anti-Soviet, anti-communist road is one, in essence.
                    English battleship, Wehrmacht, CIA. There are no other options.
                    As soon as someone enters this road, it soon turns out that the path has already been trodden on, before him, by the English boots of the “Russian army” of Wrangel, the shoe-worn boots of the ROA, and the NATO berets.
          2. Elena Zakharova
            Elena Zakharova 7 November 2017 22: 51 New
            +5
            Quote: 34 region
            The oligarchy and officials have already built communism. To each at will! What salary you want, you will appoint one.

            The Soviet party bosses also had communism, in fact immediately after the revolution, as soon as they all moved to the Kremlin together in order to live.
            But what do you offer?
            Is it possible that someone with a communist party ticket would determine whether I should live in a separate apartment or not?
            And suddenly, she’s worthy, because this did not end the mockery of the person where they indicate they should go there, neither the district, nor the house, nor the layout, nor even the floor could choose the person himself, everything was decided for him by uncles and aunts ... ..
            So in all matters of life.
            Do you dear like it?
            1. verner1967
              verner1967 7 November 2017 23: 08 New
              +2
              Quote: Elena Zakharova
              Do you dear like it?

              sometimes you think that they are some kind of masochists or are in their incomprehensible daydreams, or maybe the memory is short ...
            2. 34 region
              34 region 8 November 2017 00: 27 New
              0
              22.51. Zakharova! Your comment about today? Somehow everything is very similar to the present. Our oligarchs today precisely determine the standard of living of the population above which it should not rise. Today, doesn’t they indicate the area where people live? Finger of course do not show. But materially, yes. How did Medvedev say that? No need to hold on to housing, you need to go where there is work! Medvedev invited everyone to become homeless? How to understand his words? If you compare life in the USSR today? Today is more harsh and cynical. With the declaration of freedom, there really is no freedom and it is being cut. It goes to the fact that not everyone will be able to receive education and is being treated. Everything is planned and made paid! And what freedom is it if you have to pay for everything? There was more freedom in the USSR.
              1. Elena Zakharova
                Elena Zakharova 8 November 2017 08: 59 New
                +2
                Quote: 34 region
                There was more freedom in the USSR.

                Oh well, they bent like that.
                And Medvedev, by the way, is right. You need to work where there is work.
                And I completely agree with him.

                And you probably offer to artificially create work as it was about the owls. authorities, like that everyone would be busy, and it doesn’t matter what the trash actually released?
                1. 34 region
                  34 region 8 November 2017 14: 21 New
                  +1
                  08.59.Zakharova! Weird! Why artificially create work in Moscow, and not in the regions? Why do trains and columns of shift workers regularly go to Moscow? What is the point in creating a metropolis?
              2. verner1967
                verner1967 8 November 2017 18: 08 New
                0
                Quote: 34 region
                Everything is planned and made paid!

                are there any examples of closing budget courses? By the way, under the USSR, if the exam failed, then what? That's right, sit without education, and now at least you can learn how to pay, so now there are more opportunities.
                Quote: 34 region
                Today, doesn’t they indicate the area where people live?

                No, I chose an apartment that I liked in the house that I liked.
            3. badens1111
              badens1111 8 November 2017 00: 27 New
              +1
              Quote: Elena Zakharova
              Is it possible that someone with a communist party ticket would determine whether I should live in a separate apartment or not?

              Your dad, didn’t you have a separate apartment, being a party functionary, why didn’t you abandon it?
              Quote: Elena Zakharova
              And suddenly, she’s worthy, because this did not end the mockery of the person where they indicate they should go there, neither the district, nor the house, nor the layout, nor even the floor could choose the person himself, everything was decided for him by uncles and aunts ... ..

              Another lie.
              1. Elena Zakharova
                Elena Zakharova 8 November 2017 09: 02 New
                +3
                Quote: badens1111
                Your dad

                My dad is an engineer, and he was driven around the country all his life, now there is a jamb, then there is a mistake from the next communist leader, and he had to correct it.

                Quote: badens1111
                Another lie

                This is not a lie, but a cruel truth from which you would be glad to disown, but it will not work.
                1. badens1111
                  badens1111 8 November 2017 10: 40 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Elena Zakharova
                  My dad is an engineer, and he was driven around the country all his life, now there is a jamb, then there is a mistake from the next communist leader, and he had to correct it.

                  Completely lie to madam, your dad is a party nomenclature, who in 1991 quickly changed his beliefs.
                  Quote: Elena Zakharova
                  This is not a lie, but a cruel truth from which you would be glad to disown, but it will not work.

                  Your tough lie is the direct path of Vlasovism.
                  I have to repeat it.
                  The anti-Soviet have one road, in essence. English battleship, Wehrmacht, CIA. There are no other options. As soon as someone enters this road, it soon turns out that the path has already been trodden on, before him, by the English boots of the “Russian army” of Wrangel, the shoe-worn boots of the ROA, and the NATO berets.
                  1. Elena Zakharova
                    Elena Zakharova 8 November 2017 13: 15 New
                    +3
                    Pierce stupid things.
                    1. badens1111
                      badens1111 8 November 2017 16: 04 New
                      0
                      In replicating stupidities, as well as in setting up scandals, promoting Nazism in the form of a liberal trend of national democrats, you have no equal.
                      Maltsev will soon be dragged to the country for trial, accomplices are already knitting, so you go on, go on deeply anti-state rhetoric on the sites where you are.
                      1. Elena Zakharova
                        Elena Zakharova 8 November 2017 16: 56 New
                        +3
                        Quote: badens1111
                        continue deep anti-state rhetoric

                        And what, the Communists are already in power and Zyuganov is the president of Russia?
                        They made fun again)))
              2. verner1967
                verner1967 8 November 2017 17: 57 New
                +1
                Quote: badens1111
                Your dad, as a party functionary, didn’t have a separate apartment

                that is, you acknowledge that the communist leaders built communism for themselves, and they drove the rest of the people like a donkey for a carrot, promising a bright future from day to day lol
            4. tezey
              tezey 10 November 2017 15: 58 New
              0
              Dear Elena, the communism of the Soviet party bosses who moved together in an endeavor to live in the Kremlin and did not stand next to, say, the standard of living of the Moscow professors. And the Communist’s party ticket didn’t at all determine in Soviet times whether you were worthy to live in a separate apartment, or not worthy. Who told you this stupidity. Yes, there were priorities in the distribution of housing. This is the number of family members, this is a highly qualified specialist when moving to another city, this is the limiters in Moscow. Yes, that's the way the limiters are. You say, what about the nomenclature. And here it is. Of course, members of the Central Committee had no problems with housing, as did members of the government-ministers and deputies. For the rest, it was their turn. It is clear that this line cannot be compared with the line for workers of the Compressor plant, but the housing for a member of the collegium of the All-Union Ministry did not differ from the housing of the worker from the Compressor plant. Compare the current state of affairs. That and that.
      5. badens1111
        badens1111 8 November 2017 00: 30 New
        +1
        Quote: Maksus
        Therefore, there is only anti-Russian hysteria and propaganda.

        As one of our colleagues on the site wrote, “The anti-advisers have one road, in essence. The English battleship, the Wehrmacht, the CIA. There are no other options. As soon as someone enters this road, it soon becomes clear that the path is already trodden down to him, the English boots of the "Russian army" Wrangel, the shoe-worn boots of the ROA, the NATO berets. "
        And this is so.
        And he added, everyone who is trying in vain to lie to the great past. In the end, he turns out to be either a Solzhenitsyn or a Suvorov. He’s also some kind of miscreant, obviously or not, who are fed by the West.
        1. Elena Zakharova
          Elena Zakharova 8 November 2017 09: 06 New
          +3
          Quote: badens1111
          being fed by the West.

          It’s a strange thing, that all the Communists constantly write frank nonsense, like if the anti-Soviet means Russophobe ... but there is a simple and indisputable fact, the same West claps its hands from happiness that we still have communists in Russia. Supports them in every possible way, not only financially but also morally, but you have almost been dispersed all over the world.
          Why?
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 8 November 2017 10: 42 New
            +1
            Quote: Elena Zakharova
            Why?

            Yes, because you are from 90, or rather you like them completely isolate completely.
            Quote: Elena Zakharova
            the same west claps its hands with happiness that we still have communists in Russia. Supports them in every possible way, not only financially but also morally, but you have almost been dispersed all over the world.

            Here is an example of another lie.
            China, dispersed from 1,5 billion? A dream of the Americans?
            1. Elena Zakharova
              Elena Zakharova 8 November 2017 13: 16 New
              +3
              Zyuganov runs to the American Embassy?
              What is he doing there?
              Eating cookies or stomping angrily legs?
              1. badens1111
                badens1111 8 November 2017 16: 08 New
                0
                Quote: Elena Zakharova
                Eating cookies or stomping angrily legs?

                Yours? In Miami and London? How would they not take away what they put up?
                You have cookies, all in the same office are baked, you just manage to mimic here and there, allegedly as a patriot, in fact, there is much more harm from you than from the most notorious Western liars.
                With regards to Zyuganov, is it forbidden for the head of the second-largest party in the country to meet with ambassadors? Is it forbidden for him to say that you poke your nose at Russia, is the United States ordered? Have you been banned, do you work for the State Department?
                But aren't all yours, lobbied with partners, as they are called, don’t have apartments in the USA, stash for rainy days in the same place, kids at school?
                1. Elena Zakharova
                  Elena Zakharova 8 November 2017 21: 43 New
                  +2
                  Quote: badens1111
                  You have cookies

                  Nect no!
                  Zyuganov and Kalashnikov have cookies! Faces by the way, what are they pleased that Teft passed the liver from hand to hand))
                  1. badens1111
                    badens1111 8 November 2017 21: 53 New
                    0
                    Lord .. stupid how ..
                    1. Elena Zakharova
                      Elena Zakharova 9 November 2017 11: 24 New
                      +2
                      Really don't like it?
    2. dSK
      dSK 7 November 2017 08: 18 New
      +4
      In the morning there are three publications about the revolution, but where about the mausoleum?
      1. Mestny
        Mestny 7 November 2017 10: 28 New
        0
        What's wrong with him?
        1. bandabas
          bandabas 7 November 2017 11: 26 New
          +2
          Maybe dsk- Poklonskaya?
    3. ID90
      ID90 7 November 2017 10: 15 New
      +3
      Quote: 210ox
      Once again, with the Great Jubilee, comrades!

      1. Radikal
        Radikal 7 November 2017 13: 19 New
        +2
        Quote: kvs207
        So - with the holiday! Happy November 7!

        And what is so modest? On the 100th anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution, comrades!
        Wangyu - now lovers of the crunch of French rolls will fly in and will prove that socialism is bad.

        yes good drinks
    4. igorj 51
      igorj 51 7 November 2017 14: 58 New
      +1
      Once again, with the Great Jubilee, comrades!

      Thank you very much, and you as well Dear comrade ..!
  2. Grandfather
    Grandfather 7 November 2017 06: 55 New
    12
    “one cannot be reconciled until the victorious end,” each commander puts himself.
    1. weksha50
      weksha50 7 November 2017 14: 33 New
      +3
      Quote: Dead Day
      everyone puts a comma.


      There, a Budyonnovsky holds his hand better than Uncle Sam ...
      You can strangle or break your neck faster ...
      Without any commas ... Immediately put an end to ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Moore
    Moore 7 November 2017 07: 09 New
    20
    Today at 11-00 Moscow time on the Petrogradskaya embankment at the cruiser "Aurora" laying flowers. People raised money and bought 7150 carnations. Correctly. Good.
    https://quarterbackrene.livejournal.com/231041.ht
    ml
    According to the article. Whatever they say about the charm of pre-revolutionary life, it was the Revolution that gave the most powerful kick to the development of not only Russia - the whole world, it changed in fact.
    And reconciliation (as well as the end of the fight against the "cult of personality"), which is now being ranted from high tribunes, will only be possible if those in power today can provide the people with some results of their work in the social, cultural and economic spheres, comparable with socialist.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. My address
    My address 7 November 2017 07: 19 New
    22
    Looking at the untold riches of oligarchs and elites, you understand how rich the Soviet Union was.
  7. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 7 November 2017 07: 20 New
    22
    anti-communism and Russophobia too often go in the same harness.
    For me, anti-advisers are akin to traitors!
  8. kvs207
    kvs207 7 November 2017 07: 21 New
    17
    So - with the holiday! Happy November 7!

    And what is so modest? On the 100th anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution, comrades!
    Wangyu - now lovers of the crunch of French rolls will fly in and will prove that socialism is bad.
    1. ver_
      ver_ 7 November 2017 10: 53 New
      +1
      ..in the coffin would see her in white slippers ...
      1. bandabas
        bandabas 7 November 2017 11: 28 New
        +5
        Horror revised dear?
        1. dSK
          dSK 7 November 2017 16: 59 New
          +3
          Metropolitan Gorlovsky and Slavic Mitrofan | November 6, 2017
          “From a legal point of view, Prince Dimitry Pozharsky rebelled against the lawful rulers, against the legitimate sovereign who was in Moscow and seemed to have all the rights to rule the people. The prince gathered around himself a militia and went to free the city from his“ rule. ”Pozharsky was called a traitor and a traitor at that time, but today he’s a national hero and monuments are erected to him. This example shows very clearly that the Motherland is not the president and not the government, not the majority in the Verkhovna Rada or any other parliament. The motherland is the land on which we live according to which we walk, which we love, from which we can never refuse, how impossible it is to abandon parents.
          To love the Motherland does not mean to love some party, left or right, any politician or ruler. To love the Motherland is to love the land on which you live, and to do everything so that this land does not go bankrupt, but flourishes, so that life on it becomes better. It’s not the one who waves the flag or shouts patriotic slogans who loves his homeland, but the one who does not steal, does not rob, does not deceive, who has compassion, helps those who are next to him, build and build this land, and not destroy, do not make it lifeless desert. "
          Two hands for! hi
        2. ver_
          ver_ 10 November 2017 18: 08 New
          0
          ... I have nothing against the revolution in technology, science, but not in a violent breakdown of being, violence and rivers of human blood ..
  9. mavrus
    mavrus 7 November 2017 07: 25 New
    +8
    All with the anniversary of the Great October Revolution.
    1. ID90
      ID90 7 November 2017 10: 18 New
      +5
      Quote: mavrus
      All with the anniversary of the Great October Revolution.

  10. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 7 November 2017 07: 32 New
    +5
    In any case, those who do not see in the October Revolution the great deed of the Russian people
    Is the Russian people? Reading the names of most of the first persons of the "Russian Revolution", there are VERY big doubts about its Russianness.
    1. dSK
      dSK 7 November 2017 16: 47 New
      +4
      The Zionist composition of the 1917 coup:
      Central Committee of the Right Wing of the ESER Party:
      Kerensky, Aronovich, Gissler, Lvovich-Davidovich, Gurevich, Gotz, Goldstein, Lihach, Kintshuk, Verlinrut, Distler, Chernyavsky, Rosenberg, Tchaikovsky, Ratner.
      The Central Committee of the Social Democratic Party MENSHEVIKOV:
      Dimand, N. Himmer, Strauss, Ratner, Lieber, Zonn, Dan, Abramovich, Rappoport, Cederbaum (Martov), ​​Tsederbaum (Levitsky).
      Central Committee of the Left Wing of the ESER Party:
      Sternberg, Levin, Fishman, Lenberg, Stytsa, Lander. Kagan (Gresser-Kamkov), Katz (Bernstein), Feiga Ostrovskaya, Nachman, Karelin, Maria Spiridonova.
      Central Committee of the Social Democratic Labor Party - Bolsheviks:
      Bronstein (Trotsky), Ulyanov-Blank (Lenin), Apfelbaum-Radomyslsky (Zinoviev), Lurie (Larin), Krylenko, Mandelstam (Lunacharsky), Uritsky, Goldshtein (Volodarsky), Rosenfeld (Kamenev), Smidovich (Yoshua-Yoshua) Sverdlov), Nakhamkes (Steklov) ... After the October change:
      in the Council of People's Commissars of 22 members - 19 were Jews;
      in the military commissariat led by Trotsky - only 1 Latvian, and the rest are all Jews;
      in the People’s Commissariat of Internal Affairs - the future of the Cheka, the NKVD - all Jews;
      in the People’s Commissariat of Finance - out of 30 people - 26 Jews;
      in the People’s Commissariat of Justice - all Jews ... etc.
      Jews seized power in Russia. Facts are a stubborn thing.
      1. bnm.99
        bnm.99 7 November 2017 19: 53 New
        +1
        ... And in Saratov women were socialized, bastards. Lenin is actually the grandson of the Chuvash peasants of the Sergach Uyezd. To trust Belyachkov’s agitation in the 1917st century, in my opinion, is bad manners. Lenin and the Bolsheviks can be treated differently, but judging objectively, in XNUMX they did the right thing. They began to decompose under Khrushchev. And yes - “they aimed at communism (or something else), but fell into Russia” - it’s relevant at least since the time of Ivan the Terrible.
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 8 November 2017 21: 07 New
          +1
          Quote: bnm.99
          but judging objectively, in 1917 they did the right thing

          Rebel in a warring country - right? Shoot bundles of "your graces" indiscriminately - right? Question test - do you want the same now? Just do not need to get out, like the wrong time - time is always wrong. Stalin did the right thing by destroying the Leninist guard (most of the representatives of the left-wing denomination). hi
  11. Alex66
    Alex66 7 November 2017 07: 42 New
    12
    Refusing to conquer the October Revolution, our government repeats the old situation, only now they will fly in more than a hundred years ago, for not learned a lesson, history punishes more severely and the degradation of education, medicine, pensions will result in the collapse of industry, a loss of competitiveness. The greed of the elite who wants to get rich now at the expense of the people will lead to disaster and the repetition of the lesson learned lesson of October.
  12. parusnik
    parusnik 7 November 2017 08: 01 New
    10
    Most clearly you can see the link between anti-communism and Russophobia in Ukraine
    ... Our bow happened a long time ago ... still in the 90s ...
  13. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 7 November 2017 08: 22 New
    +8
    A much more balanced article than other authors recently. I absolutely agree with her theses
  14. FID
    FID 7 November 2017 08: 41 New
    +4
    These forces do not want to see Russia strong, so the Soviet Union was hostile to them,

    I apologize when the USSR was, and here is a strong Russia? You do not confuse the concept?
    1. badens1111
      badens1111 8 November 2017 10: 48 New
      0
      Quote: SSI
      I apologize when the USSR was, and here is a strong Russia? You do not confuse the concept?

      And because the USSR was, historically, geopolitically, precisely RUSSIA. Do you not realize this?
      And by betraying the elite, the fruits of labor and the rivers of blood of the ancestors who left such a country to their descendants were immediately nullified.
      The 17th century is practically on the territory ... we thank for this the all-liberal army and their accomplices from among all kinds of shifters, nationalists of the national Democrats, one of them is E. Zakharova, other capitulators and compromisers of the late 20th century, surnames are known, Yeltsins, Gorbachevs , yaeovlev, sobchaki.chubai
      sons, Svanidza, Sytins, Drandins, Yavlinsky. and others ..
      1. A.V.S.
        A.V.S. 8 November 2017 11: 09 New
        +2
        Quote: badens1111
        The USSR was, historically, geopolitically, RUSSIA

        The USSR was an enemy of Russia, a mortal enemy. The Soviet fought against the Russian army Russian government. USSR and Russia are the antipodes, the exact opposite.
        Soviet statehood was fundamentally and emphasized anti-Russian in nature, so considering it a period of Russian history is legal nonsense. There was no legal continuity between the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, the fight against Russia was considered a feat in the USSR, and the service of the Russian Empire was actually considered a crime ...
        1. badens1111
          badens1111 8 November 2017 11: 12 New
          0
          Quote: A.W.S.
          The USSR was an enemy of Russia, a mortal enemy. The Soviet fought against the Russian army of the Russian government.

          There are no words from sheer nonsense and bullshit you gave out. request
          What school did you study in, what do you give out? English, American? Bolonkin system?
          1. A.V.S.
            A.V.S. 8 November 2017 11: 18 New
            +2
            Quote: badens1111
            What school did you attend

            In a Soviet school, where they talked about the Soviet heroes of the Red Army who fought against the Russian Army, and the valor of Chekists who killed officials of the Russian government. Even the culture was divided into the "Russian" culture of Russia and the "Soviet" culture of the USSR. Why do you attach your Soviet Union to a completely different country ?!
  15. Nonna
    Nonna 7 November 2017 08: 59 New
    11
    The Kremlin refused to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the 1917 revolution. It would be strange if the "new nobles" decided to celebrate the event when the same was paid for what they deserved. And the fact that thanks to this the country literally jumped into the future at the age of ten, fundamental and applied science blossomed in a riotous color, received an 8-hour working day, social. guarantees, etc., universal accessible education (the best in the world), thanks to which they flew first into space, and nuclear and not only energy developed, thanks to which the people won - this, of course, is no reason to celebrate. There is no more eloquent example for understanding the current attitude towards ordinary people ... "
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 7 November 2017 11: 01 New
      +6
      Quote: Nonna
      The Kremlin refused to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the 1917 revolution. It would be strange if the "new nobles" decided to celebrate the event when the same was paid for what they deserved.

      and these people, on the 4th of this month, called for "unity." Interestingly, their children abroad, also celebrated the "new holiday"?
  16. Cat Marquis
    Cat Marquis 7 November 2017 09: 05 New
    +5
    Another thing is curious: in the understanding of the Bolsheviks, the communist state should have been something like: everyone works in one common fund and then the elected party members divide everything into everyone ... at first, they wanted to "divide" "equally", then they understood that it wouldn’t work out and They planned to "divide" according to the "labor contribution", but then .... Stalin shot them and so as not to steal, introduced a slave system for part of the "unnecessary" population ("enemies of the people"). However, he didn’t invent anything himself. At the same time, the United States did the same thing to “recycle” the “unnecessary” population during the Great Depression. Hitler acted somewhat more “fairer” with his people — he did not “utilize” the people of his country, but the peoples of other countries — for which he needed to seize other countries. By the way, it’s exactly along the path of the Bolsheviks that the modern ISIS also planned to work there all in one “common fund”, followed by separation “by contribution”, and it was also planned to introduce slavery for the Gentiles (“enemies of the people”). what
    1. rkkasa xnumx
      rkkasa xnumx 7 November 2017 10: 25 New
      +6
      Quote: Marquis Cat
      everyone works in one common fund and then the elected party members divide everything into everyone

      This principle also roughly works in any state, always the smaller part administers the common fund, which is created by the bulk of the citizens. The difference is only in the degree of contribution to the common fund. In cap countries, this contribution is less, in socialist countries more, and the experience of the USSR and China showed a very good result.
      Quote: Marquis Cat
      they were shot by Stalin and introduced slave system

      What is this nonsense?
      1. verner1967
        verner1967 7 November 2017 14: 40 New
        +1
        Quote: rkkasa 81
        the experience of the USSR and China showed a very good result.

        Yeah, the USSR collapsed, and China rose out of poverty after it freed the economy from communist dogma, relying on the free economic zones that colonial capitalism gave them. These are the results!
        1. rkkasa xnumx
          rkkasa xnumx 7 November 2017 14: 56 New
          +2
          Quote: verner1967
          USSR collapsed

          Collapsed due to the betrayal of the elite. And before that, from a backward agrarian country, he became one of the world leaders in many areas. Russia still maintains independence thanks to the Soviet legacy.
          Quote: verner1967
          China rose from poverty after freeing the economy from communist dogma

          China first gained independence and built a fairly powerful industry (thanks to socialism), and only then carried out economic reforms aimed at increasing the welfare of the population. The foundation of China’s current economic power is socialist.
          1. verner1967
            verner1967 7 November 2017 20: 04 New
            +2
            Quote: rkkasa 81
            China first gained independence and built a fairly powerful industry

            enough for what? Pomnitso, there was still a film in the USSR, which brutally ridiculed the theory of the "Great Leap Forward", Vysotsky sang songs about hunveibins, in the mid-80s hard workers still got cabbage and rice. And then, since the “Chinese miracle”. That’s what scares us, they say that under the tsar the whole industry was with foreigners, but the Bolsheviks .... As a result, China along with foreigners has its own developed industry and in just 15-20 years China has been a leader, and the USSR was not enough for 50 years to of this.
            Quote: rkkasa 81
            Russia still maintains independence thanks to the Soviet legacy.

            subsoil? laughing Well, the Soviet legacy was stolen in the 90s)))) or not? lol
          2. verner1967
            verner1967 8 November 2017 18: 32 New
            0
            Quote: rkkasa 81
            Collapsed due to the betrayal of the elite.

            yes yes yes .... it was lol
    2. Stas157
      Stas157 7 November 2017 10: 26 New
      +9
      Quote: Marquis Cat
      the communist state in the understanding of the Bolsheviks was supposed to be something in the form: everyone works in one common fund and then the elected party members divide everything into everyone ...

      You are perverting the basic principle of socialism: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his work”, which was enshrined in the 1936 Constitution of the USSR (Article 12). This is the economic principle of redistributing the final product of labor, and not a gangster common fund. At what it was just an intermediate link, further it would be - "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
      Further more! in your generalizations you equate bandits with communists:
      Quote: Marquis Cat
      it is along the path of the Bolsheviks that the modern ISIS also goes there, it was planned to work for all in one “common fund”, followed by separation “according to contribution”, and the introduction of slavery for non-believers (“enemies of the people”) was also planned.

      Happy holiday to all, comrades! Happy Victory Day of the Great October Socialist Revolution!
      1. Cat Marquis
        Cat Marquis 7 November 2017 10: 36 New
        +5
        It was the Bolsheviks who already in "our time" decided to divide "officially" the people of their country into "classes" - "useful" proletariat, "labor", intelligentsia, "fellow travelers" - "peasantry", other intelligentsia, and "hostile" "exploitation - parasitic ": -
        owners, capitalists, merchants, the military (not affiliated with the Reds), prosperous intelligentsia, clergy, nobility, etc. Moreover, the "hostile" classes are officially doomed to annihilation, and the survivors - to "suppression of rights." What is this if not genocide of a part of the country's population?
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 7 November 2017 10: 48 New
          +8
          Quote: Marquis Cat
          Moreover, the "hostile" classes are officially condemned to destruction, and the survivors - to "suppression of rights." What is this if not genocide of a part of the country's population?

          I would also be happy to doom some classes of corrupt officials and snickering oligarchs to destruction. But, unfortunately, the picture is such that they flourish here! What was not with the Communists, thanks to their effective work.
          1. Cat Marquis
            Cat Marquis 7 November 2017 11: 00 New
            +2
            Well, yes, how can I remember: “there is no person, no problem” ...
            Well, this is funny:
            What was not with the communists
            wink
            1. Stas157
              Stas157 7 November 2017 11: 39 New
              12
              Quote: Marquis Cat
              Well, this is funny:
              What was not with the communists

              But were there? Were there colonels who had 9 billion in apartments? Or are ministers taking millions of dollars in bribes? And from the Ministry of Defense did the Babskiy brothel be organized and sold MO property to their own pocket? Did government officials in various state-owned companies receive salaries with bonuses of tens of millions of dollars, and they lived like oligarchs?
              Those petty crimes that were then, can not be compared with the revelry that is now.
              1. Rey_ka
                Rey_ka 7 November 2017 14: 31 New
                +4
                There was always double control at that time. If there was no government in the executive branch, it was always possible to achieve the truth in the party bodies and completely to the extreme in public through the council of trade unions.
          2. ver_
            ver_ 7 November 2017 16: 58 New
            +1
            ... chi sho, do you want the success of God's chosen ones? ....
        2. 34 region
          34 region 7 November 2017 12: 33 New
          +4
          10.36. Cat! Yeah! Is this the Bolsheviks divided into classes ?! And the wealthy classes did not doom the people to extinction? What about class features? No man, no problem! Stalin did not say this phrase. There is no need here to put literary opuses into the mouth of Stalin.
        3. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 7 November 2017 14: 44 New
          +5
          Quote: Marquis Cat
          Moreover, the "hostile" classes are officially condemned to destruction, and the survivors - to "suppression of rights." What is this if not genocide of a part of the country's population?

          There is one small detail that everyone usually forgets: the destruction of a class does not mean the physical destruction of all who enter it.
          This, incidentally, is the fundamental difference between German National Socialism and Soviet socialism: a nation cannot be changed, but a class can. Therefore, the liquidation of a nation means the physical destruction of all its members, and the liquidation of a class means the transfer of its members to other classes (with inevitable reorganization - you won’t erase a word from a song, yes ...).
          1. verner1967
            verner1967 8 November 2017 18: 35 New
            0
            Quote: Alexey RA
            the fundamental difference between German National Socialism and Soviet Socialism: a nation cannot be changed, but a class can.

            they didn’t change the class or nation, they removed individuals on a national or class basis, or, to put it differently,
      2. verner1967
        verner1967 7 November 2017 14: 48 New
        +2
        Quote: Stas157
        “From each according to his ability, to each according to his work”,

        Yes, but you forgot to add, according to the norms defined by the state. And I could not earn many times more if I overfulfilled the plan, they would immediately correct it, and everything that the state would take over its established earnings. Well, what is not a thieves common fund?
      3. verner1967
        verner1967 8 November 2017 18: 33 New
        0
        Quote: Stas157
        "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

        as one fighter from the Pavlov’s house said, “So if I accept in the morning according to need, what kind of abilities will I have?”
  17. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 7 November 2017 09: 58 New
    +8
    Quote: A.W.S.
    The day when millions of people were doomed to death, and tens of millions to slavery.

    This is just how the slave scribbles anti-Russian comments without any fear of being doomed to death. You at least occasionally read the story, not the libel of the “liberals" and you have come from this science. Many lack today a simple Soviet school, which gave a really strong secondary education.
    1. verner1967
      verner1967 7 November 2017 14: 55 New
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      which gave a really strong secondary education.

      Yes, as you are right, really mean, otherwise they talk about the best here
  18. Servla
    Servla 7 November 2017 10: 02 New
    +5
    Thank you Elena! Despite everything - WE WILL REMEMBER!
  19. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 7 November 2017 10: 12 New
    +6
    I remember the television and movies of the Soviet period with pleasure! When there was censorship and the entrance of any trash and salon divas was impossible! When the authors had to be so sophisticated that very subtle humor, satire, allegoricalness appeared. When these quotes went out to the people. When the programs were really for the viewer and tried to raise his literacy and not stoop to his stupidity! When professionals who love their work, art in themselves and not themselves in art, worked!
    1. badens1111
      badens1111 8 November 2017 10: 51 New
      0
      Quote: andrej-shironov
      When professionals who love their work, art in themselves and not themselves in art, worked!

      Precisely you noticed, V. Mienshov perfectly spoke about it.
      “Freedom is a limitation. Your freedom ends where the freedom of another person begins. You must not insult and hurt another person.

      Now there is no freedom, now there is an institute of producers that behaves more unceremoniously than the CPSU Central Committee department for culture. Producers fit into all plans. I work a lot as an actor and I see how directors are unceremoniously pushed away from work ... Strictly speaking, censorship has returned, only now it has an uncontaminated character. If earlier we were pressured - I went to complain to the director of Mosfilm in Goskino and reached the Central Committee of the CPSU. And sometimes a signal came from there: what are youhave amazed the artist, give him the opportunity to speak ... Now there is no such possibility. No one to complain! The producer said - and you must either perform or leave work. In general, today it’s not state censorship at all, but the censorship of the ruble ... "
      http://www.velykoross.ru/actual/all/article_3823/
  20. SMP
    SMP 7 November 2017 10: 21 New
    +6
    On the 100th anniversary of the Revolution, with a holiday.
  21. Ural resident
    Ural resident 7 November 2017 10: 41 New
    +7
    This event really became a landmark in the development of the whole world. What can I say.
    History does not know the subjunctive mood - and analyzing all the events of the last 200 years, you understand that it could not be otherwise. Of course, 2 world wars, civil wars greatly crippled our gene pool, but despite all the troubles, the Russian people were able to build an even greater Soviet Union. They managed to realize the extraordinary idea in the state form - and once again became the defender of injustice for the whole world. Eh, if our party leaders thought in time and began to gently reform first of all economic bases - now the USSR would have stood as a single monolith.
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 7 November 2017 17: 52 New
      +3
      Quote: A resident of the Urals
      Eh, if our party leaders thought in time and began to gently reform first of all economic bases - now the USSR would have stood as a single monolith.

      And it would be, absolutely true. One of the main reasons for the death of the USSR was that in the 60s they could not rebuild the economic system from extensive to intensive development. And there were such opportunities ...
      1. CT-55_11-9009
        CT-55_11-9009 9 November 2017 11: 04 New
        0
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        One of the main reasons for the death of the USSR was that in the 60s they could not rebuild the economic system from extensive to intensive development. And there were such opportunities ...

        And then the question arises: could not or did not want to? After all, the possibilities really remained ...
  22. turbris
    turbris 7 November 2017 10: 48 New
    +6
    100 years of the Great October Socialist Revolution. An event that changed world history. You can treat it differently, you can fix a lot of pros and cons. Many brilliant achievements, many failures and crimes. Everyone is free to make choices on their own, how to evaluate the events that occurred in our country from 1917 to 1991. Not everything was bad. Not everything was good. That’s why a person was given a head to evaluate everything and draw the right conclusions. I can say for sure - without building socialism in our country, people like me would have successfully labored at the landlords or worked as small handicraftsmen (judging by the origin of my family). And what academies and higher education are there ?! I believe that not all the potential of the socialist system has been exhausted. We still use many of the socialist gains.
    Happy Holidays!
  23. Antares
    Antares 7 November 2017 11: 53 New
    +1
    Of course, before there were acts of vandalism on the part of Ukrainian nationalists regarding monuments like Pushkin

    probably we are talking about the paint and theft of a bronze cane in Odessa (or a trident in Kharkov) ... but in Odessa what you want to be stolen, not only a bronze cane.
    Although initially the Internet gives out
    a case in Orekhovo-Zuyevo, in Ussuriysk, in Bataysk, in Dimitrovgrad, and then this cruel case in Mariupol in 2012 (they still beat Michurin)
    However, "Ukrainian colleagues desecrating the monuments" are no better. Monuments to Pushkin in Kiev and Kharkov have been desecrated, while Odessa has no way with the nationalists either.
    The picture is similar, but Gromova always only sees Ukraine. Lenin is also being demolished in the Russian Federation, not so massively, but surely. Ukraine, as a more southern country, impulsively and loudly does everything. The Russian Federation, as more northern, is silent. Both are doing one thing.
  24. Olgovich
    Olgovich 7 November 2017 12: 11 New
    +6
    To my esteemed author Elena Gromova, I note that our country is THOUSAND years old and has always been loved by many and many attacked when there were no communists at all.
    And today, there is no communism, but Russophobia is full of bright light.
    1. sds87
      sds87 7 November 2017 12: 26 New
      +4
      Quote: Olgovich
      To my esteemed author Elena Gromova, I note that our country is THOUSAND years old and has always been loved by many and many attacked when there were no communists at all.
      And today, there is no communism, but Russophobia is full of bright light.

      Your truth. No matter what political system in Russia. We hate the West - Russians and other peoples living in Russia. The West has always needed us either dead or slaves.
    2. badens1111
      badens1111 8 November 2017 10: 52 New
      +1
      Quote: Olgovich
      And today, there is no communism, but Russophobia is full of bright light.

      One of its manifestations is you. Do you constantly pour dirt on the history of your own country?
  25. free
    free 7 November 2017 12: 48 New
    +5
    Burn in hell who sold the USSR, burn in hell there is no forgiveness to you.
  26. siberalt
    siberalt 7 November 2017 13: 04 New
    +4
    Quote: Maksus
    The author confuses green with soft. There is no anti-communism, for no one is interested in communism apart from Russia. Therefore, there is only anti-Russian hysteria and propaganda.

    The author does not confuse anything. There was the Great October Socialist Revolution, and there was the Gorbachev-Yeltsin counter-revolution, which was saddled by the current government. Why is it difficult to understand? And this is a step back according to the law of the evolution of society. hi
  27. Dedrusav
    Dedrusav 9 November 2017 07: 48 New
    +1
    Quote: verner1967
    Quote: Elena Zakharova
    Why don't the communists go the simpler way

    Because it is utopia and it is impossible

    PDA weeps ...)))
  28. Dedrusav
    Dedrusav 9 November 2017 07: 51 New
    +1
    Quote: ver_
    ..in the coffin would see her in white slippers ...

    Bulk-crunches are only capable of yapping. In life - with Manilov’s dreams.
  29. Selevc
    Selevc 9 November 2017 18: 25 New
    +1
    Regarding the revolution of 1917, the most interesting thing is that for some reason the whole revolution is called Russian - although it was ruled by very interesting types - half of these same leaders were one of a known nationality - NOT RUSSIAN, and the other half - people of the same nationality but with Russian pseudonyms - that is, also NOT RUSSIAN !!!
    Such a "historical pun" can only be in Russia - people of non-indigenous nationality overthrow the power of indigenous people !!!
    And the tsar was generally abruptly thrown as the last FOOL - he abdicated in favor of his brother and he decided to postpone the accession to the throne - it feels like we still live in this inter-time !!!
    1. Go tearing down the bowlers.
      Go tearing down the bowlers. 11 November 2017 21: 43 New
      0
      from oak completely collapsed? Ulyanov was at the base, he then arranged the maidan of the bastard in 1917. Fools in Ukraine do not learn from mistakes and decided to repeat the maydown.
  30. Selevc
    Selevc 10 November 2017 10: 50 New
    +1
    The revolution of 1917 can be called Russian in only one sense - the pawns in this big game were Russian and the biomass for the bloody mill of the revolution was also Russian !!! But the rest - the leaders of the revolution are NOT RUSSIAN and the money for which it was also made NOT RUSSIAN !!! And even Tsar Nikolai-durakk is also RUSSIAN EXTREME CONDITION !!!
    And I also want to note that the revolution of 1917 must always be considered in the context of the 1st World War - other assessments are biased, just like the revolution of 1991 must be considered exclusively in the context of the Cold War !!!
  31. ver_
    ver_ 10 November 2017 17: 39 New
    0
    Quote: bnm.99
    ... And in Saratov women were socialized, bastards. Lenin is actually the grandson of the Chuvash peasants of the Sergach Uyezd. To trust Belyachkov’s agitation in the 1917st century, in my opinion, is bad manners. Lenin and the Bolsheviks can be treated differently, but judging objectively, in XNUMX they did the right thing. They began to decompose under Khrushchev. And yes - “they aimed at communism (or something else), but fell into Russia” - it’s relevant at least since the time of Ivan the Terrible.

    ... Vladimir Ulyanov’s mother = Lenin - The form was a maid of honor at the court of the Emperor, where she conceived .. She was married to Ulyanov, away from sin and excommunicated ..
  32. Go tearing down the bowlers.
    Go tearing down the bowlers. 11 November 2017 21: 36 New
    0
    Actually, we live in Russia, and not in the USSR! From Peter the Great, another name went officially Russia. So most likely the author is still the Russophobe obtained in practice. The USSR has rotted in less than one century, and Russia-Russia has long been and will exist. The author is from the evil one and prevents the anti-communists and Russophobes in a heap, not from a special mind.
  33. ver_
    ver_ 16 November 2017 15: 38 New
    0
    Quote: dsk


    ... But the RD-180 rocket engine, the best in the world, was explained to you in a popular way .., well, they don’t really agree with .. the shanyushkov will not have this phenomenon, but quite the contrary ..